Accused slain cop's girlfriend maintains innocence | Nightline 

This is beautiful to hear ❤️ praying that John gets Justice somehow in all this mess that has been made

Have they asked you to be a character witness for her ? You should be. She needs all the help she can get. This case is so incredibly frustrating how important evidence was mishandled, thrown into red solo cups you drink in, put into stop and shop bags, and not into evidence marked bags. Someone could spend the rest of their life in jail for something they didn’t do. It’s just insane and sad that this is how they did their “investigation”

Lol she only decided she didn't hit him a year later...she did it and she's knows she did....

​@@Tuesdaysdeadna Bang Bang Colin did.

💜💫 FREE KAREN READ 💫💜

Yes...por kids. Seems like there's a curse in their lives

And now also their uncle's girlfriend in jail and she was also a parental figure to the kids

@@m.g.7828she’s not in jail she’s been out on bond

@@Tammy_26Irwin accused of murdering their uncle, just as traumatic

Wow! She opened up the worms in her drunken life and Jealousy including her having slept with his friend!!

But the feds are dirty too!

If they had anything that would exonerate her, she wouldn't be on trial.

@@ElleJ-kx4hu there’s lots of exculpatory evidence that’s been hidden! The DA is in cahoots with the crooked cops. This is not new and blatantly obvious.

@@ElleJ-kx4huthey’re still investigating. The last twitter update from FBI agent that I saw on twitter said as much. I’ve heard that they had an initial hearing where they made clear their experts opinions on both self phone data (google search) as well as manner of death. Judge ruled that the FBI trial and findings cannot be used in this trial.

The MA state police are investigating. The FBI helped in certain areas.

How so? Because he’s doing his job arguing the evidence does not support Karen Reads creative defense stories?

@@cateellington4081 he hasnt done that at all. are you handicapped

He's also trying to shield them with office Victim's Advocate. They are witnessess.

Witnesses to what though?

@@cateellington4081 His "unprecedented" statement had no less than 5 outright lies and 3 completely inappropriate statements.

Exactly.

They were invited in the house for drinks! People are too quick to judge! They have to know the whole story to make a judgement. She is bold and carefully presenting herself; while her body language is not coordinating with her words. She already said, she dated him in the past. He called her / message her as blast from the past. What if he wanted to leave her again? there wasn't anything substantial he found in her; she is all over him in those pictures. She took care of his niece and nephew. Those things can give her entitlement issues. she went on and blamed the entire police department for it. There is a simple rule when you go to party or dinner together, you leave together. In her madness, she may have hit him in the snow and left him there to die; later fabricated a plan to blame entire police department.

That is suspicious

@@MineMeMineMeMineMe I agree with your statement. She 'allegedly' took care of the children. If this in fact happened - there's been (most likely) a mutually beneficial arrangement between both parties. From my pov, her body language describes her as a very attention hungry, domineering, vengeful individual. He seemed to be more of a subdued individual.

I don’t believe in body language to the extent that a couple of you seemingly do. There’s certain times it can be helpful, and many times is interesting. But I will tell you that there’s been times, For example, that I have shook my head no when I verbally said yes, or vice versa. And I was literally just talking out loud to myself. I do that a lot. If I saw someone do that I would be suspicious they were lying. But my case I was answering questions along with some video or some thing, and I thought they were going to ask the question in the opposite way which would’ve made my answer yes, but they ask the differently which meant to be truthful I had to say no. But if you all were watching my body language you would be convinced I would lying. I also think that people usually are mostly projecting confirmation bias when they look at body language. Maybe you’ve already made up your mind with other information you know about this case and so when you get new information it still doesn’t change your mind. I’ve done the same thing. That’s why they tell members of the jury not to State their opinion, because once you state your opinion it’s harder to change your mind later. Or maybe you know a woman or man, or the situation at hand, they remind you of some thing that happened in your past, so you’re more likely to be on one side or the other. And then subconsciously you look for ways to validate how you already felt either about this woman or the situation from your past. But people don’t realize they are doing it.

I think the prosecution must be alleging Karen Read’s car has claws and teeth…😂😂😂

And bitten by the dog the owners of the house no longer have...

@@teemyoutube2066 💨🐕💨

Especially at 5 mph. Lmao

Sloppy coverup. More like a panic alert.

There’s no way that you could possibly know that because you don’t know anything about accident reconstruction. I really find it laughable when random people say things like this when there’s LITERALLY NO WAY you can determine that from watching a video about a case.

​@@DarkAngel71180 well I am in accident reconstruction and with the amount of snow that was on the street its physically impossible to leave those kinda marks on him with nothing wrong with her car, she would have some damage. We all saw the video of when she hit John's car that she had minimal damage. Those injuries on his arm are from Chloe

@@DarkAngel71180it’s called common sense

​@@tatertotter808Exactly 🎯 #FreeKarenRead 🙏 #JusticeForJohnOkeefe

See what the Feds have found out and the autopsy report will hopefully shed light. Trying to remain impartial until the end of the case

Yes! How did Julie Albert know at 4:55 am he died when his body wasn’t discovered until 6 am. It’s so obvious any comment on this saying she is guilty is either one of them or someone who just watched this interview and hasn’t heard of this case yet.

that would be Jenn McCabe who did that

@@StephanieL.-rs2ulshe also googled it at 2:27 am and thought deleting it would make It go away🤦‍♀️

But didn't Karen call her to help her look for him around this same time? Does it not make sense that she would be google that then if they think he's out in the cold without a coat like Karen says? And why did Karen not go directly back to the house she dropped him off at? Does that make sense to you? And why would she need a couple of people to help her look for him? Did she need a couple of witnesses for when the body was found? "Oh, I must have hit him by mistake."

@@Paul-cj1wb nope. Jen McCabe googled it at 2:27 am and Karen called her a little before 5 am. Also look at Julie Alberts police statement she told them she received a call from Jen McCabe at 4:55 am telling her that “Johnny was dying” the reason is because they did it and are framing Karen.

Jenn McCabe is the leader of this cover up I believe.

Are you a forensic expert? Why can't Karen hire someone to do an independent autopsy on John's body?

​@@dylandice4638It doesn't take an expert to research the extensive amount of evidence that proves Karen's innocence.

​@@dylandice4638The prosecution has failed to release a ton of stuff to the defense. Do your research.

And from whom do you have all this evidence from? The defense? And didn't Karen call this Jen McCabe to help her look for him? Would she not be googling that if they think he's out in the cold some place? And why would Karen call a couple of people to "help her look for him," around the neighborhood rather than she herself first going directly back to the house she had dropped him off at? Did she need a couple of witnesses for when the body was found? "Oh, I must have hit him by mistake." The injuries mentioned could have happened if a plow is out there plowing and the body is hidden by snow. A snow plow is very heavy and jagged from stones and other materials on roads and leaves scratches all over. Just look at a speed bump on a road that is regularly plowed and you can see them for yourself.

@@InLieuTubeit’s not cops and friends kill him in the house it’s a small group of friends and one happens to be a very well connected Boston Cop. From here he contacts all of his connections so the first cops to arrive to the scene are his friends. The lead detective on this case Michael Proctor is a long time family friend so he immediately went to work helping them to cover it up. The neighbor directly across the street (who just so happens to be the ex chief of canton police) had a ring camera set up which would perfectly capture Brian alberts entire front yard/ house claimed his ring camera picked nothing up. He was coincidentally also good friends with Brian Albert. It should have picked up whatever happened whether it was Canton Cover Up Crew or Karen. If they had ring footage of Karen running him over obviously they would give it up. Proctor never sought this footage. He took the guys words for it. They didn’t ask any other neighbor for their ring camera footage and they deleted 2 minutes of the library camera footage that would have coincidentally exonerated Karen by showing that her taillight was in tact driving home from dropping him off. It sounds like a drama from a lifetime movie until you dig into the facts of the case and realize the connections and how deeply deeply corrupt these people are. Go to Turtleboy Daily News. He has over 100 blogs on this all of his information is well sourced and vetted and he brings all the receipts.

@@InLieuTubealso what they can’t answer is how every single witness left the house that night and failed to see a dead body. Or how the snow plow that drove by 3 times that night also said there was no body, he was found 12 feet from the road there’s no way to miss a 215 lb body laying in the front yard near the road.

@@InLieuTube So, based on what is known in this case, the theory of a Police cover up is laid out John O"Keefe had prior issues with Colin Albert, John goes to 34 Fairview, home to BPD Sgt Brian Albert (colins uncle), Karen drops him off then pulls forward to let vehicle there to pick up Julie Nagle pull in. At some point John is involved in a fight and later dumped on the lawn in vicinity of where Karen had pulled up. John has wounds to right eye, left side of nose, gash to back of his head, missing a sneaker. Inside the home was an ATF agent who works at Canton PD, another Albert also works at Canton PD. Investigating Officers never checked for ring camera footage from houses facing the way Karen drove, instead they looked in other direction. Footage from Canton Library ( 2 min worth) mysteriously missing. High ranking Canton cop lives across street yet his ring picked up nothing. A drunk ATF agent leaves the house and punches in at Canton PD , everyone named in reports are all related or life long friends! the Alberts make the dog disappear, rip up and replace cellar floor, and sold the house for below market value. oh, and how does a Police Sgt or any of his family NOT go outside to see wtf is going on???

​@@InLieuTubeother people addressed the ring camera footage. As for your point of why he was dumped on the front lawn. O'Keefe was killed in a fight, it wasn't planned or premeditated. Now if they make the body disappear, that house is the last place O'Keefe was scene. That house will be inspected for DNA and blood. So instead they dumped the body outside and used connections with the mass police to steer the investigation in another direction.

@@InLieuTube correct. To make it even worse, the eyewitnesses told Proctor which direction she left in and he interviewed several neighbors going in the opposite direction only to ensure he could write in the report he spoke to neighbors, but nobody’s cameras had anything. That’s one of the maddening and telling parts of all of this. Clearly nowadays everything is captured on peoples security cameras, its utterly impossible to get away with a crime. They couldn’t find one camera that captured anything? No way. But the footage would’ve exonerated her so they couldn’t have that.

I think you're absolutely right!

Do you seriously think they would leave him in their own yard? Give me a break!

@jane6989 YES, I absolutely think they'd leave him in their own yard. It would be way too hard to take him anywhere else, In their drunken state, they put him on the lawn. That way, they could say they had nothing to do with it. It obviously worked in their favor as no one investigated inside of the house.

Nope

No wonder you guys ended up with trump as a president.. I feel really bad for the critical thinkers in your country...

She was hysterical. Anyone would be. Also those two snake women put that into her head.

Agree. And now she and this mob blaming the two women whom she woke from sleep in hysteria [or to help her fabricate an alibi?] is just absurd. I wonder though, did they actually check for a snow plow hit? Because the injuries do seem extreme unless he was crouched when it happened; maybe he had got out to take a leak and fell and was getting up when the tail end hit him. She may have not seen him there and 'in a black out' drove right kinda-like more into him or something. If she was in a black out, she could have thought she was stuck and rocked back and forth even. The entire thing is bizarre, a real mystery [where's Monk when you need him?] but I do not see the family and group, especially with Jenn & John's friendship and all the kids that were around, having anything to do with it. P.S. I'm commenting in May 2024.

@@govindagovindaji4662 Let me just say that Jen's testimony opens up a ton of doubts. Deleted messages and deleted search about "dying in the snow" way before the body was found. Also, I'm not a drinker but I wonder how a police cruiser and an ambulance have the sirens blazing in front of your house and you don't even look out the window (maybe I'm a light sleeper). I'm not saying they killed him, I just wonder why their testimonies are tuned into accusing Karen...May 2024 as well.

The fact he didn't return or say a word, duh. The fact he never stayed away from his niece and nephew another. My goodness look at the evidence. Have original thought processes.

@@mistyevans8160 Nobody knows to whom or even what you are addressing. Duhs aren't exactly communicative.

no coroner or expert would ever attribute the injuries to a slow moving car in a winter storm unless they are also corrupt

@@tkx7 slow moving? you got the exact speed or youre just making evidences?

EXACTLY! My knuckles would look the same after I got into fights in high school!

@@enzoinfinity1 24

@@enzoinfinity1well isnt the commonwealth saying she was going 24 mph in reverse when she hit him?

Good question 🤔

Watch the trial.

Because she probably wondered my God was I so drunk that I like lost it last night? She was hysterical and in that moment that's why when you're hysterical you are never reasonable. The fact is the FBI has already confirmed his injuries are not from a car or an suv. His injuries are two black eyes, cut to the nose, blunt force trauma to the back of the head, and dog attack lacerations all over his arm. He went in that home and never came out alive

Remember, she saw him approaching the door and then she left. He did not go inside yet so it's possible he could have walked back out towards her and while she was backing up to leave hit him. But she didn't know I'm just saying to answer your question this is her line of thinking while in hysterics and just finding her beloved murdered

If you watch the trial, she had a texting cheating relationship with one of the men in the house, which also explains why she didn't want to enter the house, and encouraged John to also not go " why are we going there, are we welcome" etc. She likely said, I caused this, because she was in an emotional affair with a man inside of that house.

What do you mean? I thought all Lexus’ came with teeth and claws on the back bumper 😂😂😂

@@mainejournalnews8737 that was only models produced in the 90’s. The modern day versions have elected to no longer have that commonly overlooked feature.

​@@mainejournalnews8737😂😂😂

Those are gentle German shepherd bites 😳 they usually can bite straight through into bone. Was he practice for her?

@@mainejournalnews8737 😅

Me either, i extensively go over this case on my channel. Filings, evidence ect. Small videos like this dont really tell ppl much.

Lmao. She couldn’t get a hold of him so she went home and went to bed…😂😂😂 Needs the death penalty

So he goes inside the apartment, she tries to call on his cell phone, he doesn’t answer and she drives home and goes to bed? This seems reasonable to you? This is so implausible as to be wholly unbelievable.

This is a very very biased interview

@@dkerr6449 first of all, what apartment are you even talking about? It’s obvious you don’t know the facts here 🤔

He was used as a punch bag and not by Karen read. She's INNOCENT.

She has the shiftiest eyes, they're darting all over the place.

It was a weak interview by ABC.

The cop already sold jis house , hus his assets, ready to go ""ON THE LAMB WITH ALL HIS BAGS OF DOPE HE GOT 4 FREE ,RAIDING GANG DEALERS.. THE SISTER IN LAW FRAMED HER WITH THE TAILIGHT AND GLASS EVIDENCE.. TJATS Y SHE WENT OVER TO HIS HOUSR.. KAREN WAS AT HIS JOUSE BCUZ HE DIDNT RESPOND TO Baby SITTER, so karen went ovrr there to relieve the sitter with the kids... after she hot thrm ready and off yo school, thoseb2 lying beatches showed up.. to frame her with evudense and tell cops that she said/ did things, to get the story rolling... tjst womanvwas protecting her husband and brother in law... karen said they r all family..

I agree they did a 9 minute show on this. So many more important things to bring up.

She’s the killer. Lol.

​@@stevenprice6957Tabloid reporter. Sensational news. 🙄

N u wouldn't search that if your friend was missing in tge cold. Plz stop, that is tge dumbest comment I seen. N there's alot, I would, if my friend was missing n I knew w time I saw him last I would search that, any normal person would. Defense reaching at straws.

⁠@@playarlz36lol okay that’s why the fbi just confirmed her google search

​@@playarlz36genius, can you offer a reasonable justifiable reason as to why she'd think he was dead??

@pistolpete8231 did she Google search he is dead. No idiot, she searched how long so they know how long they have to find him before he dies. God think before you respond, n every good person out there would do the same.

@playarlz36 hey pea brain...take about 5 minutes to SLOWLY re-read what I wrote. I simply asked why she'd THINK he was dead in the 1st place to get the idea to make that google search. Where did I say "she googled he was dead"? I'm not sure if it's the ketamine or meth, but you're not as smart as you think. There are many holes in this case and all indications lead to a cover-up...keep banging that keyboard though.

@@RationalNon-conformistyeah but wouldn’t they try to move his body further from the house then? Like closer to the road? It doesn’t make sense to just leave his body basically at their own lawn

Because she has drunk, hit him, and drove off.

@@realresident1890you an officer for canton PD?

Because she didn’t want to harm him in anyway. It’s a concern by a person that loves him.

I would have to have the same questions as you but at the same time I feel this lady Jen helped her idk somethings seems off about them but i have no doubt Karen participated because she just lied and said she had 4 drinks but it was proven from footage it was 7-9. Also why say did i hit him ? The fact you have to ask yourself that is scary

Naw!!!!

And prosecutors requested a gag order on the defense. Never happens that way - usually the other was around. Super shady

Where are you getting this info that someone googled that at 227am? Where is that an actual fact. I would love to know so I can see it. Not from an internet conspiracy theorist, but from actual phone or google record that can be admitted into evidence.

@@Paul-cj1wb celebrite data extraction from McCabes phone. There is a report submitted in the court docs

​@@Paul-cj1wbDude you need to keep up. If you haven't seen that then you're not paying attention.

It isn’t a fact that she did it at 2:27. You are just parroting what Turtleboy says. What the prosecution believes is that the browser session was opened at 2:27 and never closed until after she searched it at around 6am.

Don’t believe your lying eyes and ears 😜

@@superjuls69 100% injuries not caused by any car.

@@wishboneman right, don’t believe your lying eyes and ears

Excuse her for not being gentle and meek while fighting for her innocence and the truth of what happened, you must be a gentle angel

And Brian Albert is a dirty cop🤷🏾

Just because there’s broken plastic doesn’t mean it touched his skin. Plenty of documented cases where people get hit by cars and bruising, cuts and scraps under the clothing. If he was beaten his face has no broken nose, cheeks, jaw etc. Defensive wounds would be in his palms and fingers. He got hit then tumbled on pavement because of a belligerent drunk girlfriend.

He may have gotten bit by the dog first and then went outside and she hit him

Dozens of officers involved? There was less than a half dozen that processed the scene, and they all knew who's house it was, and many of them knew who the victim was. As for actually processing the crime scene they did a completely despicable job. Also worth noting the only evidence they found after all the officers searched the area that day was a peice of a clear pint glass. It wasn't until days later an officer happened to be driving by and saw his missing shoe, his missing hat, and over 40 pieces of red taillight. How do 6 police officers search an area and come up with just a piece of glass, but not all the other things which would be easily seen in contrast with the snow?

@@JoexWalsh Because everything was covered in a blizzard of snow and things were revealed as the snow melted. Don't you get it?

The officer's knew each other

@@dawnmills6755 Don't you wish all murders had such a competent, professional, and non-biased investigators?! Can't see over 40 pieces of red tail light in white snow, but can find it in the grass days later, under where his body would have been. She must of hit him so hard that the tail light fragments when right through him without causing any exit wounds! Incredible! You are awfully dense my friend 🤣

Have u watched the trial? I went in not knowing anything and I’m convinced there’s a bigger picture here.. the involvement of the people in that house is sketchy plus all the lies being caught on the stand by those people. Something not adding up

The other people at the bar have already testified they didn't think she was that intoxicated.

​@MissX905 the other people in the bar....who had been drinking

@@alisongladden1331 What on earth would convince you of that? There is nothing at all "sketchy" about the people in the house and no evidence has been adduced that there was some grand conspiracy. She was drunk and hit him.

@@milart12 I’ve done some research into the case after watching the first few days and just to name a few things, John was found with animal scratches on his arm - I saw the photos.. they got rid of their dog they had for 7 years after this incident. They ripped out their basement floor and sold the house at a loss. The son Colin had busted knuckles right after this went down hence why they all answer questions about Colin super fast and defensively. Another brother Tim Albert filled in his pool possibly burying evidence. The lead investigator knows all the ppl in the house very well and is under investigation himself. He searched for nudes while he had Karen’s phone in evidence. Also had her car for an hour alone and then magically the tail light pieces showed up at the scene where they weren’t before. Jen McCabe searched how long it takes for a body to die in snow, once at 2 am and again at 6 am. That’s just scratching the surface btw.

i agree

She’s fighting for her life, and the evidence absolutely doesn’t support the prosecution’s story. She doesn’t have to cry on television ffs

@@Tamara-id1pe It's not normal. She has no trouble laughing and smiling though.

@@Tamara-id1pe She has no trouble laughing and smiling though. It isn't normal.

@@eyesonheaven4765 it is “normal”, proven by how humans have vastly different ways of reacting to things. I would be laughing and smiling as well if I was innocent and listening to bizarre absurdities from these “witnesses”. This is why evidence is so crucial in trial because “weird behavior” doesn’t tell us anything

Yes, she did. She told the interviewer in this video she had four drinks.

She is so guilty, No one could could see the Officer in the snow, logical, no fighting in the house!! Calling all those people proved nothing. Some happened from the bar to the house between the 2 of them. Can't stand mouth, she also snear. GUILTY!

​@pennicochrane8886 lol wait until the defense brings in all the evidence FROM THE FBI who has been investigating the frame job by dirty cops and MSP for over 2 years.

Agree 100%

@@pennicochrane8886 Any chance we can explain how he got a black eye....from being hit on his arm by her car, at what would be less than 10 miles per hour?

@@glorygoma7182 Will leave it up to the Coroner to decide how it happened. Defense wants to blame the dog also. Defence is all over the place!!!

Do you still think this?

The data shows it was searched at the time the body was found. That will be shown in court. The defence are making it up as they go. They are doing a trial by media.

evidence says NG

I don’t know. Evidence seems to point to her. I need to see the trial.

You kind of made a contradiction, if she was drunk and doesn’t remember, she definitely is filled with regret! Because she is sober now! She’s pissed! She cannot even grieve properly! I’d be pissed! And normally you don’t have defendants speak to the public. Also, we don’t know how many drinks she has had, pure speculation, they were also bar hopping, it wasn’t like the bartender at one bar counted the drinks, because she was BAR HOPPING. She is making sure Justice is served.

I've suffer a lot of lost in my life. It still makes me very sad at times. But I can tell people the stories without getting emotional or visibly sad.

​@@JAJJABLOG No, it's you who are making contradictory statements. She "is filled with regret" and "she is pissed!" If she was BAR HOPPING, she had A LOT OF DRINKS! Probably to avoid being cut off.

@@priscillamichel4797very true. My some died in 2017. For years I couldn’t even talk about him without falling apart. Now, I’ve trained myself to block out all thoughts and emotions. People are so ridiculous judging other based only on their reactions. We are all different!!

Because she's a liar?

Its nervous mutterings of someone that just found their loved one dead and she was also drunk. The evidence speaks for itself and if you can't see that then you are just as horrible as the ones covering his unfortunate murder.

Because Jen put an earworm in her mind, and Karen was in shock and desperately trying to make sense of how it happened. Most people don't immediately jump to "his friends murdered him and dumped his body"; they think it must have been a horrible accident first even if it doesn't make sense.

People say all sorts of things when they're in shock. Use your brain, man.

Thank you

She’s a liar look her evil eyes

Totally agree!

but what

Or the multiple people who left the party around 1:30am or Matt McCabe looking out the window to see tire tracks but not a 200lb dying man

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-XzRRNcStm4k.htmlsi=lKIza03kHjDXJM2c

Why can’t anyone spell how anymore ????? It’s a lost art I guess

​@@THEBIGLIE20forgive me for my ignorance, my English is not the best. But may I ask what you are talking about? Or what you mean by your comment?

@@THEBIGLIE20 they do this because that is how Jen McCabe typed “How long to die in cold” to do her Google search at 227am several hours before John O’Keefe was found dead outside on Boston cop, Brian Albert’s front lawn. It was obviously a typo at the time but I think we all know exactly what she meant and that she was searching for this answer during the making of the plan to cover up the murder.

The whole thing about the Google search may be a technical glitch based on what I saw on court TV.b

​@@iMatti00yep

@@iMatti00 “May be a technical glitch”. Lemme guess….Coffinduper?

@@estrella5935ding, ding, ding. JC has been proven to be a mouthpiece for the prosecution. If the state has a poor enough case to enlist her, they should be charged!!!!

When I say I've only had 4 drinks I'm usually 10 drinks in tbh

Vehicle did not cause those injuries.

This whole crowd are heavy drinkers. She stuttered in the interview and said she had about 4 drinks. And her response did appear to be based on drinks at the Waterfall. Prior to there, she was at another nearby bar and several people testified that she bought in a cocktail glass from the other bar. You don't do a move like that with only 1 drink in you; that's something someone would do after a couple of drinks. So in the course of say 4 hours of being out at bars, it's very possible she had a total of 8 to 9 drinks. So definitely not sober and not thinking totally straight.

looks guilty.....? WOW!!!!!!!!!

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

She was frantic. Questioning herself! Couldn’t imagine what happened. She was brainstorming. You never said to yiurself “did I lock the door?” “Where’s my phone?” Did I put clothes in dryer!??

she seems excessively focused and shes putting her finger above her lip like that. i say shes guilty idk

@@amybeth9416💯✅

Four strong drinks is a lot for a 120 pound woman….

I think she knew she hit him and went home in a panic waited a few hours then called friends to help her “ find” him. She took them straight to the body! Otherwise she would have just gone home and passed out from all the alcohol. I think she’s very clever

@@StephSilva-qw1lm that would be a good conclusion to reach if it was for the evidence that shows that the injuries to his body are in no way consistent with getting hit by a car. In the trial right now the defense has an expert medical examiner who has done thousands of autopsies and he is going to testify that his injuries are in no way consistent with a car accident. We can speculate all we want but that is kind of a huge plot hole. Even before this I thought, if he was hit by a car you would expect he abdomen to be bruised, ribs broken, pelvis broken, legs broken or injuries, basically places where a bumper (which is the first point of contact when a car backs into something) would hit someone. Instead we see no injuries on his lower body or abdomen and an injury on his arm and head.

She didn’t “leave him”, the agreement was that he would text her when he got inside, he never texted her so she just left. Kind of different than straight up leaving someone. She didn’t go home and just start calling either, she called once the early hours of the morning came and she figured he should be back by then. She might be lying about the alchohol she drunk but why wouldn’t she? The alcohol is the only thing that causes some doubt in this situation but that’s only excluding all of the evidence that works in her favor and the medical examiner testifying that his injuries in no way correlate to a car accident.

I guess we will see when ME takes the stand

I think that drink limit on Read is here say. There was no blood test on Karen Read. Your perception is on information that was never confirmed. You’re ok with that? Was your son’s killer checked for this? If so, that is why you know. Don’t take your personal incident and plaster it on this one. You have no idea what the truth is here.

BTW, my brother died from alcohol poisoning at 27. I kinda of have an idea what alcohol can do to a family.

You haven’t looked at all at the facts of this case. This couldn’t be further from the truth and is completely inaccurate…I suggest you watch the trial…

I agree about the drunk driving…it is so irresponsible and can endanger others lives as well as their own. Nothing good happens with excessive drinking. I’m so sorry about your son. Drunk driving is horrible!

Agreed on drunk driving but doesn't make her a murderer. I am so sorry about your son. But please don't let that be a veil to let you not see the truth of this obvious cover up.

YOU HAVE NOT SEEN THE EVIDENCE IN CONTEXT.

The trial is still happening. I have not seen all of the evidence yet.

def 1000% NG

Exactly

That’s the part I don’t get and find hard to believe.

It was her boyfriend, not her husband or a child.

He wanted to go to the party, she didn't. She dropped him off there and went home.

@@pistolpete8231 He was 46 years old and he was invited in a bar to come over to Brian Alberts house but they didn't ask her explicitly, so Karen was not sure it was an extended invitation so that was the reason she drove off .. still hoping he called her to say he you are invited too so she was a bit frustrated about this too.. It's not nice to have to go home alone after an evening out!

They gave the library video and guess what was missing? Two minutes of the video somehow disappeared. The two minute time frame that Karen would have been driving by with a tail light that wasn’t broken yet and would prove her innocence. Absolutely absurd case. They are all going down though the Feds are was too involved now.

@@Alienspecies635how did the feds get involved? It seems like they’re all trying to protect their own

Please explain what the library video is? I need to catch up.

​@@slaws2279it would show it being towed with brake light intact, which another video did but John Procter apparently broke tail light and scattered this at the scene because then poof it was discovered.

@@keli449ohhh interesting. Thanks.

Dog bites are puncture wounds not straight lacerations

@@StephSilva-qw1lm and there are no less than 20 puncture wounds on his right arm

They were all friends!!! There is absolutely no reason for them to kill him! The defence is doing a good job of convincing you and others. She is Shrewd and a tough cookie! He has nothing rlse

He has nothing else to use Except the calls.

Where else would they put his body?? That’s actually a good way to get away with murder by saying he got hit by a car.

@@RationalNon-conformist- well not ten feet from the house they were partying in!! But being it was a house full of cops you would think they could come up with a better conspiracy than that!

wats her relationship with the attorney, all this “lateral” stuff is makin my head hurt

Lol I know!!

Why gather evidence in a used grocery bag and red solo cups? The real culprits ARE idiots.

Corruption all around!!!

Especially since the people in the house were with him the night before and were all friends.. the cops that showed up that morning knew this because they’re in the friend group! Something doesn’t sit right about it!

Interesting point. I haven't read anyone else asking this question. KR was arrested a few days later without the police doing a full investigation.

The cops went in the house and interviewed the homeowners the morning John was found.

@@dawnmills6755 please educate yourself before making a comment. The home was not searched. A conversation in the foyer with good boy Officer Lank lifelong friend is not due diligence in a murder investigation. The entire property was a crime scene, and was NOT treated as such. Witnesses were not separated, the scene was not secured, evidence was not preserved, interviews were not recorded, the house was not searched, the camera used to take the photos of the front lawn was lost, witnesses names were intentionally spelled wrong/left out of the police report, red solo cups were used to collect blood, a leaf blower was used to blow snow around…

Who is Turtleboy? This "non sense" is coming from EVIDENCE SUBMITTED TO THE COURT...Why is Brian Alberts AUNT THE JUDGE IN THE CASE?

Let’s wait for the proof of when that was googled and by whom - at least if the time is not accurate, it could have been googled to work out how long he’d been lying there before being ‘found’ ….

Why you ask. ? Good question. Many witnesses have stated that Karen Read said to them, someone search how long does it take etc. this is while she is on top of the body. You’ll actually see that this is the fact of the matter. There’s a lot of made up garbage coming from her team. They have support so they are going with it. She admits to hitting him twice in the early stages. She admits after that to not remembering anything because she was too drunk. Now she remembers everything haha. Yeah right. Psycho woman

his phone data says different

She got up because she knew she hit him with the vehicle.

Because she called him and he didn’t answer. She was worried. Moreover she dropped him off around 12am, late but acceptable for an after party. She woke up having not heard from him at all around 3am, excessively late to still be at someone’s house-these are 40+ year olds not frat kids.

How did she expect him to get home? She said that she waited while he walked up to a side door and because he didn’t call her she burn off and went home. They were supposed to be going over there together that doesn’t make sense. You can get all scuffed up from falling down on the ground, I have scars to prove it. If you hit with a car, you can get scratched up by the ground, depending on how it hits you yeah you can mess up your face. I have seen it. Her whole story doesn’t make sense and I just started following the trial.

@@TwistedTalesofTrueCrimethey live less than 3miles from the house. He’s a grownup, I’m sure she assumed he’d Uber or get a ride. I’d never expect my grown ass man to spend the night at another persons house when we live right down the street. Also he was found on the grass. She drives a huge Lexus SUV, he had no mid body damage, his eyes were blacked, swollen, knuckles bruised, a gash in the top of his head and his arm had not abrasions but deep cuts/marks…have you seen the scene? No way she hit him and caused those injuries on a man over 6ft tall with that car in that location…impossible

@@DamnitDana I was unaware of all those bruises. Especially on his knuckles this strange. I would expect bruises maybe on one side and if he kind of rolled over or something like that. I can see someone being hit and then crawling to the side, but those bruises are questionable. Especially the location. I’m going to continue to observe the trial. I’m glad that I had no real exposure before this. That way I can assess it from fresh eyes. Thank you for sharing.

I understand what you’re saying, but the injuries that he has they do not consist. getting hit by a vehicle.

Jen McCabe never took a polygraph stupid. She did Google "how long to die in cold" at 227 AM though.

Would you go look for your boyfriend if he had not returned yet.

Ide be passed out from all the drinking

She woke up at 5 call her friends looking for John who does that ? He’s not a kid he could crush at the friends house, why she was so worried about him ? Because She’s left him to die after hitting him and she knows it!!!

I’m watching the trial now, and John Okeefe was not actually friends with the Alberts. Which is why Karen was confused about going to their house after leaving the bar

Because he wasn’t returning her texts and didn’t come home.

Funny, because her body language says she is a liar.

I think she did it 😅

@@billythekidder7182body language is pseudo science clown

@@billythekidder7182 No it doesn't. Where's you get this, one of the RU-vid resident "Body Language Expert" channels? One of the biggest content scams going. Event the self proclaimed 'experts' can't say for sure that their made-up signs actually mean someone is lying or being deceptive. Get a grip on reality.

She did it and ya'll are stupid

Agree with your points, but I also wonder how he got a black eye, and nobody saw a human lying down in 1 or 2 inches of snow, and testimonies from other guests of no tail light damages from her car. How about cops at the scene who found "only few pieces of tail light glass", saw her car and never looked for other pieces until the snow melted later on? I will the investigation looks very shaky and leaves plenty of doubts. Let's not mention deleted messages and search from JEN's phone.

FBI confirmed just that..........car didn't hit him and he didn't hit the car.........case closed

@@bobbyswain7049 no they didn't if that had happened in a place called reality and not just in your fantasy world then the trial wouldn't have happened..Karen hit him.....case closed.

Stinke...

You don’t know that.

@555KR • Framed by who? For what reasons? On what grounds? Nah she just thinks she can outsmart the system. 👎

She will be charged

6:02 sure... free kArEn lol. So much wrong with this presentation of the circumstances.

@@DEUTSCHLAND.007 Framed by the police officers who killed him. You should look into the case some more. There was A LOT of exonerating evidence that was left out of this video.

@@korbendallas7181 The is 0% chance she'll be convicted if it goes to trial.

A dog attack would leave more injuries than that - the tyre of a heavy vehicle driven over his arm could make such creases of the skin.

Coincidentally they got a youth nothing next day. Their officers they know exactly how to get rid of evidence

Apparently you haven't been paying attention to the case. She hit John's car backing out of the driveway. There's video that proves it. She never said she had 9 drinks and they absolutely do not have her on video drinking nine drinks you just made that up 😂 BAC level of .13 % is like 4 drinks if that If you think she's guilty you are either ignorant or related to them.

Also , there’s no reason for her to be so vindictive by saying “in his drunkenness”. She was likely drunk too at the time . She’s bizarre but very savvy in concocting this police coverup conspiracy to muddy the waters. I do think the second degree murder charges are ridiculous though and only brought forward because he’s a cop

He wasn’t run over, but that is what would have happened if she backed into him. He definitely wouldn’t be launched 12 feet uphill without any injury to where that SUV would have hit him. Then explain the bruised knuckles, bulging black eyes, head lac, and dog bites on his arm.

She drove to the house and saw him in the snow

@@007bboxshe knew exactly where he was lol

I think because she called Jen, who was at the party and a friend of John’s, who stated he never showed up. Double check though. I listen to the trial every time they are in court and yet still seem to zone out and miss parts🤣

@@QueenofKings-mh7zn I just feel, the red flags from the start are, if you were dropping someone off at the get together, you’d either go in with them (unless there was an argument), or, you’d set up a time to pick them back up since he didn’t have a car to go home with. Plus, she knew where he was. You’d not wake up screaming that he wasn’t home yet. (Again) how would he get home without a car or a ride home? If I wasn’t getting him on his phone, I’d assume he was passed out on their sofa and wasn’t hearing it. I sure wouldn’t be calling Jen screaming bloody murder, I’d call her to get their phone number, or have Jen call them and ask them to have him call. After that, and then finding out he wasn’t there and he never came in, THAT is the time to panic, not before. She obviously knew she ran over him by stating (or even assuming) it. She went straight to him in the snow. He was so covered up (3-4 inches of snow), and being dark outside, there is no way she’d initially see him. I simply can’t believe alllllll of those people would be taking up for a teenager that supposedly hit him, or something. There’s just no way THAT many of them would. Maybe a few (the owners of the house and the brother), but not all. Maybe she didn’t hit him intentionally, but she 100% did. People say there’s no way he could have black eyes and scratches, but he could have been bending over by the taillight and bumper or wheel, or already fallen and was stumbling back up and hit because he was drunk and it was slick from the weather. Or, being mad and wanting out of the relationship, she could have intentionally hit him, people do all of the time. The courts are full of them. I think she realized he was using her to take care of his children as a babysitter, and she was already moving on to the new guy she was texting. She left him there to die, then headed home to come up with an excuse and a timeline to say she ‘happened’ to be looking down at her phone the very second he was supposedly at the door, so she assumed he went in. So ridiculous.

@@holylandfan3275 I’ve been trying to watch the trial. Like I said, I zone out and miss some. I’ve always felt that she’s guilty. That is one of the points that stood out to me. It’s possible that she was so drunk, hit him, fell asleep not aware that she hurt him so badly, woke up and vaguely recalled what she had done, immediately freaked out. I also believe her reaction to him not being home was over the top. The snow was not bad that morning. If you watch the dash cam video it wasn’t bad at all. The two things I’m waiting to hear about from the experts are: Jens search and if the time stamp can be explained and the information from Karen’s car. I do believe she will be found not guilty though. Not because she’s innocent but because the way the evidence was handled. I’ve never been a fan of trial by media. It’s an easy way to control the masses that wouldn’t know critical thinking if it slapped them in the face. We shall see! Glad I’m not totally alone!

She hit him so hard that he ended up in the yard and the only damage was a broken BACK tail light? He had scratches on one arm, two black eyes , and a fractured skull. All from a woman backing up and a broken tail light? The prosecution is never going to get past the house not being searched.

Boom!

I guess I need to research this case.. confused as hell

not everyone

What was the motive for the Albert's to kill John? Your theory is absurd.

@@dawnmills6755 if you have to ask then you haven’t done any research into this case. What’s absurd is commenting things that are actually established facts are absurd theories. Do some research lady. Hope you and your loved ones never get framed for a murder you didn’t commit and have uninformed people celebrate it bc they can’t be bothered to learn.

@@StephanieL.-rs2ulI feel the same

@@dawnmills6755 Who said it was the Albert's? It could have been Higgins. Why do half the witnesses not remember his jeep there, but when questioned remember every little detail about Karen Reads vehicle. It could have been an unfortunate accident where a drunken fight ended up in a death, by anyone in the house. It could of been Colin also. Why did nobody mention that he was in the house until many months after? Why did they not interview half the people at the house that night until the FBI started investigating the investigation?

yeah, those wounds on his wrist are far too distructive for someone like her but she couldve hit him with a rock or glass. so it is unknown

if you are watching the trial you know better

She thought he was fooling around on her. And she did go out driving alone at first but went home after contacting McCabe who said she would meet her at John’s.

Why is all evidence pointing to her and people are ignoring it. Trying to find reasons of other instead of looking at the facts. Not fairy stories from a defence team. She said twice she hit him. She asked can someone google how long it takes someone to die in cold weather. That is why the search is there. The defence aren’t going to tell you that now are they. She changed her story multiple times. She’s full on with lies.

You have NO IDEA what you're talking about.

crazy eyes........lmao.......wow

Oj is a liar. She is not

@@user-jv8zj6nb6vshe said she hit him twice. Then she said she isn’t sure because she was way too drunk. Now she says she didn’t hit him and remembered everything. Lol. Is that lies or not. Or just changes in story 😂

Because the FBI has stepped in to assist Canton and State Police in the investigation and they are analyzing the evidence before it’s turned over to Read’s defense.

@@Q-ZOO this is 💯 not true. They haven’t stepped in to “help” them investigate. The FBI stepped in to investigate them and their corruption. Why would the FBI be investigating the same crime the MA state police is already investigating? Even if Karen Read did hit John with her car- and she didn’t- this wouldn’t be in FBI jurisdiction. But police and government corruption would be! 💡

Is that what the defence have said ? Lol. She’s a killer. She admitted to hitting him at the start then changed her story once she as charged.

1 of the 4 things they turned in was altered as well. A video with 2 minutes randomly deleted midway through. They are pulling fingernails to make her look guilty.

​@@stevenprice6957nope. why do you lie?

Neither does the FBI

I think she accidentally hit him with her car, called Jennifer and asked her to look up how long it takes for to die in the cold so that it doesn't look obvious once he's found and evidence of her car taillight. I think the scratches on his arm are from the glass he had in his hand which was crushed by her car and did damage. This is just my opinion.