Why Umbridge Is The WORST Kind of EVIL | Harry Potter Film Theory 

Want to discuss where the characters should be placed further?! Join our Discord server and chat with us directly! www.patreon.com/SuperCarlinBrothers

I think Griphook is a really good example of true neutral. He even says: “we goblins do not pick sides, this is a wizards war.”

True neutral: The night bus driver. Breaks too many traffic laws to be lawful, but keeps too tight a schedule to be chaotic. Will drive Bellatrix just as soon as Harry.

tbh, I think Narcissa is a true neutral. She doesn't pick sides. She helps voldemort for her husband and she helps harry for her son. I thinks she is perfect for this catagory cuz she doesn't support either side she's just looking out for her family.

Olivander is True Neutral. He spoke of Voldemort doing great things and doing terrible things and sold the wand to Voldemort in the beginning. He seems to be pretty close to true neutral

The Whomping Willow is true neutral. Good, bad, lawful, chaotic, it don't care, it'll still beat you senseless.

My first thought for the "True Neutral" category was the centaurs, at least minus Firenze and for most of the series. They are dedicated to keeping to themselves and not getting involved with the bigger conflict, and even seem to leave long-term planning to astrology; that is, deferring to something completely outside their control.

Fenrir Greyback also fits Chaotic Evil along with Bellatrix.

Love how the black sisters basically sit diagonally in the grid. I mean, Andy is probably lawfully good, Cissa is a true neutral and Bella is a chaotic evil!

True neutral to me is clearly Olivander. Admiring Voldemort for his powers, but not supporting him and giving Harry Information, but not helping or supporting him. He only cares about wands.

chaotic good is literally the weasly twins and hagrid, they're good people but make their own rules and ignore others. They fight for the good cause but as the twins say, they love breaking rules and will dabble across it a bit.

I really thought that Aberforth was going to be the example for Lawful Neutral and Mundungus of Neutral Neutral. Mundungus really didn't care about picking a side, he was just following whoever was winning and his only interests were saving himself. I think that was a great example.

True Neutral: Moaning Myrtle, she was in the room each time the chamber was opened in Chamber of Secrets and never turned in anyone, lawful, good or evil, she didn’t report it. Reliably she didn’t report students brewing potions in there either, so she isn’t chaotic Neutral. Cedric Diggory leaned Neutral Good more than he leaned Neutral Evil. Like with Mertle, it’s easy to point out where they helped or returned the favor to Harry, but not really as easy to point to where Cedric was neutral towards evil, unlawful, or chaotic actions.

Wouldn't Slughorn be a better True Neutral. He actively secluded himself so as not to choose Good or Evil and he shares sympathies for both sides (has a clear bias for pure bloods yet finds himself impressed by the unicorn "talented muggleborn").

For true neutral I would have put olivander. He is the only “good” character that has shown a level of respect for Voldemort. I always think back to Harry’s first and last encounters with him where he didn’t know how to feel about olivander, yes the dark side tortured him, he isn’t on their side however he never showed alliance to Harry either, only helping cause Harry’s visions gave him information that intimidated him. Olivander only cares for wands and admiration of the power produced by them, good or bad

Snape, in many ways, is a True Neutral who wants to be Neutral Good but is held back by his former descisions and his own bitterness. He literally treads the line between good and evil in a way that has him being both (more good than evil, but both are still present) in a way that can really only be called Neutral because we lack a better term for it. He is a very interesting character, and one of my favs.

I really feel like Narcissa needs her own category. She, in my opinion, would be a “Questionable Neutral” or a “Can someone keep an eye on her - Neutral”😂

Okay, that “Professor Um- *bleep*” got me. That was great.

I think slughorn could fit neutral. He is out for himself. He doesn’t want to support either side, but yet he has supported both sides, giving the horcrux info to Tom riddle, giving the memory to Harry. But almost nothing he does is for the sake of right or wrong, it’s basically how can I survive this current conflict and get back to my comfortable life style. He does not want an active part in ending the conflict, he’s doesn’t want to be perceived to be “on Dumbledor’s side” if staying neutral will keep him alive longer.

true neutral is aberforth in my opinion. He doesn't do anything when it comes to picking a side. He only helps Neville bc room of requirements opens a tunnel there adn he just help to people in need as a neutral does. Also he helps the good guys at the battle of hogwarts bc he grew the like people from hogwarts and he still just want to help. He never picked a side he was just there and mostly the good guys came to him.

I truly believe Draco is the one who is neutral neutral. Very susceptible to outside influence yet truly conflicted by his emotions and his upbringing.

I'd say Aberforth is more neutral/neutral. He's not in most of the story, but he's still someone you'd expect to be more active in the plot, considering he's Albus' brother. Yet he's living his own life on the sides, not helping anyone, letting things happen. At least until the very end when he does help somewhat.

I would like to put Xenophilius Lovegood forward as chaotic neutral. He starts as a chaotic good character, but by the end of the story, he has made decisions to protect himself and his daughter at the cost of giving the bad guys what they want. When push comes to shoves, his own interests come first.

Would have loved to see a full breakdown of literally every character and where they fit. I think there’s some really interesting characters that weren’t discussed

I think Snape is a True Neutral in the end. His actions were motivated by who wronged him and avenging Lily's death. True Neutral that holds grudges till the end. He was mean to Harry because he was James's son, but still worked on Dumbledore's side because Harry was Lily's son

Someone like Ollivander would probably make a good candidate for Neutral Neutral. He technically leans towards good to an extent like Neutrals tend to do, but he doesn't really actively support either side in any direct ways. Aberforth also came to mind. It's also fairly easy to cheat and answer plot-unimportant characters for this role, too. Like, someone like Stan Shunpike is probably Neutral Neutral, but... Really, would you pick him as an example?

I would put Cedric closer to LN or even LG. He's generally a good person, and is all about the rules and fair play. For True Neutral I would put up the centaurs. They literally don't pick sides as part of their culture, they simply watch the planets and stars and see how they influence the ebb and flow of events around them.

Wouldn't Greyback also be Chaotic Evil? Also, in no way is Cedric True Neutral. Neutrality to the plot or the hero is not the same as being a force for balance between good, evil, order and chaos. The only characters I would say exhibited truly True Neutral characteristics in Harry Potter are the centaurs other than Firenze. As for Snape, he is a character who has an alignment shift throughout his arc. He starts off Neutral Good, but gradually shifts to True Neutral and even a little towards Lawful Evil before Lilly's death, only to spend most the rest of the story firmly as Lawful Neutral in the service of Dumbledore's Lawful Good plan.

Hot Take: the True Neutral person should be Draco. Rather than not taking any stand he was FORCED to both help Voldemort AND Harry (at least at the end)

I would say that Slughorn is True Neutral. He is just about himself. Would rather not do anything bad, but then again if he could have he would have gone through the wizarding war as a neutral, but it was only because he could get something out of it and it would be more comfortable that he goes to Hogwarts. He witholds the memory from the good guys when it would have helped them, not because he wanted evil to win but because he didn't want to confront the truth of the matter. He gathers influence for himself, not not for evil gain but so that he can have favours and comforts. He will do whatever is most expedient at the time for himself.

Since they specifically brought it up, no Cedric isn't true neutral, but Snape is. Because Snape is unconcerned with Good/Evil or Law/Chaos. As a child he seems to like Dark Magic not because it's evil, but because it's useful for what he wants. And he hangs around with the fellow future Death Eaters not because he wants to be cruel but because they're the people who treat him well. And then, in then converse, he doesn't join the Order because of a repulsion against the horrible things the Death Eaters are doing, but only because of his specific attachment to Lilly, i.e. selfish, personal reasons. Finally, he's perfectly happy to enforce the rules when it suits him (punishing students from other houses when they break rules) but is perfectly willing to bend or break those rules when it suits him as well (all the things he ignores about Slytherin students).

I think that Snape is the perfect example of chaotic neutral. Even more than Harry. He’s simultaneously the second in command for both good and evil but will do whatever it takes to appeal to both sides.

I feel like Snape is like Gilderoy in that he is mostly just out for himself. I mean, helping Harry is not out of the good of his own conscious conscience but because of his misery at loosing Liliy who was all he cared about in the whole series - and even then he didn't treat her all that well, calling her a mudblood and such. He's pretty much getting back at Voldy for killing his one true love. He doesn't really care who wins or loose. He will have had a place at the table whichever side he chose. He's not even the forgiving type. He treats Harry as though his father's sins were the boy's own. It really doesn't matter to him unless there something in it for him. And, while Lily has been long gone, there was a personal emotional gratification at play here. Had he understood the situation differently, he would put the blame on himself. But he isn't going to do that. But idk, obviously he chose a specific type and stuck with it. So he has to lean on good.

Umbridge is one of the best media showings of lawful evil ever seen

I’d argue that the True Neutral character was Cornelius Fudge. His main concern was keeping the status quo at all costs. He neither helped nor hindered either side in the wizarding war, almost aggressively so. He was also simultaneously “The Law” as the chief executive of the magical government, but also clearly threw away the rules when it suited him. For example, He reacts completely differently to Harry using underage magic in front of muggles in books 3 and 5. He also appears to have close relationships with important figures in the war on both sides. Dumbledore, Kingsley on the good team. Lucius, and Um*BEEP* on the bad. As well as being steadfastly against “criminals” on both sides, Sirius and Bellatrix. As for Snape, I’d say Chaotic Good, at least in the story seen. He is on the side of good, but his motivations are based on some dark emotions like jealousy , anger, revenge, obsession , and grief.

True Neutral I would say Narcissa, she was always in the middle in her family, as Bellatrix was on the evil side and Andromeda on the good side. I can see her being on either side of good and evil, as she only really supports Voldormort for her husband and son's sake, she also protected harry, only because of her Son safety. So she does both evil and good, to really balance it out.

Umbri*** being able to produce a patronus is a brilliant inclusion in the story. It shows that she genuinely thinks she's doing what's best! She's so completely power-mad that she has actually deluded herself to the point where she can feel the joy necessary to conjure a patronus! Of course, that also makes her more vulnerable to dementors than a typical "dark" wizard, but I doubt she ever even noticed, much less saw it as a disadvantage, probably because she saw herself as a basically normal, law-abiding person. Which is, like, completely insane. What a marvelously written character.

Snape is Chaotic Neutral. Everything is does is for his love, hate, and the emotions in between. Both helping Harry and bullying him stems from his emotions of Harry's Parents. He joins Voldemort due to his magical pride but leaves when Lily is in danger. He has no moral hangups with good or evil so long as they benefit him and the ones he considers important. My choice for a true Neutral would be the Prime minister of Magic. (Forgot his name) He messes with Harry and denies Voldemort is back but doesn't want a war to happen or back up Voldemort when he actually see him back.

I don’t know about Cedric. He seems more Lawfully Good than even Hermione (I mean, do we remember the quidditch match in Harry’s 3rd year? The third task when he, technically, makes it to the center of the maze first? That’s a good kid!) I think Slughorn fits True Neutral the best. He is out to save himself, neither WANTING to help the “good” or “bad” side (though he has at one point or another). He isn’t NG, otherwise he would have joined Dumbledore the first time he asked, and he isn’t NB otherwise he would have joined Voldy the second that first deatheater came knocking

Cedric is unequivocally good-aligned. He's not on "Harry's team", per se, but what he does do, he does because it's "the right thing to do". That's textbook good. Harry had a leg up on the first task, and notice that he went to Cedric, but not Fleur or Viktor, because he's got a personal connection with Cedric. Cedric also helped out Harry, in part because he owed him one, but in part, because it was the right thing to do. We don't see if he helped out Fleur or Viktor, and we don't know if they'd already figured it out. The one area where Harry really outshines Cedric on the good front is the second task. That's about it. In the graveyard, Cedric doesn't flee when told to, though he's not much use either. I don't think Cedric would work as a True Neutral character. He leans too far into the Good camp, in my view. Hufflepuff, broadly, is the most Good of the Houses, because of its values of fairness and cooperation. True Neutral characters come in two flavours - characters dedicated to preserving the balance, like the archetypical druid, and characters who don't have a particular inclination toward an alignment, like most people in real life. Griphook, Trelawney, and the Dursleys are good examples of True Neutral. Griphook is self-interested, with no qualms about doing good or bad things, and no real regard for the rules, and no exceptional rebellion against them. Trelawney is mostly a fraud who goes through the motions of teaching a class. She's not really bent on helping or harming anyone, and she has no problem lying to cover for her ineptitude. The Dursleys are a mixed bag for Harry, as well. They're not so good that they'd be kind and loving to Harry, but not so bad that they'd abandon him or torture him. They just kind of treat him as an unwanted guest, with occasional moments of warmth later on from Petunia and Dudley.

I 100% think Sirius is chaotic good because of the fact that he always wants the best for everyone but he is a bit messy with his plans

My first thought for true neutral was Ollivander, mainly because the line "Voldemort did many great things, Teribble, but great" showing that he doesnt rlly side with anyone (obvsly hes still a good person and is on the side of harry, but he acknowledges the "great" things moldevort has done, whereas any "good neutral" character would instantly dismiss and severely ridicule those actions)

i just got unnecessarily protective of Cedric when you called him a true neutral 😂 i think he’s probably more of a neutral good because he definitely leans good.

I have had a really hard time understanding moral alignments. This helped me so much. I guess having things explained in Harry Potter terms really helped.

The best beginning in the world of SuperCarlinBrothers !!!! . I'm so glad you guys made this video

When Voldemort gets up in the morning, he puts on his socks like most people, then says, "These socks are amazing!" Only then does he go on to think of evil things to do.

I see Dumbledore as a chaotic good character. Like his “big plan” involves putting Harry in a lot of dangerous predicaments for “the greater good” and in order of the Phoenix he legit escaped being captured by Umbr*ge and fudge causing chaos in the school as a result.

Such a good idea for a topic, thank you for the video I found it really interesting!

@supercarlinbrothers, I just gotta tell you that while I very much enjoy your videos, I hate sponsor adds. So I very much appreciate your sponsor timer bar on your videos :D

Tbh, I think Gryffindors and Slytherins are typically more chaotic, Hufflepuffs are generally more neutral, and Ravenclaws are typically more lawful, just based on the characteristics of each house.

So, Cedric doesn't support Harry in his fight against Voldemort... because he never gets a chance to! He gets killed in the first five seconds! I don't think it's fair to use that as evidence for his being neutral. Also, I think Lockhart is probably more true neutral than chaotic neutral. Sure, his end results tend towards chaotic, but that's just from incompetence rather than alignment. The best example of a chaotic neutral character is Peeves. He doesn't care what's going on from a good/evil standpoint; he just cares that it's chaotic. Edit: I also saw a comment about centaurs being true neutral. I agree, and I think they're probably the best ones to put in there. Except Firenze. Firenze is neutral good. Most of the centaurs have the same thing of siding with Harry in the end, but overall there's no better example for true neutral.

Really loved this explaination!

"professor um(beep)" is the best name ever

The way he was describing Neutral Neutral immediately made me think of Snape. He supported Harry only because he cared about Lily, not because it was right. He supported Voldemort only because he thought he was supposed to, not because he believed in Voldemort's cause. He was out for himself, within what was expected of him. True Neutral all the way.

I don't necessarily disagree with Cedric being Neutral Neutral, but I think that Horace Slughorn would've been a better example

i love your harry potter videos please gimme more of those big serieses

Not sure if intentional with the "stepped on a bee" comment.. but i smiled... That Heard girl xD!

Taking everything into account, at the moment of his death, I believe Snape is a True Neutral. I am going to make a correction first before I explain though: Yes, True Neutral's can be defined as their lack of moral commitment to either side, as a player and DM of Dungeons and Dragons, they can also very much be defined by their moral commitment to neutrality- staying out of any and all conflcit, a neutral presence. (See Switzerland for a geographical TN.) Snape obviously isn't committed to not committing to a side, because he crosses back and forth more often than a chicken over a road, but the defining factor for me at least, is his motivation. He was driven by a love for Lily at the base of it, and though that could end up placing him on the side of good, it's the fact that _he_ wanted to be the one to give and return Lily's affections, Snape wanted it to be him, and _only_ him. But this is just my opinion, he's possibly the most complex character in the entire series so a single person on the internet isn't going to represent an entire fanbase. Honestly, I think Aberforth works well as a True Neutral character, if he isn't NG.

Not gunna lie, I thought Narcissa and Draco were going to be classed as the true neutral characters. They support Voldemort, yes, but I don't think they really seemed to be too invested with either side other than for the sake of appearances. They seem to me to be on the side of their own safety and peace keeping with their own family and ancestry more than anything else.

I’m watching this after the Jd vs Ah trial and your whole stepped on a bee comment cracked me up lol 😂

I love that hidden joke (or was it meant as joke) in Professor Umbridge first mention, where you used "Um(beeb)", and "Um" is the phase she loves to interrupt people with.

I think Snape would be a true neutral. His motivations are only ever for himself (not Harry or Voldemort), and while he mostly follows the rules, he still has no problem breaking them when necessary.

I wouldn't do Cedric that dirty, Aragog is more of a true neutral. He only has loyalty to Hagrid, and that loyalty is pretty limited. Outside of that I think a lot of side characters fit the true neutral description, as a lot of students don't support Voldemort, but won't stand against him either. They read the room and choose the path that inconveniences them the least. In that vein Wormtail almost fits as true neutral, he bet on Voldemort because he saw Voldemort was extremely powerful and made the choice that he thought would best keep himself safe. He sold out his friends for his own self interest, but his loyalty to Voldemort is very much linked to fear and limited choices. He doesn't serve the dark lord out of support for his ideals, devotion, or even liking Voldemort. Everything Wormtail does is for Wormtail. Unfortunately for Wormtail, Wormtail made a real hash of things and really backed himself into a corner

13:59 ms. norris: Why hooman yelling? This is a fun ride.

I think Snape is the ultimate active True Neutral. He does what he must to preserve balance irrespective of the cost.

Oh. My. God. Hes wearing a BLANK t-shirt and jeans. This is a moment that will change the course of history.

I feel like Slughorn is the neutral neutral. Like I was so certain he was about to say Slughorn. He's far more neutral than Cedric IMO.

The Excitement around Professor Mcgonagall's Scene is always Extremely relateable, Possibly my Top 5 if not #1 scene in all the movies.

The old sock advertisements would have been perfect for the part right afyer explaining that Voldemort doesn't wear socks. Also, I love the clip where McGonagall tells Filch the students are supposed to be out of bed

the fact that voldemort doesn’t wear socks or shoes makes him a chaotic evil

Personally I think I might put Viktor Krum in True Neutral. He doesn't really support either Harry or Voldemort. He doesn't really do anything evil (except while under the Imperius curse, which obviously isn't him doing it) nor does he really do things for good. And I don't think he is chaotic or lawful.

I was a DM back in the day. Wrote my own modules. Trying to gauge how the players would handle something, not make it too hard for them, not make it too easy, make sure they had what they needed to accomplish the goal, include them all to work as a team, or not, make it exciting for all, the roll of dice making it chaotic still random.( you never want to be too controlling just a guide) Thats tough. My masterpiece I called; "The caverns of safe keeping." Including; Gharls "Bad" cavern. Took them mos to get through it. Had a blast. OK more than one😉 I still have all the orig 1st ed books.

Very good video. Thanks!

0:47 *"Professor Um[beep]"* Ok, ngl, didn't see that one coming.

I strongly disagree personally with cedric being true neutral. That argument really only holds up in the specifics of the conflict between harry and voldy. If you look at Cedric as a character, he does show that he adheres to a code, even to his own detriment (lawful), that code essentially being the defining traits of hufflepuff house. Kindness, Integrity, Compassion. Which are all traits that very clearly would qualify him as good. In short, if im rolling up a cedric diggory character sheet, he's 100% lawful good. For a genuinely true neutral character... The Grey Lady. Until Harry persuades her, she keeps the whole "I told him where moms diadem is" to herself despite knowing that it would help defeat him. Her reasoning seems to be 'Why bother, itll sort itself out eventually. Im dead why should i get involved.' But shes not so set in that mindset that she was unwilling to break her silence. She literally helped both sides. She was willing to just watch everything play out without getting involved further. But she broke her decades long silence when asked. All of which show that shes not good or evil, but also lawful enough to stick to her word, and chaotic enough to break that promise when the time came. Neutral.

I think I’d place Snape in Chaotic Neutral. He’s fighting for both sides which places him in Neutral, and (making an exception for The Deathly Hallows) will usually exploit the rules to get him and his house more points.

Don’t know why, but supercarlin brothers stopped appearing in my recommended feed and it came back. Yay! More HP stuff!

True Neutral- The Elder Wand, in every way. Snape, I'd say TN. Doesn't particularly care about following the rules or going against them, his chief concern is the safety of Lily... And even that is for selfish reasons. He doesn't really care about the good or evil, just himself.

What about Draco? For some reason I’d put him neutral too. Not completely committed to either side, just trying to have him and his family survive. Not actually evil because he didn’t have the heart to kill Dumbledore but also didn’t fight in the battle against Voldemort.

McGonagall: I’ve always wanted to use that spell. J in his head: I’ve always wanted to use that spell

Umbridge is so unstable 🤣 that giggle

You really did chaotic good dirty with that definition and character classing. Chaotic good characters tend to value personal freedom highly and frown upon the rules when they get in the way of that. They do still want the best for others as well though unlike the other 2 chaotic alignments and will do their best to act for the greater good. Hagrid is the most chaotic good character in HP imo.

Snape: Definitely lawful. All about discipline, including self-discipline and rules. On the Good-Evil axis, I'll call him neutral, because he cherishes the dark side but has enough love to case a Patronus based on the person he loves. There is actually a case to be made that Snape is True Neutral (that is, like a druid) because he seems to favor Good, Evil, Law, and Chaos whichever seems shortest in supply at the time. I don't think he perceives himself as seeking balance, but his decisions seem to follow that metric. Another such "unintentional true neutral" may be Anakin Skywalker/Darth Vader. When Jedi rule the galaxy, he slays Jedi. When Sith rule the galaxy, he slays Palpatine/Sidious. As far as a neutral/neutral, Mundungus Fletcher seems a good candidate.

In FB I think Newt is a classic Neutral Neutral. He refuses to pick a side but errs towards good. I think you guys should do another 9 moral alignments video about the FB characters (so far).

Love this. Yeah I was wondering snapr would be. Maybe make a new grid idk where I would put him

Another thing to consider, especially in Snape's case, is that a person's alignment will shift over the course of their life.

I think Slughorn is the best example of a true neutral. His only interest is toward himself. Snape is difficult. His hatred of Harry stems from his hurt over Lily, and hurting those who hurt you is part of a neutral character. His cruelty reflects the cruelty shown to him as a child. At the same time, if a student were hurt, I can't imagine Snape ignoring them, even if it were Harry, Ron, or Hermione. Snape's only true allegiance is to his memory of Lily, first motivated by her rejection, then by his part in her death. He isn't necessarily aligned to Voldemort or Dumbledore, and I believe this makes him a Neutral character. Honestly, I go back and forth on which Neutral alignment he is.

it's difficult sometimes to not write the character out of character. i think that sentence makes sense.

I think that luna would be chaotic good as she is constantly going out of society while supporting harry

When it came to true neutral, I was screaming out Ollivander. I was slightly disappointed that it wasn't him, but more disappointed that you said Cedric. Regarding Snape, it's hard to decide between lawful neutral and true neutral

I personally would place Snape in true neutral because as you said, he serves both sides, so you can't say good or evil there, he doesn't like the protagonist, or the antagonist, he isn't concerned with rules to the point where he is lawful, he isn't very chaotic, he's more orderly and refined, and he does tip over to the good side only for his own personal reasons (those being his love for Lily and MAYBE his respect for Dumbledore)

LOL at bleeping out Umbridge

I have always stuck myself into the chaotic good category! (Aka. The aggressively friendly/nice!)

I think we can all agree that Professor Um*bleep* is how she should be addressed from now on

Cedric I would classify as Lawful Good, he was as decent, forthright, and fair-spirited as they come. A Hufflepuff's Hufflepuff. Snape is, in my estimation, Neutral Evil. He is motivated solely by his own self-interest. No other character in the series, not even Harry (who is written as a sort of mirror image) so closely resembles Voldemort. The difference, the only substantive difference, between them is Snape's obsession with Lily, a "love" that Voldemort was intrinsically unable to experience. Both Snape and, to slightly lesser extent Dumbledore, had the capacity to be Voldemort level BBEGs. Dumbledore's youthful love for Grindelwald and Snape's love/obsession for Lily are what leads them onto a different (although perhaps no more laudatory) path than young Mr. Riddle.

"Dobby never meant to kill. He only meant to maim, or seriously injure."

I believe there are two slightly different alignments in the center that are treated as neutral but are slightly different. True Neutral and Natural Neutral. In the monster manuals just about any animal has the default alignment of neutral but don't have any greater soul or spirit to make that decision on a conscious level. They just do what their nature directs them to do.

I was hoping to see a larger discussion that would include characters like Mundungus Fletcher, Griphook and Mad-Eye Moody but a good video and a very interesting topic. You should have a multi-part series on this.

Gonna have to disagree about Cedric. He’s definitely good. If he wasn’t killed, he would have joined Harry in the fight against Voldemort, no question. A more fitting true Neutral would be one of the Centaurs. Their whole philosophy is around staying out of the conflicts because the world ebbs and flows and they are just a part of it. Otherwise, I love this topic :) wish you would have categorized more of the characters!

I agree with the list and Snape could likely be placed in the true neutral slot as well.