Boeing 737 MAX takes off almost vertically 

I would imagine many have military experience

lol

These are test flights conducted under strict technical supervision by test pilots most of whom are ex-military pilots.

Do you think that there is a pilot from f16? 😁

OMG - I was gonna say almost same thing! When you flunk outta top gun but say F It - I'll show passengers a good time on the Boeing Max!!! Lmao

Lol MCAS haha I am too scared to fly the Max even if they fix nah uh never flying one.

facts

If he didn't, he'd of stalled, even after he leveled off.

It is true ! I won't fly on this model

@@calebryan4467 Actually once they fix it you'll be fine.

Vertical crashing

Underated comments

Savage

excellent.. very true

OMG LOLLLLLLLLLLL (but sad)

😂😂😂

I laughed more than I should have to

Haha

@Johnny Sanchez This comment is way better than "If its Boeing, I'm not going." Like, NOT EVERY BOEING CRASHES.

Lol

no shit dummy lol

@@PabloGonzalez-hv3td Pretty sure MCAS would have over-ridden that angle of attack at take-off...no?

Agreed!

S Rennie you need to learn the difference between high angle of attack and high attitude climb

Pablo Gonzalez he meant it as a joke stupid

u idiot

not funny

Funniest ever 😂😂😂😂

I'm feeling guilty that I find this funny

@@faizbashaAirplanes but it is funny.. Jus that these days you'd have to give an apology online after lafing ...me 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂no apology it's funny

Well said bro.

What you really want is a plane being able to do these steep takeoffs to demonstrate the limits you can comfortably stretch the airframe to, so that they don’t have to worry about overstressing the plane :)

Victor H.B. Proves my point- humans are clever but not wise.

Now with bigger engines and quirky computer software.

You buy planes? Must be nice.

Well mate, the point of this video is to show how close the plane would have fucked up

Well a couple of those planes that took off were apparently about to stall so the plane decided that nose diving into the ground was better.

@@OfficialSamuelC Neither of the aircraft which crashed were even remotely close to a stall. Both crashed due to bad AOA data being fed to computer. The cause of the bad data in the first crash is not officially known but the aircraft had prior issues (including MCAS activation which the crew correctly overrode), on the day it crashed it had just come out of maintenance who obviously failed to fix the issue. The cause of the bad data in the 2nd crash is theorized to be the result of a bird striking the left AOA sensor, damaging it and causing it to send bad data to the flight control computer which then used the bad data

@@Jamenator1 The stabilizer trim cutout switches next to the pilot's right knee would have stop the situation immediately, but you have to leave them off and manual trim is not effective over a set airspeed due to aerodynamic forces.

aviation.stackexchange.com/questions/61239/what-does-in-trim-speed-mean-with-respect-to-boeing-737-mis-trimming-correctio

Sad yes but completely avoidable. Pilot error. Out of thousands of flights, 2 went down......while tragic it isnt out of the ordinary for a new model. Happened 3 times with the 727 I believe. And in those cases it was pilot error and not having experience on a new plane. The 727s were capable of landing on shorter runways due to a new wing design that pilots weren't used too. It's the same with the 737.......there is anti stall safety feature that pilots, especially in lesser developed areas, aren't familiar with.

Impressed with a near catastrophe!!!

@@johnrogan9420 Never been to an airshow, I take it.

@@MrNuthed The problem was none of the airlines were informed of the mcas.

@@ajf5745 No alfi. The problem was 2 crews not even qualified to fly a Cessna...

Two crashes?? I only know about the ethopian airlines

@@harpreetsinghmonga11 : The first one crashed in October 29, 2018 in Indonesia: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion_Air_Flight_610

@@harpreetsinghmonga11 Lion Air 610

so sad :(

@@harpreetsinghmonga11 It's your problem if you don't know anything about the previous crash 5 months ago of one of the 737 MAX owned by Lion Air.

Smarten up a bit.

Me

That vertical climb looks terrifying.

Yes, poor people

Взлет конечно потрясающий после 2 разбившихся самолетов.😒

RIP

Dash kkkkkkkk you are too much

Made me lol.

Rolf. No offense to the dead but funny comment

The main problem is pilot did not know about the MCAS, the 737MAX was amazing

The crash fault wasn't the plane MCAS system. It was because of the pilots that didn't have a proper training about the new MCAS system. They should have desactivated the MCAS system when the nose of the plane is already stabalized with the horizon. The MCAS system prevents the plane from stalling (On high speed) if the nose of the plane is pointing up with a high thrust applied. You won't be able to recover the plane stability again and it may lead to the plane to stall. Thats why the MCAS system was invented for. It is also needed so the plane can pass the quality and safety inspection before being launched on the market. So everyone who is saying things like its the plane fault etc. First you must do a research before complaining and second with a lil bit more of knowledge about the new system those pilots could have avoided that crash. (Sorry for my english, thank you)

Im sorry but this video is not for rey-loads on RU-vid or Facebook. Copies will be deleted !

@@topfelya that seems kinda rude and greedy!

@@brandonsantoro47 I'm not rude !

And they crashed, lion air and Ethiopian! wow

Still safer than driving your car, so at some point you realise you just have to get on with your life.

TopFelya tyuuu

*Slowly claps*

Yeah and it falls from the sky even faster!

The irony of this joke...

You are right

There’s passengers on it❓❓❓or just a show?

@@sue9587 Just the pilots.

DiZZeDilligent ookay! Then that’s impressive

dragonfly6908 Then that’s impressive

It's a fake simulation

PUBG MOBILE SOMALIA I’m so sorry for your loss 😔

@Glory Grace he was wrong maybe he didn't read the subtitle.. but yes, another 737 max had accident in Somalia a few days ago..

R.I.P. I’m sorry for your/the loss. < 3

R.I.P.

@Get it get it Nuggets How about we are all humans. How about that.

More likely Monarch, where load factors aren't such a problem :)

Ryanair do not have it.

Ryanair's fleet consists only of 737-800s, though after seeing what MAX can do they are probably like "shut up and take my money" :'D

They just ordered 200 of them though.

Careful, Ryan Air Is A Cargo Airline In Alaska. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryan_Air_Services Ryanair Is The Airline You Mean. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryanair

Yeah. Me.

Me

Fucking MCAS automation!

Blake Sanden I

What happens

+++++++

Rt

True. Indonesia dan ethiopia sudah menjadi korbannya. Use google translate to read my opinion. :)

The point isn't power but stress testing.

Yes!!!

This plane is only good for terrorists, apparently.

@ Even they wouldn't want one. If 911 Terrorists hijacked this plane they would've crashed in the sea instead of the WTC.

@@Carefreeblues agreed

What do you buy them for? To convert to a house in your back yard :)

Lol

Tf is a portent?

@Anderson Mendes it is so it suggested it to me just now.

Same...

It’s always someone else’s fault 😂

@@moo24251 Reality check... lol

Hope Imoh really??

Fucking freak. This is a comercial flight

I love British airways 777

Don't be a dick.

Yeah it's designed to take off in the shittiest conditions on earth. I never thought about how OP it would be in perfect conditions though.. damn

Westside Flyer 8

paulanderson79 you guys this isn't a dick measurement contest.

Agus Santoso Yep! Flawed plane will crash again. 100% guaranteed. No matter what software fixes occur.

@@cmetube Really? How long have you had a dual career as both a Boeing engineer and a prophet? The amazing climb is because there are no people or cargo onboard and this is a demo at an airshow. It does beg the question of how such a flawed airplane can fly like this, though, doesn't it?

@@halcyonoutlander2105 small cookie, unique taste.

@@mpenner2124 Just because it had a flaw, doesn't mean it can't fly. It can still perform all the tasks of a regular civilian aircraft, computer or not.

@@khylejoseph166 Of course. They screwed up in their assumptions and execution with one system, but they'll get it right and it will be fine. The "fundamental flaw" story is not true, just some fake news from VOX and similar sources, which is what I was referring to above.

What? There’s been a third crash??

علي اليافعي Ali Alyafee No, I don't think so.

Yep and that looks exactly like an MCAS demonstration now.

Why?

@@tecno4u31 The plane takes off at a very steep angle of attack (risking a stall). The MCAS system is designed to kick in, in that scenario, and reduce the angle of attack for nine seconds at a time. That is possibly why the plane levels off suddenly. Obviously, the pilot was a stunt pilot pushing the plane to it's limits.

:-(

Spanish Montana Why's that? The third world has always had more plane crashes than anywhere else, it's the nature of primitive societies that can't do anything other than clumsily attempt to use the technologies of superior peoples and societies.

Illuminated youre typing your stupidity on technology built in asia

😂😂 same here

Hahahaha

Hmmm... I don't know about that, but you should really use DUOLINGO COMBINED WITH THE POWER OF DUPLO PLAYTIMES, GLA! FUN FOR IBABS!

Meh

Its the newly introduced MCAS functionality that is fucking with the pilots....

Yes,but ETHIOPIAN pilots were not trained enough to handle this 737 when to remove from AUTOPILOT to manual when plane started to dive.

They said it was the new software malfunctioning

thank god the take-offs aren't that steep with passengers on the plane.

and no real amount of fuel

That didn't seem to bother the Hughes pilots I mentioned in my comment above! In fact, that was the most popular airline in town!

It was not Vertical; maybe 60 degrees and ran out of climb performance very quickly!

@@islandwx11 Well if you pay attention the plane did climb upward for a good bit straight up at about an 80-90° angle before leveling off and moving forward. That's quite an impressive feat for a commercial jet to do.

Great piloting

Well not in this case

Unless he stacked it into the ground then yes it is great piloting..risky but any landing you walk away from is a good one...on the whole

e gret 😂😂😂

e gret lmao

Its a piece of shit engineering. Shameful. The plane is weird and possessed.

@@abhijitmahajan2007 Weird, possessed? A plane? By what?. What an idiotic comment. Boeing planes are brilliantly engineerd, and have been for years. These things are manmade, and as such can and will go wrong It is sad that so many people died. I know that they will find and rectify the problem. The pilot flying that plane should be severely censured, he's not In a fighter jet.

😆😆😆

Yeah true safety first. Boeing are having a lot of problems in the past years!

Hi

@@camjustdoit.7879 Now they say it's a software failure!!

Even in nigeria also

I remember Airbus having the same problems with software when they first used the fly by wire system. The aircraft software would try to override the pilots input. It’s fine when your phone or tablet plays up but when it’s a $50 million aircraft carrying passengers it’s a different story.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

That would be great but I wonder when we will start flying to holidays

dtz1000 why

This is the old 737 Max

Cameron Mee is it ? The old ones don’t have dual end wing flaps

The planes are so advanced that they’re crashing lol

😂

@@wendelllima768 aaaah seu desgraçado kkkkk

Fuck you. "Legends" do not say that.

@@CorbsVids cmon bitch, you're not brazilian. You dont gotcha what hes mean. Back off bitch. Lol

@@CorbsVids I agree :p thanks for the respect btw

Lol

What a disgrace.. should have spared the poor people that had nothing to do with it.

No mcas

I will never ever board that flight or step a foot in indo Very scary experiance

I know I'd find this comment in the comment section. :(

@@sidneyurikhob689 Tell that to ryan Air

Your correct

That's an air show, nothing like a commercial flight take-off

При таком вертикальном взлёте самолёт может войти в сваливание и просто рухнуть. Так что он вряд-ли перевернётся🌚

Он может ето сделать, потому что очень легкый, нет пасажиров, багажа и имеет мало топлива.

Наш суперджет лучший !

ЮТАНОВСКИЙ ЖЕНСКИЙ ХОР суперджет даже и половины этого не может

@@Vectron-is5hk суперджет не наш. Наш крым.

corisco tupi probably just have 10 minutes of fuel?

***** I wouldn't go as far as only 10 minutes of fuel, but probably very little indeed.

If it can do that unloaded with minimum fuel odds are it can do the same fully loaded with a full tank of fuel. If the situation ever required them to perform such a maneuver that is.

Bruh that'd be awesome

I'll travel with it in August and I wanted to watch some videos to calm down myself ....haha... nope 😂😂😂

So wrong but, so funny I'm dead!!!! 😳😂 anyone, anyone!?!?!?

Clever 👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽

It is not the airplane’s fault. I realize that the investigations are not concluded yet, but the majority of us pilots who fly the 737 variants understand perfectly what happened. If American-trained pilots were flying those two airplanes, they would not have crashed. Now everyone is going to tiptoe around the real cause, and will be afraid to say that third-world pilots and airlines are a whole different world than in the USA. We are spoiled, because we earned it. But that is why flying is so safe in the states. The cause of the crashes is technical to explain, and people do not have that long of an attention span. They want their news is 30 second clips, but this can’t be explained in 30 seconds. You need to understand aerodynamics first, then 737 systems, redundancy, what MCAS does and does not do....I could go on. The 737 MAX is a fantastic airplane.

What an incredibly stupid,and arrogant reply,these planes have been grounded world wide you idiot!

It's an airshow they're showing off and with no passengers and a minimal fuel load it has loads of excess thrust. Every manufacturer does it.

It's OK. It's got an anti stall feature.

No it was. MCAS detected that the plane was nearly vertical here and so pushed the nose down. On both crashed flights, the MCAS detected the plane was nearly vertical when it was just flying straight because of a faulty sensor and so pushed the nose down. This caused a nose dive too close to the ground and they crashed...

And remove from autopilot.

😂😂

Psh. That's something only untrained pilots can do.

Yes if it was heavy. But in this case it was empty and light and they went to full thrust.

At the top of the climb it was stalled, it fell over the peak in zero G, trim flaps full down trying to lower the nose. They were test pilots who can fly anything with wings.

@@rayg9069 had it really stalled it would've crashed. If a plane stalls in climb it usually either comes down with nose pitched up or banks and rolls over to one side

@@DaGuys470 If you define stall as lose of lift over the wing the plane was stalled, it pushed itself over purely on thrust and recovered, it did slew over to one side slightly.

Any plane would unless you have wet thrust.

If it's not Boeing I'm not going... still

I agree this is not ok. I hope people refuse this shit . It is not save

@@jennyfrosch19 If its a boeing you won't be going 😜

If its boeing im not going 😁

www.reuters.com/article/us-ethiopia-airplane-witnesses/ethiopian-plane-smoked-and-shuddered-before-deadly-plunge-idUSKBN1QS1LJ?fbclid=IwAR3_LmhKFLG-rpiwGJUtC87ZzowGlRCQWFDcpnQuO6Uh95rMpE4WgBBxkC4 Wouldn't have anything to do with sensors...

soaringtractor read properly before calling someone out as a dumbass.

Hahaha!! We know it's a test flight, bu if it was a passenger plane, then there would be sick bags as face masks and the compulsory adornment of incontinence underwear!!😂😂😂

Burr;3;/ And you are a dumb ass also for sticking your long nose into others conversations !!!! DUUUUHHHHH!!!!!!!!!

AAYAN IF..... he cannot make a positive statement he needs to keep his mouth shut !!!!!

@@lmao9444 He only did it in 1

... HiGHWAY TO THE DANGER ZONE......

Que como así?

No! Buy an Embraer

😂that’s colder than a mother in-laws kiss on Christmas

Mother in law's are always Witches.

Hhhh Not all of them are that bad..😂😂 Ciao

biggerbi hahahaha!! 😂😂😜

😂😂😂

It might have engaged towards the very top of the arch-over depending on how slow they got, but the pilots were in control and had it inhibited, as those aware of the system can see.

Yes fearfully it's the way it is reported in newspaper

You know it! Those guys there knew what they were doing! Now do it without turning MCAS off!

@@TheFrenchPug Unlikely, MCAS only operates with flaps up and at the edge of the envelope (high Angle of Attack). Even if it did operate, all it will do is increase the pull force on the yoke required to perform the maneuvers. MCAS is not a hard protection like on airbus, all it does is attempt to make the aircraft feel more stable by increasing the pull force required at high AOA by in putting some nose down trim, it does not stop the crew from making aggressive maneuvers

@@Jamenator1 Well, then, it sounds like something else was causing the trim tabs (?) to be driven all the way down on that screw. My friend flies the Airbus A380 (?) for Fed Ex and said it sounds like they were fighting the MCAS or bad AOA sensor input somehow but he has not flown in one himself.

@@TheFrenchPug If you are referring to the recent Lion Air and possibly Ethiopian crash. MCAS was the likely cause, except only that it was being fed false data from a sensor. The fact that the lion air crew managed to fight MCAS for 12 mins goes to show that it is not an aggressive or sudden trim input. It is also instantly overridden by the crew's trim inputs, i.e. the crew have higher priority than MCAS and their trim inputs override those of MCAS. However it is insidious and unforgiving, each time the crew stop trimming, MCAS will start trimming again after a 5 sec delay if AOA is still high (or if bad data still exists). Looking at the data from the lion air recorders, the crew at the end stopped trimming against MCAS (possibly distracted), there were a few short trim inputs but not enough, so essentially they let it wind the trim further and further nose down without realizing until it was too late and the aircraft couldn't be held in level flight. I'm guessing the most recent crash will turn out to be similar

@@Jamenator1 I believe you will be correct. Based on what we've been told, that is what makes the most sense. But they could have also turned MCAS off however, is it possible with bad data coming in the pilots still weren't sure of their attitude?

Boeing is nothing but greedy scum bags that should be in prison.

It's happened on many types of planes not just Boeings it happened to Airbus first but they didn't crash because its computers cleared the faulty data in time learn about the ADIRU in the A330/A340 and Qantas flt 72

ჩემი ცოლის დაქა,ლები

Why?

Kwamashu Siwawa well you don’t know shit about aviation to say such thing. MCAS needs to be fixed but other than that the B38M is a very well built plane

Its people like you who know nothing about aviation who screw aviation up People said the same about the dc10 and it ended up being one of the safest aircraft to record with proper maitnence

The Seattle Times article confirms about the true, root cause of MCAS - related events: the 737 MAX is a flawed and rushed design that in its current form should never have been certified. MCAS is a feature that is supposed to fix the now aerodynamically unstable design that whose functionality went terribly wrong. FAA must never allow Boeing to do what FAA should be doing itself. Boeing worked on the new narrowbody 737 replacement since 2010 and panicked when Airbus nearly won all of American Airlines famed order for 300+ jets. Enter the rushed 737 reengine job, currently known as 737 MAX... Now, over 350 people paid with their lives for company's urge to always bow to shareholders ahead of safety and common sense. www.seattletimes.com/business/boeing-aerospace/failed-certification-faa-missed-safety-issues-in-the-737-max-system-implicated-in-the-lion-air-crash/

@@AviTheWolf well you can go and book the flight now, see you in hell

I'd put my hands up and scream of joy

Yes xD

Fax man why the hell they be doing shit like that

@DINOS br 10-15 degrees IS NOT vertical.

This is a test flight.