I do remember those old times audiophiles asked why some CD players sound better if it’s digital. In the 90’s I’ve read somewhere in Stereophile magazine digital is all the same ‘till you trying to convert it to analogue. The question ‘why it’s so’ is kinda complicated for audiophiles without deep fundamental knowledges in that area. Just take it as it is))
So where is the AirLens streamer these days? Could find no such product on your site, not even much mention, except when speaking of a discontinued Octave Records streamer .....
I still have a vintage enlightened audio designs dsp-9000 pro series 3 that uses at&t fibre. I think bel canto that lets you go from usb to at&t into a dac. Not many interfaces like that out there .
AES 67 Ravena is an existing standard that will move 32 ch. of 11.2 mhz DSD today via Cat 6 Gigabit ethernet, either copper or fiber. It would be cool to see that as a standard for moving Audio around home equipment instead of just pro equipment.
@@r423sdex That is a generalization that can be true or not depending on the DAC. A higher end DAC may have an isolator and a reclocker built in. If so, your point is valid and the air lens might be redundant. But many will not.
My house is connected by a fiber optic line. The optical interface is connected with Cat 6e cable to a modem/router. Then Cat 6e to streamer/TV. Streamer outputs to my preamp by Toslink, as does the TV. We hear nothing we're not supposed to.
If galvanic is so important, why can't we connect an iPhone to a DAC via FiberOptic ? There are simple device that connect and convert from iPhone lighting to TosLink or Coax. No noisy 110V power involvement at all. Jusy my battery operated cell phone , right ?
Finally someone not trying to convince me that a TCP package is different depending on how you transmit it. There are so many snake oil sellers out there that try to explain how jitter on an ethernet network can end up in your DAC, which is just stupid. Thanks a lot for not making your streamer any miracle box!
i have connected my daily pc to my AV system this way i can enjoy good sound in different scenarios all day long. From all connections available in my set up /HDMI,RCA and optical/ i choose optical SPDIF from PC to receiver for best quality
Why don't you just continue to use AT&T glass? It's still a thing, and is still used today for audio by companies like Playback Designs, and Ed Meitner at EMM Labs.
Umm Is this absolutely true? The "noise" is normally below the hearing range of 120dB Sound "quality" per se , as far as I know , cannot be measured . It is subjectively compared on an A B listening test.
When streaming lossless music (FLAC or other), the original music data can easily arrive bit-perfect at the DAC with no errors or conversions when the app is made with sufficient care. Neither jitter hurting the sample timing or digital noise leaking into the analog output are problems that should ever be a concern with just the basic of proper engineering done. I’m confident PS audio can support most excellent audio streaming exceeding CD or even SACD quality. Streaming is here to stay and also here to deliver the best in audiophile performance.
I have linns new top of the range organic streamer .I have been to hifi show and listened to others , cheaper and dearer and it is like night and day , it sounds like music while the others sound like stereos , no feeling to the music in my opinion anyway
@@hughkleinsc8949 Odd to compare the streamer in your system to ones used in completely different systems and rooms and draw a clear conclusion about just the streamers. It makes especially little sense if one has all the necessary gear already and just want a streamer that will do nothing but put out the raw digital signal, as the streamer won't be doing anything to that signal in that case.
Do you know what? Ive looked into streaming, servers, DACS, UPnP, NAS, upgraded power supplies, monthly subscriptions, installing apps, updates, creating accounts and logging in, resetting passwords etc etc, and you still own nothing and are relying on an internet connection. I simply cannot be bothered. I'd rather stick a CD or record on and enjoy it ...Yes, Im sad. Tired of this never ending arms race, and the irony is, everyone is focussed on the tech instead of making great music. The music of this era is, by and large, appalling..Ruined by software. Even Country is infected with Autotune and quantizing to a grid. Music to an algorithm. Nah.
@@googoo-gjoob it was clear as day that he lied about saying they did really great with it meaning they sold a bunch of them. Even a child could have figured it out and that's why they got rid of just that part
LMAO!!!!!!!! I CALLED IT!!!!! PAUL LIED....THE ORIGINAL VIDEO SAID THEY ARE SELLING IT........AND ITS DOING VERY WELL! WOW. PAUL, YOU SHOULD BE ASHAMED. ITS DISGUSTING THAT YOU HAVE TO LIE ABOUT SALES. REALLY, REALLY SAD.
@@googoo-gjoob that's exactly what he meant was selling it that's why they edited it. Notice they took out the part of it's doing well. It's clear as day but if you want to pretend it didn't happen keep on living in your fantasy world
@@ryanschipp8513 you were wrong before. youre still wrong. i expect that happens a lot. you completely misunderstood & distorted his meaning. let it go.
@@googoo-gjoob funny how sooooo many people "misunderstood" what he said. Comment after comment said they couldn't see it for sale on the website, perhaps it is you that is under the illusion of what was said.