@✝️ The Vegan Vicar🌱 *to...... using the asterisk. Standard notation for corrections. Also, since I'm here, being an omnivore is an immutable characteristic of being human. You need meat for proper nutrition. Saying otherwise is a lie if we're being honest, and a myth if we're being polite. At least 5 different essential micronutrients are available nowhere else, not even supplements (because of what those compounds metabolize into, not their constituent ingredients), but in meat. It isn't evil when a bear eats a fish, as when a human has a steak or a chicken breast.
@@righteousindignation3548, that is rather PRESUMPTUOUS of you, wouldn’t you agree, Slave? Presumption is evil, because when one is PRESUMPTUOUS, one makes a judgement about a matter, despite having insufficient facts to support one’s position.
@@mrsninis_0477, that is rather PRESUMPTUOUS of you, wouldn’t you agree, Slave? Presumption is evil, because when one is PRESUMPTUOUS, one makes a judgement about a matter, despite having insufficient facts to support one’s position.
You can judge this kid by his appearance, but at least he did something that none of his peers will ever do, and that’s engage in civil discussion. He asked questions politely and let Charlie answer without trying to shout him down.
YES!!! I agree this Channel's emotive headline was completely misleading. It seemed to me that the questioner held no definitive view or opinion on the subject and was simply seeking another perspective than that to which he is undoubtably being exposed by his both his peers and his uni's woke, loony-left faculty.
@@count916 Yes, he probably meant it as that and gave that example as a concrete one for actual "regulation stuff". There's nothing wrong if, say an adult, decides to transition and live their live in that way. However, rules and regulations that give proper organized boundaries to our reality shouldn't be bent and broken just to cater to that person's "personal sexual preferences". People forget that adults could actually do these cosmetic surgeries way back before the tr*ns word was used by politicians on the media to create this trend. The keyword back then is that they are "consenting adults", and we didn't bend laws in the government or made kids live the same kind of life, just to make them feel good about their life choices brought about by their sexual preference. Because at the end of the day, this entire shtick is about that...a person's sexual preference. You're born a woman but prefer to have sexual relations with your fellow woman? That's your sexual preference. Not your sex/gender. Politicians pushed the play on semantics using the word "gender" to get more votes and the medical and psychiatric industries jumped on the chance to profit huge off of it, inventing ways to rationalize this craziness that led to the hundred pronoun nightmare mental illness we have today. Remember that the industries that push this kind of thing onto the people and children are the very same people who make tons of cash out of the people who believe in it.
😆 that is just basic decency which should be expected. the kid is not even smart enough to understand the difference between men and women- it is dumber than 3 and 4 year olds!
@scott Burns stop giving them participation trophies. return to having some basic standards at least. and bring back bullying and shaming for anti social and infantile behavior- rather than pandering to the lefts degenerate infantile and anti social behavior
@@dutchdykefingerit’s not true, I am a respectful youth that doesn’t want anything to do with these delusions. I can see the bigger picture here. Pin the pawns against each other it’s harder to see what’s going on around them
@@dutchdykefinger Maybe he's doing what young students should be doing, and listening to all sides before making a decision. It's fair to say that a lot of transgenderism ideology is flawed and delusional, but then again, most of the "Turning point" audience believe in the god delusion. So y'know...apples, oranges.🤷😂
Credit where it's due, he seemed genuine in his questioning and didn't become a tantrum baby that so many professors and bureaucrats seems to love to devolve into. I sincerely hope that kid amounts to great things.
I got the feeling that the kid was genuinely asking questions because he didn’t understand and wanted to be educated in these matters. And Charlie Kirk answered very well and dismantled the wokisim currently being promoted.
I’m glad to see people acting in a respectful manner, he asked questions and seemed to want to hear the answers given. I always enjoy how Kirk is respectful in his answers and how he expects the people there in the crowd to be as well.
With all due respect, in no way was Kirk respectful. He also never really answered the question. He just started going on about a single situation and never addressed how would we eradicate transgenderism from ALREADY CONVERTED ppl... He didn't answer it, cause there is no valid answer. PS. I'm not pro trans.. but I am pro GOOD debate... this was bad
I think this kid is needed at these events and glad to see he wasn't afraid being completely out of his element...I don't have to agree with him but we do need dialogue...He was respectful also
Yes, we definitely need dialogue. So, glad Kirk makes that point about sports, narcissism. Am so sick of so many people just going along with this totalitarian trans agenda.
When someone have a minimum willing for reasoning, they will eventually leave the bubble. Especially when young, because they were got when they are vulnerable and on their "rebel years".
Another reason I respect the questioner is because he didn't get off track during Charlie's reply and was able to go right back to his actual question. Most of the time, people throw random questions at Charlie in an attempt to start a shouting match or hoping that Charlie will react badly. If Charlie says "What was your question again?" often they don't remember.
This was a candid conversation. People are confused now, whether we like it or not. This man who questioned Charlie carried himself patiently, professionally, and curiously to get honest answers for himself. I thought it was great and a good example of how we should always carry a conversation to explore and understand each other's ideas.
That dude is on the cusp of reality, almost there. That was probably the conversation that he will be thinking about while he lay down for a long time. Good job, This is why respectful discourse is so important. Anyone who wants to take this away is for sure the real Fascist.
Charlie Kirk nails it every time. Thank you for being one of the very few bravely speaking out against this evil madness that the media and government are trying to make normal.
I'm 35 and went back to community College to finish a degree. Wokeness was wrapped in EVERY subject. I couldn't do it. I feel I wasted $2k over being brainwashed.
@@gweilospur5877 tf are you talking about? Old & behind the time? Because normal ppl want to go to school & not have woke leftist ideology shoved down their throats? You sound ridiculous.
That dude wasn't bad at all, just been fed BS and appears to be open to different perceptions, plus he has manners and non-confrontational. Well done bro
Isn't it so truly American to have a civil discussion or disagreement instead of screaming insults at someone you disagree with and refuse to listen to valid arguments that could be addressed ⁉️
Glad to see someone asking some honest questions rather than trying to box the speaker in, or stand there yelling. These days you don't expect it, but it's refreshing when it happens.
On ya Charlie 🤩 you are an articulate, intelligent, brilliant, strong man, the world needs more people like yourself, thank you for what you do 👍🦋 Anne from Melbourne
So glad to hear common sense expressed! Keep men out of women’s bathrooms! Go ahead and dress like a woman, but walk into the mens room dressed like that.
Watching these videos I'm amazed at their ability to remain calm and the knowledge they have and how it enables them to answer the questions with facts and not emotions .......we need more people like this in the world
Kudos to this young man. I love good and helpful and meaningful discourse between people with differing views. Me included. It's easy to have discussions with like minded people, but my favorite ones are with people who have different views as I do. So much to take and give in those talks.
He doesn't understand common sense, but ok. "How does he not understand common sense?" Great question.. I'm glad you brought it up. Because he has to ask these questions in the first place.
@@kujo62 Common sense has little to do with peoples understanding of transgenderism. There is no reason for the average person to understand it or how it affects these individuals.
@@kujo62 It literally doesn't. Common sense is basic information that people use to form an opinion. There is no way basic information can define trangenderism, as you need far more than basic information to understand it.
@@thewatcher5822 Intentionally confusing people by changing the definition of words and phrases on a daily basis is not common sense. How are people supposed to keep up? They can't. Common sense will tell you that. That's why hippie boy is asking these questions. He's too confused to realize that his questions are absurd.
And when digging up artifacts and any human bones, there is no way to tell if that person was transgender. The bones and DNA samples and what is revealed through testing is not what the mind perceived but what the biology was.
There is no way to tell if someone is transgender other than self identification. There is no objective measurement to tell if someone is actually trans. It’s a made up ideology.
There are no physical traits to being trangender. So if you look purely from a physical point of view you are not understanding transgenderism. It is how they feel, and goes much deeper than X or Y chromosomes, and they will understand these feelings at a very young age. To understand trangenderism you need to first accept it exists.
This was an intelligent, respectful discourse between two thoughtful, mature adults.Thumbs up on the content and two thumbs down on the clickbait headline
He did wreck him, philosophically, and he IS indeed deluded. A little hyperbolic, but what was outright false, as clickbait is universally agreed to be outright false, while this delivered exactly what the title said?
@@righteousindignation3548 He didn't "wreck him" ffs, the kid asked questions to gain Charlie's perspective. Then he got his answers, thanked him, and politely left. I've even seen Charlie act far more hyperbolic, it's often how people get points across in a discussion. I agree 100% with Charlie's views on this, and I agree it's 100% clickbait to draw in the offended left, and radical right :)
I don't think he was delusional. He raised very valid points, and never got angry. He was just clarifying points that many people in the audience would be thinking.
I wouldn't say Charlie "wrecked" him, I'd say they had a very professional and courteous discussion. Good on the young man for being respectful in asking the questions.
Bruh, I truly feel bad for people who end up like this. Charlie said it best, let people dress how they want, feel how they want, or love who they want to love. Just leave the rest of us completely out of it. I think that's the biggest issue I have. I dont want to see rainbow flags anywhere in schools or public buildings, but if you have one on your house, go ahead. We should not and will not be rearranged socially because a small percentage of people live a different lifestyle.
For real, I used to not hate gays, lesbians and whatever else there is, frankly I can't keep up with the language anymore, but the more they keep cramming this mess down our throats, I am starting to despise them all. If they would just STFU, I believe they would find probably 90% of people don't give a dam, just leave us alone and stay in your lane.
Honestly I'm happy to see both parties respect one another oppose to yelling and getting nowhere. Don't like the title of long haired hippy, his allowed to ask questions and did so respectfully
sex: the state of being either male or female in most species of metazoans. In humans, each cell nucleus contains 23 pairs of chromosomes, a total of 46 chromosomes. The first 22 pairs are called autosomes. Autosomes are homologous chromosomes, that is, chromosomes that contain the same genes (regions of DNA) in the same order along their chromosomal arms. The 23rd pair of chromosomes are called allosomes (sex chromosomes). These consist of two X chromosomes in most all females, and an X chromosome and a Y chromosome in most all males. Females, therefore, have 23 homologous chromosome pairs, while males have 22. The X and Y chromosomes have small regions of homology called pseudoautosomal regions. The X chromosome is always present as the 23rd chromosome in the ovum, while either an X or Y chromosome may be present in an individual spermatozoon cell gamete. An extremely minute percentage of humans are either (anatomical) hermaphrodites or of indeterminate sex (or to be more accurate, disordered sex). That does not negate the incontrovertible FACT that there are but two sexes/genders. In order for reproduction to take place, there is the requirement of a female ovum and a male sperm to unite, and because the entire purpose of the gender/sex division of most species of animals is to enable procreation, the sexual identity of an individual is best classified according to the gametes produced by the individual in question. There is no third gamete. Cf. “gender”. Both terms (“gender” and “sex”) originate from Latin words: “genus” (meaning “begin”; “birth”; “kind”; “race”; “gender”) and “sexus” (meaning “sex”; “division”; “gender”). If the reader is curious to know the reason for this term being included in the glossary of “F.I.S.H” (apart from the fact that it is actually used in a handful of chapters), it is because, in recent times, LEFTISTS have been desperately trying to change the meaning of the words “sex” and “gender”, in order to serve their immensely-perverse agenda to destroy civil society with their hateful, wicked, immoral ideologies, especially by promoting the nonsensical idea that a person is able to transition from one gender to the other. gender: the state of being either male or female, and because the entire purpose of the gender/sex division in most species of animal life is to facilitate procreation, the sexual identity of an individual is best classified according to the gametes produced by the person in question. There is no extant third gamete. An extremely minute percentage of humans are either “intersex” (typically referring to those who are anatomical hermaphrodites) or of indeterminate gender (that is, not easily determined by a cursory inspection of the external genitalia), but that does not negate the incontrovertible scientific fact that there are only two genders. As far as we know, there has never existed a single human being with the ability to BOTH conceive a child in his/her womb and, simultaneously, successfully inseminate a woman (or in more disturbing terms, for a hermaphrodite to inseminate him/herself). And even if such an individual has existed, that person would be a combination of BOTH male and female, and not some imaginary, novel third gender. In those rare cases in which a human is born without gonads, the other characteristics of sex/gender would be taken into consideration - firstly, the allosomes (sex chromosomes) found in the DNA of every cell, and then, any extant genitalia, since even those females who have experienced the misfortune of being born without ovaries, for instance, usually have their remaining sex organs intact). Cf. “sex”. Both terms (“gender” and “sex”) originate from Latin words: “genus” (meaning “begin”; “birth”; “kind”; “race”; “gender”) and “sexus” (meaning “sex”; “division”; “gender”). So, essentially, the only significant distinction between the two terms is that the etymology of “gender” pertains to the beginning of things, as can be plainly seen by the other English words that originate from "genus", such as “generic”, “genetic”, and “generate”, whilst “sex” is a scrupulously-literal translation of the Latin cognate “sexus”. The mere fact that the word “genitals” (referring to reproductive organs) is very closely related to the Latin “genus” is further evidence of the assertion that the term “gender” refers to the binary division of human (and of course, many non-human) sexual identity, and NOT to any taxonomy based on emotion, feelings, psychology, or any other non-biological categorization schema. If the reader is curious to know why this term is included in the glossary of “F.I.S.H” (apart from the fact that it is actually used in a handful of chapters), it is because leftists have been desperately trying to change the meaning of the word in recent times, in order to serve their immensely-perverse agenda to destroy civil society with their hateful, wicked, sinful, objectively-immoral ideologies. Until relatively recently, the word “gender” has ALWAYS been used in the etymologically-accurate sense of the term, and even in the former case, predominantly where leftist ideologues comprise a significant proportion of the population. See also “leftism”. If you are truly wise and intelligent, you would surely have recognized several amazing secrets contained within the body of this treatise, “A Final Instruction Sheet for Humanity”. However, perhaps the most secretive secret, shall forthwith be revealed: It is IMPOSSIBLE for a human being to change his or her sex/gender! (You are implored to keep this secret - do not tell a soul!!!) For example, a man who castrates himself and wears a skirt or a dress is simply a mutilated, transvestinal male - not a woman or a female. Similarly, a woman who attaches an appendage resembling a phallus to her crotch and dons a pair of pantaloons, is merely a transvestinal woman with a fake penis between her thighs, and not a man, nor a male, in any accurate sense of the terms. Actually, I would contend that any “man” who excises his reproductive organs was always a dickless “man”, metaphorically speaking.
@@ReverendDr.Thomas you wrote a lot of words to just say women don’t have a Y chromosome. There is the extreme exception of intersexuality which occurs in roughly 1/15th of 1% of people.
Turning point uk, I'm a bit disappointed with you title for that young man, I'll give him a 👏 All he spoke was questions, gave his points critically thinking, assessed, he didn't yell or scream and at the end gave full respect back to Charlie.
Yesterday evening, I witnessed an 11-year-old boy beat a female Team GB Olympic wrestler in training 🤼 In fact he didn't just beat her; he manhandled her 💯 The idea of a mentally ill man competing against women isn't any different from me identifying as a child and winning the under-12's wrestling competition 🥇
James. I remember my brother wrestling. They were so ridget about weight classifications. You know, weighing in before a competition. My brother was small and wrestled at 105 lbs. What if they let a 125 weight person compete with him. Not fair. Just like this crazy stuff.
@@LaurieLT88 You can't be five pounds heavier, but you can have elevated testosterone, greatly increased muscle mass, higher bone density and a set of balls 🤓
I think he should have acknowledged the way that guy asked his question, he was Respectful, That way we can help pull these people out of this Munipulation an back to our side!
We should have more Charlie Kierks in this world! He is so intelligent….probably because he didn’t go to College but is self taught!!! All common sense….dah!
🤣 "Medical breakthrough". Your supposed to be confused throughout puberty, that's kinda part of the point of it! Your supposed to be confused, we all were!
Kudos to the kid for being respectful. That being said. As long as they keep it away from kids and don't cram it down my throat, they have every right to exist.
I like the fact that he seemed to get a bit angry and annoyed for having to explain something that's just an immutable fact. We all need to call BS on this trans crap.
It's amazing that people still have so much faith in the medical "experts" after what we all experienced during COVID. How many times do you have to be lied to until you stop paying attention to what they have to say?
