What is bad is that the officer knew him from the last time he tried to violate him. Anytime you tell the police that which is lawful they automatically say you're arguing 🙄
If you I'd and keep explaining yourself to cops they will keep thinking they are right and you wrong. Stop allowing the cops to violate your rights. That cop that said he was in a military, there's a reason you are not anymore coward.
The Supremes have ruled that just by word or action, without physical contact, or using the word detained, if a cop makes you feel that you are not free to leave, a detention has occurred. The mere fact that you have one cop in front of you and, like they typically do, one cop standing behind you can be construed as a detention. Taking the mag out is an illegal seizure which he negated by saying he was willing to take the mag out and not protesting when they did it. Always assert your 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendment protections in an affirmative way bey stating that you are exercising them by name. The 4th denies them the legal ability to seize his magazine. the 5th puts them on notice that he will not be answering any questions, but does not stop them from asking them. The 6th stops them dead in their tracks from asking ANY questions. Once you have invoked your 6th Amendment right to have counsel present during questioning, any question they ask in regards to a stop or investigation will go a long way towards stripping them of their qualified immunity.
Their government remember, they want to be the only ones that have the rights to defend themselves. They want to take our guns and this is proof. Even at this low level of the totem pole they're harassing this man because he has a gun
I think the dispatcher should be asking the caller's if they have witnessed a crime and that open carrying is not a crime. Basically education of the dispatcher.
They would never deter their customers from reporting a revenue generating opportunity!! That's why they always show up. Dollar signs everytime the phone rings!!
Out of the hundreds, maybe thousands of audit videos that i have watched. I'vee only seen 1 dispatcher tell the people they weren't sending the police because recording from a public place is not a crime. I forgot what channel
Exactly! Armed and trained for battle. But whenever they come into contact wth any human being, instantly the police officer's safety is in question and the only priority.
He needs to memorize these quotes from John Bryant @The Civil Right Lawyer "my freedoms do not end where your fear begins" "freedom is scary, deal with it"
I think the cops have been waiting and watching for him. Kind of like harassment. And they'll probably catch him a few more times because that's what they're trying to do, make him quit caring. What's people know their rights and you exercise them the law enforcement will come back around, and try to find a different way to violate them. Because they have to be the number top dog and in control. Eight other people need to show up and start doing that. 4:55 and the cops law enforcement is the one making it worse. He knows it, he knows the guy so this was on purpose. Like I said they've been waiting and watching for him so that they could do this.
The law-enforcement officers in this video told the man you have not broken any laws it is legal to be out with your weapon, but they are claiming it is a disturbance. It is not a disturbance by the individual with the weapons, it is a disturbance by people calling in alleging some crime is being committed. Dispatch in all of these videos I watch never tells the individuals that it’s legal for them to carry in public. They never ask if the person is waving their gun in a threatening manner. They just called law-enforcement to go check it out. This was not a legal detainment. It never is, because the officers never all any crime happening and these officers actually said well you haven’t committed a crime, so why did they stop him? These lawn enforcement agencies need to be sued out of existence, and the legislature need to pass laws to stop law-enforcement from doing this and violating peoples rights.
What the cop cannot get through his head is that it is up to him to educate the people that are calling that it is not a crime and there is no reason for panic
Every state in the united states of America is a open/concealed carry state under the constitution of the united states supreme law of the land. Every square inch of the united states of America is protected under the constitution of the united states of America.
Just name anything & I bet for ' officer safety ' their scared of it . Maybe instead of violating his rights they could open a law book up & learn the few they think they know . These boys need to get a different job .
in some cases they should like when they call about a guy holding a sign that has profanity on it but I am for a cop to do a drive by to make sure a guy carrying a gun is doing so in a legal matter.
So Much I would have said differently.... Like why U guys can't just train the dispatchers to tell the uninformed people that it is legal to do this!!!! That alone would help 100%!!!! So many others, but He did good for the first time filming the interaction.
Taking anything even for a short time is still a seizure. In his case a illegal search and seizure the officers had no legal lawful warrant. Under the 4th amendment warrant clause for those getting their knickers in a bunch there is no such thing as reasonable articulable suspicion doesn't exist anywhere in the text of the fourth amendment and probable cause is only to get a legal lawful warrant.
The fact that men with guns stopped a man with a gun because he had a gun is proof positive that the police think they're literally above the law, and futhermore that we're below it. "It's not normal behavior" The fact that exercising our rights is seen as "not normal behavior" is troubling. Last time I checked, it wasn't illegal to be abnormal. "You need to find a way you can exercise your freedoms and we don't have 30 people calling in" I'm not familiar with this guy in particular, but I'd imagine that's part of the reason he's out there in the first place (I know it's one of the reasons he does it on this channel). The fact that the man can't simply walk down the street in peace because people are concerned about someone exercising their rights is all the more reason for more people to open carry in public - to help educate the public and remove some of the stigma. "We can't detain you, we're not going to detain you" - weird thing to say after illegally detaining someone for at least 15 minutes.
“It’s not normal behavior. Didn’t I see you out here doing the same thing a while back?” My theory:it’s normal behavior for subject as I’ve seen him do it now on multiple occasions. So, why bother subject when he is displaying normal behavior pattern?
The correct response for “we are getting calls, which is DisThePeace - A person exercising their right cannot be made into a crime, people’s reaction are on them, not the law abiding citizen!
Sad to say that the propaganda of “If you see something, say something” has been rooted deeply into the ones whom gave up critical thinking for some one else to do something.
We have Constitutional carry in my state and can carry any way we want. I never open carry. Constitutional Rights Trump All ! 🇺🇸 Shame on this Cop. Feelings dont trump Constitutional rights. These cops just dont get it.
You can load it up before they pull off. You don’t have to wait till they pull off so we are Americans. We are free to do what the hell we want to do when we want to do it as long as we’re not breaking the law it’s not about feelings it’s not about what the cops want.
Most of these types of contacts could be mitigated by the dispatchers. I hear calls daily where they send deputies and officers to investigate lawful activities being reported. The disconnect begins with dispatchers not asking the questions and informing the caller that suspicious is not a crime.
Hey that’s me! Haven’t gotten to watch yet but thanks for the shoutout and I wanted to leave this here because I got some mentions about it on my video as well: 1. This is my area and one of the cops there already knew me so at the end I know I didn’t have to but I gave the guy my name as a “good faith” gesture because I knew as soon as I left the cop that knew my name would’ve just told him anyway. 2. After this they started driving by but for the most part left me alone on my other walks. 3. Once spring was over I was able to take the mask off, trust me I hate it as much as anyone else. 4. I’ve had even more issues with the cops in my area that I’ve been reluctant to post because they like to talk to people I know about me and cause drama. I will be doing more of these walks in other areas in the state.
The problem is the dispatcher. When someone calls in about a second Amendment right and no law is being broken then the dispatcher needs to call them back and explain the law and ask them to please call the non-emergency line unless they see someone actually committing a crime.
The government sure hates a level playing field. Im only allowed a rape alarm in the UK by law, even pepper spray is classed as illegal. You can keep 100 machetes in your home though, you just can't use them by law. The police have pepper spray, tazers, club, and in the bigger cities concealed firearms. I envy your freedom to defend yourself.
@@bonecrusher7297 I completely agree with you. We had 1 mass shooting where 20 kids and 2 teachers died about 20y ago. Then the government stole the firearms. They were still very small numbers of people. Mostly farmers with shotguns to protect livestock.
During WWII citizens of our country DONATED their own firearms to be shipped over to y'all in case the Nazis invaded your shores. Y'all were disarmed back then. This is what happens when you live in a monarchy. Why would the crown arm the peasants?
Oddly, unless there is nearly exact case law and precedent in that specific US Circuit Court, ignorance of the law is EXACTLY an excuse for cops. That is what qualified immunity relies on.
i don't talk to someone who wants to kidnap me that nicely. i had to tell one cop to shut up one time. his response was "you can't talk to me that way" yeah he actually said that. my reply was along the lines of "i can talk to you any way i want cause i don't have qualified immunity". crickets....i wrote a letter to our sheriff but never mailed it. i still may even though it's been like two years ago. but yeah i don't act or talk nice to any of them since i've been made aware of how the think of us and how they treat us.
10 calls from people who have no understanding of our Constitutional Rights and use feelings as a basis of their opinion. Their feelings are not the law. Dispatch need to tell caller that he is exercising his First Amendment right and they will have to see a therapist to deal with their feeling.
You probably meant 2nd but I do have to add if you’re an activist expressing yourself by carrying a gun and using speech a good lawyer would argue the cops violated both the 1st and 2nd amendments by detaining/arresting you, bigger $$$ if the jury buys it so you’re not wrong.
They seriously need to think about a resolution? Easy! Educate the caller. they won't because it defeats the agenda of DON'T EXERCISE FREEDOM! Enforce feelings, not freedom.
Went from 20 calls in a couple minutes to 10 in 6 minutes. And they trying to make it out he is causing a disturbance. It’s not cops job to raise it to a level. Of like they would keep doing what they did. They can’t come out and do what they just did. That would be Police Harassment.
Why is it his responsibility to explain to people that aren't calling him but calling on him that was he's doing is lawful. Exactly right with what you said. Dispatch can ask questions regarding how he's carrying, is it pointing it at anyone? Nope. Then tell them it's perfectly legal. They can still generate a report and the cops can monitor. I feel like they forget they have the ability to watch people.
Did you realize the officer told him he wanted his name “to give it to callers next time” - indicating he would tell the callers “Don’t call us - call him”!!
He should have asked them for a legal lawful warrant,no warrant no name,no warrant no ID. And told them to start educating their dispatchers on the constitution and legal law.
SMH at him giving his name. SMH at him not clarifying if he was detained or not. Dude should have just walked away from them once they said he was legal.
Aint nothing they can do if they are getting calls other than come and investigate. They cant make him stop. And really he doesn't have to give his name either if he hasn't committed a crime.
Correct! ..so they get a call, they respond by driving up to where the "subject" is reportedly at and OBSERVE (Visually Investigate whether it appears that a law is being violated) BEFORE VIOLATING a person's civil/ CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
I am not a big 2nd amendment guy but i know he has a right to do what he doing and i don't see anything wrong with it. If you get 1000 calls it's not his problem as long a as no law has been broken.
Yep. F you gun nuts, but where it's legal, respect those rights. "If we keep getting calls..." What? You'll violate my rights? Aww, is your job tough? Need a tissue to dry your tears?
My rights do not end where they’re feelings begin. The problem is with them not the guy holding the firearm and there’s nothing that I need to do to make them feel better.
Have you noticed how cops go on and off of their radio at very strategic times??... This is to cut you off when you are in the middle of saying something that will corner them And they don't want to provide a response to the very logical thing that you just said.
@@Nutnboujeewe are pretty much past that point now, they are letting armed illegals in to this country. Soon things will get extremely sketchy and the last place you want to be during that is in police custody
@@Nutnboujeeit would literally get dropped and even the disturbing the peace, the courts will drop it not the cop who doesn't even know the law he's charging you with
9:01 MAKE THIS MAKE SENSE. The cop said: "Are you willing to give your name so that way when the next call comes out I can say hey that's such and such, HE'S EXERCISING THE 2nd AMENDMENT FREEDOM AND HE'S NOT HARMING, ANYBODY HE DIDN'T POINT HIS GUN AT ANYBODY, HE'S JUST TRAINING." So why don't he just tell the callers all of that above WRITTEN IN CAPS in the first place without his name? So if he gives you his names, he's automatically not disturbing the peace anymore? lol By giving out his name, how would they know it's the same person with a gun when a person calls and not someone else who's really out to do harm? Why not go by description since that's enough info for cops? Isn't that enough what they use when they detain people that "match the description"? Is that department just straight up giving out names of private citizens who's not breaking the law to ramdom callers on the phone now?
So instead of coming bothering me you missed a perfect opportunity to inform these people that called you that is perfectly legal to walk around with a rifle and a handgun on you and nobody can do anything about it
