Copping Out On A Camper 

Entitled know it alls...

I can tell you out of my own experience in this regards. A very good lawyer (known to win cases where they are defending criminals), that my cousin got to sue me for my fathers inheritance, created a fake image of me at the start of the hearing and made my cousin look like an an angel. Why? Because it's the easiest way to manipulate a judge's decision (due to how confirmation bias works). As the case progressed, no matter how much proof we got, the judge simply didn't want to understand nor did she pay much attention to it, while she completely disregarded the mistakes made by the other side. What kind of mistakes you ask? For instance.. They didn't have any actual proof but they had many witnesses. All of them were repeating the same thing (that they were family friends, that they knew my father, that he loved my cousin, etc. word by word) - all of it was suspicious, but one of the witnesses made it even more obvious. While he was giving his statement, he kept looking at a piece of paper infront of him. The judge asked him to give her the paper and then she proceeded to read it. They were instructions of what to say and how to answer if the judge asked something in particular. Funny enough, the whole thing didn't even get recorded during the case for one reason or another. The case kept going on for months. And at some point I simply just couldn't take it anymore, since it's EXTREMELY infuriating when you simply KNOW that the other side is lying and that the judge already formed an opinion and doesn't want to listen to you at all. At some point, when I was able to answer the judges questions, I addressed both the judge and the snake lawyer directly by saying that the other side was lying in court since day one, but since the judge was manipulated, she is now clearly too blind to see it. We later on had to change the judge. Now, not only the case still isn't closed after years - we also have several more cases open, with one of them being on supreme court - due to suspicion of jurisdiction corruption.

judges shouldn't have egos that guide them **shrug

@@lawfullucyless6715 yeah but they're human so while some might be able to remain neutral, some may not. Besides, it takes nothing to be polite in most circumstances

@@KaiCluster holy hell! Okay, in a situation like that, I would struggle greatly to be polite

🤣🤣🤣

🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂

A Karen, if provoked. Like most Karen's.

A troll with a goblin husband lol

It's a shame this is all arbitration and she couldn't be held in contempt 😅

...boomers....

@@utterbluedragon I'm a boomer and I think they were crazy. How about the attitude/s of the kids that were never (or rarely) told "no," because it would "forever hurt their precious egos?"

Poor husband. Looks 90 he is only 67

@@phillippepym1560 he's 67?!?!? Could've sworn 80 at least! She looks 70s. Rich Karen and Kevin

Probably that's how she speaks to her husband, and thinks it's okay to do the same to others

you know what they call people like her? …say it with me… KAREN

Her partner reminds me of my father who has alzheimers. He also looks like he's a jerk who spends all his time on his ass and praying for death. His wife is grotesque.

W

So outrageous. Both old bats

@@deenana27 it’s wild bc their generation complains about how dumb & rude the younger generations are when half of them are just as bad as full grown adults lmao

The timing matters. She was looking at the papers Karen gave her. It is not possible to listen and read. Karen lost because she didn't know when to SHUT UP.

I Loved that line!

@@michaeldose2041 Karen lost the case because she couldn’t prove her case, in contrast to the plaintiff, who actually could provide some evidence (like the document the judge read that made clear that the mentioned months were not payed). The attitude of both defendants did not earn them any ‘Likability Points’, but this judge most certainly rules based on legality and evidence in her cases.

You said it perfectly. I agree 100%.

Yes! That’s exactly what I felt watching her, but you said it much better than I could have. 👍

Ha ha ha you called her a harpy !

Just awful people. Especially the 6th grade harpie! Haha

I agree. I use to be friends with this man in his late 60s, I was in my 30s at the time...anyway, I would seldom question him on things he said bc I assumed he was wiser than me. Boy was I wrong! We stayed friends for 5-7 years and I discovered just bc someone is much older than you does not mean they are wiser or have better insight to life or advice.

Maybe moving it to their property was the problem, not storing it there. DUH!

@@patcarlson11 So they couldn’t get a tow truck in six years??

why is no one asking: for all the time the RV was at the plaintiff's repair facility . . . why was it never repaired?

i could never understand that degree of entitlement. its really strange.

@@tthom2459 The reason why the RV was never repaired is because the repair they requested was not the problem.

@Leigh Hartman I totally agree !! The moment he opened his mouth !!

😂😂😂😂😆😆😆

🤣🤣🤣😂😂

😂😂 I just sprayed out my soda all over myself🤧😂😂

Omg 😂😂

😂😅

Hi Australia! Blessings from Kansas USA!! 🪴🌾

Same in the US but she was just so nice she kept it

I completely agree with you I don’t know what it’s like in other states but here in W.A I think it’s about 28 days you have until it’s classed as abandoned property and they can either keep it or dispose of it unless there is an agreement of some sorts

Lol exactly. Us Australians are usually nice to a fault re storing other people's shit, but any kind of unrepaired/towed vehicle left on a lot.... omg they sting you BIG TIME here!

Same in the US. The plaintiff was just being overly nice about it. The defendants took advantage of that.

Got me, too. An auto electrical engineer would be able to tell you in a few minutes if it would 'go on fire.' 🙄 lol

I love that they prefaced that with saying it wasn’t fixed, then said they don’t know. Bums

Lol same. Maybe it'll "go on fire" in their driveway now... 🔥 #karma

She kept saying she wanted it to be fixed not just stored

I thought the same thing. Combine that with her comment that they don't know what to do with it and can't get rid of it. They were taking advantage of it being someone elses problem

Even if you grab the nearest blue crayon and roll of toilet paper, always have a contract or bill of sale/receipt for ANYTHING, feel like 90% of these people have watched People's Court or any other court show and still don't have proper documentation to back up their cases

Yes

@Audio Freak It may be. It is in good repair and new ones can cost up to $200,000. + now.

It doesn't matter what they cost. They depreciate from the day it is driven off the lot. Maybe worth half in two years if in excellent condition. They do three things wonderfully. 1) Suck fuel at a rate of 8mpg. $200 to fill up, gets you about 300 miles. 2) Leak and rot. Its not if it starts leaking, its when. 3) Kill a large swath of grass where you park it in your BACK yard. Most cities don't allow parking it in front. Has to be behind the front line of home.

I agree. I know the defendants were rude, maybe that doesn’t apply to this case. But I hate it when she’s asking people questions, and then cuts them off. Sometimes I wonder what’s the point of asking if you’re just going to talk over them. Then she tells people to stop talking when people talk over her, I just don’t understand. She’s a great judge, very smart, but I just don’t understand the concept of that.

I agree too. She does this a lot.

@@arile13700 I used to think that too but I have since worked out it doesn't matter what the people say. The judge goes by what the law says. if people say they paid cash and have no records then the fact is they cant support their claim so they lose.

He's annoying lol