Everything Wrong With Ant-Man and the Wasp 

The entire mcu isnt 100 hours tho homie

Justus Voss it would be with Luis

No podcast. An entire movie of just Luis explaining everything to none marvel fans so people get even more emotional when they start killing off characters

I want a scene where Luis meets Ned and drax

Justus Voss you clearly know nothing about luis’ storytelling

Yadda Yadda

prajwal prakash probably cop-out with psuedo-science: They are smaller than oxygen molecules, meaning they are receiving more oxygen at their size than the oxygen in real-time.

Because this universe has aliens, gods, giant green monster men, sentient robots, nazi-ghosts, and wizards. But the oxygen is the thing you can't suspend your disbelief for?

@@ayjay579 yes, coz this one involves a human surviving there and breathing is one of our basics to survive. I'm letting all the other inconsistencies related to quantum realm slide

@@prajwalprakash003 and we let that one slide. Willing suspension of disbelief is different for everyone

I'm pretty sure he said something like magic nano machines that do everything don't count.

HotaruZoku he specifically said SHEILD tech.

@@tovahnvitols7614 ......are you high? The TEXT CRAWL isn't a full 60 seconds in says otherwise.

it just sounds like he's an sjw

@@odd-jobsmatt7965 Sometimes, I wonder Thanks for the help anti-gas lighting me.

Yea but if you quantum quantum'd a quantum quantum just about quantum, you'd be quantum.

I was also thinking of a bonus round every time someone said "The lab"

Why say quantum all the fucken time

@@alexreilly6121 Godzilla had a stroke reading this and fucking died

Duuuude! You gotta warn a person before you go blowing their minds like that!

Didn't know about such product. If it was a thing when this movie was in works, that's one hell of a missed opportunity.

@@selforganisation Duracell Quantum is one of those "deluxe" high capacity batteries and has been around since the early 2000's.

@@DargonhumanI guess they didn't sell these or at least advertise them in Europe.

Jordan Herkowski Plus the Duracell powering the place totally breaks the law of conservation of energy

erosion271 Not if you have a daughter you love and miss dearly who you know you may be separated from for years when you get caught, because I doubt Scott would have really expected to escape and not have his secret identity revealed. Then again, movie logic

James Dai Again it’s captain America, the man who lead the team that saved the world from an alien invasion. Scott probably thinks he’s doing the right thing helping cap

Hail Hydra

Facts💪

@Ethan Baker Steve Rogers was very selfish in Cap America Civil War tho...

💯 like

Chris Allie uhhh isn’t she like 16

Chris Allie actually no she is 15 bruh u finna catch a case

John Hoquist she’s 18 u idiot

John Hoquist and speak English

Lord Pyralis he and his coworkers are the worst thing in this movie, and probably in the whole mcu

Leonardo 1 *best

he took off a sin for him

@@jeffwei Wait, how are you verified with 16 subscribers?

You didn’t finish the video, did you?

Thanos accounted for that. Like how TV shows air later in California than they do in New York.

+SilentBudgie That Time Stone really is one hell of a magic gem.

Fuujinryu that’s just too nerdy 😂 I never even thought about the fact that the whole movie took place in daytime.

Flammable YT That’s not nerdy, that’s just thinking logically.

Unless the snap isn't instantaneous everywhere but spreads out like a wave from Wakanda into the rest of the world/universe.

Decreasing the space between atoms: how to blow up things. The 'science' in this movie is 'stupid science'.

@@emsnewssupkis6453 i know the science doesnt make sence but it was the fact that they said it like it should that annoys me

All of the movie is 'magic' and not any attempt at 'science'. The childish nature of modern movies is astonishing.

Who cares the story and the comedy was shit

@@emsnewssupkis6453 "The childish nature of modern movies is astonishing" how old are you, 14?

Woozy.y it’s not exact. That was just his experience. Yea it’s inconsistent but that the entire reason they were able to do what they did in Endgame. Think about it, every 5 hours they spent fixing everything would have been 5 years in the OG timeline, but instead it was the other way around...they spent as much time as needed in the past but in the present only a few minutes had gone by. So no that doesn’t really apply to Janet’s age...but you are right...it doesn’t make since. But hey there are fucking wizards in this universe, what can you do.

The 5 year/5 hour thing wasn't just from being in the quantum realm. There was a throw-away line in the Ant-Man 2 end-credit scene about the risk of getting stuck in a time-vortex. Scott just happened to slip into one and survive, and that's what gave the Avengers the idea to try and control that possibility. Janet didn't travel in time.

To be fair to Jeremy, no-one knew that yet. Also Michelle Pfeiffer still aged in the quantum realm, which is brought up in the EWW Endgame video.

They just say time works differently in the quantum realm. There is no 5 years = 5 hours rule, that was just random.

They said that time works differently, not that years seem like hours. Scott got caught in the time vortexes Janet mentioned, and it sent him five years into the future. Janet did no such thing, as she obviously knew to avoid the vortexes due to spending three full decades down there. Scott traveled to the future the same way the Avengers traveled to the past.

Old comment but I just had a thought: Perhaps Pym built the building and its contents on the small scale then blew it up.

@@TheDarkFable Nice idea, but then wouldnt the building blow away when it is big?

@@Elleaf1 Some sort of anchoring perhaps?

There’s not one lick of consistency with the magic tech in these films. Just assume Hank figured out a way to change the shrinking method so that you can pick and choose which mode you want...

It's totally plot dependent. The same scene will have a shrunken character cracking the floor and then being light as a feather as needed.

It’d take too long

Missed opportunity to make something resembling a good video

@@ShakingHandsMedia missed opportunity to simply not watch the video.

@@ShakingHandsMedia If you mean the creators of Ant Man And The Wasp, then I agree.

I think that's dumb, just enjoy the movie... But if it was a real obvious sin, then yeah it's good to point it out. It's called constructive criticism...

Same.. its fkn annoying cant enjoy a movie anymore

I have that too, every time I hear " come look at this", cliche it goes ding in my head.

I never watched movies like that... But now that I've read your comment things won't be same ever again

I've been doing it for ages. I keep it all to myself if we're watching something new, but it turns into a pretty fun group game with Company if you're re-watching something everyone has seen. I have legitimately thought about getting a ding sound effect for my phone.

YES!

U are sooooo right

And, so I asked, did Scott W ask Joshua West to ask jazzy jazzy to ask me, because he thinks I know Michael Pena in real life? And he said.....Yes!

That's about right.⬆

I would watch Luis narrate all the MCU movies starting with Iron Man.

Exactly, it's common sense.

Because if they do they'll have to use the money for their shark repellant budget

Mr X you gon give it to em?

Good idea dude, it's cheap, easy to get & definitely effective.

@@Carlisho With the non-stop pop pop and stainless steel.

u wot mate

@@felemiah Every person has a 50 percent chance... If you have 3 people, multiply .5 by .5 by .5, which equals .125 or 12.5%...

@@felemiah Unless of course you are a guardian, then you were pretty much dead...

@@mschuhler I question your math skills...

Every person doesn’t have a 50% chance, because this way more then half of humanity could be wiped out if alot of people are just unlucky, that way, if they are REALLY unlucky, the whole of humanity could be snapped away, so you have to look at it as a percentage of the entire human race, not just individually, just like sheckii told you but you told him every person has a 50% chance which isnt true

Their mass stays the same, their density increases so weight is the same? More?

@@asgardninja9674 An increasing density would mean the lab-building should be sinking into the earth like a bullet. If its mass stays the same, and so does Earth's gravity, it should still weigh as much as a full building. Either way, Hank's technology is bull :)

@@LucianCanad Yet he found a way to make the mass seperate from each other while in a small object .

Their mass is supposed to stay the same yet Ant-Man sits on ants without destroying them.

@@LucianCanad no one thought about the basic laws of conservation of mass when they came out with this retarded idea. which is a shame because they kept putting the word quantum next to everything.

The movie shouldn't have that but, Marvel should upload something like that one their channel.

Yep that would be awesome

I never knew I needed this but now I know that I will never anything more.

all part of the plan brother

Oooohhh!!! Extra creepy sauce!!!!

technicly its also mean in a ways that hank fucked his son in law ( god please tell me they mary in the mcu or ant man 3

Henry that would require a lot more mass in a much smaller amount of space(and several other factors)

You thought of what I know

U are a black hole 🕳

Shhhhhh

@@chrisallie2224 Black holes are Tight!

They're still sin-able

@@TheExecutioner21 no

XOVO lmao it’s a joke guys calm itn

is the supposed to be non-ironic

I think Jeremy will even go to remove a sin for Stan's cameo in Spider-Verse. "It always fits... eventually." And that cameo is an awesome one.

And it was bugging me that they didn't angle it down towards the cars, how annoying would it be to have your theater screen tilted up like that??

I don't usually watch videos in fullscreen because it gives me headaches for some reason. It's part of the reason I don't go to cinemas.

ElFlechero It’s “bugging” you, huh?

The lost and found at my elementary school was in the principals office.

Mine was just a dusty, spider-infested, cob web covered rack outside in the hallway with some clothes and lunch pails containing 2 year old sandwiches lol

@@awebtoonreader4979 well that's gross lol

Heck, I spent 5 years in the US and the school I went to just had a bookcase in the lunch room stocked with things people left behind, that's actually how I got this phone, and a new bag cuz my old one tore open one day.

About a year ahead of their time.

@Lythrana Duskryn he aint as awesome a story teller as Luis. That's why he's jealous

Yeah nobody Badmouths Luis’ story recaps!

Exactly DO NOT DISRESPECT LUIS' STORYTELLING SKILLS

Wait for cinema wins. They typically note the good and bad of different scenes

I love his way of explaining shit because it's like a story

The battery just supports my theory that the building actually started out as a small toy model, where the battery charged the electricity, and is merely enlarged when needed, maybe because the mass of the Quantum tunnel thingy makes it unusable when small.

Same 😂

Rude One facts

MegaSoulHero 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

You’d be excellent at CinemaSins 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Or “West Coast Avengers.”

Sjw

I love Paul Rudd, but holy shit was that scene bad and … odd.

both of those were so cringe

Saul Goodman It definitely was cringy and had me feeling very weird, but you have to admit his acting was on point there.

And the scene with his daughter.

Hay, evolution is plausible. Haven't you ever seen the X-Me.................ooooohhhhh.

@@samueltheprideofafrikarobi9319 I think Samosa Nathan was getting at the point that evolution is the result of a series of adaptations of a species to new environmental conditions - members with successful adaptations pass them onto future generations while members with failed adaptations are killed off before they can mate.

Dargonhuman yup. "Adaptation is part of it, but some of it is... adaptation" hmm

"Adaptation" is not the same as "evolution". "Adaptation" ususally is for a short term and not genetically involved, whereas "evolution" is in long term and has to be a change that can be passed on to the descendants, therefore genetics is involved.

@@locochoify Evolution, however, is a form of adaptation (of species, to environmental stress), thus the sentence still sounds kind of redundant. Now if she said that it's adaptation, and then expanded on this thought by saying it's a continuous adaptation resembling evolution, then it would make more sense. Also, a single organism is not subject to evolution, a collection called a species is.

I was gonna say your mother., 😏

r/PunPatrol! You're under arrest!

Bug you

Your joke was bad, & you should feel bad for saying it

Kentrc11 woooosh

Omg yes! Archer is amazing! Enough said. XD

uh phasing

That joke is already in this video.

Statalyzer Yeah.... I was........ quoting my favourite part.

Most of these aint errors they are bull shit jokes

He literally once said there was no gravity in space and “space air”

@@wiwkekskkekssjjssjsj8646 in open space, there is so little gravity that comparing it to no gravity would result in 0 differences. It's so similar to no gravity that it basically is 0 G. So hes not incorrect. And there is air in space. Clouds of hydrogen and oxygen are all over. It's not breathable though.

Have u got nits

Hey, hats off to you for not seeing race!

Identity theft is not a joke, Jim!

I understood that reference

Liam Gordon “You’re Not Jim!”

@@Theo-ju4op and I understood that one

applez are criminals

MyName is Jeff yea it’s like they are just quoting a joke anthology...wait

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-iB7C7o920zE.html

MyName is Jeff lol nope we criticize it for more than bug puns. Also ppl like me like the move just as much as the sins lol

rewester17 dude...your videos are shit..11 million subs yet you still come here trying to promote basically you be itching about things as well...one day someone will be the new you making a video about you as well and digging into your life and how you operate...Jesus...11million subs and you still can’t quit wanting attention huh? Lol welp...this is the end of my attention for ya. Good luck and quit hating or that shit will come back around

yea it's really BUGGIN me

Also zero visible piles of feces on the streets.

Really? Why san franc is so bad? Bhutan has no homeless ppl, they get houses for free.

Damn i didn’t know this was a documentary about SF

Bcoz plot convinience

Well, he HAS done that in the comics before.

🧜‍♀️🧜‍♀️ *WAN9T ME? LO8OK, I MASTB*ATE NAK1ED,снеск2 снann5el* 🔞

The beginning of the end for MCU. They went full feminist on this

Imagine it being just before but keep in the post credit scene of hope, hank and janet being dusted.....that would have been a great way to introduce infinity war

@@JCash493 How?? They'd just be spoiling the ending of their biggest and (arguably) best film by showing the snap in action.

I liked it more then infinity war...it had more heart and characters i actually liked...

GoodGuyWooper Instead of Hank, Hope and Janet getting dusted, it should be Scott with his family watching T.V then an emergency alert warns them about the attack in New York and Ebony Maw’s spaceship, that to me would be a much better post/after credits scene. Then in Infinity War, the post credits scene should be Hank, Hope and Janet getting dusted. When Scott sees the emergency, he decides he can’t go to New York because last time he helped The Avengers unannounced he got arrested, so he wants to keep his family safe by staying with them instead of leaving and repeating the same mistakes.

​@@davidneiman7393 We all knew that at the end once the trailer came out

Tate Freeman what? It would just shrink everyone inside

@@wiwkekskkekssjjssjsj8646 I said potentially, as the buildings and cars they shrink throughout the movie all have special devices built in, but this one doesn't so we don't know what would happen.

Tate Freeman and if we don’t know that doesn’t mean it’s a sin

And in the movie answers your dumb sin yes they survive

Such a movie troop

Get to tailgating while driving fast!

THANK YOU.

Then why does he give them verbal instructions?

@@atomicmrpelly Alright, you have a point there I admit.

@@atomicmrpelly He's thinking out loud. Brilliant people are known to talk to themselves - hell, dumb people do it, too.

How? How does he "mindcontrol" animals, when all his technology is about quantum physics?? It's bullshit in the comics and it's never explicitely mentioned in the Ant Man movies because it's bullshit. The comic book writers who invented the character apparently went "His theme is 'ants', right? So, when he gets small he gets super-strong, like an ant, right, and he can, like, talk to ants, because reasons."

i actually like this movie better than the first. The thanos part yeah but everything else was well done

Because the movie is forgettable ,it has no substance and like every other MCU film it's a comedy show.

It's the weakest super hero movie of last year. Doesn't mean it's bad or anything, but it's definately not memorable imo.

It's not a bad movie. It's not amazing, either. It's just very awkwardly placed in the mcu, due to it's pretty low stakes and being quite detatched from the overall mcu, after we've reached the high stakes of Infinity War into Engame. That said, I did like the ending scene with him stuck in the quantum realm, after the Thanos snap. That was a nice touch that took advantage of its awkward place in the mcu.

@@Five050 very well said, and thats what annoys me about it, Ant-Man and the Wasp had the potential to be so out there and a really unique sequel, and while it was an enjoyable couple of hours, it never reached its full potential, further proving the first one was even beginning to be memorable because of Edgar Wrights work on it

Yeah, I was wondering about whether the mass condensation of going subatomic would be enough to create a black hole. I sense it wouldn't but would still be a fun problem to solve.

Vah0n1 Manuel-Scott Yes and No. They aren’t the same, A smaller version wouldn’t weigh the same as the building Mass and Weight are two different things Mass deals with the amount of matter and weight deals with the force of gravity on that object

@@drew9384 Which means that the building being shrunk to that scale would weigh exponentially more than the unshrunk building and punch a suitcase-sized hole through the ground. They said in the first movie that the mass of the object stays the same, just the space between the atoms is reduced, so compressing that much mass down to that small of an object would make it weigh thousands of times more. Hell, the mere speed of shrinking that much mass so quickly would have caused enough suction as the air rushed to fill that massive volume of suddenly-empty space to cause hurricane-force winds that would have knocked Scott and Hank on their faces and possibly even flipped the car on top of them, to say nothing of the sudden depressurization blowing out all of the windows of the nearby buildings.

Why are you all still using this logic when we saw a tank keychain last movie? It's obvious that Pym Particles don't keep the same mass since Scott is able to ride a fucking ant. Everybody keeps using the one line from last movie and not their own eyes.

Dargonhuman it’s not that it would weigh more, since both the mass and the force of gravity would remain unchanged, which are the two components in determining weight. However, the building WOULD punch a hole thru many, many layers of earth because the same mass would be focused over a smaller surface area.

TV gets boring eventually and Porn kills 5-15 minutes usually.

Both get boring after a while , and realistically you can only jerk off every hour or more before that gets boring as well, yea males, we are weird, yay

Apparently it does her make up too

Furious Sherman yes, because that helmet would save her if she flew off the damn thing

@@sensitive_salamander1091 They weren't going very fast, and it definitely wouldn't end up as bad as if she didn't have it on.

XD for some reason I read this in Scott’s voice

@@sensitive_salamander1091 a bicycle goes faster than that

Nope. Stop pointing out flaws in his male feminist rant. Also, the Korean scientist that helped Ultron make the Vision...

He’s talking about as a lead character. Everyone he listed has their own movie

Julie Newmar invented pantyhose...

Y'all, thats the fucking joke

@@Paulafan5 and then later in the video he complains about Wasp kicking ass, like dude weren't you the one complaining in the beginning of the video of not letting female superhero take the spotlight and now your role is reversed.

At least the only thing they're trying to sell is a movie and now, like, a quantum panacea.

Also they say Ghost gets in a state where she can't interact with matter, yet she clearly and conveniently always interact with the ground. That's a big issue, I'm surprised this one and yours weren't included in the video.

Jason Jones it was also set up in the first movie that hank can carry a tank as a key chain.

Simple, Hank is just really, really strong.

That's not what the first movie says, and obviously not what it does from looking at anything that happens in either movie. Hank carried a TANK on his keychain in that movie, obviously objects do not keep their mass. And the building??? The movie actually said objects maintain their "density," so you have to watch when tiny that you don't stab people with your fist. Also you're not going to get an actual explanation of what the Pym Particles do or how they work because Pym is so protective of the technology(also because it's utterly insane.)

@@trezapoioiuy ghost quantum tunnels through matter. that means she can phase through things like thin walls, but the floor is thick so she can't fall down. it also looked like she can control it to some extent.

45 mph is 45 mph. Rpm might be different, and car lengths traveled might be different, but 45 mph is 45 mph (Also, if a 10 foot car covers 1 mile, that is 528 car lengths, not 520)

Dogerus, ,...just go see how RC cars and planes scale their speeds.

@@christophermitchell7001 so are you saying if two objects are moving at the same speed, the larger one moves faster? Because that's what it seems like you're saying

@@incendiary6243 A car can rotate its wheels at a given RPM. That would be the same at both sizes. Lets say that the RPM of the car's wheels is 5. It rotates 5 times per minute. It would be significantly more than that, but this is my example. The distance the car can travel per rotation is important here. For a large car with a wheel of circumference of 1 metre, it can travel 5 metres in that minute. The shrunk car's wheel has a circumference significantly smaller, lets say, 1 cm. Therefore, the smaller car travels at 5cm per minute. Significantly slower. The factor that changes is size, and the only size that significantly effects a car's speed is the circumference of the tyre.

@@russellbloxwich693 rpm is irrelevant in speed. If 2 objects are traveling at the same translational velocity, they will reach the exact same distance in the exact same time. The smaller wheels will have a higher rotational velocity, but thats not relevant here

why is your profile pic ubiquitious in youtube

Q U A N T I U M

Bonus round: uses of the word Quantum in this movie! **DING**

If it worked well, maybe. What was shown here was not even uncanny valley material - it was more "bad '90s animation" level bad... :/

@@entropyzero5588 oh c'mon.. it was nowhere near that bad. You're worse than Cinema sins 😜

Yeah, honestly, I didn't even notice it watching the movie (and didn't find it uncanny even when it was being pointed out here). Maybe I just don't read enough tabloids that I have a perfect mental image of what Pfeiffer should look like.

Agreed. I'm blown away how flawless it looks.

I think it looks shit.

Maybe she flew into a small hole?

Let’s not forget they were first on top of a intermediate range missile, that used rockets instead of air-breathing engines. So, they would be fighting winds in the 600-1800mph range. (10x that if it was a ICBM, with a terminal velocity near Mach 25, not Mach 1-3) If she really popped up and had the belt suddenly take all her weight, she would have easily been ripped in half. Not to mention you arms and legs being folded behind you.

They're kind of inconsistent about it but shrinking objects are supposed to retain their original mass. So at subatomic levels Janet would have the same powerful punch as a full sized human. At that size that amount of power to an atom could easily lead to the entire structure destabailizing.

@@BadWolf739 Except she wouldn't be able to see because photons would be larger than her head and not able to enter her eye without killing her instantly. Also, the Schwarzfield radius would apply if she retained the same mass and she'd be inside her own personal miniature black hole with no way of seeing anything at all, ever.

@@stylis666 Yes and Ironman's reactor shouldn't work and there's no serum that would give you superstrength while also turning your head into a red skull. This is comic book logic we are talking about. From a scientific perspective shrinking works one of two ways neither of which would be viable as both would kill a human. I do wish Antman had made a little more effort to establish a zone of "this works this way, it's ridiculous but accept it like this and everything else falls into place" instead of what they did which was have shrinking tech act however was convenient in whatever way they needed but if you're going to start targeting the realism of comic book movies you're going to very quickly realise that they aren't realistic in the slightest. It just comes down to what level of suspension of disbelief they can narratively justify before they lose the viewer.

And dead in a week, all hail Endgame: The proper cut!

sojonin bitch

@@rew1677 Your reply has nothing to do with this comment - please don't spam

@@jezeski2011 so sharing a video that helps people understand somethings and see this is spam. I only did this here once

@@rew1677 I saw you post this same link on 2 different unrelated comments (Here and one other) and the linked video had nothing to do with either comment. That is pretty much the definition of spam. I called you out on that other one as well and you replied there with the word "kool" which made no sense. I think the better course of action is to simply report you for spam and be done with it.

Considering they gave even Wall E some sins and that's one of Jeremy's favorite movies, I don't think so.

Yeah there was it was troll one or two (though it was a April fools episode

Wall E went to -5 sins, but it didn't last long.

The creed - Troll 2 didn’t end at negative sins though. It ended going up to zero.

Hateful Eight had -1 sins at the beginning

Was looking for a comment about this Thank you 🤣

@@angelo8306_ you were looking for a will smith comment in a cinemasins video?

Quantum entanglement dumbshit yank

"Dang, that's one messed-up lookin' dog!" - the police officer from "Ant-Man"

How to properly clean your metal computer see now are we talking about a Kevin Hart size any or a Dwayne Johnson size ant

@@theoneonly8472 a thor bjornson sized ant

MANT!

@@SteveSmith-wk9dx MATINEE! John Goodman ripped that! Also The Professor in the movie-in-the-movie.

Marvel establishes that quantum is totally random, though. Scott literally says in Endgame that the heist could work if they could "control the chaos." So yes, it could have just been thirty hours, or it could have been near-eternity. And she's definitely aged a good bit since then, so i don't doubt that she spent at least a good 10-20 years in there. Plus, she talks FAR too experienced for merely spending a few hours down there, and considering that Scott was down there for 5 hours and hasn't shown any quantum-bending powers yet, it's safe to assume that she spent at least a few years and most likely a decade down there. Ok, rant over.

Also not like they knew about thanos coming and the avengers in wakanda wouldn't have time to get to scott or any of her ant man franchise and the other part of the avengers were taken into space so there was no time to get Scott

Milkywolf Z Here’s a better question, did Thanos know that Strange would give him the time stone if the threatened Tony? Because there were already 2 times where Thanos had to threaten a loved one to get what he wanted: 1. Loki gives him the tessarect to save Thor. 2. Gamora gives him the location of the soul stone to save Nebula. Thanos didn’t kill any of the other guardians or Peter Parker during the attack on Titan, even though they were still attacking him, he knocked them out and left Strange alive because he has the time stone hidden and only Strange knows where it is and threatened Tony, then Thanos gets the time stone and leaves, but during the snap, the guardians and Peter Parker are dusted because he made no promises in keeping them alive, Thor, Nebula and Tony aren’t dusted because he promised they would stay alive as part of his deal.

The Elemental Penguin first of all, it wasn’t a question lol Second, I respectfully disagree. Although Thanos threatened to kill a lot of loved ones for the stones, and a lot did give him what he wanted to save them, there were still people willing to let their loved ones die to stop Thanos. Star Lord was ready, and prepared, to sacrifice Gamora. Scarlet Witch killed Vision to stop Thanos from getting the Soul Stone. Doctor Strange does not strike me as a person who would give up anything that important for anyone. He is very smart and he isn’t particularly attached to Tony or Peter. He literally tells this to Tony when Tony saves him-“when it comes down to saving you, or the Time Stone, or the kid? I’m going to choose the Time Stone.” Doctor Strange was completely prepared to sacrifice Tony, Peter Parker, and anyone else to protect the Time Stone from Thanos. But when he looked into the future, and saw the one instance where they won, he saw Tony somehow being instrumental in defeating Thanos. So he chose Tony over the Time Stone, so that he could make reality the one future where the Avengers won.

Milkywolf Z First, I knew you didn’t ask a question, I wanted to see if my theory had any ground to stand on. Second, I do respect your point of view too, but let’s digress, Thanos already obtained the reality stone without anyone stopping him, so he easily turned the blasts into bubbles and also unlike the other instances where Thanos threatened a life, he didn’t need Star-Lord for the reality stone. He was taunting him calmly because he could easily stop him at any time with the reality stone. Scarlet Witch may have killed Vision, but it was too late because Thanos already had the time stone and reversed time, but the ones who couldn’t sacrifice Vision’s life were Steve and the rest of The Avengers, they wanted to remove the mind stone in Wakanda then destroy it while keeping Vision alive, but since they didn’t kill him earlier, Thanos got the advantage thanks to the time stone. And also Scarlet Witch killed Vision when there was no choice, Thanos arrived and was ready to obtain the mind stone, so she regrettably killed Vision, but she wasn’t ready earlier, she didn’t kill him in the streets and because when they arrived in Wakanda they had an alternative, she didn’t think a sacrifice was in order until the battle in Wakanda was getting worse. All you said about Doctor Strange is true, he didn’t plan on saving Tony or anyone else until he saw the future, but Thanos doesn’t know any of that, and so I repeat myself, Thanos had to keep Strange alive because he hid the time stone. This is all just my theory and I don’t consider it fact and I’m open for any discussions because I wanna see if it holds up or not.

I like to believe that when Doctor Strange saw 14,000,605 scenarios, in 14,000,604 of them, Star Lord ruins everything; but in the one scenario where things turn out okay, he only MOSTLY ruins everything.

Wearing a helmet won't keep your brain from moving around in your skull should you hit your head hard enough. That being said Scott did give her some protection

I'm now going to make my primary concision..

The helmet would take most of the force or maybe all of it

And that's why there are never any concussions in the NFL.

@@eternalreign2313 Exactly

Hank is capable of carrying a shrunken tank in the first movie, and Antony is capable of carrying a shrunken Scott, so that error existed in the previous movies. I don't remember if that was sinned in the Cinema Sins video for the first movie, but maybe it was, and Cinema Sins didn't feel like being redundant?

In the same vein of logic, expanding objects like the toy train in the first one, the ants in both or the candy dispenser in this one wouldn't make them heavier like the movies suggest. In fact, for some of the enlarged objects, their buoyancy would likely make them lighter than air so they'd float away.

Haven't you noticed, big cities are conveniently empty when that's what the script needs? As with that school, where he even asked, "Is everyone on a field trip?"

Sin yourself if you must, but I'm still high-fiving you for that one.

ding

I appreciated that one.

It was just that bad