Unlawful murder is not the same as justified homicide. When are you going to give up your car because some careless person or drunk killed someone with a car? @@JacksonHoulihan
really mozart1220 when exactly was that? people have been bringing weapons into public spaces since oh i don' t know forever.....dumb ass arrogant liberal with no historical knowledge at all.
I totally agreed with what he's saying. We're all free man. And free man don't take orders from dictators and numb nuts. It's our right and freedom you can't take it away from us. Period!!!
when he got his draft notice to go to Vietnam he did not bathe for a month, did not brush his teeth for a month, and showed up at the draft board and literally shit in his pants to avoid going to Vietnam. Actions speak louder than words. You want this man to be President?
@@rongermanjr you just said it all, you DAF dip$#!t. If you actually paid attention & VOTED we wouldn`t be in this mess, because guns can`t solve it, moron.
+Michele De Risi And Europe has been the subject of genocide and invaded and conquered, countless times by tyrannical despots needing American help. Nuff said.
Switzerland is home to one of the biggest gold reserves in the world, if Hitler did take Switzerland he of financed his war machine and taken over the world. But he never tired, Between the terrain and the well armed citizenry, he was quoted as saying it was an impossible fortress for now. The US was also as lucking during WW2 the Japanese commander Yamamotto said "you cannot invade the mainland US there would be a man with a rifle behind every blade of grass. Armed citizenry saved the Swiss and America.
When the world is at war with you gold isn't going to finance anything. You need Iron mines, copper, and other resources you can actually take out and put into your war machine. Gold was worthless to the Nazies, practical resources were everything. Gold is worthless if you cant buy from another country.
Hitler with money EARLY in 1938 would have been a disaster, but would have given him no leverage. The false premise behind his madness was that he would make a poor and starving Germany whole. They were broke from paying restitution from WWI. No one with anything Germany needed wouldn't sell it to them because their money was worthless. So they had to make what they had the best and take what they needed from neighboring countries. They had zero oil production. They raided the Jews and made up their hatred to steal from them and it just moved forward.
That's the biggest hoax I've seen posted on this subject. Switzerland cooperated with Hitler, he didn't have to invade, they allowed him safe passage. And no, Switzerland is not some impossible fortress, but they are a fortress of freedom and fortress of life for having the strictest gun control laws in the world. Also, Yamamoto never uttered such a statement. If your coward ass had served in the military like I did, you'd know the truth.
Ted says it plain and simple which is why I think plain talking guys like him should run for Congress. Get these lifers out that continue to degrade our country.
Robert J. duPreez very rough around the edges...which is unacceptable for so many people unless you're talking about a guy who wants to wear dresses. But cuss and hunt O no.
Typical actions reactions of people who are having their our God given rights infringed censored violations of privacy violations of being secure in your on home. Starting to become calmer may just be a early warning signal to those violating that a storm is coming beware we are just almost done talking ......
60BloodyChamp60 Isnt that the truth.. A lot not all men have turned into bitchs in this country. He's not "rough around the esges" hes speaking the truth. I aee that the truth is to vile for little fairies in this day and age.. Always worried about what the left will think. Who cares, they hate you. They want to take your freedoms away
Steve Smith My rights are not given to me by anyone, especially not your fairytale child killing psychopaths that you religious nuts brainwash yourselves into believing. Get a mind of your own.
"...a whole gaggle of numbnuts..." Say what you will. . . the man has a way with words. . . *I* will be the sole arbiter of whether or not I defend myself and with what. Anyone who presumes to make the decision for me is a criminal, and if faced by them - I will *end* them. "Retired" criminals commit no new crimes. . .
Dallas Henderson Cat Scratch Fever! A true cowboy. I have a vote for ted nugent for president button i picked up at a flea market. Yes i have also seen you very wealthy people walking around with us deplorables.
+ymp5000 What about the man with anger issues. He's fine all the time except for once when that one person pushes him a little too far. He loses his mind and pulls the trigger. Or the four year old who sees daddy's glock on the shelf. He looks down the barrel and boom he's gone. You see not everyone is as normal as you guys are to safely use a firearm. Look at the stats. 1.) Every week, 300 CHILDREN are injured or KILLED by firearms. 2.) More people in the USA are killed by their own gun rather then being murdered. Now, I'm not anti-Gun, NO WAY. What I think should be necessary is different points of limitations on the types of guns you can own. For example, If you go to any Walmart and fill in an application and have a quick background check, you can have a 22. Or, if you'd like, you can take a year of courses and safety checks and once you're finished, by all mean grab any gun on the shelf. My point is, let's think before we want to implement a major risk.
the rock What is stopping the guy with anger issues from taking a year of classes? Nothing. So the child looks down the barrel of a .22 and boom he's gone. Same result. Your stats are skewed. Those people being killed by their own gun include suicides which should be omitted because in the absence of a gun they will find another way. Accidental deaths by firearm have declined from 0.82 per 100,000 in 1981 to 0.20 per 100,000 in 2012. All the while the number of privately held firearms in the country has increased. None of what you have said here is actually responsive to my question. Who would I be safer from?
No. The guy Would not pass the safety checks so he wouldn't obtain a gun. If the parent didn't fell the need to keep an unlocked gun on them, the child can't shoot himself. I'm not here to answer your question. I'm just saying let's think before we do.
Let's see ...Ask anyone who is against guns this question: If you were by yourself in a remote part of let's say ..Alaska (point being you are trying to survive on your own with nothing). You set up a small homestead, learn to hunt by setting traps, have access to fresh water, life is good so far. Suddenly you are beset by 2 maybe 3 others who are stealing your hard won food and traps and blocking your access to the fresh water you found and were willing to share. But because they don't have anything and don't want to work like you did and aren't interested in asking you to share they think it's OK to come and take it from you. The last time they came into your camp they beat you up really bad and again stole all your food. What are you going to do in order to protect your person and the life you built for yourself? If you could construct a weapon would you do that? I would hope so. OK, so now we are in the real world, you still work hard in order to eat, but guess what, you have much more responsibility and you have others who depend on you to help them (children) and instead of 2 or 3 potential bad guys, there are thousands, some of who have hurt people in their past. Isn't it always better to be prepared? Responsibly prepared? I say, unless you are in complete denial to the world we now live in, Absolutely Yes! Don't ever be that one who's on the TV news saying "you wish there was something you could have done".
I tell them this: "When the next tyrannical regime is marching you and your family to the gas chambers, then send me a postcard about how happy you are with your moral decision not to own firearms."
Appreciate that ...I just would like the anti-gun side to justify, using my example, what else could you do in order to protect yourself and your person? Because in my scenario, without protection, people are not always understanding as you and WILL take advantage when they see weakness, so much so that your life means nothing to them.
the answer is, nothing; you find a corner to curl up into and and pray. that's the problem with anti-gun nuts; they don't believe in statistics or logic.
Tony Reynolds We would then be well into our Third World War. There would be no guns to ban. One of them would have pushed the button. Probably POTUS NUGENT. I voted for Mr. Trump. Head for the hills... there would be no nation to go to other than than the awesome containers they have to collect people with similar skills and viewpoints of the current world state of affairs we have.
These anti gun proponent politicians also have a group of armed security protecting their life and safety, what about you. What do you have? Police civil servants who would view you as a criminal from the moment they came on scene.
I know of a lady who had just got out of surgery was in bed sleeping this guy broke into her house ' The lady said the guy was on some kind of drug he threaten to kill her he jumped on her wile on the bed her stitches broke open she finally use her leg or foot to kick him off of her so she grab her firearm pointed it toward him and pleaded with him to leave he then told her he was going to kill her she didn't have any choice so she shot him once with the gun it was a 357 MAG he kept coming toward her so she unloaded shot him six times he staggered out the door ran up in the woods finally died'' If she didn't have that gun that night she would of been killed herself...
Jim Chumley What's to live with? She was prepared, she effectively defended herself and now there's one less scumbag for the rest of us to worry about. I would think she would approach the rest of her life with more confidence than ever before.
Randy R I've only used my Handgun Carry Permit for the intended purpose one time but,yes when you shoot someone there is some emotional aftermath to the action. The police accepted the explanation of how he tried to draw on me.The guy turned out to be unarmed but said that he was trying to bluff me. The whole time I was being investigated, I kept wondering if they were going to return with a warrant for me.Fortunately,it turned out that I'd acted properly & the guy hopefully is no longer trying to rob people.
the whole idea of making laws to regulate lawful gun owners is stupid. there is a shred of an idea in there but it is abso-fucking-lutely ridiculous when you consider how many laws we already have that arent enforced and held up as it stands. we already have laws that punish people for using a gun to commit a crime... we already have laws that regulate the sale of firearms... we already have laws that regulate where guns are and arent allowed period (schools, airports, federal buildings, ect)... we have laws that can put a criminal in jail for life but then we let them plea bargain out or parole the person in a few years. we actively chose not to be harsh on the penalties for the laws we already have but yet some wamt more. as if just havent more limits as to what will get you arrested is the key. its funny to me because, the people wanting more laws and more restrictions are not scared of me and rightly they shouldnt be! "I" have a wife, kid, house, cars, job, and a desire to live long enough as a free man to see my child grow up--I value my legal status and my blank/clean criminal record. i have no desire to ruin my status in life by commiting a crime. the person the gun haters are worried about is a person that is going to commit a crime and most likely doesnt share many of thlse virtues. inherently this makes the whole point of making more laws useless. unless you desire is just to find more and more ways to catch a good person in a legal scenereo where they are suddenly a potential felon for having, oh dear, might i say, a magazine that holdsmore than "x" rounds?!? or a gun/rifle with certain outlawed cosmetic features?!?! haha... or banning ar-15 rifles because of the brainwashing of ignorant people to think those are the dealiest guns... haha... nope. not sold. when the gov and courts start locking up or actually following through to the fullest extent on punishments related to gun crime, amd we sti show no improvement, I might consider additional laws.
