"Wir sind des Geyers schwarzer Haufen" (We are Geyer's Black Horde)- German Folk Song (Rare Version) 

@@Nordbon1523 got it, thanks!

@Koning Günter II 'n wapenbroer yes, the rainbow flag

@Koning Günter II 'n wapenbroer the rainbow was a christian symbol before being taken by the sodomites

It was used by Münzer who was an anti monarchist Protestant who even got atacked by Martin Luther

That flag isn’t from Florian Geyer tho, that was the “Light” host (hence the rainbow and white background) It was commanded by that one German guy that was burned after losing the war, Florian’s host was the “Dark” host, he used the Bundschuh with black background, plain black flag, or Wolfsangel (wolf hook) with black background, although many say that the last one is not true

It does mean "Lord, have mercy", but in this context, no

​@@cortexradio yes it actually means god have mercy in that context are you german?

@@cortexradio i assume it is in the song, because they start a violent revolution, which also includes killing people. So i guess they are sort of saying: "God forgive me for what i am about to do"

@@comrademax5302you are right that’s the meaning of Kyrie eleison or Kyrieleis

@@tavish4699 in german Kyrieleis had different meaning, sorry for mistake

Just learned about the man today, and by God, that is one glorious man. Also, he's got an epic name

@@ikmalkamal5830 yes he was glorious and epic

Born to Nobility: Sides with Peasants: Kills Nobility: Dies a Martyr: Based Florián Geyer

@@Theredcarolinian I know right

William of Nassau also sided with the people against his monarch (i understand that they weren't peasant but still) i guess the new religious movement really did reach the hearts of the people who embraced it

Its something Ive decided to stop doing, unfortunately

@@cortexradio You could also upload 2 versions of songs, only if an echo fits ofcourse

​@@cortexradiohow do you make reverb songs? Pls?

Hello Mannerheim ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-3AbZk5Re0Zk.htmlsi=4dbbWhmuN0ZTs6BU

Jep, talonpojat nouskoon!

Same here Kamerad! Where from?

maybe because it is german? Edit: I just understood what you mean, but still its quite easy to hear what they are saying

@@Adamm17004 Eh. What I meant what state hes from. Like me, I’m a Bavarian.

@@KMZX_700 NRW

Uhm...ja bist ja deutsch, wär schon traurig wenn du kein Hochdeutsch verstehen würdest

Perhaps the HRE and the smaller German states within it would bring about change? As in more liberalism and workers rights in general, since the peasants weren't against the HRE, they were simply against the corruption and injustice going on inside of it. But the HRE would remain haha

Actually peasants were fighting to working under directly Emperor not some feudals or church

@@Nechay. being under emperor means more autonomy Case point: Switzerland

it may have been possible if the radical hussites succeeded, which they were very close in doing so. If the hussites had won and secured Bohemia under hussite control, then maybe, in the century leading up to the great peasants rebellion, more seeds of autonomy and anti nobility could’ve been planted throughout central europe. If this had occurred, the peasants rebellion could’ve been significantly larger and they could’ve had military assistance from hussite bohemia, and possibly the polish as well, if the hussites were to succeed there as well.

@@cortexradioell, the rebelling peasants quite literally burned every monastery/church/religious institution they came across and executed nobles by the thousands in Weinsberg and other places. I dont think it would be too difficult for them to win, they outnumbered the enemy by far, and Florián Geyer’s heavy knights were very powerful, perhaps if they were lead by a skillful commander who could put in practice some sort of early guerrilla warfare they could have won. Anyways they were incredibly based and I hope some day the working class can be free from the nobles, capitalists and church. N U L L A C R U X , N U L L A C O R O N A .

G'Morning thank you ✋❤

They go back a lot further than that. The one used today was actually stolen directly from a "hippie" group that has been large & active in the United States since the very early 70s. Around '79 members of the community that is more well known for using it now went to one of their gatherings and decided they would just use it for themselves without even trying to change it. Needless to say it's been a point of contention ever since. The group they stole it from isn't in the public eye nearly as much, but it is roughly the same size (arguably it was much larger for a long time). The original group still has gatherings (called Rainbow Gatherings) that are open to everyone if you want to look up what I'm talking about. They'll go build a village in our national forests for a month then tear it down and clean it all up. At it's core I guess you could say it's an experiment in living without leaders or money.

Oh, they have an international presence too, but it's considerably different in many ways.

Haha,degenerate

The great gay revolution of 1423

​@@waripolo3813Bruh.

There actually was one a few hours after this was uploaded, a different version though 💀

zamn 💀

the lands would likely be divided into free communes or reconquered after the war is over as the peasants would no longer fight under one banner

​@chemuzzefff9632 Medieval anarchism?

@@Based_Gigachad_001 that sounds like a sick metal band also yes, anarchism pretty much

@@asspotter If so why did communists and national socialists use Florian Geyer for propaganda purposes?

It means just that, but it is said not in a religious manner rather a Hurra/battle cry.

Well yes, but in this context not really. It's more of a battle cry like @Lorelei said

"Geyers schwarzer Haufen" is anti-church but it's not anti-religious or atheist. It makes references to the social-revolutionary character of early Christianity most notably when it mentions that after genesis and the creation of Adam and Eve there were in fact no noblemen.

Yes it does The creater doesnt know what hes talking svout

The meaning of "kyrieleis" in this song kinda is "nowhere". Like "where was the nobleman then? Nowhere". Just my opinion.

There is a full version of this audio on RU-vid : ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ul0GWAVGLYs.html

Just google "German Peasants War"... its a rebellion that happened in the HRE sometime after Martin Luther's reformation.

@@cortexradioOk thanks

Dr Ludwig's archive, theres a lot of rare recordings of German songs in there. You can find the link in his channel :)

@@cortexradioThanks

Rainbow means back then: 🌈💪🍷🗿

And communists tried to make this song seem socialist

Well this song was originally made for floren geyer, a German knight Wich armed 200 peasants and named his army "the black bunch" during the German farmer war in the 1500's (forgot what exact year) Wich is basically a revolution but in ww2 the fascist used this for an SS division

"Lord have mercy", in Greek

It’s a German trying to pronounce Kyrie Eleison

Not a Nazi song

@@peg2legs90its a reference to a tno vid

Much older, around the protestant reformation

@@cortexradio Vielen Dank!

Says it right there in the pinned comment: "The flag used here is the flag which was used by the peasants during the uprising. A flag featuring a "Bundschuh" (a medieval boot) was also another flag used by them."

The rainbow was/is a symbol of the covenant between God and humans. "It shows a rainbow, intended to refer to the covenant God made between Noah and Himself (Genesis 9:1-17). Below the rainbow, there is a line of Latin text saying "verbum domini maneat in etternum" (="verbvm Domini maneat in aeternvm"), which means "The word of the LORD stays eternally", signaling the eternal validity of the covenant God made between Noah and Himself. Underneath the line in Latin, there are two lines of German text saying "die ist das zeichen des ewigen bundes gotes" (="die ist das Zeichen des ewigen Bundes Gottes"), which means "It is the sign of the eternal covenant of God", describing the meaning of the rainbow."

@@kmsprinzeugen1304 that's a very detailed explanation, thank you! :)

I was waiting for at least one lutheran comment. Nowadays all the “Christians” are hateful Catholics.

Greetings from Finland btw

@@moisuomihow’s nato?

@@judeknowles2319 Very comfortable.

@@moisuomi nice

N U L L A C R U X , N U L L A C O R O N A .

This is the full version

How,the normal map with the states weren't enough???

Any map that has hre is cursed enough

Germans were never fully straight, were they?

That somg has to be post 1525

Macht aber im Kontext dieses Liedes 0 Sinn. Der Klerus hatte damals in großen Bereichen des HRR das Gewaltmonopol und die politische Macht. Der Konflikt hier ist eher Arbeiter vs. Klerus/Adel.

​@@Bartnuschler I wholeheartedly disagree. What you're basically saying is that what we're experiencing today is not completely the same as the contextual history in which the song was made, to which my response is; it doesn't have to be the same, and here's why; yes, it was AT THAT TIME the clergy who were tyrants and hiding behind the guise of the church to exercise outright tyranny on the people, but TODAY it is Islam that is, without any doubt the tyrannical forces against all cultures in which they come into contact with by way of refugee status. France, Netherlands, Kurdistan, India, the US, the UK, Iran, and perhaps Germany as well; we have, and still are, experiencing the tyrannical forces of a religion that tells it's followers that they are justified for taking the life of our own countryman if they protest by burning a book, or if they even so much as dare to draw a cartoon character, or if they even criticize Muhammad; their lives are to be extinguished for something as petty as a cartoon? God forbid! Maybe you will accept this in today's Germany, but, without hesitation, and with complete determination, I refuse to stand by and allow this to take place in today's United States of America. As the song explicitly states: "Und Wollen mit Tyrannen raufen!" And today's tyrants hiding behind the guise of religion is indeed Islam. So yes; it makes COMPLETE sense. The idea that you need it to be perfectly the same historically, THAT in itself makes no sense at all. As if tyranny is always the same? No, it isn't. It rears it's head in many ways, and today, it's Islam.

@@IchigoIchigo3 yeah but Islam doesnt have the same political power the celegy had.

@@Bartnuschler You're going back to what your first response was to say that it's not exactly the same. To which I responded above, but I'll say again; it doesn't have to be perfectly the same for tyrants to be identified as tyrannical. People are dying at the hands of those who say that their religion says they're justified to take the lives of anyone who does not agree with Islam. That's tyrannical. If it wasn't tyrannical then why are the Iranian women who choose not to wear hijab and protest against the Islamic Republic Regime of Iran, being given two options? One option is that they die by the "morality police" of the Iranian government, and the second option is that instead of being killed they can have one of their eyes gouged out. I know this and have seen this myself, as I protest with the Iranians here in the US, and there are women who are missing their eyes. You don't think this is tyrannical of the government because it isn't exactly the same as the history of this song? You're alienated from understanding if that's really what you think. I can go on about Islam and it's history working it's tyranny through government to further substantiate why Islam is indeed tyranny, but this is further revelation that there is much you don't know. Tyranny doesn't cease to be tyranny because it doesn't perfectly match a song. I can share with you more of Islamic tyranny if you'd actually want to know.

@@IchigoIchigo3 Yeah in countries where said clergy holds the power you could say that ofc.

The DDR government referred to the peasants war as ''the early bourgeois revolution in Germany'' and they made it the subject of one of the world's largest paintings. I'd love to see it one day.

Kinda

also the music ^^

No 🤢🤢🤢🤢

@@Domadimin yes

@@goofymoofy. you mean you hate or like?

@@Domadimin why would I hate rainbows 🌈?

does it really look like i sang the thing

​@@cortexradio I was making a bit of a joke, because this exact version has a few verses that are missing from your video. Here, this is another video with the exact same version of the song, but with the verses intact. Wasn't sure if it was intentional, just took notice of it. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-zmHPizljWu8.htmlsi=sbv2jca7fLgbfAgL

@hewhoplugwalks ah I see, thanks. Unlikely that I'll be doing a remake since this video did pretty well but I'll try :)

@@cortexradio No remake necessary, the video is great as it is!

Also, how did he make the reverb effect?

This Flag is and Never will be a Lgbtq flag

WE SHALL BE FREE WE SHALL NOT BE UNDER THE BOOT WE HAVE NO COMPASSION FOR YOU AND WE ASL NO COMPASSION FROM YOU WHEN OUR TIME COMES WE WILL NOT USE FALSE "SCIENTIFIC" "EVIDENCE" OR RELIGION OR RHETORIC OF PEDOPHILIA USED BY THE LITERAL NAZIS WHEN OUR TIME COMES THERE WILL BE NO EXCUSE FOR THE TERROR OUR FIGHT WILL BE ONE OF PURE VILE UNADULTERATED UNBRIDLED REVENGE

The rainbow was/is a symbol of the covenant between God and humans. "It shows a rainbow, intended to refer to the covenant God made between Noah and Himself (Genesis 9:1-17). Below the rainbow, there is a line of Latin text saying "verbum domini maneat in etternum" (="verbvm Domini maneat in aeternvm"), which means "The word of the LORD stays eternally", signaling the eternal validity of the covenant God made between Noah and Himself. Underneath the line in Latin, there are two lines of German text saying "die ist das zeichen des ewigen bundes gotes" (="die ist das Zeichen des ewigen Bundes Gottes"), which means "It is the sign of the eternal covenant of God", describing the meaning of the rainbow."

Take back the rainbow

The lyricist did become a Nazi but he was not a Nazi when he wrote this song. This song was also used by the DDR so not really a Nazi song

@@cortexradio i agree with that, but AFAIK the GDR also didn't use the lyrics, and ernst busch sung this but AFAIK long before the lyricist was an active nazi

The original context is a completey different one

​​​@@oracudathe GDR didn't sing it, but socialist Hungaria did (look up "Geyer Flórián dala")

​@@MDzaki-uk2ll it was still in DDR songbooks I think, but yeah

@BarrettLeeu I know. The year is 1919. Yes, I don't really respect Germany personally, because she fought with the Russian Empire, and I am Russian. But on the other hand, it was an absolutely adequate state - without LGBT people, perverts. It was strong, confident, patriotic, with freikorps. It even hurts to look at Germany now. Sometimes there are different situations in Russia, too, but at least not at the state level

@@MelOnist_Russland Причем тут лгбт? комментарии читай, это один из оффициальных флагов восстания, а радуга - символ между богом и людьми

Made in 1919 or 20 I think. It was about the Peasant Uprising of the 1600s. It was used by the Nazis for the Florian Geyer Division of the SS, but also used by the DDR later. Theres also a Hungarian version of the same named after Florian Geyer

It's somehow a revolutionary song imo, but yeah, it's about the uprising as Cortex said.

@@cortexradiothe peasants war was to be exact from 1524-1525 and the lyrics were made during that time and brought to music around 1919

Hitler was only using historical characters, like Florian Geyer, to make himself and the Nazis appear heroic in the public eye. In the US we call this "stealing someone else's thunder". He did this quite a lot in order to win the hearts of the German public, and propaganda really had an huge effect on keeping it this way. There are still German WWII survivors whose conscience continues to still feel the affects of Goebbels propaganda machine and think themselves "heroes" in the right. This goes to show what lasting affects propaganda can have on people. Anyways, Florian Geyer himself was fighting against real tyrants of his day that abused their power. So as others have pointed out, this is not a "Nazi song".

Firstly, the rainbow isnt related to pride in any way Secondly, this happened during the 1520s and not the 1700s 🗿

@@cortexradio sorry im late but i know 🗿

Yeah with a big pyre

This isn't gay pride T H I S I S G A Y W R A T H

*L month. Also read the pinned comment.

@@GlobalState2800 they can't read in the first place

The whole German populous started crying when you said this

Now I'm waiting for my 5 dollars@@corfile3869

Please read the pinned comment

Because it's a rainbow doesn't mean it represent the LGBT community, moreover we talk about a 1500's flag