Scott Adams (famous for creating Dilbert) is a trained hypnotist, and is widely recognized as an expert on persuasion. Adams has emerged as one of the most influential observers of politics in the United States. His bestselling book, "Win Bigly," teaches persuasion, and his bestselling book "How to Lose Almost Every Time and Still Win Big" is widely considered the best book ever written on developing systems for success. His most recent book is Loserthink, which teaches you how to avoid it. If you enjoy learning how to be more effective in life while catching up with the interesting news, this is the channel for you.
Is this debate the moment Barry cut the puppet strings to let Joe fall unaided? Obama's plan has been stewing for too long and with such determination for it to be an accident, I would think. Obamas desire to (quote) ''Bring America to its knees'' requires a well thought out Machiavellian master plan.
57:33 Scott explains he doesn't support Israel, then apologizes by saying, "I love the Jewish people." But, for the last two years Scott has constantly said he does not like "groups" only "individuals".
Scott - the GOP will absolutely try to lose, but Project 2025 was to meet the criticism that they don't offer a positive alternative for people to choose. Normally the GOP just threatens to outlaw abortion nationally, while ignoring all the winning issues (economy, open border, etc.). ANYTHING they offer will be vilified by the Cult, but they had to offer something.
Scott. I highly doubt you will read this but I hope you will. The Democrats do not suffer from TDS because they are humorless, believe the news is real or are afraid of strong, confident white men, all of which is true BTW but that isn't the root cause. They don't actually hate Trump, or at least remember why they do. They hate us, his supporters. After their 2016 loss we ruthlessly mocked them on social media and laughed in their faces. We memed them until they cried then made memes of them crying. They were humiliated. Now, they'll gladly burn the country to the ground just to get their petty revenge.
Reagan had almost certainly practiced that joke previously, knowing the age issue would be brought up at some point. Maybe Trump thought ahead about what he would do if Biden sounded incoherent at some point since that was likely, but I’m not certain he would have put both of those sentences together then. Seems like he just did it spur of the moment. Linking the thoughts “I don’t know what he just said” with “I don’t think he knows, either” was genius, because it is the second part that everyone is worried about. Devastating for Biden, and combined with his slack-jawed expression and inability to respond immediately due to the muted microphone rule HE required, he destroyed himself. Every leader in the world now knows Biden does not plan well (we knew that during the Afghanistan withdrawal debacle), nor does he know what to do in the moment. He is no leader in any sense or situation. Biden is a danger to our security and position in the world. When Trump brought up the point that Biden is not respected around the world or by our military, this is exactly what he meant. Biden made it clear when he denied that charge with no actual evidence or examples that he doesn’t even realize it. We are not safe while Biden is in office.
The RU-vid algorithm has stopped feeding me CWSA. I'm a regular RU-vid listener. (I live overseas so I listen about 10-12 hours later). RU-vid algorithm knows this and used to provide the next episode everytime. About 2 weeks ago, I got busy and missed a few episodes. Got back on after a few days and tried to catch up on back episodes, but gave up and just skipped a few and resumed listening to the latest one. But RU-vid no longer offers it to me automatically. Just a bug, resulting from my temporary change in viewing habits? Or suppression?
SCOTUS: You can’t just throw your rival in prison because you don’t like him. DEMOCRATS: So you’re saying we can drop bombs on him? SCOTUS: You really can’t even charge your rival with a crime because his presidency made you mad. DEMOCRATS: Got it. So we can incinerate his house with him in it? SCOTUS: The Constitution protects officials from being terrorized with lawfare for official actions they undertook while in office. DEMOCRATS: Ah. Makes sense. So we can officially assassinate everyone we don’t like? SCOTUS: Prosecuting a politician because you don’t like his politics would destroy our country, and we’re not going to allow it. DEMOCRATS: Roger that. So what you’re saying is: we are officially allowed to eliminate Trump and the Supreme Court as long as we, like, say it’s official and stuff?
@Youknowwhoin2024 I'm too much of a hothead with too many skeletons in my closet. Also, I don't have much use for money and I'm not easily controlled by my ego. I'm not politician material. Lol
I guess Mr. Black never heard the term "obfuscation" mixed with dementia which is what VP Biden used in that interview and what HE is using in this interview.
@@notidentified4031 Home as in Slovenia? At lest we know Barron won’t be joining the military in any capacity. Good thing he’s not following in his father’s sex addict playboy need a a lawyer life style. Then you have the rest of the grifter mafioso kids in the family he has to stay away from setting bad examples. Do they have a dog yet? 😂
The only people talking about Project 2025 are the same liberals and leftists who believe all the Trump is a dictator stuff so you know it is a leftist operation.
Blaming Jill Biden, saying she's in charge, and then hoping Joe will voluntarily quit his post CANNOT work. Either she is in charge and will make Joe fight you harder over it, or Joe's in charge and you've insulted him and his wife, and they will fight you harder over it.
I find "you wanna bet" to be a good way to snap someone out of pretending to be afraid of something. When you offer amazing odds in their favor and they still won't take it, it's telling. If they are sincere, but not thinking clearly, putting a probability on their belief, which is what you do before doing the bet-math, can be very introspective. When you walk away from a conversation where you wouldn't take the bet, it's harder to convince even yourself that you are actually worried about this thing. For example: I'll give you 20 to 1 odds that neither of these statements will be true: 1. Trump will not be president in February 2029 (not president for life) 2. Biden will not be president in December 2028 (not serving a full second term) It works on hoaxes too. "I'll bet you $20 he didn't say that" or "I'll bet you $20 that didn't happen." Do they actually believe what they say? Probably not, but if they lose $20 over it, they will remember though! Offer a legitimate bet in their price range that they should obviously take if they are serious, and watch them work out it's still a bad bet. Then ask them what odds they would accept. They need to do the math on how unlikely their pretend fears are.
Some 30 percent of Black Americans said they would vote for former President Donald Trump in a new poll, a huge jump from the percentage of Black people who voted for him in the last two elections. The survey was published on Wednesday after it was carried out by the New York Times and the Siena College Research Institute.
Is it too late to blame Joe’s woes on climate change? Or the Russians? Havana Syndrome? One would think the blue brainiacs would have a handy lie ready, even if the debate was meant as an excuse to replace him.
You should do more research project 2025. It's a valuable blue print to reform the country and staff the next Trump administration. When people understand it it will increase support for Trump rather then negatively impact the election.
You are spot on Scott. Trump could have hammered him but knew he didn't need to and that it would have been a distasteful optic. Instead, in one statement, he annihilated Biden.
