Cirrus Vision Jet G2 Flight Trial 

very expensive transition

yeah

$$$$$ , buy a bigger faster one.

More likely speculators buying early slots so they can price gouge once demand soars.

This is a great question. I doubt it

Well since you are squawking 7700, and it sends out a declaration to tower. You’ll get granted clearance first

@Kelp Farming 😄.. they would still starve if i didnt..

The real question is who gets to log it? Garmin? lol

@@tonyunderwood9438 of course and Garmin will log it as PIC. lol

@@tonyunderwood9438 obviously Jarvis

Unlikely. Just because the jet can land safely doesn't mean that the FAA is going to approve that pilot to fly. I don't think the FAA would approve a pilot to fly a jet and no other type of aircraft due to a medical issue.

Yeah but the FAA won't

No, you still need a valid medical.

Harvey Cohen because cirrus is good at marketing... and they can up sell existing customers who are flying sr-22s

This is a very strange question. Put a bitten apple on the fuselage and there'd be 5000 orders.

He has a great tdm already that’s more mission ready to his needs that turboprop he has is amazing

hell yes!!

Although it may not meet your needs, it does have some unique features, that are not available (to my knowledge) on any turbo prop. BRS (like them or not), they are a USP for Cirrus aircraft. Add the latest flight control electronics that can auto land the aircraft (initiated by a passenger), in case of an incapacitated pilot. The closest aircraft I can think of that has such an easy starting system is the PC12 (latest version), although that is a lot more expensive and larger.

Clive Sinclair and it’s got a parachute

With any single engine plane (turbine or otherwise) the pilot has the option to attempt an emergency landing in the event of an engine failure, but with both Cirrus piston and jet aircraft the pilot also has the option to pull the chute to get on the ground safely.

It has parachute

It’s a g1 in x plane 11 as far as I’m aware.

Exactly...........many such cases

when ADA touch 100 dollar i will buy a cirrus and tmb 940 e.e

I think so since it has a particular deployment

Negative. The B-roll you saw was lagged a touch with the actual standup audio, and the frame shows the aircraft's speed just after level-off from the long climb. When the autopilot trimmed it and the airplane settled into cruise, it made 303 true.

@@AVweb Ok, thanks, it just didn't show.

@NonyaBusiness! If you have the cash..... That's the thing. If you pony up close to 3 million dollars for a plane (including taxes and sales commissions) a few hundred dollars an hour is nothing. Keep in mind the million-plus you save buying used. Those savings will easily buy many thousands of gallons of JetA with very generous amounts left over for a paint job and an overhaul or two. Look at many of the used small jets for sale and you'll notice that few have any significant hours on them. You are looking at toys for the wealthy who become bored or no longer willing to invest time into remaining current and move on to the next adventure. Remember, there are a lot of people who can purchase these things with no more financial strain that you would have buying a Happy Meal.

Not an issue in this airplane. It has yaw stability augmentation, and the autopilot's yaw servo automatically engages on the initial climb. No tail wag.

On top with one vs two on the side. Doesn’t seem to me like it would be that big of a difference?

That’s why the tail is as tall as the Empire State Building, to get ride of that.

Sure we could. The braking mode was disabled in this airplane when we flew it last fall. The company made the decision to not demo the braking when the airplane was away from its home-base test environment.

@@AVweb I did the first annual inspection on that SF50 you were flying. Right after the inspection it went back to cirrus to get the executive center console thing and the "fly me home safe" system installed.

Of course you can. But this one is new and a lot of people like to buy new panes.

Good point and of course the problem with a passenger plane is its enormous mass. The airframe basically *falls* out of sky to land. There is no such thing as a *controlled descent* in a commercial plane.

Andrew Doolittle that’s...absolutely not true in the slightest 😂

Some commercial jets are already implementing/implemented this concept for emergencies when the pilot and copilot are disabled from landing or flying the aircraft

@@clickenpie also false but okay

@@v1_rotate638 airbus a220 has already achieved cat 3 autoland. So they are already STARTING to implement this. Concepthyper never said it was fully in the systems.

I go back and forth with the TBM and the Vision Jet as our next one. Number one reason the Cirrus Jet is still in the discussion is the chute. Momma really likes the chute and momma gets what momma wants. ;-)

Tony Underwood I’m on the sAme page Tony. Having a chute on to- of having auto land... there is no comparison for he safety for me and my loved ones. Rugs technology will be forced into higher end jets in the future

Its about getting for a to b safely not hand flying around the lake on a Sunday. They dont want too many GA knuckleheads crashing them

60 gallons/h on cruise, Not even many pistons do 16/h gallons on high speed cruise and this is a turbofan.

glishskiii same

Но она очень милая

Craneman да))) Особенно, когда сама не может осознать происходящего, будто первый раз в самолете)))

@@liamhygge Я согласен, она выглядела нервной и растерянной.

Craneman а ты потерянным и запутавшимся. Ибо что ты делаешь в этом видосе? Это ж надо его найти и попасть на просмотр еще

By marrying a non-average person

The average person doesn't.

The only reason it's noisy in the cabin is because the aircraft is so small, the engine is soo close to cabin to the cabin. Plus, it's one of the cheapest jets you could buy, they don't put thick 100% noise reducing walls in the aircraft. They use whatever material is best for the price.

Xperim and lowest price

@NonyaBusiness! You can get a Eclipse 550 for around $2.5 million.

@@Xperim... if you do some research the eclipse alot of negatives. The theory of the airframe and ownership mision is great but in reality their production is limited by lack of funds, they have two projects (kestrel turboprop and eclipse canada) that have been on the books for years and neither have shown much progress, again due to lack of money. The company is basically seen as on the verge on bankruptcy most the time by many in the industry. As for the current or older aircraft they have a history of issues including the avidyne avionics suite being tempermental to say the least.

Dumb as hell try that at the wrong altitude and see don’t you pass out disabling you from pulling the chute, or worse you get sucked into an engine or killed by a turboprop. You’re not a genius there are reasons people aren’t just carrying parachutes 🪂 stop watching so many movies.

@@WattsUpDev Dumb? Really? There's several hundred 737 max passengers that would have took that option if given the chance. 3,000 more who worked in WTC.#1 & #2 Commercial Plane Seat cushions should be back -pack parachutes with a snack, drink, and blow-up flotation devise inside. 138 IQ is closer to genius, than moronic dumb ass.......A lot closer.

@Stool Postssubstantiate that claim

rayism 24b Stupidity is something you can’t debate with.

@@WattsUpDev Don't see "stupid" nor "debate" mentioned in this thread. Why would you?

Specifics?

You just mentioned a bunch random jets that either no longer exist or lack certification

RIP to Kobe, Gianna and all the other people who passed on that day. But this wouldn't have worked for Kobe, because he needed the helicopter to be able to take off and land anywhere like his backyard, daughters gym, his doctor's office the bank etc... You can't do that with a jet.