totally inappropriate response from Bev. she totally disregarded his legitimate concern and had the nerve to scoff at Yanetti and scold Karen. then an hour later “understands Jackson’s concern” and comes out with a revised form. she’s letting her personal vendetta of the defense team get in the way of Karen’s right to a fair trial
She has someone, and I'm not sure if that's other judges or someone that she's taking counsel with.... I think they agreed with Jackson that this would be grounds for appeal.... I think that is why she changed it..... Had this case not gotten the public spotlight that it has been getting I don't think she would have change it
Why can’t Karen shake her head & “laugh” over how unbelieveable Bev is being when her lifes @ stake?! It’s the face of being continually shocked by the bias, and calling Karen out was in bad taste. Just goes to show her resentment towards KR by Bev admonishing her for having a human reaction.
The world is watching Auntie Bev. I'm calling it now and saying someone called her after this despicable display from her and told her to add it to the form. Shame on you, Auntie Bev.
@@Jack-bc5xg She wasn't "laughing" because she found it funny. Her face and expressions were an accurate reaction from any human being that knows another person sounds ridiculous.
Judges always want to side with law enforcement especially if the victim themselves didn't commit a crime. They rely on the police for them being elected as judges. There was the cash for kids scandal in luzerne county years ago and the one cop choke slammed his own son for testifying against judge Conahan.
So the judge chuckles when the second attorney corrects her, saying “he hasn’t seen a slip like this”. But then Karen laughs and the judge becomes disgruntled and ends the conversation?
@@Charliepatch1978 exactly what she intended and exactly what she got! Nevermind the fact the jury did EXACTLY AS SHE INSTRUCTED THEM TO by not touching the verdict sheet until they were unanimous on ALL charges
This judge's impartiality is questionable. Her handling of objections. Her disrespect for the defendant. And the verdict slip needs to be appropriate to this specific case, not just standard wording.
@@Jack-bc5xg Dude you're an older guy who's subscribed to family vlog channels. Of course someone who partakes in watching children being filmed all day thinks that Corrupt Cannone is a good judge.
Not guilty for me. Hate this judge . So Bias . This is not a fair trial. I really hope she is found not guilty and all those horrible people pay for what they did and i hope lally never has a good nights sleep for a long long time .
Naw, HE ain't... That Bad Azz (shut yo' mouth) Atty, is 3,000 miles from home, sponsored by other defense atty (2 different law firms working, togther) *Jackson is Hollywood Heavy Hitter* That's why everybody was making a big deal about Read, having two law firms working on her case & then there is lally~gag solo, having to do everything by his lonesome... boo~hoo boo~hoo 😢 oh, welp...he shouldn't have ever brought this, case in the first place, lally~gag has bitten off way much more than he could never chew...
I’ve been saying this overly exaggerated judge is extremely bias towards Ms Read and takes shots at the defense every chance she got to do so! Horrible this woman is clearly not guilty. And WTH do u mean not guilty isn’t an option she needs to be under investigation as a poor unjustifiable excuse of a judge
I have watched the Judge and anytime the defense objects she immediately overrules them. When the Prosecutor objects she sustains them. It seems like she has really tied the defense hands by not allowing the attorney or their witness to testify. They basically are only allowed half of what they would have said. Definitely seems fishy.
@@user-rx8tw9vn9m I'm still confused on why this even made it to trial. Given the fact that all the evidence points toward the Albert's and Mccabe's families.😂
IMO Judges Bev is biased towards the prosecution and she wants the jury to return with all guilty verdicts. Bev has a poor attitude, she's dismissive, rude, corrupt, and she should be removed from the bench.
TIP for everyone: NEVER go to Canton, dont drive through there, dont visit. Drive completely AROUND that state if you are travelling! Most corrupt BS I've ever seen. If you drive through that town and get stopped by one of their corrupt cops you'll go in front of "judge Beverage" and be thrown in jail for murder! 😂😂
She cuts off Mr Jackson to admonish ms read for laughing even though she herself laughed just a few seconds before. She then threw a fit and left her own courtroom without hearing Mr Jackson further
Regarding the timeline: the Albert home was unsecured and unguarded as a crime scene over the weeks evidence was found by CERT. ALSO, BETWEEN4:16 PICKUP OF HER SUV AND ARRIVAL MANY MILES AWAY AT CANTON PD, TROOPER PROCTOR COULD HAVE DONE ANYTHING HE WANTED TO THE TAILLIGHT, WHICH IS POSSIBLY WHY THE VIDEO OF ITS CONDITION AND THE VIDEO OF ITS ARRIVAL HAVE GONE MISSING AND WHY THE TAPE WAS INVERTED. The tow driver could have stopped along the way, even just a block away from Karen's parents' house and done whatever he wanted, palmed it off to someone who went to 43 Fairview and tried to stage a debris field. Trooper Paul was incoherent on what the location of the pieces could mean.
Who designed that form? Why not just have "NOT GUILTY" options to go with "GUILTY", that way both options are treated equally by the form & nobody could argue that the form is leading jurors to either finding.
She backed into her bf and killed him? This is no joke. I know her"fans" ,and herself think this is a joke? But a good man died? At her expense. If the jury doesn't sentence her? God will. Believe that.
You think it's funny ms read? Like wtf it's her life on the line. She allowed to have emotions. At this point and being railroaded in the first place. I'd laugh too. Like come on judge...ms bev.
@@ringring6618I do those kinds of laughs when I deal with preposterous behavior, it’s more of a scoff. And if my life was on the line for it I am sure I would have some very strong emotions that would be hard to hide. Especially since being a 3rd party watching this case I feel this judge has been biased since the beginning. I came into this case not knowing anything about it. Never even saw a headline.
Verdict slip needs to be completely straightforward and crystal clear. The answer choices should be consistent throughout. It doesn't matter if that's what is or what has been used.
9 hours is nothing, especially given the length of the trial and the seriousness of the charges. just need to be patient. they have to do their due diligence regardless if they all agreed at the onset
She knew Karen was (rightfully) laughing at her poor excuse (that's the way it's always been). You could either laugh or throw a chair at her I guess. Fortunately the old dragon finally came to her senses.
The judge is cohorts with the police. She asked one lawyer if he's seen sheets like that and he said no then she said I disagree with you. So she knows what this man doesn't know about himself? If you assume someone is lying it's cause that's what u do
No wonder Karen Reed laughed, she realizes the fix is in, lol. It's not just one little thing here or there, it's the unsurmountable amount of "little things" the judge does to tip the scales that's already tipped against KR on top of that by the prosecutor, state witnesses, AND the corrupt police department. I'd be laughing too after hearing the judge stack the deck against her YET AGAIN!
Problem is Karen has shown inappropriate behavior through the whole trial. This isn't a laughing matter when u are being charged with murder but obviously Karen finds the court proceedings amusing??😮😮
@@lizdahl847 so your upset with her smiling, after hearing the police went through her phone looking for nude photos of here, selling her a @unt, and all sort of bad names. Why blame her?
I hope someone challenges her “that’s how we do things” on her decisions. That Jury slip was basically, Is she guilty or is she guilty. She takes the defense for fools and her jealousy seems to show when it comes to Karen Read.
She is simply stating that this verdict form has used for EVERY other case. Why change it for THIS case. I will say, however, that Jackson does seem to have a point.
When Jackson came he figured out the other courtroom doesn’t allow for the defendant to look at the witnesses! The witness box is in a peculiar place, no air conditioning, there was no Wi-Fi 🤦🏻♀️and they are still doing in-proper jury forms ! Please get up to date Court house it’s embarrassing! Thank you Attorney Alan Jackson for speaking out ! 🩷🩷🤟🏼🤟🏼Free Karen Read !
First off why didn’t Jackson see the form before it went to the jury? Second why didn’t the judge go over the form after closing arguments? Third Bev came in hot and was pissed to be called out, she should of not talked to Karen like that on the record
Bev mocking Yannetti with smirking and laughing at him FIRST and then scolding Karen who was laughing in disbelief of Bev’s unprofessionalism. 🤌🤌 This judge thinks people are blind. Not just Karen..whole world is watching and laughing 😂😂🎉
Judge is condescending. There’s a ton of people in Massachusetts like that, I couldn’t tell you how many doctors I encountered with that same dismissive attitude when I lived there…
She gets mad that Read is laughing at her, trying to fix the verdict to favor the DA. Read knows already that they couldn't prove their case, and now the judge is making it so that the jury make the mistake to find Read guilty.
I've never heard of anything so ridiculous. No option of Not Guilty for all charges? How is that legal? If there isn't a not guilty option, the only option is guilty of one of the charges. That's madness. Never mind a jury slip that sounds like it's been written up by a hungover student. What the actual ... is going on in this court??
@gerttopmuller that's not how it appeared on the jury slip. It looked like the Not Guilty option related only to the Murder charge. The other guilty charges were indented underneath the Murder charge and if I were on the jury seeing that, that's what I would think. Remember, the jury don't see and don't hear what we do, only what's put in front of them.
Given that this is being broadcasted nationally, the judge’s behavior is ridiculous. Her ego and conduct are concerning, especially considering how she might act in cases not under public scrutiny. She comes across as unprofessional, rocking in her chair, breathing loudly into the microphone, and sighing when she disagrees with the defense. Laughing and smiling during a case where someone’s life is at stake is absolutely unacceptable.
I’d heard people say she was pro prosecution/anti defense but it wasn’t until I saw this mess that it was very clear. I remember my mouth dropping when I heard about the verdict form. Wth is her problem?
I think the Judge is too fast to say no to something that seems like the way things should be... Exactly how it always is in Massachusetts, lol ... think we have seen in this case how things are in Massachusetts.
What I don't understand is why that judge is on this case isn't she the aunt of the Albert's or something like that or she's the aunt of someone in this case a cop the DA one of them.. PRAYING FREE KAREN READ JUSTICE FOR JOHN O.. ❤
AUNT BEV IS OUT OF HER WHEEL HOUSE.. AS DEMONSTRATD BY HER LATER CRAB WALKING INTO THE COURTROOM TO NOT ONLY CHANGE THE VERDICT FORM BUT TO WRITE ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS TO THE JURY.