Why was Magnus Carlsen Surprised | Maghsoodloo vs Magnus | World Rapid 2023 

MAGNUS ARRIVES ON TIME!!????????????

😂😂​@@prosartmarketing7330

yeah but Magnus was pissed anyways :)

@@Alexander-dt2eqhe was a good sport about it

So the one who wins is still Magnus? I ask because I'm just learning chess

@@euaggelionmartinusspyes cos it was a false claim

@@Alexander-dt2eqhe wasn’t, he said himself that it was a fair attempt on an interview he gave afterwards

🤣🤣🤣

So accurate lol

I’ve always wondered why he walks so fast. Maybe because he’s late for his matches?

its the tism 😆 i walk the same

😂😂😂😂

interesting 🧐

Parham doing a magnus, magnus once did it against Pragg in the world cup lmao

wtf. Why did he do that???

20:45. Misclick) l lost

one last attempt I guess 😆 (I'm being sarcastic before someone stress out, I know it was an accident)

exactly, you can't blame Parham as after Kb7, the knight will be captured, that was his last option to get a draw in a losing position.

​@@asdfasdf-xf9veyou can blame him, he tried to cheat

@@arbo3495 It's not cheating to check with the arbiter

@@thijmen6451 he knew it wasn't 50 moves, otherwise he would have asked for the arbiter before being stuck with a lost knight. He tried it anyway and it's not a big deal, Magnus said he did it too. But you can see that he was embarrassed of himself afterwards for trying it.

​@@arbo3495 He played it out until the very last move to get as close as possible to, and possibly cross 50 moves. There is no way for him to know how many moves they are on so it's better to be safe than sorry and check with the arbiter. It's very silly to accuse someone who is simply applying the rules of cheating the way you did.

😂😂

🤣🤣🤣

Thanks for the warning

RIP everybody

He loses

Parham was hoping for 50 moves 🤔😆🤞 last ditch effort since he trapped his knight

@@barnabasastrofengia5345 no, his last ditch effort was switching the kings to light squares after the game ended (19:30) to claim the point, almost worked, live transmission switched the score for a moment 😆

​@@lucasmatsuoca yeah, i saw it too, crazy

Explain the 50 move draw rule please?

being down points and trying to play for a win against Magnus is crazy

@@lezty the rule is if there's no capture and no pawn move in 50 then he gets a draw. After Kb7, the knight has nowhere to go so it will be captured and magnus wins easily, that was his last option to get a draw in a losing position.

​@@asdfasdf-xf9ve You misunderstood him, he seems to say that Parham could draw it, instead he tried to play for the win and lose.

Fue tablas y reclamó repetición de posición en el tablero 3 veces

⁠@@carloszevallos3581parhan perdió el resigno por perder el caballo él incluso dice esto a giri en 20:45 y que la pantalla está mal

FIDE rules say that if you have 5 or less minutes on the clock you dont have to write down the moves.

You're telling me the literal thing they press every time they make a move couldn't be designed to keep track of the Number of moves? So dumb

@@lezty its not only number of moves, there is also 3-fold repetition which draws . If you dont have exact moves written on paper ( or in computer log like they do now using DGT boards) how you are going to claim 3-fold repetition ? People played blitz and rapid before DGT was invented... Kasparov stalemates himself in blitz world championships 1988 . Usual old fashions clocks ... ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-vtTkfmaiI4I.htmlsi=lmavR1f_ZzRWo8Vr 3-fold or 50 move draw would be much harder to determine without scoresheet

Tal in the world blitz that he won has his games digitized along with everyone else, so they had digital boards back then

High IQ? More like only thing to do at that point...

I am far beyond 2k elo and to check the number of moves was a no-brainer.

@@Pullapelleno ones say far beyond 2k or people say they exatly rating or they are 2050 and is caping with such statement lmao

@@flacsomtodosclas2165 or then they don’t want to be identified by their elo, genious.

@@Pullapelle no one can be identified by their elo unless you are IM or above

Both mine go left

@@dooflydetailguuy4349 same

@@dooflydetailguuy4349same- like in standard diagrams

vidit spooked the shit out of me

yeah exactly

This is not classical

yes, why he moved horse there??

@@PrayogiCristian nothing to do with classical lmao. skill issue

@@jt895 clown, try play it with few seconds left

Magnus

Or even should have continued to play defense like he was doing. There really wasn't any entry for the white king. But overall admirable play by Parham, didn't exchange a single piece or pawn unless he was absolutely forced to do so. Mostly people just try to exchange everything versus Magnus.

😂

Lol 😂

50 move rule no is automatically if u check the Rules in FIDE manual, only 75 is automatically

a move counter on the clock wouldn't help ... it's 50 moves since the last capture or pawn move, not 50 moves total

If 50 moves are played without any pawn move or any capture, it is possible to claim a draw.

@@Redeiperdentibut yeah but it ain't 50 move

Originally there was no such rule, and frankly the rule is slightly dubious in how it helps the chess game itself. It was brought in because, from a tournament structure perspective, you don't want really want games that could potentially go on for many more than 150 moves, and absolutely don't want potential games where both players are just trying to wait for the opponent to blunder mentally first in drawn positions just because they refuse to agree to a draw. The few games that have gone over 200 moves in these settings, especially if it started in the afternoon, tend to go on way too long (heavily impacting the next day of playing for both players) and be incredibly dull to watch. So, the theory goes, if neither side makes a single capture or pawn move for 50 moves straight, then there must not be any advantage to convert (as a good player would have made such progress substantially within 50 moves) and the game is drawn. Of course, things are rarely that theoretical. It is possible to make a positional mistake that doesn't lose material but still loses the game, but if you are close to the 50 move rule the game is still maybe drawn. Or you could be objectively winning and simply be having trouble with a difficult pattern that you will eventually get (a few tournaments back Super GrandMaster Nepo found himself in a Queen vs Rook situation, which is winning for the Queen but with a very tricky pattern, which Nepo seemingly couldn't precisely recall. But part of the stress that made Nepo fail to win (via 50 move rule draw) was that it is a very long pattern even when correct and 50 moves was looming over him. Or you could simply argue that chess "should" be about mental stamina, and if you think you have a slight advantage you should be able to try and grind out a win, and not stopped because you are using too many moves to do so. At the end of the day it has many flaws and can be situationally positive but is really designed to restrict statistical outliers that could interfere with tournament priorities, at the cost of sometimes drawing winning games.

@@rowanmales3430bruh this rules was made so people wouldnt keep playing in an dead draw position for hours just to try stalling the opponent clock saying it dosent help is absurd because in a general level of chess there is a lot of toxic kids who would try that.

@@flacsomtodosclas2165 ...And that is a problem? If it is a dead drawn position, but someone wants to play on and hope for a blunder, why should that not be allowed? It is only a "drawn position" with perfect play after all, and humans are not perfect. You also risk being the one to blunder instead. Also, there is a natural end based on 3-Fold Repetition draw which you are ignoring which stops the exact same position being played endlessly. So long as you can keep posing NEW positions to your opponent, your opponent should be required to choose how to defend that position. Seems pretty obviously correct to me.

Both Iranian, so both have similar accents

@@sneakyvictorsneakyvictor7658 Not quite. They are from regions in Iran that are very close, and more importantly they are long-term friends and probably had the same English tutor. That's why. Any other two random Iranians would be very distinguishable.

Thank god someone else said this… I always felt this and was shocked when I heard their voices

They still have an Iranian Accent ​@@miladini1

he isn't ... did you watch the whole video? with the sound on?

It is less interesting if you know why.

@@sailor-rick does it have to do with the fact its a smart board? making sure pieces register correctly?

@@magurio1877 no

Nxf5, Ke4, Nh6, Rd2+, and the king is cut off from the pawns

i think white didn't take because black knight would be trapped after: Nxf5 - Ke4 Nh6 - Rh7 Ng8 - Kf5 g4+ - hxg4 that combination leaves black in a winning position because white's knight would be trapped

​@@DeWElGaMeRI think Nxf5 Ke4 Nh6 Rg7 traps the knight on the spot Then the king comes in via e5-f6-g6

Nah he just got greedy and wanted to grab a pawn instead of parking the Knight in safe square. Turned out Magnus was sharp enough to punish him.

No. He forgot to put the knight back to G5 i think. He knew it was a draw. But playing magnus is Just to much pressure

Just watch when he talks to Giri

@@WhiteSharkconcac no stupid, that's not what happened

incoming Hikaru vid.

the toilet champion? 😁

he's the opposite of vanish

One of the greatest mysteries of the universe. Cosmologists are trying to figure it out

the knight was getting trapped no matter what or allowing king infiltration, the blunder happened 6 or 7 moves before the knight getting "officially" trapped

No you don't think, you look at the engine

Good one

*Even if you didn't look at the cheat engine, it's harder to play moves when on the clock, running out of time and under pressure. Otherwise, Magnus is known for getting the best move, 100% correct moves all the time.* *Something you and I will never be able to do in our life time.*

@@radicalrick9587 I am not criticising Magnus. I am a big fan of him. And I did not look at the engine. I just paused and analysed at the critical juncture when I saw the evaluation bar jump back to almost equal from a winning position. Which meant that he missed a tactic. I am just bringing out the better move for the other viewers of the channel. If you can stop judging me, you will see that I was not looking down at Magnus but instead inviting a discussion about the correct move for fellow chess lovers.

I saw it too and was very confused if it actually works, but now if you have seen it too, it apparently is right tho At least once in our lives we found a better move than Magnus... 🤣

because the FIDE said 50 rules needs to be claim but 75 is automatically

Белые просто ходят конем и f1 невозможен.

if he wouldve taken the pawn on f5 it's lost for him, his knight will get trap, he had only d6 for his knight to return in the game but magnus blocked it with the rook xd he tried thru e8 to go back in the game but as you saw didn't work

50 moves

you are wrong in both statements, it's the 50 moves rule, and taking the pawn would still be losing as you can see by the engine bar evaluation on the right. He did not take the pawn cause he understood it and instead tried to get some more moves in to approach 50 without pawn moves and captures

blundering isn't intentional; duh

That reminds me of my games, i have nothing to lose because it's casual playing, and when theres repetitions, dead draw, i just throw haha i just would rather lose than draw But yeah, he shouldnt have done it, it's hard to think the Knight can get trapped tbh

@@juliocadavid6640 the knight could never have got trapped if he kept it g5

three fold must be claimed exactly at the moment you repeated three times, you cant claim later, and even so, I'm pretty sure it didn't happen, Magnus was keeping track of the squares he was using with the rook

For more clearness. I like both chess players. I’m only make some jokes … 🎉

Lol. Dude hates M

can't happen, that was its last move before being captured

say what?!...blind folded against 10 players!...I and bad playing sighted against 1 player...unbelievable