Safety Third is a weekly show hosted by William Osman, NileRed, The Backyard Scientist, Allen Pan, Peter Sripol, and a couple other RU-vid "Scientists". Sometimes we have guests, sometimes it's just us, but always: safety is our number three priority.
one time i was on acid with my girlfriend in the shower, we were tripping balls and having a heart to heart, when my smoke alarm battery started chirping. 0/10 experience. it took us way too long to figure out where it was coming from. ☠️ and then we couldn't reach it and my gf jumped to grab it off the ceiling & broke the plastic lmfao.
my personal experience with american food is that it's similar to romania, which is really not a good thing at all (im french and i will never leave my country because every other country i went to has trash food in comparison)
I love disguisedtoast's name bc it's a mishearing of a hearthstone card (who says "this guy's toast" when you play him) and i'm so glad that he was a helping hand in shaping DruglessDrugless
i’m a high school senior and pretty much everyone i’m friends with is extremely pro-nuclear for pretty rational reasons, not just because we’re stupid contrarian high schoolers lmao
That whole argument that we can't have nice things because people are lazy or will take advantage of goodwill... To that I ask "so Adobe is the answer?!"
Banijay aren't some random Indians, they're a big television company from France. They even own the Big Brother reality show among many other franchises
physics is not what holds back nuclear energy, it's economics. it's 10 times more expensive than renewables plus storage once impemented and decommssioned. and to build it safe it has to cost money, even China haven't been able to scale up nuclear energy. And the same once we crack fusion, except it'll be two orders of magnitude higher instead of one. this is still no reason not to continue the research though.
@kylehill Fact check time: While we need renewables a lot more than nuclear power and we need nuclear power a hell of a lot more than fossil fuels, pretending nuclear power has only killed around 50 people is not helpful to the cause of using using nuclear over fossil fuels, nor is using such a specific definition of impact from nuclear disasters. Around *2000* people have been estimated to have already *died* from the evacuation of Fukushima. (The extreme evacuation effort likely saved many more lives that would have been taken by radiation exposure) The number of people directly harmed by the radiation of the Chernobyl disaster is staggering, well into the *hundreds of thousands*. Over *6000* thyroid cancer cases have been linked to the disaster by 2005 in Ukraine alone. There is documented evidence of a significant impact on fertility, which even for a bit of an antinatalist like myself, is a violation you cannot just ignore. There has been a *200%* increase in birth defects and a *250%* increase in congenital birth deformities in children born in the Chernobyl fallout area since 1986. People continue(d?) to be born into the disaster well after it had occurred. There have been *800 000* people in Belarus alone officially registered as affected by the radiation. The number of people displaced by the Chernobyl disaster is in the *hundreds of thousands*. You don't get to sit on your science communicator high horse while cherry-picking facts and just straight up misleading/lying. If you'd like some quick reassurance, here are two articles, just drowning in reputable linked sources: BBC The true toll of the Chernobyl disaster By Richard Gray, 26 July 2019 Verywell Health Children of Chernobyl: Birth Defects, Deformities, Ailments By Mary Kugler, RN Updated on September 01, 2022
In the context of the clock, and even of sfx too. Human innovation, from farming, to mining, to social structure, has always been in this context of play. (Not some silly innovation for profit) Humans who see other people's dreams (literally, chasing your dream in the same sense as the Wyandotte and other indigenous people) and work together to make them real.
1:43:38 This would basically be something like the Linux Foundation, no? iirc there's a number of nonprofits that do that sort thing for FOSS, especially for Linux distros and whatnot
