Welcome to the official RU-vid channel of Stadler!
Stadler has been building trains for over 80 years. The provider of mobility solutions in rail vehicle construction, service and signalling technology has its headquarters in Bussnang, eastern Switzerland. It has a workforce of around 14,000 based in various production and engineering locations as well as more than 80 service locations. The company is conscious of its social responsibility for sustainable mobility and therefore stands for innovative, sustainable and durable quality products. The product range in the field of mainline railways and city transport includes high-speed trains, intercity trains, regional and suburban trains, metros, tramways and trams. Stadler also manufactures main-line locomotives, shunting locomotives and passenger carriages. It is the world’s leading manufacturer in the rack-and-pinion rail vehicle industry.
Want to know a bit more about Stadler? Visit our website at www.stadlerrail.com
niestety ale ten wagon nie ma zalet. Tak okropnie rozplanowany w środku. Wózki niedopracowane, trzeszczą i strzelają przy rozruchu. Drzwi otwierają się topornie. Krakowaki to przy nim wygoda i luksus. Ktoś chyba czegos nie przemyslał. Ale przetarg pewnie był ustawiony pod Niemców.
The 5 year old energetic cavitation impact company in Canada will safely store highly competitive hydrogen gaseous fuel at (25 Cents per Kilo Gram is equivalent to 25 Cents per gasoline gallon equivalent) with any type of ocean, fresh or polluted pond water is comparable to Prof. Marc Ramsey, Vanderbilt University with his 8 year old RU-vid video titled "Energetic Cavitation Impact" worth exploring for open minds.
Hydrogen will soon be coming from any type of water safely stored on-board any train, truck or boat using energetic cavitation impact by Eirex Tech the 5 year old company in Canada. View the 8 year old RU-vid video by Prof. Marc Ramsey representing Vanderbilt University titled "Energetic Cavitation Impact" or view Cavitation Energy Systems who was threatened to stop free energy demonstrations using cavitation with water. When they used salt water comparable to ocean water the results of cavitation from diesel injectors with salt water was highly explosive. I wonder if Eirex Tech has any noticible improvements with ocean water instead of using polluted or clean pond water?
Stadler kann keine Bahnen bauen … Sorry aber im Sommer bahnen ohne Fenster ? Die Klima fällt aus was ist dann ? Ja sieht schön aus sind allerdings alle ohne Fenster !
Das sah für mich wie eine Dauerfahrt aus. Wie ist es mit immer wieder anhalten Türen öffnen, schließen und anfahren um auf tempo zu kommen. Wie weit käme er dann?
es ist gefährlich mit zügen von stadler zu fahren, die bahnen haben oft tests nicht bestanden und werden von rachtsradikalen alkoholikern zusammengebaut
Nein, aber ich halte trotzdem nicht viel davon. Proprietär bedeutet in diesem Kontext, dass eine Stadt oder wer auch immer, die sich das hier kauft super schlecht wieder von diesem System wegwechseln kann. Man sperrt sich mit dem Kauf selbst in das Stadler-System ein
Man will aber ein herstellerübergreifendes System haben, wenn man sowas einsetzt. Wer will denn bitte nur Stadler fahren? Und vor allem, wer will sich für die nächsten 50 Jahre auf Stadler festlegen?
Ερώτηση 1η: Η εταιρία σας μπορεί να κατασκευάσει σύγχρονες αυτοκινητάμαξες για πλάτος γραμμής 60 cm; Ερώτηση 2η: Η εταιρία σας μπορεί να αναβαθμίσει τροχαίο υλικό κατασκευασμένο από άλλες εταιρίες (AEG/LEW/MAN);
As a californian i feel so honored that a stadler flirt in the metrolink livery beat a world record especially when i live in san bernadino and i see this train every day
Little to no info, it seems the train was driving very slow like 60km/h also very constant speed and ideaal climate conditions so in real life you can easily divide it by 4 …
The 'Arrow' service this set is intended for is only nine miles long, so that amount of distance on a single tank is pretty significant. Still can't beat overhead wires though.
Wow nice! Don’t know what the prices for hydrogen are atm. But this has great potential and it’s very efficient and carbon neutral. If it can be a fast train it would be perfect
Hydrogen isn very expensive I watched several videos with a Toyota Mirai and the Mirai holds about approximately. Three to four kilograms of fuel on that fuel costs between 140 $280 and that will give the Mauri about 300 to 350 MI
Hydrogen is already history. CNG has already won in industrial applications. Toyota will buy back all their hydrogen Mirai cars within the next few years due to failing and decommissioing of hydrogen infrastructure. Meanwhile, Amtrak's Southwest Chief continues to roll coal in their diesel powered P42s just 30 miles south of Pueblo twice daily... and that train requires two fueling stops for its Chicago to Los Angeles every single day. Diesel and electric railways continue to win. Hydrogen is a myth. CNG is much better. Battery electric trains are foolish. Call me when dymethyl ether is seriously considered to replace Diesel and CNG. Until then, keep dreaming. Nothing else can touch traditional electric and diesel electric locomotives...
What is the use of this? at 10eu a kg, just electrifying the track will be more cost efficient in only a couple of years at best.. Also going thousands of miles on a single tank of hydrogen is just a question of bringing more hydrogen.. If possible liquified.. Its like the car going the furtherst on a single tank of gas, when its carrying a fuel bowser..
In the EU a battery train usually makes more sense for small branch lines because they can recharge when they reach the mainline and there is electric ovehead infrastructure. In the U.S. there are vast parts of the country where there is no electric overhead anywhere nearby, so minor branch lines might choose hydrogen instead of battery trains depending on what their use case is. From the video, the world record for a battery train is 220 km, while the world record for hydrogen is 2803 km.
Rail corporation CEOs want to show quarterly profit and get big bonuses. Electrification and proper maintenance cuts into those profits. Granted RoI on Electrification is 2 to 5 years but the dont have the spine to justify the lesser profits even until then. Plus they don't give a squat about the environment.
Sadly the first European tender last year to purchase hydrogen powered multple units didn't result in any offers from the industry. They are still in the R&D fase. New battery powered multiple units from Stadler are for this decade the only solution sofar to replace the current Diesel-electric Stadler DMU's
Umm… overhead wires not an option? Technology which has been powering trains in an efficiently and environmentally friendly way for more than 100 years? And without the use of extremely polluting batteries?
@@miles5600 Or we could simply put up wires and immediately start running trains with pantographs…. Oh, but right, I forgot, the big 4 freight companies are not interested in saving the environment…😐
@@damianoandreaarrigoni4401Battery trains are mostly for use on lines that have too limited traffic to be worth it to fully electrify. Typically, many secondary lines in Europe now purchase battery electric multiple unit trains to replace their DMU's. Of course, some overhead wires are still put up as "charging islands", but you save a lot of money by only partially electrifying the lines and running most of the trip on battery. For these lower traffic lines, it's not a choice between battery trains or overhead lines, it's a choice between battery trains, diesel, or shutting the line down. And say whatever you want about batteries, they are still a lot better for the environment than fossil fuels.
Very cool! There is no reason why we should be using trains that emit dangerous carcinogens in 2024...Hydrogen, electric, or some combination? That's the future of transit! Well done, Stadler!
@@obelic71 And still at cryogenic temperatures the pressure is significant, and liquid H2 only achieves 8.5 megajoules per liter while diesel is 35.8 MJ per liter.
@@ElectricNed Diesel for Ships, trains and heavy industry is not easy to replace. The ease of use, storage and availlable infrastructure makes it very hard to replace. Also most industrial Hydrogen today is refined from natural gas. Using liquid natural gas as a fuel directly would make more sense then convert it to hydrogen and then use it as a fuel. Only when hydrogen is produced by nuclear , wind, water and solar from water it becomes the green energy.they claim today.
What a pity that hydrogen is so energy-intensive to produce and then difficult to transport and difficult to store. (A pity that it escapes from any storage tank and it makes pipes and valves brittle.)
