the thing is that humans or very smart aliens could agree that if you take 5 of something and 5 of thaat same thing we have 10 of that thing but the words "five" or "ten" comme purely from human thought.
I was in an argument about what key elements make art objectively good, and they started accusing me of not thinking art is subjective. Funny thing is, they used the exact paragraph of me stating art is subjective as evidence that it ruins my argument (that being that colour pallets, style, and cohesion are important to art) so then it was a back and forth of them either stating I didn't think art was subjective or that something isn't objectively good or bad (my examples being into the spider verse and 06.) They then tried to say that objective means everyone has to like it which is false (objective means "not influenced by personal feelings or opinions in considering and representing facts.") And ended off by calling me 12. (Btw, if someone has to resort to calling you young, you've most likely won)
Conservatives use this fallacy when discussing certain aspects of gun control. Theyll agree that guns need to be kept away from deranged people, but then when a conservative gets red-flagged for deranged behavior, they argue that he became only momentarily deranged because hes a family man and hes worried about crime happening to his family. Hes not a truly deranged person so he should keep his guns.
Unfortunately the presenter employed the Dido Fallacy when he was arguing with Straw Mike. Granted, the Dido Fallacy was invented by Innuendo Stodios after this video was made. Also granted, Straw Mike used the Dido Fallscy first.
Here's a painfully common Example: "Being Gay isn't Natural!" "Many Species of Animals have had documented cases of homosexuality." "Well, just because animals do it doesn't mean humans should do it!"
So this was 10 years ago have you updated a video as of yet I play pubg and I'm just wondering when I'm going to be able to make my character do whatever I want even to spit sit walk backwards or do exactly what I wanted to do how far away is this 10 years later from this video I think they're just not giving out the the good stuff player one look pretty close most people don't want to do it like that I just want to have control to a higher degree higher degree
What if someone claims you are using a strawman argument when they didn't understand you were making a hypothetical on the logic they are using as an example of bad logic and/or incorrect definitions of words? Not many people seem to really talk about the people who try to claim fallacies in other peoples arguments but don't understand the argument.
I think if the thought experiment were actually concieved, it would be better if the commitee would be placed at the worst position in society, that would prevent them from "gambeling" and having a super oppressed class, but makingbitbvery small, so they probably don't fall into that class
Einstein hated quantum mechanics because it underminded his belief in a objective reality. But quantum mechanics is undeniably true. So were does this leave us with the mathematics question? Answer: if you can't separate the external world from human consciousness then mathematics is the product of our minds and so called external reality!
2:00 no some just want to win, come on now 😅 Also thankyou for the explanation. I came here via RU-vid search after watching a vidoe essay that used this term, and I needed a refresher. A moment of "wait what does that mean again"
You speak very fast and the switching of images is also very fast . Something which is cute for a casual watching eating a sandwich but it is not good if you are watching a sci video. Also it is hard to watch if english is not your mother language. Regarding the content is interesting. Good job.
The word WRONG IN THIS IS "FALACY" SO START THE WHOLE ARGUMENT WITHOUT THE WORD FALACY modern world!!! Using modern tech! Using freedom! A person! Human rights and not being a slave to hierarchy! One person! One mind, one voice, one thought! A name of...from the dependent of....belonging to NO ONE other yourself belonging to the name of! Not religious, governmental, over tlruled by! ONE PERSON, A FREE NONE CONSENTING PERSON! TO BE FREE ON THIS PLANET!! STRAW, FROM THE GROUND, ONLY MADE A SHEEP BY MAN!
By your definition, if this video had any impact on my world view then it is an act of violence. This feels like an attempt to take a word that is universally accepted as negative and alter its definition enough that it can be applied to what you choose thereby making whatever you choose universally accepted as negative. Our language is distinctive for a reason. Calling something violent simply to cause a more visceral reaction when discussing it detracts from open discussion.
We barely understand human consciousness and what it truly means to be fully human, and people seriously think they can transcend it? Not to be overdramatic, but I think transhumanism is a dangerously delusional pipe dream, and the people of wealth, power, and influence who want to make it a reality are just going to make the world worse for similar reasons socialists did. The philosophy fails to comprehend human nature and take it into account in the formulation of their worldview. Any worldview that denies human nature and doesn't take both its virtues and vices into proper account will only produce unnecessary suffering and dysfunction when they try to faithfully implement their ideas like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. Social engineering and playing God basically never ends well.
They will fail miserably, trust me lol. Either some biological entity, wild and unknown, will blow us apart or a Carrington Event will blow us apart. We don't even understand the oceans or even the Amazon Rainforest, even ourselves. How can we possibly begin to question all of it lol? Elites be Elites and we are just commoners doing what they tell us. No worries lol the Gods over and under will deal with them sooner than we might think 😉 We almost had a Carrington Event back in 2013 from what I recall reading about. It missed earth and we humans dodged a big, massive bullet. If that solar storm would have slammed into earth, you and I would have likely never been communicating all this right now as society would have had to change its plan (they will come to this realization one day, they are unaware of this, trying to fix it with our power grid but to no avail.) We must use what we know wisely and sparingly I think, otherwise we will have no plan and that will just make our future problems far greater than what they already should be. Think about this, technology is awesome ngl but we cannot ever rely on it. It is a goal, a progress and relying on it is dangerous and is just going to create problems one day, in our lifetimes maybe...
Hahha…should be shared with our Intellectual nouveau riche college students who believe they argue from some sort of educational high ground..laughable at best
