Photo1x1 is your free photography course by Wolf Amri. My goal is to make you understand what you are doing when you take pictures. The chapters and videos of this photography course are short and very easy to understand photography lessons. We use the principles of learning, give you mnemonics, and compare certain complex photography terms to everyday situations to help you understand. So subscribe to our photography course, ask questions, and give us feedback. With your help, we can become the best free photography course on the web. 8571
Start from 1 and double and double ... 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, .... so any number in the series is half the next number and double the previous number. These are related to the area of the aperture - double the area we get twice as much light, half the area we get half the amount of light Now take the square root of these numbers we get something related to the diameter of the aperture. They are approximately, 1, 1.4, 2, 2.8, 4, 5.6, 8, 11, 16, 22. Recognize that series?
While that is correct, I have to admit that I needed to read that four times to understand. I think that is a problem with a lot of things in education. Abstracting too much doesn’t necessarily help understanding. That’s why I try to explain things rather in-depth 😉.
You took the living creature, out of it's environment, subjected it to a long continues and stressful multi device test... All for a video to boodt your channel... . .
I totally understand your concern. But trust me, I‘m an ultra-environmentalist. I would never hurt an animal for my own benefit. We let dozens of spiders stay in our house over the winter if they choose to come in. I sat it back afterwards. Plus: the same species of spiders sits for days on the same flower in our garden.
Then you better place them both on the floor/table (with the indicator at the exact same direction. And change the camera body from one lens to the other, rather than the lenses. 😉
I hope it was helpful nonetheless. I totally understand your point. This is a video that will give you a rather high-end output. Not everyone has the budget for such a setup, but now that you know the basics, you should be able to create something decent with less budget. Make sure to watch my editing video that will show you how to get the best out of not-so-well-lit green screen footage ;).
@@wolfamri haha it was! it told be basicly everything i needed/wanted to know, and i dropped a hundred bucks yesterday on a green screen and ring light and should prob do the trick for what im trying to do XD, also great plug, ill check out the editing video ^^
It depends on the question you want to answer. If it is which lens you need to get the same view on APS-C as you'd get on Full frame, you have to divide it by 1.5. It's similar converting feet to meter or vice versa - from one side you have to multiply and from the other you have to divide. Same with currency, etc.. There's always two sides.
9:50 there are some invert ring that permit that; they fit to the camera, the you screw, as usual, the lens to the ring, that in this case, hás a cable that goes to another ring that first on the front of the lens, making the eletronic contact with it.
There are another alternative; using two lenses, une fitted normally on the camera, the other, screwed, filter screw to filter screw with a male to male screw ring.
10:18 that I didn't know but I know a better way, at least for Canon; set the aperture diseired, press and hold dept off field preview button and turn the camera off.
@@wolfamri Yes, but it will not give me the performance I need. For example, my 28mm wide-angle perspective control lens is useless to me as a normal perspective control lens.
@Narsuitus That's correct, but as I said in the video, either side has pros and cons. If you want more reach, crop will give you that with the same lens. Just having full frame lenses is not really a reason not to use APS-C 😉. Neither is better, they just have different strengths.
Hands down the best video that I have seen covering this as a complete beginner and every new photographer/videographer needs to watch this. Short, simple and to-the-point.
I'm giving an introductory photography course to my colleagues, and I hope you don't mind if I refer them to your invaluable videos and website and yeah few subscribers. Thanks
Hi! In premiere Pro, I'd first key. They key will then be applied to the "raw" footage and the later applied grading is only applied to the keyed parts. That makes matching foreground and background easier. 😉
Thank you for giving me your honest feedback. Please feel free to give us your opinions on better solutions. Any video will always be subjective. But in general, I think you may have a totally wrong idea about how much money youtubers like me make on this platform and with affiliate links 😉. Just to give you a hint, because I like to be honest with people: in the last 28 days, I made USD 344 on youtube and USD 79 on Amazon. From ALL my youtube videos together 😉.
Wolf, this is a great review on some products and your video is 100% matching your title. I would love to see some budget choices that aren’t on your Amazon affiliate list. P.S. I am sorry that you aren’t making more on YT. Try showcasing a budget item that works for the same exact purpose and link it.
Thank you. No need to be sorry, I enjoy making these videos and I even learn the one or the other new thing while doing my research. So all good. I just don't like when people think I'm in it to grab quick money ;). There are budget options, no doubt and I long used growth lights used for agroponics on a self made wooden frame. I also played with lots of other things. But the results I got were no where near as good as the ones I got with the tools I used in this video. Besides I have learned that many people aren't as much into DIY things as I am. Partly because they don't have access to a workshop, partly because they don't even know where to start when builing a wooden frame. Nanlite isn't the most high-end product either. So it's always a question of budget vs actual result. You can easily spend thousands more, but you wouldn't get a better result. So for me that was the reason why I chose the tools used in the video.
Yes, my space is too small for the entire mechanism. I'm just getting the cloth. I took a look at your videos to try and find the video editing program that you recommend to edit the green screen video. I'm using CapCut. I tried others that were recommended and although CapCut is quite faulty, it was better than the others.
I'm just pondering this very moment what to get. I have a small space with a lot of bookcases and other clutter, so I think the only realistic option is Westcott X-Drop Pro Wrinkle-Resistant Backdrop Sweep. It won't be perfect but should be much better than the system I'm using now to try and cut out backgrounds. Thanks again. Your videos (background screens and lighting) were both very helpful. I look forward to watching more of your videos in the future.
The x-drop is amazing. Just keep in mind that the stand has a pretty large footprint. Perhaps consider the fabric only and attach it to bookcases, etc. It doesn’t need too much tension since the fabric is lightweight and soft.
Hi! I’m afraid no. There will be a new focal length comparison coming up, but it’s not a landscape lens comparison. For landscape, lenses are not that critical. You can usually set up a tripod and can choose f/11 or so for a decent depth of focus (if desired). That’s the same for every lens. So for landscape you can’t really go wrong if you get everything you want into the frame. Surely higher end lenses will give you a slightly sharper image or less lens flare when shooting into the sun, but there is no difference like the low f-number for portraits. An exception is nightsky photography though. This is where low f-numbers help a lot 😉.
