@@georgegeorgio1751 That's probably why it sounds better. Perfection isn't always good. The Dx7 mk1 has a unique gritty character. All the other versions including Dexed sound too sterile.
Almost real thing with PC4. But with PC4 you can do max 32 layers of massive FM sound programs and mixes with VAST sample based tones plus huge effects arsenal and other VAST manipulations.
@@littlefrog726 Well, pianos and EPs in PC4 will have less velocity layers and not chromatically sampled (one sample for each key), instead one sample stretched across a few keys.
You compare an epic Synthesizer from 1983 with a modern keyboard? This is not significant! You can't get a relation Wich keyboard is better, when one of those is a kind of "cover" of the other keyboard. By the way: it is no Yamaha DX7, it is a DX7 II, that's an other keyboard.
I guess you didn’t get the point Max... The goal is to compare the patches of the DX7 with the same patches when they are loaded on the PC4. The beautiful of the PC4 is that it has a 6 operators FM synthesis engine inside, and it is capable of loading the original exclusive system patches of the DX7 series. The magic is that you can have all the available libraries of DX7 in a PC4, and use them alone or as a starting point if you with to combine with e the V.A.S.T. syntheis from Kurtzweil.
@@robertolotti2669 Well said , a lot to people just don’t get it , there are so many useful sounds that were made on orig DX7 and the DX7s & II are still excellent boards who cares that they have better convertors and sound a bit different from the original , also the Kurz can combine these sounds with all it’s other synthesis types to create very powerful sounds, that’s if you know or have the patience to program most don’t, they’re preset cowboys.
is a comparison between the original thing and the new fm engine on kurzweil pc4/forte, using the same patches to show how close kurz can be to the original fm synth dx7.
