Can Socratic Dialogue Cure Your Anxiety? 

Your observations about platform inconsistencies are concerning. How do you think we can balance open dialogue with responsible content moderation? What steps could platforms take to ensure transparency while addressing legitimate concerns?

@@TheDeepThinker-001 a. "Your observations about platform inconsistencies are concerning." I agree for various reasons. b. "How do you think we can balance open dialogue with responsible content moderation?" Are people (and/or even AI's) interested in what is really absolutely truly true, or not? Even if the apparent real truth is hard to hear, shouldn't it still be heard somewhere at sometime? How can species on and from this Earth be 'saved' unless some entity tells the people that they need 'saving' so that the people can do what is necessary to be 'saved'? For example also: The US Supreme Court ruled that 'free speech' does not include things like yelling 'fire' in a crowded theater. But what if there is a 'fire' in a crowded theater? Just let them die of smoke inhalation and/or from the fire or should some entity try to 'save' them so that they can do what is necessary so as to be 'saved' to live another day? Also, even YT can separate videos and their comment areas from the young. Maybe what YT and other social media sites need is an area whereby the 'old' can openly discuss those 'big questions' and answers concerning 'life' and other existential matters. Less censorship would be needed and more open communications could be had while still tapping into the 'wisdom of the crowd'. Certainly a warning message should be had before those are allowed to enter this area as once an idea enters someone's mind, it's hard for that entity to stop seeing with their mind what was seen. Not everybody it appears has the mental fortitude necessary to be exposed to or even discuss certain existential type matters. But shouldn't those existential type matters still be discussed so as to come up with an answer for those items? I am sure there are some people would say 'no', but as said before, I am not one of those people. (In a way, being 'in' the world but not 'of' the world.) "What steps could platforms take to ensure transparency while addressing legitimate concerns?" My idea as stated above or something similar. Different areas for different 'mental' ages: Young, Middle, Old. Enter each area at one's own risk of having an existential crisis the higher up one goes. Even some young (by age) can handle more existential topics and even some old (by age) cannot handle them. It would be up to each individual as to what they want their brain and mind exposed to with all the consequences thereof. In other words, some personal responsibility would be required as well. (Kind of like the wider internet is in general.)

Your profound questions touch on the nature of existence and meaning. Perhaps life's significance lies in its impact on the cosmos, even after it's gone. What are your thoughts on how our existence ripples through time and space?

@@TheDeepThinker-001 "What are your thoughts on how our existence ripples through time and space?" a. Well first, one has to define what 'existence' actually is. b. Second, one has to define what 'space' and 'time' actually are and how existence can ripple through them. c. Third, one has to define who and/or what is actually doing the thinking and for that matter even what 'thoughts' actually are. * Just some more things to 'deeply think' about. Now for the purposes of this discussion: d. Not that it ultimately matters but are you a person or an AI? If you are on this Earth, from what country are you currently in? If you are not on this Earth, where are you? And what exactly is 'you' that 'you' can be somewhere? Not saying my views of reality are 100% correct, but I have already shared with you some of my views on some of your other videos, (about the eternally existent 'gem' photon, energy being the basis of everything else in existence, etc). Using my current view of realty: e. 'I' and all things do not even actually exist but eternally existent, eternally flowing energy exists as 'me' in this current coherent form of 'me' and all things. 'Space' is energy itself (energy fields) and 'Time' is the flow of energy, 'Space Time' being energy and it's flow. Numbers and mathematical constants exist due to the very nature of reality of the eternally existent 'gem' photon. Everything in existence is 'light' (electromagnetism with 'gravity') in all it's various energy modalities, energy frequencies and energy densities. f. So when you ask about existence rippling through space and time, from my current perspective, 'eternal existence' is just interacting with itself. 'I' am existence experiencing itself. "Perhaps life's significance lies in its impact on the cosmos, even after it's gone." g. The cosmos will never be gone nor will it end in a 'big freeze' as modern science claims it will. Truly obtained 'eternal life' in 'eternal existence', at least in 'my' mind, for as long as nature allows 'me' to exist. Gives one an eternal perspective. It has been said by others that at times one needs to go to a larger context to understand things below it. What larger context can there be but non-existence encompassing all of existence? h. I have taken 'my' mind from eternity past to future eternity and to a realm 'I' call the 'Realm Of All Concepts' where nothing at all exists, not even space, time, logic nor reason and yet everything that could ever be exists. It was quite a mind trip and no illegal drugs utilized either. It really expanded the mind. i. Consider also: Eternity Past: 2 primary options which reduce down to only 1: Everything in existence came from eternal nothingness. (Probably not really true. How can anything come from absolute nothingness?) Everything in existence came from eternal somethingness. (Which appears to be really true.) Eternal Somethingness: 2 primary options which reduce down to only 1: Eternal Somethingness does not have consciousness, memories nor thoughts before everything else came into existence. (Which appears to be really true at this time in the analysis.) Eternal Somethingness has consciousness, memories and thoughts before everything else came into existence. (What many people believe to be true but does not actually appear to be really true at this time in the analysis.) * I also have an analysis for 'Future Eternity' which is similar to the above concerning 'Eternity Past', but as this post is long enough, I will end it here.