Тёмный
No video :(

Why Religion is a Spiritual Placebo 

The Wonderful Truth
Подписаться 100 тыс.
Просмотров 15 тыс.
50% 1

In this video we uncover why science is the true path to enlightenment and spiritual fulfilment, not religious dogma.
If you would like to support this channel with a donation, you can do so here:
/ twt_pc
All contributions are greatly appreciated!
Follow us on Facebook & Twitter:
/ pl.curious
/ twtatheist
Sources:
1. Debate | Michael Shermer vs John Lennox Does God Exist
• Debate | Michael Sher...
2. Can Religion & Reason be Reconciled? | Reza Aslan & Sam Harris (Moderated by Jonathan Kirsch)
• Can Religion & Reason ...
3. Christopher Hitchens vs. Douglas Wilson Debate at Westminster
• Christopher Hitchens v...
4. Richard Dawkins on Science, the Poetry of Reality, Jewel in Humanity’s Crown
• Richard Dawkins on Sci...
Email:
TWTatheist@gmail.com

Опубликовано:

 

26 авг 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 467   
@Glennn7
@Glennn7 5 месяцев назад
“Religion Poisons Everything” - Christopher Hitchens
@irenehartlmayr8369
@irenehartlmayr8369 5 месяцев назад
Then he is a fool and does not know what religion is about.
@wow2819Al
@wow2819Al 5 месяцев назад
​@@irenehartlmayr8369 what religion is about then explain!?
@edivaldobarbosa3709
@edivaldobarbosa3709 5 месяцев назад
​@@irenehartlmayr8369oh,i would love to hear yout definition of religion
@irenehartlmayr8369
@irenehartlmayr8369 5 месяцев назад
@@wow2819Al So you are against something of which you don't have a clue...! Religion is about the spiritual aspects of humans.But then,materialists wouldn't even understand the word " spiritual ". Religion is also a code of ethical behaviour towards others.And this code is basically the same in all religions.
@irenehartlmayr8369
@irenehartlmayr8369 5 месяцев назад
@@edivaldobarbosa3709 Same answer to you. Neither of you have taken the trouble to look into the matter ! Obviously.So what are you talking about then ?
@adamwood46
@adamwood46 5 месяцев назад
It is easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
@jacksonelmore6227
@jacksonelmore6227 5 месяцев назад
That applies to you too
@ViDaGamesXLVince
@ViDaGamesXLVince 4 месяца назад
boooom
@dxt6650
@dxt6650 4 месяца назад
That's true
@coldie45
@coldie45 2 месяца назад
let's deny all scientific proof and decades of studies and believe in tooth fairy and santa Claus level of bullshit for a coping mechanism
@Jerrythebatman
@Jerrythebatman 5 месяцев назад
skepticism was the best tool I've ever learned since leaving religion and it's changed my life for the better. Unless you want to learn and expand your mind no amount of evidence will persuade a hard believer to open their eyes. The mind is a crazy thing and if you want something to be true then you will do whatever it takes to convince yourself its true and that's a terrible way to live.
@jeffreyerwin3665
@jeffreyerwin3665 5 месяцев назад
Wanting something to be false works the same way. . . . .. . . .. .
@Jerrythebatman
@Jerrythebatman 5 месяцев назад
@@jeffreyerwin3665 so what do people want to be false that science doesnt test for? Science does not make claims it can't test lol So please explain your reply
@jay-ti7kd
@jay-ti7kd 5 месяцев назад
@@jeffreyerwin3665 it may be But evidence is the name of the game. Religion n the concept of God has a lot of question marks and contradictions It is so easy for them to bend the rules in order to hold on to religion. Absolute lack of consistency which makes religion a joke
@irenehartlmayr8369
@irenehartlmayr8369 5 месяцев назад
​@@jay-ti7kdReligion is neither a joke nor does it bend the rules.What rules ? Science is about matter and religion is about a code of ethics. The two do not contradict each other in any way,smart ass.
@jeffreyerwin3665
@jeffreyerwin3665 5 месяцев назад
@@Jerrythebatman 32 scientists, many more collegues, four tons of equipment, five 24 hour days, three years of analyzing and cross-checking the evidence. Are you really that clueless?
@marlyndonnelly2206
@marlyndonnelly2206 5 месяцев назад
“Science is the poetry of reality” That’s beautiful 😢
@jacksonelmore6227
@jacksonelmore6227 5 месяцев назад
Sounds religious 🤔
@marlyndonnelly2206
@marlyndonnelly2206 5 месяцев назад
@@jacksonelmore6227 Elaborate.
@Muongoing.97c
@Muongoing.97c 5 месяцев назад
Honestly, it made me reconsider how I approach my day to day life as a physicist. Since the problems I work on are so mundane and outside the sphere of public interest, it can be so easy to lose that sense of wonder and have things become routine. I should do a better job of appreciating the majesty of the universe as I discover it (especially as with the track record of my papers, very few other people will ever know those things).
@thetruthaboutscienceandgod6921
@thetruthaboutscienceandgod6921 5 месяцев назад
@@Muongoing.97c God knows. And that's important.
@crusader5989
@crusader5989 5 месяцев назад
That speech by Hitchens is really something else, what a class the man had.
@Exjewatlarge
@Exjewatlarge 5 месяцев назад
I just listened to the first chapter of Carl Sagan’s “Cosmos” yesterday and I had a spiritual experience: I cried, I felt a profound sense of my finitude, and a deep sense of love and connection with all of the world around me.
@Artman1
@Artman1 5 месяцев назад
People who believe in Theism lose that connection to reality.
@razony
@razony 5 месяцев назад
When I was religious and struggling with the content of what I was reading. I was/am amazed how happy Christians are with the placebo they are taking. The delusion/placebo is so much better than the truth. They're happier with the story they been given than the reality that surrounds them. Every Sunday, they are popping the placebo into their minds until that one day they will get a surprise of their lives.
@mistylover7398
@mistylover7398 5 месяцев назад
IKR
@carrotbrainYT
@carrotbrainYT 5 месяцев назад
Yeah it's like taking drugs, why do you think people take drugs?
@razony
@razony 5 месяцев назад
@@carrotbrainYT Replace 'drugs' with religion.
@carrotbrainYT
@carrotbrainYT 5 месяцев назад
@@razony I know, people seek happiness that why isn't it? You left religion because you don't feel happy with that isn't it?
@razony
@razony 5 месяцев назад
@carrotbrain8978 I left Christianity because I didn't find tuth in it. The bible is a bunch of stories like Shakespearian or Stephen King novel. I had experiences as a child and thought religion could answer them. Instead, I got a bunch of control issues. Don't do this, Don't do that, do this and that this way or else. The bible stories are all manmade for control purposes only. I did find what I was looking for though.
@baggerdave
@baggerdave 5 месяцев назад
Science is the jewel in our species crown! Well said Mr Dawkins
@haydencarn8737
@haydencarn8737 5 месяцев назад
I honestly think religion is the biggest foe of spirituality. These days everything seems to be turned on its head. It's sad to see people falling into these patterns of madness while fighting over which religion/ideology and which one is the best, despite it all being nonsense.
@briobarb8525
@briobarb8525 5 месяцев назад
Well said!
@user-nz8uy1zm3z
@user-nz8uy1zm3z 5 месяцев назад
Without religion, there is no spirituality. In atheist materialism, all the love and feelings and thoughts you've ever had are just neurochemical reactions with no meaning. You face a bleak dark universe
@willchristie2650
@willchristie2650 5 месяцев назад
Everyone is fighting over metaphors.
@haydencarn8737
@haydencarn8737 5 месяцев назад
@@willchristie2650 Yeah, but, that is the only way religion can be defended. To make everything a metaphor, a suggestion, a hint, not as it seems, to make it so that nothing can be taken at face value. Because as soon as anything is taken at face value, the entire structure and believe begins to crumble since one flaw and error after the other become obvious. But if everything is a metaphor, and such, then it is all subjective, and in the end, anything and everything could be created with this method.
@johnrobert385mm
@johnrobert385mm 4 месяца назад
This !!! So sick to see people debatting which religion is the most valid . While everything they quote is from fictional thing written .
@sm0701
@sm0701 5 месяцев назад
One of my favourite pros for leaving religion is the freedom of thinking. Processing thoughts, fellings and ideas without the fear of God (or God filter) stopping you makes life on earth worth living. AND understanding the world around you is easier (at least that was the case for me).
@user-nz8uy1zm3z
@user-nz8uy1zm3z 5 месяцев назад
How is understanding the world easier? From my perspective, pretty much everything I witness and experience falls inline with the Biblical worldview
@apokalypthoapokalypsys9573
@apokalypthoapokalypsys9573 5 месяцев назад
​​@@user-nz8uy1zm3zwhat, like walking on water and cloning food? How come none of these miracles that break the laws of physics can ever be observed in the real world?
@user-nz8uy1zm3z
@user-nz8uy1zm3z 5 месяцев назад
@@apokalypthoapokalypsys9573 Because...they're miracles, like you said. They are supernatural acts done by God in the flesh.
@arshaddurrani3885
@arshaddurrani3885 5 месяцев назад
Slowly,gradually cobwebs of the mind have begun to untangle thoughts which are confused, and jumbled .Thanks to these men who have built on reason.
@jukkaahonen6557
@jukkaahonen6557 5 месяцев назад
The science pill should be red if you want to follow the Matrix meme. 😊 Anyway, I subbed.
@alfresco8442
@alfresco8442 5 месяцев назад
We are made from the elements on this planet. This planet is made from the elements created by long-dead stars, which accreted to form the solar system. We are therefore as much a part of the universe as a star, planet or anything else. It then follows that we are the first (and possibly the only) instance of that cold, unfeeling universe becoming self-aware. I find this to be far more profound and spiritually uplifting than anything in a holy book.
@jacksonelmore6227
@jacksonelmore6227 5 месяцев назад
You’re half right What you said is valid But what you deny, denies you This is why you don’t as easily resonate with tradition or myth That’s ok and good even But you ARE The All That Is You are “One With The Father” As Christ taught you
@alfresco8442
@alfresco8442 5 месяцев назад
@@jacksonelmore6227 You presume an awful lot about me from that single observation. Just as you presume that there is a father and a redeemer...for which you have no evidence whatsoever. Faith in the supernatural is a terribly limiting mindset. I speak from experience. And I'd be willing to bet I know considerably more about both mythology and Christianity than you do.
@jacksonelmore6227
@jacksonelmore6227 5 месяцев назад
@@alfresco8442 nothing is presumed, for all is Known The Father is a metaphysical metaphor, yet you say “there is no Father” Nothing need be redeemed, for All is already Perfect; yet your ego acknowledges no redeemer You say there is no evidence, when All Being is Self-Evident to The Self You speak of the “supernatural” as if All is not inherently natural You speak of a “mindset” when Mind is but One You claim to speak from experience, when both Infinity AND Nothing is Experienced You critique the faith that you clearly have, and demonstrate in your words and actions You’re totally valid, but you’re lacking self awareness I understand your point, but you do not understand mine I am not critiquing you from a theistic perspective Yet you rebut me as if I am My comment is to show you where you are lacking self awareness, I’m really poking at you, don’t take it personally, but observe how I just unraveled your whole intellectual ego with love
@hammalammadingdong6244
@hammalammadingdong6244 5 месяцев назад
@@jacksonelmore6227Kind of insulting, Jack. You presume your conclusion not in evidence, and fault others for not doing the same.
@jacksonelmore6227
@jacksonelmore6227 5 месяцев назад
@@hammalammadingdong6244 there is no conclusion, nor fault, nor presumption, nor “others” Lest they be your “evidence”
@matimus100
@matimus100 5 месяцев назад
Without science you wouldn't have the net
@darthvirgin7157
@darthvirgin7157 5 месяцев назад
i’m not gonna mince words. only the WEAK-MINDED need religion. what other paradigm provides the comfort of a watchful and vengeful patriarch, an infinite afterlife, the assurance of some kind of certainty, and most heinously a justification of your prejudices? i prefer having faith in the capacity of humankind to do great things. i prefer a finite life that is more valuable and must be valued. i much rather have all the questions that need to be asked, than supposed answers that can never be questioned. if you have a hard time accepting any of these, you do have a WEAK MIND.
@mistylover7398
@mistylover7398 5 месяцев назад
Same.
@aiya5777
@aiya5777 5 месяцев назад
aren't you projecting yourself? and you're actually the weak minded here
@aiya5777
@aiya5777 5 месяцев назад
the probability of you getting fully revived/ressurected/reconstructed by "somebody" is not 0 so you would be brought back from the state of death, a good as new it's possible and it doesn't go against the laws of physics
@mistylover7398
@mistylover7398 5 месяцев назад
@@aiya5777 how so?
@mistylover7398
@mistylover7398 5 месяцев назад
@@aiya5777 what's possible? And how to prove objective testable verifiable evidence??
@mdwoods100
@mdwoods100 5 месяцев назад
What a shame Hitchens is gone. He explains his viewpoint so well
@jacksonelmore6227
@jacksonelmore6227 5 месяцев назад
You like having someone charismatically represent your egoistic beliefs
@apokalypthoapokalypsys9573
@apokalypthoapokalypsys9573 5 месяцев назад
​@@jacksonelmore6227how is atheism egoistic? We're the ones who admit that we are just intelligent apes. You're the ones that claim to PERSONALLY know god.
@Teejaye1100
@Teejaye1100 5 месяцев назад
What a beautiful well put together video!! Here’s to reason and skepticism. 🍻🍻
@tcuisix
@tcuisix 5 месяцев назад
I think most people aren't hard evidentialists about their beliefs. We'll accept what we find comfort in accepting whether its fact or fiction
@carrotbrainYT
@carrotbrainYT 5 месяцев назад
True 👍👍
@blusheep2
@blusheep2 5 месяцев назад
Exactly. We are all "religious" in a way. Skeptical about what we DON'T want to believe and accepting of what we DO want to believe. Often without question.
@matthewforte5341
@matthewforte5341 5 месяцев назад
Can only waste so much time believing in the boogie man
@mistylover7398
@mistylover7398 5 месяцев назад
Called gawd
@jacksonelmore6227
@jacksonelmore6227 5 месяцев назад
You’re your own boogie man, yet you still believe Therefore you’re a hypocrite To speak from your ego like that
@mistylover7398
@mistylover7398 5 месяцев назад
@@jacksonelmore6227 🤨 wha?
@jacksonelmore6227
@jacksonelmore6227 5 месяцев назад
@@mistylover7398 he believes in his ego, to exist and post a comment at all, he believes in himself as an entity that can express ideas in a RU-vid comment, he is his own boogie man
@mistylover7398
@mistylover7398 5 месяцев назад
@jacksonelmore6227 dats da dumbest thing you've said lol. How stupid can you really get believers. Butthurt over everything yet gawd seems like da same ego. Again GET HELP DELUSIONAL BELIEVERS. 🤪
@psikeyhackr6914
@psikeyhackr6914 5 месяцев назад
Aren't the colors of the pills backwards in the thumbnail?
@drlegendre
@drlegendre 5 месяцев назад
Confused by "transcendent"? Yep, it sure gets thrown around a lot. But I'm still stuck on what "spiritual" even means. Once we're clear on that, then we can address these other blanket terms that everyone knows but no one can clearly define.
@irenehartlmayr8369
@irenehartlmayr8369 5 месяцев назад
That is the problem in this forum. Throwing around against religion but no knowledge of elementary words that have to do with religion.So what are you all talking about ?? The words can be looked up in any dictionary.And an educated person would know about the meaning straight away. Of course,materialists are narrow minded in their world views and therefore do not have these words in their vocabularies anyway,......
@chamicels
@chamicels 5 месяцев назад
@@irenehartlmayr8369 Of course...you know every single materialist in the entire universe.
@jacksonelmore6227
@jacksonelmore6227 5 месяцев назад
You’re very worried about definitions You’re egoistically attached to defining things accurately or correctly You’re valid, but why not submit to intuition and mysticism, before returning to logic and reason It means you surrender your need for logic, logically
@irenehartlmayr8369
@irenehartlmayr8369 5 месяцев назад
@@chamicels No,I don't and I don't agree with this narrow world view either.Therefore I don't need to know them.I think that they are on the wrong track.
@irenehartlmayr8369
@irenehartlmayr8369 5 месяцев назад
@@jacksonelmore6227 I am not " worried " about definitions but its useful to define things properly,before getting into discussions.Otherwise,its confused,if one doesn't even know what is being talked about.Common sense. And that has NOTHING whatsoever to do with being egoistic !! Another misuse of language. I am also attached to intuition and find mysticism attractive,no need to refer me to that! Intuition is basic to insight and understanding. Its advisable to use both. Both in science and elsewhere. Common sense !
@greenstargin5321
@greenstargin5321 5 месяцев назад
Religion aint the red pill thats for sure
@mistylover7398
@mistylover7398 5 месяцев назад
Wha
@Istandby666
@Istandby666 5 месяцев назад
If these gods exist for us. Who are the gods of those gods?
@blusheep2
@blusheep2 5 месяцев назад
What you have uncovered in your question is what is referred to as an infinite regression. Infinite regressions are logical absurdities. Therefore, the question forces us to conclude that there must be a "first God." One that is "necessary," meaning it exists in all possible worlds. It is uncreated and the cause of all that follows. That is why I reject all polytheistic religions.
@jacksonelmore6227
@jacksonelmore6227 5 месяцев назад
All things are synonymous There is only One God/One All That Is All sub-entities are therefore egoistic representations of the One All, they exist contextually, but not ultimately, don’t get hung up on it The Bible provides Fractal/Living Metaphor of this, but atheist types can’t hang with the metaphor due to the dogma of religious trauma
@ChipsMcClive
@ChipsMcClive 2 месяца назад
The best way to enjoy reality is to work to understand it.
@Eazy920318
@Eazy920318 4 месяца назад
I remember hating atheism 10 years ago ... now I find so much comfort in it.
@4legdfishman
@4legdfishman 5 месяцев назад
I can listen to these guys all day every day. ❤
@edwardvan5808
@edwardvan5808 3 месяца назад
Placebo. An word that helps describe the mind of men who deny the truth.. of man's condition.
@mickzammit6794
@mickzammit6794 5 месяцев назад
A placebo?? I've been saying it all my life. Obvious I say.
@jacksonelmore6227
@jacksonelmore6227 5 месяцев назад
You calling it a placebo all your life is your religion, that’s your placebo
@mickzammit6794
@mickzammit6794 5 месяцев назад
@@jacksonelmore6227 my religion is the wonder of the natural world that provides my life. It's no placebo and I attribute it to no form of religious god.
@jacksonelmore6227
@jacksonelmore6227 5 месяцев назад
@@mickzammit6794 the “wonder of the natural world that provides your life” is your god that you religiously adhere to It is your placebo because you have taken the I Am and made yourself know a part, which is your ego, rather than Know The All Itself You’re valid, but you may not have the eyes to see what I am saying, I am showing you how you are a hypocrite in the most innocent and naive way You don’t know you’re god You are the Christ
@mickzammit6794
@mickzammit6794 5 месяцев назад
@@jacksonelmore6227 you are the one who has it wrong. You recognise the natural order as the face of god. Whereas I see no act of a god in physical nature and no amount of religious persuasion will convince me of creation theory. I don't question it. This is me. The real me. No distinction between instinct and reason.
@jacksonelmore6227
@jacksonelmore6227 5 месяцев назад
@@mickzammit6794 I do not seek to persuade you of what you already know, You have an apparent intellectual insecurity, to assume I seek to convince you of anything I am no theist You say “this is me, the real me” yet you speak from your ego Read your own comments, you speak of your personal self and your opinions, and defend them You’d need not, lest your ego be your religion You are my God, as I Am Yours, for We are One
@jursamaj
@jursamaj 5 месяцев назад
Awe is pretty nice. But why call it "spirituality", and load on all the baggage that come with that term.
@jacksonelmore6227
@jacksonelmore6227 5 месяцев назад
It’s your baggage you carry
@EQ2snorkle
@EQ2snorkle 5 месяцев назад
Excellent watch, thank you.
@user-ug3ev7qo4s
@user-ug3ev7qo4s 5 месяцев назад
is "spiritual" even defined? that is just more mumbo jumbo. don't try to counteract religious BS by using religious BS words. science doesn't fulfill me "spiritually". i don't even know what that would mean. it's enlightening, fulfilling, empowering, interesting... to know how existence works. that's it. don't play their stupid word salad game.
@carrotbrainYT
@carrotbrainYT 5 месяцев назад
Science is a changing thing, first they said everything was made from atoms, then electrones protons, now quantum stuff, how do you make permanent decision on a changeable thing?
@Paine137
@Paine137 5 месяцев назад
@@carrotbrainYTThe mechanism of change is science’s strength, versus the baseless convictions of religious garbage.
@glenncurry3041
@glenncurry3041 5 месяцев назад
Yes in fact and Google would have answered that for you. Spirit means "to breath" or "breath". The Greeks called beans the “breath of life” and would not eat beans because they considered burps and farts to be the spirit leaving the body. Thus to be "spiritual" meant you were breathing. Maybe farting too loud?
@albertmiller3082
@albertmiller3082 5 месяцев назад
@@carrotbrainYT What “permanent decision” do you refer to…? Science is a moving target, because human insight is a perpetual motion engine. You seem to be injured that a promised certainty has been denied to you? So what if you are restrained from permanent certainty in a fundamentally mysterious universe? Carrot, put on your grown-up pants and face the reality of perpetual uncertainty. In the absence of conclusive evidence, clinging to an unproven and highly unlikely human-generated religious claim is burying your head in the proverbial sand. Maybe you can’t know what you don’t know yet. Nobody promised anyone a tidy certainty in this life, at least nobody honest. Not only is science “a changing thing” as you point out, remember, Carrotbrain, YOU are “a changing thing” too. Every second of every hour. 24/7/365. Relentless change. Get used to it. Being afraid of the inevitable ongoing reality that defines us all is no good way to endure. Being afraid is never easy and it isn’t fun.
@ready1fire1aim1
@ready1fire1aim1 5 месяцев назад
The 1D, 2D and 3D parts of yourself are "natural". The zero-of yourself is "not-natural". Atomic protons and neutrons (spatial extension) are natural. Subatomic quarks (no spatial extension) are not-natural. Zero is the most important number in mathematics and is both a real and an imaginary number with a horizon through it. Zero-dimensional space is the greatest dimension in physics and is both a real and an imaginary dimension with an event horizon through it.
@Hallowpoynt
@Hallowpoynt 5 месяцев назад
"I was created from what was left of the nutrition that my mother consumed, these very nutrients are little more than dust to my most obvious understanding." art, faith, philosophy, and science. "would have loved to ask him, what he searches for daily."
@aboutface102
@aboutface102 2 месяца назад
Science should be the red pill.
@jeffreyerwin3665
@jeffreyerwin3665 5 месяцев назад
The truth is that very, very, few people actually believe, and here is why. Mark 16:17 ---"Here are the signs that will be associated with believers: in my name they will cast out devils; they will have the gift of tongues; they will pick up snakes in their hands; and be unharmed should they drink deadly poison; they will lay their hands on the sick who will recover." I know many people who say that they believe, but I do not know a single one who does any of the afore mentioned deeds. I say that I believe, but I cannot do those things. What is really going on here is that those who purport to believe want others to do the actual "believing" for them. Persuading others to believe is an impossible task if one does not, himself, actually believe. In this age of science and astronomy, the Universe has become impossibly large, Who can believe that it is a creation by some kind of intelligence? Perhaps the best that one can do is simply to act as if one believed, and that would mean to follow the Law as given to us by the one who did believe: "Return good for evil."
@dxt6650
@dxt6650 4 месяца назад
What makes us superior to animals is Reason, so anything that clouds our reasoning is dangerous however comforting it might be, religion drunkenness drugs paranoia etc
@Fomites
@Fomites 5 месяцев назад
9:28 This is what Islam does today and Christianity did yesterday.
@rianmacdonald9454
@rianmacdonald9454 5 месяцев назад
The thumb nail - shouldn't the blue/red pill be the other way around? As in Science and discovery(being TRUTH) be the red pill.
@jacksonelmore6227
@jacksonelmore6227 5 месяцев назад
Science and spirituality are BOTH methods of DISCOVERY While Unconscious adherence to Religion or scientism are both methods of denial and ostriching Moving in good faith, in either method IS THE REDPILL if you do science or religion in bad faith you’re blue pilled
@peterkerruish8136
@peterkerruish8136 5 месяцев назад
Hey I love your website but could you please just run your adverts for say 30-60 seconds + then they stop. It's frustrating to be in the shower and then you blast me with a seemingly never ending advert about something I'm not interested in. M8 I know you need to make a quid but please don't milk it. Cheers.
@AlisonVerdi-lj1gw
@AlisonVerdi-lj1gw 5 месяцев назад
I find something more beautiful than the cosmos, and that is God.
@hammalammadingdong6244
@hammalammadingdong6244 5 месяцев назад
Still not as cool as silver rainbow flying unicorns, but agree to disagree.
@themasculinismmovement
@themasculinismmovement 5 месяцев назад
Spirituality is by definition the belief in a spirit and spirit world. It sounds like the person who did this talk didn't know thats what it is.
@mistylover7398
@mistylover7398 5 месяцев назад
Or magic. How you demonstrated da spirit world. Or iz Dat just fantasy beliefs.
@williamwilson6499
@williamwilson6499 3 месяца назад
Mark 14:51-52
@okiepita50t-town28
@okiepita50t-town28 5 месяцев назад
I’ll take rational reasoning over woo woo bs any day.
@blusheep2
@blusheep2 5 месяцев назад
I doubt it.
@jacksonelmore6227
@jacksonelmore6227 5 месяцев назад
I doubt it, putting faith in rational reasoning is woo woo
@evangelicalsnever-lie9792
@evangelicalsnever-lie9792 5 месяцев назад
I'd love to render an opinion, but YT will ❌ it.
@PrayingForTheMeteor
@PrayingForTheMeteor 5 месяцев назад
That thumbnail has things reversed...just saying.
@taserdom
@taserdom 5 месяцев назад
Hello there good sir. I believe there was a lot more of videos on your RU-vid channel. Since I haven’t watched them for a couple of months, I’m eager to know what’s the reason of their removal. All the best
@dorkception2012
@dorkception2012 5 месяцев назад
I'm not sure this guy in the video knows what spirituality mean, or what science mean.
@Ex_christian
@Ex_christian 5 месяцев назад
We know that the Christian cult ignore science for their make believe……..
@irenehartlmayr8369
@irenehartlmayr8369 5 месяцев назад
He probably doesn't because he is too stupid to understand.
@mistylover7398
@mistylover7398 5 месяцев назад
Then you demonstrate then.
@dorkception2012
@dorkception2012 5 месяцев назад
@@mistylover7398 Spirituality is absolutely non based on the scientific method. Science by concept does never claim anything is a fact till it is backed up by evidence and even then, it never claims it is 100% true. Spirituality maximum a hypothesis and a really bad one too.
@mistylover7398
@mistylover7398 5 месяцев назад
@@dorkception2012 🤨. So you don't believe in spirits and 👻??
@dagwould
@dagwould 5 месяцев назад
The great irony here is that to do science you are trading on the capital of Christianity. It wasn't Epicureans who made modern science. It wasn't Marxists (who wrecked everything they touched), it wasn't naturalists/materialists. It was Christians. Why? The reason is in the first two chapters of Genesis: it sets out the framework for understanding the world as > intelligible (because it was created in comprehensible propositional terms by a mind and with rational causality, as opposed to the nonsense causality of pagan myths) > differentiated from its creator: there are no 'spooks' who will be offended by science, > subject to mankind's intellect: Adam did the first science in classifying the animal kingdom ('naming the animals brought to him), and instructed to subdue: that is, to understand, care for and maintain the earth/cosmos. It sets out why science is possible, desirable and indeed, essential to mankind's well being. We know God created the world for our habitation and prosperity and so are confident to study it, with a joyful faith that as a coherent intelligible world, we will gain knowledge. Naturalism only has a pile of dust and any action by that pile of dust other than to enable its continuation, has no inherent meaning. And even its continuation (by Dawkins' magic genes) has no meaning. Science without God will degenerate into a political power play...which is what we now see.
@Lordidude
@Lordidude 5 месяцев назад
Only because YOU can't find meaning in life without a god/goddess does not mean anyone else can't. Atheists have more to live for because we understand we do not have an infinite life.
@chamicels
@chamicels 5 месяцев назад
boogie boogie boo
@blusheep2
@blusheep2 5 месяцев назад
@@Lordidude Not believing in an afterlife doesn't give you more to live for. What do you think you are living for that I am not. I don't want to die tomorrow. I want to be healthy and maximize my time on earth. I want to be financially successful enough to do the things I wish to do. Nothing about my belief in the afterlife necessitates that I have less to live for then you. The difference between me and you is that I have something more profound to live for. Something I can't turn on and off whenever I feel like doing it or don't.
@Lordidude
@Lordidude 5 месяцев назад
@@blusheep2 Your life on earth means nothing compared to the afterlife you aim towards. I just don't want to waste the one life I know of to prepare for an afterlife that was never proven. Not by the Greek, not by the Vikings and certainly not by the Christians.
@blusheep2
@blusheep2 5 месяцев назад
@@Lordidude _for an afterlife that was never proven._ You don't see anything wrong with this statement? I do. I don't come to my conclusion about an afterlife out of thin air. It is because I have been convinced of a series of things that have formed my beliefs. Because of this I trust in the promise of an afterlife. The way you describe the situation is that you aren't concerned with truth. Your concerned with not having doubt. So your position isn't about evidence or reason but about "proof." Don't you think this is not only a standard set to high but that you are likely a hypocrite when it comes to it? I'd wager if we examine your beliefs we will find many beliefs you hold to without proof, but when the topic is about God, all of a sudden "proof" is the standard. What does that suggest your belief is really based on? Answer: Probably desire. You likely don't want God to be true so you set your standard so high that you don't have to consider anything else. You can dismiss all the evidences and reasons that point to God because you can always appeal to some unknown and therefore judge the argument is defunct because it doesn't reach your standard. _Your life on earth means nothing compared to the afterlife you aim towards._ Are you trying to define what my life means to me? My life is intimately connected with the afterlife, but I'm not preparing for it. I feel that its a gift that came from love. For that reason I'm compelled to love others and care how my actions effect those around me. To look out for those in need and I can't just turn it on and off when I don't feel like loving or encounter an enemy or a person I would think of as unlovable. So again, how can you say that I don't value my life and time on earth as much as you do? How can you say you have more to live for.
@Joe-bx4wn
@Joe-bx4wn 5 месяцев назад
Science is Happiness bumper sticker. You might not sell too many. Jus saying.
@bulwinkle
@bulwinkle 5 месяцев назад
Well said.
@bretherenlee1404
@bretherenlee1404 5 месяцев назад
Is this a no to evolution?
@jeffreyerwin3665
@jeffreyerwin3665 4 месяца назад
The "placebo" is atheism which allows people to think that they have no obligation to their Creator.
@hammalammadingdong6244
@hammalammadingdong6244 4 месяца назад
Speaking of obligations: Demonstrate any creator exists.
@jeffreyerwin3665
@jeffreyerwin3665 4 месяца назад
@@hammalammadingdong6244 We played the pipes for you, and you wouldn't dance; we sang dirges, and you wouldn't mourn.
@hammalammadingdong6244
@hammalammadingdong6244 4 месяца назад
@@jeffreyerwin3665 cool. Now where’s that demonstration?
@jeffreyerwin3665
@jeffreyerwin3665 4 месяца назад
@@hammalammadingdong6244 Sir, I do not dance to your tune, and I do not mourn to your dirges.
@hammalammadingdong6244
@hammalammadingdong6244 4 месяца назад
@@jeffreyerwin3665 - so, no demonstration. Got it.
@dennisguilder1
@dennisguilder1 5 месяцев назад
What’s the song
@SpiritLevel888
@SpiritLevel888 5 месяцев назад
Too many seeking truth *fail to find* 'cos they're easily *led astray* by worldly wealth (or logic), sensuality, alluring esoterism or specious mysticisms. *I know I was.* I'm an ex neo-vedantic (hindu roots) new ager. I used to be into so much "cosmic/spiritual" stuff: trance channelings, ancient wisdom, gnosticism, psychedelic drugs, hindu gurus and buddhist variants. Lke so many I was illuminated by the *kundalini (serpent) spirit* then 8 years ago I got rightly enlightened by the *Holy Spirit* - who showed me what a *fool* I was before..... Spirit led to the REAL *Yahusha/Jesus Christ* and everything changed - *Paradigm Shifted.* This is being *BORN AGAIN* (John 3) and it's an ongoing surprise to me 😁 Spirituality is a *soul serious business* taken way too lightly by *far too many* ..... ....... the *end-times* are dead ahead; a time of tribulation and Antichrist is near. Sadly, it escapes the notice of our self-absorbed, glamour-saturated world that we're in a spiritual war for souls. The immensity of ignorance is astonishing: the dark powers are *bedazzling* the minds of the masses (Ephesians 6:12). We've inherited ancient spiritual subversion.... *the Earth is fallen* .... The holistic fields of nature are *degraded.* Morphic resonance is *out of affinity* with DIVINITY. *Death* is all too familiar. Natural life hunts, *kills* and feeds on itself. Humanity is a spiritually *fallen race* highly prone to *deceit* and *delusion.* Frankly, we need a *SAVIOUR* and by *Jesus Christ* we have a *GREAT ONE* As a new ager I couldn't believe (I was damn sure I knew better) but in the *Light of Spirit* Jesus really is the *Way, the truth and the Life* just like He said, and He wasn't lying or mistaken, there's NO deception in HIM..... *no one* comes to God except through JESUS..... there's no other way (Matthew 7:13-14). Being a neo-vedantist I wasn't convinced but *turns out* the Bible is *Spirit breathed,* written by men inspired by the *Holy Spirit.* Jesus is vividly portrayed and endorsed in the new testament, in fact he's apparent in the old testament too (Luke 24:27 & 44) and by *His LIGHT* we're allowed to *see* that and *know Him* ..... Any previously perceived discrepancies or contradictions are ironed out and the supernatural narrative flows most beautifully..... ..... the Bible is the Revelation of *Jesus Christ* (Isaiah 2:2-4; 9:6-7 & 45:23, Daniel 7:13-14, Matthew 28:18, Mark 14:62, Revelation 1:7-8 & 18, Rev 19:11-21)
@dorkception2012
@dorkception2012 5 месяцев назад
LOL, so you think logic makes you astray from the truth? LOLOLOLOL Yes, if you are a wishful thinker. Do you know why logic, science and all mentally honest methodology work and why prayers don't? Because the falsifiable ones always turn out to be true, while unfalsifiable ones lead to unfounded claims. Get a grip sometimes!
@jeffreyerwin3665
@jeffreyerwin3665 5 месяцев назад
Those that insist that science has replaced religion ignore science when it falsifies that hypothesis. (LOL!)
@hammalammadingdong6244
@hammalammadingdong6244 5 месяцев назад
Can you elaborate?
@jeffreyerwin3665
@jeffreyerwin3665 5 месяцев назад
@@hammalammadingdong6244 I could, if I wanted to.
@cristianpopescu78
@cristianpopescu78 5 месяцев назад
But it works: Tammy Peterson rosary testimony Atheismus dont
@brendonlake1522
@brendonlake1522 5 месяцев назад
Interesting putting 'placebo' in the title because the placebo effect is a real thing that science struggles to explain. It is also a fact that so many Nobel laureates are believers in God.
@hammalammadingdong6244
@hammalammadingdong6244 5 месяцев назад
It's a metaphor - religion has an effect. That's doesn't make it true. Placebos have an effect. That doesn't mean they actually work.
@brendonlake1522
@brendonlake1522 5 месяцев назад
@@hammalammadingdong6244 one needs to define 'work' because with the placebo effect something is definitely happening there, something even more profound than testing a drug. Something the drug companies probably aren't a fan of.
@raysalmon6566
@raysalmon6566 5 месяцев назад
John 18:37 New International Version 37 “You are a king, then!” said Pilate. Jesus answered, “You say that I am a king. In fact, the reason I was born and came into the world is to testify to the truth. Everyone on the side of truth listens to me.” ***
@Lordidude
@Lordidude 5 месяцев назад
You are brainwashed.
@hammalammadingdong6244
@hammalammadingdong6244 5 месяцев назад
Quote from a book of claims.
@albertmiller3082
@albertmiller3082 5 месяцев назад
When we “die” we DO go ‘over the lip of the Event Horizon’ as literally as an idiot in a barrel goes over Niagara Falls. Insofar as dying is the ultimate outbound experience, beholding oneself in transition is entirely possible. In advance of the final “command performance” it is recommended one becomes well acquainted with objectively beholding oneself. When beholding oneself successfully is the objective, what means are employed becomes paramount. Materially, using a vanity mirror is certainly a means. Intellectually beholding oneself as well as emotionally beholding oneself at the same time would recommend itself as a means to achieve that end.
@Paine137
@Paine137 5 месяцев назад
Barf.
@albertmiller3082
@albertmiller3082 5 месяцев назад
@@Paine137 I am moved by your thoughtful remark, Pain. How generous of you to devote precious time to reading my post and then succumbing to the impulse to comment publicly. Judging by your brevity, I am guessing you’re pressed for time. All the more poignant that you’ve offered a considered response. Life is a journey, Pain, and it’s all the sweeter knowing folks like you are along for the ride! 😎
@ready1fire1aim1
@ready1fire1aim1 5 месяцев назад
[infinity and zero, theology, soul]: in·fin·i·ty MATHEMATICS a number greater than any assignable quantity or countable number (symbol ∞). (In counting numbers 0 is the subject whereas positive integers "1, 2, 3 and 4 etc" are the objects). What is the meaning of zero in Webster's dictionary? a. : the arithmetical symbol 0 or 0̸ denoting the absence of all magnitude or quantity. b. : additive identity. specifically : the number between the set of all negative numbers and the set of all positive numbers. Zero is the most important number in mathematics and is both a real and an imaginary number with a horizon through it. Zero-dimensional space is the greatest dimension in physics and is both a real and an imaginary dimension with an event horizon through it. Isn't⚡God⚡supposed to be outside of space (1D, 2D, 3D) and time (4D)? Well, 0D is outside of space and time: 0D (not-natural) = dimensionless and timeless 1D, 2D, 3D (natural) = spatial dimensions 4D (natural) = temporal dimension Read Leibniz's Monadology 📖 and consider that the Monad is the zero-dimensional space binding our quarks together with the strong force (it is). The other side of the Monad is Monos (Alone) and this side is Monas (Singularity) and there's an event horizon between them. So El/Elohim or Theos/Logos etc pick your language. Quarks are dimensionless (no size) and timeless (not-natural). The two main quark spin configs two-down, one-up (subatomic to neutron) and two-up, one-down (subatomic to proton) could easily be construed as the male (upward facing trinity) and female (downward facing trinity) image that Elohim made us in during Genesis 1. Quarks (no spatial extension) experience all 3 fundamental forces plus have a fractional electric charge⚡and that's why protons and neutrons (spatial extension) have electrons orbiting around them. In Geometry any new dimension has to contain within it all previous dimensions. This holds true with it being impossible for atomic protons and neutrons (spatial extension) to exist without subatomically containing within themselves quarks (no spatial extension). "Something (spatial extension) from Nothing (no spatial extension)". A) The postulated soul, 👻, has 1. no spatial extension 2. zero size 3. exact location only B) Quarks are mass with no size measured in Megaelectron Volts. Mass with no size is a unique equation in that it has no spatial extension. Conclusion: A and B are the same thing.
@albertmiller3082
@albertmiller3082 5 месяцев назад
@@ready1fire1aim1 I know what you mean.
@elguapo2831
@elguapo2831 5 месяцев назад
Blind faith in evolution from nothing with a dash of deep time👍 I don't have enough faith to be an atheist.
@thetruthaboutscienceandgod6921
@thetruthaboutscienceandgod6921 5 месяцев назад
Well said!
@hammalammadingdong6244
@hammalammadingdong6244 5 месяцев назад
Evolution is an observed fact. "Nothing" is not entailed. "Deep Time" is indicated by the available evidence. No faith required.
@twosheds1749
@twosheds1749 5 месяцев назад
I think I have enough faith to believe a talking snake is real! As far as evolution goes, none of it explains the bio diversity of life, the purpose of malaria or why 98% of all species that have ever existed are now extinct!! Or why animals and plants change and adapt from the original species when they become isolated over hundreds of years!!
@BubbaF0wpend
@BubbaF0wpend 5 месяцев назад
Ahh yes, the frank turek mimic, one of the more pitiful examples of what xtianity does to non-skeptical minds.
@elguapo2831
@elguapo2831 5 месяцев назад
@@BubbaF0wpend People who believe in evolution obviously have never been skeptical. Do you enjoy fairytales about Deep Time? Deep Time, by Bill Nye. Once upon Deep Time there was a 🐸 that turned into a 🤴 from Deep Time. The End
@ericbrown8586
@ericbrown8586 5 месяцев назад
Flat
@jeffreyerwin3665
@jeffreyerwin3665 5 месяцев назад
Yeah, science is the true path. but it is funny how those who do not like the idea of the supernatural insist on ignoring science when it contradicts their naturalistic viewpoint. Circular reasoning is often employed in that endeavor: "The images cannot be authentic,, because, to be authentic they would have to be miraculous, and miracles are not possible."--- ---Circular reasoning. The only people who are better at ignoring science are those in the Flat Earth Society (LOL!)
@rickdelatour5355
@rickdelatour5355 5 месяцев назад
Specifically what do you feel contradicts the “naturalistic viewpoint”?
@jeffreyerwin3665
@jeffreyerwin3665 5 месяцев назад
@@rickdelatour5355 24 scientists, four tons of instrumentation, five 24 hour days, three years of analyzing and cross-checking the evidence. You have got to be in serious denial my friend.
@rickdelatour5355
@rickdelatour5355 5 месяцев назад
@@jeffreyerwin3665 so you don’t actually have anything huh? Maybe don’t make claims you can’t back up. Save yourself from further embarrassment.
@user-qg1kb8ih3g
@user-qg1kb8ih3g 5 месяцев назад
@@jeffreyerwin3665evidence of what
@jacksonelmore6227
@jacksonelmore6227 5 месяцев назад
Science and Spirituality ARE the SAME path, yet people claim they are different
@MMAGUY13
@MMAGUY13 5 месяцев назад
I watch to hear his argument that there is no God I heard nothing
@hammalammadingdong6244
@hammalammadingdong6244 5 месяцев назад
No need to disprove what is not evident.
@MMAGUY13
@MMAGUY13 5 месяцев назад
@@hammalammadingdong6244 yes we’re just pulling this out of our butt holes. The universe coming from nothing in the universe is fine tuned nature did not make life so who did there’s information in our bodies there are zeros and ones in the fabric of space like a computer program. Oh, this is not Rich, Rich information and good arguments, right please the evidence is overwhelming and many cosmologist will tell you it’s overwhelming for a design personal experience near death experience where does consciousness come from the resurrection of Jesus Christ oh my God
@MMAGUY13
@MMAGUY13 5 месяцев назад
Yes I know we pull this out of our butt hole. The universe did not come from nothing the universe didn’t come into existence finally tuned there’s no way nature made life and that’s what science is showing and then even if I give you life it’s 10 to the 20th power from bacteria to change into advanced life, there’s only 10 to 80th power atoms in the universe then we don’t have personal experience with God then we don’t have Bible prophecies that came true the resurrection of Jesus Christ they don’t know where consciousness comes from. There’s information in your DNA there’s zeros and ones in the fabric space 321 ratio all over nature mathematically yes we’re pulling this hunch that there’s a God out of our butt hole.
@MMAGUY13
@MMAGUY13 5 месяцев назад
Third time I’m leaving this comment and it keeps getting taken off we are not pulling this out of the air. The universe came from nothing. The universe is fine-tuned. Nature doesn’t have the ability to make life the probability of evolution turning bacteria into advanced life is 10 to 200th power there is information inside our bodies inside DNA there is zeros and ones in the fabric space, there’s the mystery of consciousness near death experience for filming of prophecies, and the resurrection of Jesus Christ. We have so much evidence for what we believe.
@drsatan9617
@drsatan9617 5 месяцев назад
​@@MMAGUY13 your comments aren't taken down. RU-vid just sucks
@Masterdebator881
@Masterdebator881 5 месяцев назад
This is dumb. Space is fake! Can’t get back to the moon? Really? Really??
@Shutyourmouth20
@Shutyourmouth20 5 месяцев назад
I’m . . . assuming you’re trolling.
@Lordidude
@Lordidude 5 месяцев назад
​@@Shutyourmouth20 I'm assuming they are brainwashed.
@Masterdebator881
@Masterdebator881 5 месяцев назад
@@Shutyourmouth20 Correct, you’re ASSuming.
@youtubestudiosucks978
@youtubestudiosucks978 5 месяцев назад
​@@Masterdebator881 you're not acting like your name would imply. Debate them if you're really a master at it.
@Masterdebator881
@Masterdebator881 5 месяцев назад
@@youtubestudiosucks978 I’m not an actor. What debate? Nobody offered up one. Would you like to try me?
@peterjones6507
@peterjones6507 5 месяцев назад
Don't bother to listen. It's just another ignorant talk about religion. These people love to display their failure to examine the issues. He clearly has never studied the relevant topics. He seems to think religion is what he was taught in Sunday school as a child, and never grew up. Even as a atheist it makes me mad.
@Hexsmasher2099
@Hexsmasher2099 5 месяцев назад
Same brother
@Apsua72
@Apsua72 5 месяцев назад
All religions seem intolerant until you compare them to atheism - former atheist. How to think like an atheist: 1. reject evidence because it´s supernatural. 2. reject evidence because it´s not supernatural. Basically reject everything. Four miracles of atheism: 1. getting something from nothing 2. getting life from non-life 3. getting order from chaos 4. getting the immaterial from physical matter.
@LastBastian
@LastBastian 5 месяцев назад
Congratulations on not understanding what atheism is.
@BubbaF0wpend
@BubbaF0wpend 5 месяцев назад
Hey everyone, come check out this army of burning strawmen!
@Lordidude
@Lordidude 5 месяцев назад
"Former atheist". Hahahaha what a moron.
@henryschmit3340
@henryschmit3340 5 месяцев назад
You wouldn't have science without religion. All the major branches of modern science were started by Bible believing creationists.
@hammalammadingdong6244
@hammalammadingdong6244 5 месяцев назад
Even if we grant that, it’s not an argument that those religions are actually true, only that they were useful.
@hammalammadingdong6244
@hammalammadingdong6244 5 месяцев назад
It also fails to establish causality.
@user-ex4wx1rj7s
@user-ex4wx1rj7s 5 месяцев назад
I can only assume that this spurious term “all the major branches of modern science” is somehow intended to exclude the extraordinary scientific achievements of ancient cultures in China, Egypt, Greece or the Roman Empire. Modern western scientists could hardly be expected to be other than majoritarily Christian after centuries of religious persecution and an all-powerful church in league with despotic absolute monarchs. Heretics didn’t get let off with a mild ticking off in the days of the inquisition. Scientific discoveries did not necessarily undermine theistic belief, but they frequently came into conflict with church dogma. There was water above the “firmament”, until the church could get round to admitting that there wasn’t. The Earth could not possibly rotate on its axis or revolve around the sun, again until the church could find a way of accepting scientific fact without admitting they were wrong. Darwin, in the mid 19th century, suffered the ire of the church for suggesting that we were not created in our present form. It was 100 years before the Pope recognised the compatibility of evolution alongside creation doctrine, and another 50 years before the Vatican finally admitted that evolution is more than a mere hypothesis. It took the Vatican over 350 years to apologise to Galileo. Hardly surprising then, that atheist scientists have been in the minority until the latter part of the 20th century.
@drsatan9617
@drsatan9617 5 месяцев назад
We wouldn't have our modern understanding of science, perhaps but science is a methodology Literally all lifeforms use a primitive, and incomplete version of the scientific method
@henryschmit3340
@henryschmit3340 5 месяцев назад
@@hammalammadingdong6244 Real science and logic has long established that eveything, including life did not make itself. The cause of everything can only be as a result of an eternal, uncaused cause. Without an uncaused cause you would be stuck with an infinite regression -- you could never get to the first cause, which is illogical and unscientific. "..it's not an argument that those religions are actually true." I'm referring to Biblical Christianity. Their science was based on an understanding that the Biblical account is true. Their science being true is a good argument that the Bible is true.
@michelangelope830
@michelangelope830 5 месяцев назад
God is the most important idea that shapes all our understanding of reality. Reality can not be explained without God. The only way that what has a beginning of existence or creation can exist is if God exists. Is not the end of atheism what you always wanted? Is not the end of atheism what you say you want? Logically it is impossible the existence of an infinite number of causes and effects, therefore an eternal first uncaused cause that caused what has a beginning of existence must exist. God is the first uncaused cause, that's it!, that's all! And if the universe was created from an incredibly powerful and intelligent entity we have to expect rationally an eternal surprise when we die. Would you do me a favor and memorize and understand the atheist logical fallacy because future generations would understand what humanity don't want to understand. The truth is atheism is a logical fallacy that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist. I know what is atheism because atheists have explained it to me almost infinite times. A logical fallacy is an error of reasoning that leads to the wrong conclusion, a misunderstanding of reality. I am trying to overcome the most severe and devastating censorship in history. Do you think I am joking talking about God? God is literally everything that exist past, present and future, not a horror tale to scare and control kids. God is reality, substance. Life matters because God exists. To discover God exists you have to understand reality is eternal because from nothing can not be created something, something always existed. Emergency! Thank you.
@hammalammadingdong6244
@hammalammadingdong6244 5 месяцев назад
Full of faulty reasoning and presuppositions. I’ll pass.
@michelangelope830
@michelangelope830 5 месяцев назад
@@hammalammadingdong6244 This conversation is getting interesting, I like it. You don't have to explain to me what is or is not atheism because atheists have explained it to me almost infinite times, and I was a fool for too many years. I am not religious and I know God exists because logically the creation can not exist without the creator because from nothing can not be created something. Did you hear and understand what I just said? I didn't say I believe in God, I said I know God exists. Is it possible to know if the universe was created from an intelligent entity? Atheism is the belief immune to arguments that all reality is created, and that's why atheists remark "who created god?". To understand God exists you have to understand it is impossible that all reality is created. Atheism is blind faith in the impossible. Atheists want what is impossible and worse for them because without God life lacks an ultimate purpose and death is terrifying, and they sell the lie to their own innocent and vulnerable children. If God was created God would be the creation that needs the creator. It is impossible logically the existence of an infinite number of causes and effects, therefore an eternal first uncaused cause that caused what has a beginning of existence must exist. God is the first uncaused cause it is not talked about, that's it!, that's all. I think God is simply everything that exist past present and future. It is just an idea that can not do harm to anyone. For atheists intelligence is created from non intelligence, again an imposible leapt of faith. I don't want to debate with you. I will repeat because it is very important and to avoid excuses. I don't want to debate with you, I want to overcome the most severe and devastating censorship in history. I need the discovery that atheism is a logical fallacy to be news. The truth is atheism is a logical fallacy that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist. It is important that you understand I am not asking you to agree with me and future generations would understand what you don't want to. Stop pretending to be dumb and share! share! share! Stop pretending you are better than me. Emergency! Is not the end of the war in Gaza and Ukraine what you want? Share! Share! Share! Thank you.
@hammalammadingdong6244
@hammalammadingdong6244 5 месяцев назад
@@michelangelope830 nope. Theists: we believe god exists. Atheists: we don’t believe you. End of story.
@michelangelope830
@michelangelope830 5 месяцев назад
@@hammalammadingdong6244 This conversation is getting interesting, I like it. You don't have to explain to me what is or is not atheism because atheists have explained it to me almost infinite times, and I was a fool for too many years. I am not religious and I know God exists because logically the creation can not exist without the creator because from nothing can not be created something. Did you hear and understand what I just said? I didn't say I believe in God, I said I know God exists. Is it possible to know if the universe was created from an intelligent entity? Atheism is the belief immune to arguments that all reality is created, and that's why atheists remark "who created god?". To understand God exists you have to understand it is impossible that all reality is created. Atheism is blind faith in the impossible. Atheists want what is impossible and worse for them because without God life lacks an ultimate purpose and death is terrifying, and they sell the lie to their own innocent and vulnerable children. If God was created God would be the creation that needs the creator. It is impossible logically the existence of an infinite number of causes and effects, therefore an eternal first uncaused cause that caused what has a beginning of existence must exist. God is the first uncaused cause it is not talked about, that's it!, that's all. I think God is simply everything that exist past present and future. It is just an idea that can not do harm to anyone. For atheists intelligence is created from non intelligence, again an imposible leapt of faith. I don't want to debate with you. I will repeat because it is very important and to avoid excuses. I don't want to debate with you, I want to overcome the most severe and devastating censorship in history. I need the discovery that atheism is a logical fallacy to be news. The truth is atheism is a logical fallacy that assumes God is the religious idea of the creator of the creation to conclude wrongly no creator exists because a particular idea of God doesn’t exist. It is important that you understand I am not asking you to agree with me and future generations would understand what you don't want to. Stop pretending to be dumb and share! share! share! Stop pretending you are better than me. Emergency! Is not the end of the war in Gaza and Ukraine what you want? Share! Share! Share! Thank you.
@hammalammadingdong6244
@hammalammadingdong6244 5 месяцев назад
@@michelangelope830 oh. You’re a bot. Got it.
Далее
Why Science Eradicates the Religious World View
11:13
Музыкальные пародии
00:28
Просмотров 19 тыс.
ПОЁМ НАРОДНЫЕ ПЕСНИ🪗
2:04:11
Просмотров 1,1 млн
Why Organized Religion Undermines Morality
12:38
Просмотров 18 тыс.
Did Jesus Exist?
26:19
Просмотров 3,9 млн
The Laws of Stupidity
11:06
Просмотров 63 тыс.
Why Is God Evil? | Three Body Problem
15:22
Просмотров 475 тыс.
The Best Arguments against Religion on Morality
10:13
Why Religion Does more Harm than Good in the World
12:20