Hawley Grills Nom About Trying To Get Low Sentence For Man Guilty Of 'Revolting' Crimes Against Kids 

You get chills of rage because a lawyer was doing his best to defend his client?

​@@otakurockleewhat in the hell are you talking about...this guy was the prosecutor.

@@dwbradley349 Did you even watch the video? This guy was the public defender for his client. Federico was a public defender for his client Gann. Look it up if you don't believe me. Hawley is asking why this public defender recommended a low sentence for his client. What in the hell are you talking about? Watch the video and actually pay attention this time. 1:42, Hawley says, "I get that you want to defend your client etc." Hawley is being absolutely insane here suggesting that a defense attorney not do his best to defend his client. It undermines the entire justice system.

@@otakurocklee any attorney who protects pedophiles doesn't deserve a spot in government

​​​@@otakurocklee You're not very smart are you?🤨 Even as a defense attorney, a lawyer has a duty to uphold the law and recuse themselves if they believe there is enough evidence stacked against their client and present that info to the judge. It's called INTEGRITY.

It's really hard when one party is ran by hypocrites who purposely stop/destroy all paid for being installed security systems, sued to have Texas remove their water barrier aka security system... All while before they took over they held acting auditions over a total of 1200 'missing' minors over 4 years. Compared to not even 2 years into their time, & they put blackout bans on all press/cameras so citizens have no chance to see it on the only 1 news channel that would show it... Sadly less than half the time for 1200 is current day their in charge with over 85,000 children missing sold into sex slavery... For some reason all actinf auditions on CNN/MSNBC never even started when they took over... Hopefully the people who decade after decade actually stop just knowing litteraly less than zero & the 1 thing they all know is look for the letter D... Maybe if they somehow start to find out the reason where they live only gets worse is because those letter D's who fully run their areas NEVER loose their jobs after getting a F EVERY REPORT CARD... Crazy thought... How about even one time try a different letter. Then MAYBE just MAYBE you would have in the least 1 time something different to compare final report card grades against one another?!?! Crazy idea I know!

💯💯💯👍

I'm not okay with that either. I don't know how anybody could be okay with that. It's the most wicked of all evil.

100% AGREE!🤬

So what are you going to do to help in the fight against it? Our public schools have just become breeding grounds for pedophiles to indoctrinate and sexualize children. When caught, the monsters just claim being misgendered and then cops and lawyers won't touch the case. Parents fighting against this are slowly and steadily losing more and more of their rights (despite what the Daily Wire would have you believe). We stood by for too long thinking it wasn't happening. Maybe some were ignorant, maybe some delusional. We thought it wouldn't affect our community, certainly not our school, right? But it's there; it isn't just online predators, it's in our schools. It isn't just underground traffickers, it's American citizens and politicians.

It's already happening and this is why people Must Vote out the politicians who allow and condone these crimes.

The writing has been on the wall for me , every since they legalized the killing of the unborn. Then in 2008 when they legalized same same, I knew then that there’s one mission left. Rainbow ‘plus’ community!

@@joshuamccabe7729 actually, the group to which you're referring, is the real problem. These people are buried in their phones and completely clueless and brainwashed, as the world sinks into oblivion. You don't seem to be in that group, which is a good thing!

@@thinkinsidetheboxsquarecir3303as they say in baseball, "good eye." You're correct in that all of these infractions are gradual and one bad thing leads to another.

Just look at the republican states with low age requirements for marriage. Even as the defense attorney this nominee requested about ten years for sexual pictures of underage kids... republicans is some states want you to be able to marry those children and actually have sex with them...I presume that's where some of the pictures come from.

I'm going to respond to.this ......there should be no anything for this monster..... except..... being put a a landfill..... period.....

@@chrissaienni5269 what? so you want to get rid of the intrinsic right for everyone to have an attourney? well it was there now, so what do you want from him, to refuse to take the job and have the job forced onto another public attourney?

you're suggesting a lawyer should not do his best in defending his client?

​​@@wasdwasdedsf Having the right to an ATTORNEY, doesn't mean they have a right to evade justice. If a lawyer knew their client was guilty and presented the findings to the judge; it is the attorneys DUTY to recuse themselves from the case upon further analysis. It's called INTEGRITY. It's actually considered illegal to withhold evidence.

@@biggoards2772 You keep suggesting the defender here was hiding evidence. What evidence was the public defender withholding according to you?

what do you mean? this guy was a public defender, was he not? is that not one that is appointed to a person if that person dcant afford a lawyer, because you have an intrinsic right to an attourney? and if so, why are we castigating a lawyer for doing his basic duty?

​@@wasdwasdedsfyou really don't understand? He recommended a sentence BELOW the governments sentence recommendation. A man who is involved in disgusting distribution areas of children, only spending a a handful of years in jail? So they can get out 5 or so years later to likely commit the same crime and worse? You have alot of screws lose. One of the many reasons why I will not bring a child in this disgusting, corrupt and volatile world. You really think its OK to have a child (or any) sexual offender go free after a little time behind bars, only for most of them to do the same acts again. Sick!

@@wasdwasdedsf: ‘WE’ are not castigating the lawyer, Joshua Hawley is doing that. Mr Hawley is a numbskull with a Yale law degree that was apparently bought and paid for since he appears to have little knowledge of the judicial process and the REQUIREMENTS under the US Constitution of an effective defense for all accused persons.

@@rayray8687 i scopypasted we to a whole bunch of comments cause the whole thread is 95% of such comments. so yea we are doing that here apparently

"I don't recall", then goes on to recall all the facts of the case. 😖🤦

Yes, best since Jim Jordan!!

WT about Cruz?

Love both those guys, No BS zone with them.

no this time he just beat up an attorney for not siding against his client because unpopular crime

It was a BS line of questioning, actually. I’m no fan of ANY Biden nominee, but this line of questioning is stupid. It’s a defense attorney’s DUTY to defend their client zealously. All the way to sentencing. I thought Hawley would know that, but apparently not. I wonder how many innocent ppl exonerated by DNA had lawyers that didn’t give their all because they thought their client was guilty. I’m pretty sure it’s more than zero. Apparently Josh never heard the Ben Franklin quote "It is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer".

it wouid change for their case only.

The people who allow these crimes are, also the ones committing them!

Oh something is going to happen it will get worse

Far from it. He's just grandstanding by crapping all over 6th Amendment.

this guy was a public defender, was he not? is that not one that is appointed to a person if that person dcant afford a lawyer, because you have an intrinsic right to an attourney? and if so, why are we castigating a lawyer for doing his basic duty?

@@wasdwasdedsf Hawley and other right wingers think they're picking up votes for going after appointees of the other side. They intentionally ask questions the appointee cannot ethically answer because they know the average voter watching this is ignorant of our justice system and how it's supposed to work. It's unfortunate that this conduct is probably effective to most of the morons who would vote for him.

Just like Abbott and DeSantis and Trump yes 🙌 read Matthew 25:31-46 The Final Judgment all the answers you need are there 🤔 😮😊❤

@@tomcheslock2685 You’re claiming de Santis and Trump are pro-child predators but say nothing about Biden and his ilk? I’m so glad that the Christians I know are moral and upright people! (By the way, I’m not a Christian, so don’t think I’m patting myself on the back here.)

This is an ridiculous and utterly baseless attack on a nominee by Hawley, unless you think no defense attorney should ever work in government. Our criminal justice system is adversarial, it's not just his job, but his constitutional duty to zealously advocate for his client. If we're going to punish defense attorneys for advocating for their clients we might as well just remove the 6th Amendment right to counsel from the Constitution entirely.

​@@tomcheslock2685Wrong

Ole Yeller them is real justice.

Hawley is suggesting that lawyers don't defend their clients and actually help their clients get a longer sentence. That is insane. Hawley is a lunatic.

@@otakurockleeI’m happy to see this comment. This Senator is an absolute tool.

@@otakurocklee Agree 100%. I wish some of these appointees would put a jerk like Hawley in his place. He's voting against them anyway, they have nothing to lose as long as they maintain a calm demeanor.

Absolutely! Children are innocent and an attack on them is, In my opinion, an attack on god and the collective future of our people

Agree

I approve

@@danielmartin7838 Read: {Deuteronomy - Chapter 19}

Again: Deuteronomy - Chapter 19 And, Romans - Chapter 13 One cannot go wrong here.

Applies to 95% of all of America's most dishonest and despicable Professionals, lawyers.

this guy was a public defender, was he not? is that not one that is appointed to a person if that person dcant afford a lawyer, because you have an intrinsic right to an attourney? and if so, why are we castigating a lawyer for doing his basic duty?

this attourney who was doing his job needs to be disbarred from the justice system! quick, get in someone who will do the opposit of what his job is! that dofesnt sound corrupt at all!

Thank you! I'm shocked by the incompetence of a majority of these commenters. It's insane to me that they think a court appointed lawyer should collude with the court rather than represent his client. He could have suggested no time, and my opinion wouldn't change. It's his job to represent his COURT APPOINTED client.

@@trillstina Exactly! If he knew he was capable of convincing the court of a zero-day sentence, and intentionally did not do so... that would be malpractice and an ethics violation. Of course it would be impossible to prove such a thing. But the point is that the lawyer is supposed to get his client the minimum possible sentence by any means short of breaking the law. Hawley is insane.

He's not the prosecutor, I don't understand Hawley. What is this?

It’s got nothing to do with the victim/s at all, EINSTEIN. It’s a defense attorney’s DUTY to defend their client zealously. All the way to sentencing. I wonder how many innocent ppl exonerated by DNA had lawyers that didn’t give their all because they thought their client was guilty. I’m pretty sure it’s more than zero. Apparently your genius as$ never heard the Ben Franklin quote "It is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer".

Regardless of the crime you're charged with your lawyer is duty bound to fight your corner,I don't believe in plea deals either that's just so prosecutors still feel they've won

Is this America or some kind of twilight zone... all you folks are suggesting that the lawyer help jail his client and get the maximum possible sentence... instead of actually defending his client and trying to get his client the minimum possible sentence? You're suggesting a lawyer should not do his job? This is insane. This public defender was just doing his job. Hawley is a nut.

How can a member of congress actually suggest a lawyer not do his best defending his client? Josh Hawley is insane.

Yeah I tend to like when Hawley grills people but this is silliness. As a defense attorney his job was to get his defendant the lowest sentence possible no matter how disgusting he found the offense to be personally. His personal feelings are supposed to go out the window. As gross as it was, he did what he was supposed to do by setting his personal feelings aside.

this guy was a public defender, was he not? is that not one that is appointed to a person if that person dcant afford a lawyer, because you have an intrinsic right to an attourney? and if so, why are we castigating a lawyer for doing his basic duty?

ill wait til you get accused of doing something to children by the state. then i expect you to accept the situation when you get no judical defending and is sentanced to life

Its not showing in South Africa. Is it good?

@@carelbosch5566 It is very disturbing to discover the unspeakable wickedness of some adults to innocent children. I hope you see it at the cinema because the numbers watching are recorded unlike on- line and this message needs to go out to world. Remember, God watches and knows all and ultimately there is accountability and judgement.

this guy was a public defender, was he not? is that not one that is appointed to a person if that person dcant afford a lawyer, because you have an intrinsic right to an attourney? and if so, why are we castigating a lawyer for doing his basic duty?

The Original Position Fallacy is an uber witch, unilateral, unbiased, and also Murphy's most consistent date from his little black book. So, yes, yes they would have.

I disagree. A defense lawyer is required by "ethics" to do the very best job for his client. That's his job. That's the whole point of a our justice system - two sides arguing vigorously for their side. I believe Hawley is way off base here. Yes, the crimes are horrendous but this is like killing the messenger of bad news.

@@terry_willis Hawley is completely insane here. He's basically advocating that lawyers slack off when the guilty verdict is read. A lawyer's job doesn't end at the reading of the verdict. There is still the sentencing phase. There are still appeals. A lawyer is supposed to zealously advocate for his client during all phases of the trial.

@@otakurocklee Yes. I'm curious why/how Hawley got derailed on this one. Very out-of-character for him. He's a good man.

this guy was a public defender, was he not? is that not one that is appointed to a person if that person dcant afford a lawyer, because you have an intrinsic right to an attourney? and if so, why are we castigating a lawyer for doing his basic duty?

@tonylilley6611. He didn’t nail him to the wall. It’s a defense attorney’s DUTY to defend their client zealously. All the way to sentencing. You’d think Hawley would know this. I didn’t think he was stupid like this. I wonder how many innocent ppl exonerated by DNA, or proven bungled cases, had lawyers that didn’t give their all because they thought their client was guilty. I’m pretty sure it’s more than zero considering the alarmingly high number of them. Apparently you, and Josh for that matter, never heard the Ben Franklin quote "It is better 100 guilty Persons should escape than that one innocent Person should suffer".

WRONG! His job as a lawyer is an officer of the court and the ONLY obligation of a lawyer to their client SHOULD be to assure they receive a "FAIR TRIAL". America's most dishonest professionals have turned that concept on it's head to where lawyers feel free to use ANY tactic to get their client OFF.

No. Most reasonable people with a moral compass inherently know that it is indefensible defending this garbage and yet certain individuals willingly do so using underhand, dubious tactics. As the comment above states there is a huge difference between a fair trial and the shameful behaviour of certain defence lawyers.

He was a court appointed attorney, not a privately hired attorney - there is a huge difference! He should be on a side of justice and follow judicially recommended guidelines - private lawyer has no such constrains!

@@Brave2standalone are you trying to tell me that because a person can't afford a private lawyer then he does not get a lawyer that actually fights for him to the best of his ability? Don't get me wrong, I honestly think that his defendant should have gotten a much more Stern punishment because this is completely unacceptable behavior!! But if I was on trial for a crime of some sort, I don't think it's fair or just put anyone put restrictions on my lawyer so that he can't represent me to the best of his ability.

You're a lawyer aren't you...

You’re worried about ethics…but totally bypassed the fact he recommended a pedo a sentence that was 100 months BELOW the minimum recommendation. That’s what you’re missing. It’s disgusting and facilitates child rape. So do comments like this.

@@greenspark101 his job is to defend his client, not to sabotage it. Who he's defending is irrelevant. It's the PROSECUTOR'S job and court to make sure he doesn't get out of jail. It's the LIBERAL courts that EXCEPT a horrible lesser sentence like this. It's the liberals who victimize criminals and criminals victims. If his record as a prosecutor gave this s3x offender this type of deal then he should be held accountable. And ethics DOES matter. You should hope you don't get a lawyer that does what you want this guy to do to his client.

Josh Hawley is a nut. Not just on this but multiple issues.

Josh Hawley is actually suggesting here that a lawyer collude with the court to get his client a longer sentence. He's completely insane.