Billy Mitchell's Expert Witness Is Terrifying 

I love u Karl!!!

I will swim all the way from USA to Australia just to meet you

I hope u get sued In court Karl. U are the fraud. Billy won big in court... and u still haven't provided proof of fraud in charity case.

Wow.... Karl is now doing character attacks on a court witness. Karl u are such a coward. I see ur downfall coming soon

So basically the media never asked for Twin Galaxies version of events. The lamestream media is pathetic.

I wouldn't have pegged the guy as a gooner tbh.

shit was like a jumpscare

anything spread about this "witness" should be highly discarded and Karl should be reprimanded for pretending that personal bullshit has nothing to do with his "testimony" to the courts. Karl needs a kick in the balls. hopefully if he still has any, it might hurt enough for him to refocus on the court case and not the proclivities of some dude none of us know about. what Karl did was fucking bang out of order.

​@@OrgusDinpegging the guy is something he pays for

Zyda actually makes Billy Mitchell seem like a stand-up guy.

Billy hasn't done anything to justify his ego. Outside of Forever, Duke Nukem has.

i bet he wears his american flag tie to bed and says goodnight to it

​@@NerfPlayeR135He is here to kick gum and chew 4$S

Narcissism is crazy

Billy is the type to "self love" with a bottle of lotion while staring into said mirror

Technology expert indeed

"Professor Emeritus of Computer Science Practice" Creep who physically and verbally abuse women, incompetent and lying to gain money and his work actually hurt innocent people like Karl. He's a p athetic man.

You wouldn't believe how incredibly unaware most people are on social media. I've seen people doxx themselves more often than I'd like to think. Still disagreeing with Karl's notion on Zydar being sexually active from the looks of it.

how disturbing. I mean, sounds like rent-a-witness. sounds dirty. Sounds like a wild west, terrifying dystopian nightmare. second point, when he started out, I'm certain he didn't have his head in the online gutter in the same way as he did right before his retirement. So while I can grok that little by little, he was able to have his cake and eat it too, I imagine that the majority of college professors are utterly astonished and should-be-angry that here is a hyena with a job where they fire dogs

@@Oxxyjoe there is something called a "daubert motion" basically the other side can say "we think your expert witness has no idea what they are talking about", and explain why. If the judge agrees, their testimony is excluded. For expert witnesses if you lose a daubert motion even once, your career is over. So there is some recourse and it would be a very, very bad idea for an expert witness to be dishonest. Just like there are unethical lawyers, there are unethical expert witnesses, but many are also professionals who are going to tell you what they actually think regardless of whether it supports their case. They'd have to be very greedy to change it, since even analyzing the case to form an opinion is something they would need to be paid for.

@@demonicspire1345 your confidence is reassuring. But it seems like there's also something to do with, if "this will end your career" is the recourse, then, that probably doesn't actually occur much, because it's too severe. It's too severe to be used, and therefore doesn't get used enough. That is, based on your description of it. I get the jist, however. They're under the microscope and have to be excellent... but if everything were actually that perfect, would we have the problems we have? Clearly we have an expert witness who just says whatever right here bro

Yeap. Pretty much summed it up. This is why Billy may win, because it all depends which expert the Jury believes more. Not the actual facts.

@@Oxxyjoe the court doesn't care if it ends someone's career, and your opponent sure as hell doesn't care. Like other people are saying the expert witness is not really the issue in this case, its the TG lawyer royally screwing up and potentially getting disbarred for misconduct.

You're right, you were super lazy. Not a good strategy for coming at the goat.

Hey, props to you for apologizing and using this as a chance to grow!

Hey Moon, I hope the mob quiets down. You don't deserve hate, just a bit of criticism, and you've done all the right things. Hope things go smoothly for you going forward!

Holy shit someone actually apologizing on the internet? This can't be happening! We need to show this man outside before he corrupts us all!

Good thing to see some experts are more witnesses than others.

Yeah, even if he has tenure this isn't acceptable public behavior.

​@@milhousevanhoutan9235Nope, they let him retire and didnt ackowledge it at all. Spineless pieces of shit, every school administration everyywhere in the world.

Unfortunately, I doubt they will do anything unless this video goes into mainstream news or something. Universities have covered up or not acknowledge what their staff or professors have done before.

@@hackermansThen I feel we have a civic duty to make sure this information is spread as far as possible.

@@milhousevanhoutan9235 He’s not working there any longer. That’s what the “emeritus” in his title means: that he’s retired. Universities typically keep professors emeritae on the faculty list as a sign of respect for retired professors. Although, I imagine he’s likely to lose a lot of that good will with all these findings coming to light.

Actually no, the analogy works exactly right as it is. You are made up of 7 Octillion (billion billion billion) atoms each of which individually can in theory pass thru a wall in the exact right circumstances if every part of what makes them up phases thru in just the right way to miss all the space taken up by other atoms in the wall So for you to pass thru a wall, all 7,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 atoms in you need to line up just right to let you pass thru the wall Its exactly the same as the VHS replicatin the same mistake many times over and only in that one frame with zero other graphical glitches to warn as to a dirty VCR head

Well you can't prove I broke into the store! This expert witness says it's theoretically possible I just faded through the wall!

I mean, you *can* literally do that with non-zero probability. Just that the probability is so close to zero that it would never happen in countless umpteen lifetimes of the universe, but there is a verified physical mechanism that theoretically allows that (even macroscopic objects have a smeared wavefunction). The videotape error? There is not even a theoretical mechanism to support it. You can not create a mismatched NTSC video frame using an ordinary VCR no matter how it malfunctions, because a VCR has no framebuffer, it has only access to the one instance of time it is copying at that instance of time. It can't pull in elements from the previous or next frame. Or even previous or next *line.*

​@@tylisirnevery morning I run into my bedroom wall at full speed. Doubters will be in shambles when I phase directly through it.

Spot on for a pervert and liar.

Me: I decided to do some digging My team: "THATS IT LADS, ROCK AND STONE"

@@ontheturningaway bullshit.

well to be fair this didn't require a lot of digging at all, it's kinda on the surface.

@@ontheturningaway What damage has he done exactly?

@@ontheturningaway you can't be real... everyone he has 'exposed' are terrible people completely rotten to their core, or compulsive liars, or both. Doing damage to these types of people =/= doing damage in the grand scheme of things.

this tbh. There isn't even a nice gradual slope as we descent into the rabbit hole, it's an immediate nosedive into uncut scummy-ness. wow.

This is my favorite Karl video, possibly ever. It starts out so slow and methodical, to the point where it's almost boring. Karl finds Billy Mitchell's expert witness has a weird Instagram. But I mean, a lot of older guys have weird social media presences. Multiple plot twists follow. The lawsuit is, quite frankly, intense. It's every bad sugar daddy scenario, rolled into one.

This goose is cooked.

At this point I can believe anything about Billy and his associates.

At first it sounded like the guy just had some weird fetishes, and there's nothing wrong with that, but the stuff mentioned in the lawsuit goes well beyond that.

That’s about as consistent as most Universities protection rules. Like the recent federal case where Universities admitted they don’t protect Jewish students from calls for their genocide.

​@@drstrangelove307 lmao wat so you can go full austrian painter (in the name of allah) but if you say that not all historical white people were monsters then you're enemy number 1? US universities have the strangest, most inconsistent values.

He's just like me frfr

Captain bias lol

Ive just seen the rest of the video.... 😐

Triforce is more like Sergeant Scammer, considering all the crap he did with MVG.

Molestro

This is the greatest comment I’ve seen since the year started lol

It's REALLY funny when politicians or lawyers go "I didn't say that thing!" when there's like 80 videos of themselves saying that thing.

​@@gaminggoddess85 Snopes rated Joe Biden wearing a hard hat backwards as false... Until they got blasted by Twitter when it was 100% clear Joe Biden was wearing his hat backwards. Their correction wasn't even an admissions of error. They basically said: "By this specific definition of "backwards" it is backwards so we changed it to true."

@@gaminggoddess85yes, but after they denied saying “the thing” everyone still has to act as if they in fact never said it. It’s infuriating

@@themonsterunderyourbed9408 Your comment got ate by RU-vid for speaking facts. RIP

@@gaminggoddess85 Many such cases.

Or he just bought it

😂😂😂

😂😂😂😂😂😂

LOL

The dude is like in his 60s with obviously no children. And acts like some hot alpha male 10 who’s shredded. Gross.

Really shouldn't shock you. People give thousands to/spoil OF girls and don't expect sex.

​@@ewjimlSugardaddies aren't really known for being lookers. If they were, they wouldn't need to spend $5,000 to be with a girl

It does not matter if he is a monster, only that he may be right about Billy.

But he is not right about Billy. All he is saing maybes.​@@MarquisDeSang

Their expert witness testimony is what a twitter post is compared to a wikipedia article

​@@akaiappearsor a wikipedia page against 10 papers

wat

Thankfully the tea was speared and not spat out

He's so good he could give his report in only a few words: "Lol just trust me bro."

Although crass, I'm not sure that's "sexual harrassement".

​@@mellusk9194 Why are you defending the creep?

@@SeppelSquirrel I'm not.

@@mellusk9194 Maybe you don't think you are, but you definitely are.

@@SeppelSquirrel OK, so why are you sexually harrassing me?

Don't insult weasels like that.

How dare you compare those adorable furry assholes to this garbage

@@KGPromiseGaming yeah. at least the 12 weasels have the decency to not cheat at Donky Kong.

Remember the Dr Doom helpers in Roger Rabbit? Ya, one of them is Billy for real.

this makes so little sense that it actually starts to make sense

Rodd Todgers!

I was gonna say you made a typo, but I guess your keyboard was just in second gear

Men who probably did porn in the 70s wear that porn mustache like a medal.

​@@kbottrill1this community is the funniest thing I have ever been a part of.

@@kbottrill1 Got me choking on the blunt and inhaling air for dear God not two minutes ago

i don't think

Me nuther

Don't pretend this is new. That is a plague affecting the country. Stop thinking "this" s the first time X has happened.

Yup. You dump two of the most crooked, corrupted, and shadiest POSs in a company of two thousands men, and some way somehow they'll manage to find one another and become the bestest of friends.

@@dankyjoker are you sure???

I guess it’s not the first time a university would end up hiring a legitimately crazy person. It’s really sick. Honestly I just don’t like the thought of my money going to people like this, so I don’t give universities the assumption of having high prestige.

Lol no u didn't. Nice lie clown

@@CTomCooper I just saw the exact same comment so it's maybe a bot. Still a creep

@@Erokingu bots will copy and paste comments from real users in the same comment section

Looks like he railed you. You didn't report him hahahaha

Just do yourself a huge favor and don't imagine what Billy's home life is like.

Its California. The Chinatown of the US.

The lore is expansive

That's insulting to Chinatowns.@@n0m4nic

ị̷̞̏t̸̠̂s̶̻̮͑ ̸̳̰̚̚t̷̝̺̾̔o̸͇̖͗͘ ̵̢́l̷̛̞͝ạ̴̦̈́̀t̶̪̂͛e̷̝͑ ̷̤̟͑͆b̸̻̔̉ř̶̞ó̸̦̚t̶̫͋̎ḣ̷̰̜͠ę̷̩͗r̶̢̓̚,̶̞̊ ̶̠̇y̶̨̜̎o̴͍͊̀ū̷͔͕̌'̸͙̊v̴̬̪̊̒ë̸͔́ ̶̻͓̏a̶͛̔͜l̶̨̇͝r̵͓̊̇e̸̢̥͒à̶̤̏d̴̫̈́̈́y̸̱̓ ̴̞̳͗ĺ̵̤͇̓o̷̙͐́ͅś̵̗ẗ̵̼̉.̶͚̂̅ ̵̟͉̈́̇w̶̻͓̓̈́e̵̗͋ ̴͔͋ä̷̜͖r̷̮̈e̸̐̾ͅ ̴͎̂͝u̶̖͑n̷͖̹̆̚d̶̞̋e̷̼̋f̶̰̈́ë̶͉̈́á̸̖̓ṱ̸̞̆́a̴̤̤̾b̷͈́̈́l̸̨̒̚e̵͇͈̐.̶̧̆̚ͅ ̷͕̓ŵ̴͕̝e̵̱͝ ̵͕̎̑a̵̮̐ŕ̵̠͓̕e̵̛͜ͅ ̷̫̯͘i̴͔̇r̸̛̛͙̥r̴̪̹̾e̶͍̋f̷̠̦̌u̴̠̕t̸͔̘͊̚ả̸̗̚ḇ̴̻̌͛l̶̟̃e̷͓͐.̵̢̓́ ̴̦̎j̸̲͗͆ͅo̷̢͛i̴͓̊̍ň̵̹̘ ̶̐͋͜u̵̟̞͝s̵̜͋͠ ̸͉̠̓̕ô̸̠r̴̬͑̕ ̴̹̂p̶̥̌̒e̷͇̳͊ŕ̷̦̒i̶̹̰͝s̵̻̦̿h̸̲̓

He probably shouldn’t be overseeing graduate students

@@LydiaSnider He should be overseeing a prison toilet

Which means he is still interacting with students. Not a good look

Filming people inside their home is an actual crime.

@@lokthok Yes, but those students would have to elect to work with him. Either way, my comment is just to say that Karl misunderstood the page he showed, not to say anything regarding his behavior.

If the case had not settled, he would have been deposed, and both sides would've asked him followup questions. The settlement came before they had an opportunity to do that, so we only have his sworn affidavit. Even so, two pages does seem a bit on the short side.

I mean not everything has to be a super long but I get you

I mean, the entire crux of his argument was "well, when any number parts degrade, it's POSSIBLE that they could malfunction in the exact way a MAME would appear." That was as close as he was going to get to being able to explain the irregularities.

The report basically saying; Billy's video anomaly seemingly not possible to happened, our experiment to emulate it also failed, but it COULD still happen with right situation Yeah, really bs

There should definitely be an investigation into the ethics of Billy's lawyers. Remember the fake plaque that was submitted into evidence? That alone should get the state bar association on their behinds.

And they have

Let's not forget to factor in the human element.

That is a great comment, well done lol

The creepy pervert element.

LMAOOOOOO

haha

this is exactly why D-VHS should have been more popular, D-VHS proves that the format can be really good but not a lot of people know about it, it's sickening

The bloke was compromised the minute he enjoyed a peg 😁

The whole term "expert witness" speaks volumes. The term "witness" indicates a person who has seen 1st hand what is going on, whereas with an "expert witness" this simply isn't the case, they're a paid person (conflict of interest) raising speculation regarding what may, or may not happen. There's no proof beyond reasonable doubt here, it's purely speculation, and as such it shouldn't hold up in court, yet somehow it's relevant...

@@YouNameItGaming You're mixing definitions. In this context, a witness is anyone who testifies in court. And expert testimony is crucial for the justice system to work. For example, without expert testimony, it would be impossible to prove Billy faked his tapes because nobody saw him do it. It can only be proven by an expert demonstrating that what Billy claims is not possible. And while some conflict of interest exists, it's not like you're _allowed_ to just say whatever the client pays you to say. If you get caught knowingly lying, on top of it being an actual crime, you won't be allowed to give expert testimony anymore. Reputable expert witnesses simply won't do it. If you want an expert witness to lie, you'll have to hire some shit-tier loser like Zyda who can't get a legitimate job.

@@YouNameItGaming You mean "moral hazard" not "conflict of interest". Paying someone to say what you want is moral hazard: it incentivizes lying. A conflict of interest is (eg) holding the office that oversees vote counting, while also running for Governor.

@@elLooto Moral Hazard involves entering into an agreement with someone and they hurt you as they are not morally obligated to do so, like providing amazing insurance to a driver and the driver starts driving dangerously as they no longer care and this is a hazard for the insurance provider, but we are arguing the opposite that these people entering into agreements with expert witnesses actually want them to be morally corrupt as that will result in them saying exactly what they want to secure the pay cheque and get future offers as an expert witness. In terms of the conflict of interest it is clearly one, they are supposed to be interested in the truth but that will often conflict with the interest of future employment as expert witnesses who bite the hand that feeds them and disagree with the person who hired them don't get hired again.

I laughed out loud when I saw that :D

i guess it could be......THE Billy Mitchell???

University professors that have been there for awhile have tenure, so it's hard to outright fire them. The idea is to protect professors who publish politically unpopular papers, but it seems to protect downright bad professors at least as often.

It’s called professor emeritus. It’s absolutely normal.

@@Vaelosh466nah tenure means nothing

As I clicked on this video, I was thinking the same thing lol The videos just keep comin

​@@bransonSRight? I had the same initial thought since in the previous video it just sounded like he was someone Billy could pay to say what he wanted and didn't think it would need an entire video diving deeper into that. But after watching this dear God its astonishing that he has any sort of credibility

The strangest thing still remains the fact that Twin Galaxies put their tail between their legs and ran. I don't know, maybe Mitchell's attorney dug up some shit on TG owners...

Truth is stranger than fiction, isn't it?

Now this here is the smart, rational thinking, manly kinda man that Mr. Mitchell loves to love. In a strictly non-homosapien kinda way. Or however you say that. Mr. Mitchell has been telling these frickin' mouthbreather's all of this, but their shallow intellect combined with the sheer jealousy they must experience knowing someone as cool as Mr. Billy MF'in Mitchell is out there killin' the game, prevents them from accepting the truth. Honestly, I envy them too, for they have the opportunity to experience the one thing that I never will... and that's me baby. Mr. Mitchell outtttttt! - Mister Billy Freaking Mitchell PS. God says buy my hot sauce or he'll kick your ass.

Skinner: ...Yes

"Did you do any tests on a Donkey Kong cabinet? Have you even been in the same room as a Donkey Kong cabinet?"

@@ersatz_catsexactly. Love your work on perfectpacman 👍🏻

​@ersatz_cats "Do you know what Donkey Kong is?"

“This is a game that’s meant to sting. In more than one way.”

@@ersatz_cats Relax, he's an expert if cabinet joystick has a red top, it clearly "could be" an original arcade part because a dirty lens caused the color to change from black to red.

Shiiiiit, he paid me a couple milli just to let him be my "Expert Witness". Can you really blame him though? I mean come on, I'm Mr. Freakin' Mitchell baby. 😎 MISTER MITCHELL OUTTT! - Mr. Billy Freaking Mitchell

Yep, which is why i sus theres other Zydas at that school

totally true. in my country (Cyprus) we have a saying "Tell me who your friends are and i'll tell you whο you (as a character) are"

@@psylencecy Exactly. I was just thinking about this the other day, because it's not fair to judge someone if a friend of theirs turns out to be a scumbag, so how is that saying then still true? So here's what i got: Statistically speaking it's a numbers thing, obviously, but for people personally it seems obvious to me that anyone can make a mistake of trusting the wrong person. We can't read minds, we don't do through background checks on everyone we know and instead give people the benefit of the doubt unless or until they F it up, and we're all sensitive to plausibility and charm, and scumbags often necessarily rely on charm and deception to compensate for a lack of substance an worth. But when someone is total scum, they tend to attract other scumbags and push critics away, so they're left with other scum and with vulnerable people they can victimize/baffle/lie to. On the opposite of that spectrum are people who want to learn and grow and they'll have critical people close to them because they value each other. That encourages them to be around each other, and it has the added benefit of deterring scum bags because their biggest enemy is knowledge/honest criticism. So in conclusion: scumbags are inevitably dumb F's who don't grow but only learn how to deceive and gaslight more effectively, because everyone who could encourage them to be better is pushed away and/or abused by them. Life is so much easier and less harmful to people around you when we're empathic, kind, and sincere. I mean, how often would you think that someone will do something nice for that lying scumbag just because they want to do it? How often does someone surprise you with an act of kindness because someone thought about you? You don't have to ask for a lot I imagine. Most people don't. This guy though, if he doesn't abuse a girl to force her, she wouldn't even smile at him. So yeah, you can tell all that just by the friends he keeps close. Same for Billy. You know that he's a lonely lying sack of manure who has to rely on other liars to keep up his facade and to stay in his comfort zone/fantasy land, where he is somehow the good guy with great value. Kind of sad if you think about it. Maybe he'd be a totally different man if once in is life he had valued and respected just one person so much that he'd want to be the best he can, just because that other person deserves nothing less, like most people do. Sorry this is so long, it probably doesn't interest anyone one bit. I like thinking about these things and putting it to words. I think that a lot of people intuitively know how it works. And we don't need to put it to words if it just works and we know what we mean with just a short generalized sentence. I love looking critically at generalization and see if they work and how exactly, and what the essences/general principles of those are. i also love the sweet irony in how I am an extreme reductionist and I need 5 paragraphs to get to the core principles and someone else can just intuitively say the same thing in just one sentence 🤣

​@@stylis666omg you weren't halfway through when you said "in conclusion" haha. Yeah it feels good to get it out there, I get it, but too long for me 😂

Captain Obvious over here

Fun fact: he gave his consent for the film's producers to model him. He failed to read the fine print.

Always has been

​@@gparyaniThat's so Billy

Wasn't that character indirectly based on him? Art imitates life, and life imitates art.

It's directly based on him. Same with the big head guy from Regular Show. Most people who knew Billy knew he was a bitch before all of this happened

🚨...Sus... 👀

​@@GamerCrewUKBro shut up

Yup, all students go to Uni's with the hope to learn and/or to further their career prospects. Then, for a person in power who is not only their senior in age but also in experience to plan and execute such vile acts makes me seeth in anger.

why did you used the phrase "to be fair..." to preface your last statement?

@@bakedbake To be fair... I do not know. Makes no sense at all, maybe I intended that sentence to go in a different direction and did not properly proof read. Thank you for the heads up.

I know this is a joke, but just don't be an asshole, and you should be fine. xD

Haha I just saw that!

Being a perv online often translates to real life. It all depends on the frequency. It's about frequency. There's a threshold of normal behaviour, if you engage in this kinda thing that often it's bound to be part of your personality.

@@loldoctor See 10:30.

Foreshadowing in a 10 min video - Karl is really good. Imagine if you'd told Young Karl the first time he speedran what he would become!

Yeah i thought it was just a hit piece until he showed receipts and im like …well damn guy shot himself in the foot quite a bit

Yeah, it scared the shit outta me. I thought he was actually just throwing out baseless accusations. Good thing Karl knows better

Zyda is definitely not why TG agreed to settle. In fact, as it would seem, nobody would have ever seen Zyda's "report" had TG not secured its publication as a concession.

Trust the soyence. Trust the experts.

We can't prove time travelers didn't come to the past and alter the tape to make Billy look bad, therefore we can't trust what we see on it and must find Billy innocent!

​@@ersatz_catsTG's lawyer Tash screwed the case by contacting Billy's witnesses inappropriately, and the judge referred him to the state bar.

I'd assume TG has wanted to settle since the case was filed, the lawsuit is just a waste of money for them, but were never willing to state that BM hadn't cheated or put him back on the real leaderboard. So they probably got pretty much what they wanted out of the settlement.

Cause only a monster would support another monster

Oh, it disappoints. Just... it disappoints humanity in general.

The court is suppose to be neutral. One side presents an expert and the other side can question the validity of their expertise and have the person striked as an expert or just discredit them.

Yea. The court system blows. Case in point being that when someone is found innocent or is proven innocent over enduring a long sentence, say while in prison for years, then what would truly be just are for those who had falsely convicted him needing to be the ones to pay restitution to the innocent party. It’s how and why making a wrong verdict in court ought to be treated extremely seriously. That doesn’t happen, ever.

You can be an awful person, but still be knowledgeable about many things. The crux of all this is: define "awful person". Sure, we understand what truly good and truly bad means, but at what point between the two do you draw the line? Someone who watches porn? Someone who likes guns? Someone who has a certain opinion on abortion? How do you legally separate "knowledgeable AND awful" from "knowledgeable and NOT awful"... or should that even matter?

@@nickfifteen I would say vices are one thing, but when the man has been sued for sexual assault and has had multiple complaints from female students that aren’t merely reports over a decade later. Oof. He would have had better odds with just the vices. Also, him recording his neighbors and homeless people is already super weird. If anything I’m going to suspect that his status as a professor is just for prestige, so any claims of being knowledgeable I would find as questionable.

The messed up part is that if you look at his credentials, he clearly has expertise. Its scary that he seems to be an "expert for hire", willing to BS testimony to help his employers, whatever their case may be. To be fair though, not sure how common this is. In the heard v. depp trial, the heard side had a bunch of werid expert witnesses. dr. doofenshmirtz comes to mind.

It’s nice to see him admit his wrongs and not threaten a lawsuit like a certain other two

I probably chuckled too much while reading this in the engineer's voice.

The sad part is that the university, like many big businesses, probably cares more about its reputation than making sure the assholes they hired didn't hurt anyone or can't get jobs in the future where they could hurt people. They'd rather quietly have the person leave to go cause problems elsewhere.

@@tkienjoyer “We’ll be just fine so long as nobody harasses any women.”

Welcome to the world of leftist academia.

I mean, even in my university some teachers (with the same fuck up shit) just got into differents areas in the university like nothing happened. There's something really fuck up about it.

That's hilarious, someone should next rename themselves to this old creep. XD

@@RetroPieroOr Todd Todgers

Very good insight.

While true, it’s worth noting that it’s very hard and borderline impossible to remove a faculty member from their position. Especially one who is on the verge of retirement. I’m not sure what the situation is with this department, but in my time as a grad student I knew several older professors who barely taught any classes because students complained about them or their material was so outdated. I TAed for a professor who gloated that he had used the same exam for 20+ years, completely ignoring any and all of the advancements in his field. On the opposite side of the spectrum, I have seen Twitter posts come into consolation prior to tenure approval. About 8 or 10 years ago at a school in IL a professor’s job offer was withdrawn due to his comments on twitter regarding Israel. So it’s not just an issue of the administration not acting, it’s also that their capacity to act is extremely limited by the protections in place within the faculty system. And there are roundabout ways to keep professors away from students even if they ostensibly retain their title and position as before. Which isn’t to say this is all fine and dandy. And I’m sure know all of this yourself, but the other readers may not. But it’s worth noting that the issue goes beyond the capacities of the department or faculty members. Tenure doesn’t dissolve in the face of creepy twitter behavior because it wasn’t designed with that sort of problem in mind. Unfortunately, I doubt that system will ever change, and is more likely to be removed or replaced entirely due to how broken the university system is overall.

@@loldoctor You’re absolutely correct, and I’ve had a number of similar experiences to those you describe, myself. Hence my comment about getting/allowing the professor to retire being the easiest way for the institution to effectively get rid of them. But my point remains that universities try to handle these problems in-house (which, due in significant part to tenure, they tend to do poorly), and try to avoid letting any embarrassing details get out to the press. They think they are defending their reputation and the perception of their institution, but in fact they are simply dodging any accountability.

tenure should not exist. easy@@Billymanaco

This is a general university issue. Uni politics, no matter which country, is a cesspit at worst of times and a ball of spiders at best of times; some places a tad better, some a lot worse. It’s in how Unis are constituted; who gets to vote for what, who can fire whom, who decides that you get into a position where you get to do these things - it’s very network-y, intransparent (commenter loldoctor actually hinted to some of these issues; you won’t get tenure if the deciding faculty profs don’t want you; this can be purely due to your political opinions or world view - that’s… obviously an issue! Same goes the other way around; full tenure profs have been fired for having the wrong opinion on politics - and I’m not talking about extremist garbage; completely normal other side of the coin opinions) and disconnected from the ground floors.

That's quite a record....I believe a few in our soviet archives did that too, if it is possible, it was 1987 of course

I got close. Took me 95.86sec to vacuum your parents bedroom

I took a 41 second pee.

I bet you emulated your vacuum run, you big phony

Your the real MVP ❤😊

Yeah, I'm just like we get it. Dude cheated at Donkey Kong. Please move on and quit basing youre entire content around him.

fake it til you take it more like

I really don’t find myself holding universities in high regard. Individuals with merit sure, but oh man. It’s often the case that instead of being an example of the best of society, it’s a display of the opposite. I’d imagine anyone worth their salt distances themselves from any drama once they graduate or move.

@@CTomCooper well said!

seriously !! He must be bringing in some money for the school.. makes us educators look horrible

I can, it's in Southern California, just like another place full of individuals with similar... attributes, that being Hollywood.

Remember that Hollywood and the media attacked Sound of Freedom, an anti-sex trafficking film based on a true story.

alright robert

People still think "hold my beer" is funny?

​@Echidneys as long as they don't think aussies actually drink Fosters.

"Oh my fucking God, who the hell cares?" - Peter Griffin

IMO it still can be, but more often then not it's a declaration of intent to do something about the situation at hand at this point. @@Echidneys

My only complaint is the women suing him shouldn't have had her name public like that, but without a name it looks like Karl is just making up a story. I feel for the young lady and hope none of this ends up in her life more than it has to.

This needs to be at the top so Karl sees this!!

Yes

Agree we need this guy in the spotlight

Yea, pretending like billy mitchel is an interresant topic lmao. I cant even imagine someone caring about a donkey kong cheater, let alone revolve your entire career around it. Think about the fact Karl Jobst never has to work a normal job again because he made so much money talking about Billy Mitchel he basically does better than your entire family tree, quite a shame we live in a world where such useless people have such succes i guess

@@MoonTurky The video has 500k views. Cope & seethe

TG didn't fold though. Billy surrendered. TG decided, as long as they didn't have to reinstate Billy or unban him, they didn't want to waste any more of their time on him.

Didn't Billy bring this dispute so that his scores could be added back into the current TG leaderboard? They didn't, and he's still banned from TG.

They folded, it sucks but they did.@@ersatz_cats

​@@RevYars But Billy can spin it to the press that he won, and its clearly working. Thats why people like Karl have to keep putting pressure on him.

@@four-en-tee”putting pressure on him”. Billy is feeling no type of pressure

You're absolutely correct in your position and definitely have your priorities in order, his use of a tasteless joke is by far his worst character trait.

It's more than a tasteless joke, he's hitting on this chick and he's laughing at her for maybe having cancer? That's fucked bro. @@matthewhopkins666

While I agree with you completely, Zyda’s not being charged criminally, it’s a civil lawsuit. Though that doesn’t mean he couldn’t be charged criminally later on ig

@@xxCaptianNIKExx I didn't catch that, thank you for correcting me.

the fishy thing is being an expert witness lul

Considering the lawsuit and him being a compulsive liar, the money probably isn't real or at least he would not pay it for long. He tried to manipulate her into having an actual relationship. most likely so he wouldn't have to pay long term

​@@Snipermain yeah, if anything he probably paid $5k a few times at most and then when sexual advances were not accepted he started making various threats and stopped paying, could even use housing as a threat too, as he did with immigration status.

Nothing suspicious in Karl's actions?

I do agree, but if this is handled the wrong way, Karl could get implicated in a lawsuit by Zyda. If that guy is anything like his client, he'll sue.

Why? Who cares

"We need to inform the students at USC that their school knowingly and actively protected a sex offender or maybe worse" - You might want to be more careful with labels you throw around so nonchalantly. While we have no reason to doubt the young woman suing Zyda, her allegations are just that at the moment -- only allegations. Nothing has been proven (or, since this is a civil case, accepted by a jury to be factually accurate).

​@@koppsrget sued for showing publicly available documents? Haha

I imagine they'll be more students with stories to tell

and its about cheating

Get that speedrun garbage outta here! This is the Billy Mitchell Lawsuit Power Hour! Now sit down, I can't see the TV!

I don't speak for Karl, but Zyda should definitely be reported, and should not be around students. Karl doesn't do vids on Jirard or this guy just so everyone can ignore these warning signs.

Never interrupt your professor when he is gooning on Twitter.

I would say the onus should be on USC to stop letting Zyda be around students and stop posting those "photos" on a university account.

Naw, Zyda deserves mob justice for bein the monster he is

Don't need mob justice to report facts to the proper authorities. Can't imagine randomly messaging a man to harass him people just need to do the right thing quietly without kudos and clout