Gibson G-45 Studio and G-45 Standard Guitars - We check out Gibson's new affordable acoustics!

Подписаться 162 тыс.

Просмотров 92 тыс.

50% 1

Gibson has introduced a pair of affordably priced solid wood acoustic guitars that are sure to turn some heads. The new G-45 Standard and G-45 Studio pick up with the popular J-15 left off with the round-shoulder dreadnought shape that is synonymous with Gibson and the J-45. The G-45 Standard and G-45 Studio both feature solid top, back and sides with electronics and a hard shell case for $1299 and $999, respectively. A slightly shallower depth, paired with a walnut back and sides and a solid spruce top with non-scalloped X-bracing producing a lively, punchy tone from both guitars. To see how good these new budget priced USA Gibson Acoustics were we put them through their paces and compared what's different, what's the same and which one you are likely to want to add to your stable of guitars.
JUMP TO THE DEMO! 6:20
G-45 Standard: bit.ly/2mJ1F2t
G-45 Studio: bit.ly/2oobZ03
Guitar Buyers Guide → bit.ly/2kssXsR
Interested in a different guitar? Talk to an expert here → bit.ly/findmygu...
__________________________________________________________________
RU-vid: Pianos and Keyboards - bit.ly/YTpianos
RU-vid: Pro Audio - bit.ly/YTproaudio
♪ Contact us: www.alamomusic...
♩ Call toll-free: (844)251-1922
♬ Connect:
Twitter → / alamomusic
Instagram → / alamoguitarco
Facebook → / alamoguitar
#alamomusic #gibsonguitars #gibsonacoustic #gibsong45 #gibsonj45 #gibsonmontana #guitarreview #guitardemo #guitarcomparision #acousticguitar #chrismckee

Видеоклипы

Опубликовано:

26 авг 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 279

@flukyreview9128 3 года назад

Sold! After watching your video I went to my neighborhood Sam Ash and purchased the G45 Studio. Great quality guitar that does not break the bank. Thanks!

@paulsharkey6576 4 года назад

These are great, great guitars. Love the neck profile. Love the string spacing. Love the 24 3/4 scale (as always). This is a very unique Gibson, and I mean that in a good way. They did a couple of things that helped create the unique and beautiful tone The Walnut is unexplainably articulate....nothing like mahogany or rosewood...and the slightly thinner body brings a little more string out. The low end is really silky, too. It's an amazing experience tonally. The feel is even better than the tone. I played a standard at "The Store", and instantly recognized the magic in feel. I could not put her down. I bought it without hesitation. The necks, for some reason, are very straight, which gives you perfect punch. The nuts are cut really, really well. The feel is between an acoustic and an electric. It's that easy to play. The 24 3/4 scale helps with that. Normally, I'd give this guitar a 10 out of 10. At this price point, I'm giving it a 15 out of 10. There's only one thing I noticed. If you get aggressive in your strumming attack, her bass gets weak and she sounds thin. Strumming back closer to the bridge solves that immediately. It's mostly when you're hitting hard over the sound hole. That's about it. Just go to the store a try a couple. If you do, let me know what you think.

@emanuelb1154 4 года назад

Hi, so do you think the studio it's worth the money? Is it a really that a big difference between this and the J15/J45?

@jamescoughlan8193 4 года назад

Normally I would lean to the warmer sound of the standard but in this case I love the bright jangle sound of the studio. Both sound fantastic.

@OakLawnSpeedShop 4 года назад

1299 -999 is a $300 dollar difference when I went to school.....

@AndyDion 4 года назад

Just a extra $100, who’s counting, math is overrated

@haroldsanchez8235 3 года назад

Be nice

@mariodriessen9740 4 года назад

I just received my Gibson G-45 Studio and I love it already. I think it excels in heavy strumming. I also have a beautiful, warm sounding J-45 Standard, but that's a completely different guitar. If you're playing an acoustic guitar in a band, than this one (the G-45 Studio) is the guitar that's gonna make you be heard. It'll cut through the mix like a knife through a piece of cake. The guitar is flawless. Perfect action and intonation (right out of the box - and it had to travel a long way to and across Europe where it stayed untouched 'till I opened the box and the case myself). Very nice feel. It looks 'simple' yet classy (and I like that very much), it comes with a beautiful case and it sounds exactly like I wanted it to sound. Hats off to Gibson!

@AnAmericanGuitarist 4 года назад

Thanks for mentioning THE ACTION! There are hundreds or thousands of acoustic guitar reviews that talk about tone, woods, electronics, tuners etc. and no one mentions the action, which always leads me to believe that it's just another guitar that will put up a fight when you try to play anything elaborate, so it's yet another D C G strum guitar. I want action like my Les Paul on an acoustic guitar and I don't want to have to use a capo to get it. Gibson is my brand so I am happy to see them make these at these prices. I will check one out.

@Belgian-Guy- 4 года назад

Does these guitars have a large body? In some videos it looks like they’re really big and i definitely need a body that isn’t too big! I’m just really interested in these guitars, what a sound!

@mariodriessen9740 4 года назад

Tim Saelens ; They are big in the sense that guitars like the J-45 (the J stands for Jumbo) and the Martin dreadnaughts were bigger than as good as everything else when they were introduced, because guitars needed more volume to compete with other instruments. But that was a long time ago. For todays standards these sizes ARE the standards. They're as big as most classical guitars. When you walk into a guitar shop, 60% or even more (wild guess) of the guitars you'll see are this big. They're definitely not the biggest guitars you'd find. The G-45 Studio and the G-45 standard are just as big as the J-45. However, the G-45's are a little bit slimmer and thus a little easier to play.

@Belgian-Guy- 4 года назад

Mario Driessen thanks for the response man! I’m just in doubt because I owned a Gibson J15 and in my opinion it played not too comfortable. You think the G-45 Studio is more eay to play then?

@mariodriessen9740 4 года назад

Tim Saelens ; The J-15 is deeper than the G-45, so even though the sizes are the same, the depth of the G-45 is less, so that should make it an easier guitar for you to play. But I'm not you. It's hard for me to tell you what you'll love to play. In a perfect world you'd only have to visit a good guitar shop and try out as much guitars as you can to find the right guitar for you, but that could be a bit hard to do in times like these. Good luck! By the way, a triple 0 (000-15, 000-17, 000-18) could be more suitable for you.

@thomasrichmond1916 3 месяца назад

This one sounds really nice I went and took a look at one today and it was so bright I found. Left with my first Martin though so not a wasted trip lol

@davidsoltar5455 4 года назад

Picked up a G45 standard in August. I prefer both the look and tone of the gloss top. The lack of binding on the back of the studio also bothered me a little (although I think the real wood bridge and fretboard looks nice!).Absolutely loving it and would highly reccomend! Great demo.

@moodyvol89 4 года назад

David Soltar I just ordered the standard and can’t wait to get it in my hands, this one will be special to me for sure it’s my first American made acoustic guitar.

@johnwbanjo 4 года назад

Love the sound of both. Stiff competition for the Martin 15 series.

@raceface_m2579 4 года назад

The standard has a warmer tone- could be that gloss that calms it down. Definitely prefer the standard over the studio.

@MyBackHurtsALittle 4 года назад

raceface_m even in person the tone is significantly different. Standard tone is fuller, richer. Studio is more metallic/stringy. Want the tone of the standard for the price of the studio.

@dnottis 4 года назад

@@MyBackHurtsALittle Guitar Center just had a 15% coupon. They do them frequently.

@marcdellorusso180 4 года назад

The studio sounds a little too bright, and lacking in midrange.

@Beatles123ful 3 года назад

Great demo - your sound and recording is awesome - can really tell the difference the standard has much more depth and resonance. Also your detailed description is much appreciated.

@cecilia4630 4 года назад

Studio has a more open, woodsy sound. Def has more character than the Standard, and is cheaper. Gonna try one out soon

@1965kid 4 года назад

Just got my Studio today. Wow. Gibson really got it right! Amazing guitar for the price.

@EJ2K2K 3 года назад

How does it come set up?

@SeaDrive300 4 года назад

Chris, $1,299 - $999 = $300, not $200. Great review, thanks!

@MelodyMaker 4 года назад

I was wondering who was going to pick up on that.

@skaybaltimore 4 года назад

I came here to hold him to it and sell me the standard for $1,199. :-D

@Ngearke 4 года назад

I'm really curious to hear how you feel about these compared to the Yamaha Red Labels!

@austincouto4652 Год назад

Picking my Studio up Friday! So excited!

@roymoderatto 4 года назад

Hey! Back at NAMM I got the chance to strum each 45 body guitar, starting with the G-45 studio and sequentially up the price & appointments. I was surprised to find the Studio to be the best sounding to my ears, a bit bright, I'd have to agree... but in a way, it kind of resembles the sound of the new custom shop versions of the venerable J-45 this whole range is inspired from. Maybe it's the very thin mate nitro finish it has. Anyway, I think a recording studio would benefit with the sound of the most expensive version being similar to the most affordable from the bunch, as you don't need the looks and appointments if you're just tracking with it. My 2 cents. And it comes with a case! 😎

@janfrombelgium5410 3 месяца назад

The Studio version for me! 🖤

@jayman1338 Год назад

The standard nut width on a Taylor is 1 11/16 for all 200 series guitars. The 1 1/3 nut width starts on their 300 series and above.

@joeldeveau870 4 года назад

How about a comparison with the G45 Studio and Martin D10E.

@runnningonempty 4 года назад

D10e would KILL IT!

@peterdeboer9620 4 года назад

@@runnningonempty I've got one of each, and I like the G-45 studio's scale length better. Otherwise, they both sound and play really well.

@davidlward7998 3 года назад

@@peterdeboer9620 I have several acoustic guitars as well as electric guitars. It amazes me the different variations of sound you get from each guitar brand and model. In my opinion the sound from the standard on this video appeared to be richer in bass than the studio. Many people do prefer that bright sound the studio has. The standard sounds brighter than my Martin but bassier than my Fender. I just received a new dr-100 Epiphone that had been on back order for ages, I tuned it up and it falls between the Fender and the Yamaha acoustic I have. The Martin has the most bass. The Fender has the most brightness. The Yamaha, Taylor and Epiphone all sound different but fall between the two ends of the spectrum. My next purchases will probably be a G-45 Studio and a Guild D240EL which I have been wanting for ever. Yes, I am left handed!

@nate4472 4 года назад

A great move for Gibson. I can see this competing with the martin 15 series. A Relatively affordable, vintage inspired american made guitar...

@barrieglenn8353 4 года назад

I played Gibson, Martin, Taylor ( all new) in a store all on the same day out of all of them the Gibson J45 and the J200 sounded and played the best. Don’t really care about the politics.

@Mason_N. 4 года назад

There's a big difference from playing a guitar center floor model of the acoustics or going to a high end acoustic shop and trying one, there is a sound difference not every acoustic was built good and sounds good.

@Beachbumartist 3 года назад

What is the depth? 4 inch maybe? Thanks

@falcongunner33 4 года назад

Sounds great but imo you can't beat a used Martin MMV. Rosewood and spruce for around $1,000. Sounds a lot like a D-28, absolutely magical.

@51Dss 4 года назад

had to google martin mmv...apparently that model number does not appear in any Martin catalogs. are you sure it is a genuine Martin guitar and not a fake?

@falcongunner33 4 года назад

@@51Dss It's definitely the real deal. It's a guitar center exclusive. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-cNy-M5xfnQk.html

@99cobra01 4 года назад

It sounds like the Standard is a little more mid focused. I am leaning towards that. Both sound good for the price.

@joshro1923 4 года назад

Can you do a review on A Martin custom D mahogany this guitar is made in the USA and is all solid wood. They're in the same price range as the g45.

@davidsargeant9312 4 года назад

Many thanks for your demonstration. You always do excellent demos. Really enjoyed your demo with the Yamaha red label series, especially the FGX5. Can’t really find any of them to try out yet though in the U.K. Have you had any in stock in Texas? Cheers Dave 👍

@kenster007 4 года назад

I like mine more than any other Gibson I've had because of the satin neck. Not sticky like all the others I've had. I bought the standard for the top but I wish it had the walnut bridge and neck. Richlite is proven good I just like the look of the walnut. Badass guitar that didn't break the bank. Gibson hit it out of the park for sure.

@moodyvol89 4 года назад

Kenster 61 got mine ordered can’t wait!

@kenster007 4 года назад

Update-put some martin extra lights on it and now it really sings. I thought it was me just getting used to it slowly. Truly a joy to play now-sad I waited almost 2 weeks to do it.

@jacoblim6621 4 года назад

Wonder how the G-45s measure up to the J-15. Hope you would do a comparison video for these 2 models.

@roymoderatto 4 года назад

Jacob Lim G-45 studio best resembles the very expensive custom shop one from the 30's... it's so much better than the G-45 Standard and the J-15, IMHO. Better even than all the J-45 versions, Slash's included! Only the Custom shop ones sound closer to the vintage ones.

@jacoblim6621 4 года назад

I'm really looking forward to try out a G-45 studio

@svfutbol20 4 года назад

The J-45 is better, but I don’t think it’s $500 better.

@HenryPipes 4 года назад

svfutbol20 $500? The studio is $999 and the J45 standard is $2800. That’s an $1800 difference.

@svfutbol20 4 года назад

Joshua Henderson J-45 Studio is about $1500, which was the comparison I was making.

@fabienares5577 3 года назад

I'm waiting for my Studio! Thank you for that great review dude 👌

@clawhammer704 4 года назад

The studio sounds louder and puncher. I never seen a guitar with a rich lite fingerboard that didn't sound muffled. Even Martin guitars with them. However the standard looks better but I'm going for a guitar that will punch through in a group setting.

@BkBk-gy6vr 2 года назад

I bought a Martin Road series with Richlite and it was a good guitar but then I played a Martin Road series with an ebony board and it was definitely better.

@ozpunk 4 года назад

Just got a G-45 Studio and i love it

@nicolasvaucenat7978 Год назад

brighter than martin with more definition to my ear. Great guitars!

@michaeltrowbridge7174 4 года назад

Studio to me has that nice deep tone

@stricknine8623 3 года назад

Very helpful service for shopping. Also the guitar playing is very good !!

@AlamoMusic 3 года назад

Thanks a lot! (:

@eljison 3 года назад

Thank you for this informative video. Check your math though, $1299-$999= $300 not $200. They sound really nice.

@playandsinger 4 года назад

Studio sounds better. I was intrigued until you said 16' radius. I like '12. That being said, I like my Eastman E1ss-ltd for $800.

@vincentwong1060 3 года назад

Both absolute Winners! I’m going to get one of this, thank you Chris you’re the man !!!!!

@dr.doomm.d.ph.d.4486 4 года назад

You can immediately hear that the studio's top is a little more free to vibrate with the thinner satin finish. Definately catches my ear as being way more unique sonically. Would really love to hear this compared to something like an Alvarez Mastercraft OM60 unplugged. Nearly impossible to find either of these guitars in stock where I'm at, so I can't cross shop these two. Really wanna hear the tonal differences. Thanks for the reviews guys. They always help a ton.

@paulsharkey6576 4 года назад

And the Walnut on the studio sounds spectacular.

@DennysPlantBasedJourney 4 года назад

how do you compare this to the new Yamaha red label or the A5R or A5M? Between these three, what is your favorite?

@aghielahmadi2539 4 года назад

Wich one do you prefer and why? Yamaha fgx5 or Gibson g45 standard? Thanks 🙏

@maxwellfan55 4 года назад

Gibson have hit onto something here, deservedly so. You're getting a lot of guitar, great sound, comfortable neck, slope shouldered, hard case, pick-up, and it's a USA Gibson. The walnut makes it interesting, visually and acoustically different. To my ear the Standard sounded just a wee bit sweeter. Serious competition against what's out there.

@jamescoughlan8193 4 года назад

Yes nice to see some good Gibson news for a change.

@TheClandestineArmory 4 года назад

Ok Quick question! Every review I have seen people are saying it’s a non scalloped x bracing but Gibson’s own website states that it is “traditional scalloped x bracing” who’s right???

@antonio.lovric Год назад

I own G-45 Studio. I think Gibson realize these guitars are too value for the money, and they discontinued it. Now, they sell this new G-45 with playerport, but the buid material quality is not so good as the original G-45 Studio/Standard. Also, the new G-45 have no pickup at all, no binding, and they provide gigbag instead hardshell case. I upgrade my guitar with LR Baggs Anthem, bone saddle and pins, and redwood arm rest. With these upgrades my G-45 Studio is almost the same guitar as J-45 Studio Walnut. Maybe even better because of Anthem. But for half of the price 😬 I was so lucky because I had a chance to buy one of the last G-45 Studio in Europe 2 years ago.

@davidwonpu353 3 года назад

PSA: Gibson updated the Standard in 2020 by swapping out the Richlite board and bridge for rosewood and now call it the “G-45 Standard Walnut.” I liked the Richlite more. You do you nephew.

@jnspincliffe2 3 года назад

Any significant differences in tone / feel?

@davidwonpu353 3 года назад

@@jnspincliffe2 YES! Richlite is like ebony, so much smoother in feel, whereas rosewood has a more "grainy" feel. You also never have to oil Richlite. Visually, Richlite is dark, so it has more of a contrast, although some people don't like how the bridge feels if you rest your palm there alot. Rosewood is warmer in tone, and I must say that I don't feel Richlite has much of its own tone really.

@51Dss 4 года назад

seems like the new G45 standard is pretty much the same thing as my J45 studio that I bought last year...which I love it. Seemed like an amazing value all solid construction Spruce over Walnut, hard case, leather strap, electronics...all for about $1400

@charlespatrick8650 4 года назад

51Dss J-45 Studio is a better choice if you can pay the extra cash, otherwise the G-45 Studio is the way to go on a tight budget imo

@MyBackHurtsALittle 4 года назад

I prefer the G45. The neck feels better and plays better for flatpicking imho. 16” radius vs 12” on the j45

@OutdoorsWithJosh1990 3 года назад

Awesome Demo brother 🙌

@rjherra9285 3 года назад

I feel like the studio is a little less Gibson esk in the tone, and it sounds almost more like the Taylor's I have heard. The standard has a little bit more of that twang mixed into the blended chords so where each string can be heard in a chord but it doesn't sacrifice the overall blendedness of the chord which is why I want a Gibson acoustic in the first place.

@watchfan6180 2 года назад

Where is Cooper? Nice to see you.

@dcarts5616 3 года назад

I have LOVED the Road series from Martin. My old DRS1 was beautiful, played strong, smelled great BUT being Mexico 🇲🇽 made vs American 🇺🇸 made I’ll be looking at the Gibson for my next “entry” all solid wood American 🇺🇸 guitar. Thank you Gibson for putting America first with this lineup.

@connorkrier342 3 года назад

I played both of these not to long ago and I kept going back to the standard. I thought the low end sounded much better. It’s all for what u are looking for though of course.

@JAZZMANICK 4 года назад

For solo guitar -instrumental tunes I like the studio ... In accompanying my voice the standard makes me sound ''better'... Tried a vocal impro over these great demos here .. .

@keithrevst692 3 года назад

$300 difference in price. I prefer the studio that is why i bought it

@boyax_biker2367 3 года назад

Gotta try them out soon lol. I like the triple O.ec neck profile but it is way too expensive for me. Tnx for da review sir. Good job!👍🏾👍🏾✌🏾

@samhealey7603 4 года назад

Thanks for your review guys, as a round shoulder with reduced body depth, how do you guys think this holds up as a finger style guitar? Thanks!

@AlamoMusic 4 года назад

I've heard it used finger style and I personally like it! The only thing is that a lot of stuff like that is heavily influenced by taste. However, its a great guitar and I think it would work for you!

@davegover6636 3 года назад

just ordered the G45 studio.loved the video,.liked the gibsons better than than the martins i played .D15 and the D10. plus the G45,s are made in the U S of A

@koolkobes 3 года назад

Not sure if you’ll ever see this, or anyone who see’s this... what song is he playing around the 8 minute mark??! It’s beautiful.

@blanchedesmas 4 года назад

Main differences between the Standard and the Studio models. Is it worth paying $400 more for the Standard model?

@AlamoMusic 4 года назад

A lot of it is preference. If you like the sound of the studio more then I would say it is. However, if both sound and play the same to you then you are probably fine with the standard (:

@teamociljunkie 3 года назад

@@AlamoMusic I think you reversed "studio" and "standard" in your reply here

@upcycleelectra8311 3 года назад

Great sounding Guitars both.. is it worth the extra $300 Difference for the standard either way with a case decent value for money

@eljefe6782 4 года назад

Love the video comparison. Made me go out and get a Standard. What are the names of the songs you are playing?

@Beachbumartist 3 года назад

Sucks they has discontinued that model now. Was hoping to buy one

@skiracer8148 4 года назад

Always look forward to your reviews, you are very knowledgeable.

@DeltaJazzUK 3 года назад

Lovely dem. The Standard sounds gorgeous to my ears, more refined than the Studio. I wish they hadn't put a Richcrap fingerboard on it though.

@bennicod655 3 года назад

I believe the fingerboard is walnut

@kevinpaul1698 4 года назад

thanks.. it was very informative :)

@AlamoMusic 4 года назад

Most welcome!

@GaryHudsonsMusic 4 года назад

Excellent review. Thanks.

@jag1099 4 года назад

Yes! Thanks for doing this demo!

@jski718 4 года назад

What is the song that you're playing at 8:01?

@garlicmayo96 4 года назад

It's beautiful! I really want to find out what it is!

@Blakely901 4 года назад

Believe it’s a song he wrote about his daughter I think I remember him saying in a video. I know for sure it’s his thoug

@yoshi6094 4 года назад

Great Vid thanks. Been anxiously waiting for your review of this guitar. I did notice your not as excited about this guitar like you were with the new Yamaha Red Label FSX5 & FGX5(Made in Japan). Dont have models @ my local shop to try so which would b a better choice @ this price point?

@haroldsanchez8235 3 года назад

Wow my ears have never been so excited this guitar sounds amazing It’s looks old school and made in the USA excellent video Chris -SOLD - Being from S. Tx I’m getting my at the Alamo Orale Homs 👊🏽

@MrArgraber Год назад

New to Gibson will this guitar keep its Value. In 15 20 years I understand that's going to depend on how the thing was treated if it was beat up or things like that I'm talking about someone who takes good care Of their instruments

@jeffhildreth9244 Год назад

at 4:41. "$200 bucks difference.. one is 999 and the other is 1299." I believe that is $300 not $200 difference. Gibson's "default" nut width has been 1 23/32" for many decades.

@ronaldomac4918 4 года назад

I like the Standard, think I will be purchase one of these for sure............

@bigcole9832 2 года назад

Wonderful video,tell gibson to thank you i think im gping to get the studio...

@johnrlott4002 4 года назад

I can’t wait until they make a lower priced guitar with a slim neck profile. The advanced fatigues my hand. Almost like it was designed exactly opposite of what I need. Sold my J-45 studio because of it. J-45 standard it is.

@andrewptob 4 года назад

Standard sounded noticeably better to me. More presence/warmth. The mid-range in particular was much more responsive to my ears.

@donttalktome4696 4 года назад

It seems odd that the standard has a richlite board.

@donttalktome4696 4 года назад

I associate richlite with cheapness

@mariodriessen9740 4 года назад

Yet richlite is more expensive than ebony.

@moodyvol89 4 года назад

I’d thought the same thing but from what I have read about it it has an advantage over regular wood because you don’t have to maintenance it with oil so it never drys up and shrinks. Apparently they have used it since the 40s on various instruments and it outlasts wood .

@Harp_and_Guitar_Moving_Forward 4 года назад

@@moodyvol89 cause it's not real... wood requires maintenance

@tomformanek3312 3 года назад

Taylor has an excellent video on why ebony is disappearing. Even EI rosewood is being used up. Morado, laurel and pau ferro are substitutes now. I have a Martin D10e and I happen to like the punch it delivers. Richlite is a combination of paper and resin. It is part wood product. My own thought is that guitarists are excessively purists. Get over it. Most of us will not be broadcast live from Royal Albert Hall. Of all the tone imparting components, the body wood, the saddle and the pins seem to have more effect.

@claytonmoss1 Год назад

So did you use the Fishman at any point during this demo? 🤔

@philipsanders7694 2 года назад

There is a maker called driftwood guitars who says these are crap, he cut one in half on his youtube channel and criticised almost evey aspect of the instrument, sound,build quality, finish and in particular the logo on the headstock only being painted via a stencil. When I challenged him to do the same tests on one of his guitars he refused as it is not a factory instrument

@johndavis7112 3 года назад

Have you reviewed a D21 ?

@zieemar9660 4 года назад

Gibson G45 Studio or Martin D10e (Road Series)?

@AlamoMusic 4 года назад

Depends on taste! They are both pretty similar and good quality guitars! The Martin does come with a gig bag though! Is there something specific you're looking for in a guitar?

@queikiwili 3 года назад

GIBSON G-45 STUDIO or MARTIN D-10E? I need to know!

@aaron4757 3 года назад

G-45 Studio

@queikiwili 3 года назад

@@aaron4757 why?

@aaron4757 3 года назад

@@queikiwili it looks better in my opinion.

@aaron4757 3 года назад

@@queikiwili also the Gibson will hold its value better, because made in USA...

@marlonadsuara4257 3 года назад

for me I will get both but i dont know who comes first depends on the availability on the dealers in our country

@kevinjboconnor 4 года назад

I don't like the depth/size of the guitar. It feels miniature to me, as someone who has only played fullsize dreadnoughts. That said, I really enjoy the tone of the guitar....very woodsy, better than the Martin D10e I had also considered.

@warmonger9100 4 года назад

I am going to have to try one out. I do like the sound and the price point is nice.

@MezzMcGillicuddy1 2 года назад

Amazing guitars, but the Studio sounds better IMO. More articulate, I think the fake wood on the Standard kills some tone. I have no idea what the new ones with the hole in the side are like.

@edwardamick8000 2 года назад

What’s the difference of the J 45 studio vs the G 45 studio other than binding, fret board wood & finish? That doesn’t equal a 1,000 dollar difference

@szymonwarzocha4345 4 года назад

Hello Chris, I've been watching your channel for a long time, I think you are doing a great job! I'm going to buy an electro-acoustic guitar but I have a dilemma. I was thinking about the Epiphone masterbilt 400 mce, but maybe it's better to add some money and buy a Gibson? You played both, what would you choose for yourself? Is there a big difference between these instruments?

@Rudigervocals 3 года назад

Sounds great , whats the mic ? and thanks for a awesome video

@jeremydeats9406 4 года назад

The 2020 model G45s are now traditional scalloped X bracing. I know they were non-scalloped when they released. I wonder why Gibson changed this

@dudemandudebro938 4 года назад

Really? So none of the 2019 have scalloped bracing?

@flukyreview9128 3 года назад

I think only the G45 standard has the X bracing. The studio does not.

@nutritionandfitnesscoach7267 3 года назад

I am looking for a Spruce / Walnut guitar and I wonder how the G45 compare in sound and playability with the Taylor GS Mini .

@who_cares848 2 года назад

Great video, just convinced me to buy a used one on musicians friend. I've been playing the same $300 epiphone acoustic for almost 20 years and it's worn the fuck out.

@marlonadsuara4257 3 года назад

Starndard looks better but I dont like glossy top. Im ok with studio with detailed treble sound.

@bozopennywize 4 года назад

Very nice comparison. It seems that for me the Studio version sounds clearer compared with Standard. However, is walnut fretboard strong enuf? I heard that walnut is not a hard wood

@51Dss 4 года назад

from what I recall in my high school wood shop classes walnut is plenty hard enough and IMHO the grain and deep colors are every bit as pretty as any kind of rosewood. Also want to point out Black Walnut is indigenous to north america and it is not an endangered species of wood - like rosewood for example.

@bozopennywize 4 года назад

@@51Dss agree with the pretty grain and colors. nice info btw. thanks.