Mike and Jay discuss Quentin Tarantino's new film Django Unchained, starring Jamie Foxx and Christoph Waltz, and recount some films they've seen in 2012 that they forgot about until just now.
Yeah, she has a really low opinion of the mental functioning of the average 12 year old. I mean, if it were up to me I probably wouldn't let my 12 year old child watch a Tarantino movie anyway (because it's the fucking parent's job to do that shit, and some old lady shouldn't be bitching on the news about how there's a violent movie, as if the problem is the movie itself and not that a parent is bringing their 12 year old to see it), but honestly, I think most 12 year olds are perfectly capable of watching a movie like this anyway. I mean fuck, conservative American mothers should love it. Loads of people get killed, and nobody has sex, because violence is fine but sex is evil. Tear a guy's head in half if you must, but for the love of god don't show a bare breast. Please, won't somebody think of the children?
there poses a huge moral question. we know most ov the kids will be barefoot with lots ov close ups ov the kids feet. now... is this porno? normal people dont get off on feet like the Tara does but he... he most definatly will. im not one ot kink shame but thats pedophilia right? or is it only jailbait if its normal sexual? >.> asking for a friend.
Since apparently nobody did that: 20:11 - Recap starts 20:19 - Lincoln 24:45 - MIB 3 26:29 - The Master 28:27 - This is 40 30:48 - The Comedy 32:41 - Excision Looking forward to 2013 starts at 35:00
@@fuzzydunlop7928 Are you kidding me? Have you heard the troll talk? He talks about black people/culture like he talks about women's feet. Same mannerisms. I kid you not.
Musket balls used to shatter the bone which led to large numbers of amputations. Minie balls were being used in very large numbers by the Civil War also, which were conical projectiles fired out of rifled muskets, which had devastating effects on the body. Those lever action rifles in the movie used modern brass case cartridge and the revolvers could have used either brass case ammo or have been loaded with ball and powder
Oh my fucking devil, that was KRON 4's Jan the Hat Lady, my local news channel here in the great Bay Area California. Old footage, probably from the late 90's/early 2000s. Never got to see Quintin Tarantino put her in her place before, ahaha. Awesome
Imagine this: An alternate history earth where Paul Verhoeven made Aliens, with the same script, and James Cameron made RoboCop with the same script. I'm curious what the Veroeven Aliens would be, but I think the Cameron RoboCop would be a forgettable '80s action movie. RoboCop is an example of the perfect script meeting up with the perfect director. I seriously believe that nobody else could have made RoboCop as great as Verhoeven did, that's one of those times when everything just fits together perfectly. I'm not shitting on Cameron with that, I love Aliens and Terminator and Terminator 2, it's just that RoboCop is a lot better than it should be. It should be an incredibly stupid movie that killed the careers of everyone involved and was forgotten about a year later, but against all odds it's fantastic.
compared to Most of his other movies Tarantino shot this pretty straight forward. Specifically camera work, and with narrative. I kind of felt like he was sleepwalking through it, but then I realized that he's just not going overboard with camera tricks and story structure
I actually enjoyed the scene with QT. He didn't say enough to damage the film overall, and the scene was really important in showing the evolution of Django as a character. I also agree that the story was constructed strangely, however.
Hey, that Lincoln comment was exactly what I said! I liked it but I thought it would focus on the man. Men In Black 3 was a lot better than the second. They retcon K and J's relationship a bit but it actually worked really well. I loved the end.
He said "interesting" female characters are one of Tarantino's strengths. That's definitely true. The Bride from Kill Bill and the jewish girl from Inglourious Basterds were both very unique and interesting, if nothing else. Django's wife didn't really stand out or seem that memorable in Django Unchained, though.
@@theheebs100 his first film was what's eating Gilbert grape, he was up for an oscar for it and he was amazing. He's great, but I think he's somewhat reliant on a director to be great. Mike had a personal vendetta against him for whatever reason, but has changed his mind since once upon a time in Hollywood
it is 10/1/2016, 6:36pm Someone please explain to me why there's adds for BUILD-A-BEAR on Mr. Plinkett's channel, on a video that's about an R-rated grind house movie about slavery??
That's so funny, Jay, because 99% of the time I can't stand Dicaprio, this is one of maybe, 3 movies, I really like him in. Quentin is very good at getting legit performances from his actors...for me, this is a pinnacle performance from Leo. Quentin is the only director who can get me excited to watch Dicaprio, instead of my usual state of being annoyed by him. ❤️🎬 Django is very hard to watch, in large part due to Leo's performance...and I've watched it several times. It's almost a perfect film. ❤️🎬
I always hear stock sound effects in movies idk why they always repeat them such as: sqeaky hinges of door, kids laughing identical sound effect in 1000 movies, willhelm screams, ect
Apparently, Christian means Catholic automatically nowdays too. As if Catholics are Christians in the first place, when in fact they are the furthest thing from Christ and Christianity to being with. When your the leaders of your "church" are just a bunch of demonic, idol worshipping, pedophiles, and your "representative of Christ on earth" covers it up, you are in a Godless religion. Oh, and just an FYI, there is only one true representative of Christ on earth, and that is Christ Himself, and ONLY Himself.
I couldnt agree with this episode more, those hobbit movies were so terrible. I read the book when i was a kid and loved it and not one scene in the movies reminded me of the actual book. The moment i saw those dwarves fumbling about in those barrels in the river i was out lol and yeah if it had some of the drama of quentin or any sort of realism i think it would have gone a long way compared to mild dwarf peril.
I'm with Mark Kermode, as soon as Decaprio leaves the scene, the film goes down hill rapidly, it's when Tarantino's self absorbtion grabs the reins from his brilliance. Up to then I thought it was excellent.
Indeed it was. I think all of his films look great. Perhaps I was a little hasty with what I said, I just love those shots of Django and Shultz riding along!
This movie could have been done in 45 minutes..all Christoph Waltz's character had to say was he wanted to buy 5 or 6 slaves, Django's wife being one of them. Roll end credits :/
Only many years late to this, but Leo Dicaprio has done some excellent work in many films. Parts of Gangs of New York were really good. He was elevated by and also elevated The Departed. Also, The Revenant and Once Upon A Time in Hollywood were both excellent. When he returns to his old ways (see Great Gatsby and much of The Wolf of Wall Street, for instance) he fails. When a great director reins him in and drags a good performance out of him, kicking and screaming, he can be great.
loved the film but does anyone feel the climax felt a little off? The gun fight in house felt like the climax but its actually him going back after being sold off to some awful slave labor
I'm really glad these guys liked this movie because I did too and so many times when I watch these reviews they point out something that I didn't think of that is right! I too thought this was extremely funny!!! And Christoph Waltz is genius!!! Thanks RLM!!!
That Tarantino segment where he's talking about digital vs film is so dumb. How is digital any less of an illusion than film? As far as I know digital recordings are also stored frame by frame, yes there may be some compression algorithms used depending on the format which changes that to some degree, but I doubt those are in effect in any significant way in theaters. There are arguments to be made for analog but that's not one of them. In fact how exactly would you display movement if not through a sequence of still images? I am not aware of a method that works fundamentally differently than that.
I thought the same. So, digital is not an illusion? The actors are really, truly present on the theater somehow along with the props and backdrops? It’s still an illusion obviously. Cameras are still used to capture visual information. That information is just stored differently.
