Flat Earth 'evidence' That SHOWS CURVATURE 

It was in the budget this time so why not.

​@Doom Rustler do they pay every single person other than flat earthers then?

@Doom Rustler stupid answer

@Doom Rustler Just tailored to the interlocutor, my guy.

@Doom Rustler I’m pretty sure he’s joking.

Damn lie

QUESTION? DOES A DISC (PAPER PLATE) APPEAR TO HAVE CURVATURE? IS IT STILL FLAT?

they're looking at; just saying.

@@kevinmould6979 I'm gonna go with it was probably late at night when I wrote this comment, but I should've caught this mistake. It's fixed.

​@@dougsdiagnostics6784a paper plate curves around the edges, but has zero droppoff curve. Also, the horizon is always equally far 360 degrees around. If you were on a paper plate earth, and further toward the outside or the closer you got to antarctic wall, the horizon would not be equally far each direction. As you'd be approaching closer to the edge of Earth. The only way the horizon would be equally far on a flat earth each direction, if if you were always standing directly in the center of the plate earth.

Ireland is out of render distance. You need to get closer before the server starts loading in those chunks. Press F5 when you get to the shore.

don't tell them about the moon then...

​@@jayarenneilson6049oh they think the moon doesn't exist and the sky is one big hologram put up by "the government" and bring up some crap about a 'project bluebeam'

@@ketdog1860 we don't have the distant LOD meshes for Ireland, they're packaged with the DLC.

Well you can certainly see the whole of the Isle of Man from the summit of Scafell. Ireland is not much further.

god dammit I just said that, my dude lol

Well, yea that's kind of a given

might wanna get with reality and look into the Antikythera Mechanism

What's a flerf?

​@@deanhall6045you

Thanks, Bob 👍

Got to love the Globebusters, they've managed to do more to prove a globe than most other people have 🤣

Thanks Bob.

Oh yeah i remember that they tried everything they could to insulate that, too. claiming "interference" eventually after putting it in an elaborate contraption to insulate it they still found the 15-degree drift LOL and what did they do with their findings they ignored them and pretended they did not see it

@@thecraftycreeper3167 , Well... they needed their revenue stream... spending $20,000 on a laser gyroscope doesn't provide them with the necessities of life...

Yeah, funny how we can only see a few miles at most beyond what we should be able to see on a globe based on geometry, perfectly explained by refraction, why can't we see, for example, Ghana from Scotland?

Yeah they can never answer the question of why I can't see the giant ice wall with a telescope.

@@charlestownsend9280 true, and yet we can still see Venus from here with a telescope 🤷‍♂️ one thing I still can't understand is how the northern hemisphere can be "explained" with a flat earth model, yet it quickly falls apart when you bring in the southern hemisphere, and that's why they show memes of Australia instead cuz they can't explain it away, so they just throw the south out of the window...

Its called "moving the goal post" Their entire flat earth model is based on it.

@@peekster0 It is also why no "smart flat earther believer" (aka con artist) will present positive claims for a flat earth. They will only try to "debunk" the globe because all claims made about the earth being flat are not backed up by reality.

Well said 🙂👌

No harm in taking the high road but it's a fallacy to pretend this is more likely to "bring them around" than just laughing at them. Who is being convinced to switch over? You don't see these people in the comments.

@@StealthBoyElite I said I don't think it will reach very many of them. Any approach will be minimally effective in a group like flat earthers. It think it might be slightly more effective than flat out bullying however. People don't respond positively to their beliefs being mocked. It's a good way to get someone to shut down completely, and if it's in the name of science that they are being bullied well then it pushes them even further away from the truth. I'm not saying this is some grand method for converting all flat earthers I'm just saying it might represent our side better if we aren't assholes about it.

@quinbatcheller5805 " A lot of flat earth debunk channels lay on the righteousness and basically bully flat earthers for believing what they do, and if that's the main focus of someone's content then they're just picking on people, and it's not very educational. " Hey, NotReallyAProfessorDave, are you listening? No, he's not. He never does.

I only was responding to someone as to why I have doubts about the globe model an RU-vid blocks my comment I've rarely hady comments just not posted if they are just my opinions an not rude or anything, an there need to preface anything they don't prefer with a warning over every video an there ability to only have pro globe info come up when your trying to look up the opposite is kinda weird but hey wat do ik I'm crazy for being skeptical of possible video editing

I love how you love that...oh and my dog loves how i love how u love that .. which, being palondromic andvall, proves that the earth is, as it turns out, flat... it just looks as tho youre a twwat bc of looming. Thats Q.E.D. aint it..

They're very very expert.

They are definitely an ex pert.

Like getting them to make working models, without ANY globular geometry.. hahaha 👍

They are the giant midgets of Flerftopia.

Isn't this the case with most citizen-scientists??

To play devil's advocate to your advocate, there is a maximum optical range that exists for our atmosphere (depending on atmospheric density and particulates in the atmosphere) that can prevent seeing those distances normally. But that is also a problem for flat earthers because the clearer the atmosphere, the farther we should see which is the opposite of what happens in reality. So if the Earth truly was flat, then flat earthers should see farther on clear days...yet is evidenced by their own Black Swan that is "clearly" not the case.

Flerfs: Wtf is km? How many miles is that? We are not smart enough to understand metric units.

@@Teutonius88 How long is a light year? Flat Earther response:- Well, it's very light so I'd say about four months...

@@chrisantoniou4366 Alternatively: A light year is a year with less alcohol/calories in it. :P

@@doublemonkey4833 😄

Have you seen a compilation of” IT LOOKS FLAT TO ME” You late on the agenda fam

I call it lies

A good educated pysicist from the government school

@@user-qk1lg7ll4ppysicist

Brainwashed

Never think you are stupid is how flerfs came to be

It also works when you question your sanity.

stupid ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-sA7jbRojtCM.htmlsi=qXNYJip0XcbTQzC9

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-EtIfX2TJ_08.htmlsi=hEkxXa9LDGoRTesi

Does it make you feel better calling people stupid? Most folks aren’t taught why they even believe in a globe earth. They just repeat what they were told.

Thank you, I will certainly aim to keep this vibe in my videos - although Nathan Oakley has published a video trying to destroy one of my videos that I need to address, so I can't promise there won't be some sarcasm creeping its way in on that one :)

it is still made up fantasy excuses of earth being a cartoon ball.

@@DaveMcKeegan Im sure its for a good cause so you will be forgiven lol ;)

I mean, tbh, with how condescending flerfs are and how confidently incorrect they always manage to be, they deserved the ridicule

@@mynamemylastname7179 earth is a sphere, this is a scientific fact. Your little fairytale called FE on the other hand got no working model, no working map and no science to support it. Maybe you should try to complete a science class instead of falling for every dumb conspiracy out there.

Have you tried doing bungee jumping at the edge of our pizza? It sounds like a great place to try but I'm afraid the giant flying turtle underneath might catch me for a snack...

If that was true, they would all have gone away by now.

And when they pass finger painting lessons, they'll be ready...

@@tysondog843 They have to stop eating their crayons first.

If that's the case, then the flerfers must be mad that their 8th grade science teacher wasn't interesting them.

No actually we are using you to explain it over and over again so everyone can hear how flippin stupid the globe is.

Yes. Reading their inane posts tells us nothing new about them, whereas when ppl with good science background explain/illustrate a topic, most of us learn something new.

yeah - it's always the refraction ... no matter what humidity or temp. loool this can't be always the fact - by definition not.

@@carlosdenevier9538 As said in this video, this only did get captured once and is extremely rare and isn’t usually there. If there was a flat earth this would always be visible lol. And even then the mountains aren’t the right height for the flat earth to work haha.

Honestly I'm kinda glad flat earthers exist due to this reason. Their unexplainable delusion has allowed competent folk to explain it away and teach me something new in the process

The flat-earth theory triggered so much thinking about topic we took for granted and let us learn about things we never ever thought of. They should get a prize for popularization of science!

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-EtIfX2TJ_08.htmlsi=hEkxXa9LDGoRTesi

takes two sorts of people the ones who follow and the ones who lead not all people are bright are we globe tards

​@dusmangi correct. Flat earthers are not that bright.

That's because they are either trolling or have sever mental underdevelopment. It's sad really.

I know they lack decerment !!like when they show the run bull jump. The flat earthers don't realize thatnew Mexico is really is half the size of the earth. . I live on the ocean Atlantic Beach.the moisture above the ocean is like fine mist it will not let you see the ship go over the curve. Even if it was flat same thing. Please flat earther explain the size of new Mexico. 🙄

@@johntabuchi6831 someone left their pickle in the vinegar a little too long.

@@henrysteel4049 you just here to say, “that’s a lie,” or do you have anything to add or maybe disprove something? Simply saying, “that’s a lie,” or false or anything like that is not an argument and does not make you correct.

you clearly have no clue what range of sight is. or how your eyesight works. you see in a clone shaped in front of you. objects disappear from the bottom up. because that is how your eyes work. I love how you still believe the ship is going over the curve when scientists say you will never see it. the objects aren't going over a curve or disappearing due to a curve. they are disappearing due to the limits of your eyesight and atmospheric interferent. just like when scientists say refraction that is atmospheric interference towards your eyesight.

It always amazes me when flerfers go "look, we can see this thing that is X miles away", because the answer is always "yes, but can you see what is Y miles away"? Keep going a little longer ffs, if the earth was truly flat you would be able to see any part of it from any other part.

I once had a nightmare that I could see the Statue of Liberty from my own building when zoomed in despite the fact that I was looking directly south and I'm in Croatia. If we existed on a flat Earth, the things we see would be marginally different.

@@manslaughter3180 If we existed on a flat earth the things we would see would be *radically* different.

I'm trying to manipulate this light beam, in my favour of course. You see, no expert, not even super stooge Degrasse Tyson can explain how a light beam, which cannot be manipulated, can hit a target let's say, 1,000 miles away. Sure, he tries to baffle you with absolute crap but he never fully answers the question, because he can't. Mate, I couldnt give a rats bum if Earth is round or flat, I reckon its both, but its inconsequential, it matters not to me. But when you see someone so absolutely committed to something, this guy has made heaps of videos ridiculing flat earth believers, so intent, hell bent on proving or disproving something, I begin to think something else is going on. Have you seen Neil shout down conversation with his hosts that even slightly question what he says ? That's a stooge at work, much like I'm guessing this bloke is, I pick stooges like a nose and here's one right here, pushing too hard. So,... light beam, ship 1,000 miles away, how can this light beam, which does not bend or refract, hit the ship. Over to you mate. I'm up for an explanation but be warned, bull shit don't fly.

@@carljohan9265 hahaha you're hilarious. You can with a good telescope, see a ship for days. How can you hit something 1,000 miles away with a lazer beam ffs. You people, because you outnumber the other people are so arrogant but can't respond to that simple equation. By the way, I don't care. It's round and flat.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-EtIfX2TJ_08.htmlsi=hEkxXa9LDGoRTesi

😅😅😅😅

Their next convention is in Australia

@@unnamedchannel1237 hahaha funny bugger...... you're all welcome here mate, but remember, most Australians don't give a rats arse what shape Earth is. Where the fish are biting is more the point. And is the beer cold? Come, enjoy. Cheers.

We even have some bell ends in India too 😂

No . Did it curve around and have country's full of buildings facing at right angles and every angle inc' upside down if you zoomed in from outer space and filmed all uk , usa, china, australia etc all at opposing angles ? but when you skype uk to usa and to australia all are same way up always at the same time ? explain please ?

@@stefan2005stefangravity.

That must've been one hell of an experience!

@@stefan2005stefan What the hell are you even on about, it's almost like you don't seem to understand how big the earth is and how high 55000ft is.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-qEaHjPF47_E.html

Flerf stupidity is a great excuse for the rest of us to learn!

@@redstonewarrior0152 No need to get emotional and triggered.

@@FlattyMcTruth I don’t think they were. It seems more like sarcasm. And this is coming from someone with autism that has a hard enough time catching sarcasm is speech.

The flat eart theory triggered so much thinking about topic we took for granted and let us learn about things we never ever thought of. They should get a prize for popularization of science!

Resist they can all forms of evidence and reasoning.

@@reidflemingworldstoughestm1394 There, there, you sad, spineless, lying, deceiving, fantasy-defending paid troll desperately wanting to keep their deceitful job. Hopefully, you have had all your jabs during the last two years, blatant deceiving liars, such as you, deserve all that comes your way.

Due to the Earth's supposed curvature having to be calculated by using a formula should tell people it CANNOT be measured, which means it is NOT scientific. The scientific method is to measure, NOT calculate, mathematics CANNOT make bodies of water bend. Mathematics is a formal science, a language, a descriptor, and, like any language, can be manipulated to lie to suit a model. The spinning globe Earth is nothing but a mathematical concept which always offers an explanation of how things could be possible without any physical examples, and people should base their understanding of reality in physics, what can be demonstrated, what can be directly measured and shown. He is also trying to use an intangible visual phenomena, perspective, the geometry of vision, as some sort of globe 'proof', and people do NOT look down at the ground when looking out to the horizon at their eye-level. People need to learn and fully understand how their eyes work with regards to perspective and horizons, parallel lines NEVER meet but perspective makes them 'appear' to meet at eye-level, therefore, you CANNOT use intangible visual phenomena as any sort of globe 'proof'. He mentioned "sea-level' more than once, level means, at the same elevation, in a straight line, from the starting point to the end point with no deviation in elevation inbetween, regardless of distance. Bodies of water CANNOT hold permanent convexity across their surface,. Bodies of water CANNOT conform to the exterior of shapes. When there is the very slightest of inclinations to the surface of a body of water it will flow to seek its lowest level, this is because a body of water has not got the ability to support itself on its surface, it is formless, its surface always collapses and find its lowest level. Water does not tell lies, people do. Therefore, if you have a ridiculous 'belief' which makes you claim vast bodies of water, vast oceans, can somehow bend around and stick to a spinning ball, then the burden of proof is on you to give a practical demonstration of a body of water conforming to the exterior of a shape. The burden is on you to give just one proof, BY PRACTICAL DEMONSTRATION WITH TANGIBLE SUBSTANCE that you live on a magical, nature-defying spinning globe with curving, adhesive oceans impossibly wrapped around it travelling at ridiculous speeds through a vacuum. Science is a method, NOT a religion, NO beliefs are required. Science should ALWAYS be demonstrable, repeatable and verifiable, if it does not fit this criteria, then it is pseudoscience, beliefs, religion. If people cannot practically demonstrate their claims, then they are just lying, deceiving charlatans.

@@tonydixon635 I know it hurts almost more than you can bear, but hang in there Tony. You can get past this. I believe in you.

@@reidflemingworldstoughestm1394 You have just admitted that you know it hurts, therefore, you must be feeling whatever is hurting you, I am not feeling any hurt, lol. I am just happy exposing sad, spineless, lying, deceiving, fantasy-defending paid trolls, such as you, for what you really are. You have NO PROOF, whatsoever, that you live on a magical, nature-defying spinning globe with curving, adhesive oceans impossibly wrapped around it rocketing aimlessly through a vacuum. That is because sad, spineless, lying, deceiving, fantasy-defending paid trolls, such as you, CANNOT practically demonstrate any of your spinning globe Earth claims. All you have is language, reciting religious mantra. Your job as a paid troll is to deviate away from objective reality with tangible substance and blatantly lie and deceive by trying to use intangible lights in the sky or intangible visual phenomema, such as perspective, as some sort of spinning globe Earth 'proof'. Science is a method, NOT a religion, NO beliefs are required. Science should ALWAYS be demonstrable, repeatable and verifiable, if it does not fit this criteria, then it is pseudoscience, beliefs, religion. Why do you 'believe' in nonsense you cannot practically demonstrate for yourself, you nutcase? You are just yet another sad, spineless, lying, deceiving, fantasy-defending paid troll desperately wanting to keep their deceitful job. Go and find youself an honest job and make yourself an honest living. Hopefully, you have had all your jabs during the last two years, blatant deceiving liars, such as you, deserve all that comes your way. If you have a ridiculous 'belief' which makes you claim vast bodies of water, vast oceans, can somehow bend around and stick to a spinning ball, then the burden of proof is on you to give a practical demonstration of a body of water conforming to the exterior of a shape. The burden is on you to give just one proof, BY PRACTICAL DEMONSTRATION WITH TANGIBLE SUBSTANCE that you live on a magical, nature-defying spinning globe with curving, adhesive oceans impossibly wrapped around it travelling at ridiculous speeds through a vacuum. Science is a method, NOT a religion, NO beliefs are required. Science should ALWAYS be demonstrable, repeatable and verifiable, if it does not fit this criteria, then it is pseudoscience, beliefs, religion. YOU CANNOT practically demonstrate any of YOUR ridiculous spinning globe Earth claims because YOU ARE just a sad, spineless, lying, deceiving, fantasy-defending paid troll, and shame on you.

Not like the flat earthers lol

The dog is in my opinion THE best of his vids🥰❤️

@@jasmijnariel It's just a dog though🤔

looks just like the dog we had growing up! now i miss her...

@@jimmorrison2657 never ever say its "just a dog"! 😱 dogs are gold

@@jasmijnariel Thanks for the info 👍

Flat Earthers have a hard time explaining volcaoes as well...

@chrisantoniou4366 Agreed. I was gonna mention volcano as well, but didn't.

No you don't get it the bedrock layer curls up around the perimeter and holds the dirt in

@@bacicinvatteneaca What? No ice wall? 😂😂😂

Fall off where exactly?

yeah, that's quite unbelievable some tards think we live on a pizza 🍕🤣🤣🤣

It s not normal to Ask question and Want to find answer by your own réflexion.

LOL, what an awesome image! Thank you!

@@ShizukuSeiji Thank you, I do try.

I agree so please read this slowly as I prove beyond a shadow of doubt that Earth is indeed flat AF... Ready? Earth is made up of 70% non-carbonated water. Therefore, Earth is as flat as a soda pop left out for a week! (-:

@@ironwillie7666 *H*

I've got a T shirt which says... ""I can explain it to you BUT I can't understand it for you".

You are describing the "Scientific Method". They are allergic to "Science"

not sure how its possible but you've somehow made yourself seem dumber than FE-ers....

@@henkhenkste6076 Go back to your fever dreams. Those video titles are hysterical

Correct, on a flat Earth everything would fade away into the distance, OR, we would see the edge, there would be no horizon...

@@chrisantoniou4366 the horizon we see is apparent. Vanishing point. Laws of perspective. Higher you go the farther you see. That's why in a jet at 35k ft or on the beach at 6 it appears to be at the level of the observer. If it was physical as in a curve away edge it would stay fixed and not appear to rise. This is based in scientific fact. It's testable for anyone. Unfortunately indoctrinated people usually don't have the ability to think critically and would rather keep their false sense of superiority and lack the character to consider they've been manipulated. I find the reaction almost identical to highly religious people's reaction if you call them indoctrinated.

In their giant pancake we would easily see the big penguin-nasa-antarctic-treaty wall from the arctic and we could just use whatever to destroy it

About 8.3 minutes.

They had to invent their own phenomena to try an explain how a flat earth might work - flerspective is one of the main ones. Flerspective is magic perspective where astronomical objects, like the sub and moon, don't change size as they move towards and away from us. It also means astronomical objects can magically get to the horizon, when in flat earth reality, they could never get near it. Finally you have already mentioned the compressing of the "bottom" of the sun/moon at the horizon. I am not sure any flerfer has ever tried to actually explain how that might actually be explained, or why only the sun and moon do it.

Rowbotham dismissed the change in elevation of Polaris as seen from different latitudes, as simply being perspective. One thng no flat earther has ever managed to explain is how those angles of elevation can be calculated in order to know what the observer's latitude is.

@@grahvis Thus his parrot Dubay spouts the same thing

I like to point out perspective is just a drawing tool. It cannot be used to calculate any thing. Other uses are just expressions

@@JohnSmith-ux3tt actually pretty much anything bigger than a certain size does it. Cargo ships, cities, mountains...

Globers are too ret@rded by cartoons to do it.

a curve cant stop curving right ?unless it curves back upward right?. think about that and follow that curve when you see the curve again....see where it ends...

@@stanlee4217 doesnt it just end where u stand? if u were to walk the entire globe in a straight line ull end up where u are because of the curve and gravity?

CURVATURE IS PRESENT (HORIZONTALLY SPEAKING), ON FLAT EARTH MODEL, LIKE THE CURVE SEEN ON A ROUND FLOOR MAT.

@@dougsdiagnostics6784 so now flat earthers are trying to prove earth is shaped like a round door mat? which verse in the bible does it say that?

oh, and do you know why the atmosphere is thin at high elevation?

Basic geometry proves that photo is impossible on a FE, no need for refraction. (And what you said isn't true in any case)

Atmosphere is never too thin to refeact light unless there is no atmosphere at all. Unless there is literally 0 matter in the area you are looking through, there will be some refraction

If I was a flat earther, I would debate that you ant see it due to the curviture of water on a flat object... Water does not flat out completely, it curves. Put a drop of water on any flat surface... So because now you have this big blob of water between 2 flatish points, the water curve reduces visibility in a flat view line... But, thats only my answer if I were a flattie 😂

"Don't take away my ball!!!!!" 😭😭😭😭

You definitely would not be able to because how dense the atmosphere would be over thousands of miles. Telescopes work to be able to see the stars and moon because they are not looking through thousands of miles of dense air. This is basic!

@@flatcat4078 it certainly wouldn’t be clear but you’d still be able to make out at least something…

@mikecassell8953 Not at all. Just look at observations of objects from 20-50 miles out. They are completely distorted by the atmosphere and atmospheric lensing. And you are talking about thousands of miles not to mention the laws of perspective and vanishing point would make it impossible to see as object get smaller the farther they are away. Even if Mt Everest was on the shore of Europe, you would not be able to see it.

They would not, because of atmospheric haze. Visibility is never 100% in the atmosphere.

@@wiggles7976 Obviously assuming it's a clear day, and your not stood in side a building and all the other millions of reasons why you couldn't. Jeeeezzz!

@@Facts_Are_Facts_Are_Facts Even on the clearest of days, imperfect visibility is a thing. We can't really test it though, because on those very clear days, things tend to disappear behind the curve before they disappear into the haze. Earth gets in the way and the atmosphere is curved. I cannot see how you could predict what would happen on a flat earth, and we don't have a flat earth to test with.

@@wiggles7976 You see the part that says "IF"?

@@Facts_Are_Facts_Are_Facts Yes, "if" is the whole point of the discussion and that has not eluded me. How did you predict visibility vs distance on a flat earth?

no flat earther "accepts evidence". they merely parrot off a script written by fraudsters to trick low-grade morons

you should really upload them then maybe people will believe you.with this theory all the ships should not dissapear behind the horison, but magically float upwards....please send photo

@@stanlee4217 sadly these people while not stupid in themselves, believe stupid things, and are so far down their own particular rabbit hole that no amount of undeniable proof will bring them back from the brink. The videos are available on my channel, in amongst all the other random stuff I've got on there

And yet, when we see all the images of Earth from space, and everything is exactly where it should be on a curved section of the Earth's sphere, they scream "FAKE!".

Don't forget they literally tried to turn the black swan fallacy AROUND to claim ONE extraordinary image means all the normal ones no longer count. As if ONE "black Swan" proves White Swans are a fantasy... the opposite of what the analogy is actually saying (that you cannot exclude something for not existing as it will only take one proof to show it does exist, like one image of a black swan shows not ALL swans are white.)

@@Ugly_German_Truths Exactly! This is why when flat Earthers yell "Fake!" and "CGI!" with regard to photos and images of the Earth taken from space, I tell them that not only do they have to prove that the image they are responding to is fake, but that EVERY image and EVERY video ever taken showing the Earth's curvature is fake, but also faked in a such way to produce exactly the curve expected from a planet 12,742 km across. In this sort of debate, whether it's a "black swan" (lots here in Australia) or the Earth's curvature, any number of fake images are worthless if there is just one true image showing the Earth's curve.

And during summer, at around 46 degrees (South) longest day is somewhat 16 hours . That means the sun should be visible around 2/3 on that latitude at all the time. Flerfs will need pretty much luck to make that happen on flat earth with their local sun. 🤣

The flerfs are very northern hemisphere centric. They can’t explain why the moon appears upside down in the south, why different constellations are visible/invisible, or why the stars appear to rotate in a different direction. The irony is that these are all observations they could make with their own eyes, if ever they could be bothered to leave their trailer park.

@@petrilaitinen4865 Not mentioning that the sun moves in a straight arch from east to west if you live on the equator. If the earth was flat then you should be able to see that the sun is moving in a circle above you. It should set north/west and rise in north east. But it sets in the west and rises in the east. As if the earth was spinning and the sun was still, or if the earth was still and the sun was orbiting the earth. But not flat. All they really care about is that the days are equally long for any place north of the equator. Ignoring the entire southern hemisphere and how the sun moves in the sky.

The South Celestial Pole is another nail in the flerf coffin.

@@MegaBanne - Not to mention, if the Earth was flat then dawn would occur at pretty much the same time all over the world. As would sunset.

"As the crow flies" is used in the US, but it's a bit archaic sounding in the 21st century

And now we have learned a new Swedish Phrase, "The bird path". Thank you.

I first read "as the cow flies". I probably watched too much flatearther content today.

Fågelvägen! 😍

Ditto, I can say the exact same. This channel is such a gem, and doesn't use conventional reasoning, but instead uses out of the box evidence, something I wouldn't even have imagined to look at, yet explains everything so well and precise, it's impossible to "debunk", unless you're a dubass flerf trying to shoot for the moon, which is obviously a fake at that point 🤣🤣🤣

I second that too! 👏

I agree although it’s hardly the first to achieve this and flat earthers continue to ignore any evidence that they’re wrong. Conversely by continuing to talk about them, it’s only prolonging their existence. Flat earth would have been extinguished from the start if people had of just done the sensible thing and just ignored them. But I guess the allure of laughing at the dumb dumbs out there is too strong.

Flat Earth seem to be like a cult to me now, they keep trying to prove the Earth is flat, they keep failing, but they still believe in that nonsense.

Agreed and well said.

Bombsights don't care about it because the bombs aren't traveling ten miles to hit their target. Artillery tables *all* have coriollis adjustments mate. We've had to adjust for it since WWI at minimum and all naval vessels have had to take it into account as well. Oops.

Thickness AND density! :D

This comment wins. Thanks for the laugh!

@@chrisantoniou4366 oh touche! Even better.

@@langdons2848 😊

@michael alderman So, apart from incredulity and ridicule, you have what?

This is their biggest weakness. They have been trained to demand evidence for the globe, to deny all evidence offered, and to avoid any requests for evidence for the existence of their own fantasy. It's just like trying to reason with a 3 year old.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-sA7jbRojtCM.htmlsi=qXNYJip0XcbTQzC9

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-EtIfX2TJ_08.htmlsi=hEkxXa9LDGoRTesi

Yet they’ll use it whenever they need to in order to debate.

just like gravity and perspective!

@@stanlee4217 What calculation is used when you want to workout somethings buoyancy? B = ρ × V × g 😉

@@stanlee4217, what's wrong with gravity? Your buzzwords buoyancy and density can't replace it. Perspective isn't what flat earthers thinl it is. They use flerfspective instead to fit their believes.

@@nikespits8728 To add to that, buoyancy uses gravity in it's formula. Flat earthers don't realize a helium balloon rises because the pull of gravity causes the air around balloon to be pulled down, forcing the balloon up. They also can't explain how having a difference in density creates a very specific vector of movement (why down specifically). Nor why two objects with different densities can still have the same acceleration if they have the same shape and volume.

Springers are the best, we lost ours a couple years ago they have a special place in your heart. Sorry for your loss.

You know that’s going to go over most people’s head. 😒

Due to the Earth's supposed curvature having to be calculated by using a formula should tell people it CANNOT be measured, which means it is NOT scientific. The scientific method is to measure, NOT calculate, mathematics CANNOT make bodies of water bend. Mathematics is a formal science, a language, a descriptor, and, like any language, can be manipulated to lie to suit a model. The spinning globe Earth is nothing but a mathematical concept which always offers an explanation of how things could be possible without any physical examples, and people should base their understanding of reality in physics, what can be demonstrated, what can be directly measured and shown. He is also trying to use an intangible visual phenomena, perspective, the geometry of vision, as some sort of globe 'proof', and people do NOT look down at the ground when looking out to the horizon at their eye-level. People need to learn and fully understand how their eyes work with regards to perspective and horizons, parallel lines NEVER meet but perspective makes them 'appear' to meet at eye-level, therefore, you CANNOT use intangible visual phenomena as any sort of globe 'proof'. He mentioned "sea-level' more than once, level means, at the same elevation, in a straight line, from the starting point to the end point with no deviation in elevation inbetween, regardless of distance. Bodies of water CANNOT hold permanent convexity across their surface,. Bodies of water CANNOT conform to the exterior of shapes. When there is the very slightest of inclinations to the surface of a body of water it will flow to seek its lowest level, this is because a body of water has not got the ability to support itself on its surface, it is formless, its surface always collapses and find its lowest level. Water does not tell lies, people do. Therefore, if you have a ridiculous 'belief' which makes you claim vast bodies of water, vast oceans, can somehow bend around and stick to a spinning ball, then the burden of proof is on you to give a practical demonstration of a body of water conforming to the exterior of a shape. The burden is on you to give just one proof, BY PRACTICAL DEMONSTRATION WITH TANGIBLE SUBSTANCE that you live on a magical, nature-defying spinning globe with curving, adhesive oceans impossibly wrapped around it travelling at ridiculous speeds through a vacuum. Science is a method, NOT a religion, NO beliefs are required. Science should ALWAYS be demonstrable, repeatable and verifiable, if it does not fit this criteria, then it is pseudoscience, beliefs, religion. If people cannot practically demonstrate their claims, then they are just lying, deceiving charlatans.

@@tonydixon635 Very big post. Thanks for replying. Do you realize that almost all measurement requires calculation? For example, if I fill a glass with water and ask you how much water is in the glass, you might want to measure it. But how? Well, try weighing it. Put the glass on a scale when empty, record the weight, add water, weight it again, record that, then CALCULATE by subtracting that first weight from the second one. Now you know how much just the water weighs. We know a liter of water weighs a kilogram, so take your calculated weight, so one more CALCULATION should tell you how much water you have, expressed in liters. A third CALCULATION can convert that to gallons, ounces, pints, whatever you like. Pretty much any measurement that is even remotely complex requires calculation. I challenge you to imagine, if you can, that the world might be a globe. Or oblate spheroid. Now tell me how to measure the curvature of that globe without any calculation at all. Or a different challenge. Imagine, if you can, that the world is a flat plane. Now tell me how many square kilometers in the U.S. state of Utah. Figure out this answer with measurement only, no calculations. Neither of those things can be done. Calculations are required for any complex measurement. That's just how numbers and measurements work.

@@tonydixon635 As I read your whole post, I discover that: 1. You don't trust math because it can be manipulated to fit any model. 2. You don't trust science because it calculates with untrustworthy math. 3. You don't trust vision because perspective is intangible. 4. You don't trust dictionaries because you never looked at the very first definition listed for the word level: "a horizontal plane or line with respect to the distance above or below a given point" That last bit is very important, by the way, since on a globe, the "given point" is the exact center of the globe. Think about it for a minute. 5. You don't trust gravity which always points to that same "given point', the center of the globe earth. This fits, since you don't trust science in the first place. 6. You don't trust proof that relies on math, science, dictionaries, or gravity, because the fact that the earth is an oblate spheroid has been demonstrated zillions of times since Eratosthenes measured it in 240 B.C. After all that, I don't know what could possibly convince you. You have built such an impervious set of walls around you unbelievably closed mind that no logic, reason, or even word definition is ever going to penetrate it. Carry on, I guess.

Or do it with the moon, which is less dangerous for your eyes :P

@@yourguard4 If you use a solar filter, as suggested, there is no risk. The moon would work but the apparent shape of it does change daily and that might confuse the flatties.

That's more comprehensive than most debunks 🤣

I'd take them to a lake or sea shore and say: there. water sticking to a ball.

figure out how the eye and perspective works.. and you'll understand where you live..truths: water doesn't bend. it finds its level. the horison is always at eye level. doesn't matter how high you go. you can figure it out from there.

@@stanlee4217 Water finds it's level? Then what are the Huge bulges of water that we call "tides"? If you Look at the horizon, then it's at your eye line. Why doesn't the Sun and Moon change in angular size as they move past, like Airplanes do? We view all through the same medium, the air... Why can't you see the base of the closest mountains? From the elevation of the photo, on a "Flat" Earth, you Should be able to...

@@stanlee4217 You needed to say "Ommm" after each shibboleth to have the required impact.

Ok hipster *I DiD tHiS oNe YeArS aGo*… Yeah but he did it better and for a much bigger audience 😂

@@Jamesfrancosdog not a competition.. just an acknowledgement that FEs keep making the same claims.

@@slysparkane808 okay... so acknowledge how they sent a lazer beam across the Atlantic ? No one is helping you here, how did they ? No answer, I already know that because I've asked it a thousand times and you are so convinced Earth's round yet can't answer a simple bloody question. Astounding. The arrogance is simply amazing but we've seen a bit of that these last 3 years haven't we ?

@@deanhall6045 "sent a lazer beam across the Atlantic" You would have to show me that, I am unaware of such a test. "No one is helping you here" I dont go looking for help. Not sure where you are going with that. "No answer" um.. How can I answer you while you are typing? "I already know" Cool!!.. show me this test. "asked it a thousand times" First I've heard of it.. "can't answer a simple bloody question" again, I cannot answer a question while you are typing it.. and surely cannot answer a question about something I have not been made aware of. "The arrogance is simply amazing but we've seen a bit of that these last 3 years haven't we?" I've been analyzing FE claims for 7 years.. I have not been shown this claim once.

@@slysparkane808 look harder, they hide it for good reason. It is very, very real mate, you can be assured of that. You don't need to go looking for help because there isn't any on this, only a schoolboy feeding sharks, read the comments. I already know because you can't. Cheers.

It also means any photos they take aren’t valid either

You forgot 'Nuh uh".

It's a meme gone wild

Well, only in certain circles. There's a group of conspiracy myth believers who search for the most unlikely myth to believe in, where you have to ignore *everything that works* and all kinds of natural science and instead believe in complete nonsense (silly memes galore, but nothing useful). Those like to debate reality and call everyone a sheeple that does "believe" in Earth being a globe. Science denial to the extreme, and great fun to watch them come up with hilariously stupid "proofs" for their pancake world - or when they try to disprove the globe model and deny gravity. They even try to make everyone believe that geocentric vs. heliocentric model is about the shape of Earth, when it was only about which sphere goes around which other sphere - even educated people in the middle ages knew about Earth being a globe, even though they had their measurements (and thus sizes) wrong, and that led Columbus to travel to India the wrong way around. They ignore even that moment in history, even though the majority of flerfs lives in the USA. Many seem to also cling to some fundamentalist Christian beliefs with some crude literal biblical interpretations …

It isnt🤣

A debate would require that both sides have evidence.

It's a mass de bate

Fight the flat earth.

might as well hold your breath, they don't understand how perspective works already as they use it to erroneously make their own claims. Trying to explain it to them just makes their heads implode.

@@Lorkanthal Exactly 😂

@@Lorkanthal Yes, "perspective" and "buoyancy" are examples of the incantations that they use as to stop an argument. I believe a rough translation from the FLERF is "Begone, demon!"

@@Lorkanthal And this is bad... HOW?

@@Lorkanthal No, saying that 8in/m2 = parabola would cause their heads to implode with the force of a nuke.

Flerfers are simply too stupid to grasp this basic point.

Fucking lol. I don't suppose theres any reuploads of it around? Would love to see that hilarity.

yeah your brother's cousin has proof of curvature.

you could actually just go to the website of the photographer where he explains it.

Never let Flerfs get into your head. They could end up trying to break down your beliefs by claiming well know concepts and stuff are false. Science is science for a reason. We don't just have millions of dollars wasted into making people believe in an elaborate false reality, which is what they're making it out to be. If you wanna know more about a globe earth, or to lighten your mood, go look at astronomy videos. Videos on Magnetars, Pulsars, Blackholes. I recently learned Blackhole Stars used to exist! Besides, Flerfs say to "do your own research" but then others use government documents to prove the earth is flat.

‘Professor Dave’ has explained, debated, and proven to the point of exhaustion, from every level of complexity. You are just …dumb.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-EtIfX2TJ_08.htmlsi=hEkxXa9LDGoRTesi

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-sA7jbRojtCM.htmlsi=qXNYJip0XcbTQzC9

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-EtIfX2TJ_08.htmlsi=hEkxXa9LDGoRTesi

You lost every flatter at “Earth…”

No Flerfs will say you're manipulating the numbers to fit your narrative while at the same time ignoring the science behind the manipulation.

Due to the Earth's supposed curvature having to be calculated by using a formula should tell people it CANNOT be measured, which means it is NOT scientific. The scientific method is to measure, NOT calculate, mathematics CANNOT make bodies of water bend. Mathematics is a formal science, a language, a descriptor, and, like any language, can be manipulated to lie to suit a model. The spinning globe Earth is nothing but a mathematical concept which always offers an explanation of how things could be possible without any physical examples, and people should base their understanding of reality in physics, what can be demonstrated, what can be directly measured and shown. He is also trying to use an intangible visual phenomena, perspective, the geometry of vision, as some sort of globe 'proof', and people do NOT look down at the ground when looking out to the horizon at their eye-level. People need to learn and fully understand how their eyes work with regards to perspective and horizons, parallel lines NEVER meet but perspective makes them 'appear' to meet at eye-level, therefore, you CANNOT use intangible visual phenomena as any sort of globe 'proof'. He mentioned "sea-level' more than once, level means, at the same elevation, in a straight line, from the starting point to the end point with no deviation in elevation inbetween, regardless of distance. Bodies of water CANNOT hold permanent convexity across their surface,. Bodies of water CANNOT conform to the exterior of shapes. When there is the very slightest of inclinations to the surface of a body of water it will flow to seek its lowest level, this is because a body of water has not got the ability to support itself on its surface, it is formless, its surface always collapses and find its lowest level. Water does not tell lies, people do. Therefore, if you have a ridiculous 'belief' which makes you claim vast bodies of water, vast oceans, can somehow bend around and stick to a spinning ball, then the burden of proof is on you to give a practical demonstration of a body of water conforming to the exterior of a shape. The burden is on you to give just one proof, BY PRACTICAL DEMONSTRATION WITH TANGIBLE SUBSTANCE that you live on a magical, nature-defying spinning globe with curving, adhesive oceans impossibly wrapped around it travelling at ridiculous speeds through a vacuum. Science is a method, NOT a religion, NO beliefs are required. Science should ALWAYS be demonstrable, repeatable and verifiable, if it does not fit this criteria, then it is pseudoscience, beliefs, religion. If people cannot practically demonstrate their claims, then they are just lying, deceiving charlatans.

@@tonydixon635 How does Radar "measure" the distance of airplanes at an airport? Physically measure them, or by knowing the speed that the radar waves travel, to "calculate" the distance? Flat Earthers rely on getting people to ignore reality, testing and evidence to Con you...

@@tonydixon635 you typed ALL that and you said nothing of importance. It's funny how you flerths always resort to "Practical Demonstration with tangible substance", but come up with some other stupid excuse when you are handed it. Not only that, but you are widely misrepresenting so many FACTS. It's not even worth trying to discuss this with flerths. We're all better off just calling you stupid and walking away, stupid.

@@vanbatim5906 I wrote how bodies of water behave, that said, how a body of water behave does not need explaining, it just demonstrates, the ability of water to always find its lowest level was here long before humans' ability to manipulate language and blatantly lie about it. Language CANNOT make bodies of water hold permanant convexity across their surface. The ability of water to always find its lowest level is NOT a 'conspiracy theory', it is a practically demonstrable, repeatable and verifiable SCIENTIFIC FACT AND OBJECTIVE REALITY WITH TANGIBLE SUBSTANCE. Water does not tell lies, people do, YOU DO. The natural physics and behaviour of water, fluid mechanics, proves, beyond any doubt, the Earth is a DEMONSTRABLY level. The Earth is said to be over 70% covered in liquid, water, a tangible substance, and water always seeks equilibrium, level, at the same elevation, IN A STRAIGHT LINE, from the starting point to the end point with no deviation in elevation inbetween, regardless of distance. Bodies of water CANNOT hold permanant convexity across their surface. Bodies of water CANNOT conform to the exterior of shapes. Bodies of water HAVE to be contained, the water will take the shape of its container, but its surface will always find its level. When there is the very slightest of inclinations to the surface of a body of water it will always flow and find its lowest level, this is because a body of water has not got the ability to support itself on its surface, it is formless, its surface always collapses and find its lowest level. Therefore, if you have a ridiculous 'belief' which makes YOU CLAIM vast bodies of water, vast oceans, can somehow bend around and stick to a spinning ball, then the burden of PROOF is on YOU to show a practical example of a pond, a lake or an ocean holding a permanent curve across their surface. The burden of PROOF is on YOU to give a practical demonstration of a body of water conforming to the exterior of a shape. Science is a method, NOT a religion, NO beliefs are required. Science should ALWAYS be demonstrable, repeatable and verifiable, if it does not fit this criteria, then it is pseudoscience, beliefs, religion.YOU CANNOT practically demonstrate any of YOUR ridiculous spinning globe Earth claims because YOU ARE just a sad, spineless, lying, deceiving, fantasy-defending religious zealot.

Yep. I've also seen the curvature, in the form of the hulls of distant sailboats disappearing, by submerging myself in a perfectly calm lake so that my eyes were just above the surface.

THIS PAGE IS A PROPAGANDA OUTLET. The missing 8 inch per mile curve proves the earth is not a globe.

​@@dfh658ok, keep taking the meds😂😂

@@darthja8292 THIS PAGE IS A PROPAGANDA OUTLET. The missing 8 inch per mile curve proves the earth is not a globe.

@@dfh658 so what is it then?

i mean i wouldn't. the god part that is. Like who tf drugged me

Some of them probably would crucify Jesus, unless he was Supply Side Jesus.

You believe in a God? Just as bad as flat earthers

@@Pabz2030 go back to r/athiesm

@@Pabz2030 clearly you win ‘stupid reply of the year’…. You missed the whole point of my comment… God, golden flaming chariots and flying white unicorns….. unless you also believe that I believe in the last two…. Anyway, I digress. Try understanding something before having an opinion on it next time.

You can never debunk it, you are just drawing more attention to it. Thanks!

@@Ben.DWater You commenting on this video is promoting it in the alg0rithm. Thanks!

@@lod4246 Yes I know it needs promoting to show how desperate you trolls are!

@@Ben.DWater thanks for the laugh, you lot are good for those

That is the Blackpool Tower photo!

Best part being, the photo was supplied by a flat earther.

And if you want to spend a hysterically funny hour watching people cry. Go look for the reaction videos where they try to explain how it supports a flat earth, but not being able to fudge the diagrams.

because i dunno, NASA wants to hide it?

@@LineOfThy I guess the other space agencies like the China National Space Administration., the European Space Agency, the Indian Space Research Organization, the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, and the Russian State Space Corporation are in on the deception as well, huh? The Earth is not flat. I am beginning to feel 'stupid' just arguing this point.

@@FATillery I'm just restating flat earther beliefs. I don't follow them. It's mostly satire to show, like you said, the absurdity of the situation.

@@LineOfThy Yes, of course, my friend. Please excuse me, I did not mean to imply otherwise. I normally skip by this subject, but the title caught my eye. Anyway, flat or not, we need to be better stewards of this place in space. We have no place else to go...

This video shows you how an ignorant person attempts to use circular reasoning to prove the globe! It didn't prove anything other than proving to all of us that he's a liar.

​@@multispeciesangleryou seem to be missing the entire middle section where he demonstrates how this works on a flat earth and ...oh wait it doesn't look at all like reality. Oops.

@@5peciesunkn0wn na dude. You fell for some real simple stuff here. Oops.

@@multispeciesangler real simple stuff is reality. The sun crosses the horizon. That literally cannot happen on a flat earth. Oops.

To them it's just words, they don't understand any of it.

That's the main thing I noticed about flatbrains, they can't accept not knowing or understanding something. It's clear to methey don't understand that it's okay to not know or understand everything. That's a horribly way to live life.

Check out Jtolan media... And wake up for real

@@sirweebs2914 Yeah. I try to be honest and curious. But sometimes DK-effect does rear it's ugly head up... Trying my best not to listen to it. I usually am fine with not knowing stuff. But there are some things where my knowledge - and the lack of it - overtakes my brain hehe. I like missing knowledge though. You can always fill it up! Just try not to do it with god...

@@MississippiDan1 Ahahahahah. No. Was that all? Because you are standing on very thin legs then.