Тёмный

Why Jehovah's Witnesses are wrong about The Trinity: Part 2 

Light over Dark Ministry
Подписаться 6 тыс.
Просмотров 4,3 тыс.
50% 1

📖 In this 2nd Part of this Chicken Scratch, I'll be covering the Jehovah's Witness "evidence" on why the Trinity was taken from Paganism. As you'll see, it's mostly lies and labeling.
View Part 1 here --- • Why Jehovah's Witnesse...
🤝 Join the Conversation:
We welcome your thoughts, comments, and experiences related to this topic. Please share your insights in the comments section below and engage in respectful and constructive dialogue with fellow viewers.
👍 Like, Share, and Subscribe:
If you found this video informative or thought-provoking, please consider hitting the "like" button and sharing it with friends who may also find it intriguing. Don't forget to subscribe to our channel for more insightful discussions on a variety of topics.
🌐 Stay Connected:
Connect with us on our social media platforms for updates, behind-the-scenes content, and more. [Insert Links to Your Social Media]
📣 Disclaimer:
This video is intended for educational and informational purposes, and it represents the views of the creator. It's important to approach discussions about religious beliefs with sensitivity and respect.
#JehovahsWitnesses #exjw #pimo #jehovahswitness

Опубликовано:

 

1 фев 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 906   
@RowanTasmanian
@RowanTasmanian 4 месяца назад
This is a Masterclass in how apologetics is really taught and how the doctrine of the Trinity has been misrepresented by groups like the Watchtower and Mormons etc. Having a latte and getting top notch apologetics when I wake up, my day is off to a brilliant start. Just Brilliant D H. Thanks mate.
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
Babylonia "The ancient Babylonians recognised the doctrine of a trinity, or three persons in one god-as appears from a composite god with three heads forming part of their mythology, and the use of the equilateral triangle, also, as an emblem of such trinity in unity" (Thomas Dennis Rock, The Mystical Woman and the Cities of the Nations, 1867, pp. 22-23).
@evanwindom3265
@evanwindom3265 4 месяца назад
@@Mr.DC3.1914 Yeah, so? The Babylonians believing in a trinity doesn't make it the origin of anyone else's. Chefs call the combination of onion, celery and green pepper "the trinity". I suppose next you'll be telling us that the origin of the Trinity doctrine is a cable TV cooking channel?
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
@@evanwindom3265 Wonder why the pagans such as in Babylonia used the term THREE PERSONS IN ONE GOD, BUT NEVER FOUND IN THE BIBLE?
@Rispor427
@Rispor427 4 месяца назад
@@Mr.DC3.1914 you are right to say the term three persons one God is not found in the bible. According to your logic if the word is not found in the bible therefore the doctrine is not in the bible. If you can find me governing body in the scriptures I will become a Jehovah Witness right now.
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
@@Rispor427 THE gREEK WORD used in Heb 13:17 hegeomai also means GOVERNOR, and since those who lead (govern) are part of the BODY of Christ, thus the modern term of GOVERNing BODY. The Bible NEVER DEFINEs THREE PERSONS for GOD, it is ALWAYS SINGULAR, SINGULAR PROSOPO which means face OR PERSON. and ONE JEHOVAH and NEVER Three Jehovah , thus the terM TRI-THREE PERSONS for GOD is wrong - Deut 6:4
@joJo56976
@joJo56976 4 месяца назад
Thank you for exposing their satanic lies. I am so grateful to my Lord and Savior and I pray that he will deliver all his deceived sheep.
@benjaminfalzon4622
@benjaminfalzon4622 4 месяца назад
No, he did not. Read John 10:30.Where Jesus said, "I and the Father are one". The Jehovah's Witnesses cult is full of lies, but the debunking of Tirnity isn't among their lies.
@rebeccabacalso4536
@rebeccabacalso4536 4 месяца назад
When saying I and the Father are one doesn't mean in person Read John 17:21 22
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
Babylonia "The ancient Babylonians recognised the doctrine of a trinity, or three persons in one god-as appears from a composite god with three heads forming part of their mythology, and the use of the equilateral triangle, also, as an emblem of such trinity in unity" (Thomas Dennis Rock, The Mystical Woman and the Cities of the Nations, 1867, pp. 22-23).
@evanwindom3265
@evanwindom3265 4 месяца назад
@@Mr.DC3.1914 Yeah, so? The Babylonians believing in a trinity doesn't make it the origin of anyone else's. Chefs call the combination of onion, celery and green pepper "the trinity". I suppose next you'll be telling us that the origin of the Trinity doctrine is a cable TV cooking channel?
@benjaminfalzon4622
@benjaminfalzon4622 4 месяца назад
@@rebeccabacalso4536 John 17:21-22 Says the same thing as John 10;30 What Jesus is saying is. "The Father is in him, and Jesus is in the Father". It doesn't mention a third person whatsoever." Then Jesus says: That the Father and Jesus will both be in those who believe", meaning true Christians.
@consumedbyfire1359
@consumedbyfire1359 Месяц назад
Part 2? As if Part 1 was not thorough enough!? Fantastic work and research.
@gabbie921
@gabbie921 2 месяца назад
I love how you encouraged people to read material anti and pro of their beliefs and then come to their own conclusion :) Reminds me of the boreans, who researched everything they heard.
@user-ut5xh3yx5h
@user-ut5xh3yx5h 4 месяца назад
I haven't watched the video yet, but I'm already anticipating that it will be great!!!
@user-ut5xh3yx5h
@user-ut5xh3yx5h 4 месяца назад
yes, I was right, this video was great, it blew my mind))) Thank you!!!!!
@evanwindom3265
@evanwindom3265 4 месяца назад
@@-JehovahsWord- Hi Gabriel. I checked out your channel. It's interesting to me that you make multiple comments on someone else's video, but on your channel, comments are TURNED OFF for five out of the six videos. That seems a little one-sided. If what you're saying in your videos is the truth, should it not stand up to challenges and scrutiny, and even INVITE them? Is your position not strong enough to stand up to other viewpoints? Are you afraid of what others might say? Do you really want a channel where only your voice is heard? That's a really fast way to turn people off to your channel. Most people don't want to enter into a one-way dialogue, though I know that's how JW's prefer it. I guess I'm supposed to just shut up and listen, right? I'll pass.
@STROND
@STROND 4 месяца назад
Yes it blew my mind too, but all for the wrong reasons !
@jimjuri6490
@jimjuri6490 4 месяца назад
@@STROND : Mine too. Even over a thousand years of having fallen for the Nicean Council's adoption of the Trinity theory, people are still trying to make sense of it. Rather than call a spade a spade and move on, mind blowing excuses are looked around for to prop up this 'perverse teaching' (Acts 20:30 - KJ). The fact that these debates seem to never end makes it obvious that the Trinity has no substance in Bible teaching. That is why even these debaters cannot agree among themselves. We never find the 1st Century Christians ever engaged in debates about who Jesus was. Nor the worship of Jesus or the holy spirit ever mentioned among those in the established Christian Congregation.
@aaronwood8012
@aaronwood8012 4 месяца назад
This is one of the best videos on this topic I’ve seen
@CherylArsenault123
@CherylArsenault123 4 месяца назад
Amen! You sum it up well! I pray they heed the call of God to come out and be saved the only way of God's holy scriptures as it is written!
@jimjuri6490
@jimjuri6490 4 месяца назад
What does saved mean? Must know to tell them.
@CherylArsenault123
@CherylArsenault123 4 месяца назад
@@jimjuri6490 Should do a study on salvation/saved. Here's some that come to mind. To have eternal life is eternal salvation. To obey the Lord Jesus Christ and his gospel of the new covenant. The name of Jesus is above all names. (Philippians 2:12) The name of Jesus is the only name by which we are saved. (Acts 4:12) Partake of holy communion, the Lord's supper, the bread and the wine. John 6:54 King James Version 54 Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day. Hebrews 5:9 King James Version 9 And being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him;
@WakeingUp
@WakeingUp 4 месяца назад
Finally! Its been two weeks! 😉
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
WHO IS OVER ALL? Ephesians 4:6 one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all. GOD and FATHER is OVER/ABOVE ALL and that "All" includes the SON so they are NOT EQUAL THE BIBLE teaches that Jesus was MADE As Lord and Christ and as Son (ACTS 2:36, Prov 8, HEB 1:5), CREATED/PRODUCED/INSTALLED (Prov 8) , COME INTO BEING/MADE (Mat 21:42 - egeneto) and GIVEN LIFE by the Father - John 5:26 and it uses TODAY (Heb 1:5), and uses future tenses and is a prophecy in Isa 9:6 (Isa 9:6, - WILL BE) . If you are called MADE AND CREATED AND GIVEN LIFE, and NEVER CALLED in the BIBLE as Creator or Maker , then you are A CREATION. ALL FROM THE BIBLE From the Lord was this (this is referring to the chief cornerstone who is Jesus) , the word WAS is egeneto (made or came into being) - Matthew 21:42 and the exact Greek word used in John 1:3 - MADE, egeneto (came into being) - JESUS WAS MADE/CAME INTO BEING FROM THE FATHER , yes, Jesus was MADE/CREATED!, See also Acts 2:36, Heb 1:5, 1 john 5 Isa 9:6 the word Prince in the Prince of Peace means PATRON ANGEL also Leader. WHO IS the ONE LEADER that we have? Jesus. Now, that same exact Hebrew word was used for Daniel 12:1 which is used for Michael the Archangel. So are you saying there are MANY LEADERS now?
@peterbrooks7120
@peterbrooks7120 4 месяца назад
JW’s have their own definition of “lie” among other words. That might make good subject matter for a video.
@Vapememes
@Vapememes 4 месяца назад
7:52 This was way funnier than it had any reason to be. Great video btw, well researched and good production value.
@devinmedeiros9466
@devinmedeiros9466 3 месяца назад
i am a ex jw and i love jesus christ so very very much
@ryanhegseth8720
@ryanhegseth8720 3 месяца назад
As a Star Trek fan it’s really easy for me to understand how God talks about himself. The Borg collective, Locutis and the borg Queen would speak exactly like God does. The collective spans space and time, Locutis is the Borg left with his humanity partially in tact to better understand and relate to humans and the borg Queen the one individual who can both think and feel. The collective would speak with a booming voice, billions speaking as one. If the collective were to create something they would say “let us…”
@LightoverDarkMinistry
@LightoverDarkMinistry 3 месяца назад
As a Trek fan myself, I must agree.
@kableguy5525
@kableguy5525 Месяц назад
Really? Hmmm...... star trek used now to explain the Trinity? I speak to my wife and say "let us" do such and such. Doesn't make us the same person.
@ThePrairieChronicles
@ThePrairieChronicles 24 дня назад
@@kableguy5525 Nabeel Qureshi explained the Trinity very well. I hope you can watch his video. He starts with how God is one Being in three Persons, and how you, for example, are a human being, and your person is "kableguy", and expands from there.
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 4 месяца назад
200 AD Tertullian "Never did any angel descend for the purpose of being crucified, of tasting death, and of rising again from the dead." (The Flesh of Christ, ch 6) 200 AD Tertullian "All the Scriptures give clear proof of the Trinity, and it is from these that our principle is deduced...the distinction of the Trinity is quite clearly displayed." (Against Praxeas, ch 11) 200 AD Tertullian "The origins of both his substances display him as man and as God: from the one, born, and from the other, not born" (The Flesh of Christ, 5:6-7). 200 AD Tertullian "[God speaks in the plural 'Let us make man in our image'] because already there was attached to Him his Son, a second person, his own Word, and a third, the Spirit in the Word....one substance in three coherent persons. He was at once the Father, the Son, and the Spirit." (Against Praxeas, ch 12) 200 AD Tertullian "Thus the connection of the Father in the Son, and of the Son in the Paraclete, produces three coherent Persons, who are yet distinct One from Another. These Three are, one essence, not one Person, as it is said, 'I and my Father are One' [John 10:30], in respect of unity of Being not singularity of number" (Against Praxeas, 25) 200 AD Tertullian "As if in this way also one were not All, in that All are of One, by unity (that is) of substance; while the mystery of the dispensation is still guarded, which distributes the Unity into a Trinity, placing in their order the three Persons - the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost: three, however, not in condition, but in degree; not in substance, but in form; not in power, but in aspect; yet of one substance, and of one condition, and of one power, inasmuch as He is one God, from whom these degrees and forms and aspects are reckoned, under the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost." (Against Praxeas, by Tertullian)
@jimjuri6490
@jimjuri6490 4 месяца назад
(Acts 20:30) and from among you yourselves men will rise and speak twisted things to draw away the disciples after themselves. Obviously Tertullian would qualify.
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 4 месяца назад
@@jimjuri6490 Are you sure?
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
WHO IS OVER ALL? Ephesians 4:6 one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all. GOD and FATHER is OVER/ABOVE ALL and that "All" includes the SON so they are NOT EQUAL THE BIBLE teaches that Jesus was MADE As Lord and Christ and as Son (ACTS 2:36, Prov 8, HEB 1:5), CREATED/PRODUCED/INSTALLED (Prov 8) , COME INTO BEING/MADE (Mat 21:42 - egeneto) and GIVEN LIFE by the Father - John 5:26 and it uses TODAY (Heb 1:5), and uses future tenses and is a prophecy in Isa 9:6 (Isa 9:6, - WILL BE) . If you are called MADE AND CREATED AND GIVEN LIFE, and NEVER CALLED in the BIBLE as Creator or Maker , then you are A CREATION. ALL FROM THE BIBLE From the Lord was this (this is referring to the chief cornerstone who is Jesus) , the word WAS is egeneto (made or came into being) - Matthew 21:42 and the exact Greek word used in John 1:3 - MADE, egeneto (came into being) - JESUS WAS MADE/CAME INTO BEING FROM THE FATHER , yes, Jesus was MADE/CREATED!, See also Acts 2:36, Heb 1:5, 1 john 5 Isa 9:6 the word Prince in the Prince of Peace means PATRON ANGEL also Leader. WHO IS the ONE LEADER that we have? Jesus. Now, that same exact Hebrew word was used for Daniel 12:1 which is used for Michael the Archangel. So are you saying there are MANY LEADERS now?
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
from TERTULLIAN - But if this same Wisdom is the Word of God, in the capacity of Wisdom, and (as being He) without whom nothing was made, just as also (nothing) was set in order without Wisdom, how can it be that anything, except the Father, should be OLDER, and on this account indeed NOBLER, than the Son of God, the only-begotten and first-begotten Word? Not to say that what is unbegotten is STRONGER than that which is BORN (this is Jesus) , and what is not made more powerful than that which is MADE ( JESUS) . Because that which did not require a Maker to give it existence, will be much more ELEVATED in rank than that which had an AUTHOR TO BRING IT INTO BEING (JESUS)
@richbaker7187
@richbaker7187 4 месяца назад
@@Mr.DC3.1914 Please give the actual quote reference. Do you even have it? I think not, as you are a squeamish little cut- and-paste cowgirl.
@EscapetoFaith
@EscapetoFaith 4 месяца назад
Awesome video mate, amazing apologetics! Video's like this make it so much easier to have stepping stones for people who are challenging their indoctrinated beliefs.
@mre1991
@mre1991 4 месяца назад
Man, this was 🔥!
@dianeexley1709
@dianeexley1709 4 месяца назад
Awesome video!
@jeremiahrowesr.3130
@jeremiahrowesr.3130 4 месяца назад
What's even funnier is that their own New world translation teaches the doctrine of the Trinity so I don't know why they get so mad about that.
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
Babylonia "The ancient Babylonians recognised the doctrine of a trinity, or three persons in one god-as appears from a composite god with three heads forming part of their mythology, and the use of the equilateral triangle, also, as an emblem of such trinity in unity" (Thomas Dennis Rock, The Mystical Woman and the Cities of the Nations, 1867, pp. 22-23).
@evanwindom3265
@evanwindom3265 4 месяца назад
@@Mr.DC3.1914 Yeah, so? The Babylonians believing in a trinity doesn't make it the origin of anyone else's. Chefs call the combination of onion, celery and green pepper "the trinity". I suppose next you'll be telling us that the origin of the Trinity doctrine is a cable TV cooking channel?
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
@@evanwindom3265 Wonder why the pagans such as in Babylonia used the term THREE PERSONS IN ONE GOD, BUT NEVER FOUND IN THE BIBLE?
@mo2874
@mo2874 4 месяца назад
What's really funny is that you can't prove that. When you try to watch how the bible will shut it down....
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
@@mo2874 which PERSON OF GOD is talking here? If there are TWO more persons of GOD, then for you this person of GOD is lying. I am Jehovah, and there is no one else. There is no God except me. - ISA 45:5
@allandahma4825
@allandahma4825 4 месяца назад
They immediately go to this nonsense anytime you bring up Holy Spirit, or try to show them that Jesus is God. They are so indoctrinated they can’t even consider what the Bible clearly says 💔🙏🙏
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
WHO IS OVER ALL? Ephesians 4:6 one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all. GOD and FATHER is OVER/ABOVE ALL and that "All" includes the SON so they are NOT EQUAL THE BIBLE teaches that Jesus was MADE As Lord and Christ and as Son (ACTS 2:36, Prov 8, HEB 1:5), CREATED/PRODUCED/INSTALLED (Prov 8) , COME INTO BEING/MADE (Mat 21:42 - egeneto) and GIVEN LIFE by the Father - John 5:26 and it uses TODAY (Heb 1:5), and uses future tenses and is a prophecy in Isa 9:6 (Isa 9:6, - WILL BE) . If you are called MADE AND CREATED AND GIVEN LIFE, and NEVER CALLED in the BIBLE as Creator or Maker , then you are A CREATION. ALL FROM THE BIBLE From the Lord was this (this is referring to the chief cornerstone who is Jesus) , the word WAS is egeneto (made or came into being) - Matthew 21:42 and the exact Greek word used in John 1:3 - MADE, egeneto (came into being) - JESUS WAS MADE/CAME INTO BEING FROM THE FATHER , yes, Jesus was MADE/CREATED!, See also Acts 2:36, Heb 1:5, 1 john 5 Isa 9:6 the word Prince in the Prince of Peace means PATRON ANGEL also Leader. WHO IS the ONE LEADER that we have? Jesus. Now, that same exact Hebrew word was used for Daniel 12:1 which is used for Michael the Archangel. So are you saying there are MANY LEADERS now?
@kennynoNope
@kennynoNope 4 месяца назад
@@Mr.DC3.1914why are you spamming this? Your god is Charles Taze Russell I don’t think you have room to talk.
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
@@kennynoNope Nope, you are wrong. Our Father is Jehovah - Isa 63:16 and He is the one who SENT Jesus his SON - Jesus
@STROND
@STROND 4 месяца назад
​@@kennynoNopeWhen you attack the person rather than the argument, you have already LOST !
@kennynoNope
@kennynoNope 4 месяца назад
@@Mr.DC3.1914 nope. I’m not wrong Charles Taze Russell started your group in the late 1800s. And said the world would end in 1914. This is the group your proud of being in?
@JLGeorge101
@JLGeorge101 Месяц назад
James 4:11 " Speak not evil one of another, brethren. He that speaketh evil of his brother, and judgeth his brother, speaketh evil of the law, and judgeth the law: but if thou judge the law, thou art not a doer of the law, but a judge." KJV
@Mrs.dat4302
@Mrs.dat4302 4 месяца назад
Excellent research, clearly explained, and very helpful. Thank you for another well done video.
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 4 месяца назад
Full quote from Fortman: "They give us no formal or formulated doctrine of the Trinity, no explicit teaching that in one God there are three co-equal divine persons. But they do give us an elemental trinitarianism, the data from which such a formal doctrine of the Triune God may be formulated."
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
Babylonia "The ancient Babylonians recognised the doctrine of a trinity, or three persons in one god-as appears from a composite god with three heads forming part of their mythology, and the use of the equilateral triangle, also, as an emblem of such trinity in unity" (Thomas Dennis Rock, The Mystical Woman and the Cities of the Nations, 1867, pp. 22-23).
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 4 месяца назад
@@Mr.DC3.1914 Hello, DC3. Do you have a crush on me? If so, I'm not gay.
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
@@misterauctor7353 u r nar·​cis·​sist
@evanwindom3265
@evanwindom3265 4 месяца назад
@@Mr.DC3.1914 Yeah, so? The Babylonians believing in a trinity doesn't make it the origin of anyone else's. Chefs call the combination of onion, celery and green pepper "the trinity". I suppose next you'll be telling us that the origin of the Trinity doctrine is a cable TV cooking channel?
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 4 месяца назад
@@Mr.DC3.1914 How?
@richbaker7187
@richbaker7187 4 месяца назад
This video, and its predecessor, shows the pore hatred of the trolls in the comment section for the True nature of God; Father, Son and Holy Spirit. It should be eye opening how the childish trolls like DC and STROND and now, the little "g" Gabriel, so to such great lengths to IGNORE the content of the video, and throw their little cut-and-paste "scholarship" out there, as if they have the slightest clue what they are talking about. This is the matter that is SOOOO important, because WHAT you believe about the nature of Christ, determines your eternal future. Jesus said, "Unless you believe that I AM, you will die in your sins." John 8:24. Notice the word "He" is NOT in the text. For those of us that believe the biblical doctrine of the Godhead, it really doesn't matter if the word "He" is used or not. But for the Arain Keyboard Army of Trolls, it does. Attacking the True nature of Christ by citing obscure quotes from non-trinitarian sources, and using partial quotes and ellipses from real trinitarian, in order to try and manipulate what the author actually said into something they did NOT say, is the latest "fiery dart" in the quiver of the scum-bag trolls that will never cease trying to push their lies, until they come to an abrupt halt in take of fire, where they are headed. I bet DC will still be there in hell trying to support his WT belief system, telling Satan he should follow the WT.
@RowanTasmanian
@RowanTasmanian 4 месяца назад
G'day Rich, very well said. I also think we need to point out to these individuals that they are polytheists believing in 2 Gods. None of these people will directly answer this simple question: "How many Gods do you believe in ? is Jesus a God according to you and Jehovah another God ?" I don't bother debating the Trinity with them . I want to always debate their belief in 2 Gods. Keep well my friend.
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
WHO IS OVER ALL? Ephesians 4:6 one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all. GOD and FATHER is OVER/ABOVE ALL and that "All" includes the SON so they are NOT EQUAL THE BIBLE teaches that Jesus was MADE As Lord and Christ and as Son (ACTS 2:36, Prov 8, HEB 1:5), CREATED/PRODUCED/INSTALLED (Prov 8) , COME INTO BEING/MADE (Mat 21:42 - egeneto) and GIVEN LIFE by the Father - John 5:26 and it uses TODAY (Heb 1:5), and uses future tenses and is a prophecy in Isa 9:6 (Isa 9:6, - WILL BE) . If you are called MADE AND CREATED AND GIVEN LIFE, and NEVER CALLED in the BIBLE as Creator or Maker , then you are A CREATION. ALL FROM THE BIBLE From the Lord was this (this is referring to the chief cornerstone who is Jesus) , the word WAS is egeneto (made or came into being) - Matthew 21:42 and the exact Greek word used in John 1:3 - MADE, egeneto (came into being) - JESUS WAS MADE/CAME INTO BEING FROM THE FATHER , yes, Jesus was MADE/CREATED!, See also Acts 2:36, Heb 1:5, 1 john 5 Isa 9:6 the word Prince in the Prince of Peace means PATRON ANGEL also Leader. WHO IS the ONE LEADER that we have? Jesus. Now, that same exact Hebrew word was used for Daniel 12:1 which is used for Michael the Archangel. So are you saying there are MANY LEADERS now?
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
from TERTULLIAN - square brackets mine. - But if this same Wisdom is the Word of God, in the capacity of Wisdom, and (as being He) without whom nothing was made, just as also (nothing) was set in order without Wisdom, how can it be that anything, except the Father, should be OLDER, and on this account indeed NOBLER, than the Son of God, the only-begotten and first-begotten Word? Not to say that what is unbegotten is STRONGER than that which is BORN ([this is Jesus]) , and what is not made more powerful than that which is MADE ([ JESUS]) . Because that which did not require a Maker to give it existence, will be much more ELEVATED in rank than that which had an AUTHOR TO BRING IT INTO BEING ([JESUS])
@richbaker7187
@richbaker7187 4 месяца назад
@@Mr.DC3.1914 Same ol' "cut and paste" nonsense there Skippy! Bless your heart.
@richbaker7187
@richbaker7187 4 месяца назад
@@Mr.DC3.1914 Of course the square brackets are yours. Tertullian didn't say Jesus was created, you do. Now you ae putting words into his mouth, just like the WT, and he can't defend himself, because he's dead. Oh, wait, but we have his actual writings. He said, "For God alone is without sin; and the only man without sin is Christ, since Christ is also God." Treatise on the Soul, 41 Notice I didn't have to use any brackets? Oh, here's another one Skippy. "Thus Christ is Spirit of Spirit, and God of God, as light of light is kindled.... That which has come forth out of God is at once God and the Son of God, and the two are one. In this way also, as He is Spirit of Spirit and God of God, He is made a second in manner of existence-in position, not in nature; and He did not withdraw from the original source, but went forth. This ray of God, then, as it was always foretold in ancient times, descending into a certain virgin, and made flesh in her womb, is in His birth God and man united." Apology, 21 I didn't have to put any brackets in to change what he said. He plainly taught the trinity concept; Father, Son and Holy Spirit are all God, ONE God, but the Son is subject to the Father, because he went forth FROM the Father. That's what the Logos is; it's not an angel. But let's take your original quote you posted and keep reading. Did you do that Skippy? Are you so blind you can't even read the whole quote in context? Your quote came from Against Hermogenes", and you cut the middle out of the whole quote you moron. Typical JW who only takes partial quotes and uses them for their own heresies. Take a look at the rest of the quote there Skippy. it goes on to say, "On this principle, then, if evil is indeed unbegotten, whilst the Son of God is begotten (“for,” says God, “my heart hath emitted my most excellent Word”, I am not quite sure that evil may not be introduced by good, the stronger by the weak, in the same way as the unbegotten is by the begotten. Therefore on this ground Hermogenes puts Matter even before God, by putting it before the Son. Because the Son is the Word, and “the Word is God,” and “I and my Father are one.”. But after all, perhaps, the Son will patiently enough submit to having that preferred before Him which (by Hermogenes), is made equal to the Father!" So you left out an important part of the letter. Tertullian was showing how Hermogenes taught matter was older than god altogether. He was using Hermogenes' opinion to show how futile it was, as Tertullian taught the Word WAS GOD, and eternal. Want to try and cut-and-past another partial quote from the Early Church Fathers? The WT does this emphatically, as you just repeat it like the WT magpie you are.
@NotNecessarily-ip4vc
@NotNecessarily-ip4vc 4 месяца назад
*"It is impossible for a contradictory thing to be true.* A non-contradictory thing could be true or could be false depending on context but at least has the *possibility* of being true." -me, I said that ❌️Contradictory Theology, Mathematics and Physics❌️ (Knowing Good; Functions; limit built into every operation): 1. The Genesis 1 character and the Genesis 2 character are the exact same character. 2. Zero is not fundamental and nonzero numbers are fundamental (Newton calculus). 3. 0D is not locally real and 1D, 2D, 3D, 4D are locally real (Newton physics). ✅️Non-contradictory Theology, Mathematics and Physics✅️ (Knowing Good from Evil; Relations defined by constraints; limit is a separate operation): 1. The Genesis 1 character and the Genesis 2 character are polar opposite characters. 2. Zero is fundamental and nonzero numbers are not fundamental (Leibniz calculus). 3. 0D is locally real and 1D, 2D, 3D, 4D are not locally real (Leibniz physics). [Materialism/Empiricism version of Religion]: Interpreting the Bible with the Genesis 1 character and the Genesis 2 character as the exact same character generates near 70,000 contradictions (see reason project) and requires heavy apologetics. A Bible interpretation which includes near 70,000 contradictions (impossible to be true) is what a snake-oil salesman would sell you. 🐍 [Materialism/Empiricism version of Science]: The standard model of physics is 3+1 space-time, which are considered locally real, where 0 is considered not locally real. Been that way since Newton. Problem is...quantum physics proved the observable universe (1D, 2D, 3D and 4D) is actually not locally real...and that was over a year ago! 🦧 [Layman's terminology of locally real vs not locally real]: locally real = more real (Leibniz said "necessary") not locally real = less real (Leibniz said "contingent") TL;DR if you aren't sure if the meaning of 0 (zero) and 1 (nonzero) changing is epic just remember that Rick Sanchez ,🥒, collapsed a Galactic Federation by changing a 1 into a 0.
@NotNecessarily-ip4vc
@NotNecessarily-ip4vc 4 месяца назад
in·fin·i·ty MATHEMATICS a number greater than any assignable quantity or countable number (symbol ∞). What is the meaning of zero in Webster's dictionary? a. : the arithmetical symbol 0 or 0̸ denoting the absence of all magnitude or quantity. b. : additive identity. specifically : the number between the set of all negative numbers and the set of all positive numbers. Zero is the most important number in mathematics and is both a real and an imaginary number with a horizon through it. Zero-dimensional space is the greatest dimension in physics and is both a real and an imaginary dimension with an event horizon through it. Isn't God supposed to be outside of space (1D, 2D, 3D) and time (4D)? Well, 0D is outside of space and time: 0D (not-natural) = dimensionless and timeless 1D-3D (natural) = spatial dimensions 4D (natural) = temporal dimension Quarks are dimensionless (no size) and timeless (not-natural). The two main quark spin configs two-down, one-up (subatomic to neutron) and two-up, one-down (subatomic to proton) could easily be construed as the male (neutron) and female (proton) image that Elohim made us in during Genesis 1. Quarks experience all 3 fundamental forces plus have a fractional electric charge that's why protons and neutrons have electrons orbiting around them. A) The postulated soul has 1. no spatial extension, 2. zero size and 3. exact location only. B) Quarks are mass with no size measured in Megaelectron Volts. Conclusion: A and B are the same thing.
@NotNecessarily-ip4vc
@NotNecessarily-ip4vc 4 месяца назад
Important point 👉 (dont forget): 0D (zero) is different from 1D-10D (nonzero) because 0D is a not-natural dimension whereas 1D-10D are natural dimensions. 0D monad (Creator event horizon) 1D, 2D, 3D are spatial (space) dimensions 1D line 2D width 3D height 4D, 5D, 6D are temporal (time) dimensions 4D length 5D breadth 6D depth 7D, 8D, 9D are spectral (energy) dimensions 7D continuous 8D emission 9D absorption 10D black hole (Destroyer event horizon) It is impossible for 1D-9D to have an event horizon since only 0D has an event horizon. 10D at least contains a placeholder 0 for its event horizon. The other side of the event horizon at the zero-of yourself (near horizon) is God. The other side of the event horizon of a black hole (far horizon) is not God. It's a mirror universe with 0D at the center. This side (Elohim; singularity) is contingent and less real (the natural dimensions anyway) and the other side (El; alone) is necessary and more real (pretty sure the entirety of the other side remains locally real and simply "knowing Good" but yeah sue me if im wrong 💵). The zero-of ourselves (more real 👻) was made by the Holy Trinity in Genesis 1 which should not be confused with the Unholy Trinity in Genesis 2 who constantly messes with the 1D, 2D, 3D parts of us (less real 🤷‍♂️). Read Leibniz's Monadology 📖 and consider that the Monad is the zero-dimensional space binding our quarks together with the strong force (it is). The other side of the Monad is Monos (Alone) and this side is Monas (Singularity) and there's an event horizon between them. So El/Elohim or Theos/Logos etc pick your language.
@user-fc4hm8oh4b
@user-fc4hm8oh4b 4 месяца назад
@@NotNecessarily-ip4vc The answer to “the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything" was 42 You'll need to try harder
@jasonbash
@jasonbash 4 месяца назад
John 5:37 And the Father himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. Ye have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his shape.
@Kyroblox
@Kyroblox 4 месяца назад
I would not usually reply to your video as you have asked this question over and over. I find this very strange how many of the Trinity people spend so much time trying to prove this concept. I do not see many JW's spending so much time asking the same old question about the oneness of Jehovah. Maybe they are far more secure about what they teach, that they have moved on with the real message of our preaching work ! So as you are not really getting it, here it is again. Hopefully this time the penny will drop, so please pay attention ! So let's look at the teaching of the Trinity which is that all three are: Co-equal, co-eternal and co-omniscient. So the first point: Co-equal, Jesus said "the father is greater than I am" so a true Christian being a follower of Jesus, the son of God will listen and accept what he says. Anyone who contradicts what Jesus himself said is not following Jesus. So, now it is YOUR turn, please can you show us where Jesus said that all three are EQUAL ? Can you show us where any of the Bible writers stated that all three are equal ? Can you show us from the Bible where it says that the holy spirit is God and is equal to God ? Please give your witness . As for the Holy spirit being a person you have it so wrong, Gen 1 tells us that it was God's "holy spirit" that was moving over the surface of the earth, and it is NOT a person. The Bible writers told us about the holy spirit and how "It" would teach us, have you ever heard of a person being called an "It" ? You do not refer to a person as an "It" If you were to go back to the time of Abraham, and talk to him, do you honestly think that after reading Gen 1 he would have concluded thatGod was made up of that time of two persons, one being Yehovah and the other being the holy spirit? Abraham did not say "listen oh Israel, you God Yehovah is two Gods in one, now did he ! That is why the Jews laugh at you Trinity people because they know the Hebrew language and they know that the holy spirit is not a person. In the Bible, the word “spirit” is translated from the Hebrew word ruʹach and the Greek word pneuʹma. Most often, those words refer to God’s active force, or holy spirit. By referring to God’s spirit as his “hands,” “fingers,” or “breath,” the Bible shows that the holy spirit is not a person. And according to Vines Bible Dictionary, These meanings all share the sense of something invisible to humans that produces visible effects. Similarly, the spirit of God, “like the wind, is invisible, immaterial and powerful.”-An Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words, by W. E. Vine Misconception: Jesus’ apostles and other early disciples believed that the holy spirit was a person. Fact: The Bible does not say that, nor does history. The Encyclopædia Britannica states: “The definition that the Holy Spirit was a distinct divine Person . . . came at the Council of Constantinople in ad 381.” This was over 250 years after the last of the apostles had died. When YOU stand before God, and like the apostle Stephen, you see Jesus sitting at God's right hand and see NO Holy spirit sitting there, then you will then realise that you have been duped by God's enemy. Why wait until then ! The Trinity really is like knocking square pegs into round holes. Don't let pride of being wrong stop you from being corrected by the almighty Yehovah, the one who is the God and father of our Lord Jesus Eph 1:3
@ericolmos7816
@ericolmos7816 4 месяца назад
Beautiful!! You are correct and clearly educated on the subject! My hat is off to you sir!! Well done!!!
@user-fc4hm8oh4b
@user-fc4hm8oh4b 4 месяца назад
Hi, May I correct somewhat your point. I've very rarely heard anything about the Trinity in a Church. What I learnt about the Trinity was in discussions with JWs when they confronted me on the issue. **Seriously.** Perhaps "Trinity people spend so much time trying to prove this concept" because it is attacked so much? Certainly, that was my experience with JWs and their literature. Hence my own interest in the "Trinity" If I was Satan and wanting to mislead people, I would attack the Gospel, God's way of Salvation. Get people to try to earn their salvation, something they can not ever do. Next, to reaffirm their need to do it on their own, I'd seek to show that Jesus and His sacrifice are not big enough to pay for the sins of everyone - just those of Adam. A man-for-a-man sacrifice. Then its up to you, somehow. That is also what the JWs preach, the "real message" you referred to. As I understand it, the original Gospel does not apply to the "Great Crowd", just to a select few. Best Regards, Eric
@jessekings7828
@jessekings7828 4 месяца назад
You make sense, no doubt. The Bible is tricky however. What about the couple that died instantly because they lied to the holy spirit? Why then does the Bible quote in the name of the Father , Son and Holy Spirit? The Devil is also called the spirit? Although a different one, not holy, when he led Christ into the desert to tempt him? I just came to the conclusion that there are many things we can't understand, and I'm good with that. When in doubt, I just remember what Christ told the devil: it is written, only the Father must you worship...
@davidrennie4033
@davidrennie4033 4 месяца назад
How can you grieve an active force,lie, to it.The holy spirit had the ability to speak, so therefore the holy spirit is God.
@davidrennie4033
@davidrennie4033 4 месяца назад
When, Jesus said the father was greater than me,he was talking about position.
@richb.48
@richb.48 4 месяца назад
I see all the JW trolls just spouted off all their normal crap. Do any of you have anything you want to address IN THE VIDEO? Didn't think so.
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
WHO IS OVER ALL? Ephesians 4:6 one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all. GOD and FATHER is OVER/ABOVE ALL and that "All" includes the SON so they are NOT EQUAL THE BIBLE teaches that Jesus was MADE As Lord and Christ and as Son (ACTS 2:36, Prov 8, HEB 1:5), CREATED/PRODUCED/INSTALLED (Prov 8) , COME INTO BEING/MADE (Mat 21:42 - egeneto) and GIVEN LIFE by the Father - John 5:26 and it uses TODAY (Heb 1:5), and uses future tenses and is a prophecy in Isa 9:6 (Isa 9:6, - WILL BE) . If you are called MADE AND CREATED AND GIVEN LIFE, and NEVER CALLED in the BIBLE as Creator or Maker , then you are A CREATION. ALL FROM THE BIBLE From the Lord was this (this is referring to the chief cornerstone who is Jesus) , the word WAS is egeneto (made or came into being) - Matthew 21:42 and the exact Greek word used in John 1:3 - MADE, egeneto (came into being) - JESUS WAS MADE/CAME INTO BEING FROM THE FATHER , yes, Jesus was MADE/CREATED!, See also Acts 2:36, Heb 1:5, 1 john 5 Isa 9:6 the word Prince in the Prince of Peace means PATRON ANGEL also Leader. WHO IS the ONE LEADER that we have? Jesus. Now, that same exact Hebrew word was used for Daniel 12:1 which is used for Michael the Archangel. So are you saying there are MANY LEADERS now?
@jimjuri6490
@jimjuri6490 4 месяца назад
(Acts 20:29, 30) I know that after my going away oppressive wolves will enter in among you and will not treat the flock with tenderness, 30 and from among you yourselves men will rise and speak twisted things to draw away the disciples after themselves. After the Apostles, those sporting the 'Christian' label would teach twisted things. The Trinity certainly falls into that bracket. That is why people are still trying to wrap their heads around what it is. No one believes the RCC version any more it seems. Each come out with his own theory.
@johngreene8332
@johngreene8332 Месяц назад
@@Mr.DC3.1914 I have a few questions for you: 1. Isaiah 44:24: (NWT): This is what Jehovah says, your Repurchaser, who formed you since you were in the womb: "I am Jehovah, who made everything. I stretched out the heavens by myself. And I spread out the earth. Who was with me? My question is who created everything by themselves? 2: John 1:3: (NWT): All things came into existence through him, and apart from him not even one thing came into existence. According to verse, who created everything? 3. How can Isaiah say that Jehovah created everything by Himself and John say that the Word (Jesus) created everything? Are one of these verses wrong or is Jehovah Jesus? 4. Isaiah 9:6 refers to the Son as the Mighty God and the Everlasting Father so how can you call Him an angel also? (Note there are many meanings (at least 10) to the word prince including Ruler--context dictates the proper interpretation.)
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 Месяц назад
@@johngreene8332 Context is KEY. Isa 44 shows that GOD is ONE person as He used I AM and ME, and it is Him who MADE EVERYTHING as CREATOR OR MAKER. Isa 44:2. No other Maker or Creator and as GOD can claim to do that. So there is no other TWO PERSONS who are called CREATOR OR MAKER. John 1:3 uses the Greek word DIA which means A CHANNEL OF AN ACT, so GOD used Jesus as a Channel in the act of creation. Isa 9:6 is in FUTURE TENSE(will be) AND A PROPHECY so those titles did not apply yet to Jesus until later when the prophecy was fulfilled. Also the word SAR in Hebrew means PATRON ANGEL.
@johngreene8332
@johngreene8332 Месяц назад
@@Mr.DC3.1914 I respectively disagree with some your comments as Jehovah said He created everything by Himself-He had no help. Here is the verse in question from the New World Translation: Isaiah 44:24: This is what Jehovah says, your Repurchaser, who formed you since you were in the womb: “I am Jehovah, who made everything. I stretched out the heavens by myself, and I spread out the earth. Who was with me?” This verse states that Jehovah made everything BY HIMSELF. He asks the rhetorical question-who was with me? Answer no one. In other words, the actual creation of the universe was accomplished by Jehovah alone. Compare what Isaiah said to what the apostle John said: John 1:3: All things came into existence through him, and apart from him not even one thing came into existence. This verse makes a couple of important points: 1. Jesus created everything. God the Father did direct Him to do this but He was the creative force that did it. 2. Because Jesus created everything, He is not a created being-He could not create Himself! Since He is not a created being, He has to be God. 3. No angel or creature can create something out of nothing. This is something only God can do. The only conclusion I can make from this that Jesus is Jehovah. Moreover, these are not the only passages that show that Jesus is Jehovah. Isaiah said that Jehovah is the First and the Last: Isaiah 44:6: “Thus says the Lord, King of Israel, and his Redeemer, the Lord of hosts; I am the First and the Last; besides Me there is no God. (NKJV) Note that the word translated from the Hebrew as “Lord” is the tetragrammaton which can also be translated as “Jehovah” as the King James does. In Revelation John writes: Revelation 1:17-18: “Do not be afraid, I am the First and the Last. I am He who lives, and was dead, and behold, I am alive forevermore. Amen. And I have the keys of Hades and of Death. Who was it the lived, died, and is alive forevermore-Jesus. Note that He is taking the same designation that Jehovah said about Himself. Therefore, Jesus is Jehovah, which makes Him God. Regarding Isaiah 9:6, “Sar” is the transliteration of the Hebrew word that is translated as “prince”. While “sar” can mean “patron saint” it more often means “prince”. “Sar” is translated in the KVJ as prince (208 times), captain (130 times), chief (33 times), ruler (33 times), governor (6 times), keeper (3 times), principal (2 times), general (once), lords (once), and miscellaneous (4 times). (Word count is from Blueletterbible.org). Here is an example where “sar” is translated as “prince’: Numbers 22:14 (NKJV): And the princes of Moab rose and went to Balak, and said, “Balaam refuses to come with us.” Obviously, inserting “patron angels” for “princes” would not make any sense as these are men not angels in this passage. As I previously said, context dictates the definition that is used. In Isaiah 9:6 the context is that a Son is born, and His name is given as among other names, “the mighty God” thereby stating that this Son is God. Since God is not an angel it would be incorrect to say, “patron angel of peace”. Moreover, even the New World Translation uses “prince of peace”. Also, this verse is, as you said, a prophecy about the millennial kingdom (‘the government will be on His shoulders”) which Jesus will rule over. As Jesus will be the King of this kingdom, “patron angel” just doesn’t fit but “prince” does.
@caspertx27
@caspertx27 4 месяца назад
where's the verse?
@neildavidson3957
@neildavidson3957 4 месяца назад
Don't just take anybody's opinion, read the whole scripture(old & new) diligently and pray for wisdom. Do it regularly, over time you will begin to see the truth-it will set you free from the prevailing deception.
@kennynoNope
@kennynoNope 4 месяца назад
Title should be wrong about 99% of their teachings.
@xxxViceroyxxx
@xxxViceroyxxx 4 месяца назад
except the trinity, interestingly...
@kennynoNope
@kennynoNope 4 месяца назад
@@xxxViceroyxxx if the trinity is false what doctrine do you believe is true?
@xxxViceroyxxx
@xxxViceroyxxx 4 месяца назад
@@kennynoNope Jesus being created, not being consubstantial
@kennynoNope
@kennynoNope 4 месяца назад
@@xxxViceroyxxx oh okay. Can I ask where do you get that idea from?
@xxxViceroyxxx
@xxxViceroyxxx 4 месяца назад
i guess john 17:3 is a good one to repudiate consubstantiality. i don't have a prooftext for other hot takes like "created, not eternal" and "no prehuman existence" @@kennynoNope
@MW-dr1yi
@MW-dr1yi 4 месяца назад
From their own butchered translation, the Holy Spirit is God and isn't a force. John 4-24 God is a Spirit, and those worshipping him must worship with spirit and truth.” Matthew 3-16 After being baptized, Jesus immediately came up from the water; and look! the heavens were opened up, and he saw God’s spirit descending like a dove and coming upon him. Luke 3-22 and the holy spirit in bodily form like a dove came down upon him, and a voice came out of heaven: “You are my Son, the beloved; I have approved you.” Luke confirms the The Spirit of God is the Holy Spirit Acts 5-3 But Peter said: “An·a·niʹas, why has Satan emboldened you to lie to the holy spirit and secretly hold back some of the price of the field? 4 As long as it remained with you, did it not remain yours? And after it was sold, was it not in your control? Why have you thought up such a deed as this in your heart? You have lied, not to men, but to God.”
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 4 месяца назад
All trinity people and watchtowers we see God is keeping His promise. Proverbs 30:6
@leejohnson6328
@leejohnson6328 4 месяца назад
I have looked over and over again and never once have I seen any evidence of a trinity in the Scriptures
@northernarray4320
@northernarray4320 4 месяца назад
Great clip from a debate with Anthony Rodgers ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-yswRmVyodKU.html
@RowanTasmanian
@RowanTasmanian 4 месяца назад
How many Gods do you believe in ? is Jesus a God according to you and Jehovah another God ? Please answer as no JW appears to be honest enough to say "I believe both Jehovah and Jesus are 2 Seperate Gods and therefore I believe in 2 Gods making myself a Polytheist" Is that your belief and doctrine ??
@leejohnson6328
@leejohnson6328 4 месяца назад
@@RowanTasmanian exodus 7:1 John 10:34 Are you one who obeys the very God that Jesus worships? Do you yes even you believe in the God of Jesus? Revelation 3:12 Matthew 22:41-46
@RowanTasmanian
@RowanTasmanian 4 месяца назад
@@leejohnson6328 Lee, these were simple questions. Come out of the Polytheistic closet and answer the questions 1)How many Gods do you believe in ? 2)is Jesus a God according to you and Jehovah another God ? Please answer as no JW appears to be honest enough to say "I believe both Jehovah and Jesus are 2 Seperate Gods and therefore I believe in 2 Gods making myself a Polytheist" Is that your belief and doctrine ?? Come on Lee, 2 questions to answer. 1)How many Gods do you believe in ? 2)is Jesus a God according to you and Jehovah another God ?
@RowanTasmanian
@RowanTasmanian 4 месяца назад
@@leejohnson6328 Lee, where's your answer to these two questions ????
@sam_tate
@sam_tate 4 месяца назад
They do the same for calling the cross pagan. It's very annoying because they know that these sources probably won't be checked.
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 4 месяца назад
The trinity is not in the bible thus a violation of proverbs 30:5-6
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 4 месяца назад
Jesus showed by his words that stauros was not the cross
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 4 месяца назад
​@@bretherenlee1404It is in the Bible.
@WakeingUp
@WakeingUp 4 месяца назад
@@bretherenlee1404 😂Where is Governing Body in the Bible? Where is it that birthdays are condemned? etc etc
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 4 месяца назад
@@misterauctor7353 where?
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 4 месяца назад
190 AD Clement Of Alexandria [note: Clement NEVER calls Jesus a creature.] "There was then, a Word importing an unbeginning eternity; as also the Word itself, that is, the Son of God, who being, by equality of substance, one with the Father, is eternal and uncreated." (Fragments, Part I, section III) "that so great a work was accomplished in so brief a space by the Lord, who, though despised as to appearance, was in reality adored, the expiator of sin, the Saviour, the clement, the Divine Word, He that is truly most manifest Deity, He that is made equal to the Lord of the universe; because He was His Son, and the Word was in God, not disbelieved in by all when He was first preached, nor altogether unknown when, assuming the character of man, and fashioning Himself in flesh, He enacted the drama of human salvation: for He was a true champion and a fellow-champion with [ie. God among creatures, not that Jesus is classed as a creature] the creature." (Exhortations, Chap 10) 190 AD Clement Of Alexandria "I understand nothing else than the Holy Trinity to be meant; for the third is the Holy Spirit, and the Son is the second, by whom all things were made according to the will of the Father." (Stromata, Book V, ch. 14) 190 AD Clement Of Alexandria "When [John] says: 'What was from the beginning [1 John 1:1],' he touches upon the generation without beginning of the Son, who is co-equal with the Father. 'Was,' therefore, is indicative of an eternity without a beginning, just as the Word Himself, that is the Son, being one with the Father in regard to equality of substance, is eternal and uncreated. That the word always existed is signified by the saying: 'In the beginning was the Word' [John 1:1]." (fragment in Eusebius History, Bk 6 Ch 14; Jurgens, p. 188) 190 AD Clement Of Alexandria 'For both are one - that is, God. For He has said, "In the beginning the Word was in God, and the Word was God." (The Instructor, Book 1, ch 8) 190 AD Clement of Alexandria "Despised as to appearance but in reality adored, [Jesus is] the Expiator, the Savior, the Soother, the Divine Word, he that is quite evidently true God, he that is put on a level with the Lord of the universe because he was his Son." (Exhortation to the Greeks, 10:110:1). 190 AD Clement of Alexandria "The Word, then, the Christ, is the cause both of our ancient beginning, for lie was in God, and of our well-being. And now this same Word has appeared as man. He alone is both God and man, and the source of all our good things" (Exhortation to the Greeks 1:7:1). 190 AD Clement Of Alexandria "Now, O you, my children, our Instructor is like His Father God, whose son He is, sinless, blameless, and with a soul devoid of passion; God in the form of man, stainless, the minister of His Father's will, the Word who is God, who is in the Father, who is at the Father's right hand, and with the form of God is God." (Instructor, Book I, ch. 2) 190 AD Clement Of Alexandria "His Son Jesus, the Word of God, is our Instructor.... He is God and Creator." (Instructor, Book I, ch. 11) 190 AD Clement Of Alexandria "This is the New Song, the manifestation of the Word that was in the beginning, and before the beginning. The Savior, who existed before, has in recent days appeared. He, who is in Him that truly is, has appeared; for the Word, who "was with God," and by whom all things were created, has appeared as our Teacher. The Word, who in the beginning bestowed on us life as Creator when He formed us, taught us to live well when He appeared as our Teacher; that as God He might afterwards conduct us to the life which never ends." (Exhortation To The Heathen, ch 2) 190 AD Clement Of Alexandria "This Word, then, the Christ, the cause of both our being at first (for He was in God) and of our well-being, this very Word has now appeared as man, He alone being both, both God and man" (Exhortation To The Heathen, ch 2) 190 AD Clement Of Alexandria "For it was not without divine care that so great a work was accomplished in so brief a space by the Lord, who, though despised as to appearance, was in reality adored, the expiator of sin, the Savior, the clement, the Divine Word, He that is truly most manifest Deity, He that is made [made = appointed not created, ie. made king after resurrection.] equal to the Lord of the universe; because He was His Son, and the Word was in God, not disbelieved in by all when He was first preached, nor altogether unknown when, assuming the character of man, and fashioning Himself in flesh" (Exhortation To The Heathen, ch 10) 190 AD Clement Of Alexandria "Now, O you, my children, our Instructor is like His Father God, whose son He is, sinless, blameless, and with a soul devoid of passion; God in the form of man, stainless, the minister of His Father's will, the Word who is God, who is in the Father, who is at the Father's right hand, and with the form of God is God." (The Instructor, Book 1, ch 2)
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
Babylonia "The ancient Babylonians recognised the doctrine of a trinity, or three persons in one god-as appears from a composite god with three heads forming part of their mythology, and the use of the equilateral triangle, also, as an emblem of such trinity in unity" (Thomas Dennis Rock, The Mystical Woman and the Cities of the Nations, 1867, pp. 22-23).
@evanwindom3265
@evanwindom3265 4 месяца назад
@@Mr.DC3.1914 Yeah, so? The Babylonians believing in a trinity doesn't make it the origin of anyone else's. Chefs call the combination of onion, celery and green pepper "the trinity". I suppose next you'll be telling us that the origin of the Trinity doctrine is a cable TV cooking channel?
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
@@evanwindom3265Wonder why the pagans such as in Babylonia used the term THREE PERSONS IN ONE GOD, BUT NEVER FOUND IN THE BIBLE?
@STROND
@STROND 4 месяца назад
You say equality. Well, Jesus never taught that, in fact the simple truth is this, Jesus said "the father is greater than I AM" So, how about the HS, can you show us where in the Bible it says, "the holy spirit is equal to God and to Jesus" ? Just one will do !
@evanwindom3265
@evanwindom3265 4 месяца назад
@@Mr.DC3.1914 Why ask me? I don't know any Babylonian pagans. But maybe they can tell you where "governing body" and "overlapping generation" are in the Bible. Let me know what they say, 'kay?
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 4 месяца назад
12:13 And, they have taught it.
@MrPoohman1981
@MrPoohman1981 4 месяца назад
This is an interesting topic. What is the trinity exactly? The Christ died, God can’t die. That would mean the world was without God for three days and that’s absolutely impossible.
@renatovasquez6041
@renatovasquez6041 4 месяца назад
They are obviously out of fisherofmens net, which says, The God of our forefathers raised up Jesus and exalted him as chiefprince,!@Acts, 5:28-31,so,not Jesus who raised his body in three days, he reveals these to his apostles privately, @Matthew, 13:10-11 /Mark, 4:34, /Deut, 32:39 /1st, Sam, 2:6-7 /2nd, Kings, 5:7,
@STROND
@STROND 4 месяца назад
Jehovah's Witnesses are not wrong about the Trinity. The Bible does not teach that God is made up of three Gods in one. Can you show us where Jesus said that God is made up of three Gods in one ? Can you show us where any of the disciples said that God is made up of three Gods in one ? And as the foundation doctrine of the Trinity is that all three are co-equal, can you show us where Jesus said that all three are EQUAL ? Can you show us where any of the Bible writers stated that all three are equal ! When Bible translations such as the KJ Bible have to resort to adding whole sentences to the Bible in order to try and back uo the Trinity, then alarm bells should rung for all lovers of TRUTH!
@LightoverDarkMinistry
@LightoverDarkMinistry 4 месяца назад
Can you show me where Jesus said he was Michael the Arc Angel?
@STROND
@STROND 4 месяца назад
​@@LightoverDarkMinistry That is a bit weird, I ask you to answer, what should be simple questions, and what you do is to try and deflect the heat, by deflecting the question and asking another question. Sorry my friend I am to long in the tooth to play that game, so answer the question I left you with then I will answer yours, simple !
@LightoverDarkMinistry
@LightoverDarkMinistry 4 месяца назад
@@STROND Translation: “He called out my inconsistent logic, and since I can’t address it for fear of exposing my inconsistency, I’ll just claim he’s not answering questions, call it weird, then try and make him respond to a dozen scriptures where I’ll just deflect, and turn it into a never ending back and and forth, all so I can avoid what was asked.”
@STROND
@STROND 4 месяца назад
​​@@LightoverDarkMinistrySo it boils down to not only trying to deflect the question, but simply repeating the statement I made. Oh well, as you can't answer the simple question, it just goes to show that you should not really waste yours, and other peoples time by asking the question in the first place. At least the casual observer has seen how you have exposed yourself and your very weak argument for the non Biblical Trinity 😂
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 4 месяца назад
JWs are wrong about the trinity.
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 4 месяца назад
the trinity is defeated for none shall be able to defend it for it is not in any of the holy words. all who promote the trinity will be defeated none shall stand
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 4 месяца назад
English?
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 4 месяца назад
@@misterauctor7353 is this a yes to the God that Jesus worships?
@user-fc4hm8oh4b
@user-fc4hm8oh4b 4 месяца назад
@@bretherenlee1404 Hi Bretheren I see that you are still posting the same cryptic questions I believe that we are to Worship both God the Father and His Son Rev 22:1 "Then the angel showed me a river with the water of life, clear as crystal, flowing from the *throne (singilar) of God and of the Lamb*. ... 3 No longer will there be a curse upon anything. For the *throne (singilar) of God and of the Lamb* will be there, and his (singilar) servants will worship him (singilar) . 4 And they will see his face (singilar) , and *his name (singilar)* will be written on their foreheads." They will finally share one throne and one name. What name could that be? Jehovah? I trust that you will be there and will be prepared to worship God and the Lamb, the crucified Jesus (= Jehovah Saviour, Matthew 1:21) Best Regards, Eric
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 4 месяца назад
@@user-fc4hm8oh4b are you saying yes to the God Jesus worships?
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 4 месяца назад
@@user-fc4hm8oh4b 1 Corinthians 15:24-28
@ronhansen8471
@ronhansen8471 13 часов назад
Who is wrong about all the triune gods of pagan religions since Nimrod? Rome had multiple triune gods. Rome was the power that created the Roman Catholic church that created Christendom and no doubt included one of their many triune gods.
@renatovasquez6041
@renatovasquez6041 3 месяца назад
Exodus 9:16 /Romans, 9:17, Jehovah hardened Paraoh's hearth so that He can use His Power to force him to free the Israelites, but dispites of Jehovah's power which lead them out from Egypt, they grieved the Power of Jehovah which is His Holy Spirit, @Isaiah, 63:10,
@WakeingUp
@WakeingUp 4 месяца назад
Ellipsis in WT quotes - 99% of the time taken out of context. But when indoctrinated you just ass-u-me "faithfull slave" is being honest
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 4 месяца назад
Trust issues 100.
@stevenwebb6253
@stevenwebb6253 4 месяца назад
Sorry, Jesus isn’t God, nor equal to God. He called our God and Father his God and Father at John 20:17. See also: 1 Corinthians 8:4-6 4 Now concerning the eating of food offered to idols, we know that an idol is nothing in the world and that there is no God but one. 5 For even though there are so-called gods, whether in heaven or on earth, just as there are many “gods” and many “lords,” 6 there is actually to us one God, the Father, from whom all things are and we for him; and there is one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things are and we through him. And…… John 17:3 “This means everlasting life, their coming to know you, the only true God, and the one whom you sent, Jesus Christ.” The only true God…..
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 4 месяца назад
Sorry, Jesus is God. Watch the video.
@LightoverDarkMinistry
@LightoverDarkMinistry 4 месяца назад
Go watch Part 1, I address Scripture there. Link in the description.
@RowanTasmanian
@RowanTasmanian 4 месяца назад
St Thomas and St John (along with all the Disciples) needs to be taught by you as they were of the understanding Jesus was God. John 20:28-29 (LSB Strong's) 28 Thomas answered and said to Him, “My Lord and my God!” 29 Jesus *said to him, “Because you have seen Me, have you believed? Blessed are those who did not see, and yet believed.” Oopsie, that verse = Check Mate for your opinion..
@stevenwebb6253
@stevenwebb6253 4 месяца назад
@@RowanTasmanian John 20:28,29 Great scriptures. They are open to interpretation of course. Did Thomas call Jesus God? Or, did he bring attention or thanks to his lord Jesus and his Father(God)? Did Thomas look at Jesus when he said ‘my Lord’, then raise his eyes and maybe his hand to the sky when he said ‘my God’? No one knows. We weren’t there. Inconclusive.
@EscapetoFaith
@EscapetoFaith 4 месяца назад
@@stevenwebb6253 You're working reaaaaaaaally hard to invalidate the scriptures so that they agree with Watchtower leaders. If you have to work that hard to disprove the word of God, then it isn't God you're following..
@nonconformist4802
@nonconformist4802 4 месяца назад
It is easier for a rock to speak than for a JW to accept the deity of Christ.
@jimjuri6490
@jimjuri6490 4 месяца назад
Both being impossible I guess. JWs, many, once did believe in the Jesus being God theory. They had to blindly, being part of a church which believed it. What made them change? John 8:31,32.
@nonconformist4802
@nonconformist4802 4 месяца назад
@@jimjuri6490 "And he answered and said unto them, I tell you that, if these should hold their peace, the stones would immediately cry out." Luke 19 If God say its possible, I suppose we can believe that. But yes, it is practically impossible. _"JWs, many, once did believe in the Jesus being God theory."_ I have never came across any documentation that even remotely suggest that it was the case at any time. _"They had to blindly, being part of a church which believed it."_ They following this cult on their own steam and ignorance, nobody forced them into that. And that is the sad part. Have a nice day
@jimjuri6490
@jimjuri6490 4 месяца назад
@@nonconformist4802 : Many JWs came out of the churches. Logically they would have ONCE believed in the Trinity while being MEMBERS of churches.
@nonconformist4802
@nonconformist4802 4 месяца назад
@@jimjuri6490 Sorry, I am not arguing, but I don't understand something here. How could they have once believe in the trinity if their jesus IS NOT a God? When did this "ONCE" taken place, is that after they left their cult or ... I don't understand what you try to tell me?
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
WHO IS OVER ALL? Ephesians 4:6 one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all. GOD and FATHER is OVER/ABOVE ALL and that "All" includes the SON so they are NOT EQUAL THE BIBLE teaches that Jesus was MADE As Lord and Christ and as Son (ACTS 2:36, Prov 8, HEB 1:5), CREATED/PRODUCED/INSTALLED (Prov 8) , COME INTO BEING/MADE (Mat 21:42 - egeneto) and GIVEN LIFE by the Father - John 5:26 and it uses TODAY (Heb 1:5), and uses future tenses and is a prophecy in Isa 9:6 (Isa 9:6, - WILL BE) . If you are called MADE AND CREATED AND GIVEN LIFE, and NEVER CALLED in the BIBLE as Creator or Maker , then you are A CREATION. ALL FROM THE BIBLE From the Lord was this (this is referring to the chief cornerstone who is Jesus) , the word WAS is egeneto (made or came into being) - Matthew 21:42 and the exact Greek word used in John 1:3 - MADE, egeneto (came into being) - JESUS WAS MADE/CAME INTO BEING FROM THE FATHER , yes, Jesus was MADE/CREATED!, See also Acts 2:36, Heb 1:5, 1 john 5 Isa 9:6 the word Prince in the Prince of Peace means PATRON ANGEL also Leader. WHO IS the ONE LEADER that we have? Jesus. Now, that same exact Hebrew word was used for Daniel 12:1 which is used for Michael the Archangel. So are you saying there are MANY LEADERS now?
@mo2874
@mo2874 4 месяца назад
The strongest support for Jehovah's Witnesses view on God not being a trinity historically *is the bible itself* ... Nothing archaeologically, literaturally, linguistically etc can trump the bible. Moses recorded God's own words on this.... Genesis 1:1,26,27 New Living Translation *1In the beginning* God created the heavens and the earth. *26Then God said, “Let US make human beingsb in our image, to be like US.* They will reign over the fish in the sea, the birds in the sky, the livestock, all the wild animals on the earth,c and the small animals that scurry along the ground.” *27So God created human beingsd in his own image. In the image of God he created them;* male and female he created them. So at creation's start (before the earth was created) God was with someone...and that being was in God's image. *There were 2 individuals....* Which other being does the bible say is in Gods image before mankind was created...? Colossians 1:15 New Living Translation *15Christ is the visible image of the invisible God. He existed before anything was created* and is supreme over all creation,e Hebrews 1:2 New Living Translation 2And now in these final days, he has spoken to us through his Son. God promised everything to the Son as an inheritance, *and through the Son he created the universe.* 1 Corinthians 8:6 New Living Translation 6But for us, There is *one God, the Father,* by whom all things were created, and for whom we live. *And there is one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom all things were created,* and through whom we live. How many God's are there? ONE...the Father/Creator. How many Lord's are there? ONE, Jesus being God's primary means of creating mankind... 2 separate beings at creation again... John 1:1-3 brings that out too, *2 separate beings at earth creations start...* New Living Translation Prologue: Christ, the Eternal Word *1In the beginning the Word already existed. The Word was with God,* and the Word was God. *2He existed in the beginning with God. 3God created everything through him, and nothing was created except through him.* So far we've gone back to the creation of the earth and seen that God is ONE person...and his Son/Jesus/the word is ONE person... John 17:5 New Living Translation 5Now, *Father, bring me into the glory we shared before the world began.* The historical references after that that Jehovah's Witnesses point to prove that non Israelite/Jewish nations worshipped more that one God. *Some of them actually worshipped triads/triunes/trinities of God's....* *In ancient Egypt there were many triads:* the Osirian (or Abydos) triad of Osiris (husband), Isis (wife), and Horus (son),[8] the Theban triad of Amun, Mut and Khonsu the Memphite triad of Ptah, Sekhmet and Nefertem the Elephantine triad of Khnum (god of the source of the Nile river), Satet (the personification of the floods of the Nile river), and Anuket (the Goddess of the nile river). the sungod Ra, whose form in the morning was Khepri, at noon Re-Horakhty and in the evening Atum, and many others.[9] en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triad_(religion) The Israelites after coming out of Egypt were clearly told their God Jehovah was unique....he was above all gods - He is No.1... Deuteronomy 6:4 American Standard Version Hear, O Israel: *Jehovah our God is one Jehovah:* That carried throughout Israelite/Jewish history... Zechariah 14:9 American Standard Version And Jehovah shall be King over all the earth: *in that day shall Jehovah be one, and his name one.* Mark 12:29 American Standard Version Jesus answered, The first is, Hear, O Israel; *The Lord our God, the Lord is one:* Aramaic Bible in Plain English Yeshua said to him, “The first of all the commandments: *'Hear Israel, THE LORD JEHOVAH your God, THE LORD JEHOVAH, he is One.' “*
@STROND
@STROND 4 месяца назад
Such a good reply. Well stated.
@LightoverDarkMinistry
@LightoverDarkMinistry 4 месяца назад
Just one question. Did you watch any of the content?
@mo2874
@mo2874 4 месяца назад
@@LightoverDarkMinistry Of course...I just addressed your argument from a different angle...from before the Mosaic law. It clearly shows God and Jesus as two individual beings. The bible is powerful...
@jesuschristsaves9067
@jesuschristsaves9067 4 месяца назад
@@mo2874 *You:* _The strongest support for Jehovah's Witnesses view on God not being a trinity historically is the bible itself…_ This has got to be the dumbest statement of history made by any Jehovah’s witnesses. To say the Bible is the best historical evidence for any Christian belief is question begging that your interpretation is the correct one. The Bible itself wouldn’t exist had it not have the *stamp and seal of canonicity by TRINITARIAN MEN.* *You:* _Nothing archaeologically, literaturally, linguistically etc can trump the bible._ Second dumbest statement. The Bible doesn’t interpret itself. Men do. You either interpret it correctly or incorrectly by you guys and your fake-God believing organization. I’m going to go with the interpretation that can be consistently traced back for 2,000 years, by the men who canonized the scriptures, by the earliest Christian community. Not some cultic sect that appears 19 centuries later.
@LightoverDarkMinistry
@LightoverDarkMinistry 4 месяца назад
@@mo2874 Yeah I agree, The Bible is powerful. It’s God Breathed and sufficient in bringing someone to salvation. You keep saying two beings, but in the OT, the Malak of YHWH is called YHWH directly, and so either YHWH is multi-personal, or there are multiple YHWH’s, and that can’t work since there is only one God.
@jimjuri6490
@jimjuri6490 4 месяца назад
If the Roman Church came up with the Trinity concept which was borrowed from pagan sources, and the Protestants found it necessary to break free from that Church, logically, the RCC teachings should be false. Today, as is obvious, people don't believe the RCC concept of the Trinity. All these debates are about making Jesus into God. The Holy Spirit takes a back seat.
@LightoverDarkMinistry
@LightoverDarkMinistry 4 месяца назад
It’s amazing how in 4 sentences, nothing you said was true. Can you respond to the content and instead of just posting….whatever this is you posted.
@jimjuri6490
@jimjuri6490 4 месяца назад
@@LightoverDarkMinistry : If the Trinity was a concept of the Roman Catholic church and the breakaway Protestants borrowed it when they broke away, how can what I wrote not be regarding this topic. Jehovah God has raised his Witnesses as shown as Isaiah 43:10 to preach that he is the ONLY God. No one can be added to him. Jesus and the holy spirit was added by the apostate church. I'd like to be shown one clear scripture that even hints that Jesus or the holy spirit IS God. Jesus clearly refers to himself as a MAN. He definitely NOT being God. (John 8:40) But now you are seeking to kill me, A MAN who has told you the truth that I HEARD FROM GOD. If I hear something from my wife, I logically cannot be my wife, can I. JWs teach the truth as did Jesus.
@LightoverDarkMinistry
@LightoverDarkMinistry 4 месяца назад
@@jimjuri6490 You gonna respond to the video? How about the parts where the WT was attempting to deceive their readers. Any comment on that?
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 4 месяца назад
200 AD Tertullian "Never did any angel descend for the purpose of being crucified, of tasting death, and of rising again from the dead." (The Flesh of Christ, ch 6) 200 AD Tertullian "All the Scriptures give clear proof of the Trinity, and it is from these that our principle is deduced...the distinction of the Trinity is quite clearly displayed." (Against Praxeas, ch 11) 200 AD Tertullian "The origins of both his substances display him as man and as God: from the one, born, and from the other, not born" (The Flesh of Christ, 5:6-7). 200 AD Tertullian "[God speaks in the plural 'Let us make man in our image'] because already there was attached to Him his Son, a second person, his own Word, and a third, the Spirit in the Word....one substance in three coherent persons. He was at once the Father, the Son, and the Spirit." (Against Praxeas, ch 12) 200 AD Tertullian "Thus the connection of the Father in the Son, and of the Son in the Paraclete, produces three coherent Persons, who are yet distinct One from Another. These Three are, one essence, not one Person, as it is said, 'I and my Father are One' [John 10:30], in respect of unity of Being not singularity of number" (Against Praxeas, 25) 200 AD Tertullian "As if in this way also one were not All, in that All are of One, by unity (that is) of substance; while the mystery of the dispensation is still guarded, which distributes the Unity into a Trinity, placing in their order the three Persons - the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost: three, however, not in condition, but in degree; not in substance, but in form; not in power, but in aspect; yet of one substance, and of one condition, and of one power, inasmuch as He is one God, from whom these degrees and forms and aspects are reckoned, under the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost." (Against Praxeas, by Tertullian) 200 AD Tertullian "So too, that which has come forth out of God is at once God and the Son of God; and the two are one.... In his birth he is God and man united." (Apology, ch 21) 200 AD Tertullian "There is one only God, but under the following dispensation, or oikonomia, as it is called, that this one only God has also a Son, His Word, who proceeded from Himself, by whom all things were made, and without whom nothing was made. Him we believe to have been sent by the Father into the Virgin, and to have been born of her - being both Man and God, the Son of Man and the Son of God, and to have been called by the name of Jesus Christ; we believe Him to have suffered, died, and been buried, according to the Scriptures, and, after He had been raised again by the Father and taken back to heaven, to be sitting at the right hand of the Father, and that He will come to judge the quick and the dead; who sent also from heaven from the Father, according to His own promise, the Holy Ghost, the Paraclete, the sanctifier of the faith of those who believe in the Father, and in the Son, and in the Holy Ghost. That this rule of faith has come down to us from the beginning of the gospel, even before any of the older heretics." (Against Praxeas, ch 2) 200 AD Tertullian "That there are two Gods and two Lords, however, is a statement which we will never allow to issue from our mouth; not as if the Father and the Son were not God, nor the Spirit God, and each of them God; but formerly two were spoken of as Gods and two as Lords, so that when Christ would come, he might both be acknowledged as God and be called Lord, because he is the Son of him who is both God and Lord" (Against Praxeas 13:6) 200 AD Tertullian "The Spirit is God, and the Word is God, because proceeding from God, but yet is not actually the very same as He from whom He proceeds.." (Against Praxeas, ch 26) 200 AD Tertullian "For He could not have been the Father previous to the Son, nor a judge previous to sin" (Against Hermogones, Ch 3) 200 AD Tertullian "He will be God, and the Word - the Son of God. We see plainly the twofold state, which is not confounded, but conjoined in One Person - Jesus, God and Man.." (Against Praxeas, ch 27) 200 AD Tertullian "God alone is without sin. The only man who is without sin is Christ; for Christ is also God" (The Soul 41:3)
@jimjuri6490
@jimjuri6490 4 месяца назад
@@LightoverDarkMinistry : JWs have been raised to declare 'that I am the same One. Before me no God was formed, And after me there has been none.' - Isaiah 43:10 All this video does is quote post Apostolic sources to come up with 'evidence' for a trinity. Paul had clearly stated that after the death of the Apostles, (Acts 20:30) and from AMONG YOU YOURSELVES men will rise and SPEAK TWISTED THINGS to draw away the disciples after themselves. Close associates of Paul could have been among these who came up with Twisted Teachings. The Trinity certainly falls into this category because people are still trying to wrap their heads around it. Each coming out with his own theory. Here is some good advice Paul gave. 1 Corinthians 4:6....that through us you may learn the rule: “Do not go beyond the things that are written,”
@mattgardiner614
@mattgardiner614 4 месяца назад
Uh-Oh! I thought the Trinity was supposed to be one of the "fundamentals" of Christianity. As opposed to one of your "Non-Essentials". But what do we have here, in the comments section for Pt's 1 and 2? A whole bunch of 'Christian' commenters who specifically state they are not JW's saying it's nonsense. Where's the unity? Don't you find all this a bit embarrassing?
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 4 месяца назад
???
@LightoverDarkMinistry
@LightoverDarkMinistry 4 месяца назад
No. They are modalists, which is one of the earliest heresies, or Unitarians who are not Christians as they believe in a different God and different Jesus. Matt, I will say, more JW’s have commented on this post than any other content I’ve made, and not one has addressed the arguments I’ve made, no tried to address the lies the WT posted. Do you believe the WatchTower was wrong in misleading their readers in misrepresenting material?
@mattgardiner614
@mattgardiner614 4 месяца назад
@@LightoverDarkMinistry I'm hoping on your behalf that the ones I was referring to don't see your comment. You might get some heated comments directed at you. 😂 I've slowly come to the realization that there is little point getting into the details of scripture and doctrine here. It's the same debates, the same points of contention, over-and-over again, whatever the video itself may be about. So you'd have probably noticed that my comments have become less frequent and certainly less detailed over the past few months. What I have found myself instinctively doing, is kind of rising above, and looking down on the two opposing versions of Christianity from a birds eye view and seeing how they measure up to what I think the Bible is saying, on three key aspects in particular: 1) The constant struggle of living as a Christian and the impossibility of enduring without the support of Jehovah and your co-believers, 2) The importance of, and the obligation to preach, and 3) The possibility of moving in-and-out of a 'Saved' state. One - Can you guess which one? - fails the sniff test on all three. So why bother hashing out other stuff? (This is NOT me saying that understanding the nature of God is not important. Of course it is) By the time a non-JW starts frequenting comment sections like this, it's highly unlikely that the can be persuaded out of their errors, and I can't think of a solitary instance where anyone has had their opinions changed on here in either direction. So it's a bit of a waste of time for Witnesses, in my opinion, to stick around for too long.
@mattgardiner614
@mattgardiner614 4 месяца назад
@@LightoverDarkMinistry One other thing, kind of related to my original comment. I've been poking you a bit the last few months over your use of the term "Non-essentials". JW's have them too. Just completely different from yours. For a Witness they come in two categories: 1) Things we may wonder about, but the Bible itself doesn't really say anything about. For example, will we be able to eat meat in the new system, will there still be poisonous plants, what new requirements might be in the "New Scrolls". Stuff like that. Things that might make for interesting conversations, but don't really matter because we'll find out later. And 2) Things that (To a point) are left to our discretion or our conscience (Hence why these ones are also referred to as 'Conscience' issues). Like, should I consume alcohol or not? What level of violence is acceptable to watch on TV or in movies, etc. If the Bible is clear as to whether something is true or false, good or bad, then it's NOT a "Non-essential" to be believed or not believed, adhered to or not adhered to, according to OUR personal preferences. This is why I had such a problem with you putting doctrines in essential/non-essential categories and why I used terms like "Spiritual Smorgasbord" to describe your (In my opinion, bogus) version of Christianity.
@Flashheartwoof
@Flashheartwoof 4 месяца назад
No he didn’t.
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
Babylonia "The ancient Babylonians recognised the doctrine of a trinity, or three persons in one god-as appears from a composite god with three heads forming part of their mythology, and the use of the equilateral triangle, also, as an emblem of such trinity in unity" (Thomas Dennis Rock, The Mystical Woman and the Cities of the Nations, 1867, pp. 22-23).
@evanwindom3265
@evanwindom3265 4 месяца назад
Yeah, so? The Babylonians believing in a trinity doesn't make it the origin of anyone else's. Chefs call the combination of onion, celery and green pepper "the trinity". I suppose next you'll be telling us that the origin of the Trinity doctrine is a cable TV cooking channel?
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
@@evanwindom3265 Wonder why the pagans such as in Babylonia used the term THREE PERSONS IN ONE GOD, BUT NEVER FOUND IN THE BIBLE?
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
@@evanwindom3265 DEUT 6:4 JEHOVAH IS ONE JEHOVAH. You won't call SOMETHING TRINITY if that is ONE PERSON, SINGULAR PROSOPO, ONE JEHOVAH, THUS THE BIBLE never used the term Trinity, TRIUNE God, three persons in One God but those terms are found in pagans
@STROND
@STROND 4 месяца назад
@@evanwindom3265 Well, if it is not from the Bible, then it is of pagan origin.
@evanwindom3265
@evanwindom3265 4 месяца назад
@@STROND You mean like "governing body" and "overlapping generation"?
@renatovasquez6041
@renatovasquez6041 4 месяца назад
Jesus, when he become in his nature as a chiefangel he sent his angel to John, saying " do not worship me, i am your fellow servant like your brethrens the prophets, worship God, these passage proves Jesus was ressurrected by Jehovah and made him archangel to rule the angels, Acts, 5:28-31,
@jimjuri6490
@jimjuri6490 4 месяца назад
That is correct. Only that Jesus had already been the Archangel whom God sent. John 17:4  I have glorified you on the earth, having FINISHED THE WORK YOU HAVE GIVEN ME TO DO. 5 So now, Father, glorify me at your side WITH THE GLORY THAT I HAD alongside you before the world was. Jesus was begging God to RESTORE his position with its glory. That of the Archangel.
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 3 месяца назад
​@@jimjuri6490But, Jesus wasn't an archangel. There is no evidence.
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 3 месяца назад
Have you read Acts 5 in context?
@jimjuri6490
@jimjuri6490 3 месяца назад
@@misterauctor7353 :(1 Thessalonians 4:16) because the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a commanding call, WITH AN ARCHANGEL'S VOICE and with God’s trumpet, and those who are dead in union with Christ will rise first. If Jesus is not Michael the Archangel how will Jesus come using Michael's voice? Why would he?
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 3 месяца назад
@@jimjuri6490 "Why would he?" With a voice? That means nothing.
@Flashheartwoof
@Flashheartwoof 4 месяца назад
Why make it even debatable? Why didn’t Jesus just say “for the avoidance of doubt, I am Yahweh@?
@kardiognostesministries8150
@kardiognostesministries8150 4 месяца назад
Proverbs 25:2
@EscapetoFaith
@EscapetoFaith 4 месяца назад
He did, just not in the linear wording that deniers request. Even if there literally were the words "For avoidance of doubt, I am Yahweh" the WT org would just do what it does all of the other times.... create some weird interpretation that claims why his words mean something else, or just change the scripture.
@mattmurdock2868
@mattmurdock2868 4 месяца назад
He did, many times. Our God has MANY names/titles...learn some of them.
@Flashheartwoof
@Flashheartwoof 4 месяца назад
@@mattmurdock2868 no he didn’t
@Flashheartwoof
@Flashheartwoof 4 месяца назад
@@kardiognostesministries8150a good example of something that isn’t Jesus saying he’s God. Thanks.
@jimjuri6490
@jimjuri6490 4 месяца назад
According to Paul, Jesus was only used by God as a spokesperson in the last days of the Jewish system. Namely the 1st Century. Hebrews 1:2. Jesus being COMPARED to other MEANS God had used earlier (verse 1). Then again, what would Paul know. The apostate church which came up with the foretold 'perverse (KJV) or twisted teachings would know better, it seems. Acts 20:30. Why did the Protestants break away IF the Roman Church was the one true Church teaching TRUTH? Makes it a 'You cannot have the cake and eat it' scenario. Using words of people who came AFTER the apostles to justify some Trinity is violating the simple direction. 1 Corinthians 4:6....that through us you may learn the rule: “Do not go beyond the things that are written,”
@LightoverDarkMinistry
@LightoverDarkMinistry 4 месяца назад
Does the “not go beyond things written” include the “new scrolls” Stephen Lett talked about. Or having a governing body of 9 men, or the term inbaptized publisher. I can keep going.
@jimjuri6490
@jimjuri6490 4 месяца назад
@@LightoverDarkMinistry "Rev 20:12...and scrolls were opened. But another scroll was opened; it is the scroll of life. This is opened during the 1,000 year rule of Jesus. Until such time stick to what is written as advised by Paul.
@LightoverDarkMinistry
@LightoverDarkMinistry 4 месяца назад
@@jimjuri6490 Yeah that’s true accounts of people’s lives by which they judged by, please read the context and not listen to men from New York.
@jimjuri6490
@jimjuri6490 4 месяца назад
@@LightoverDarkMinistry : Psalms 130:3 If errors were what you watch, O Jah, Then who, O Jehovah, could stand? 4 For with you there is true forgiveness, So that you may be held in awe. No record of peoples' lives will be kept. All will be given a new start during the 1,000 year reign of Jesus. Compare Acts 24:15.
@LightoverDarkMinistry
@LightoverDarkMinistry 4 месяца назад
@jimjuri6490 Romans 2:5-6 ( Written in 57AD, to the Church in Rome. How are they storing up wrath on the day of judgement for sins they are currently engaged in?) But because of your stubbornness and unrepentant heart you are storing up wrath for yourself on the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God. Hebrews 9:27 ( You die once, and are judged after, by Christ 2 Cor 5:10) just as people are destined to die once, and after that to face judgment. Please email me so we can set up a time to talk about this. If you think I'm wrong and spreading lies, I'm more than happy to give you a public platform.
@kardiognostesministries8150
@kardiognostesministries8150 4 месяца назад
9:08 I heard the vote was like 318 to 2.
@LightoverDarkMinistry
@LightoverDarkMinistry 4 месяца назад
Yeah pretty much lol. I had way more to say but it was running like 25-30 minutes.
@kardiognostesministries8150
@kardiognostesministries8150 4 месяца назад
@@LightoverDarkMinistryUnderstood. There is so much to cover. Great job!
@jimjuri6490
@jimjuri6490 3 месяца назад
Hebrews 1:5 For example, TO WHICH OF THE ANGELS did God ever say: “You are my son; today I have become your father”? And again: “I will become his father, and he will become my son”? 6 But when HE AGAIN BRINGS HIS FIRSTBORN into the inhabited earth, he says: “And let all of God’s angels do obeisance to him.” Jesus is God's FIRSTBORN created ANGEL.
@LightoverDarkMinistry
@LightoverDarkMinistry 3 месяца назад
Can you explain verses 10-12 compared to Psalm 102?
@jimjuri6490
@jimjuri6490 3 месяца назад
@@LightoverDarkMinistry : How can some other verse change the fact that Jesus was chosen from among the angels, he being the FIRSTBORN? Is someone trying to show that the Bible contradicts itself? Apples can be compared to apples. (Hebrews 1:4) So he has become better than the angels to the extent that he has inherited a name more excellent than theirs. Who has become better than the Angels? An Angel or Almighty God??
@LightoverDarkMinistry
@LightoverDarkMinistry 3 месяца назад
Jesus who took the form of a servant, and now is seated at the right hand of God, being fully man and fully God. Go read Phil 2:5-11@@jimjuri6490
@jimjuri6490
@jimjuri6490 3 месяца назад
@@LightoverDarkMinistry : I read Philippians 2. Especially verses 9-11. God exalts Jesus to a superior position. Who is this God who PROMOTED Jesus in rank? IF Jesus was already Almighty God, does it mean that after his promotion, Jesus is now GREATER than ALMIGHTY? If Jesus is seated at the right hand of God how could he be God who logically would be on Jesus' left side? Please help out with the questions asked. If possible.
@LightoverDarkMinistry
@LightoverDarkMinistry 3 месяца назад
Sure, it's answered in that very passage, that's why you shouldn't just read verses 9-11. Jesus being in the form of God didn't use that to his advantage instead humbled himself, took the form of a servant and was obedient up until death, and since he did that God exalted him. The divine word, became flesh. ( John 1-14) That flesh was of creation, and now ressurrected in glorified body, ( Phil 3:20) he sits at the right hand of the Father, still fully God and fully man, ( Col 2:9 ) the perfect mediator and high priest. ( 1 Tim 2:5) This is what is revealed in scripture. But you deny the incarnation, you deny the bodily resurrection of Christ, you even deny he's mediator for all men. I love you and hope you see the truth of scripture Jim@@jimjuri6490
@jimjuri6490
@jimjuri6490 4 месяца назад
Acts 2:22 is a testimony of Peter that Jesus was A MAN whom God worked THROUGH. People through whom God works do not become God. JWs understanding of the Bible matches the first Century Christians.
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 4 месяца назад
No, it doesn't.
@jesuschristsaves9067
@jesuschristsaves9067 4 месяца назад
😂😂😂😂😂😂. So what happened in the second century to the 19th century?
@jimjuri6490
@jimjuri6490 4 месяца назад
@@jesuschristsaves9067 : Satan was running the show. How could God RESTORE TRUE WORSHIP in the last days (Micah 4:105) if some church was already practicing it? Think about the Spanish Inquisition. The 100 year war and other conflicts like the Crusaders. Can these be compared to Jesus and Christianity?
@jesuschristsaves9067
@jesuschristsaves9067 4 месяца назад
@@jimjuri6490 this is a pathetic answer and demonstrates a fundamental flaw in the watchtower’s interpretation of Proverbs 4:13 and Jesus’s claim in Matthew 16 where the gates of Hades shall not prevail over his “congregation”. So where did the switch in authority happen from Jehovah to Satan? *_When, according to history, did this overtaking of Satan happen?_*
@jimjuri6490
@jimjuri6490 4 месяца назад
@@jesuschristsaves9067 : I believe I answered this but my reply has been deleted. For death not to PREVAIL means that Jesus' Congregation has to first die. If it didn't die, why isn't everyone a member of the RCC? Why did the Protestants break away from the RCC? Was that the death of the 'True Church'?
@ericolmos7816
@ericolmos7816 4 месяца назад
Sooo Jesus is the mediator between God and Men and is the one who he is mediating the relationship with?? Sorry no Trinity in the Bible sir
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 4 месяца назад
Doesn't disprove the trinity.
@ericolmos7816
@ericolmos7816 4 месяца назад
@misterauctor7353 lol ok what does it do? It does disprove the trinity you just have to think about it instead of being indoctrinated into a belief system
@STROND
@STROND 4 месяца назад
​​@@misterauctor7353So then of it is the Bible please show us WHERE . PLEASE show us where God is made up of three Gods in one. Can you show us where Jesus said that God is made up of three Gods in one ? Can you show us where any of the disciples said that God is made up of three Gods in one ? And as the foundation doctrine of the Trinity is that all three are co-equal, can you show us where Jesus said that all three are EQUAL ? Can you show us where any of the Bible writers stated that all three are equal !
@LightoverDarkMinistry
@LightoverDarkMinistry 4 месяца назад
In answer to your questions, Yes. Jesus is the perfect mediator between God and Man since he himself is God and Man. Your statement comes trying to bring God down to human level. He is unlimited by his nature and beyond our understanding. Just because you don’t understand it, doesn’t make it not true.
@ericolmos7816
@ericolmos7816 4 месяца назад
@LightoverDarkMinistry do you think the point of the verse was to show Jesus is God and man?? If so please look again as to why the verse states that. I am not trying to downgrade Jesus but you are trying to elevate him to more than he is which is wrong. Jesus has a rightful place the mediator, chosen one, son, etc. He is not YHWH since he doesn't know the day or hour, and since he subject's himself to God 1 cor. 15:27,28. Do not go beyond what is written to prove your indoctrination.
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 4 месяца назад
You cannot say my God and be Almighty God, it is impossible.
@kardiognostesministries8150
@kardiognostesministries8150 4 месяца назад
It is possible in that Stephen properly referred to Jesus as "my God" in John 20:28.
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 4 месяца назад
@@kardiognostesministries8150 where in there did Thomas say Jesus is my God?
@kardiognostesministries8150
@kardiognostesministries8150 4 месяца назад
@@bretherenlee1404Thomas said unto Him (in reference to Jesus)...
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 4 месяца назад
@@kardiognostesministries8150 yes he said out of excitement where did he say Jesus is my God?
@kardiognostesministries8150
@kardiognostesministries8150 4 месяца назад
@@bretherenlee1404Prove he said it out of excitement. Specify the Greek word that teaches what you are affirming.
@moseslivingstone1258
@moseslivingstone1258 4 месяца назад
You all seem to miss the point. Jesus came to teach us how we can be one with God as he is one with God, how we can enter that special friendship and relationship he has with his Father. Therefore, worshipping Jesus in place of his Father or getting side tracked with doctrines such as the trinity teaches us nothing about the relationship Jesus has with his Father, or how we can emulate him.
@LightoverDarkMinistry
@LightoverDarkMinistry 4 месяца назад
No Christian worships Jesus in place of the Father, the two are worshiped as one.
@moseslivingstone1258
@moseslivingstone1258 4 месяца назад
@@LightoverDarkMinistry So the two are interchangeable. Can you worship Jesus one day and then the next day worship the Father because even though they are different people they are still, as you claim, the same God? If Jesus worships the Father, Jehovah, and he taught us to worship God as he does, then to turn around and worship Jesus, instead of The Father, isn't that idolatry?
@mattmurdock2868
@mattmurdock2868 4 месяца назад
​@moseslivingstone1258 "For the Father judges no one, but has committed all judgement to the Son, that all should honor the Son just as they honor the Father. He who does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent Him." Jn.5:22
@bygeorgehemayberite8385
@bygeorgehemayberite8385 4 месяца назад
@moseslivingstone Is that kinda like when JW Broadcasting said giving of ur valuable things allows you to be God’s Friend? Can you show us a scripture that says becoming God’s friend? I know that’s another new indoctrination piece used by the GB as they continue to repeat things w/o scripture. You do realize why they say The Great Crowd of Other Sheep (hint: the phrase is no where in the Bible, BTW) can become God’s friend by your works, correct? It’s b/c u are taught u don’t belong in the New Covenant and Jesus is not YOUR mediator, but only the mediator to the 144,000 (or is it now 162,000 w/ all the new partakers coming out of nowhere?) Anywho, although this is no where in scripture, it’s been hammered in ur head that Jesus ministry was for the world to have an opportunity to be Jehovah’s friend, not children, but friend, & he opened up a gateway for 144,000 selected JW’s to go to heaven. However, the only way u can be Jehovah’s friend all depends on ur obedience to “Christ’s Brothers”, The Governing Body (& yes, this in print in various WTs, & printed publications). But hey, if u can show us a passage where Jesus or his Apostles said anything about us becoming Jehovah’s friend, that would great.
@STROND
@STROND 4 месяца назад
​@@LightoverDarkMinistry sorry but you do, you state that Jesus is equal to HIS GOD YEHOVAH even though Jesus clearly said "the father is GREATER than I AM " I do not think you will ever listen to us so listen to what Jesus said when he said with HIS OWN mouth "the father is GREATER than I AM " Jesus own words alone disprove the foundation teaching of the Trinity that being all three are "co-equal "
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 4 месяца назад
Once Jesus said 'My God '(revelation 3:12), that ended all debate in regards who he is and is not
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 4 месяца назад
Out of context?
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 4 месяца назад
@@misterauctor7353 how so?
@LightoverDarkMinistry
@LightoverDarkMinistry 4 месяца назад
Jesus is still a glorified man in heaven. The gloried human nature of Christ, has a God.
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 4 месяца назад
@@LightoverDarkMinistry we know Jesus no longer by the flesh as the bible shows us at 2 Corinthians 5:15-17 He is no longer a man he is as he was before he came to earth in the form of God that form is a spirit body. In that spirit body he said Revelation 3:12. this shows he has a God once he says that there is no more discussion for God has no God. Matthew 22:41-46
@user-fc4hm8oh4b
@user-fc4hm8oh4b 4 месяца назад
@@bretherenlee1404 Dear Bretheren, I note that you appear to believe, as do JWs, that Jesus was resurrected as a purely Spiritual body. Jesus’ physical body did not rise. Sadly, by still following Watchtower, you are in effect making our Lord into a liar and a conman In response to the Jews who challenged Him “What sign can you show us to prove your authority to do all this?”, Christ replied “Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.” John 2:19 Verse 21 shows that He was talking about the temple of His body in which He, the Word, tabernacled among us (John 1:14). This is a clear claim by Jesus that His physical body would be resurrected. If He did not raise His body as claimed, then He was a Liar. When Christ appeared to his Disciples, after his Resurrection; and they were terrified *supposing* they had seen a Spirit (Luke 24: 37). They were wrong. Jesus, to correct their error, said to them "“Look at my hands and my feet. It is I myself! Touch me and see; a ghost (spirit) does not have flesh and bones, as you see I have.” And when He had said this, He showed them His hands and His feet " (Luke 24:38-40). Jesus explicitly pointed out that His resurrected body was not merely an immaterial spirit. He stresses to them “it is I myself”. He is the same Jesus that they knew.. He stresses that His resurrected body is made of flesh and bones, it is not a Spirit just made to look like it is flesh and bones. He then offers His hands and feet for them to examine. He tells them to see and touch the scars on His resurrected crucified body To further reassure them, He said to them, ‘Have you anything here to eat?’ They gave Him a piece of broiled fish, and He took it and ate before them” (Luke 24:41-43). *****So, is Jesus a total conman, misleading His disciples?***** When Jesus ascended to His Father, He is seen in heaven with a human body; the “Son of Man” who amazed Daniel (7:13) “there before me was one like a son of man, coming with the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient of Days and was led into his presence.” When the Son of Man returns to Earth, they will see Him whom they have *pierced* and they will realise their error and mourn (Rev 1. 7-8). Note: in Zechariah 12:10 it is *JEHOVAH* that they pierced and will look upon In the book of Revelation, Jesus is pictured as “a Lamb, looking as if it had been slain” (Rev 5:6), i.e. He still has the marks on His body of His crucifixion. Finally, we see Him as the Lamb sitting on God’s throne being worshipped Rev 22 :3-5 “The throne of God and of the Lamb will be in the city, and his servants will serve him. They will see his face, and his name will be on their foreheads”. Regards, Eric
@soundthealarm83
@soundthealarm83 4 месяца назад
JW: "The word "trinity" is not in the bible so therefore its not true Also a JW: "Well no the term "governing body" isnt in the Bible but that doesnt mean..."
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
If GOD is three persons and all are named JEHOVAH, and if you see them in front of you, count one by one, how MANY JEHOVAH do you see? that is THREE JEHOVAH, and Deut 6:4 says JEHOVAH IS ONE JEHOVAH. and THAT IS NOT THREE JEHOVAH
@Doeyhead
@Doeyhead 4 месяца назад
Having done so much of my own research, I realized that if the JW's didn't have it right, nobody did. After continuing my research, i found that the JW's didn't have it right and therefore nobody does. So now I'm an atheist but the idea that the GWs are wrong on the Trinity is probably the most incorrect aspect. If you want to call them an apocalyptic Cult, that's a fair criticism, but it does seem like the growing academic consensus is that the earliest Christians were not trinitarians.
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 4 месяца назад
200 AD Tertullian "Never did any angel descend for the purpose of being crucified, of tasting death, and of rising again from the dead." (The Flesh of Christ, ch 6) 200 AD Tertullian "All the Scriptures give clear proof of the Trinity, and it is from these that our principle is deduced...the distinction of the Trinity is quite clearly displayed." (Against Praxeas, ch 11) 200 AD Tertullian "The origins of both his substances display him as man and as God: from the one, born, and from the other, not born" (The Flesh of Christ, 5:6-7). 200 AD Tertullian "[God speaks in the plural 'Let us make man in our image'] because already there was attached to Him his Son, a second person, his own Word, and a third, the Spirit in the Word....one substance in three coherent persons. He was at once the Father, the Son, and the Spirit." (Against Praxeas, ch 12) 200 AD Tertullian "Thus the connection of the Father in the Son, and of the Son in the Paraclete, produces three coherent Persons, who are yet distinct One from Another. These Three are, one essence, not one Person, as it is said, 'I and my Father are One' [John 10:30], in respect of unity of Being not singularity of number" (Against Praxeas, 25) 200 AD Tertullian "As if in this way also one were not All, in that All are of One, by unity (that is) of substance; while the mystery of the dispensation is still guarded, which distributes the Unity into a Trinity, placing in their order the three Persons - the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost: three, however, not in condition, but in degree; not in substance, but in form; not in power, but in aspect; yet of one substance, and of one condition, and of one power, inasmuch as He is one God, from whom these degrees and forms and aspects are reckoned, under the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost." (Against Praxeas, by Tertullian)
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
FROM TERTULLIAN - square brackets mine. - But if this same Wisdom is the Word of God, in the capacity of Wisdom, and (as being He) without whom nothing was made, just as also (nothing) was set in order without Wisdom, how can it be that anything, except the Father, should be OLDER, and on this account indeed NOBLER, than the Son of God, the only-begotten and first-begotten Word? Not to say that what is unbegotten is STRONGER than that which is BORN ([this is Jesus]) , and what is not made more powerful than that which is MADE ([ JESUS]) . Because that which did not require a Maker to give it existence, will be much more ELEVATED in rank than that which had an AUTHOR TO BRING IT INTO BEING ([JESUS])
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 4 месяца назад
the trinity is catholic and the catholic church is one of the largest cults on the planet. They fulfilled acts 20:28-30. No one has the permission by God to call Him a Trinity. God never used the term trinity nor did Jesus and it was not therefore inspired by the holy wind. All who promote the trinity are under the curse of God. Galatians 1:8-9
@jimjuri6490
@jimjuri6490 4 месяца назад
Paul (and Jesus) prophesied that after the death of the Apostles Satan would run things among so-called Christians. (Acts 20:30) and from AMONG YOU yourselves men will rise and SPEAK TWISTED THINGS to draw away the disciples after themselves. Any twisted teaching cannot be comprehended. The Trinity which the apostate church came up with falls into this category. That is why it is still being debated today. No such debates ever took place within the first Century Christian Congregation. Because: (1 Corinthians 8:6) there is actually TO US ONE GOD, THE FATHER, For TRUE CHRISTIANS only the Father in the Heavens is God. No one else. JWs have been raised by God in these last days to declare: (Isaiah 43:10) “You are MY WITNESSES,” declares Jehovah, “Yes, my servant whom I have chosen, So that you may know and have faith in me And understand that I AM THE SAME ONE. Before me no God was formed, And after me there has been none. The addition of Jesus and the Holy spirit as God/s was an apostate development. Jehovah is the ONLY TRUE GOD according to Jesus (John 17:3) and JWs. Jesus along with his disciples worship Jehovah.
@mattmurdock2868
@mattmurdock2868 4 месяца назад
You're confused between Father and Son. The one who speaks by Isaiah is not the Father but the Son. Start from the beginning of the chapter and read the names and titles of the one speaking. Not the Father, the Son.
@STROND
@STROND 4 месяца назад
​@@mattmurdock2868Incorrect. It is Jehovah who is speaking right from verse one. That is what happens when you read a translation that removes God's name, YOU end up getting confused as to who is talking. Don't believe us then refer to the dead see scrolls which are online and you will see it is YHWH (Yehovah) right from verse one !
@mattmurdock2868
@mattmurdock2868 4 месяца назад
@@STROND Ok, Strond... From the beginning of the chapter Christ the LORD identify Himself using these names and titles: LORD. God. Holy One. Savior. He. Redeemer. King. These names/titles denote position, role, function and office held within the Kingdom and the Godhead. Christ is King, He is our "Redeemer," not "Repurchaser. This in ONE of the MANY names of our God that Watchtower has REMOVED and REPLACED with some nonsense about "Jehovah." Our Father is NOT the "Redeemer," He had no means of redemption and that was not His role to fill. It was through role of the Fatger to SEND Crist the Redeemer, and through Him, redeem all things TO Himself. Our Father SENT the Redeemer. Christ is Savior and He is the "Holy One." Our Father does not use these names/titles, nor does our Father hold these positions. Our Father does not fill these roles or perform these functions. The titles shared by Father and Son, "LORD" and "God." Learn the names and titles used by Father and Son, learn the difference between Father and Son. The one who speaks by Isaiah is Christ the LORD.
@jimjuri6490
@jimjuri6490 4 месяца назад
@@mattmurdock2868 : If Jesus spoke in Isaiah's time then Paul got it wrong, it would seem. Paul clearly tells us that God used Jesus as his spokesperson only in the last days of the Jewish system. Namely, 1st Century (Heb 1:2). The people who are confused are those who believe the twisted teachings set to arise with a Christian tag AFTER the death of the Apostles (Acts 20:29,30). The Trinity being one such. An apostate teaching which people are still trying to wrap their heads around. Thus, these debates.
@jimjuri6490
@jimjuri6490 4 месяца назад
@@STROND : True. Any Lord would be God, when it fancies Trinitarians. Ruth 2:13 To this she said: “Let me find favor in your eyes, my LORD, because you have comforted me and spoken reassuringly to your servant, although I am not even one of your servants.” Ruth speaking to Boaz.
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 4 месяца назад
The trinity must be defeated for it is a violation of the holy words. Proverbs 30:5-6
@caspertx27
@caspertx27 4 месяца назад
JW's Teaching about the Trinity is one of the few things they actually got right. There is not one verse in the Bible that says that "the Holy Spirit" is a God or equal to God. No where. Three Gods in one makes no sense.
@nightpixma
@nightpixma 4 месяца назад
The fact that you ended with “three Gods in one makes no sense” shows how completely uneducated you are on the topic. I encourage you to learn about topics so that you can accurately represent them before you start critiquing them.
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
@@nightpixma Babylonia "The ancient Babylonians recognised the doctrine of a trinity, or three persons in one god-as appears from a composite god with three heads forming part of their mythology, and the use of the equilateral triangle, also, as an emblem of such trinity in unity" (Thomas Dennis Rock, The Mystical Woman and the Cities of the Nations, 1867, pp. 22-23).
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
@@nightpixma If GOD is three persons and all are named JEHOVAH, and if you see them in front of you, count one by one, how MANY JEHOVAH do you see? that is THREE JEHOVAH, and Deut 6:4 says JEHOVAH IS ONE JEHOVAH. and THAT IS NOT THREE JEHOVAH
@user-fc4hm8oh4b
@user-fc4hm8oh4b 4 месяца назад
Hi Casper "There is not one verse in the Bible that says that "the Holy Spirit" is a God or equal to God. No where." He is Jehovah (Hebrews 10:15-17 quoting Jeremiah 31:33-34) He is the Lord (2 Corinthians 3:17-18) He is GOD (Acts 5:3-4) His temple is God’s temple (1 Corinthians 3:16-17; 6:19-20). We are to be baptized in the NAME (singular) of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit (Matthew 28:19). What name do these three persons share? Lord, Jehovah? Best Regards, Eric
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
@@user-fc4hm8oh4b If GOD is three persons and all are named JEHOVAH, and if you see them in front of you, count one by one, how MANY JEHOVAH do you see? that is THREE JEHOVAH, and Deut 6:4 says JEHOVAH IS ONE JEHOVAH. and THAT IS NOT THREE JEHOVAH
@dirkfirkle73
@dirkfirkle73 4 месяца назад
JW's believe the Trinity to be only what the Watchtower has taught them. And, as you say in the video, the Watchtower does not teach them the truth about the Trinity. The Watchtower presents a strawman Trinity and then attacks that. But that does not matter to these JW's. Because no matter how many times a Christian explains to them that they have an inaccurate belief of what the Trinity is, they cannot wrap their Watchtower controlled minds around it. They can only hear & believe what the Watchtower is telling them. And should the Watchtower ever change their stance against the Trinity, their obedient followers will change their stance right along with them as if nothing happened. Oh, there may be a very select few who would question the change, but Watchtower will just tell them it is "new light" and all will be good again.
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
If GOD is three persons and all are named JEHOVAH, and if you see them in front of you, count one by one, how MANY JEHOVAH do you see? that is THREE JEHOVAH, and Deut 6:4 says JEHOVAH IS ONE JEHOVAH. and THAT IS NOT THREE JEHOVAH
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
which PERSON OF GOD is talking here? If there are TWO more persons of GOD, then for you this person of GOD is lying. I am Jehovah, and there is no one else. There is no God except me. - ISA 45:5
@Mr.DC3.1914
@Mr.DC3.1914 4 месяца назад
Babylonia "The ancient Babylonians recognised the doctrine of a trinity, or three persons in one god-as appears from a composite god with three heads forming part of their mythology, and the use of the equilateral triangle, also, as an emblem of such trinity in unity" (Thomas Dennis Rock, The Mystical Woman and the Cities of the Nations, 1867, pp. 22-23).
@dirkfirkle73
@dirkfirkle73 4 месяца назад
@@Mr.DC3.1914 Your copy & paste just proves my point.
@dirkfirkle73
@dirkfirkle73 4 месяца назад
@@Mr.DC3.1914 Good news! Jehovah's new light says you don't have to count time anymore. You are no longer obligated to post this Watchtower Speak article that so many other Christians have debunked you on.
@MrZeuqsav
@MrZeuqsav 2 месяца назад
Nothing spirit left for trinitarians, its not a person, Holy spirit already given to the winners, they who believed that Jesus is the Son of God.@Acts.5:28-32/ 1st,John,5:5.🥰
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 2 месяца назад
???
@MrZeuqsav
@MrZeuqsav 2 месяца назад
Stop making Jesus a liar! Take note that Jesus never spoke parables to his apostles, @Mat.13:10-11/Mark.4:34. Therefore, John knews and wrote what Jesus command to Mary,@John.20:17. "Go and tell my brothers that I ascend to my Father and your Father, to my God and your God," who's lying? Take note also that Jesus whispered the truth to his apostles.read. Mat. 10:26-28.
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 2 месяца назад
You're calling Jesus the liar.
@MrZeuqsav
@MrZeuqsav 2 месяца назад
Not me, the trinitarians,​@@misterauctor7353
@MrZeuqsav
@MrZeuqsav 2 месяца назад
Not me , but trinitarian does, take note that Jesus never spoke parables to his apostles, so, when he said to them ,"my Father is greater than me," that's it. But when he said these to his critics, I and my Father are one, they are not literally one, he confused them with his sword, his figurative statements which divided the selfclaimed Christian denominations. @Mat.10:34-36/ compare Jesus prayer for his apostles @John, 17:1-22. ​@@misterauctor7353
@MrZeuqsav
@MrZeuqsav Месяц назад
The trinity idea made Jesus a liar, Romans, 10:9/ Acts,5:28-32, no christian trinitarian will be saved​@@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 5 дней назад
​@@MrZeuqsavProof? 200 AD Tertullian "He will be God, and the Word - the Son of God. We see plainly the twofold state, which is not confounded, but conjoined in One Person - Jesus, God and Man.." (Against Praxeas, ch 27) 200 AD Tertullian "God alone is without sin. The only man who is without sin is Christ; for Christ is also God" (The Soul 41:3)
@Uthink_
@Uthink_ 4 месяца назад
The trinity is false along with the name Jehovah. You have in scripture God the father and God the son and then the Holy Spirit person must be the uncle god who as Jesus said no one sees….including himself. See the problem?
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 4 месяца назад
The trinity is true. Chapter 2. The Catholic Doctrine of the Trinity and Unity, Sometimes Called the Divine Economy, or Dispensation of the Personal Relations of the Godhead
@ThePrairieChronicles
@ThePrairieChronicles 24 дня назад
Look up Nabeel Qureshi's explanation of the Trinity. It explains this very well. He begins by explaining how God is one Being in three Persons. Not unlike how you're a human being, and your person is "Uthink".
@ScottRock-mr6qk
@ScottRock-mr6qk 3 месяца назад
The trinity is pagan in origin. Jesus was the Angel of Jehovah not God. There's a reason Jesus is called the Word of God. And its not just because of wjat he did in the New Testament but what he also did in the Old Testament. And there's a reason he's called the Word of God too. It's because he speaks for God. You people should actually pick up your Bible amd read it and get the sense of what's being said in it.
@TonyExumJr
@TonyExumJr 2 месяца назад
That's exactly what was done here. Watch part 1
@ScottRock-mr6qk
@ScottRock-mr6qk 2 месяца назад
@TonyExumJr Nah because I'm not gonna entertain the ignorance of people that don't understand who and what Jesus is and was. It's not rocket science to see who he was and if I told you, you'd only reject what I say even though it's right out the Bible. I've already spent hours at a different place trying to open the eyes of those idiots and I refuse to waste another moment trying to help anyone else see the light. If you want to know who Jesus was before he came to earth as a man then I suggest you read Zechariah 12:8 and have a nice day.
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 2 месяца назад
Proof.
@misterauctor7353
@misterauctor7353 4 месяца назад
190 AD Clement Of Alexandria [note: Clement NEVER calls Jesus a creature.] "There was then, a Word importing an unbeginning eternity; as also the Word itself, that is, the Son of God, who being, by equality of substance, one with the Father, is eternal and uncreated." (Fragments, Part I, section III) "that so great a work was accomplished in so brief a space by the Lord, who, though despised as to appearance, was in reality adored, the expiator of sin, the Saviour, the clement, the Divine Word, He that is truly most manifest Deity, He that is made equal to the Lord of the universe; because He was His Son, and the Word was in God, not disbelieved in by all when He was first preached, nor altogether unknown when, assuming the character of man, and fashioning Himself in flesh, He enacted the drama of human salvation: for He was a true champion and a fellow-champion with [ie. God among creatures, not that Jesus is classed as a creature] the creature." (Exhortations, Chap 10) 190 AD Clement Of Alexandria "I understand nothing else than the Holy Trinity to be meant; for the third is the Holy Spirit, and the Son is the second, by whom all things were made according to the will of the Father." (Stromata, Book V, ch. 14) 190 AD Clement Of Alexandria "When [John] says: 'What was from the beginning [1 John 1:1],' he touches upon the generation without beginning of the Son, who is co-equal with the Father. 'Was,' therefore, is indicative of an eternity without a beginning, just as the Word Himself, that is the Son, being one with the Father in regard to equality of substance, is eternal and uncreated. That the word always existed is signified by the saying: 'In the beginning was the Word' [John 1:1]." (fragment in Eusebius History, Bk 6 Ch 14; Jurgens, p. 188) 190 AD Clement Of Alexandria 'For both are one - that is, God. For He has said, "In the beginning the Word was in God, and the Word was God." (The Instructor, Book 1, ch 8) 190 AD Clement of Alexandria "Despised as to appearance but in reality adored, [Jesus is] the Expiator, the Savior, the Soother, the Divine Word, he that is quite evidently true God, he that is put on a level with the Lord of the universe because he was his Son." (Exhortation to the Greeks, 10:110:1).
@DavidAgnew781
@DavidAgnew781 3 месяца назад
According to Clement of Alexandria: "the Word of God became man, that thou may learn from man how man may become God" (Exhortations 1). "he (man) has the form which is of the Word; he is made like to God...and that man becomes God." (The Instructor, 3.1). "we are a part of Him and of the same essence as God" ((Stromata 2.16). So do you believe that you become God and are of the same essence as God?
Далее
The Secret History of Jehovah's Witnesses
14:52
Просмотров 23 тыс.
He turned a baseball into a stylish shoe😱
00:59
Просмотров 867 тыс.
Crazy Girl destroy RC CARS 👩🤪🚘🚨
00:20
Просмотров 4,4 млн
Why Jehovah's Witnesses Misread The Bible
10:24
Просмотров 4,7 тыс.
7 Questions Jehovah's Witnesses Can't Answer
11:26
Просмотров 10 тыс.
Jehovah's Witness's Torture Stake Disproved
11:25
Просмотров 17 тыс.
Explaining Firstborn in Colossians 1:15
10:18
Просмотров 3,8 тыс.
Exposing The New World Translation: Part 2
13:21
Просмотров 4,8 тыс.
The Jehovah's Witness War doctrine disproved
13:50
Просмотров 3,7 тыс.
Jehovah's Witnesses 5 False Prophecies
13:47
Просмотров 4,5 тыс.
He turned a baseball into a stylish shoe😱
00:59
Просмотров 867 тыс.