The Su-57 being hit isnt the flex of this story, its fact that Ukraine was able to penetrate up 400 miles into Russia nearly deliver a devastating blow to the Russian air force with a sub par weapon
I’ve been listening to Russian vet mix post about S400 for about 10 years now at the same time they were putting down Patriot. At least but the worst trolls will shut up now. The drones are probably covered in stealthy materials like these drones . The formulas are openly revealed even from german in World War II which were only 1.5 mm thick using ferrites inside of plastic or rubber. Anyway they’ve penetrated not only the Russian high frequency radars but the low frequency radars designed to detect stealthy objects.
Let's be fair. No one really knows the true assessment of the plane except the Russians.but one thing is for sure the Ukranians are intelligent enough to use fragmentation type explosive devise to render any item inoperable. Don't expect the Russians be forthcoming with truthful answers. They never have in the past . They will never do so in the future. 🤔🫡
An aircraft parked of the runway is not a COMBAT loss. Being shot down by another aircraft, missile hit over enemy airspace during a mission or flying into the ground to avoid enemy fire are COMBAT losses. Being bombed while parked, in in your designated spot on your airbase is stupidity,
You don't seem to quite understand what a combat loss is. Unless an airframe is lost in an accident or similar non-combat role, it doesn't really matter if the aircraft is in an active mission or back at the base. If it's lost via an attack, that is a combat loss. Same with soldiers who are k'd by an airstrike at their base. Even if they were sleeping/resting, that is still considered KIA ("in action").
2 месяца назад
Tell everyone in 10 words or less, you have no idea....
@@MaestroAbar 20 years in the USMC how long have you been playing war thunder? I was a Logistics chief for 7 of those years, I know what a combat loss is in reality,
@@MaestroAbar Well then it's still doubtful cuz these su57 are rarely being used but sometimes they are, I don't think over Ukraine however so ye. But that was 1st thing I thought too, combat loss? Then I think of a plane getting shot out of the sky lol.
Russia has only built 22 during their 14 years of production, that was before the embargos and the cost of their stupid invasion, they may be stuck at 21 for awhile
Do the Russian with two decades lag in advanced computing really have sensor fusion ? I doubt it Super cruise definitely not - they would not be busy developing a new engine for it 😅
Not really a combat loss. It has to be a loss during a combat operation to be a "combat loss". I realize we have to exaggerate every little thing Ukr does to make it seem like they are winning. But we must maintain our credibility at the same time. EDIT: To those taking issue with the definition of Combat Loss, I am using the marine Corps combat loss definition: A COMBAT LOSS IS DEFINED AS EQUIPMENT WHICH IS DESTROYED OR RENDERED IRREPARABLE DURING COMBAT OPERATIONS. The SU-57 Felon has not been used in Ukraine. This one was parked not in theater. It was not in combat operations or assigned to support any combat operations. If you don't like it, go talk to the Marines about their documentation.
If the aircraft was lost due to enemy action,that's a combat operation and a combat loss.It would be like saying the American losses at Pearl Harbor were not real combat losses because the United States forces were at their home station in a peace time posture when they were attacked. The Japanese were conducting a military operation when they attacked.Therefore American losses were combat losses.
its a combat loss Ukraine and Russia are in combat and it was an offensive strike which resulted in the loss of it Whether its in the air or on the ground if the enemy destroys it, its combat loss
@@TheLAGopher False. Being parked is not a combat operation. A combat loss takes place when a unit lost while in a combat operation. It has an actual definition.
funny they call it combat loss already xD wonder what they will tell about in a couple months, ghsot of kiew took down half of the su57 fighters with a YAK 52
I only see blurred photos and no SU 57 burned or destroyed, supposedly two drone hit the ground close to the plane..but if it were true, the plane would be destroyed and burned because each drone load 15kg of high explosive... so Ukrainian propaganda just paint by photoshop and spread propaganda in a difficult moment for them
@@bobdillon1138 15kg of explosive beside parts of the drone exploting close to the plane cause severy damage and the loss of big pieces of the SU 57, and we dont see nothing similar in the photos. Ukraine propaganda try to fool people.
