Тёмный

Harrier Jump Jet. The History Of Vertical Take-Off And Landing (VTOL). Things You Might Not Know 

DroneScapes
Подписаться 344 тыс.
Просмотров 26 тыс.
50% 1

The Hawker Siddeley Harrier Jump Jet, the origin of the VTOL Vertical Take-Off and Landing, and things you might not know about it.
The Harrier, informally referred to as the Harrier jump jet, is a family of jet-powered attack aircraft capable of vertical/short takeoff and landing operations (V/STOL). Named after a bird of prey, it was originally developed by British manufacturer Hawker Siddeley in the 1960s. The Harrier emerged as the only truly successful V/STOL design of the many attempted during that era. It was conceived to operate from improvised bases, such as car parks or forest clearings, without requiring large and vulnerable air bases. Later, the design was adapted for use by aircraft carriers.
The Hawker Siddeley Harrier is the first generation version and is also known as the AV-8A or AV-8C Harrier; it was used by multiple air forces, including the Royal Air Force (RAF) and the United States Marine Corps (USMC). The Sea Harrier is a naval strike/air defense fighter derived from the Hawker Siddeley Harrier; it was operated by both the Royal Navy and the Indian Navy. During the 1980s, a second-generation Harrier emerged, manufactured in the United States as the AV-8B and in Britain as the British Aerospace Harrier II respectively. By the start of the 21st century, the majority of the first generation Harriers had been withdrawn, and many operators have chosen to procure the second generation as a replacement. In the long term, several operators have announced their intention to supplement or replace their Harrier fleets with the STOVL variant of the F-35 Lightning II, designated as the F-35B.
A vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) aircraft is one that can take off and land vertically without relying on a runway. This classification can include a variety of types of aircraft including helicopters as well as thrust-vectoring fixed-wing aircraft and other hybrid aircraft with powered rotors such as cyclogyros/cyclocopters and gyrodynes.
Some VTOL aircraft can operate in other modes as well, such as CTOL (conventional take-off & landing), STOL (short take-off & landing), or STOVL (short take-off & vertical landing). Others, such as some helicopters, can only operate as VTOL, due to the aircraft lacking landing gear that can handle taxiing. VTOL is a subset of V/STOL (vertical or short take-off & landing).
Some lighter-than-air aircraft also qualify as VTOL aircraft, as they can hover, takeoff, and land with vertical approach/departure profiles.
Electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft, or eVTOLs, are being developed along with more autonomous flight control technologies and mobility-as-a-service (MaaS) to enable advanced air mobility (AAM), that could include on-demand air taxi services, regional air mobility, freight delivery, and personal air vehicles (PAVs).
Besides the ubiquitous helicopters, there are currently two types of VTOL aircraft in military service: tiltrotor aircraft, such as the Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey, and thrust-vectoring airplanes, such as the Harrier family and new F-35B Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter (JSF). In the civilian sector currently, only helicopters are in general use (some other types of commercial VTOL aircraft have been proposed and are under development as of 2017). Generally speaking, VTOL aircraft capable of STOVL use it wherever possible, since it typically significantly increases takeoff weight, range, or payload compared to pure VTOL.
General characteristics
Crew: 1
Length: 46 ft 10 in (14.27 m)
Wingspan: 25 ft 5 in (7.75 m)
29 ft 8 in (9 m) with ferry tips fitted
Height: 11 ft 11 in (3.63 m)
Wing area: 201.1 sq ft (18.68 m2)
216 sq ft (20 m2) with ferry tips fitted
Aspect ratio: 3.175
4.08 with ferry tips fitted
Airfoil: root: Hawker 10%; tip: Hawker 3.3%
Empty weight: 13,535 lb (6,139 kg)
Max takeoff weight: 25,200 lb (11,431 kg)
Fuel capacity: 5,060 lb (2,295 kg) internal
2× 100 imp gal (120 US gal; 450 L), 790 lb (358 kg) drop tanks for combat
2× 330 imp gal (400 US gal; 1,500 L), 2,608 lb (1,183 kg) drop-tanks for ferry
Powerplant: 1 × Rolls-Royce Pegasus 103 vectored-thrust high-bypass turbofan engine, 21,500 lbf (96 kN) thrust with water injection
Performance
Maximum speed: 635 kn (731 mph, 1,176 km/h) at sea level
Maximum diving speed: Mach 1.3
Combat range: 360 nmi (410 mi, 670 km) ho-lo-hi with 4,400 lb (1,996 kg) payload
200 nmi (230 mi; 370 km) lo-lo with 4,400 lb (1,996 kg) payload
Ferry range: 1,850 nmi (2,130 mi, 3,430 km) with 330 imp gal (400 US gal; 1,500 L) drop-tanks
3,000 nmi (3,500 mi; 5,600 km) with one AAR
Endurance: 1 hour 30 minutes combat air patrol 100 nmi (120 mi; 190 km) from base.
7 hours plus with one AAR
Service ceiling: 51,200 ft (15,600 m)
g limits: +7.8 −4.2
Time to altitude: 40,000 ft (12,192 m) in 2 minutes 23 seconds from a vertical take-off
Take-off run CTOL: 1,000 ft (300 m) at max. TO weight
#harrier #vtol #aircraft

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

3 ноя 2023

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 29   
@Dronescapes
@Dronescapes 6 месяцев назад
Click the link to watch more aircraft, heroes, and their stories, and missions ➤ www.youtube.com/@Dronescapes Join this channel ➤ ru-vid.com/show-UCTTqBgYdkmFogITlPDM0M4Ajoin ➤ IG: instagram.com/dronescapesvideos/ ➤ TWITTER (X): tinyurl.com/m86k2ypf
@billotto602
@billotto602 6 месяцев назад
The Harrier was an engineering masterpiece. I loved watching, them fly.
@mdh1196
@mdh1196 6 месяцев назад
I was fortunate enough to see a Harrier’s flight maneuvers in 1994 or 1995 at the Van Nuys air show. It was awesome 🤩
@davedebang-bang6168
@davedebang-bang6168 5 месяцев назад
This beautiful bird used to come to airborne in Eastbourne every year
@givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935
@givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935 6 месяцев назад
The big fan is used in forward thrust so it has/had high bypass turbofan fuel efficiency. The big cross section limited its speed to transonic only.
@Jack-bs6zb
@Jack-bs6zb 3 месяца назад
The best documentary on the Harrier i’ve seen to date. PS we say “P eleven twentyseven”
@allens9876
@allens9876 3 месяца назад
The English have good engineers. Everything that they make and want it to be the best is the best!
@jaymorris3468
@jaymorris3468 5 месяцев назад
Amazing aircraft
@myronplichota7965
@myronplichota7965 5 месяцев назад
From P.1127 (which I read about as a kid) to AV8B, I've been impressed with 1) 1-engine/4-nozzles design elegance 2) seat-of-the-pants reaction controls at low airspeeds 3) the combat record of airframes in the family tree. If I were a man of means, I'd fly circuits in an unloaded AV8B every day to focus my wandering mind :)
@Then.72
@Then.72 3 месяца назад
British engineers also invented the P.1154 that would have made the Harrier supersonic but the politicians but a budget on it as usual
@rossnolan2883
@rossnolan2883 6 месяцев назад
Legend 🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧🇬🇧
@KILLHACAY
@KILLHACAY 26 дней назад
Wow! Amazing documentary! Ive always liked the harrier jump jet since finding out about it and seeing it back in the day it was was revolutionary air craft technology and for a longtime before its inception seemed science fiction but as with alot of cases becomes science reality i know that the harrier is some what semi retired and has stoped production of which forr reasons im not to sure why i dont know if its due to mordern advancements in a similar vtol aircraft and currently doing research in seeing the current and next generation of the these types of aircraft..
@paulsnickles2420
@paulsnickles2420 6 месяцев назад
Very interesting documentary about the harrier jet
@roberttalarsky4238
@roberttalarsky4238 6 месяцев назад
When I was in the Navy the first Marine jump jet was on the same ship ,USS Gaum
@edutaimentcartoys
@edutaimentcartoys 6 месяцев назад
VTOL ..very useful when on an aircraft carrier
@user-qr1rc9tu5b
@user-qr1rc9tu5b 3 месяца назад
Esse.foi.muinto.bem.feito.engeeiros.mak.11.poder.tirar.o.chapeu..para.voçes.enge...top.
@jonr6680
@jonr6680 5 месяцев назад
Thumbnail reference?
@givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935
@givenfirstnamefamilyfirstn3935 6 месяцев назад
There was a fatal Argentinian ground fire shoot down of a Harrier over the Falklands.
@paulwalker1238
@paulwalker1238 5 месяцев назад
His name was Nick Taylor.
@stephenchappell7512
@stephenchappell7512 3 месяца назад
No air to air losses though
@AA-xo9uw
@AA-xo9uw 3 месяца назад
2 SHARs and 3 GR.3s were lost to ground fire during the Falklands skirmish.
@philippeceline984
@philippeceline984 6 месяцев назад
M'en Fous !
@paulstewart6293
@paulstewart6293 5 месяцев назад
T'es jaloux !
@robert-trading-as-Bob69
@robert-trading-as-Bob69 6 месяцев назад
Thank you for a comprehensive look at the development and deployment of the Harrier. Your American pronunciation of various English words is endearing and humorous. Eg: Royale instead of 'Roil'. Ports Mouth instead of 'Portsmith'. The English love to clip or swallow the ends of their words while Americans like to get the full enjoyment out of every letter. This is NOT a criticism of your delivery, merely an observation of two cultures sharing the same language. Keep true to yourself.
@signorpippistrello
@signorpippistrello 5 месяцев назад
A VTOL version of the Fw 190??? Whaaaaat the hell!? I‘m outta here.
@stephenchappell7512
@stephenchappell7512 3 месяца назад
Although having advantages in takeoff and recovery the Harrier was inferior to conventional carrier aircraft due to its short range as was demonstrated in the Falklands with Harriers only being able to engage and destroy enemy aircraft only after they'd done their damage
@jonr6680
@jonr6680 5 месяцев назад
The fact it was developed before computers... Before fly by wire. Normal flight is balanced between the aerodynamic forces and movement of control surfaces. VTOL has zero surface force at take off, by definition. So totally unstable, purely manual control using the jet outriggers or jet deflectors....and no precedent for training like the pilot said. So control was the real triumph, on top of the power requirements. The absence of safety systems initially, especially at low altitude, meant the test pilots were gods of courage. And each evolution tried different configurations. So there was no standard procedure for experimental aircraft. Even the function of jet engines with no forward speed has risks such as ground debris and reingestion of hot exhaust gases... Not what you want when relying on that engine to avoid plummeting to earth...
@iainriley617
@iainriley617 5 месяцев назад
With the advancement of modern tec exterior coatings wing shaping etc and a heads up cockpit display this would make the F35 look stupid with the right engine even now It should be the UK's equivalent of the A10
Далее
The Super Jet With a Super Problems
15:11
Просмотров 209 тыс.
skibidi toilet multiverse 035
07:50
Просмотров 7 млн
Was this the most advanced Russian jet? - Yak 141
12:19
Hawker Hunter: Britain's Bold Leap
13:42
Просмотров 218 тыс.
Top 10 VTOL Planes Ever made in the World
16:38
Просмотров 1,4 тыс.
Harrier (1988 Documentary)
1:00:35
Просмотров 65 тыс.
How Neuralink Works 🧠
0:28
Просмотров 23 млн