Why is Licensing Board Threatening Jordan Peterson's License? | Dangers of Emotional Board Members 

I suspect they will drop it for now. What a precedent to set for the rest of the world! "If we don't like your tweets, you lose your license." The stupidity is laughable. They should think long and hard about getting to that hearing.

@@vivienneb6199 if the actions are not rational they are emotional -> they need to control their emotions

@@vivienneb6199 Censoring free speech through coercive tactics such as attacking a person’s credentials IS irrational. If ideas are “bad” rational people can make that determination on their own. Communication, even of bad ideas, is the fundamental purpose of EVERY SINGLE one of your neurons. Severing a nerve that transmits information about damage to the body without addressing the damage is irrational. That’s what makes “pain killers” so dangerous. Pain is a “bad idea” meant to signify something is wrong. Censorship of that information means the damage goes unattended and can lead to catastrophic failure of the system.

@@vivienneb6199 Do you typically think so small? Of course he won’t stop speaking, but this sets a precedent that less known psychologists will be squelched if they do not comply. Just because they can’t shut ONE psychologist up, you believe it’s ok for them to shut thousands more up?

@@vivienneb6199 I mean…we JUST went through a professional culling regarding COVID where dissenting opinions were met with loss of licenses, clients, and jobs. Why are you so excited about abject tyranny?

@@user-account-not-found I respect your right to freely express your views, even if they are perceived as obviously rude, violent, poorly reasoned, and lacking any meaningful contribution to the conversation, beyond perhaps mild amusement factor due to maladapted trolling. Ty for commenting tho.

@@sinisasub85 ok there

Well said

He's free to speak his mind. He just won't be a representative of Ontario College of Psychologists anymore. I don't know why Peterson cares so much, he barely does any Clinical Psychology and is essentially a paid shill at the moment.

It doesn't seem like you've been paying very close attention. Dr. Grande has slowly but surely begun to reveal his political biases. I think this is a mistake that really detracts from the informative content he has to offer.

Gosh, maybe they'd have to agree to go through some mandatory training in order to maintain their licenses!

if thats real, then u have an awesome job..

🙌😉☺️

@@MrAlipatik I wish, but I was just kidding because the doc kept bringing up the river boat license joke... still you get my point. Anyway, I live in Rio de Janeiro and Im a licensed tour guide. I do ride boats every once in a while but as passenger and mostly on the sea or salty lakes, the later which are full of aligators, but not anywhere near as cool or dangerous as the Amazon river.

Exactly, the point you´re making is very helpful. When your job consist in making statements about some topic, you can be incompetent, malingering or both. No-one says the consequences of your wrong statements immediately. But when you do a practical job, it is very easy for anyone to see what you can do. That´s why so many intellectuals sell nothing else but poison and nonetheless they are exalted like gods.

@@Parmenides100 Thomas Sowell said it better. :-) And the point is: sitting board members should be renowed and respectful members or former workers of its field, not just plain bookworms.

Remember Timothy Leary and Ram Dass! same scenario.. Fired became outcasts, became famous, became counter culture celebrities

@@mritzs5142 Spiritual leaders. Many claim this. Few are influential.

Peterson isn’t nearly as smart as people think he is. But he hasn’t done anything to justify losing his license.

@@TheJosephPrice Maybe, a stern chastising.

@@TheJosephPrice Just watch his Channel 4 Interview and the GQ Interview.... They got 100 million views between them. They are a masterclass in dismantling this woke nonsense. Nothing sits above that. He was the first, the fastest and the most brutal in showing us what was about to happen!

😂 I lol'd at that part as well

J.C. Denton comments on the board members: "Just another parasite"!

I know, the driest sence of humour that I've ever seen since my daughter's doctor!

He did not, in point of fact, bring up or in any way substantively analyze any serious issue. It's genuinely amazing how many people failed to notice this video made no coherent argument, nor even any specific claims, and cited no primary sources at any point. Of course, people who have a favorable opinion of Peterson are exactly the type to fail to notice such glaring intellectual shortcomings.

Yeah, CPO, not C3PO. That's brilliant! I'm thinking he missed the calling to be a standup comic.

@@hadronoftheseus8829 Rather than point you to my comment, I'll copy and paste it here: A few counterpoints: 1) While the CPO is technically a government entity it operates at arm's length from the government. There is s distinct difference which should be made. 2) I belong to a professional organization which cautions against bringing disrepute to the profession. Need I explain the reasoning behind such cautionary advice or the possible consequences to the organization if I ignore this caution? 3) To suggest, as you do (11:00), that the CPO could sanction anyone based on "innocuous social media posts or any type of public statement" beggars belief. Why would they? 4) Following that, to suggest that Peterson's comments about the PM of Canada being a narcissist, that doctors are mutilating transgender patients, or that Elliot Page is causing other transgender people to undergo surgery are innocuous gives a new meaning to the word. 5) You conclude that every statement a professional says "must be factual" (11:00) when that is not what the policy states. There will always be the opportunity to introduce opinions but ones that wantonly ignore or contradict professional research may result in a challenge. 6) We do not know the complete facts of the complaints nor the complainants because the CPO does not make public comments about either. To state, as you do, "that at least a few members of the CPO, perhaps the majority, became aggravated by Jordan's political ideology. It upset them that he had the right to speak freely. Perhaps they thought that right only belonged to people who agreed with them" is not supported by any facts. To further suggest that he was targetted in order to silence him is conjecture.

@@hadronoftheseus8829 Thanks for that. I thought the same.

It wouldn't be hard to find someone who thinks he's a little "out there", but just aren't bothering to tell anyone. It's really beyond the purview of any board, though.

ASSUMING Grande is right and this is just about opinion.

Well see who cancels who, you woke moralist! What Rules? You sons of britches!

I think it's unfair that because of my profession I'm not entitled to speak my mind on certain subjects and am held to a certain standard of behaviour even outside work. But I wouldn't flout the rules and then complain about it because I knew what I was signing up for.

Exactly!!..They do the same ridiculous thing in the crime world. Having witnesses to crimes that aren't the victim, then having these 'non-victim witnesses' report on those crimes is profoundly unfair to the criminals and simply should not happen in the modern world. It's clearly a woke-lefty attack on free-speech, playdough, and beef-burgers.

This guys is very right wing..?

@@taylor11111 Peterson is further right than Grande.

Lol, good one!

I like Dr Grande. He's very knowledgeable and professional.

Lol, oh boy.

Hellah!

Peterson goes beyond merely discussing his political opinions to blatantly lying about both Canadian law and gender affirming healthcare. He is free to be as uncivil as he wishes, but spreading falsehoods brings his profession into disrepute.

@rachaelk.3822 Nonsense. There are zero reasons here as to why his ability to practise should be revoked, despite whether you disagree with him or not. Literally the whole basis for the complaints in the 12 lawsuits are politically motivated! I.e., criticise Justin Trudeau? Point out some inconsistency in climate change policy? Well we'll take your license away. That's the extent of this. None of the complaints levied against him were even clients past or present. If you want to actually be specific regarding the laws/policy in question go and do it! Otherwise understand where this desire to remove him is predicated upon. In other words, there is no basis for this bullshit.

​@@rachaelikwhat laws are Peterson lying about?

It's not about beliefs (that's a strawman argument. It's about being a nut and hurting the image of psychologists. But he is still free to look like a nut on his own time by leaving out the 'Dr' on his tweeting account.

So glad you've found this marvelous corner of RU-vid! But I'll have you know there's more than just a camera and microphone sharing this intelligent space. Those cactuses have lore, and there used to be bricks! 😝🍍

Keep listening - his dry humor will catch you off guard

​@@PFMediaServicesI gotta admit....that may be the nicest decorative cactus display I've ever seen.

No, what it shows is how very easy it is to dupe poorly educated people into perceiving you as intelligent and well spoken.

as a fellow Canadian, we should all be calling these CPO libtards and let them know we support their brilliant member JORDAN PETERSON!

@@christophergrant3887 go sleep Christopher stay in matrix

@@christophergrant3887 They should work to maintain the integrity of their respective domains, however they shouldn't interfere in the realm of politics.

@@christophergrant3887 You are the one who seems to have missed the point of the movie... entirely! What the COP is trying to do to Prof. Peterson is exactly what the agents of the system tried to do to Neo, Morpheus _et al_ !

@@christophergrant3887 I'm just curious, could you explain why they exist exactly and could you describe why dr grande doesn't know what hes talking about? I'm not a professional in the field, but I think that dr grande, as a licensed counselor in the field of mental health, knows what those licensing boards are there for and how they work. A quick research about the College of Psychologists of Ontario also reveals that they carry out the functions mentioned in the video.

Yes. THAT is the state of our world: the Insane psychopaths & sociopaths reign over the peasants, the unworthy.

And Dr Grande asserting it with a straight face😄

@@peg2 ikr, that is his Super Power! But sometimes he barely holds it together. When l see that it always takes me out, lol. 🤣🤣

It was a cheap shot. I've been through ethics training and I can tell you that Peterson has walked a very thin line for a very long time. Everyone with a license knows to be careful with their social media presence and to be careful not to blur the lines. Peterson uses his professional credentials to add credibility to his personal statements and political views. Most of us were smart enough to realize what he was doing. No surprise at all that the groups he targeted and maligned filed complaints against him

You lowly coward LOL, he's misusing his academic and career status to progress his personal and selfish opinions. There's nothing good about that. That's actually a bad person thing. In some accredited schools of thought, that's the spirit of criminality. Who are you? Criminal?

What is funny is often true.

@@yossarian1633 Definitely. I can literally picture how Peterson schools the entire board. Sadly I don't think his eloquence and his wit are going to help him in that situation, they're probably going to take his license.

Only if you're and idiot he buys in double talk and lies. We have Google now. Check his facts

That's what he intended

It made me laugh for a very different reason. In extemporaneous discussion, Peterson is as intellectually defenseless as a limbless infant on a busy freeway. The notion that anyone remotely competent is going to be outclassed by him is risible.

Why is that? I’m a physician and express myself freely without fear of retaliation. In the office setting, I remain professional. Is that what they’re referring to?

Not speaking up is what got us here!

Everyone needs to have some balls. You only live once and we all have to answer to God on judgment day. Jordan is standing up in public just like Christ did.

@@doctorshell7118 Are you a physician in California? In that case your free expressions may well bring retaliation by new law.

That's not what freedom of speech is, jfc

How is it ‘free speech’ to abuse trans people?

Great comment

Agreed 💯%

💯

It is not “free speech” in Canada. In Canada everyone is “guaranteed freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression” within section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

Yup.

There is exactly nothing recent, political, or disturbing about the board's actions. You have no idea what you're on about. What is your education?

@@danhelwig Nope. Not even close.

@@hadronoftheseus8829 What was the piece of misinformation about psychology or unethical behaviour towards a patient that got Peterson in trouble? None. The reason they took his license is 100% political. The anonymous complaints about him were because of comments on a fat model on Twitter and political takes on Joe Rogan's podcast.

Jordan publicly diagnoses people... He call Trudeau a narcissist just today, and he's done it many times to others he hasn't met.

@Christopher Grant you have the right to speak your words, it's others choice to feel offended. Give everyone the same right and choice. It's called freedom of speech.

A organisation which can be influenced by political views of a ruling government.

No one is taking anyone's tongue. They might remove his accreditation, that's it, then he can speak all he wants as a non accredited person.

Like Jordan Peterson?

@@harmonynelson2141 JP is always shouting to ruin woman, uses horrendous adjectives and outdated statistics when this woman are studied, healthy working woman.

I think the worse part isn't that they abuse their power its that they feel obligated and entitled to do so. Most people who snitch or rat on somebody do quietly and covertly but the woke people expect a Congressional medal of Honor for doing it.

Lots of angry Karen’s and Kens these days. JP should not have been judged by non- clients opinions at all. That is just horribly stupid behavior. No licensed professional in any field should be judged by Persons not involved personally. Stop! Hope the Board all lose their credibility and right to an opinion. Take them to court JP.

@@TecOneself No, he isn't shouting to ruin women, you must interpret differently English used by people who are either conservative or are connected to them in some way. When you hear the left you hear: "love love love", when you hear the right you hear: "hate hate hate". Diagnosis: your hearing is damaged, your brain is brainwashed, emotions over logic and facts. Plus you put words into people's mouths they've never said/used. Treatment: stop listening only to 3 groups: mainstream media, the government and the bubble your in (forums/videos that only have opinions close to yours), start listening to moderates and conservatives too. I bet ya you couldn't find the video, where JP is "ruining women", must have mistook him for Andrew Tate. "Ruining women" also depends on your interpretation - if you hate traditional roles, then sure, of course you will hate the guy, or even the nuclear family, then we won't see eye to eye. You hate women who like traditional roles too, and that's a problem, because it's their choice, not yours to decide. Just like with religion, you don't want it shoved down your throat, said women don't want your "f all and do whatever you want" opinion shoved down their throat.

I agree. I thought this was Dr. Grande's best video.

Since JP is being mistreated by this board can he seek a legal remedy? Just wondering what a person's recourse is when things like this go horribly wrong. I have a license in my field and I would be furious if people I've never had dealings with could complain about me and I could lose my license.

@@petrasworld913Well first off, social media cases are a nightmare. They can be very nuanced, due to rights of free speech and the role of the entertainer. Opinion and personal bias can impact case analysis greatly here, as I've witnessed. He could appeal if the outcome is not to his favor, if available. Probably already has a lawyer, which will increase a favorable outcome. If lost, there's most likely a lul before reapplying is possible. Every licensure board is different. Ultimately, the role of boards is to protect the consumer and keep standardized practice. Regulating people's opinions is a slippery slope. As long as his clients aren't complaining and he's not stealing insurance $$$, his social media role shouldn't really matter.

Do you really think JP would be fit to be a therapist after public attacks he’s made on and to individual trans people?

@@graceomalley4 Are they clients receiving services directly from him in a clinical setting?

@@heraprince no entirely sure what you are asking. Could you rephrase please?

@@noorzanayasmin1364 IMO. it's all mental health. Seems the world is going crazy now with all the complaining and belly aching over what other people think and do. Cancel culture and gender confusion----what's next?

There are a lot of videos of his classes while in session, all mental health.

That was a low blow, everything JP shares is based on his own understanding of the psychological forces at play and he can point out to the literature supporting his view. Dr Grande might be feeling a little small, in my opinion. And l am not a fan of Dr Peterson, but in all fairness, that was a bitter low blow unsupported by evidence.

You lowly coward, he's misusing his academic and career status to progress his personal and selfish opinions. There's nothing good about that. That is actually a bad person thing. In some accredited schools of thought, that's the spirit of criminality. Who are you? Criminal?

@Moon Beam I've noticed that his Grande's bias has been creeping in stradily over the last few months. little jabs like this are fine but we'll see if it's more blatant as time goes by.

It is called State sponsored terrorism.

@@danhelwig Um no. It's exactly the sort of professional freedom of boards over workers that conservatives fought hard to achieve. You're welcome!

@@vivienneb6199 youve gotta be joking right... this had to be the most unbiased analysis of the topic.. lmao

@@vivienneb6199 The argument could be made that the board was also paid off or otherwise coerced to tarnish a good man’s name to try and discredit his ideas… You know…ACTUAL ad hominem.

@@vivienneb6199 “It seems to me that he has been paid, one way or another.” You mean like that allegation without any substantiating facts?

❤

“Respect for Dr. Peterson?” 🤦🏻‍♀️ Do you see the shit he tweets on the daily? That dude needs help.

Always a sense of humour!

Quite the recipe for a perfect cake

A "dash"? Dr G always has me laughing throughout.

Agree

And a pinch of shade 💅

yes. more voices are needed for this insanity.

Agreed

​@@barbtheresa5693 to many voices is a sign of insanity

@@yyxy.oncesaid but silencing voices is not going to help either

@@barbtheresa5693 It's also a form of tyranny.

You lowly coward, he's misusing his academic and career status to progress, his personal and selfish opinions. There's nothing good about that. That's actually a bad person thing. In some accredited schools of thought, that's the spirit of criminality. Who are you? Criminal?

Best comment ever!!!

Humour is mankind's best attributes - thanks for the laugh. Perhaps it is the one thing that truly separates us from other animls?

Yes

Nobody is suppressing anything, JP is free to say whatever he wants. But if he expressed bigoted views then he doesn't have the appropriate ethics to practice psychotherapy. You can't call transphobia just a "view" or "opinion". It's bigotry, and it has no place in providing an essential health service. It goes against the CPO code of ethics. Believe it or not, you really aren't allowed to hold unethical views and practice psychotherapy.

Since when has Jordan Peterson ever talked about personal responsibility for one's actions.

@@devinology7 LMAO

@@uanime1 Since always. Maybe you oughta watch some of his lectures.

@@devinology7 You can't call a view or opinion transphobia....

so much simping it's almost unbearable haha

​@@CodeLife_12 Believe they were being sarcastic when typing "enormous intelligence."( Same idea being "you have to have a high iq to watch Rick and Morty.) Or facetious at least. If it is aimed at his vocal minority who make being a JBP fan embarrassing I salute the sentiment. (He speaks about how important it is to avoid becoming resentful... yet he attracts a a good few disaffected men, especially white, so of course they will be resentful. Combine what modern day feminism says (3rd wave mainstream) and how easy it is to be alone as a guy 2day. I ain’t simpiπ, the word Genius is overused and I hesitate to call him such; should be reserved for the likes of men on par w/ Tesla, Da Vinci, Marcus Aurelius, Bernini (best sculptor who lived breathed and pooped on this flat earth), and Kanye West + Kim Kardashian.:3 Does make me sad how people do loathe him, especially if they believe he uses word salads/says a lot while simultaneously saying very little; how he makes simple things complex/can’t provide simple answers.

Enormous intelligence... That's probably ironic, but people giving thumbs up really believe this. :D

@Christopher Grant Exactly. Plus Jordan almost non-stop says stuff that are completely unscientific. He is a clown.

@@ferrisbueller9991 Damn you think Kanye West is a genius? I'm sorry about that. Unless it is sarcasm? I hope so..

Was his name Dr Phil McGraw? If so he lost his licence in the 1990's as part of a plea deal to avoid incarceration after being found guilty of having an inappropriate relationship with a client. He has a long history of spousal abuse.

@@harryricochet8134 He also wrote a book on dieting, pretty good for someone evidently overweight.

She deserved it and liked it

You can’t lose your license for yelling at your wife. If anything they send you to an ethical training class. Lol

I hope you and your husband bonded in the car over how crazy he was lol

Grande is just slightly skeptical of Jordan's philosophical greatness, and reported 150 IQ. I prefer Grande although some of Todd's comments seem to indicate he needs more philosophy reading.

@@JoanWhack Well said.

@@todeskult2818 Oh calm yourself. Grande is a great resource for psychology, just don't expect the same depth when moving to other subjects. Grande was skeptical about Peterson, if you go back you'll see it. Anyhow I know you won't let anything another adult says get in the way of your two heroes. Enjoy.

@@todeskult2818 you do know that popularity has absolutely no bearing on TRUTH... it is a logical fallacy...

Instead of the Ministry of Silly Walks in Monty Python, the CPO board members are recruited based on their talk and have formed the Ministry of Silly Talks 😁

@@griffincontracting Harris is another one bordering on contempt for me aswell. While not as dumb as Peterson dude has become a joke in the critical thinking department himself.

@@griffincontracting Sam who?

@@drummist515 yeah, riiiiight. You don't know who Sam Harris is. I propose that you do know him and his annihilation of Peterson, but you see Peterson as some sort of guru or messiah and you cannot admit he was easily bested in a face-to-face debate by an intellectually superior foe.

we also see him as a benzo addicted pseudo intellectual.

@@griffincontracting See above...

The board has exactly nothing to apologize for.

@@hadronoftheseus8829 agreed. It’s long overdue.

More than an apology. Punishment should fit the crime. Or compensation should fit the damages.

Unlikely for a group of corrupt members who can’t appropriately handle their emotions.

@@peripheralparadox4218 who?

Oh members of the Communist party used it even more, some of them would put their ex wiwes in mental institution just to punish them for being beautiful and to keep them away from their children. Monsters.

@@jelena7440 didn't know that. Horrible.

Well stated Paqui.

@@PaquiPaqui73 oh yes, happened in ex Yugoslavia. He declared her an alcoholic and unfit mother, she spent 20 years locked away. She was one of the most beautiful women in Belgrade, looked a lot like Briggite Bardo, her name was Beba Loncar. He made her give up parental rights at court. Awful disgusting people, communist.

Translation: whenever someone does something they don't like I'll compare them to other people I don't like because I can't make an actual argument.

@@mitthenstein4811 what... are you saying...

@Mitthenstein Transphobia? 🤣🤣🤣 No one cares about those confused and whiny "things." This is why people love Jordan Peterson.

@@christophergrant3887 I think you are conflating the need for professional oversight institutions and the desire to control opinion speech.

@@christophergrant3887 forgive me, I'm in the United States where freedom of speech is right number 1, also written in blood and suffering

@@mitthenstein4811 all of that aside (I don't care what he thinks of Elon Musk), Dr. Peterson boldly represents a sizable part of society, for better or worse, like it or not. He isn't an outlier with fringe ideas. Millions of people agree with him, in whole or in part, and those millions deserve a voice. If you don't like what he has to say, then debate him point for point (please, not in comments...), and see if you can gather a substantial enough following to matter (no offense intended, my opinions rarely matter either, if ever).

BINGO

Which can be argued as being a justifiable use of the board's power if such a big influencer had been using their accreditation to spread falsehoods.

And he needs to be silenced, he is a quack

@@mikemhzyeah people keep d riding influencers and acting as if institutions aren’t made up of people as well. And an institution has the right to divorce themselves from alumni if there is no longer brand or intellectual synergy.

lmao his trans views match up with nazis soo

He must be summoned immediately to the official authoritative commissionary official board of dirtectors authority of all idustries (including riverboat pilots) for his misuse of all things relatied to public engagement, thoughts included for a hearing this instant.... to determine the validity of his license to practice psychology profressionally. It will be officially and publicly know and "the trial" by Franz something something

And he’s so humorous.

Truth!

Good, finally somebody who uses terms like a PhD. Not some political bs.

Cancelation, cancel culture, woke, wokism and some other trigger words I can't think of right now. There. I went where no Dr. Grande dared to go...

I need more info on this before making a final judgement including what all the complaints were about Peterson. But if Peterson is being silenced by the govt what do they want him silenced for? What’s the concern?

@@jtem9313 I'm not saying that all the words aren't 100 percent appropriate in the analysis of the situation... Most psychological associations and boards these days are totally captured by the ideologies Peterson speaks out against. Dr G just reframed it as abuse of power for speech and thought control.

Their targeting of Jordan Peterson is 💯 politically motivated.

Right! He’s standing in the gap for all. He’s using his clout to pave the way for us all. Thank God for his courage and honesty.

Exactly. Canada is using Peterson as an example for the other people who would not be able to bounce back after having their professional licenses revoked. “If we can do this to the most published and most followed psychologist in the world, imagine what we can do to you”. Reminds me of my parents’ days in the Soviet Union. Scary times indeed.

At 2 universities I attended the female professors would say things like a man cannot be raped by a woman he always likes it. Unbelievable shit like that. when I hope up as an assault survivor I was mocked. Lovely.

Haha, it's funny you say that when considering all the context, everything that is happening are just consequences of his actions. If you want to actively deny the plight of LGBTQ people, and children, especially in the field he's in, I think you should have your licenses taken no questions asked. He's harmed more people negatively through his rhetoric then he's ever helped in a professional light.

Those professionals you spoke about. Actually they do have a social status platform to defend themselves. They just need to united with J.Peterson.

I think that should be his condition: "I'll pay for my "RE-EDUCATION" as long as I can film you while you show the world your professional TRANSPARENCY!" JP will become even RICHER!

@@MsElke11as fun as that sounds, his contention is that he hasn’t, which by any reasonable standard he has not. In their twisted minds, it’s not the case, but most of all they are trying to force addition that he has broken a reasonable standard just by attending.

I wish.

@Christopher Grant That's something meant for patients, yes. Outside of that, no, there aren't actually limits of conduct like this (assuming you aren't working within a particular organization... like a business, not those providing the license, hope that's obvious).

I thought this too. It would be entertaining if it wasn't so sickening.

Wow really? Do you have any link to this information? 😳

The provisions of Part two, Section 2 of the MHA 1983 does not facilitate a voluntary informal inpatient admission, but rather involuntary detention aka 'Sectioning'. Section 2 is to facilitate an assessment of the detainee's mental health for a period of time not exceeding 28 days. This may lead to further detention subject to Section 3 for the purpose of treatment of a diagnosed medical MH condition or conditions. That is not to say that treatment cannot occur under S2 however certain requirements have to be met.

The UK is so criss-crossed with checks and double-checks that there's practically no room for abuse. Speeds up the process and gets dangerous people off the streets quicker

Wow! A tremendous amount of pier in one persons hands can literally condemn the stable and innocent to lock-up. Shocking there is no panel of 3 minimum and a private hearing with judge of equal or greater degree in the same field. What is happening to our worlds

@@ninajanson8097 Claim you.

Interesting spelling of 'insightful!' lol

Taht's 'insightful', most definitely not 'inciteful' lol

I never heard about this case in the USA. But I just went and read a synopsis. Okay she played a clip of a debate about a Canadian law that was being passed. The debate showed positions for the bills and against the bill. She herself said I am neutral and want to hear your thoughts on the bill and the debate. A student told a counselor it made them uncomfortable. That's the point of discussing topics -to learn new things about topics that might be uncomfortable and maybe change your mind! I am glad she won the case, and I'm glad he did too! They both sued the school! She sued for hostile work environment and he sued for defamation.

You lowly coward, he's misusing his academic and career status to progress his personal and selfish opinions. There's nothing good about that. That's actually a bad person thing. In some accredited schools of thought, that's the spirit of criminality. Who are you? Criminal?

@BLACK JESUS Gosh, isn't that how psychoanalysis works more better?

THANKYOU , THAT EXPLAINS A LOT !

@BLACK JESUS His analytic work is private between him and his client. You may as well ask "do you see his liking of chess blending in with his psychoanalytic work."

You lowly coward, he's misusing his academic and career status to progress his personal, and selfish opinions. There's nothing good about that. That's actually a bad person thing. In some accredited schools of thought, that's the spirit of criminality. Who are you? Criminal?

Should've missed out the first sentence. No one needs to know.

@@laurastuart3814 She has the right to her opinion and she is showing that you can disagree with someone and still support their freedom of speech.

What do you disagree with him on?

Exactly, it's not about whether you agree with JP or not, it's about the abuse of power. The governing bodies that oversees licensing for psychiatrists and all kinds of professionals are there to protect the public and the profession. Weaponizing the system against your political opponents is intolerable.

@@Catlily5 you're probably a trans bathroom activist 😭😭😭😭😭🤬🤬🤬🤬

That would be weird because I could potentially see that if a woman does it because you could infer she's hiding the diamond but men's wedding rings are just the same design all the way around.

FFS

Source?

On the contrary, JP has had enormous success helping people learn to organize their lives, set goals, take on responsibilities and live with more generosity towards others. As I understand it, none of the registered complaints against JP have been from his thousands of patients. That is saying a lot.

Obviously, you haven't listened to JP much as you're quoting the progressive left's narrative of him (which I discovered is highly inaccurate). He's not "campaigning" against groups of people; he's campaigning against the progressive left's Orwellian mindset that YOU MUST AGREE WITH OR YOU ARE racist/bigoted/sexist/etc.

He's one of the few actual practicing Jungian analytical psychologist.

What they are doing is actually correct. When you have a license, you sign an oath to remain professional. Talking about your drug addiction and misgendering people online isn't professional, it's literally against the oath 🙄

Well he lied and gave misinformation about veganism.

@@rosiekapun207 in future when society collapses due to all these matriachy nonsense, I hope y'all will take responsibility. Cos I can't imagine anyone with a brain trying to justify this nonsense.

@@rosiekapun207 if you had a job, would you be happy if you were being cancelled cos some guys complained about you??? Cos that's what radical left weaklings are doing. Making a fuss cos y'all are scared of his perfectly logical views

AWESOME !!!!!

It certain shadows Orwell’s 1984

We need that kind of support for Peterson. He has a huge fanbase, but I esp. respect more neutral parties that care about what is right, rather than just who they support in all things. This is crazy.

@@sylviaowega3839 Not as much as Republicans trying to erase history from the classroom.

Oh please, he isn't the first or last therapist to lose his license for saying dumb shit. To even suggest this is Orwellian is hyperbole.

If you drink a fifth of vodka and drive down the wrong side of the road, you lose your drivers license. There is nothing Orwellian about it.

Would definitely want to see that.

It would be a huge waste of time for Dr. Grande. He doesn’t want to attract right-wing bigots to his following.

Debates are not competitions to bamboozle someone. Those who find this powerful love Peterson and pretend to know what he is talking about.

@@ALT-vz3jn totally agree

@@ALT-vz3jn if that were true then the 'right wing bigots' could probably learn something from Dr Grande...if you want to have a positive influence on the world you have to get through to those people, not write them off and keep preaching to the choir....

Worse, the foundations of their institution.

I agree. Jordan could probably teach them.

People like his attackers never loose. If only because their victims lack support

Given that the law is vague expect Peterson to lose and lose badly.

Ha, no, they won't. It doesn't work that way, they are the only legally sanctioned body to regulate the profession. You aren't legally allowed to practice without licensing. This will not change because of one controversial case.

Well! Yes he has in most all of his work!