Dialectical Materialism II വൈരുദ്ധ്യാത്‌മക ഭൗതീകവാദം II Prof. K.M. Francis PhD. 

After reading your comment I read Hegels logic once again. And it is purely Theological. Why Lenin commented that , it is completely materialism and nothing idealism? Both are mistaken 🙏

Don't you understand why Iam saying that I am a catholic? I don't want to cheat others, that is why I am revealing my identity. Even party secretary claim as atheist and going to temple. Moreover try to read Shorter logic of Hegel. It tries to prove that logic (logos or Christ) is the centre of history and culture and universe. Good luck man 😎

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-UZ25wCIsoWA.html

Thanks

@@franciskm4144 പക്ഷെ, താങ്കൾ ഒരു ബൈബിളെടുത്ത് വചന പ്രഘോഷണം എന്തുകൊണ്ട് നടത്തുന്നില്ല ... സത്യം മനസിലായ സ്ഥിതിക്ക്! ക്രിസ്ത്യാനികളെയെങ്കിലും രക്ഷിക്കണ്ടെ?! കഷ്ടം ... കഷ്ടം... വല്ലാത്തൊരു അനുഭവം! ഹോ !..... എങ്കിലും❤️❤️❤️

My friend it's an Aristotelean idea. Politics was written long before the book that you are referring to.

താങ്കൾ പറയുന്ന കാര്യം സാർ നിഷേധിക്കുന്നില്ല. യേശുവിനെ വ്യാഖ്യാനിച്ച ജ്ഞാനികളുടെ നിരയിൽപ്പെട്ട ഒരാളിനെ കുറിച്ചാണ് സാറ് സംസാരിച്ചത്. ഹൈഡകരും മാർക്സും ഹേഗലിനെ തെറ്റായി വ്യാഖ്യാനിച്ചു എന്ന് മാത്രമാണ് ഫ്രാൻസിസ് സാറ് പറയുന്നത്.

Quoting Hegel and Jesus funny 😁

ഏത് മാർക്സിസം ഇങ്ങനെ പറയുന്നു?

Don't worry about the intentions of the man who presented the thesis. If you can receive anything that is good.

ഇദ്ദേഹം ഹിന്ദൂയിസും , ക്രിസ്ത്യാനിറ്റിയും തമ്മിൽ സൂത്രത്തിൽ ഒരു പാലം പണിയുന്നുണ്ട്... അഭിനന്ദനാർഹം!

@@peterv.p2318 Karl Marx based his fundamental thesis on the Interpretation of original sin by Rousseau. Many Indian Marxists abandoned Marxism by understanding the bridge between Judaism and Marxism 🙏 Wait for another episode on original sin concept in Paris manuscripts 🙏

@@franciskm4144 താങ്കളെ സമ്മതിക്കുന്നു ...

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-UZ25wCIsoWA.html

Thanks 🙏

Very clear. Valuable discussion.Helps a better understanding of dialectical materialism Dr George Kaliaden

Seed നെdetermine ചെയ്യുന്ന ഘടകങ്ങളുമില്ലേ. അങ്ങനെ determine ചെയ്യുന്ന ഘടകങ്ങളെ ഒരോന്നായി മാറ്റിയാൽ പിന്നെ വിത്ത് എന്നത് എന്തായി. ഒരു Being മാത്രമല്ലേ

Hegel Dialectical Meterialism പറഞ്ഞിട്ടുണ്ടോ.Dialectics മാത്രമല്ലേ പറഞ്ഞിട്ടുള്ളു. തത്വശാസ്ത്രം വ്യാഖ്യാനിച്ചാൽ വിശപ്പ് മാറുമോ.അപ്പോൾ ആ ശാസ്ത്രത്തെ മനുഷ്യൻ്റെ ഭൗതിക സൗകര്യങ്ങൾ പ്രാപ്തമാക്കിയെടുക്കാനുള്ള തായിരിക്കേണ്ടേ. അതു മാത്രമല്ലേ മാർക്സിയൻ ദർശനം.

ഖുറാനാ... 😂😂 ലോകത്തു ഓരോ രാജ്യങ്ങളും ഉപേക്ഷിച്ചു കൊണ്ടിരിക്കുന്ന ആ tissue പേപ്പറോ 😂

Lenin says that Hegel is a materialist 🙏 Have you read Hegels Logic? Don't believe others, whoever it may be. 🙏 I personally asked Prabath patnaik about his knowledge about Hegel. He told me that he has not read Hegel.

drive.google.com/file/d/1kltUaFlex0A3RpOmKJJQGd2o6jddjksU/view?usp=sharing

@@franciskm4144 I'm not saying about what other people thought about hegel. I'm saying your point regarding Indian Marxist's take on Hegel is not true. I've attended a few classes by Marxists. Mainly from kerala. Not even a single one said hegel is useless. They have their criticisms towards hegel. But that is not just from Marxists. I'm guessing that you might be familiar with some of the criticisms anyway. And no, I haven't read Hegel. I tried reading his books but I failed. So I'm trying to understand his philosophy through commentaries on his philosophy and then going back to his original works. And what I mentioned in my comment was your take on MV Govindan's statement. Not about my trust on other people's thoughts on Hegel.

@@geojamesgeorge ok. I just used his comment as a starting point. Marxists are really confused. I appreciate their sincerity. The books of Karl Marx also are very difficult to understand. Since I was teaching economics and philosophy for last forty years I slowly entered into the meaning of different texts. I appreciate your attempt to read Hegel.Read it again and again. If you need I will give you all my help in that attempt 🙏

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-UZ25wCIsoWA.html

Yes . This theory is applicable in all social fields. Hegel use the word sublation for assimilating the good in the earlier stage. For example in one stage of history property was social. If there is only social property individuals in the society will be the slaves of custodians of social prperty. As an antithesis private property system evolved. But now both private and public property exists together. If Govt fails to keep the balance society moves either towards the fascism of the private ownership or the slavery of those in power.

Raviyannan's boy spotted.

100%

ര വി ചന്ദ്രന്റെ മെഗാ ഫോൺ ആകാതെ കാര്യങ്ങൾ പഠിച്ചു പറയുക.

Hegel is influenced by Sankar's philosophy

I am a Critique of Marxism. However Marx gave an aim to people. That aim is powerful. But now communists fogot the aim itself. Party exists because many people sincere and committed to the good of the people are still with party.

I couldn't understand how to communist party is mislead the aim... Please explain

@@deerajkv6858 Originally the definition of communism include three parts 1) freedom of individual 2) harmony or cohesion in society 3) possibility of developing the potential of individuals. This is really the aim of a communist. Then What is means To achieve the aim abolition of private property. Later communist parties defined communism as abolition of private property. That is why I said communist parties forgotten their aim. You just search in google only one definition quoted from manifesto ie communism in one word means abolition of private property. Then you ask where from you got the aim of communism is as stated above? Actually it is from Hegel's philosophy of right par 260. And was taken by and used by Engels in framing communist act of faith 🙏

തമിഴ് നാട്ടുകാർ പൊതുവെ സൈലന്റ് r ശബ്ദിക്കും നോർത്ത് ഇന്ത്യൻസും ചില ആളുകൾ അങ്ങനെ ഉപയോഗിക്കുന്നത് കാണാം.. ഉദാഹരണം ടെണിങ്.. ടർണിങ് കോണർ.. കോർണർ.. Carl.. കാറൽ, കാൾ എന്നൊക്കെ

We malayalis are reading malayalam newspaper. And we pronounce English words written in newspapers. So to get correct pronunciation we should not read malayalam newspaper.

😬😬😬

ദാസ് കാപ്പിറ്റല്‍ എഴുതിയവൻ.. അത്രയും മതി..

@@georgetharayil1731 അത്രയും പോരെങ്കിലോ 🤔🤔🤔🤔

Science has grown so much ok . what about social science? How can we find difference between animal and Man. Animal kingdom exists by the principle fittest survive. In that rape is truth. On what basis one can convince man that rape is antisocial. How can we explain freedom. Hów can we explain rights of women. In terms of science there is no convincing reason for that. Social Darwinism is really existing. Religions role is against social Darwinism.Why not in India even now political parties and leadership behaving as kings? To these questions Hegel gives answers. He predicted Hidu fanaticism in 1805. German economic system is based on Hegelian principles. We cannot contribute to theoretical phYsics without using mathematics which is based on logic alone. Electricity is mathematics. How can You realise that. Don't underestimate German idealism. Especially humanism derived from it. Science students never understand humanism.🙏

@@franciskm4144 There is only one factor that sets a human apart from other living things ... that is what is the Brain volume of 1300CC..... Then you may ask one question "Elephant is an animal with a bigger brain than a human have, and why it does not think equal or over a human brain do. There is only one answer. Humans are the only organism that takes one-fifth of the total energy consumed from food. In other words brain to body weight ratio. It is the part of evolution that human gained. U may be knowing that brain has several lobs. Actually speaking 4 lobs and a brain stem or reptilian brain. In human the frontal lob volume is much much higher than others. That is what providing thinking power to human. There are eighty billion of neurons in this frontal lobe help to store massive data as electrical impulse and get stimulated by the hormones called dopamine, serotonin, oxytocin and endorphins. These are just biochemical substances. "Material" objects in your language. In the rest of the organisms the frontal lobe is less developed. The reptilian lobe is the only active one or only part those have. The energy it consumes is less than few percentage. Humans also have this reptilian brain. It controls the body's vital functions such as heart rate, breathing, body temperature and balance. Basically mind or consciousness is something that continuously compares with present input from the environment with the the large stored data mainly in frontal lob as like flip-flops(basis memory cell) chip that doing in electronics. You may also knows about artificial intelligence. So there is no necessity of brain for thinking and processing. A basic example is already in ur hand. That is what is ur smartphone.U know why a child doesn't have a larger thinking capacity than an adult? Answer is simple. The stored data and the volume capacity is less than that of an adult brain. According to Antonio Damasio a great neuroscientist "humans are not thinking or feeling machines. But rather feeling machine that think " and are purely have only materialistic property. There is no dialectics involved. Next social Darwinism and religion. I have well explanation, but bit lazy to write.So I would like ask u a simple question. You know there are lot of countries those don't following any religion. Especially Scandinavians. They are more advanced in science and humanitarian principle and gender equality far far above than religious nations like india and such others. U can also check the facts in web that I have put forwarded. Now u tell me why religion is not impacting there, to make those people as antisocial and the elements of social Darwinism? So its just a social myth that imposed on primitive brain by religion to sustain and to establish religious dominance. Because our brain has evolved as to intake such cognitive biases as part of evolution. I believe u got my point. Right? Culture is not a pre defined one but it is a continuously refined collection of data acquired from his environment. In 2011, Hawking declared that "philosophy is dead". Every one know Hawkins is a great scientists. But science will not bother who said or whose statement is. Science has its own methodology to verify a hypothesis or a statement. Hawkins had well understand on those and he had submitted his statement along with substantial scientific evidence to prove his claims. It will be available in web if u interested u can go through.... Next is the electricity and mathematical relation. Being a 15 years experienced R&D engineer in power electronics, I am much interested in that domain. There are lot of mathematics equations and derivations connected with electricity. It would be good enough, to be more specific, what maths u r refering on electricity in this contest. If u have an additional information on that beyond my knowledge.. It will a good opportunity to me for grabbing those things.👍 മതങ്ങളോ തത്വചിന്തകളോ തെറ്റായിരുന്നു എന്ന് എനിക്ക് അഭിപ്രായം ഇല്ല. മറിച്ചു അതിന്റെ പ്രാരംമ്പദശയിൽ അത് അന്നത്തെ സംസ്കാരത്തിന്റെയും മാനവികതയുടെയും വളർച്ചയിൽ വലിയൊരു പങ്കു വഹിച്ചുട്ടുണ്ട് എന്ന അഭിപ്രായം ഉണ്ട്താനും. ആ കാലത്ത് അവയ്ക് പ്രസക്തി ഉണ്ടയിരുന്നു. പിന്നീട് മതങ്ങൾ സ്വയം പരിഷ്കാരിക്കപ്പെടാതിരിക്കുകയും തത്വചിന്ത സയൻസിലേക്ക് വളർച്ച പ്രാപിക്കുകയും പിന്നീട് അനുദിനം അത് more precise ആയികൊണ്ടിരിക്കുകയും ചെയ്തു. പക്ഷേ സയൻസിന്റെ വളർച്ച മനുഷ്യന്റെ സംസ്കാരത്തെ ഒരുപാട് മുന്നോട്ട് കൊണ്ടുപോയി... രോഗനിർണ്ണയ ഉപകരണങ്ങൾ പുതിയ പുതിയ കണ്ടുപിടുത്തങ്ങൾ, പുതിയ സാങ്കേതിക വിദ്യകൾ.....അങ്ങനെ.. അങ്ങനെ ഒരുപാട് മേഖലകളിൽ നമ്മുടെ സംസ്കാരത്തിൽ സ്വാധീനം ചെലുത്തി.... പക്ഷെ അന്നത്തെ മത പുസ്തകങ്ങളിലോ താത്വചിന്താ പുസ്തകങ്ങളിലോ പറയുന്നതാണ് ഇന്നും ശരി എന്നത് ഒരാൾ തർക്കിച്ചുകിണ്ടിരിക്കുന്നത് അല്ലെങ്കിൽ വരുത്തി തീർക്കാൻ ശ്രമിക്കുന്നത് തന്റെ കയ്യിലിരിക്കുന്ന Nokia 1100 ആണ് ഇന്നത്തെ ഏത് സ്മാർട്ട്‌ ഫോണിനേക്കാൾ features ഉള്ളത് എന്ന് ബാലിശമായി ഒരാൾ ശഠിക്കുന്നതിന് അത്രയും പരിഹാസ്യമാണ്. അല്ലെങ്കിൽ മനുഷ്യ സംസ്‍കാരത്തിന്റെ വളർച്ചയ്ക്ക് സാർ പറയുമ്പോലെ ഇപ്പോഴും സംഭവനകൾ ഫിലോസഫി നൽകുന്നുണ്ടെങ്കിൽ എന്തുകൊണ്ട് ഫിലോസഫിയ്ക് ഇവിടെ നോബൽ പ്രൈസ് കൊടുക്കാത്തത് എന്ത് എന്ന് സാർ ഒന്ന് ഇനിയെങ്കിലും ഇരുത്തി ചിന്തിക്കേണ്ടിയിരിക്കുന്നു. കലഹരണപ്പെട്ട തത്വശാസ്ത്രങ്ങളെ തലയിലേറ്റി നടക്കുന്നത്, അങ്ങയുടെ കുഴപ്പമല്ല. പരിണാമപരമായി മനുഷ്യമനസിൽ വന്നിട്ടുള്ള ഒന്നാണ് സാമ്പുഷ്ടമായ ഭൂതകാലത്തെ കുറിച്ചുള്ള സ്മരണ. മോർഡേൺ സൈക്കോളജിയിൽ മനുഷ്യ മനസിന്റെ ആർക്കിയോ ടൈപ്പുകൾ അടയാളപ്പെടുത്തിയതിൽ ഒന്നിതാണ്. ✌️

@@lijeeshmk8275 Good 🙏 In the above analysis one statement is ver relevant. Religious leaders are not allowing to reform themselves according to the finding of Science. I accept that statement. Really Immanuel Kants contribution is termed as copenicken revolution in philosophy. Before him philosophy was hand made religion. He said religion should be purified by religion. I said that religions role is in contributing to human relationships . But unfortunately leaders of religions don't know such thing. You just compare the epic Ramayana and I Iliad and odesseus the basic story is same . The duty of King is protecting the woman from stealing from his husband. In the first evolutionary stage of human history this has highly relevant. Because at that stage stealing was the order of the day. But the persons who follow religion donot know such things. In science itself there are many stages Thomas Khun wrote a book structure of scientific revolution. That book used the method of Hegel to narrate the history of science. Never think that earlier stages are useless. Instead on earlier stages present is built. Even now in European universities discuss Plato and Aristotle. Regarding my statement that electricity is mathematics, that is a statement from my brother,who is retired from Karnataka electricity board as chief engineer. I don't know much detail. But one thing I understood from dicussions ,infinite integrals of a function are the basis of sending messages from a cellphone. Otherwise messages from one will conflict with other.If you ask how the signals are controlled and give unique signal by applying integrals, I don't know. I am economics teacher. If I know this minute detail I am in Apple company🙏 This basic step, translating integrals into signals by using some material is the real thing. That is link between mathematics and electronics. I am not good in science . Iam good in economics.

@@franciskm4144 If religion takes and reforms the ideas of science, it must first reject creation theory in religion. Next it will challenge the possibility of God's Existence. And later it will reject all the fairy tail stories told in religion. If so, then religion will have reject religion itself. Finally existence of religion itself will disappear. That is why religion has always denied science by its priesthood and by its own internal structure. Coming back to electronics I haven't understand what infinite integral u r taking on cellular communication May be due to my limited understanding in electronics. As per my knowledge cellular technology normally using the techniques Frequency division multiple access (FDMA), Time division multiple access (TDMA) and Code division multiple access (CDMA). All are supporting full duplex communication( bidirectional ) it is design to work without conflicts. Then I am not able to understand what infinite integral u r talking about. Could u please more specific?

@@lijeeshmk8275 My knowledge more limited than you. How does frequency is divided in actually? Search this question continuously to the extent that you can develop something by which you can divide the frequency by your own. Then you will understand. This method of acquiring knowledge is Praxis, a term designed by philosophers. If F=1, integral is f=x+c then what is the value of f , we can attribute c= a range varying from _ infinity to + infinity. Thus you get infinite number of answers. This is to be translated into technology. Those persons who are claiming that they follow science actually did not contribute anything to society. They are living by selling science. What is the contribution of sastra sahitya Parishad to science? Have they contributed anything to science? Are there any scientists in Kerala? Would Kerala give opportunity to any scientist to grow? Do you know kochu ouseph chittillapilly has a valid patent? Would you consider him as scientist? Without having any contribution many are upholding science as a mask to prove that they themselves are scientist? But you get an opportunity to experiment and invent in America or in Europe where a large amount of people are honouring philosophy. You just open the English channels in you tube where professors are delivering lectures about Kant Plato etc. Why did people kill philosophers? They were the real champions who subotaged ancient autocratic kingdoms. Where you are working peacefully. Socrates crushed ancient methods. Philosophers are continuing that. If philosophers are useless as Hawking says then why are they killed? Beware again autocrats will come 🙏

Not available

Sir, it's not 34 but 38

@@TruthWillSF yes

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-UZ25wCIsoWA.html

Every reality in this universe is growing by negating + assimilating+ growing. This process is continuing. This is how our intelligence grows society grows, plant grows, science grows, economy grows. Thanks 🙏

ചുരുക്കി പറഞ്ഞാൽ ഇതു വെറും ഒരു ഇതാണ്.

Practice of communist 🎉

Dear friend, hegels entire project is to proove Christ brings freedom. Never use your metanarative as basic norm to judge my delivery. Instead read hegels shorter logic and check whether I have done justice to Hegel 🎉 Thanks for your comments 🙏

Why Lenin said 'I have seen no idealism in Hegels logic'? . May be you are great reader than Lenin. 😁

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-UZ25wCIsoWA.html

@@franciskm4144 if you are saying that Hegels project is to prove christ being freedom, then surely it is idelaism. So you are contradcting yourself.

@@franciskm4144 Lenin never say that Hegel is not an idealsit. Then how he can be a Marxist and Materialsit. Lenin’s aim in ‘reading Hegel materialistically’ was to sift out the rational kernel of this Logic from the idealism in which it was constricted, for Hegel believed that only the ‘Absolute Idea’ had reality, expressing its necessary development in nature and history1. Lenin’s reading of Hegel was an attempt to develop a notion of dialectic which is not grounded in human subjectivity2. While Hegel was an idealist, Marx was a materialist, and Lenin believed that Hegel’s dialectic needed merely to be "inverted"2. So, Lenin did not say that Hegel is not an idealist. In fact, he acknowledged Hegel’s idealism and sought to read his works from a materialistic perspective.

Yes. Hegel says that Spirit is working in history. Actually human consciousness is growing through the route map explained by Hegel. This is also the route map of growth of Science 🎉

Can a circle be 359 degrees?

@@franciskm4144 ഒരു രൂപ 99 പൈസയാകുമോ?

@@peterv.p2318 There are some things which are absolute another things which are relative. We teach in economics that price is relative.To understand this high I Q is necessary.

@@franciskm4144 അതുതന്നെയാണ് ആദ്യം പറഞ്ഞത്!

@@peterv.p2318 ok

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-UZ25wCIsoWA.html

I accept that. Marx says abut ossification. Many Dogmas of the Catholic Church are earlier principles ossified. The term is taken from Marx. European society critically examine their theories continuously. They examined their myths and used it for analysing human behaviour. For example oedipus Complex and Electra complex.. Indians are not doing that. You just observe the structure of catholiç church in Kerala it is same as CPM. Both are not ready to go transform. I am a devout catholic. At the same time a critique of its dogma, practice and structure. My methodology is evolutionary and not revolutionary.

വിവരക്കേട് ആണെങ്കിൽ വിവരം എന്താണെന്ന് താങ്കൾ ദയവായി ഒരു വീഡിയോ ചെയ്യൂ. അപേക്ഷ ആണ്. ഞങ്ങളെ പോലെയുള്ള സാധാരണക്കാർക്ക് മനസ്സിലാക്കാമല്ലോ