BenQ X3000i 4K Gaming Projector - bit.ly/3a4ajki **Just to Note one of the HDMI ports on the Projector does have eARC so can be used for audio return** ✅ Don't Forget to Like👍 this Video, make a Comment✍and Subscribe ▶ it makes these videos possible 😊
A few things: 1. If you were using a 4k projector screen the image would look far better than your plain painted wall. 2. Show the cinematic image with a 4k source not 1080p. Use an Nvidia Shield for 4k content as an example. 3. Run HDMI through a receiver for 5.1 or higher surround sound for movies and games.
One thing good, is that you did a projector Vs TV comparison. Projecting onto a plain wall also something, it shows the quality of Projector. You put the projector so low on the floor, still can get a nice picture. I got three low budget projector, I need to lift up and tilt at an angle to get a proper projection.
im a bit impressed with the Projector compared to an OLED with perfect blacks and good contrast when u made the room kind of dark even tho u have a complety white room without a proper screen or contrast screen it looked really good for my taste atleast
Everything seems perfect, but the contrast is only 10000:1. So the black will turn to gray, suitable for watching movies? Which is the best than EPSON 3800? Thank you！
Wow! Everyone nagging about a wall. Not everyone can afford a projection screen. The lower budget I can find a 4K projection cost 12.000 - 15000/1100-1400 dollars. And a screen 300 - 700dollar under 100” screen. I still useing my BenQ W1070+. I think I paid 300/400 brand new. And only replace bulb 2 - 4 years. 🥰
the projector looked great in his room when it was dark despite that his room was totally white without a white screen or grey screen and he compared it with perfect blacks and contrast of an OLED for me i would trade of the bit of Blacks Contrast even tho it looked great on both for a larger screen with cinema feeling
I've just brought this..does it have a 4 corner correction?? Having trouble getting it to fit my screen, this cost me 1k more then may Last one and that had the option!
@@GeekStreet Well it would ofc be used for 4k content haha. But as an overall upgrade, everything should be better than my current projector. The majority of content would be 4k :P
How does disney plus look on this? Does it play in 4k? I'm trying to decide between this and the x3000i but the x3000i is $1000 more. Is it actually worth that much more?
The spec of the is very similar with hardly much difference from what I remember. You won't be disappointed with either. Disney is not something I've tested but you should be able to stream in 4k too.
@@thesecretagent3443 150 up to 300 dollars i would not buy a DLP projector because a DLP projector most of the time the DLP chips will go bad and the chip are high
I think HDMI 2.1-abled projectors are just being introduced to the market (specifically projectors that support 8k). And im not sure how the input lag would be on those new ones since gaming projectors are just fairly new to the market. Not to mention those that do have HDMI 2.1 cost thousands of dollars... which would make sense if you think how much a 300 inch OLED TV would cost 😂
@@bricaaron3978 the way i want to put it very awkward as my room a L shape so it have small coverage and cant place it somewhere without blocking something ect due how big it is
@@starzx6475 Yeah, unfortunately I was forced to move recently, and I don't have the same space for my W1070 that I used to. I had a 24 ft long room, but right now I have smaller spaces and also lower ceilings...
*"pixel shifting should never be advertised as 4K. its not the native 4K image from the source. Its basically a 1080p source upscaled to 4K."* No, that's not true. I used to believe the same way. But I realized that the only thing that matters is what a display ultimately _produces_ -- the output that can be measured. It doesn't matter _how_ that final output is realized. Think about a CRT. A CRT uses "pixel shifting" -- it has only one single pixel! It shifts that single pixel around the entire screen fast enough to display thousands or millions of pixels each frame. For that matter, technologies like LCD and DLP use different "tricks" to display brightness levels and colors. If a display is rated for 4K output resolution, all that matters is that the display actually outputs [4096/3840] x 2160 individual pixels. This can be measured by comparing a 4K test image to the display's output, and verifying that individual pixels of the test image are faithfully reproduced. I do think that a pixel-shifting display should be advertised as such, as it is part of the inherent display technology.
@@fingsandstuff *"image can not be reproduced on a image sensor that is not 4k. "* You're right: It can't be produced *ON* an image sensor that is not 4K. But it _can_ be produced *BY* an image sensor that is not 4K. Just like you can take a ~20,000 x 2,000 pixel panoramic photo with a camera sensor that is only 4,000 x 2,000 pixels. How? By shifting the camera sensor (i.e. by rotating the camera). I've already explained enough to enable any reasonably intelligent individual to understand. But as they say, you can lead a horse to water, etc., etc...
It's due to the camera (as he said multiple times throughout the video) which is why it seems dull. It all really comes down to personal preference, bigger screen but lower quality, 3x as small but way higher quality.
Thats why this is called "projector" and TV is a TV. Bad comparison bro ..dont forget that if u buy an OLED TV that can get the size of the 300" will cost u lots of money
