Getting Things Cooking 

And I'm here for every minute of it! 😆

Facts

Who won the case?

free stuff

If he fixed it correctly, she wouldn’t have had an issue. The part he said was wrong did not fix it. She only wanted that money back.

​@@branbeelotuswhy are you asking

💯😊

What a great point. Thanks!

Already on it ❤. Reclaiming our time!

Facts!!❤❤❤

That's for tomorrow! Today is relax and eat some hoppin john.

Agree. She's cheap. She wants to buy old, low end, cheap junk and expects gold tier new, premium warranty service coverage on it.

Maybe it wasn’t affordable

Lmao you don't know how much the rent is. The tenant may be paying under market value so, they're gonna get an under market value appliance. On top of that, the majority of rentals don't come with appliances nowadays, and certainly not new ones, nor warranties She said the tenant tries anything to get out of paying, I'm betting this is more the tenant messing around with the stove then the stove itself

that depends on if the tenant is responsible enough to keep the stove clean.

I agree. We too are Landlords and whenever an appliance goes out that we’re responsible for, we always get a new one. We personally like to buy the “floor model”. It may have a small dent or scratch but if it saves us $50-$200 it’s worth it to us. This way it will have the full warranty. One of our apartments was completely remodeled and needed all new appliances, so we bought the floor models. The stainless steel stove had a small scratch on the broiler drawer at the bottom and the fridge had a small dent (looked like a tiny door ding on a car), but we saved $250 on the stove and microwave and $200 on the fridge. Two years later and the tenant destroyed the carpet in the bedroom, so they’re not getting their deposit back, as the carpet was an upgraded carpet. We’ll have to repaint the entire apartment as he was wheelchair bound and scratched the walls and put a small dent in a wall as well.

😂👍

He makes it sound like he offered her all sorts of things, but did he really? From her testimony, all he did was charge her $103 and got her nowhere. And he’s even claiming that’s part of her warranty! Glad she won!

WRONG!!!! for $53 she's wasting everyone's time

She was NOT accepting $53. She's a grifter.

@@batmang9014$53 that was owed to her! Are you a thief ?

@kay22100 no I'm not but given you're black you might be

Get back to me in a week. lol

Agreed! 💯💯

I was for the plaintiff during the trial, but she seemed a little weird in the hallway with Doug.

court is there to settled disputes, there will always be backups in court, because disputes, both civil and criminal, do not stop. Your rhetoric encourages numb nuts to settle disputes themselves and then you get the hatfield vs mccoys over 103 dollars. @@margaretakins6829

I've had them for years. Never a single problem.

I was shocked when she started talking

Defender handle your business

Yes

Good thing there are hundreds and hundreds of other tenants chomping at the bit waiting to get a place

I thought the same thing!

She's a grifter.

HOT POINT IS CHEAP SHIT.

wrong.....

@trekgirl65 That's the beauty of the world, I'm entitled to state my experiences and my humble opinions and you are entitled to scroll right past that $#!+ !!! Have a great day.

U think she wants to buy from him again ? Who won the case ?

She needs to just get a home warranty policy cuz it works just like car insurance. Pay ur 35 deductible and if they can't fix they replace. Electricity, plumbing, appliances, etc

I wish for universal healthcare like every single other developed country has. My goal is to make americans understand that this is the bare minimum your country can use your taxes for (ie to serve you).

I mean look at it the other way around, the defendant really couldnt just give her $53.25 back?

The plaintiff didn't sue the guy because she needed the 53.25. She didn't appreciate how he treated her, and she won.

Try using a less abrasive cleaner or scrubber. Scrubbing past the paint is unnecessary.

Omg, yes. It’s soothing

Surprised she she didn't make him remove them.

LOL - she's supposed to win everything she asked for because she's "beautiful"? I thought the ruling was more than fair. She bought a used, low-end stove and then is surprised it developed issues, and if that was a year after purchase, it was outside the warranty period his store offered. She would have been smarter at least buying her tenant a new low-end stove with a manufacturer's warranty and no history of unknown issues. Things unfortunately break, and you're taking a risk when you buy used, low end stuff with no warranty. Yes, you have to pay people when you have them come out and fix your used, broken stuff that's out of warranty - and many of them charge a trip charge just for diagnosis. $50 for that is actually very reasonable. JM regularly rules against people buy used cars when they have problems because "buyer beware", because they assumed the risk. I can only imagine why her tenant doesn't want to pay rent - I bet there are other things are poorly maintained too, because this landlord is clearly cheap and does the absolute bare minimum to get by, and probably doesn't maintain her property very well. This guy gave her the benefit of the doubt and charged her the reduced service fee since he couldn't prove she was outside the used sale warranty period. I had my old dryer repaired and it was like $240. Nothing is free.

Because $50 dollars of that was the service fee, no matter if the stove got fixed

​@@MrStv1163damn you got triggered

Nothing like a fiery red-head! My weakness. Lolol

Warranty’s are meant to be read by everyone. The seller, the insurance companies, the buyers, and then lawyers and judges if it comes to that point. Why would you ever get a warranty and just assume that it makes sense after the first page.

@@M2161 Do you read the entire Terms of Service for websites you want to access? How about for software you want to install on your machine? And if you do, do you really understand it all, screen after screen after screen? Not many of us do.

It's like terms of service and privacy policies. No one reads them, they just click accept.

Glad I'm not an "average person" lol

This plantiff was only entitled to 53.25. The other 50 dollars was for them going out there. Why should she get that back? None of us other folks get the service fee back. Has nothing to do with race. This should be common knowledge. But we all know you throw logic out the window when you see black folks on this show. Be better this year Adrian.

New Year, but you're up to the same ole bullshit. Evidence wins cases, not your lame feelings. So sad, I know you have potential but you chose to act like a dumbass every day...

And again Adrian shows his chauvinistic, racist, egotistical self through his commenting.. welcome to 2024, nothing changes

You thrive on comments. You always say dumb 💩 for people's reactions.

New fresh year, same old stale Adrian. 🤡

The way you think you know more than a judge is crazy💀