How Twitter needs to change | Jack Dorsey 

There is nothing wrong with Twitter, it depends on which people you follow

Voice.com

everyone go back to Myspace LOL

I've never had Twitter and I deleted Facebook six months ago, I definitely advocate getting rid of it. I'm much more productive and my outlook towards society has become optimistic.

good point, key word is "change"

Extremely odd... why interrupt his answer to how twitter will prevent twitter from disrupting democratic elections? Giving them the benefit of doubt, maybe they were concerned about bad actors learning too much about the system. He already explained the four pillars of their system. Maybe that was just too much information.

@@OrganicMint87 he was talking about "shared reality" and that is a fundamental divide between groups. Most people don't realize that many of their differences with others rest on this problem, they are focused on something from different perspectives. Take pro-life and pro-choice as an example. Pro-life advocates focus on an unborn baby while pro-choice advocates focus on a woman's agency and autonomy. They don't see the problem through a shared lens, and that is the fundamental problem that prevents agreement.

@@elinope4745 Yeah, I agree with you on the issue that Jack is referring to when he mentions "shared reality". Why do you think this would be a topic that TED cut him off on?

@@OrganicMint87 I don't have an answer for your question. I just wish they wouldn't have cut him off.

Terrible interviewer

They kept interrupting Jack. Vs. Not answering a question

I think he answered the questions. The fact is that the answer is not what the people would like to lissten. He answered that Twitter became biger than they espected, and they are criating resources to fix the problems. But this is complex, take time and money.

It is hostile and aggressive to deny me my right to delete my twitter account. I am being defamed on comments there publically. The bully admits to “winding me up.” It is how abusers play mind games while playing the victim. Please stop this abuse! I no longer want to be on twitter. You are violating my human rights. Forcing me to be on twitter when I do not wish to do so is a violation of my human rights and is causing me extreme emotional distress. I have repeatedly requested to be deleted and am being ignored and stonewalled. It is abusive! What gives you the right? It is sadistic abuse. Jack Dorsey. Studies Hinduism. Thinks he’s spiritual. Abuses power. Delete karlynfinn. Stop harassing me.

He doesn’t know what is abuse and Harrassment. Twitter is sociopathically abusing me and ignoring my requests to delete my account. Delete karlynfinn.

100%

It is worst than cocaíne

Twitter will implode

Amen 🙏🏻❤️😄

No it won’t implode.

I agree with your comment. But it's a free to use platform. If you don't like it, move on and use something else.

@@fuzzzvibe it's good that it's vague. Our idea of 'health' should change over time as we understand human psychology better.

@@pooounderscoreman the problem with that is that they can justify any and every ban they want for the sake of the "health of the conversation". Corporations are not exactly fair and balanced in their judgement so giving them a cop out ban whoever they want is not exactly a great idea.

@@dumelachris That's why I don't use it. These are my outsider criticisms of a flawed corporate philosophy that have actual real-world ideological consequences.

@Thunder Cat That is some top tier projection.

I mean, he built it 13 years ago without knowing what it would become. Now he’s trying to figure out how to save humanity without straight up scuttling twitter.

@@markyfrencho Multiple studies have been done that show that the character limit is what causes nuance and discussion about a topic to be dropped and instead reduce the discussion to a flame war.

@@elinope4745 exactly , Jack took the format of a flamewar from 90's usenet or the egroups/forums of the 00's and made it the default setting he went straight to the bottom and started digging

@@elinope4745 It's most definitely a factor. Unfortunately facebook is just as bad and it's character limit is sky high, it's more space to be filled with pseudoscience, dangerous platitudes, racism etc. at the end of the day. Social media has also turned a lot of people into ego maniacs who've grown addicted to the instant gratification of abusing their notoriety in order to manipulate and ultimately derail important public discourse. This issue is much more concerning to me than terrorists and neo-nazis being "censored" (please) because they're not allowed to Trojan horse their ideologies out in the open.

Welcome to the internet

M Sall same.

These comments are what I imagine Twitter is like.

Read, read, read.....

@thecouchtripper bruh

@thecouchtripper But like... How!?

You’re a great person. I’m sure you know that already, but I wanted to say so in case you think that “everyone” you meet is blind to the fact that the Supreme Court has repeatedly and unanimously reaffirmed that there is no ‘hate speech’ exception to the First Amendment. As long as you’re not inciting immediate violence or breaking the law you are free to say whatever you want... and that is part of what makes the US so great. Thank you for aligning with this ideal. Let us hope that social media companies can follow suit and live up to the responsibilities they have been given.

There’s a difference between being banned from a private website and being attacked with dogs and fire hoses by your own government for advocating for equal rights and trying to equate the two makes you seem disingenuous

@thecouchtripper You do realize the hypocrisy and irony of calling people terrible while simultaneously supporting an agenda that would censor folks of their right to call other people terrible, do you not? Bruh indeed.

I have finished watching this video completely. (我看完這部影片了) I am a Taiwanese who cares about the global affairs. (我是一個關心全球事務的台灣人) And, sadly, most of my fellow Taiwanese don't really care about the world. (但是，很不幸地，我大部分的台灣同胞不那麼在意世界。) Hopefully Taiwan can become increasingly globally-aware and globally-competitive. (希望台灣可以越來越有全球意識與全球競爭力。) God bless Taiwan. (天佑台灣。)

@Rich 91 😆 😆 😆 it's the publicly-traded company he barely owns, thanks for exemplifying the ignorance people of your kind abide in. Contrary to your ignorance being biased violates the 1st amendment since they are platform,, not the publisher. Their antitrust laws that ensure such public companies can be broken for predatory behaviors it has already happened with the petroleum ⛽ industry. It just a matter of time tech giants would be broken down into up to

@@erica8332 you don't really seem to know what you are talking about... Sure, you have a right to say or write what you like and you even have a right to publish it. However that does not mean that twitter doesn't have the right to ban you or silence you on their own platform. That is not a violation of the 1st amendment, they aren't coming to your house and forcing your mouth shut. They are just banning you from their website. And they have all the right to do that if they want. Even if they are publicly traded. If you don't want them to be able to do that, don't invest in them and stop using their platform and hope that it collapses eventually. But don't be so stupid as to think they are not able to control what is said on their platform, because they have a total legal right to do this and it doesn't affect your 1st amendment rights at all.

you don't understand the difference between publisher and platform. Platforms can regulate speech but it has to uphold a uniform and impartial standard only publishers can be biased. In the Joe Rogan podcast journalist Tim pool exposed how horrible and biased Jack Dorsey is, he gave countless examples of Democrats reportedly violating Twitter guide such as threatening 15-year-old boy life, etc. Yet there no action has been taken by Twitter despite the fact US law 🚨 was broken by that tweet. To contrary when conservative journalist used the #learntocode he was banned immediately Such partially in judgment is violation regulations that make twitter platform, since they behave like a publisher they must regulate as publisher i.e they will liable for everything their users publish (already amendments have been formulated to clause thos loophole ). Unfortunately due to covid, this has been put on halt This is why Mark Zuckerberg move to an AI system of regulation to avoid human biases and prevent Facebook from being regulated

@@carl_hansson 😆 😆 twitter stock plummets as Trump signs the executive order I spoke of earlier. Tyrants and commissars can no longer impose their dongas on others

More rage, more views/shares. It’s horrifying

What we really need is a Rage “against” the Machine machine. Not like this Pretty Hate Machine we have right now.

Dumpsta fiyer

It's called free speech. You'll never hear the truth watching Fox News or CNN. With Twitter, you get instant access to what's really going on.

That;s pretty much what all social media are about.

Andrew McDonough it’s what tech ceos do best!

Matthew Souza and people who know they are wrong

Andrew McDonough 💯

Rogans up!

Have you guys ever smoked dmt?

- Don’t worry, soon you’ll get your [censorship] done, I know you cannot wait, have patience, - continued Jack.

More like Tyrion is a snack sized Jack

He even acts like a season 7 & 8 tyrion too lol

@@Invenitive Why are you trying to ruin Tyrion?

Maybe a discount Tyrion but has a Lannister kind of money

@@jimdandytheboss D&D did that already haha

This man has an audience

@Charlie Gonzalez whack

They're not removing calls for violence though. They only remove certain perspectives. Especially the Christian one. One of the reasons nobody knows or cares about the global genocide of Christian's.

Haha who would have imagined one day they would censor the president.

it's the shoes that caught my attention lol what are they?

Beanie is the disguise to hide brain slugs. Jack got one from tim on jre

I think smithereens represented all social media.

Louis Cotteta was about Facebook & they lifted directly from the video they did

SuperAtheist agreed. But billy baur seemed a lot like dorsey with his strong spiritual beliefs

Well yeah, they said it was sir.

Yeah it definitely is, considering Jack Dorsey also did a silent retreat recently

Satoshi Hashizume Ditto Facebook. Things have only gotten better since I dropped them both.

Kurt Anderson I couldn’t agree more, although I occasionally use Facebook only to keep in touch with close friends of mine who are based abroad. Social media don’t brighten up my days but the people around me in real life do.

Great idea! We just have to re-programme human behaviours that have evolved over millions of years! Genius!

"Unknowledgeable" 😂😂 Self-own, right there

Daniel Crafter what’s your point?

Daniel Crafter you do know that is a word, right ? Or am I missing something

Ryan Bernadett “unbearably entitled & unknowledgeable”??? What do you possibly know about the hosts???

This is the work! mate, thanks

Jack is a fascist

TED won't bite the hand that feeds it.

What you see on the internet is not "the right way." It's artificially negative due to people's disconnection from each other which enhances the viciousness of what they say since they are not only anonymous themselves, but feel like their words won't be heard by the target.

@@EGarrett01 That enhanced viciousness is what is really in the back of people's minds. Few people will ever speak out in person. This kind of medium is necessary. No need to block or sensor it.

@@katjerouac I'm not necessarily advocating blocking or censoring it, but try becoming the target of people's hate online for something you did, see how it effects you, you'll realize that it's not something your mind is built to handle.

Same.

It's just for publicity and the interest of the shareholders, idiot.

He's one of the best CEOs in Silicon Valley in terms of communication with the users.

unfortunately dorsey has no control over twitter. Thats all in the hands of the US gov.

Yes atleast a 2-5 min edit window.

Edit Button ? Delete Your Tweet than Recreate with Correct Words.

The issue is that Twitter, Facebook and RU-vid can't be held liable...can't be sued for content. These three actually got this protection from congress. Now, they have decided to censor based on ideological positions, along with so called harassment. Now that they are not maintaining a neutral position, they should no longer have this civil liability exemption, which is worth billions of dollars. To wrap your head around this, AT&T provides a long distance service, should they be held liable for any conversation on their platform; reasonably, no, because they don't police the conversation. Now that RU-vid, Twitter and Facebook have decided to be the corporate moral arbitrators, they are no longer offering a neutral service and yes, they are abusing censorship powers. I do not want to see corporate shills dictating what is moral or not. If a law is broken by a poster on these platforms, let the police track them down, and prosecute them. Blocking or removing content that is illegal is the same as tampering with evidence. If the legal authority ask to block the content because it is the subject of an investigation, then fine. The best defense to bad ideas are better ideas, not censorship. Edit: I believe Google was also include in that legislation.

You can't just do that, you know. You need some amount of moderation to stop spam, fake news (Real slander and libel, not trump 'fake news'), etc.

@@jasonz8635 or people can do their own due diligence by blocking spammers and researching/proving the "news".

@@zozouzid everyone has a right--no, a responsibility to defend themselves... And their families. The most effective way to stop trolling will always be, "turn the computer/phone/app off." This nanny-state mentality is going to kill Western Civilization. My baby sister would make bullies cry themselves to sleep. After being burglarized, she bought a gun and got a concealed carry license. You best protect your children by training them to cope and respond to this dark world. It hurts, but it's necessary.

@@libertytreerevo Are you telling me that most 'normies' would research the news before retweeting? Ha, that's exactly why these news articles spread, some people just retweet the tweets. EX: Trump.... Also blocking spammers? Yes that's possible, but bot nets are a thing and some of these spammers are also fake new tweeters.

@@libertytreerevo Yes that's possible, but are you telling me that the kids who attempt suicide due to bullying or cyber-bullying can and should just ignore the mean comments? That is just a negative feedback loop. And you are essentially abandoning these kids to 'toughen up' and stop being a brat. That's not how humans work, you might want to be 100% rational, but we're not by any means, that rational when it comes to emotions.

Done

The ones with hentai avatars

Twitter cannot be what Jack wants it to be because of what it already is. You cannot monitor and suppress those you deem to be inappropriately manipulating the conversation without simultaneously manipulating the conversation yourself. By curating the content, you are shaping the conversation. It is no longer an "open" conversation.

I fear this too however if they execute the ideas and the 4 signals of a healthy conversation specifically, it should all be good. He specifically stated it won't ban wildly wrong theories like flat earth or antivax, and it appears to me they won't even really touch minor forms of bigotry as long as they keep it within their own closed off community, meaning they won't act hatefully towards any individual. Thinking this will be as much of a utopia as he makes it out to be is probably a little naive however, but quite honestly with the amount of hate going on in its current state, it can't get much worse

@@oxey_ 1 year on, and it appears to me that you give him too much credit. Let's just call it for what it is, a seething cesspool of degeneracy, cancel culture and outrage, curated by an ultra left, duplicitous, shitbag.

Link?

@@SiddharthKulkarniN Search bar?

Yup

Broke wind.

Tell me what you want to hear him say.

It is like talking to a brick wall, essentially. He is so engrossed in his own thinking and tunnel non-vision that he can't see beyond his own nose ring.

Anime and Mgs too

😁

How dare you mock green women?

To be fair, she said black women to emphasize them as the topic of her question, because lately the term "people of color" has become very broad to mean everyone not white. When grouping all of those races together they have little similarities other than just "not being white."

Right out of the gate, she gets tribal, as if harassment and doxxing isn't a problem for *everyone*

James Burgess yeah because we live in white countries. We are only a small portion of world population.

@@jamesburgess2k To be fair, that is racist against white people.

If you keep offending people, time to introspect?

@@SiddharthKulkarniN no

@@NJoint this reply says it all

@@Shna_na let me rephrase: when the snowflake culture gets offended by people stating facts and instead of using the tools at their disposal (mute, block) demand the rest of the universe to change how they think and act to cater for their very narrow point of view, while calling everyone else a fascist. No, the introspection time passed.

Вы так считаете? Не самое худшее обвинение в адрес мужчины который , по моему субъективному и не ценному для него видению, является очень внимательным слушателем. Это мне сложно молчать).

​@@mitenka222Джек охуенен. Факт.

Your not alone

It’s simply used for political gain! Even stevie wonder can see it

How

They aren't posting any comments from conservative sides. It's all fake

He just wants to get it over with so he can get back to his Savile-esque antics on the dark web

Doesn't make sense since MAPs/pee dohs are allowed to stay on twitter and communicate together, but women asking certain questions have been getting banned for life from twitter. Jack Dorsey also looks like he spends days and nights at a time in certain auctions on the dark web. Coincidence?

I use twitter..i really thought it was crapp but choosing selected Twitter accounts helps you

Lol

Maybe to see trumps tweets

No, but I hear about it ALL THE TIME!

he's have given 1billion to charity, btw

@@lena.dymytrenko that’s right

lol here's your W

Spencer Arnot The First Amendment applies only to government actions. Neither you nor anyone else has the right to decide whether a private person or entity is complying with a particular view of what constitutes free speech. The Supreme Court has held that private entities can act on the basis of their First Amendment rights (in the context of freedom of religion). If you don’t agree with Twitter’s decisions about what speech is consistent with their business model and ethical principles, you have the freedom to choose not to use it.

Ned Dodds I’m aware of the law. I’m also aware that the law can be changed if new circumstances warrant it. Given the size and level of influence these social media companies have I believe there is sufficient justification to revisit this topic. I suspect it will happen soon.

How long before we realize that "Healthy Conversation" means whatever "they" deem acceptable and correct.

@@cla99009 a lot of people already do. Particularly those on the right who've fallen victim or follow people who've become victims of these practices. The main problem is that there's a lot of people on the left, the illiberal part of the left, who are perfectly fine with totalitarian methods as long as they feel that's it's on their side.

@@nicobruin8618 Appeasement just means you get eaten last.

LOOOOOOL

Cillver Bullet they do it on the down loo

For at least the last 4 years sadly....

she's barely black lol. can't believe she said 'safe space' unironically.

Because she hates white women and wants to specifically exclude them. She is a racist.

No I mean separating them like black women dont fall under the women of color category.

Yes, tweets not being available could be the end of the platform. Nobody is using Facebook for sure.

@@NicholasLittlejohn well Twitter is made of tweets if people can't read them then there is no point I was talking mor about not fixing bugs

And that's right, in my humble opinion.

That's exactly what I was thinking. I don't need social media to interject in healthy conversations. But when it becomes threatening, and or stalking. In general harassment. Then that IP address should be registered and blocked to prevent them from creating future accounts. There is a personal accountability and responsibility to these platforms for the users. And it's really very simple just hold people accountable for their conduct. Healthy debates and conversations can happen over social media based upon the users who are behind the keyboard. And all social media platforms should be required to interject and respond to fake accounts. And they have the capability of doing so and removing them from the platform.