Тёмный

China's Plan to Establish a Permanent Base on the Moon 

Dongfang Hour
Подписаться 32 тыс.
Просмотров 56 тыс.
50% 1

Go to piavpn.com/DongfangHour to get 83% off Private Internet Access with 4 months free!
While the US and its partners are planning to carry out the Artemis Program in the coming decade, China is preparing the competing "ILRS", aka the International Lunar Research Station. In this episode, we do a deep dive into China's permanent lunar base project and its scientific and political ramifications.
If you like what you see and would like to support me, please consider joining our small Patreon community at / dongfanghour !
We also have some very cool space merch available at shop.dongfanghour.com.
00:00 Artemis and the ILRS (introduction)
00:43 China's Moon Program: Early Beginnings
01:58 Chang'e 1 to Chang'e 6
02:35 First Mention of the ILRS
03:21 Private Internet Access
05:14 The ILRS Becomes a Sino-Russian Project
06:02 ILRS Phase 1 - Moon Base "Basic Model"
06:57 ILRS Phase 2 - Moon Base "Construction Phase"
10:09 How China plans to launch the ILRS hardware
11:20 Can the ILRS become international?

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

2 июл 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 724   
@DongfangHour
@DongfangHour 5 дней назад
Go to piavpn.com/DongfangHour to get 83% off Private Internet Access with 4 months free!
@Theodorus5
@Theodorus5 5 дней назад
Does this work on the Moon tho? ;-)
@youmemeyou
@youmemeyou 4 дня назад
Say NO to western hegemony on the moon🌙!!
@AerialWaviator
@AerialWaviator 4 дня назад
@@Theodorus5 Only if in line sight of Earth, not on the far-side. ;)
@Theodorus5
@Theodorus5 4 дня назад
@@AerialWaviator Glad we are all thinking about these important matters before we go there 😁
@stevoz6743
@stevoz6743 2 дня назад
"Wolf Amendment" is a racist law that trying to exclude the Chinese race. The intention of this law is extremely evil, this also means the US government had no regret of their Chinese Exclusion Act, they were forced to remove it. So no access for US and their allies until they show remorse, and we also need to do hypocrisy check on them before allow them in.
@a.j.ltargaryen5995
@a.j.ltargaryen5995 5 дней назад
Why should they? The US blocked China from entering the ISS. Why do you ask them to forget and forgive?
@privatedata665
@privatedata665 4 дня назад
So many people cry about the Wolf Amendment , comments like yours are very common . No one ever looks at why the Wolf Amendment was passed , now do they ? Also when the ISS was considered and being built , the Russians had far more space technology to offer and at that time , China had almost no space technology to offer the ISS .
@zhz-ur2st
@zhz-ur2st 4 дня назад
Approve
@thechloromancer3310
@thechloromancer3310 4 дня назад
Its is not even about forgiving, it is about not being able to trust the US. I really would not put it past the US to arrange for a sabotage of the Chinese base while the US tries and fails to set up one of their own.
@qwqw-hj1lo
@qwqw-hj1lo 4 дня назад
How ironic
@quisqueyanguy120
@quisqueyanguy120 4 дня назад
Because it will show them as the reasonable partner
@AZ-co4mn
@AZ-co4mn 5 дней назад
China doesn’t need an international team to do what they plan to do. They have been very successful doing by themselves. In the future if some countries want to tag along, it’s fine with China but absolutely not necessary for China to move forward. I have confidence that China can do it by themselves for whatever they plan to do. Their record so far speaks the volumes.❤
@MrBdoleagle
@MrBdoleagle 5 дней назад
I guess China needs some witness for this unbelievable achievements in mankind history, tech alone China can do everything on her own without external help. Artemis program is a different story, participant countries may have budget and some technologies, but the tech challenge is huge and quite risky. It is too early to say who is going to win, but I would bet on team China. lol
@henrykum-nr7bw
@henrykum-nr7bw 5 дней назад
100% agreed
@michaeltse6961
@michaeltse6961 5 дней назад
🎯💯👏👏🙏🙏
@user-dh7yk5kx5g
@user-dh7yk5kx5g 5 дней назад
😊😊😊😊如果其他国家给足中国经费,中国也可以把你们的上帝、真主带到月球,比如在月球上修建清真寺或者教堂,哈哈哈哈。
@riceball4u172
@riceball4u172 5 дней назад
Exactly
@raygan777able
@raygan777able 5 дней назад
International yes. Excluding the US
@kimduong2332
@kimduong2332 4 дня назад
plus the West.
@verypleasantguy
@verypleasantguy 4 дня назад
International without hegemony
@verypleasantguy
@verypleasantguy 4 дня назад
@@kimduong2332 West are excluded
@user-cy3ce1gy7o
@user-cy3ce1gy7o День назад
No indians pls. We must protect the moon from pollution
@-ULXtheSpaceArtist-
@-ULXtheSpaceArtist- День назад
The goal, i think, is to show the us that they made a mistake by banning them from the iss 🤣
@carcinogen60yearsago
@carcinogen60yearsago 5 дней назад
You're my go-to for Chinese space updates.
@Kukura001
@Kukura001 4 дня назад
China's success proves that there are many paths to an advanced future without accepting a single "manifest destiny" value and dominance.
@DanBurgaud
@DanBurgaud 5 дней назад
My money on Team China: USA cannot PRINT the Lunar base, but China can BUILD it.
@OneEyedMonkey9000
@OneEyedMonkey9000 5 дней назад
I think having fewer “international partners “ might be a blessing in disguise. More people = more politics. Not to mention organising gets harder. Also, if what SmarterEveryDay said was true, the Americans are planning to send fuel in lots of smaller rockets into orbit and pump it all into the big tank to make the trip to the moon… 😂
@peaceleader7315
@peaceleader7315 5 дней назад
Printing is cheap... anyhow our socialism_communism economic system as science and innovation is for sharing.. yup.. when over capacity isn't our human nature.
@archigoel
@archigoel 5 дней назад
😄 China is competing with Space X. Once Starship is up and running, its payload capacity will be insane.
@peaceleader7315
@peaceleader7315 5 дней назад
@archigoel our private enterprise will challenge any sovereign government ambitions.. yup... as you already knew that sovereign as definition is simply as land owners.. hmmmm.. 😑
@kennedy6618
@kennedy6618 5 дней назад
@@archigoel Anything is a competition to Karen and Karen has to be the winner...at all cost. America dream!
@sajanbabu8101
@sajanbabu8101 5 дней назад
Well done China,, the technology Giant 💪🏻💪🏻❤
@stenyethanmathews945
@stenyethanmathews945 5 дней назад
For any kind of building venture my bet is on China. Their infrastructure development is just on another level. No other country even comes close.
@stephanieyu6597
@stephanieyu6597 5 дней назад
過奖了!謝謝!!!但我國還須努力.為了星辰大海.路途還漫長呢。這才剛開始。
@Hystericall
@Hystericall 5 дней назад
yes, it's not just technology, but organizational know how. This applies to R&D for the requisite technology as well. China's ability to focus, commit, and organize people and resources is astonishing.
@mike4769
@mike4769 5 дней назад
Tofu dreg?
@hdvoice
@hdvoice 4 дня назад
@@mike4769Yeah….I’m sure.😂
@StillAliveAndKicking_
@StillAliveAndKicking_ 4 дня назад
Err, yeah. That little SpaceX startup just can’t hope to compete with the astonishing powerhouse that is China.
@hkfoo3333
@hkfoo3333 5 дней назад
China should not make it international. Make it purely Chinese and never let US and west access to it
@terry1708
@terry1708 4 дня назад
China will share their soil from moon to many western countries, including US allys like Australia.
@stephanieyu6597
@stephanieyu6597 4 дня назад
但向來大度的中國民族不是這樣想!他們是在為人類将來、志在星辰大海!😁
@LeMaoLeDong
@LeMaoLeDong 4 дня назад
China signed an agreement with Russia and this it has to be “international”. But “international” according to them doesn’t have to include the west.
@ex0duzz
@ex0duzz 4 дня назад
@@hkfoo3333 it is international. But that just means apply through UN. In the end china is the one who decides everything, not UN.
@user-yp2wy2vs8i
@user-yp2wy2vs8i 4 дня назад
Only to China and its allies only.
@AdamJRowen
@AdamJRowen 5 дней назад
Didn’t bring the Chinese when the international station first launches, knocked their application off with various ‘reasons’; guess it’s their term now.
@colinliew1400
@colinliew1400 3 дня назад
Wolf Amendment 2011
@jebes909090
@jebes909090 2 дня назад
the problem is china literally shoves spyware into everything. so the had to kick them off the project.
@gelinrefira
@gelinrefira 5 дней назад
I see Dongfang hour update, I click.
@Kukura001
@Kukura001 4 дня назад
China's success proves that there are many paths to an advanced future without accepting a single "manifest destiny" value and dominance.
@xabiermorales7781
@xabiermorales7781 5 дней назад
I totally understand chinese ppl to build every part of the project infrastructure. China is one of the most important insubordinated countries against anglozionist hegemony ruled by USA at the moment, relegate those construction tasks to other country would be a sustantial high risk due to possible USA interference/sabotajes. From the other side, no one is gonna sabotaje the construction of Artemis infrastructure, since Its USA itself the one that maintains that hegemony over most of the members u mentioned (not all of them are puppets). One more thing Dongfang. I recently saw a reusable rocket done by China that went up 10km. Is there more info I can check about that? Have a nice day and thanks for the video, as always.
@hcjet
@hcjet 5 дней назад
this month, one of reusable rocket operated first time up to 12 kms,check "deep blue" & “landspace” those are typical Chinese civil rocket companies developing reusable rockets
@strongchallenger2269
@strongchallenger2269 5 дней назад
Well said, xabiermorales👍🙏✌️
@mjabb02
@mjabb02 5 дней назад
​@@hcjet that test is not from private company but it is from one of the subsidiary companies from CASC which is SAST. They managed to do 12km VTVL at first test and plan to do 70km VTVL at the second test. Landspace only manage 350m VTVL in their test.
@Kukura001
@Kukura001 4 дня назад
China's success proves that there are many paths to an advanced future without accepting a single "manifest destiny" value and dominance.
@JoseSilveira-newhandleforYT
@JoseSilveira-newhandleforYT 5 дней назад
Thanks for this extended summary of the ambitious Moon project.
@SamLamphong
@SamLamphong 5 дней назад
Why should we Chinese make it international? Just cooperate with our allies, why should we let our enemies join too?
@almighty3372
@almighty3372 4 дня назад
China does not aim to form "allies" but friend group.
@justme6275
@justme6275 4 дня назад
international just in name, friends are welcome.
@LibertyEater
@LibertyEater 4 дня назад
你去过天安门吗?城楼上左边是“中华人民共和国万岁”右边是“世界人民大团结万岁”,中国并没有所谓的“敌人”,美国不是中国的敌人,日本也不是中国的敌人,他们过去和目前的对中国不利的行动只是出于他们当时的政治环境和意识形态做出的表象,只有“按照目前状况无法达成的共识”。落后确实要挨打,我们不指望其他国家高尚,中国依然做好自己,成为世界上最强大的力量,才有能力去完成人类的终极目标。英特纳雄耐尔就一定要实现
@justme6275
@justme6275 4 дня назад
@@LibertyEater 👍👍👍👍👍
@FG-bp4yl
@FG-bp4yl 4 дня назад
@@LibertyEater 天真得近乎幼稚!中国没有把美国和日本视为敌人,但是美国和日本把中国视为敌人啊!结果是一样的:日本和美国,就是中国的敌人!
@3owlpro
@3owlpro 5 дней назад
bravo CHINA !!!!!!!
@fe486225
@fe486225 5 дней назад
东方,你的每一集节目做的都很细致。给你一个赞!
@PinkLittleElephant
@PinkLittleElephant 5 дней назад
Another in-depth objective and entertaining presentation of the Chinese space programme!
@DucaTech
@DucaTech 5 дней назад
I think China is better off going it alone. More partners = more problems
@shadowdragon6639
@shadowdragon6639 5 дней назад
China can do everything alone, but we also need to bring some countries as witnesses, otherwise Uncle Sam will say our work is fake😋
@chiangkohsien9120
@chiangkohsien9120 4 дня назад
@@shadowdragon6639 誰還在乎山姆大叔講的話 只有滿天謊言
@kimduong2332
@kimduong2332 4 дня назад
@@shadowdragon6639 One of Chinese proverbs says: Pure gold is not scared of blue flame burning(真金不惧红炉火)。Fact is fact, no need of witnesses at all.
@qwqw-hj1lo
@qwqw-hj1lo 4 дня назад
China will bring its sponsors in Middle, its strategic partners together
@absolutejewel
@absolutejewel 3 дня назад
Agreed.
@theoz572
@theoz572 5 дней назад
of course,but USA not included
@Stefan-oi9nk
@Stefan-oi9nk 5 дней назад
If I remember right, China had already signed an agreement with Russia for space programs including moon base. Thus, technically, it’d be international.
@thisiskevin1000
@thisiskevin1000 5 дней назад
And more countries, including some who also signed up with the Artemis accord, also joining ILRS
@blcheah2672
@blcheah2672 5 дней назад
'international' doesn't have to mean the same as what the West calls 'international'. Their idea of international is basically themselves and their minions.
@josephguo6256
@josephguo6256 5 дней назад
Russia is not one of the wests. see
@chengxin2928
@chengxin2928 4 дня назад
@@josephguo6256 sino -russo agreement is still international. Russia has no money now to take part in the agreement. Still China will finish the whole project.
@BACA01
@BACA01 4 дня назад
@@chengxin2928 China signed the agreement with Russia because it needs the nuclear reactor that Russia will build for them. As for Russia they have their own space program.
@pleongv1
@pleongv1 5 дней назад
With China speed, I bet on ILRS to be successful and sustainable due to the effectiveness and efficiency of Chinese govt and bureaucracy
@goodcitizen4587
@goodcitizen4587 5 дней назад
Nice presentation with no political bias. Thanks!
@user-hr6tb9fh8k
@user-hr6tb9fh8k 4 дня назад
Even this need to be complemented omg
@vivavivo5071
@vivavivo5071 4 дня назад
Because everything is politicized​ nowadays😅@@user-hr6tb9fh8k
@edem0703
@edem0703 5 дней назад
International except USA
@qingshanyipian1936
@qingshanyipian1936 5 дней назад
Welcome back. Hope you had a wonderful trip. Congratulations
@user-vo8zx2uj1p
@user-vo8zx2uj1p 4 дня назад
Just like tiangong space station international relations in space are good for short term political gains, but they'll only be relevant on the long term when china will have settled on the moon basically by themselves, and while they keep taking market after market and investing into other developing nations space programs, they'll have a direct hand in their activities, so if others countries are interested in space or even the moon they'll quickly realize how out of reach it is for them, they'll have no choice but to depend on china, that's a smart move no matter what you think of it because at least that will allow them to use another country infrastructure to access places and ressources unavailables otherwise, this is some immenses long term political gains for china. Btw artemis is a joke you don't need to be smart to figure that out, this week they just lost a contract made with collins aerospace to develop suits for the artemis program, the thing is it's the most experienced company in the u.s that do that, and the actual suits are now way too old they had to cancel an operation on the iss because of leaks, on the chineses part everything is moving out just fine if not ahead of schedule, on the western part everything go from bad to worse; Missions of scientific nature are getting freezed or cancelled. Starship is showing limitations when it didn't even reached leo. Starliner is full of leak and boeing is about to disappear as things go on. Clps missions are nothing but failures. The european union nations are about to collapse economically and the u.s might follow within a few years. While china did build up a lot of experience and keep their plans ongoing, nasa lost it all in half a century of inactivity on the moon. Orion spacecraft still have issues of unknown nature that make the re entry shield unsuitable for a manned mission to occur And not last but i'm going to stop there because i don't want to write a comment that may actually be deleted for no reasons, an inactive russian satellite exploded forcing the iss crew to prepare to evacuate the station asap just in case as the satellite was on iss orbit. And they really don't need that. Nothing actually go well on the american side and the progress of the manned spaceflight part are really limited and we've yet to know if hls starship is even feasible, nothing is made seriously there that's for sure, and i don't talk about the lunar settlement part, nothing currently exist that even look like a plan, there's no architecture, and we're not even a decade away from the moment they're supposed to have a base? At some point the various countries that signed the artemis accords (mostly because of the legendary pressure the petty us gov is capable of) will have to tear up the whole thing if they want to collaborate with china, not because china will forbid it's partners to work with the us, but because the u.s will forbid the ones they see as pawns to work with china.
@raindear811
@raindear811 5 дней назад
Awesome episode thanks for the update!
@meilingfoo8771
@meilingfoo8771 3 дня назад
Thank you for the update, Jean...❤
@kmich7660
@kmich7660 5 дней назад
The answer is a no brainer. Any country except the exceptional country, exceptionally troublesome.😊
@r3dpowel796
@r3dpowel796 5 дней назад
Its not about who is 1st on the moon but who will last on the moon.
@bengong4383
@bengong4383 5 дней назад
It’s not how you start that’s important but how you finish.
@Astra2
@Astra2 5 дней назад
@@bengong4383 But the bases are meant to be permanent?
@ssrae-2229
@ssrae-2229 5 дней назад
@@Astra2 .should be Last longer .😄
@gelinrefira
@gelinrefira 5 дней назад
The US was not even first on most space exploration achievements. The Soviet Union was the one that did most of the achievements.
@BSnicks
@BSnicks 5 дней назад
​@@gelinrefiraThe US was the first to use Hollywood for space exploration. It will also be the last.
@lagrangewei
@lagrangewei 5 дней назад
Artemis is a conjob. you do not need gateway if you have starship, and if you have gateway you do not need starship. both system requires considerable resources and you will be left with nothing to land on the moon with. the reality is most NASA staffer are only interested to go to mars, this is why they build the gateway, it is a demostration for long term flight outside the van allen belt. they only shoehorn the gateway to the moon mission since the congress is only willing to fund that. I am betting on China establishing the moonbase first as they have no selfish intention hidden among their space administrators... NASA pet project is too big of a drain, not just on money but more importantly time.
@raideepu4
@raideepu4 4 дня назад
Yeah it may take a bit longer for China but China still can do unimaginable things even if China is alone in space race. Proud of China!
@trekpac2
@trekpac2 5 дней назад
China’s plans over the next 15 years are so exciting. It is quite unbelievable, really, to think of it all coming together! And the Chinese consortium will do it on time and on budget, totally leaving the EU and the US behind.
@stephanieyu6597
@stephanieyu6597 4 дня назад
這話留給别人說.我們中國人自己只需用行動.和實力說話就成.比如今天的嫦娥六號我所看到視頻可以說絶大多數的人和媒體都给我們祖國的肯定和贊揚.!我看到了.就是一種享受!😁
@yeaonaiwohe
@yeaonaiwohe 18 часов назад
不是财团哦,我们的航天不是由财团控制的哦
@SWilford
@SWilford 4 дня назад
China’s space programme including the latest Chang-E 6 was on target on schedule working with Sweden, France and Pakistan launching their respective satellites to the moon. They schedule the moon sampling trip to 53 days returning as planned on 25 June performing all the difficult step by step operations flying to the moon, releasing the moon lander, sampler, ascender, rendezvous with the returner, transfer sample, returning to earth orbit and landed at the predetermined location. It is meticulously planned with advance communication relay satellite, appropriate adjustment of flight direction and very successful transparent outcome. When comparing with NASA’s Starliner with all the problems and delay at the moment, it is a such a huge gap between the two countries. Considering for many years, US has been trying hard to stall China’s space technological advancement without success.
@cloverpower4662
@cloverpower4662 5 дней назад
这集质量很高,全部介绍了所有的信息,画面也对
@amelia_lix3314
@amelia_lix3314 3 дня назад
Congrats! New Video!
@hirakawa1979
@hirakawa1979 4 дня назад
Not possible to be international. It is like you built a house and you will only invite good friends to visit.
@bayernvoeller
@bayernvoeller 5 дней назад
CIA - ' China has destroyed NASA Apollo Mission landing site, leaving no trace of American Astronaut on the Moon surface !!! '
@chiangkohsien9120
@chiangkohsien9120 4 дня назад
哈哈哈哈哈😂
@persophone4554
@persophone4554 5 дней назад
It can be international; but as the US didn't want them on the International Space Station, no doubt everything will be written and communicated in Chinese! The lunar "gps" will no doubt be based on Chinese standards. Good luck to them.
@NEVERSTOPFKUSA
@NEVERSTOPFKUSA 3 дня назад
the budget comparison shows perfectly the theory behind 2 moon exploration programs (ILRS vs Artemis), that is ILRS serves/focus on developing countries, where Artemis aims only developed countries. US also weaponize Artemis program to against ILRS and probably has exclusive rules that force its participant can only join one instead of the other. A very American way. So, it's not China willing to make ILRS more international or not, it's US should be criticized to its insane "cold war" mindset and "space race" mindset.
@JB52520
@JB52520 День назад
I'm a US citizen, but I'm really psyched about China's progress. I can't wait to see what such a determined and harmonious people can achieve.
@arjunraj823
@arjunraj823 4 дня назад
India's next Chandrayan 4 is a sample return mission from Moon. Before that Mangalyan 2 (Mars orbiter mission 2 ) will be launched. Now the agency is fully concentrated on human space flight. Also a reusable space shuttle concept is in the initial stages.
@richardbloemenkamp8532
@richardbloemenkamp8532 3 дня назад
Great video as always. I'm always happy to hear more details about Chinese progress.
@miaodu1695
@miaodu1695 5 дней назад
🎉the return of the king! Long time no...update😂❤
@mirror452
@mirror452 5 дней назад
ILRS will pick up steam once it becomes obvious that it works, and once the Global South develops their economies enough to be interested in space exploration. This also addresses the point of whether China will entrust other countries with constructing critical modules. There's a fundamental difference between the western program, which brings together countries with already established space industries, and China's program, which will include many countries with no prior experience. This project is also about tech transfers as much as anything else. And that's something the West just doesn't do (or in a very limited and politicized way).
@GL-iv4rw
@GL-iv4rw 5 дней назад
Copyright is becoming obsolete
@goddyfame3424
@goddyfame3424 5 дней назад
China only need one country to join the Moon Base for it to be international. It has more than 10. China has the tech to land and lift off the moon so it has every thing it needs to build the base. The question is Are they two moon bases targeting the same location? If so, then it is indeed a war.
@Xind0898
@Xind0898 4 дня назад
To be honest, China along can handle all the aspect of aerospace program, it has 10 million graduates this year along, and 1/3 of it are of engineer/math/physics background. there is enugh human capital in China to fuel almost all industry segments.
@MrAsugtv
@MrAsugtv 5 дней назад
Finally! We really miss your videos. This is very cool, please don't disappear.
@DongfangHour
@DongfangHour 5 дней назад
Thanks for the kind words ☺️ This video took a while to make…
@thisiskevin1000
@thisiskevin1000 5 дней назад
@@DongfangHourAnd verifications from multiple sources
@stephanieyu6597
@stephanieyu6597 5 дней назад
​@@DongfangHour沒有雑質、客觀.精彩!👍👍👍
@Linqunfeng
@Linqunfeng 4 дня назад
We have an old saying in China,... what you say you do, your deeds will bear fruit. .....
@qqfill3381
@qqfill3381 4 дня назад
thanks for sharing. very clear.
@artyerlich3514
@artyerlich3514 4 дня назад
The only moon USA astronauts walked on was in Hollywood😂
@JenniferA886
@JenniferA886 3 дня назад
Great videos 👍👍👍
@ronhumble7793
@ronhumble7793 Час назад
Nice job!
@goddyfame3424
@goddyfame3424 5 дней назад
Being international doesn't need extra adjectives. China's plan is indeed international and doesn't necessarily need to be. The idea of "Trully being" is a mental flaw and doubt of your ability to do something you already prove you can do cost effectively.
@thorin1045
@thorin1045 5 дней назад
if russia an belorus does something together it is international in the strict meaning of the word, but not in the actual sense. if the nasa and esa work together it is international, but not really. heck, the esa alone is interntional, yet not. so there is several level of international, depending on whether only your puppets, your dependencies or actual different and mostly independent nations do it.
@goddyfame3424
@goddyfame3424 5 дней назад
@@thorin1045 The only part of International collab with regards to Moon Bose that is necessary is Funding. If the Moon can pay for the moon base, then International collab is not necessary. Those who need it are those who have everything to gain from it. For example, Pakistan needs rockets to put payloads in space or on the moon. They can pay CNSA to transport their payload. What does CNSA need from Pakistan?
@thorin1045
@thorin1045 4 дня назад
@@goddyfame3424 pakistan spend more on maintaining their nukes than anyone on space other than the usa, so no, pakistan does not need help to go to moon, just don't want to spend on that stuff if others already did that and the benefit of any space activity beyond satellites are the prestige you get from your flag on the crafts and presentations. actual income from the moon is unlikely in this century.
@rogerc7960
@rogerc7960 5 дней назад
Good stuff
@Jeff-fz2nh
@Jeff-fz2nh 4 дня назад
Before talking about competitions, let’s see if the West Artemis project could actually softly deliver some working equipments to the moon surface.
@phatlu5892
@phatlu5892 4 дня назад
Thank you 🙏
@cedricmcarthur2448
@cedricmcarthur2448 4 дня назад
little mistake about the date at 0:46 (2023 instead of 2003) but great content all around! Keep up the great quality.
@Facts..Checker
@Facts..Checker 4 дня назад
Even Eskimo is welcomed but US. Due to national security taught by US.
@RP-mm9ie
@RP-mm9ie 16 часов назад
love how you narrate
@user-yz3bu7dl8c
@user-yz3bu7dl8c 4 дня назад
Our country actually doesn't need help from other countries. The so-called international cooperation is just our generosity in saying 'let's include you as well.
@user-vg3ic1lk4x
@user-vg3ic1lk4x 4 дня назад
Why China build their base should open to all?
@MrBdoleagle
@MrBdoleagle 5 дней назад
very objective observation and analysis without political bias, great video
@MrBdoleagle
@MrBdoleagle 4 дня назад
I would ask my son watch this video, he loves science too and has strong interest in astronomy 🪐
@kumbackquatsta
@kumbackquatsta 5 дней назад
always a treat when you post, jean. post more!
@user-lj7bd2cb4q
@user-lj7bd2cb4q 5 дней назад
good video!love from china
@ascoaptwwasmqx2840
@ascoaptwwasmqx2840 5 дней назад
China welcomes cooperation with western countries, unfortunately many of the western countries are either American colony such as German or American vassals such as France. China understand their fear of the Americans and had let it so and its up to the European themselves to decide.
@bowang4277
@bowang4277 4 дня назад
well i just remenber the International Space Station don't allow china join the project, even russians in.
@Lastpost9
@Lastpost9 5 дней назад
International yes, America , EU, UK not INVITED.
@user-wb8nh5vz6v
@user-wb8nh5vz6v 4 дня назад
No country will be invited to cooperate, but if you are willing, you can apply to join.
@ubermenschen3636
@ubermenschen3636 4 дня назад
@ 12:08 , two notable countries among the 12 that joined ILRS program: Nicaragua, a very small Central America nation with a bigger space exploration ambition and Turkey, NATO nation that jettisoning earth politic for the wonder of extraterrestrial exploration.
@kv4302
@kv4302 3 дня назад
your audio sounds very "wet" and is kinda difficult to listen to for those of us afflicted with the misophonia, is it possible to fix that? love your channel and space news from china is very important!
@AerialWaviator
@AerialWaviator 4 дня назад
Excellent presentation. Chang'e 6 did deploy ICUBE-Q, a Pakistani lunar remote sensing observation satellite. The countries first lunar mission. It will be fascinating to watch what international cooperation develops regarding Tiangong (Chinese Space Station) over next few years. Experiments, and partner crew/visitors. This might foreshadow active lunar partnerships. One challenge with Tiangong is it's lower inclination (41.5º vs. 51.5º for ISS) which makes it more challenging/impossible(?) for Russia to launch rockets to from its current launch locations. Russia launched the first ISS module, Zarya in November 1998, which ultimately determined ISS's orbital inclination. So having space launch partners does have some geo-political and logistical implications dependent on Earth.
@bentony7548
@bentony7548 4 дня назад
oh wait,when britis went to australia for the first time hundreds years ago ,did they invite china to come to australia to share the land and own the huge island together?
@oyoter9ox
@oyoter9ox 5 дней назад
Anyone except the Anglo-Saxon
@ulaikamor
@ulaikamor 4 дня назад
Certainly the Artemis program has many more relevant countries when it comes to space exploration, which in the end puts them at an advantage compares to the ILRS program. Regardless, China can't participate in the ILRS and, given how the US always made sure China can't partner with US space endeavors EVER, China will move ahead all on its own.
@5AMA5
@5AMA5 4 дня назад
From what I understand it really seems like a bunch of ground robotic mission cooperating together in the same area but not like a real crewed base. Yes, maybe some crew will land in this area but it does seems like the base is just here to bring support to extend the duration and capabilities of landing mission. The name "base" seems very misleading
@spiketwo666
@spiketwo666 4 дня назад
Yada, Yada loser
@PinkLittleElephant
@PinkLittleElephant 5 дней назад
At 0:45 the screen caption is wrong... Should say 2003
@DongfangHour
@DongfangHour 5 дней назад
Ah thanks! Too late to change this now… 😔
@absolutejewel
@absolutejewel 3 дня назад
As we speak, the two US astronauts are still stranded in the ISS.
@catonpillow
@catonpillow 5 дней назад
Can the ILRS become international? No reason not to. Сhina has plenty of friends among the BRICS+, SCO and BRI member states who can be invited and be more than happy to join the program.
@devendraangbo5830
@devendraangbo5830 4 дня назад
Good luck 🤞
@morgan1719
@morgan1719 5 дней назад
Congratulations China, this is your century.
@thisiskevin1000
@thisiskevin1000 5 дней назад
Is it possible the use of SMR (small modular reactors) or pebble bed/breeder type reactors for the ILRS?
@gelinrefira
@gelinrefira 5 дней назад
I am quite sure China is exploring nuclear power in space.
@thisiskevin1000
@thisiskevin1000 5 дней назад
@@gelinrefirain partnership with Russia under the ILRS framework
@CityOfTinyLines
@CityOfTinyLines 4 дня назад
Come on countries!!! You can do it!!!!
@SteppeNomad585
@SteppeNomad585 5 дней назад
It’s not surprising that western countries didn’t want to join the ILR. Western countries have their own traditions and space programs. China needs to focus on countries that have some space capabilities and do want to join the ILR.
@RichardBrett899
@RichardBrett899 5 дней назад
Can NASA trust Boeing to build a moon base? Can the world trust NASA without Hollywood's assistance?
@goddyfame3424
@goddyfame3424 5 дней назад
Budget size doesn't matter when the mission is specific and has fixed budget range. For example, a man who has 10K can buy a car, so can a man with 100k. The car has a fixed price so their financial status is irrellevant to their ability to get what they want.
@davidz7858
@davidz7858 4 дня назад
Definitely it is international base, but not include US
@syoushiro1837
@syoushiro1837 2 дня назад
Does the international space station program have China?
@genli4245
@genli4245 2 дня назад
No, because The Wolf Amendment.
@retroas2683
@retroas2683 4 дня назад
It's Russian/Chinese station. Not just Chinese.
@jamesdonaghy9143
@jamesdonaghy9143 5 дней назад
How are they getting through the radiation belts?
@johnnyq4260
@johnnyq4260 5 дней назад
If you build it, they will come.
@a22226565
@a22226565 19 часов назад
10:24 it should be Falcon Heavy not Falcon 9 !
@freakmoister
@freakmoister 5 дней назад
Visa for Guanghan Palace please
@saellenx3528
@saellenx3528 4 дня назад
I think that relying on too many countries in this case is not an advantage but a disadvantage. What if one or two fail at their tasks or deliver bad products? It could ruin the entire mission and possibly cause deaths. The Chinese are smart to do all the work themselves and take only some instruments from others that cannot jeopardize a mission.
@jogo798
@jogo798 3 дня назад
Gateway is postponed right?
@user-qe9bc8rk1v
@user-qe9bc8rk1v 4 дня назад
Just remember that contrary to popular misconception in the West, "International" does not mean "with the G7".
@stupidwars88
@stupidwars88 4 дня назад
My crystal ball tells me that Artemis will be beset with problems like funding & delays and the ILRS will have a higher chance of happening on schedule.
@Ronolein
@Ronolein 5 дней назад
Danke für diese News, sie sind wie immer sehr interessant. Es ist sehr schade das die USA eine Zusammenarbeit mit China weiterhin blockiert und die ESA in Europa ist zur Zeit auch nicht handlungsfähig. Wenn Russland wieder handlungsfähig ist, wird es sicher wieder interessant.
@mike4769
@mike4769 5 дней назад
Nice try. No Germans talk like this.
@Ronolein
@Ronolein 4 дня назад
@@mike4769 Ach ja ich habe schon gehört das im Ausland behauptet wird, die Deutschen haben ihr Hirn an die Amis verkauft. Aber nicht Alle. Es gibt noch Einige die ein wenig Durchblick bewahrt haben.
@jibinjohn8871
@jibinjohn8871 4 дня назад
@0:48 seconds typo October 2023!
@jonaspete
@jonaspete 3 дня назад
Those Reds and their shenanigans.
@ZhipengCheng
@ZhipengCheng 4 дня назад
What is internationalization? It is necessary to have the United States and Europe to call internationalization?
@trump_ivanka
@trump_ivanka 4 дня назад
yes, excluding usa
Далее
How China Reinvented The Space Station!
19:09
Просмотров 1,1 млн
Penalty: Portugal - Slovenia
02:03
Просмотров 1,3 млн
1❤️
00:17
Просмотров 7 млн
How China Built a Semiconductor Industry
27:37
Просмотров 133 тыс.
Why China's Shenzhou is Better Than Russia's Soyuz
16:27
I Was Wrong About China... So I Came Back 🇨🇳
28:17
Why EV Tariffs Won't Stop Chinese Cars
10:43
Просмотров 1,4 млн
Economist explains why India can never grow like China
23:47
China is Building a Lunar Satellite Constellation
6:54
ИГРОВОВЫЙ НОУТ ASUS ЗА 57 тысяч
25:33