It is very interesting that this Arab from Mecca declares in his speeches that he is the Naqib of Mecca. As is known, there is no official Naqabat in Mecca. If so, then why does this Arab, without hesitation, declare to everyone that he is the Naq al Ashraf of Mecca?! I think he needs to worry about his statements. Naqabat activities are strictly prohibited in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Ассалааму алейкум,сиз Султан Зарбагыштын таарыхын билет белениз?Билсениз кайсыл китептен окудунуз эле? Мен биринчи жолу угуп жатам Султан Зарбагышты, Эгер сизда биринчи жолу Султан Зарбагышты угуп атсаныз анда,биз тарыхты билбейт экенбиз.

Султан Зарбагышты енди биринши еситтим, онын ким екенинде билмес едим

Yes, there are earlier reliable manuscripts that were written during the time of Ahmad Yasawi by his students, in which his paternal genealogy tree is accurately indicated, the tree of which goes back to the lord of Muhammad Hanafiyya bin Khazrati Ali. This manuscript "Majma at-Tawarikh" is a work whose source is a work which was written later i.e. in the 17-18 centuries, and not as they write 650 years ago. the manuscript was written at the request of Sheikh Magdumi Azam (death 1542) after his death, but the book was not completed and was added to in the 18th century. Prominent scholars from all over the world have long given their assessment of this source of yours, here is one example: “Majmu at-Tawarikh does not provide a sufficiently reliable basis for establishing an accurate chronology and determining the exact dates of life and death of the sheikhs, khans and military leaders mentioned in the text. In the essay, in form of legends and myths, many stages of which have still been little studied and poorly illuminated by other ancient sources introduced into scientific use"

Болади

Кайси бирлари

Boshidegi oramdan kirganda 24 maktab yoni ikkinchisi kirgilida margilondan chiqishda mostan keyin chapga kirib ketiladi

Сіз кім сыз?

Сыз кім сыз?