Cruella's New Backstory Revealed! 

Cool

Honestly, and hear me out in this, I think Disney wants to remake 101 Dalmatians as a sequel to Cruella.

If love putting some else needs ahead of yours . Then after. Betraying Meleficant. Was taking tole on the king's mental health . His daughter. Bring him some salvation. But he had to spend time away from her miss her growing up to protect her

hi, idk if you do video requests, but this is something I'm very passionate about so I want to mention it. I'm a huge fan of Big Hero 6, and I'd love to see you talk about Big Hero 6 the series, because in my opinion it's a severely underrated show, and I'm curious to know the opinions of other Disney fans about it. Also what your opinion is on season 3 because I and a lot of others were pretty disappointed by it. Love your channel ❤

Ok

Smoking is bad they didn’t wanna promote it probably

what about an incense stick?

I remember Glenn Close Cruella smoking and I wasn't rushing out to imitate that. Lol.

@@SharpDesign different times

@@SharpDesign kids are more impressionable nowadays

Yea I think she have been have hatred since she was young I think the hatred already manifested already she didn’t use it yet

It could also be, she already have the Idea of skinning spotted dogs, because of that spotted coat she wore to make the baroness think she was wearing her dogs. After she killed those 3 dogs, she probably still hates them, her thirst of turning dogs into clothes for fashion only grew later on.

but why wouls she give anita and roger dogs just to take their puppies? Why didn't she just keep them??

@@farinatasmia9134 she doesn’t like dogs and the money to take care of them because she want to make wool and kill them

@@cecaniacc9165 true

Interesting.

Unique theory

Except most evil people takes pleasure in their vile deeds and some are aware that they're doing things wrong but don't care about it and takes pride in it.

True, but for Cruella it doesn't work. What made her such a good villian was how pure evil and sadistic she was, and while you can give a villian a sympathetic backstory and still have them turn out horribly evil, they didn't seem to do that here. They completely changed Cruella into a completely sympathetic character. The problem, imo, isn't that they gave her a sympathetic backstory, but that they didn't do it in a WAY that works for Cruella. And the fact that it doesn't seem to tie completely into 101D is unsatisfying and confusing. If they were going for an AU angle, they did a poor job, because it doesn't feel like that. It feels like they wanted to make a canon backstory for the original Cruella, but that they accidentally wrote too many things into the story that didn't completely line up. And I mean this just as far as character development moreso than actual events, which SHOULD be the most important part of a story, the part that drives it. A character driven story is better written than one driven by a plot driven one. What I mean is the characters should drive the plot, the plot shouldn't drive the characters. My point is that since the original 101D was such a well-written story, character development drove the story (not as much as it could have but well enough) and it's super important to the story, so if what seems like it's supposed to be a prequel doesn't have character development that lines up, it's pretty jarring.

@@DavidBContentExtravaganza3967 yes, and that's exactly what made Cruella such a good villian. Often you want your villian to be truly evil and extremely hateable, because it gives the story more of an edge; it makes the stakes feel higher and hating the villian more gets you more invested in the story and more on the heros' side, which is usually (especially in movies) a good thing. It can add to the story and make it MORE compelling to give the villian more depth, but if their evil nature is stripped away or diluted in the process, the story becomes less compelling and the villian feels less iconic. At the same time, a story with a flat, cliche villian who does things just because can be boring, which is why writing characters is so complex, and it's super important to have a balance when writing them, which is a different type of balance depending on the role they play in the story. Villians should be interesting but still evil. A balance should have been struck between making Cruella sympathetic and evil, which is totally possible (you can even look to real life for examples of this; most of the most evil serial killers had tragic childhoods, but still turned out to be completely evil people), but the new Cruella obviously failed to strike that balance and in making Cruella sympathetic, they nearly took away the fact she's a villian at all.

I learn that nobody was born evil they actually learn it from people honestly

@@lloyddragon2036 i liked and at the same time didn't like what they did for Cruella's backstory. the movie i actually enjoyed a lot. but i think what ruined it the most was that yeah it didn't stay fully true to the 101D movie. I didn't mind them giving Cruella a sympathetic backstory, because in most cases no one is really born evil, it really comes down to what environment they grew up in, and for Cruella to turn out evil makes sense because she went through a lot as a kid. I think what could have fixed this movie the most is if Cruella actually killed the 3 dalmatians and made a coat out of them, it's a very small yet powerful change for the character. But i guess the fact that she thought of it shows that her ''Cruella'' side is crazy enough to maybe go through with it, if not now then sometime in the future aka in 101D movie.

Oh I don’t know. Maybe, maybe not.

That's the thing, if it is, it was done poorly, and it's pretty jarring and unsatisfying when a lot of fans were really hoping for a compelling backstory for one of Disney's most evil villians.

@@lloyddragon2036 Was it? I'm not critical of movies, and i enjoyed it because I had fun watching it. I followed someone's advice and didn't watch it as a 101 Dalmatians movie. Completely separate from that universe, it was enjoyable.

Also this Jasper and Horace will leave if she order them to do it

@@thecovensystem YESSSS!!!

Read the original book we at least they're just a little bit of her backstory and her heritage.

You should check out the literature published in a villain series on Disney villains. Cruella is included and it has a backstory for her there too.

probably

'True and all but I think it would be better if they changed her story a little more because its really amazing

she did have a huge house in the animation

That is a possibility. Disney really needs to give us CANON backstories for disney villains like they did with scar in the Lion guard

@@blueotter5954 Its actually the same house at the end of Cruella we see her taking the "MAN" off Hellman Hall dubbing it Hell Hall which was the house Cruella lived in during 101 dalmatians

@@Weirdo365yea ack, this before and after mix is really shaking my head. Thanks for the clear up.

lol 😂

That is a quality comment

Thank you. :D

NO this isnt crullea de vill DEVIL this is crumma dabil not cruella they mas maketed as a origin not different character

I liked their idea of making the people spread rumors about her killing dogs for fur. It gives her reputation some dirt that she might live up to one day. Cruella even said she’s just *STARTING* , this might insinuate that she will become the spot-obsessed fashionista she is.

Cruella into the Disney Verse

Yea and I like that and I think Emma stone wanted it to be revenge hero but not villain so people would still like Emma stone that how I see it

@@shelbecovington1367 yeah they basically knew the names would sell.... Emma stone and cruella. But this is clearly a completely different/new character and concept haha.

It's an alternative universe. It doesn't even take place in the same decade as either _101 Dalmatians_ films. Anita and Roger are already adults.

@@0deadx21 it's being marketed as a prequel to the Glenn Close franchise. She is even one of the producers. Although Anita and Roger, speaking of them, yeah they're not white anymore. As they are in the cartoon and original live action movies. I guess cuz of racism? I guess in the sequel the 101 dalmatians will be played by chihuahuas. Inclusion!

She actually doesn’t kill the dog’s she doggynapps them

@@Millie.00 I know that's what I meant to say

I don't think a sequel might even make her bad especially now that the newer generation is rooting for this cruella they won't want to loose that knowing Disney. The moment we saw her bonding and caring for a dog that's when I knew this was set in another universe.

@@jeshuarestituyo284 Well, it has to, to show how Cruella became obsessed with fur, hate dogs, psychotic, insane, sadistic and desires to make a fur coat out of Dalmatian puppies.

@@DavidBContentExtravaganza3967 I agree. I actually want to Cruella to still be a villain if there is a sequel. Not that I agree of puppy killing, but it's what made Cruella the villain that she is.

true, true

I know I honestly feels bad for her

@@miyadeen2978 yeah after all, the story of villain isn't as simple as black and white. Plus they should make more of these disney villains movies

@@Thewolfartist24 I know I really want to know more of there backstory how become evil how they actually overcome there obstacles too

@@miyadeen2978 which disney villain movie do you want to see made. I what a Mother Gothel movie.

At the end of the movie Estella actually allowed the Baroness to hug her, after all of the planning & surprise appearances to make her look bad, Estella wanted her mother’s love

@@fivehundrediq5212 O come on I wanna Corella AK still an actual be cruel and evil have misunderstood

I agree

Bingcredible!

@Lahanna Singh If You Ask Me. Cruella De Vil Is Without A Doubt. One Of The Craziest And Worst Disney Villains That Everyone Just Loves To Hate! 😒

@Lahanna Singh Estella was the sympathetic and redeemable one and Estella dying so cruella can be born was symbolism that cruella is irredeemable Which people don’t get

Exactly just like the The maleficent movies they use the same characters but its telling a different story then the original and I definitely think this is true because first its not connected to the live action or animated movie in any real way (changing what Anita and Rogers Careers) and the mid credit scene definitely throws some problems if they have Pongo and Perdita become mates. Also shes already had her dalmatian coat now even though its fake but it has people think she did possible kill dalmatians making her into the 101 Dalmatian villain

Truly

Possibly

I hope not. 101 Dalmatians is the true story.

But she already had a damn good backstory. And it was from the original Source material 101 Dalmatians the original book before the Disney movie. Part of it was that she was a descendant from a serial killer who may or may not have made a deal with the Devil.

@@zachbahamutson5477 it’s called alternate interpretations We never got a backstory for the movie version tho

Agreed

@@zachbahamutson5477 but we don't know if it is canon to the disney movie

I know I literally feel bad for her

Your theory holds some weight because during the last scene where Estella & The Baroness met at the Cliff, #1 Estella Nervously asked her if you’re gonna push me over the Cliff, & #2 Estella allowed the Baroness to give her a hug meaning after all of the planning she did to take the Baroness down, Estella wanted the love of her mother & was willing to give her a second chance.

If Cruella made nearly 40 million during pandemic/lockdown, it would’ve made 200 million under normal circumstances, does that sound like a movie that sucks to you?

@@fivehundrediq5212 Fancimation Lion King made 2 billion. Still sucked.

A sequel is already planned. Could possibly explain the 101 Dalmatians story better going forward from where this film left off. There is a 25 year gap between this film and the story we all know, so that would leave plenty of time to manifest darker traits of her character.

But the difference is that they didn’t make Roger the villain, like Maleficent did to the king, where he care non for Aurora. The comparison is bunkers to me, because they make Maleficent the hero of Sleeping Beauty

@@jesussalazar1901 To me I feel like Roger being the villain wouldn't fit very well and plus it would be the same concept and would be a little bit repetitive.

@@Thewolfartist24 oh no what I am saying is Cruella didn’t do something where it throws away the original Story like Maleficent did with the King, the fairies, Philip the Prince. The Roger was just an example of what I was afraid they would do.

@@jesussalazar1901 oh ok. Well it is true they didn't give a new perspective of the original story like Maleficent.

I really hope they do a Mother Gothel movie or an Evil Queen movie.

In the case of The Joker, you follow the story of the man who inspired the one batman fights. Dont forget that it takes place decades before Bruce Wayne loses his parants. As for this.....maybe the animate movie was just a tale spun by Cruella herself to make her "Puppy Killer" reputation and it was suppose to be a false story the whole time. Damn, doing the writers' jobs for them again. Anita! Strike that from the record!

Or more like Joker (2019) it’s it own thing That film didn’t connect to the Batman of Kenton, Bale, and defiantly not Affleck, or any animated Batman movie. Cruella is it’s own thing with homages to 101 Dalmatians. In fact I don’t care if they never touch that’s story because is has been done to death.

i think they are going to make a cruella 2

Maybe we’ll see a sequel to this prequel

Wrong