@@ThaBotmon He probably just wants to make this review purely the Charlie's Angels movie, and in the next part he'll name it something like 'Charlie's Angels TV SHOW' or sumn like that
I like during the scene where she misses her assassination, her reticle is on the chest of the guy, but the guy grabbed his neck despite not being shot there. Great filmmaking, 10/10.
@@GangsterFrankensteinComputer Yeah, you have to actually zero an optic for the individual shooter - you can't expect a woman to know that, what with the patriarchy and all...
When Bruce willis appeared, with his back turned towards the camera and said: "I'll take you anytime, punk!" I literally cried on the theater. Such a beautiful cinematic moment. Thank you Charlie's Angels.
I recall Elizabeth Banks kicking a fuss over people not seeing the film, claiming "misogyny" is why men aren't going. To be frank, I didn't go because it reminded me of Baywatch or CHiPs; tv to film adaptations that treat the material cynically and without any love for it. Looking at it as its own thing, it comes across as if someone wanted to replicate the success of Kingsman. However, they didn't understand what made Kingsman work from a storytelling, character, or action perspective.
Dude I completely forgot both those reboots existed and you’re 100% on the money. It looked like a cheap cash-grab that I just didn’t care to see, because it wasn’t like the early-00s movies were high art
I'm glad women have a slightly louder voice in Hollywood. Finally, female directors can compete with male directors for who can deliver the most unhinged rant during a national promo interview.
I feel the rant is an attempt to make her still relevant, not caring if it's negative publicity. I mean those other "reboots" are quickly forgotten by people, because the director and actors not complaining about the failure. TLDR, since she can't be more famous (or still famous), she choose to be infamous
@@deanjustdean7818 Crispin Glover plays a man who only communicates via screeching. In the span of twenty seconds, he gets: A) Matrix-kicked, B) Matrix running-drop-kicked, and C) Matrix Liu Kang Bicycle Kicked. Each kick comes from a different person, and all of this occurs while The Prodigy plays very loudly. So it's the fun kind of camp. It's downright goofy.
@@gabrielaharries8149 It's THE villain entrance. That's how you hook an audience. @Grant Gardner I think everyone in the early 2000's knew motorcycle-gunkata. It was a better time.
The old Charlie's Angel's were early 2000's films that didn't give a shit about plot and just had fun with the action. This film takes everything so seriously which makes it even more stupid.
And weirdly doesn’t at the same time for the sake of comedy? Like there’s a way to handle comedy and drama at the same time, and this movie definitely missed the mark. The screenplay is a hot mess.
I love the rebranding you are doing moving your more simple commentary videos to a second channel and then diving back into reviews more akin to your older classics here on the main channel. All your content is great entertainment regardless and it's great to see your creativity coming to life again.
Feels wierd to see this 3 years after it came out. I remember watching this in the dollar theater when it came out pre pandemic. That theater no longer exists. Rip
Okay, I gotta admit the soap in the eyes thing works on paper. It's clever and funny and seems like a good trick to use to avoid a fight. It was just shot terribly.
Not like the past videos were bad, but man, this video feels like some classic ralphthemoviemaker in a special way. Good job Ralph, keep it up, proud of you
The early 2000s Charlie's Angels movies looked like an Applebees. It's goofy and hollow and unhealthy but that can be nice sometimes. Charlie's Angels 2019 looked like a Sephora. I don't go in to Sephora. It's noisy, shallow, and thinks it's better than me.
@@Predator20357 being a Supreme Court justice is a life-long position. if she had stepped down when some one who wasn’t a full-blown fascist was president she could’ve been replaced by another more left-wing and pro-women’s rights justice.
She was a profoundly evil woman who did all she could to step on native American people and other minorities, have a short compilation: Native peoples, immigrants, and treatment of minorities. Ruled against the Oneida tribe over a dispute regarding its territorial claim, her majority opinion stating: "We hold that the tribe cannot unilaterally revive its ancient sovereignty, in whole or in part, over the parcels at issue." 2 In Navajo Nation v. United States Forest Service, she ruled against the Navajo nation, who have consistently protested US encroachment of a US forest-service run ski resort on Navajo territory known as the sacred San Francisco Peaks. In Inyo County v. Paiute-Shoshone Indians, the Paiute tribe asserted that it was against their privacy policy to allow Inyo county district attorneys to investigate their employees. They stated that their tribe's status as a sovereign nation made them immune to state processes under federal law and asserted that the state authorized the seizure of tribal records. RBG concurred with the supreme court in dismissing their complaint suit. In Salazar_v. Ramah_Navajo Chapter, the issue in question was whether the US government, when it enters into a contract with a Native American (Indian) tribe for services, must pay contracts in full, even if Congress has not appropriated enough money to pay all tribal contractors. In a 5-4 decision, Ginsburg sided with the minority that stated the government shouldn't have to pay. In Atkinson Trading Co. v. Shirley, the supreme court unanimously ruled against the Navajo nation that charged a hotel occupancy tax for providing services (police, fire, and ambulances) for fee land (non-indian territory within indian territory). The court ruled that the tribe's imposition of a tax upon nonmembers on non-Indian fee land within the reservation was presumptively invalid without establishing that the tax was related to a consensual relationship with Atkinson. In Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Ginsburg dissented with the majority, who ruled that an Indian Nation were entitled to sovereign immunity from contract lawsuits, whether made on or off reservation, or involving governmental or commercial activities. In Alaska v. Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government, the supreme court unanimously ruled against a tribal council who wanted to collect a tax from non-tribal members doing business on tribal lands. The Court decided unanimously that the land was not the tribe's land subject to the tribal tax, even though it was owned by the tribe, because it was not part of a Native American reservation. Because all but one reservation in Alaska (the Annette Island reservation of the Tsimshian) had been eliminated by the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 1971, the decision had the practical effect of prohibiting almost all Indian tribes in Alaska from collecting taxes for activities conducted on tribal land. In C & L Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizen Band, Potawatomi Indian Tribe of Oklahoma, Ginsburg in her unanimous court opinion stated that: "An Indian tribe has sovereignty and is immune from suit in a state court unless that immunity has been specifically abrogated by the United States Congress or clearly waived by the tribe. In this case, the Potawatomie Tribe entered into a contract, using a contract form that the tribe provided, that agreed to arbitration and to having the dispute heard in state court. This is a clear waiver of the tribe's sovereign immunity." A podcast by Red Nation, w/ Rebecca Nagle, on the Supreme court's Oklahoma Decision. Helped push through the Atlantic coast pipeline, to allow it to cross through federal and native lands., 2 Refused to block keystone XL pipeline. In her final supreme court decision, helped push through Trump's fast-track deportation bill., 2 On Black Lives Matter / Colin Kaepernick's kneeling protest: "I think its dumb and disrespectful, but I wouldn't lock a person up for doing it." Later retracted her statement after receiving public backlash. RBG hired 1 POC staffer in 25 years. Kavanaugh, a conservative justice, has 25% POC out of his 48 law clerks. One writer noted that Kavanaughs views on affirmative action don't reflect his diverse hiring practices, while Ginsburg's progressive views don't extend to her chambers. This is an improvement from her 13-year tenure on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit, when Ginsburg never had any black clerks. When this issue was raised during her Supreme Court confirmation hearings in 1993, Ginsburg said: “If you confirm me for this job, my attractiveness to black candidates is going to improve.” That promise was ignored. 2 Her best friend on the court was the most racist, conservative justice in modern times, Scalia. In the fawning book Notorious RBG, one of the few mentions of race is in the book’s discussion of Bush v. Gore, the contentious decision that decided the 2000 presidential election. The authors mention that Ginsburg’s draft of her dissent had a footnote alluding to the possible suppression of Black voters in Florida. Justice Scalia responded to this draft by flying into a rage, telling Ginsburg that she was using “Al Sharpton tactics.” Ginsburg removed the footnote before it saw the light of day. This anecdote’s inclusion in the book is baffling, as Ginsburg contemplates calling anti-Black racism in the most facile of ways. But when her friend Justice Scalia plucks an argument straight from right-wing talk radio to shame her out of doing so, Ginsburg instantly capitulates. Scalia called the Voting rights act "racial entitlement", opposed women's rights, and consistently defended anti-gay measures, yet these views did not stop her calling Scalia her "best buddy" on the court, their families even spending every new year together. Law and Order In Brogan v United States, ruled that due process does not apply to those being questioned by law enforcement. In Kansas v. Carr, the Kansas Supreme Court had overturned a pair of death sentences, on the grounds that the defendants’ Eighth Amendment rights had been violated in the instructions given to the jury. The U.S. Supreme swooped in, informing Kansas that it had made a mistake; nobody’s Eighth Amendment rights had been violated, thus the defendants ought to have continued unimpeded along the path toward execution. The Court’s decision was 8-1, with Ginsburg putting her name on Justice Scalia’s majority opinion. In Samson v. California, she went against the other liberal judges, on the issue of whether police could conduct warrantless searches of parolees merely because they were on parole. She sided with the police. In Heien v. North Carolina, Ginsburg held that the police may justifiably pull over cars if they believe they are violating the law, even if the police are misunderstanding the law, so long as the mistake was reasonable. In Plumhoff v. Rickard, she concurred with the court that held that the family of two men could not sue the police after they had shot and killed them for fleeing a police stop. In Taylor v. Barkes, she concurred with the Court that held that the family of a suicidal man who was jailed and then killed himself could not sue the jail for failing to implement anti-suicide measures. In Nieves v Bartlett, agreed that cops should be protected from lawsuits as long as they cite probable cause in the original arrest. In Scott v. Harris, a high-speed chase involved a motorist being paralyzed after the cop ran his car off the road. Since the motorist had no charges or suspicion, the court was asked to decide whether the chase consititued unreasonable search and seizure, and whether running a car off the road constitutes deadly force that should be liable to lawsuits. Justice John Paul Stevens, the lone dissenter, argued that the videotape evidence was not decisive, as the majority claimed it to be, and that a jury should determine if deadly force was justified. He stated a jury should be used, instead of the case "being decided by a group of elderly appellate judges" As a law and order liberal, she consistently stands with police against outspoken Justice Sotomayer. Others A primary reason for her continued support for Roe V. Wade and abortion rights, is to prevent "growth in populations we don't want too many of." Ruled that temp workers didn't deserve paid compensation for being required to watch amazon's anti-theft videos.
The energy, script, editing, and even the voice over in video is so much better! Feels like the old RTMM videos that made me subscribe to this channel years ago, I'm very happy to see Ralph returning to form. Keep it going!
"His mom now lost a son!" 🤣 love how the 'girl power' in this movie consists of killing and maming men - little girls' fathers, mother's sons, and women's brothers. Countless lives ruined and loads of trauma dumped on innocent women. Great job, angels.
It will always baffle me how studios think that taking these cheesy and tongue in cheek movies from 20 years ago and making gritty serious remakes is not only gonna bring back the old audience, but bring in a new one when the old audience likes that it wasn’t too serious and a new one probably doesn’t even know what it is
And then had the gall to say it wasn't meant as a feminist manifesto. She was the one going out there promoting the film as one. Can't blame the marketing department when you wrote, directed, and produced the project. So brave of her to make the first film starring women though.
@@osidiusemphatic3505 to be fair, while I'll never see this movie, I can sympathize with her backpedaling on it. The chances of the studio giving her that talking point are ridiculously high. Directors, writers and producers still have bosses who tell them it's a good idea to present the film a certain way while doing press.
She’s the one who had the intro sequence be random totally unrelated stock footage of women being inspired/happy in various ways. Bank’s marketing comments aside it is about as explicit as possible in the movie itself. I’m sure they were well-meaning but they 100% thought this would be some big Black Panther moment for female-led action movies and it’s incredibly dishonest of them to pretend otherwise.
Ralph, the effort on this video clearly shows, I loved it! Please keep doing stuff like this mixed with the more simple recommendations and reviews because I can understand that stuff like this isn’t easy to consistently do.
Yeah, I hope Ralph does know how much people(myself included), love his videos, because they're always so hilarious, like the "Lifetime Movies Suck"; video; or the "Charles Stiles: Mystery Diners", video; or the one about Ghost Shows, and especially the videos about those annoying, and insufferable "spies", who call themselves "Angels", ugh; they're all SO annoying, and how can they do this to Sir Patrick Stewart, as well? He deserves better too.
11:00 Maybe unpopular opinion but I love the performance of this scream and angry point. It's like the numale version of Gary Oldman shouting EV RY ONE
My reboot elevator pitch: The Angels are brainwashed, MK-ultra, Manchurian candidate-style assassins activated via code-phrase from a phone call from Charlie. The Angels begin to break free from their programming and turn their assassin/spy skills against Charlie and the shadowy network of mind-controlled assassins.
Since this got reuploaded, I just want to remind you that, no matter how much you hate the soundtrack in this movie, the soundtrack to Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle included a cover of Elton John's "Saturday Night's Alright (For Fighting)" but performed by NICKELBACK FEATURING KID ROCK.
YES!! We got a Ralph skit! And he was NAKED! Omg I've never been more happy to have been born on a turnip truck! This is proof that scientology is GOOD!
Man Ralph who did you piss off at YT HQ? I haven't been recommended any of your videos in months! Since the Dangerous Man stuff, and I've been a subscriber for years.
Alien Series,Hunger Games,Resident Evil series,Underworld series,Tomb Raider films, theres TON of action movies starring women that didn't bomb/suck like this one!
Ralph in this review is like a grizzled, retired boxer. Charlie's Angels enters the ring and throws a few punches, pushing him down. But quickly he gets back up and throws punch after punch after punch, winning the match and starting his journey to the world circuit. That make any sense?
Especially when she could have easily resigned under the Obama administration when she was dying, in order to replace a "like for like" judge on the bench.
If you really think about it, the characters in here are pretty similar to the characters in Pitch Perfect. Naomi Scott's character has similar beats to Hailee Steinfeld's character Emily Junk (being a nwebie/noob). Kristen Stewart, while emulating Kate McKinnon, is very reminiscent of Rebel Wilson's Fat Amy (and a little bit of Brittany Snow's Chloe) with her character. Ella Balinska's characters is a combination of The Anna's (Kendrick and Camp) characters (Beca and Aubrey), except replace singing with martial arts. It wouldn't be surprising if Banks asks the Pitch Perfect cast to star in this and all of them ran for the hills (with the exception of Hailee doing a cameo).
I watched this movie in İstanbul and when they mentioned going there in the movie, the whole audience groaned audiably and started murmurning because we just know whenever Hollywood shows our city, it will be awful and insulting. I cringed so hard while watching that I couldn't keep up with the story at all and at some point my friend swore at the screen because of how horrible their depiction was.
Elizabeth Banks' Charlie's Angels movie makes McG look like Mel Brooks directing two comedy classics. Charlie's Angels (2000) & Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle (2003) are hilarious. I still adore Lucy Liu.
My favorite part of Charlie’s angels was when Michael Morbius came in and said “it’s morbin time” and he turned off the awful pop music so we wouldn’t haven’t to listen to it anymore
Why'd you have to censor the stuff where the killer describes Ralph's naked body. I really wanted to hear the description. Is there an uncensored version you'll post on Patreon?
