FNAF 1 poster debate with Spook 

It's a poster of Papyrus making a parody of the Uncle Sam army recruitment poster? As to who Papyrus actually is, that's still in theoretical space.

Also quick note didn't Scott at some point admit that maypat got a early theory of his from 2015 right and said video stated the killer used gf

Thank you ^_^

Well to be fair, even if blackfootferret's theories are very convoluted and definetly wrong since you can easily see some plot holes, it atleast gives a breath of fresh air of the story it provides (even though it's a bit complicated to understand at some parts) Like, let's take a step back here from a moment, most timelines are really just the same thing, yeah, there's some ordering changes here and there but there's not much difference between them. Blackfootferret's timeline on the other hand is completely unique, and even though again, it's not what Scott thought, is still fun to look into with the way it incoporates stuff from the books and other stuff as interesting evidence.

@@queinthecarbink out of curiosity, what are those plot holes?

@@realzmt-productions4604 1. Ferret claims that fnaf 4 is a matrix containing jeremy/michael, teen henry/phone guy and william who all just got bitten, killed and springlocked respectively. Issue is, is that Ferret claims that after leaving both 4 and world's matrix, jeremy goes on to be temporarily freddy fazbear, and is seen having conflicting arguments with shadow freddy, with mike schmidt as the witness (who Ferret claims is pre-springtrapped William). So unless fnaf 3 is actually 30 years after fnaf 2, and not 1, and that mike shcmidt is a replacement technician after William dissapered, then this easily creates a loop/plot hole. 2. In the survival logbook, the drawings show a fixed state of the fnaf 3 office (which Ferret claims is from chica's party world) later on in the logbook, michael responds to some question, with baskets of money and baskets of exotic butters, something he could only have experienced whence going into sister location, getting scooped and turn purple. Plot hole is, is that Ferret claims SL is after fnaf 3, a.k.a. where we see set logbook office burnt, so like, did michael recieve the book only after SL? Speaking of the logbook, there's also the issue that if Phone Guy was the one doing the logbook, then that contradicts how he died before chica's party world was even a thing, so unless phone guy told "put the recent iteration of freddy fazbear's pizza office as the main hub of the book" then i don't see any work-around. 3. This one's minor, but in the fnaf 2 mangle kid's drawings where we see young michael, sammy and lamar rip it out, Ferret claims those drawings and events took place at 1987, however, the MCI was when the kid versions of set afton members were killed, so unless this is a different michael, sammy and lamar, there's not much of a work-around. Still, if you just ignore them, Ferret's timeline is pretty great and definetly overlooked, even though with how bizarre it is being canon.