A star explodes 1 million light years away, we got it covered; a galaxy found at the edge of the observable universe? we got it covered; a planet in the habitable zone of a dwarf star exhibiting earth-like properties? we got it covered; the James Webb Telescope finds heavier elements at the dawn of time? we got it covered; water on Mars, and landing on the moon, Voyager updates and NASA milestones, everything happening in and around the world of cosmology, we got it covered. Come, claim your Territory: because this is your space.
Subscribe to Territory: ru-vid.com/show-UC8SGU9hQEaJpsLuggAhS90Q
Space and the universe is not what we've been told. Less than 500 people can claim that they've been in space and they are all free masons that participate in secret societies. So that being said that means that there are less than 500 liars out of the billions of people on Earth that claimed to be in space.
I had a feeling the JW telescope would be a real problem for cosmology. Its the constant repeating history of humanity. Believe one thing for awhile (new technology) nope we were wrong... and repeat.
We probably shouldn't assume that the universe is homogeneous, uniform, or that it doesn't vary in the ways it operates in different regions. We shouldn't presume to know the unknown.
What is wrong with scientists? Im stupid and I know we arent the centre of the universe. Wait...we're not the oldest galaxy 🙀. Time is infinite. Always has been and always will be
Why are we humans always so surprised when our best theories do not fully explain observation? No matter how good any theory is, it is not the same as reality; and it is almost definitely sure to be a simplification. All we can ever hope to do it is to continually improve on what we know.
What makes anyone think that we have any kind of concrete understanding on galaxies that are this far away when we don't even have a complete understanding of our own planet?
EVER HEARD OF GOD? TRUST THE SCIENCE BIGGEST LIARS ON EARTH AS SOON AS THEY GET PROVEN WRONG THEY COME UP WITH AN EXCUSE WHY THIER ORIGINAL THEORY WAS A CROCK
Its really not that big of a deal. I made galaxies bigger and faster back then. How aboutt you create an entire universe and then tell me how you feel after a half billion years. Unappreciative monkeys...
That's because we're within the expanding wave front of the original event that created our 'known' universe. But there is no proof that it was alone in all of space when it happened. We could be looking at things that existed beyond that event horizon and we're seeing them now because our vision has finally become acute enough to see light penetrating the attenuating wave front of the expansion.
sry but it's now very clear that the science is pointing towards a new reality where the big bang probably never happened, i know it's hard for you to accept that, history proves that scientists are unlikely to accept new theories even after they're proven to be true LOL
Why say galaxies take a long time to form? Shoot a bottle rocket. When it blows up there are BIG SPARKS and little ones. So galaxies were formed at the time of so called big bang
Well we already know that the Big Bang is a bunch of BS, and we also already know that there is a creator. It’s awesome to know that we are finding new galaxies but we already know how and when they were made
Brian Greene, Neil DeGrasse Tyson, Michio Kaku, et al. should be called Astrophysics THEORISTS. Every few years we get better evidence to make wiser GUESSES. He wants says it takes ''billions and billions of years to make a universe'' when it might take trillions and trillions of years and it just hasn't been proven yet. Theorists ALL.
How arrogant are scientists to think they have all the answers that they believe their beliefs won't be upset and challenged? It's a preposterous mentality. The biggest error is the big bang theory itself.
The thing I can't understand, is why Astronomers knowing that the Universe is expanding, still will not acknowledge that after a certain distance from us (100% Red Shift) the stars and Galaxies will disappear from view. So we CANNOT date the age of the Universe based solely on the Red Shift. It is hubris to think the Universe began its expansion from this local region when the vastness of the viewable Universe would statistically indicate a starting point elsewhere. Given that and going by the results of the Red Shift, we may be in either a younger or older section of the Universe. I think the missing matter, the so called; Black Matter, can be taken as a sort of proof that the missing matter constitutes the rest of the unviewable Universe.
NASA defines the Universe thusly: "The universe is everything. It includes all of space, and all the matter and energy that space contains...and of course, time". Can I assume that the Universe ends when there is no matter or energy beyond that certain point(s) of space. In other words, does the Universe continue or exist beyond when and where there is simply nothingness? Or, perhaps, is space and time created as the Universe expands? To point: When matter and energy are inputted into a balloon, space is created within the balloon (the universe within the balloon grows larger). However, nothing exists beyond the edge. The edge. That is the point that we are attempting to view, the most distant of space beyond which nothing exists. If possible to be "viewed" we would be, or think that would be, viewing as far back into time as would be possible at that moment. The JWST has helped us to reach further back into time by viewing the light from objects more distant than had been possible before. With the JWST we have come to discover that the Universe is older than we presumptively calculated. And I'm certain that as our technology is advanced we will see objects even more distant, thus peering even further "back into time".
"In the beginning.... God...created the heavens and the earth." Genesis 1:1 HELLOOOO.... the faith it takes to believe NOTHING created .EVERYTHING is mind bEnding . Your religion of unproven/speculated science is .... well .. C'mon... yall just have to know how willful your blindness truly is... Goodluck with that when you pass from this life and stand before the Father of life and love to give an account for yourselves and the rejection of the eternal life of love you fight so desperately against. JesusChrist died so we could live. Why would y'all seek a second death?(eternal separation from God) ~I.J.N~
You're reading a book written by bronze age primitives who had no idea what they were talking about HELOOOO. How is claiming that some god creature created everything from nothing proof that it happened?
Here's my problem. They talk about a galaxy that existed 500 million years after the big bang.... as though a 'year' was a fixed duration. However, at the beginning, right after the big bang, all the matter and energy was very close together, so time would have been at a virtual standstill. In that context, what's a 'year'?
Gravity is a major factor that holds back particles from progression sometimes. As in it stifled their transition to a degree. So wouldn't it be easy to assume that these galaxies with mismatched ages and sizes are operating under either a much higher or much lower magnetic field allowing the pull of materials to happen faster? Time is no more than a transition so our idea that this universe should be the only example or assuming another could not form faster is the height of arrogant ignorance. If we look at the idea that the big bang was just a massive dispersal of energy and that plenty if stuff existed before hand we can assume that the difficulty in observing beyond it is both age and the energy itself from the reaction and the entirety of that reaction acting as a sort of transparent shield we have to slowly look through. Assuming nothing was on the other side was also arrogant ignorance.
