'I'd Love For You To Explain What This Means': JD Vance Presses FAA Nominee Over 'Equity' Agenda 

This is what I have seen more and morein the public school I work in.

@@megg.6651 4:59

"The new black conservatives assume that without affirmative action programs, white Americans will make choices on merit rather than on race. Yet they have adduced absolutely no evidence for this: Hence, they are either politically naïve or simply unconcerned about black mobility. Most Americans realize that job-hiring choices are made both on reasons of merit and on personal grounds. And it is this personal dimension that is often influenced by racist perceptions." (Unmasking The Black Conservatives) -Cornel West

@@nickcrayne854 what racist? Show me one

That comment could apply to everyone in the United States

Aye: Equity=Discrimination.

It sure is.

Read “behind the green mask” to see who’s behind this and to stand up to the tyrants

They're ok with discrimination if it means beating the white supremacist patriarchy and elevating those considered to be at the bottom so those at the "top" (white people as a group, those who are qualified) can be kicked off a cliff.

Equity is Violence. Someone has to be the kulaks (sic) ☠️

its not about lowering standards its about realizing individuals like a math student might need additional resources like after class tutoring to reach that standard I swear for people who read and watch Forbes y'all sure are dumb.

Faxxxx doing so could end up showing a difference is in ability between ethnicities . This would create a bigger race gap. Good idea 👍

Cause lowering the testing expectations lowers the required capability of the student, reduced required capability can and will kill people in a myriad of ways depending on their profession. The lowered expectations on black students in medical fields has killed people and ruined the careers of otherwise rather capable people. Do you want to intentionally set up minorities to be killing people with their incompetence because they weren't tested hard enough?

@@andrewgreeb916 "The lowered expectations on black students in medical fields has killed people and ruined the careers of otherwise rather capable people." If you can provide data on that bullshit you just spouted that would be great

Exactly why Karl Marx said socialism would not work in reality! Most socialists never read enough of his comments.

Equity=Institutionalized Discrimination ... literally, meritless!

Discrimination against white men

bingo

Equity literally means 'Equality of Outcome'. When pushed in a social context it has ALWAYS lead to mass murder and genocide. The push for Equity is also the reason for the trans indoctrination of our children.

So.... hatred against whites? Gotcha.

oh crap ,dont say that ,the liberal left karens will come unstuck !!

Good ol white folks did get a free ride huh smh crazy

💯👈🏻

Equality=Equal Opportunity; based on merit; Equity=Discrimination, based on mandated equal outcomes.

People who accuse other people of being racist, but they’re actually racist themselves. That’s exactly what we’re dealing with and it’s insane .

I respect you. That is what America was built on. People making the dream come true, not expecting everything to be handed to them.

Equity is a euphemism for discrimination: Equity=Discrimination.

That is a very inspiring story!

So you don't bully smart kids and pad pretty girls grades I'm sure

​@@yyyuiu5773 I'm sure he's not a s...-eating troll either.

I care. I don't want any affirmative action people in charge of my life.

Who even sees in the cockpit?

@doc savage Can we still use that word? 😂

Never seen a pilot or co pilot don't know if white black brown or a woman I know that I got to where I was going

The only ones who care what color the pilot is are racists. Golly gee, I wonder who keeps making a big deal out of that?

Equity programs have been around for decades and there is an overwhelming body of evidence that they do not reduce the quality of work done.

Not like it is now. Wasn't done in the airline industry, or the medical industry. Relaxing standards makes everyone, including you, less safe.

Let’s think about you are saying together, because clearly you didn’t think before you hit ‘enter’. Presumably, the surgeon holding the scalpel should’ve been trained on any and every aspect of the surgery that they’re about to perform BEFORE they grabbed the scalpel, correct? Maybe the barrier of entry into the programs (in this case medical school) is relaxed a little bit, but they’re still going to have to do the course work, residencies, and practice before they become a doctor, correct? Same goes with the other jobs you mentioned, no? Not to mention that there are numerous stories about doctors who don’t look like their patients, literally ignoring, or not taking symptoms seriously (quick Google search of “Black women in labor, symptoms ignored” shows how common that example actually is). If you’re that opposed to preferential treatment based on race, you’re literally centuries too late. This isn’t about that, as much as it’s about righting wrongs of the past, that have generational consequences.

@@tinaarko6625 How was it done before? And how was it done now?

@@derekchance3700 Yes, but they had to significantly lower the bar to get that result.

Big facts, if you need something done well it helps to know whose 'winning' in that industry and work with them

How long till that plane crashes?

​@@svenolsen8184 If you hire based on competence instead of ethnicity it may never.

Will it extend to maintenance crews? Or is it just a dude with lipstick handing out peanuts?

@@purplemonkey649 good one!

Isnt it obvious b y now? When the black guy said "we want the future to look less like the people in this room" when he was referring to a room of majority white politicans in a majority white country, he was saying "we want to the future to be less white in this country". That's genocide talk. its like going to zimbabwe with a bunch of white people and saying "we want the future here to be less black". Wake up.

And.... effort :)

yes, that will be the evolutionary outcome of equity. It doesn't matter, if we all fall behind former standards, we all will be saved by equity departments. The dumbing down of humanity.

Free lobotomies for smart people!!! 🤣

which is why the left is so focused on equity

The unequal boxes are that belief system's version of an IQ TEST.

An equity hire air traffic controller will have a much better chance of killing hundreds of people with just one mistake.

Agree...hire the person that is more qualified for the job

JD Vance went too easy on this clown. He should have asked him if he demands a diversity hire surgeon or the "best" surgeon when his kid goes under the knife.

Stop being racist and accept the fact that blacks are inferior and need extra support just to barely function in a society they offer nothing to but crime, destruction, constant strife and an awful culture.

​@@stanleyclark923always the example I use along with a person's family being on a plane with a pilot

I really miss Uncle Milton.

They are not even talking about equality. Equality is equality of opportunity, equity is equality of outcome.

Yeah and his economic measures that led to further monopolization, austerity, wealth disparity, and Alan greenspan...cute quote tho

It's heart breaking how little we learned from that man.

@@adenizenabroad9593 what exactly do you think is wrong with wealth disparity? Any attempt to correct this would equate to redistribution which only serves to disincentivise innovation and entrepanureship

Consider this - if the pass mark is 70%, and everyone gets 80-100%, that means getting an 80% would make you the bottom of your class - but still very good. So that's where this idea falters. What you really need is a strong minimum standard to enter those fields.

same go for plumer.s and electriction and teacher i never learn to spell in school i was given a d are c and passed to the next grade

Yeah let's just fire everyone except the 10% who are great at things what can go wrong.

The guy that got D's in med school is still called doctor.....

so true and that is why communism will never work... why put in effort to become the slave to the lazy through 'redistribution'...

As can be seen in some countries politician's ie. SK,SA,Zim ect.

Explain exactly how giving disadvantaged minorities opportunities, "forcefully" "brings some down". For who and how does this happen exactly?

Yes, the fellow on the top of the hill has a shackle and chain around his ankle. It's a variation on the theme of racism. Now we are in new era where government institutionalized racism/discrimination is celebrated. I am honestly stunned that the folks who CLAIM to be against slavery and racism are actually FOR it. It's just a matter of who is empowered to exercise the power over others.

@@bulwerboys6011 That’s not what we are talking about. The chart is not expressing equal opportunities that’s not the point of the chart. And lowering standards only makes the travel more dangerous. People already have equal opportunity. Life may simply not flow in such a way as to wash someone into completion of a goal. If you want to be an airplane pilot put in a lot of work and effort. Some people have to put in more than others because of intelligence or because of life circumstances. It’s not society’s fault that someone was born without any hands or feet. A blind person cannot operate a printing press. Life is unfair. The more that people understand life isn’t fair the more it will seem fair because they will know what to expect what they can do realistically in their lives.

That's why the race hustlers will IGNORE YOU.

I worked for FedEx 35 years and seen it many many times. V.P. told us if you know any female A&P she has a job. It looks better on federal contracts to have females ETC.

Racism exists, and it's colorblind, as far as who the actual racists are. But it's like saying we have a murder epidemic because a very small portion of the population like to kill people.

There is a push for more Black females to pilot airliners. Are you aware of this? Cause it's exactly what JD Vance is talking about.

Well said. Saying equity doesn’t exist is crazy. America is capitalism. The only color that matters is green. Do y fall for this Us bs Them mentality. Especially when so many examples show otherwise. Look at our Supreme Court, White House. Maybe in corporate culture there are not many minorities at the top, but you don’t just give someone a position because of their race. If it’s your company you put the strongest at the top. Because they are there to make you green. People in current generations are lost. No one’s against st you except those yelling that they are on YOUR SIDE. Just be the best you can be. Times will get hard and there can be ugly people out here but let’s not make those types give is the impression everyone in that race is like that. We all are basically the same. Sht sitting down and hate paying taxes. Let’s build our way up from that commonality :)

but i wanna oprate on deeze branes and i has a naif alredy!

PREACH!!!!!

​@@bigredracingteam9642 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣

@BigRedRacingteam - let me know when you get the scalpel.. I'll be your anasneeziologist. Achooo

How about the lift JD got to get into Law school?

Well that can’t possibly be true, they discriminate more against Asians.. or are you saying you didnt make the bar set by Asian women?😂

@@TheFi1thyCasual 🤡🤡

Happened to me but for Firefighter in 1982 and was told "You're one of the most qualified applicants but, you're a white male and I can't hire you". That's when I became a Republican.

it's not even "affirmative action"...it's discrimination based on race and gender

Too bad. Dems are in charge now. Deal with it.

it means everyone is treated like crap except the thieves on top.

At my grade school, we have the poster on equality and equity that is much better depicted. One half of the poster has three boys (or girls) of three different heights standing on a level grass ground facing a wooden fence and beyond the fence is a baseball game. The taller boy can easily see over the fence. The middle boy has to stand on his toes and is straining over the fence to see. The third boy is also standing on his toes, but no matter what he does, he is way too short to see the game beyond the fence. On the other side of the poster is the same three boys, but this time the middle boy and the short boy are standing on boxes of two different sizes where they are large enough for the two to easily over the fence. No one is bringing anyone down. Not one boy is negatively affected by the others. ALL can see the game comfortably. Why is that a problem? Are you against the fact that two boys needed help to see the game?

@@kbpeters4246 Because that's a cartoon and only one way to draw it. It is depicted as if there is no cost to the "equity", but there always is. You perhaps have seen the other one, where the short boy is standing, the middle sized boy has his feet cut off and the tall boy has his legs cut off at the knee. They are all the same height and have achieved equity.

@@DragNetJoe Oh Lordy, dude, life lesson can be easily depicted in allegories, aphorism, parables, proverbs, cartoons (used for decades), historical artworks, Bible verses, etc. Why would anyone cut off anyone's feet or legs when there are far better methods to create equity. What you have proved is there are horrible ways and far better ways to create equity. Our job is to find a better way and not to rely on negative harmful methods.

​@@kbpeters4246 you should really speak to someone who has lived in soviet russia, or Cuba, or Venezuela, or Russia. This equity idea you are trying so hard to promote in your well intentioned ignorance has already caused the deaths of over 100 million people over the last century. The hard truth is that beyond the intrinsic value of human life, we are not equally valuable. The scientists who discovered the cure to polio brought more value to society and humanity at large than the guy who bags your gorceries at your corner store. So why on earth would we live in a society where they are rewarded equally? In what world do people continue to strive for more if they are treated equally to the people who strive for nothing? This is and always has been the problem with this argument which is the core problem with communism and which is why modern communist countries have adopted forms of capitalism (which has created inequality) in order to survive. Equal outcome in inherently against human nature. When China's revolution promised that everyone would have food, they didnt mention that 40million people would have to starve to death for people to have their "equal share". Please talk to people who have left these countries for America and ask them the question about equal opportunity vs equal outcome.

I think that more than 1 in every 1000 people care about those things.

@@trwent I certainly do. I refuse to trust my life with affirmative action appointees. That's what they are.

@Chris Sandys Even IF affirmative action is taking place, it does NOT automatically follow that every minority hired for the job is there BECAUSE OF affirmative action. What you (apparently) object to is affirmative action hires, NOT the actual race of the employees per se.

People wonder why our educational systems are a joke that is why. When schools don’t teach their kids or offer them ways to challenge themselves we systematically become stupid

As someone who took and passed AP American History and Cobcurrant Spanish, both helped me save money when it came to paying for college credit. To eliminate thosr classes would hurt kids who financially struggle bit who want a college education. I basically paid my own way through college; in fact my dad was actually OPPOSED to any of us kids going to college. One sister took out loans (still owes on those), another sister served in the Army, & I just worked abd did school kinda slowky. But that AP History class saved me from having to take 2 college classes, which saved me hundreds if dollars, so I could move on. I never looked down on those who didn't take the class or the test, & I doubt those who didn't even cared abt AP History, so who does it hurt? The hurt is only in removing advancef classes, not in the offering of them. Sorry if any typos, I'm riding in a moving vehicle.

The government is dumbing down the public schools to keep the mindless drones while the rich will send their children to private schools. You know how it goes keep the rich, rich and the poor poor.

The Senator is full of bs. For one thing the minimum standards are not being breached. The equality/equity chart is bs. The orange color is under dispute and the whole purpose of of the govt intervention in systemic racism is to even out the brown color...which is clearly not to scale. Let's put it another way. In medical terms, can you imagine if hospitals never let residents practice medicine? Because the attendees are the best of the best right? Who cares about their replacements? Every investment requires a sacrifice in the present. To say that the best pool of pilots are white males is bs. The best way to grow the pilot pool is to grow the pool of applicants. The best way to do that is by example...which is diversity hiring. Many diverse would be pilot students wouldn't think that pilot is in the list of eligible careers because they doen't see people like them in that career. That is a very powerful motive. Can you see yourself or your kids as a pro basketball player? Didn't think so. Some fixing needed there too in the reverse direction. Referring to the charts again, the disparity of the brown heights make the required talented and/or grit (orange color) unnecessarily large to overcome the brown advantage.

I wish your last sentence was worded more carefully. It seems almost opposite your valid point vis-à-vis the sentences prior.

You're a racist and you're wrong

Haven't you heard of Socialism? It AlWaYs WoRkS. 🤥

💯👈🏻

Kamala Harris and Pete Butigeg! Oh wait, I just proved you right….

STILL NOT AT ALL QUALIFIED TO RUN THE FAA!!

"SEEMS" !!!!!! Guess you don't mind getting on an airplane with a captain that was at the bottom of his class just because he "SEEMS" qualified.

Now what is more important? Picking pilots by their skin color or sex with minimal qualifications. Or losing a few hundred lives as collateral damage for the greater good of diversity, inclusion or equity?

That is not an unintended consequence. That is the intended outcome. They mean to do harm.

Or the pilots’ ekg results being loosened to allow them to keep flying, even though they would have failed prior to a certain thing we can’t talk about because P doesn’t like sunlight on their juice.

@@dakotafred1829 If Kamala was a pilot, the pilot seat would have knee rests....

Or when trains start jumping rails? I can think of a lot of places where equity without equality of skill and intelligence could lead to disaster.

FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS FULL OF THESE PEOPLE AND THEY KNOW YOU CANT TOUCH THEM !!!!

That's been happening for years. The competent people always have to take up the slack of the incompetent ones hired based on factors other than their skills.

Why did white people NEED the law to allow them to fire someone solely because of their race? Let’s turn this around and hear you justify why you deserved better? Maybe get an 8th grade education- stop whining like a victim and just admit it- your parent grandparents great grandparents none could be fired because they were white. Yet just 60 years ago- so parents, grandparents, everyone related going back to 1776. Why as of 1963 did white fat arses need the law they could fire by race? Is that racist? Are you racist or you wish to condemn the law a mere 1 generation ago- and admit you are better off BECAUSE YOU ARE WHITE

@@troystewart7730 Lies, lies, lies. My father was fired from 3 jobs, and my mother from 2. The companies could give 2 chits what color they were. You believe in lies, you think like a dummy.

Bull$1t. Aviation is merit-based and those not making the grade are soon mustered out. Those who complain the most are the ones who blame others for their own shortcomings.

I was passed over for a key maintenance position for a major airline, back in 1978 because of affirmative action. When I was told, they asked if I would train the person who was awarded that job ! On the spot, I told them to k*ss mya$$, resigned and lived happily ever after. History will repeat itself.

I failed my first checkride for a PPC because I got super stressed and make a mistake. I went back and retook it and the DPE said he couldn't have flown better than me. A few mistakes doesn't define someone's career. Edit: I was going to recount the whole checkride to go through it step by step, but then realized this is a youtube comment section and no-one cares. I should mention my claim above isn't entirely true since he said I was in ACS standards for my recovery from unusual attitudes but he wasn't too happy about them. I don't mind this at all though since my organization didn't cover recovery from unusual attitudes in my training for a huge time period between when I was trying to get an open time slot from the DPE and retake the checkride. Now I know to make sure I'm always keeping that stuff in mind for myself, plus I'm super happy I was still within ACS standards anyway.

You strawman dumb-dumbs... They're not going to hire unqualified candidates. In fact, the recruiters won't even push unqualified candidates into the hiring manager's candidate pool

As a passenger I very much agree.

As a certificated mechanic I second this.

There have been tests and surveys on American college campuses doing exactly that, proving "smart people" they are in fact dumb. They all support "equity" and all the other buzz words as long as "someone" (not them ofc) is paying for it. The moment and I mean the very moment that student is asked to pay for the costs of someone elses equity they extricate themselves from their previous statements quick smart, without actually changing their stance as they are hypocritically impaired.

I guess your statement is a self confession?

What he means is Biden has flooded your system with misfits people who have sold their souls, what will they think when they are found out. 😂😂😂😂 🇦🇺

​@@sickofallthecryingbabiesno I think he's talking about you

Or convince the smart people that the dumb people are smart.

I was thinking the same thing. When I see these type of illustrations, I feel like there is something missing from the "Equality" side of it; No one is forcing the "disadvantaged" short person to stay on that box, he could do the extra effort and go find another box or two and raise himself higher than the others...

In fact, the guy working hard on the left will be punished for doing better by being taxed more etc.

I am fine with supporting people that cannot rise of reasons out of their control. As such no one should suffer a destitute life due to severe disabilities. As long as they do as much as they can. Such help will not build wealth but it should be enough to live a life of dignity. I have no tolerance for people that try to milk such a system thou something that, sadly, do happen far too often.

Ameba? Really?

and this is how every governmental agency is run , thats why there always a disaster. They consistently promote people to keep there diversity and inclusion numbers in order

Same thing they do at the post office

Thats racist.

Damn damn

They did that here in the UK about 20 years in most government offices. Inept personal were never fired but simply moved, many to their own department. Departments HAVE to have a leader so they were promoted to department heads, with a total employee count of 1. These people have now shuffled sideways to running actual departments and no-one seems to know why goverment offices are so badly run. Jeez, I wonder why

I think the dude answered honestly, he just hasent thought his policies trhough. This happens.

Yep, and it’s a stall tactic

That's what they say to give them time to frame the lie 🤥

That's a common opening statement predicting answer avoidance. It prevails in questioning progressives.

It’s too late in the ball game to not fully understand a policy

If that's true, then it even makes the Republican side, complicit, because people like Mr. Vance, here, or someone like Jim Jordan, Rand Paul, or John Kennedy, very intelligent fellas, should have figured out what you have, and brought it to bear. Maybe they have, and it's being stymied. Idk. Not discounting you, in the slightest, but this issue should have been brought to bear, by now. Unless, like I said, our "right"-side of Government, is either complicit....or stymied.

“Not discriminating against me is discrimination!” America needs to completely start over because this nonsense is everywhere

@@pamtnman1515Well if your not discriminated upon, how will you learn? That’s how I’ve improved and gotten ahead of everyone else… So yes “not discriminating is discrimination”.

@@pamtnman1515 100%. I have noticed the change in society for over the past 20 years... Not only because of diversity and inclusion, but also because of the failure of our education system and bad parenting. We as a nation are becoming less and less proficient in the basic skills needed to survive and provide for ourselves. Everything from fast food workers and teachers, to corporate VPs, doctors, and politicians, I have seen a significant increase in incompetence in every aspect of my life. Our country isn't just filled with nonsense, it is filled with decaying intelligence, decaying morals, and decaying ethics. People are less capable today of doing the basic jobs they have done for decades, EVEN THOUGH we have access to more information and easy training more so than any other time period. It makes absolutely no sense that this is the case unless the reason for it is oversaturation of information and coddling of lazy or weak-minded people. If you give people food for free, why would they ever bother to work for it? If you can work at a job with no fear of being fired, why would you ever improve yourself? If you are comfortable in your life and have no urgent needs, why would you ever strive for more?

@@sentinel8185 if what you just wrote here makes sense to you, then carry on. I’ve read it several times and not been able to make sense of it. Mr Washington argues in this video that my colorblind approach to life is actually discriminatory. No, it’s not. It’s the essence of not discriminating. This fake victim garbage is responsible for setting back race relations several decades. A lot of good work getting people to not judge one another by skin appearance is going out the window by the same people who insist we shouldn’t discriminate, but who do very much discriminate. A lot of good people are real tired of it and you are losing your audience

Are you white?? As if I didn't already know .

​@Walter Pierce you sound like the racist. Joanne does not.

@@walterpierce6061 that would only matter to a racist ie : one who judges by skin color and not character

@@ivanbluetarski9071 BS. I know a racist when I see one Now I see two of you here. Probably a lot more. Don't lecture me about anything. You probably voted for Trump. Racist

​@@walterpierce6061 Why would race have anything to do with it? Do you not believe a person should be hired because they are the most qualified, best applicant for the job? Or do you believe we should start hiring people for solely their skin color?

Agreed, inheritance should be banned and all children should be raised in communes.

Well the issue is with humans. It is extremely hard to point to something in the immediacy and say "that is wrong we need to take action to fix it now". But instead, we see the results and think "is there something that caused these differing results?" It would be like if you were a teacher and you gave a test with the answers written on the board. You noticed that everyone in the first 2 rows got every question correct. Most people in the middle rows got most questions correct, and only a few people in the back row got every question correct. Initially it seems as if everyone had the same opportunity. But once the results come back you then start to think "why is this result the way it is?" And the you ask "how can we make it better". There is always extraneous variables (in my example some of the student may not understand that those were the answers. Some may not care. Some may not be able to read etc), but to ignore the results and chaulk it up to "well the kids that failed just didn't apply themselves, or care enough" is disingenuous.

It also seems they are not looking to explain who is given that bigger box and based on what. Who decides who gets what box? The person that studies and/or works their arse off may be seen as having an advantage and given a smaller box, while lazy may be considered disadvantaged and given a bigger box. Or they try to give preference based on gender or skin colour? In that case we already know who gets a smaller box, even though they may have similar backgrounds, life, skills and motivation.

My take has always been, you give everyone the same box, but you leave it up to the charity of the individual to determine whether or not they need the box in the first place, and if they should give it to someone else. The problem is that unlike the height discrepancy analogy they love to use, you can't inherently see the disadvantages someone has in life, and to determine it from an outside perspective where you pick and choose which demographic needs more help than others is inherently flawed. Take race for instance. You can look at two individuals (one white, one black) and claim the black person needs more help in life than the white person. The flaw in this is that you ignore the fact that that white person grew up in an impoverished household in the middle of West Virginia while the black person grew up in a rich suburb of Washington DC. If anything, that poor man from West Virginia needs more help than the rich man from DC. Take wealth. Someone you may consider poor may actually not need money from a wealthier guy because maybe they live in an area that is cheap and doesn't require a lot of money to live off of or he simply doesn't care for money. Meanwhile, the wealthier guy may be living in an expensive city where he needs every nickel and dime to even afford rent and travel to his job. It would be wrong to steal money from the wealthier individual and give it to the poorer individual. And these are just two examples of how grey this area is, and how you cannot use broad strokes to dictate who is worthy and who isn't. It is why equality is more important than equity. Equality ALLOWS the individual to determine whether or not they need something and give what they have to someone else, whether it be a box to watch a game, money they have in their bank account, or even knowledge they have obtained in life.

AND ALWAYS SAYING PERSONS OF COLOR DONT GET THE POSTIONS ,WHAT A BUNCH OF BS !!!!

@@philipmartin2919 Well if they can get it to 0% then they will have achieved equity.

You dont see through the veneer being proffered by both gentlemen. Class inequality is what is killing ALL of us. Vance and repubs, AOC and DEMS (as well as Biden) are continuing it, while we continue to loose ground financially. The 1% make us poorer, hungrier , sicker while they fuck off with all the wealth. You OK with that? Then why vote for any of these criminal caproate a*sholes??

Yes and unfortunately he’ll get labeled a bigot for this , smdh

Good call both of you. BUT he’s to nice he should call out the bullshit racism for what it is.

Yes! Exactly, I’m so ready for this ride to shift

You people are such good people. It’s criminal. It’s criminal to have such awesome folks as you that just don’t know what the heck is going on. I pray for y’all. I hope one day you can see.

Agreed. Biden's qualifications are to be non-white and then you are a candidate.

But look at the contents of most of their characters today ! Crime is all they know .

It was hard to watch the whole George Floyd thing. You know the criminal drug taking thief being treated like a hero. Nobody could even visit their mother or father in a nursing home let alone go to their funeral. Then this thug dies from a overdose and they March in the street and have a parade with the whole family. That's equity shoved in your face. What did that do for the cause of racism??? What does destroying monuments depicting history do for racism??? Or burning and looting stores for that matter. People reap what you sow. Equity is not only unattainable it actually promotes racism, and transphobia.

​@@bobdittloff5966 Like a hero? Even worse, like a martyr! Like as he sacrificed himself for a noble cause or smth. As if black civil rights history isn't littered with dozens of genuine martyrs... But they weren't killed by cops, though. That's apparently "the problem".

Those days are GONE baby. Color is all that matters. Competence? 😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣

Equity is to provide equal access to opportunity, even if some assistance like ramps for handicapped people are needed. In schools equity is about helping kids with things like learning disabilities or language disabilities, or transportation to get the help that they need so that they have better access to education. Equality is about treating people equally in the work place or in school to protect against day to day discrimination. Equity applies to everyone’s access, Equality is about how we treat each other. Both extend beyond just race. Bullying people for having red hair, or being a slow learner is also a violation of equality.

You don’t use pronouns? What does that mean?

@@theedon501 Most likely he means that he uses them correctly rather than to construct a false reality.

What is DEI?

​@@goldbrick2563 diversity equality inclusion, if im not mistaken

@@henrlima87 thanks

I think we can tell by their actions, and by experience of what these equity things have led to, and the results ARE discriminating and have lowered the standards across the board. It's safe to say that equity is not fair and impartial, but just the opposite. It's always used when it's about lifting people of perceived struggles at the expense of other groups. Like filling quotas, which is exactly what ESG is.

@@Zeetana1 It's certainly true that some people use the word "equity" to propose that things are made easier for some ethnicities and hard for others in order to ensure the percentage of each ethnicity in the workforce is proportional to the percentage of each ethnicity in the population. But what if someone who wants to know what "equity" means discovers that the dictionary definition is "fair and impartial," and then just starts using the word "equity" as a replacement for "fair?" That person is clearly not using the word "equity" the same way that a lot of far-leftists use it. It's not fair to assume a person with little involvement in politics who just happens to know the dictionary definition of equity is guilty of the same kind of discrimination caused by some of those on the far left.

Thank you. This is a good practice in general: ask people what they mean instead of assuming what they mean. Miscommunications happen way more frequently than I think anyone recognizes, and those miscommunications can ratchet tensions and strife.

@@Negus222 You can ask woke folk what they exactly mean all you want, but their answer never amounts to anything more than vague and nonsensical banter because they know the game's over once they actually make it concrete.

@@thenonexistinghero No, what you are describing is a feature of humans who subscribe to team politics instead of thinking through things themselves. The fact that you paint "woke folk" with a broad and uncharitable brush suggests you might be a subscriber. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.

...Something to consider.

That is a great point M Burns,and it is good that you are teaching your kids about hard work and earning what they have. This equity nonsense that companies have implemented(the place that I work has too),needs to stop and these companies pushing DEI need to allow for a counterpoint to be talked about. I have brought this up with my team at work a time or two,but I highly doubt that they will do anything(but yet they always tell me if you have any thoughts or concerns on something,please let us know). Have any of you experienced this where you work? I have been beyond loyal to this company now for 15 years. There was a point back in 2009 just after Obama get elected and I had an impeach Obama bumper sticker on my car that I guess someone complained about. They asked me to remove it,and I was pretty ticked about it. Still am,and I brought that up to both my HR person and my supervisor not too long ago.

thats a great idea i think i will use that with my kids

This. Something I was taught by my running coaches and trainers is that the most satisfying part of completing a race (5K, 10K, Half Marathon, Marathon, Ultra) is not the completion of the race, but the knowing that the journey you took to get to the finish line is what got you there in the first place. The race and the ultimate completion of said race is nothing more than a celebration of all the hard work you put in prior, and a possible stepping stone to the next mountain you want to try and climb. And just like in life, there will be people who are simply better and faster at getting to the finish line than others. Some people can complete that 5K in 15 minutes. Some in 45. Some not at all. All that matters is that they all got to the starting line in the first place. How, when, and where they finish should be determined by the individual and those around them that want to help them get faster.

Why don't they do that in sports? Short people same as tall people on the basketball court? LOL!!!

​@@GillAgainsIsland12 hey you may be on to something... In an equitable society the 5ft 6 dudes finally got a chance with them chicks who only want 6ft 3 and up dudes.

@@reasonwarrior Exactly. We can't make people taller or smarter so the only answer is to hamper the advantaged. Harrison Bergeron by writer Kurt Vonnegut sums it up nicely!

@@reasonwarrior Oh, and nice Rush reference. Always liked that song!

@@whyomgwhywtf Right, and you'll see how fast those chicks will throw EQUITY out the window. LOL!!

You may be given equality, but equity must be earned

100%. love it. exactly what I was thinking. Im all for what the actual pic shows, they all have to reach the same level, by lifting the shorter rather than cutting the legs off of the taller. Everyone meets the standards, some just need a boost to get there.

Right. What's to stop the government from just raising the wall up so no one can see? That is also an equal outcome.

Exactly this "equity" nonsense just means chopping everyone down to the lowest common denominator. So instead of everyone reaching the individual potential, everyone, bar one person, is deprecated to meet the lowest person. We will literally spend more time, and effort, deprecating everyone, instead of supporting everyone to reach what they can be. As a species we will be literally only advancing as fast as a very slowest individual. It would be like having a race with 8 billion people, and nobody is allowed to be faster than the slowest individual on the planet o.O

In reality, the only way to ensure equity is to reduce opportunity for the best performers. Because opportunity alone cannot ensure a poor performer reaches the same result as a top performer. For example, someone with an IQ of 50 could never do the maths required to be a rocket scientist, no matter how much you help them.

YEP ,MEXIFORNIA IS PROOF OF THAT !!!!!

"I make stuff up!"

Bad thing is most of them already have special rights and support but it still isnt enough.

​@@jameson2916 what aboutism

The most important thing the FAA can do is to assure diversity. The 2nd most important thing they can do is assure safe aircraft operations.

@@lizalewis9270 I believe you will find that the previous comment is what we, in the industry of trolling RU-vid comments, refer to as "sarcasm".

@@Bancheis My mistake. It went over my head

@@interestedparty00 You have it backward.

@@boogathon Yes, to say the least. Performance is the main criteria for flight and service personel with all others being insignificant by comparison

My only problem with what you said is you think it’s by accident. The government wants you disempowered.

@@SupHapCak I should have specified, most leftists don't intend to cause more racism but they aren't intelligent or honest enough to pay attention to what they're doing. Yes. Their puppet masters know exactly what they're doing.

"unintentionally create more racism" This is done by design.

It's not pride if the position was given for any other reason than merit. I have known many people of all colors, sex, and relationship that were given positions because of their color, sex, or relationship...not merit. They have no right to have any pride and those looking at them would have false pride. The real issue is, even of they did have merit, everyone second-guesses them because of all the 'equity' hiring. Why is mom proud of her son for being the VP for her husbands company when everyone else at that level has more experience, more education, and more merit? Truth is, she doesn't....except when bragging to her friends...but she knows that they know.

@@parajerry the pride comes from knowing that in spite of what you're told, usually by leftists, that you and people who look like you are destined to be oppressed and suffer, it's nice to see an exception to that. The better thing is that those who do actually overcome personal hardships under their own merit tend to be on the conservative side of the spectrum. I am one of them.

You see what color that cat is? That ain't happenin.'

Precisely what I was thinking. We are way beyond niceness at this point. That time has passed. Bring the fire.

Yes. He didn't ask what the guy has done to actually implement "equity" in practice.

I think that was part of the point though, was to show how flimsy and lame it is, and how it crumbles at the first call.

He should have asked why his son deserves equal opportunity when there are less privileged gender community groups, such as women, who deserve equitable, diverse and inclusive representation.

100% correct

More like providing more attention and assistance and education to the student who needs it. Ex 2 people at a shooting range, 1 person hits the target 5 out of 6 to pass the course. 2nd person hits the target 3 out of 6, so the instructor stays with the student providing additional instruction, correcting the student until the student hits the target 5 out of 6 times.

​@@pogo1140 if only that's how it was executed... I flunked high school, growing up in the worst school system in the US, all these things are are endless cycles of tests. They hope you'll random choice your way to a passing D so they can write you off as "Educated". The other flaw is that you think everyone wants to hit the target. No amount of attention can fix that.

​@@pogo1140 that's not equity. Equity states, regardless of how much you individually need help, we're going to assume based on your skin color/sex/sexual orientation that you need or don't need help. What you're describing is an equal opportunity aid to help those who NEED it. When people talk about equity, they talk about supposed need, not actual need. They will pick a rich black kid to support over a poor white kid.

...and then taking that person's accomplishments and giving them to a black lesbian Marxist with negative societal value.

They would be happy about that,US airlines are government subsidized,they can’t make a profit supposedly,regulations?I think restricting people’s movements is a big part of the globalist plan

i have a few hamsters you could have on your medical team or perhaps a donkey ?🤣

I wonder how diverse the doctors doing bidens brain surgery were?

Exactly right. You dont need your brain as much as you need your surgeon to be a lesbian black trans woman from Ukraine with an emotional support animal and green hair.

You'll get a trans, dog mask wearing duck.

Thank you for the sarcasm!

The meritocracy literally built this country into the super power it became and is now in decline in spite of it.

if i am in a plane. I want the best pilot, period.

This country was built on slavery, lies & manipulation. Check your history books. The ones taught in school, which also vary from one school to another & are missing parts in order to manipulate.

Equity is to provide equal access to opportunity, even if some assistance like ramps for handicapped people are needed. In schools equity is about helping kids with things like learning disabilities or language disabilities, or transportation to get the help that they need so that they have better access to education. Equality is about treating people equally in the work place or in school to protect against day to day discrimination. Equity applies to everyone’s access, Equality is about how we treat each other. Both extend beyond just race. Bullying people for having red hair, or being a slow learner is also a violation of equality.

@@obijuan3004 there is no such thing as equal access to opportunities. For when you raise one group you bar access to another group. There by discriminating against another group. Which is why marit is the most equitable.

That is how the Joe Bidens of the world move up.

Baltimore H.S. grads aren't even prepared to be able to work at a 7-11, much less anything else.

@@joeyalfano4781 This is actually true. Political parties aside, you are telling me that Biden and George Bush (both career politicians or with heavy family connections) were the absolute best the USA had to offer to lead the country out of like 300 million people? And that's why each party nominated / selected them to run in the election?

@@mikeroessm5325 do you live in the area? If not what are you basing your statement off of?

Standards should be based on demonstrated and ongoing performance. No amount of supposed intelligence prevents a person from acting like an idiot and most perceived limitations can be overcome with motivation and hard work.

Agreed, he should have doubled back and asked what the heck the boxes represent if we agree on people meeting qualification standards. The answer is obviously just another form of affirmative action.

Your plane isn’t crashing anytime soon stop buying this crap.

Thats the definition of equality. Which i am all for. Equity on the other hand is very dangerous.

Let me ask a question. If equality of outcome is the goal, why haven’t we seen it yet? See I believe there’s still lots of barriers, some obvious some not so obvious that are holding certain people back in certain fields. The man’s answer was that he wants to provide equal opportunity. And Vance agreed. So what’s the problem??

Don't exclude the luggage thief.

@@calvinjohnstone2664 Or the transvestite who dresses up like Little Bo Peep that Biden nominated for Dept of Health position

Don't forget the big guy.

@Kevin M he wasn't chosen because of his race, gender etc so your comment doesn't fit the statement. And yes, fjb.

Don't forget the Transportation Secretary

CRAZY !!!!!

Yup 100 percent true. I know a guy who moved from Atlanta after getting laid off at the facility he worked for along with everyone else because they promoted a black dude to senior manager after being there for a month and screwing over the guys that been there for over 20 yrs who applied and the black dude did so much damage in like 2 months by either ordering waaaay too much shit or not enough and not knowing how or when to call in the semis and just made everything really late or canceled and it was just so much of a mess that they started laying off ppl but not the black dude out of fear of being called racist and then eventually they just had to shutdown that facility lmao that's what they fucking get.. Sucks for the hard working employees who were loyal and the ones who waited and worked their asses off for yrs to finally bid for that job all for it to be given to a guy who been there a month cause he was black smh sucks for them bit serves those higher up's right.. Hopefully they lost out too and just didn't get the same position and another job

meanwhile in china, im almost starting to wish our western countries get taken over by russia or china

TL;DR Equity is anti-Whitism

I suppose he thinks the start is when they leave to find a job, but it isn’t. The start we have in life comes directly from our parents and what values they instill in us with a bit of our own brain juice. The best start is a 2 parent household where they don’t get divorced and they don’t move around a lot. It’s been scientifically proven. The government intentionally is destroying the family unit and even people being married without children to force them to all be on the same field from birth.

or providing a ceililng!

Then wonder why the person with integrity gets promoted and not them

Missing the whole point! Equity in opportunity. Not absolute equity. You sir are not the hardest working/most talented person in the area. Certainly not the brightest.

@@smoothf1 opportunity filled by equity based on race, sex choice or gender is not only racist sexist and heterophobic its also the removal of opportunity for those who earned it based on work ethic and education, which is what equality represents... For someone named smooth one you sure aren't very slick...

@@thewatcher9539 Not the removal of opportunity, but a slight diminishing of opportunity, ie an investment of the future. Investment in the underprivileged expands the talent pool. There are those who can't succeed no matter talent or ethic due to the system, your narrow vision can't fathom that. Nevermind the absolute removal of opportunity of your forbearers. Not your direct responsibility perse but at least something your can acknowledge. Hence the crux of the matter. People like you undervalue the role of privilege in this matter. Continue to bask in the echo chamber of your belief. I won't respond unless you have something remarkable to say.

Well said 👏

Where you thinking trump when you wrote that ? LOL.

@@rayRay-pw6gz Probably thinking of Obummer. Whom I believe his whole life is based on lowering standards for him because he wasnt smart enough.

And that is just wrong….for everyone concerned.

It's Standard Procedure today.

You do realize that Trump: sent aid to Flint in order to help fix the polluted water supply; instituted a program to reform non-violent criminal offenders; de-escalated a nuclear war and negotiated the first SUCCESSFUL peace treaty with North Korea in 70 years; apparently signed an executive order that made it illegal for insurance companies to hide their rates until AFTER you had signed on with the company; look up "trump accomplishments" on a search engine that isn't google or bing. I'd post the link and explain that anything which states "signed" without having "executive order" after it should be ignored in the interest of fairness as a lot of policies are not his alone, but the reason I do not is that youtube has a bad habit of shadow-erasing comments with links so sources they don't want shown

There is no such thing as equality (including equality of opportunity)...period. Any attempt by the government to change this basic fact only makes the situation worse.

Vance is "talking white" and the ol dumb muniguh can't understand that.

@@SebineLifeWind they want what others have without the ability or work to get it. Equity = envy

Das Raycissstt

@@dm6187 so is extorting resources from someone else based upon race or gender.

Noble intentions often result in bad consequences. Like who knows subsidizing single motherhood would increase single mothers? Subsidizing unemployed black people will increase unemployed black?

The intentions are NEVER noble. Making you believe it is part of the grift.

Intentions are not noble when they ignore basic facts.

Have you noticed that when you have your meetings it appears that you all have diverse views It's only when the meeting is over and you all take off your white hoods that you realize you're all infected with the same despicable virus

​@@dark3031 What do you have against black people? Do you always need a boogie man to be scared of