“Cheating Scandal!” || Hans Niemann DESTROYS Magnus Carlsen So Bad He Quits! || Sinquefield Cup 2022 

lol you are fan of self admited cheater and lier?

@@Tymczas are you defined by the worst choices in your life???

@@albertmcmullen2669 You’re the biggest fool!! Shut up!! 🤫

In an article by CNN, posted Sept. 28, 2022, the headline is: "Chess world champion Magnus Carlsen explicitly accuses rival Hans Niemann of cheating." Then the article goes on, quoting Carlsen's own words, to amply substantiate the accuracy of the headline. More substantiation of the idea that Carlsen accused Hans of cheating exists in other places as well. And indeed Carlsen went beyond words and acted as if Hans was beneath his contempt several times, making more headlines in the process. So it's hard to know what you're talking about, frankly, when you act like Magnus is just an innocent nice guy, who was just trying to play his game and made no startling claims. He made the claims, but didn't back them up, and used his fame and power to needlessly hurt a fellow chess player.

@@polarvortex3294 CNN is your "source" ?? lol is that the best you can do? garbage in, garbage out hell, you couldn't even read my post correctly. you are not doing yourself any favours here.

@@victorfinberg8595 If a person's skill at reading corresponds to their skillful use of punctuation and grammar, than I'm at least as skilled at reading as you are, to put it mildly. So I don't think I misunderstood you. Also, CNN quoted Magnus himself, as I mentioned, so in truth he is the ultimate source underpinning my views. Still, sometimes I'm wrong about things... So I am rather curious about what you think I misunderstood about your first comment. Seemed like you said Magnus didn't call Hans a cheater, and that Magnus only had himself to blame for the loss, in part because he likes to experiment with odd openings in games, even against strong players, counting on his great skill to save him should he run into trouble. Isn't that right? Anyway, I wish nothing but the best for you in your endeavors. And I'm sure we agree on much in life in other areas, aside from this small controversy, regarding which we are merely outsiders looking in. For instance, I'm not usually a CNN fan either. I just figured that when it comes to chess they would have no real ideological axe to grind. Also, we both like chess itself, seemingly. ♟️

@@polarvortex3294 i just spent half an hour writing a lengthy, hostile response ... and it's gone. ok, look 1) CNN, as a mainstream media source, is RELIABLE about one thing only: producing JUNK. no surprise that their article about the sinquefield cup event would be garbage as well. 2) here's what actually happened: (i repeat) "magnus FREQUENTLY plays inferior openings, even at the highest level, expecting to outplay his opponents. this almost always works" this has been fully documented, although never summarized as i do here. in the case of this game, hans did not succumb. magnus rage quit the tournament. over the course of the next few days, magnus made a number of public statements that COULD be interpreted as accusing hans of some form of misconduct, but if you examine what he said carefully, he NEVER actually accused hans of cheating, at least not in any legal (i.e. actionable) sense. during this time, it became PUBLIC knowledge (what had been well known in the chess community) that hans WAS a long-time cheater in other venues. so, when magnus said "hans is a known cheater", this is NOT an "accusation". it is a statement of FACT. but at no time did magnus say "hans cheated in OUR game", or even anything close to that. that distinction is critical. much more happened in this case. magnus quit a later tournament when paired against hans, and was fined for misconduct. hans was banned from various events. hans filed a completely frivolous lawsuit against magnus and a bunch of other entities, which suit was immediately tossed out as soon as a judge looked at it. hans has been reinstated for most purposes, and is playing at a very high level, but also makes rather gross blunders. magnus and hans are likely going to meet over the board in a few days. stay tuned. 3) magnus DID engage in misconduct. i am aware of this, and what i wrote previously INDICATES it. and so does hans ... LOTS of misconduct. but overall, magnus IS a genuinely nice person, with certain blemishes. hans IS a fundamentally NASTY person, and it comes out quite frequently. there is a mountain of evidence supporting everything i have said here, and i have studied much of it. if you wish any further clarification, just ask. 4) if you inspect what i wrote carefully, i trust you will find that there are NO grammatical errors. i hope you will not be too upset about my choice of using CAPITALIZATION. 5) i don't normally do this, but here it seems necessary: THANK YOU FOR YOUR KIND WORDS.

@@victorfinberg8595 Well, I read your entire comment. I must say, I admire your fighting spirit, and you gave me some things to think about. I'm sorry your first rant disappeared. It really sucks when that happens. RU-vid seems to be getting harder to understand every day. I suspect I could find a grammatical error beyond the odd capitalization in your replacement rant. Even the smartest people usually make such mistakes. But... It's the logic, facts, and heart that matter anyway, and I only mentioned the issue the first time because my hackles had been raised -- & they are down now. Good luck in life, my feisty friend! It's been weirdly fun. And I'll remember this little comment section joust for a long time! 👍

You're an embarrassment in thinking Hans cheated this particular game!

Hans did not cheat.