Тёмный

Are Criticisms of the Book of Mormon Witnesses Defensible? 

Doctrine and Covenants Central
Подписаться 44 тыс.
Просмотров 1,9 тыс.
50% 1

How can we confidently discern the difference between a reliable historical claim and one that’s not so reliable? This is what Casey and Scott discussed in their last episode, where they introduced five source critical questions we can all ask to carefully assess the reliability of a historical truth claim. In this episode of Church History Matters, they practice putting these five questions to work by actually using them to measure and evaluate various historical truth claims about the witnesses of the Book of Mormon, a very high-stakes topic with conflicting claims in the historical record.
This is the fifth episode of our 10-part podcast series on Good Thinking. For a full transcript of this episode, as well as show notes and additional resources, visit our website at doctrineandcov...
You can also subscribe to our podcast via Spotify, Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, and other platforms, and follow us on popular social media platforms. Visit linktr.ee/chur... to connect with us.
Originally published November 28, 2023
DISCLAIMER: While we try very hard to be historically and doctrinally accurate in what we say on this podcast, please remember that all views expressed in this and every episode are our views alone, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Scripture Central or The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Опубликовано:

 

30 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 12   
@mascotbenches5146
@mascotbenches5146 4 месяца назад
Great episode. I for one curls listen to a new episode every day. Keep it coming!
@paulabergeson5674
@paulabergeson5674 2 месяца назад
Love these podcasts!
@ashlyncrane8992
@ashlyncrane8992 Месяц назад
God loves you
@RyanMercer
@RyanMercer 4 месяца назад
🤘🤘👍
@jonathanettinger6970
@jonathanettinger6970 4 месяца назад
Ingersoll's supposed account is coming via a book written/published by someone who sent someone ELSE to talk to Ingersoll. Dud Ingersoll even EXIST? IF Ingersoll had first-hand knowledge, telling it to A is fine, but A tells B (now it's second-hand). B then published it. Our reading it makes it third-hand at best. We don't know the writer/publisher. We CERTAINLY don't know anyone who conducted interviews for it. We DEFINITELY didn't get it from Ingersoll ourselves (IF he even exists). The reliability trail is thin and tenuous at best.
@zon3665
@zon3665 4 месяца назад
Do you have Priesthood authority to discuss and teach about these witnesses?
@jonathanettinger6970
@jonathanettinger6970 4 месяца назад
Do you have permission to listen to the video?
@mascotbenches5146
@mascotbenches5146 4 месяца назад
What priesthood authority governs talking about history? You have an axe to grind?
@kuyalems
@kuyalems 4 месяца назад
He was just sharing relax
@mascotbenches5146
@mascotbenches5146 4 месяца назад
If you take the comments of zon3665 and run them through the diagnostic system these brothers are sharing you will see that Zon isn't just"sharing". His question makes no sense and he asks it just to stir the pot. I, myself, am perfectly relaxed. Thanks
Далее
БЕЛКА ЗВОНИТ ДРУГУ#cat
00:20
Просмотров 788 тыс.
МОЮ ТАЧКУ РАЗБИЛИ...!
39:06
Просмотров 366 тыс.
Вопрос Ребром - Серго
43:16
Просмотров 342 тыс.
Learning to Think Like a Historian
57:48
Просмотров 1,5 тыс.
The Nauvoo Expositor: the Spark That Lit the Fuse
55:28
Joseph Smith's Magic Spectacles - Dan Vogel
58:17
Просмотров 66 тыс.
Discussing Helen Mar Kimball with Hannah Stoddard
1:28:02
How Science Proves God! w/ John Bergsma
3:40:57
Просмотров 380 тыс.
17. Carthage - Empire of the Phoenicians
3:38:13
Просмотров 4,5 млн
The Beginnings of LDS Temple Worship
50:21
Просмотров 6 тыс.
D&C 18-19: Beyond Come Follow Me
37:49
Просмотров 36 тыс.
БЕЛКА ЗВОНИТ ДРУГУ#cat
00:20
Просмотров 788 тыс.