Förevisning med JAS 39 Gripen En övning i jakt där det ena flygplanet i roten jagar det andra i en sk. "Dogfight" Uppvisning vid flygdagen på Ärna utanför Uppsala 2018
@@martinrivera9186 Why are you talking about stuff you know nothing about? Mig 29's has taken part in Red Flag.... upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/31/Mikoyan-Gurevich_Mig-29_Fulcrum%2C_Germany_-_Air_Force_JP6713753.jpg
Very happy that Brazil bought the E/F versions, instead of F18E or Dassault Rafale. The new Gripen is a top tier 4++ airplane, cheap, comes with tech transfer and Saab even adopted parts developed by Brazilian companies (radar, screen, etc). Single engine, easy maintenance, can build parts locally, translates to availability! Also, possibly the best active stealth for 4++ planes. Good luck maintaining the F-35 whales and training pilots paying a trillion dollars in flight hours.
I completely agree, especially the piece of shit that is “Fat Amy” (F-35). it’s a useless plane with a half decent AESA radar that can be put in any gen-4 plane to similar effect, such as the F-15EX. why even have that useless plane in any air force? the gripen is an amazing fighter, on par with many lightweight gen4+ planes such as the F-16C bl.70/72 and JF-17.
American here: couldn't understand a word he said but it was a blast to watch! I wish they would do this at all air shows. Never seen it with modern aircraft.
Kanske det, men samtidigt är det en liten ikon som visar att det finns subtitles, så man kan leda en häst till vatten men man kan inte tvinga den att dricka.
MaskinJunior Helt riktigt, dock tror jag att majoriteten av tittare kollar klipp från sina smartphones (ink jag) och då tror jag inte nån sådan ikon syns :)
This is the closes I’ve seen, anywhere on RU-vid, to what actual dogfighting really looks like between 2 highly maneuverable aircraft (the middle part of the video obviously)
NoMo This was not dogfighting. The title is very misleading. I knew before they even took off because they were carrying drop tanks which would NEVER be done. Even for demos because of the drag and weight. I'm sure the guy meant well but this is pretty lame. I do like the Gripen however.
@Ben Ghazi the ratio F-22 and F-18 have no KILLs. But the F-16s kill ratio during and after Desert Storm are 2 mig-23, Kosovo one mig 2-29 and su-25 over turkey. But down by lucky mig-21.
@@lasseake Tack, men jag får poängtera att det inte är jag som flyger, utan detta är filmat på en flyguppvisning på Ärna. Men jag är nöjd med den film jag fick ut från det besöket.
It's a pity that the dogfight put on by the SAAF during the defence show in South Africa isn't available on RU-vid, I'll have to make a plan to film at the next opportunity
ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-fBE41A9VT3Q.html&ab_channel=Rapidfire75 You wanted short take off and landing? The older JAS Viggen from 1970... 😎
The closest plane is the F-16. However, even if they are similar in size, the JAS 39 is a Bugatti Veyron in comparison. It's more maneuverable, flies faster, has better radar and weapons. Oh, and it's cheaper as well.
@@azynkron The Viper has a higher thrust to weight ratio though. More powerful engine and a tiny bit faster at sea level. They are very comparable to be honest, which isn't a bad thing for the Gripen. The Viper is a fantastic jet.
Detta var på Flygvapnets huvudflygdag. Den flyttar runt på olika flottiljer varje år, men 2020 blev det inget på grund av pandemin. Men när jag filmade detta var de på Ärna i Uppsala.
Yes, I only had that one camera, and not enough experience to keep the planes in frame, and in focus at the same time. The autofocus on that camera can't handle the clouds. It causes severe focus breathing. I hope to bring several cameras next time. I am sketching on a rig where I can have at least two cameras on the same tripod so I can follow with a camera zoomed out, while shooting with another zoomed in so I can cut between the two.
Yes, I am a armature, What I thought I succeeded in better this time was I figured out a way to feed the speakers narration into my footage. Some people didn't like that since it was in Swedish, but I think it is of superior quality to last time. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-m7KH1vUmnlM.html But I also think the Panasonic200e is not well suited for this kind of filming. I think a standard DSLR camera would be better with easier access to zoom and manual focus. The weight of the camera makes it necessary to use a tripod to last filming with this camera all day.
very cool to see 2 of them in dogfight mode. it gives one a sense of relative speed and size and distance of the planes when otherwise most of the times its a single plane doing various things which leaves no reference point for the viewer.
Hade varit kul med lite mer Top Gun stuk på visningarna. Överljudsfart, lösa skott, lysraketer och maxfart längst marken på en maximalt vågad höjd osv. Som man sett i ryska uppvisnings klipp osv. Dom är ju helt galna där ;)
@@adefk true. Tho Lockheed & US govt might make a move, hopefully they won't & just let it be. If they do, hopefully it's the reduced RCS version of V (same to Gripen if not better) in exchange of accepting V's price increase
Narendra Modi Ever hear of the F-16 in air combat mode? Su-35 makes up of its large size and weight by using thrust vectoring. The Gripen and F16 do it with aerodynamic design. Both work, but there is a lot of added weight, size, and cost associated with the Su-35's approach, and with it, a very large radar cross section. While neither the Gripen or F-16 are stealth aircraft, their smaller size does reduce the amount of signal reflected back. The Gripen is supposed to be oretty good fir that, guven that it is a non-stealth design,
@@brianwesley28 it's NOT in Europe's interest to have our peoples fighting and killing each other, and weakening us. The wars that occurred between Europeans have been orchestrated and fomented by our enemies that have infiltrated in European society, but actually work against us and want to destroy us
Yes, not only that, it was difficult to get the autofocus to focus on right things. I hope my remote control for my camera arrive soon so I get to practice following with manual focus before next airshow.
I love our modern fighters. They keep us safe. But visually for me the pinup centerfold of fighters has always been the F-20 Tigershark, a failure that should've been a success. It's beautiful from every angle. However it must surrender its crown to the Gripen. I'd look so good in that cockpit. Why can't I be 40 years younger with 20/10 vision? Not alot to ask. Life isn't fair. And btw, Sweden, you rock!
The JAS39Gripen is capable of doing at least 9 g turns. There's a video published on the producers (SAAB) YT channel with a g-force meter and with both cockpit and overview images ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-eXaPfUs6sQw.html
As I recall, the airframe is capable to pull more g's than the pilot can survive. SAAB is developing a drone-mode for Gripen to allow to have unmanned planes in a rote.
It was hard to keep up with the airplanes. I used much focus, and was having a hard time to keep the planes in frame. But I think the footage is better than earlier footage from Malmen in Linköping so I am getting better.
Why and what sort of focus does this cameraman applied...when a viewer wonder he just can hear a loud sound of a jet in the sky but never can see the jet a little close and clear. ... ...?
When I was a kid I was literally a few minutes away from getting one of these bastards crashland on my head. The pilots shute was hanging in a tree right beside my house haha. Pretty crazy.
