Jordan Peterson on Gender, Patriarchy and the Slide Towards Tyranny

Подписаться 694 тыс.

Просмотров 3,5 млн

50% 1

Jordan Peterson, author of 12 Rules for Life: An Antidote to Chaos, was joined by Anne McElvoy, Senior Editor at The Economist and head of Economist Radio, to discuss gender, identity politics, liberalism and #MeToo.
__________________________________
Brilliant minds, debate, online events, ask your questions. Try Intelligence Squared +: www.intelligencesquared.com/p...
WHAT IS INTELLIGENCE SQUARED+?
Intelligence Squared+ brings you live, interactive events online every week. You can ask your questions to our speakers, vote in live polls and interact with other members of the audience. Your subscription will give you access to multiple events, live and on-demand, featuring the world’s top thinkers and opinion formers.
Subscribe to Intelligence Squared+ today: www.intelligencesquared.com/p...
Follow Intelligence Squared:
Instagram: / intelligencesquared
Facebook: / intelligence2
Twitter: / intelligence2
Listen to our podcasts?
Intelligence Squared Podcast: play.acast.com/s/intelligence...
How I Found My Voice with Samira Ahmed: apple.co/32WnrPV
About Intelligence Squared:
Intelligence Squared has established itself as the leading forum for live, agenda-setting debates, talks and discussions around the world.
Our aim is to promote a global conversation that enables people to make informed decisions about the issues that matter, in the company of the world's greatest minds and orators.

Опубликовано:

12 май 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 22 тыс.

@martirpeperino 5 лет назад

We are liking this because of JBP, just to make it clear.

@joejoe6952 4 года назад

You're right!

@matthewgroves6280 4 года назад

Notice how the word intelligence is hovering over Jordan. Lovl

@Tahoza 4 года назад

JBP is primarily full of shit... or we can call it metaphorical substrate if that sounds better...

@veradjuric9650 4 года назад

Absolutely! She is close to ridiculous.

@edusmart1064 4 года назад

@@Tahoza Care to explain why? Any evidence to counter his points?

@dellafella22 3 года назад

Jordan: This is not my opinion. These are just the facts. Interviewer: I don't want to hear facts. I want to hear your opinion so that I can accuse you of having a terrible opinion.

@andyd6338 3 года назад

Bang on!

@drdeadbeat1604 3 года назад

Nailed it

@dellamotta 3 года назад

He should have anwered: "I don't have opinions on facts; opinions should be relegated to questions like 'which is your favorite flavor of ice-cream?'"

@playapapapa23 3 года назад

Yep! 💯. Her intentions are as bad as they get.

@erikcortez2106 3 года назад

Claps

@amiascolestock1556 6 месяцев назад

Every interview I watch with Jordan he ends up explaining the interviewers argument better than they do themselves

@markpeloso7761 5 месяцев назад

Seriously.

@austinpoor5217 4 месяца назад

I believe that's called the Socratic method.

@maguszeal5818 2 месяца назад

It's important to not target a person. Rather the ideas their putting forth. Therefore it's positively critical to restate the idea to insure that one is truly arguing the idea. Jordan Peterson has long argued he will build up an opposing idea as strong as he can to pay it respect before taking it on. In this way no one can say he didn't give the devil his due.

@jasonknyc Месяц назад

To the OP: this is SUCH an important point you’re making.

@xbotaleks Год назад

In every single one of these podcasts, they always seem to want to "get" him on some point, yet they just give up and move on to the next question. This man is truly wonderful. 👏🏽

@furerorban9324 Год назад

Jordan B. Peterson : "my message to the Hungarians: Do not rebel. What your leader is trying to do is to restore the metaphysical foundation of the Hungarian culture."

@4Lucy_ 7 месяцев назад

yeah people give up because its nearly impossible to get through a thick wall of words without meaning. thats the only thing this moron is good at. speaking convoluded and fooling you people

@VBSorg 7 месяцев назад

It's a common tactic by "journalists" fishing for soundbites. She also tries to load his lips several times with "what you're saying is....", and "so you believe ...". They're not used to dealing with someone of Jordan's caliber pushing back and they end up look amateurish. His highlight reel is right up there with the other Jordan I like.

@quanthonytrang 5 месяцев назад

Psychologically he knows he has won the argument when she moves on or changes the topic. Typical women.

@jano2419 3 года назад

“I’m not interviewing clinical literature, I’m interviewing you.” What a stupid thing to say to a scientist.

@regalsylvester 3 года назад

Clearly trying to be provocative

@jano2419 3 года назад

@@regalsylvester no, I don’t think so. I think she just blabbed the first thing that came to her mind out of desperation. Peterson was poking holes in her way of thinking so naturally she felt threatened and responded, as shameful as it was.

@Reddog1791 3 года назад

THANK YOU

@sunnywaffles3723 3 года назад

Lmaoooooo

@FASBLAQUE 3 года назад

He's a psychologist not a psychiatrist. Those are two different professions. One requires more science while the other one which Peterson is requires none at all!

@ernstrobertalmgren9057 2 года назад

If Peterson started a masterclass in having patience with obnoxious people, I would pay anything to join that.

@bazooka712 2 года назад

Just be ready to not be able to have discourse with someone that already made their mind up on unfounded opinion.

@oldscorp 2 года назад

The trick is to realize and accept a fundamental truth no matter how revolting or unfair: Good people have to play by different rules than bad people. Same rules don't apply to everybody. Evil people will taunt, mock, bully, provoke and all manner of immoral and uncivil behavior, in the attempt to get you to their level, where they can drag you through the mud. NOBODY will condemn them for that behavior, but will crucify you if you accept the challenge. They want to change the subject, no matter the debate, to how inappropriate YOU are, because they don't posses the truth or the facts and they know it. DONT LET THEM! DONT BE TEMPTED TO RETALIATE. No one will care who started it, and they will blame you, ALWAYS. It's hard, but if you keep your cool and stick to the subject, it actually becomes a lot more satisfying and productive, not only because you win the argument, but because this is what pains them the most. They are getting cancer while watching you destroy their rhetoric with facts, while their impotent attacks glance off you like toy arrows off tanks.

@callmepistol 2 года назад

@@oldscorp That was really profound. Thanks. Is there any more literature on this idea?

@oldscorp 2 года назад

@@callmepistol Lol, i don't know! Let me know if YOU find any.

@alecsandru8588 2 года назад

@@oldscorp unfortunatley the sort of ppl you are challenging with logic comes in waves! so you can win against a wave or two but when something illogical comes and a cryout is made with only emotional perspective, the loss will be closer and closer! at the end of the day you will just have a war against yourself!

@fatimahrahman6158 9 месяцев назад

I am I my sixties and writing a parenting book. This man has caused me to rethink much of my work! I’m grateful! 💚

@generalfusweden3797 9 месяцев назад

Why are you writing a parenting book if you have to rethink much of your work? Maybe you are a student and not a teacher.

@aquarius_bb6658 8 месяцев назад

@@generalfusweden3797everyone Is a forever student of life, we all should strive to evolve our opinions based on relevant new data..she is humble and smart enough to admit that some of her opinions were changed, we all need to open to changing our mind and not letting our beliefs/views stagnate. New thoughts and tools are how we evolve.

@budomushin 8 месяцев назад

We all were students, are students and will be students?@@generalfusweden3797And many great literary works were done by students and not by the masters.

@fardrum 8 месяцев назад

Very few people would admit that, and this makes your work already very interesting to me

@beltsandedman 8 месяцев назад

@@generalfusweden3797So, you decided at some point in your life, that you know everything there is to know and to stop learning? It must be wonderful to be as enlightened and all-knowing as you are!

@nightshadehelis9821 Год назад

I met JP last month in Cincinnati (after an entire year of waiting). I've never been happier in my life. As soon as it was my turn to get a picture with him for the "meet and greet", anxiety hit me hard. It's so weird meeting someone you admire. I've listened to every one of his debates, speeches, and audio books, and he's genuinely changed my life. Anyways, it was my turn to walk up to him for a picture and I got major butterflies. I looked at him and choked up a little. I said "my heart is pounding so hard. You are my personal hero Dr. Peterson." He smiled, looked into my eyes, and asked what my name was. I told him and he shook my hand and said "It's a pleasure to meet you, Peter." His speech that night was incredible, insightful, and downright beautiful. The man radiates warmth, kindness, and compassion. I'm so glad I got a chance to meet the person I admire most in this world. He genuinely makes me want to become my best self.

@furerorban9324 10 месяцев назад

JBPeterson: "My message to the Hungarians Do not rebel against your PM Your leader is trying to restore the metaphysical foundation of the 1000 years old Hungarian empire I would like to tell you a secret about Jesus and a secret about your PM. Another name for Jesus is Viktor"

@kantraxoikol6914 7 месяцев назад

i don't have any clue what all that drivel was. who's victor? what PM Huh? who ? who cares? ...what "message?" nothing you said made ANY sense at all@@furerorban9324

@kantraxoikol6914 4 месяца назад

you are a very scary individual. there's nothing of foundation in your "empire" ....and your secret about JEBUS doesn't really impress me@@furerorban9324

@magx01 3 месяца назад

Dork

@deathrowlemon7367 2 месяца назад

You sound like the male version of a bieberfan lmao

@nkanyezimasondo 6 лет назад

The most frustrating thing about these types of interviews is that the interviewer has no genuine interest in understanding JBP and his views. That’s why I prefer people like Joe Rogan or Dave Rubin who have a genuine curiosity about the people they interview.

@iainperkins2085 6 лет назад

I Agugree.... (Rubin) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-IS71EDAwX1o.html

@michaelfitze7894 6 лет назад

Yeah, she would do better after a few DMT or psilocybin experiences. Open her mind a bit.

@theploddingparadox840 6 лет назад

I feel you dude but personally I'm unsure about Joe Rogan from what I've seen. I’ve noticed multiple instances of him not even trying to understand where his guests are coming from. He also didn’t seem to understand that people aren’t, on the spot, always able to say things in the exact spirit of what they mean. That kind of lack of understanding seems, to me, to be the temperament of someone who’s far more dismissive than they are curious. I’ve heard from people that he’s improved over time though so maybe I’ve just coincidentally seen his bad talks amongst an ocean of good ones, I'm open to that. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

@mabaker 6 лет назад

Genuine interests in that Canadian hack!? Peterson is a no one who is out there to make some buck of out gullible impressionable males. And he is succeeding in that money making enterprise.

@mereniecrosby7120 6 лет назад

Nkanyezi Masondo yes. Truly a useless interviewer as she is only irritated and didn't understand half of what he was saying.

@paradoximize7303 6 лет назад

Her face is that of a person not listening but waiting

@everonlyallforthee 6 лет назад

Spot on.

@connorsmith2156 6 лет назад

The countless ironies are embarassing. She is so dismissive and condescending and just cuts him off when he's making a cogent point LOL

@Medichio 6 лет назад

my ex wife had resting not listening but waiting face like 24/7

@Medichio 6 лет назад

hahaha

@RMutt1 6 лет назад

Paradoximize the simplicity of your comment really captures my main issue with the host of this podcast. Well said.

@CanadianSchizo Год назад

When she says she isn’t interviewing the clinical literature I almost lost my mind. Jordan is basically telling her that it’s not his opinion, these are just the facts, this is the reality. That’s like saying “I’m not asking the mathematical literature on whether 2+2=4, I’m asking you if you think 2+2=4.” That’s not something you “think” that’s something you know because it is a fact.

@onasisgamanya1780 7 месяцев назад

Aptly put!

@Anna-cx4tg 7 месяцев назад

I don't think she's capable of understanding the difference.

@adambrzozowski6345 6 месяцев назад

I get angry just thinking about it, how could she even say something like that, it's deeply wrong. If you are going to talk about something like that it's obvious that you are basing your knowledge on science and research, especially if you are an expert like jordan peterson, it's not a matter of opinion

@7even285 6 месяцев назад

When a woman starts talking like that, you just lower your eyes and back away slowly. You can't use bear spray, so all you can do is speak calmly and increase distance.

@mikehundeshagen5995 4 месяца назад

Common phenomenon that people couldn’t distinguish between person and information. More likely to observe in women in the past years, I have to admit.

@coledriescher9401 8 месяцев назад

Wild that Jordan is having such a complex and high level conversation while also doodling some stars on his note pad. He has an extremely well developed landscape of the ideas that they are discussing and excellent identification of persona that he can do both simultaneously, while still contributing to the conversation and helping the interviewer walk through her arguments. Excellent podcast, btw.

@bereal6590 7 месяцев назад

It's rude and dismissive and an avoidance technique

@coledriescher9401 7 месяцев назад

@@bereal6590 interesting. I could see how someone might think that's being a bit rude, but also what points did you think he was avoiding?

@muffincakes3768 7 месяцев назад

@@bereal6590probably helps him think. I’ll be doing stuff whilst talking to people all the time. Helps me stay more focused on what they’re saying tbh.

@Slegelrock 6 месяцев назад

@bereal6590 incorrect...unless you have a thing against people with ADHD, cause a lot of us do this to concentrate better...I used to do this in school and would get yelled at for not paying attention, even though they would attempt to catch me not paying attention and fail Edit: typo

@jamesbarton9516 6 месяцев назад

@@bereal6590it would be if JBP wasn't engaging with every question being posed to him. He most likely was doodling because she was boring the life out of him by not having an original thought/question for an hour straight

@rupertshean 2 года назад

She's not actively listening, she's just thinking what she's going to say next to catch him out

@cato7778 2 года назад

She's listening to respond instead of listening to learn

@kevinroche8657 2 года назад

Yeah, I thought that same thing

@RSD22. 2 года назад

Maybe even listening for that gotcha moment..but it never came.

@MrGandoff 2 года назад

So? she's a woman! 🤷

@maygonzalez4249 2 года назад

@@cato7778 hopefully you’re being sarcastic, but as a bisexual woman, it is a definitely predominantly a woman thing 🥴🥴

@leemason6184 3 года назад

I didn't know Cathy Newman had a sister.

@emmadabdelkrim3073 3 года назад

Not a sister but an identical Copy

@burtingtune 3 года назад

Sexist! Don't you know it's now non-specific gender sibling.

@josoffat7649 3 года назад

i just watched these 2 interviews back to back and she is not even close to Cathy. You may not agree with what she thinks and that's fine, but, she wasn't overly aggressive, she didn't rudely interject as much and she definitely didn't put words in his mouth.

@emmadabdelkrim3073 3 года назад

@@josoffat7649 you want to control woman?!?!?? She did put this in his mouth clearly

@BanjoSick 3 года назад

I see it the other way around. This is a great interview with two people who disagree.

@My2Cents1 11 месяцев назад

Among the 12 rules for life - IF a cat comes up to on the street, pat it. I do that without have read this book. It's a wonderful feeling, actually. A friendly soul, small and vulterable, comes up and gives you affection, greets, implicitly trusts you etc. It's enough to make my heart melt. One such cat came into my garage. She was emaciated, with long matted gray fur, but with big and alert eyes. I was leaving the garage and she walked with me. I went out by the side door, closed it, and then she stopped. She turned around and slunk into a hole in the siding. Each day after that, I put out a bowl of chicken, and later proper cat food. My little "ghost" came out to greet me every morning outside the garage, and ate her food. Then one morning she came out with three tiny little kittens, and presented them to me. After that, I took mom and her babies into my family. There she and her kittens lived out their lives. We have one of those kittens left. He is now almost 16 years old. It all started with a lost and desperate soul trusting me with her life, and it lead to so much joy. Follow the rule, and pat a strange cat if it comes up to you. If you are able, adopt it.

@magx01 3 месяца назад

That's super sweet.

@elizabethoneil4723 Месяц назад

Very sweet and loving

@TripleGflow Год назад

Dr. Peterson is probably the most misunderstood man walking earth. My initial analysis is that it must be exhausting to continually be on the defense; however, after some thought it might not be as strenuous because he doesn’t have to remember to play a character. He simply shows up as himself, and shares information he’s learned over decades of study. People don’t realize he RARELY EVER gives his personal opinion on anything (unless he’s persistently asked to share), his thoughts are based off scientific data and research. I’m always inspired after hearing him speak, God bless you Dr. Peterson!

@yendorimus Год назад

pretty straight forward

@rusty_junk 2 года назад

She exemplifies female aggression as she's tries to argue against it.

@SalsaColombiaUS 2 года назад

On point

@p.as.in.pterodactyl1024 2 года назад

Do you recall the part where she's insinuating that Peterson is being a misogynistic asshole when he says that regarding aggression, women tend to lean towards verbal / gossip / character assassination (or was it "career assassination" or something like that?) as compared to men tending to lean towards physical aggression (at least comparatively)? Because it's so... ironic, let's say, that as she was insinuating that, she was exhibiting so much of precisely what Peterson was referring to immediately prior.

@PeopleHealthTru 2 года назад

@@p.as.in.pterodactyl1024 The highlight segment 46:05 'Out of control women bullies will destroy reputations, which is the dominant female method of aggression. I studied this 15 years. I'm an expert.'

@PeopleHealthTru 2 года назад

@C Atanic Sorry you can't read or understand. I quoted Dr. Peterson. You got angry and lied. He studied antisocial disorder for 15 yrs. Telling the truth is love. Leftists telling you lies is hate.

@PeopleHealthTru 2 года назад

@C Atanic You are an empty troll bot channel. They are often paid by Soros organizations to tell lies and destroy good reputations.

@HonestOutlawReviews 6 лет назад

Wow this really hard to listen to, it's pretty obvious that she is attempting to trap him into some clickbait statement to add to her bias cause. I'm amazed at the temperament and patience of this man.

@AvNotasian 6 лет назад

I think she did a good job of research, and had decent questions. The issue is her demeanor when she gets knocked off topic was slightly antagonistic and came from her political bias.

@chucknastyness 6 лет назад

He is truly cool. When I was a boy I looked up to guys who had the confidence to walk up to girls in the street, as a man I look up to men who can engage them, challenge them, and make them laugh with intelligence, and charisma. Russell Brand and JP exemplify "cool" to me.

@bajovato 6 лет назад

Honest Outlaw Reviews “patience”

@AvNotasian 6 лет назад

+chucknastyness Russell Brand isn't the sharpest but he is definitely cool.

@chucknastyness 6 лет назад

NotAsian Not necessarily politically but he is very witty and socially commanding

@tomkorb7059 8 месяцев назад

Her complete lack of humility and respect while interviewing someone who is so clearly superior to her is what (to me) is so shocking about this interview. Her behavior (trying to catch him and then casually changing the subject when she has obviously failed) was abhorrent. It’s also fascinating to me that so many people try to bring this guy down. My life has completely changed for the better as a direct result of him.

@bluenotebook489 6 месяцев назад

the interviewer has a beautiful voice though ill give her that

@thebigstick5540 6 месяцев назад

Cmon it wasn't that bad. She's allowed to ask questions and put him to the test

@decembersveryown5935 3 месяца назад

@@thebigstick5540 Body language, bro.

@joebeuselinck6325 Год назад

Nothing better than when he says, “I’m actually quite an expert on [the subject].”

@DrDouble007 3 года назад

Can we just acknowledge that Jordan Peterson is drawing stars and circles in his notebook all while destroying this rude interviewer

@joananeto9607 3 года назад

using the word "destroying" towards other person really makes me think that you didnt pay any attention to the subject. Exactly that kind of terms were discussed, but it clearly didnt sink in. Or maybe you just took a nap mid-conversation

@joshuaslawson9125 3 года назад

@@joananeto9607 sure the word destroying may not be entirely appropriate, how about dismantling, he dismantled every question he was thrown because he understands when someone is being intellectually honest and when they are trying to trap him in a corner with a soundbyte.

@andyd6338 3 года назад

@@joananeto9607 He didn't destroy her, but he disproved her weak thinking upon the topics.

@jamberry8026 3 года назад

@@joananeto9607 Right! If you ask Fugazi to summarize the talk in a few words he couldn't even do that. He just thinks the woman lost just because she was non-assertive and allowed Peterson to talk over her.

@jamesbrun6706 3 года назад

@@jamberry8026 No. Peterson simply used facts that did not care about her feelings.

@O0Q0OQO 5 лет назад

Literally no idea why these people try to end their careers talking to this man.

@MidnightSt 5 лет назад

Our good friends Dunning and Kruger might be able to explain.

@Ashigeru47 4 года назад

These journalists believe that they are smarter than JP, and if they can discredit him, they will be famous among other journalists... They never seem to realize how wrong their beliefs are in their ability to out smart someone so much more intelligent and educated than the journalists are.

@mohannadali9662 4 года назад

" I'm gonna end this wahmen's whole career".

@HisWordisLife4U 4 года назад

Pride.

@jiensuyang3915 4 года назад

rofl

@terrordude11 6 месяцев назад

The patience and composure of this man speaks volumes past what he already speaks. As I need to work on myself I wouldn't be able to sit for very long while someone criticized my lifes work, views, and bombarded me with questions in an attempt to "get" the interviewed. As well as when the questions are answered in a logical and balanced way the interviewing switches to another topical question when they aren't "winning" the opinionated questioning. JBP keep going strong

@DavidDavid-kl4ru Год назад

Peterson is brilliant at patiently explaining to the woke world what we all fundamentally know to be true. What is amazing is that that has become necessary.

@iraqwarveteran470 7 месяцев назад

Well, it is hard to see clearly. Ideologies fog everyone's sight.

@steven71288 6 месяцев назад

@@iraqwarveteran470the ideology becomes the sight.

@BobGymlan 2 года назад

The interviewer dramatically raised my blood pressure.

@ZupaTr00pa 2 года назад

I think this was relatively tame xD

@theoofer478 2 года назад

@@ZupaTr00pa well the absolute ignorance and straw manning she was trying to clutch was blood clenching

@mauroger86 2 года назад

Then I dont recommend you watch the Cathy Newman interview, the Q&A with the australian politician or the debate with that NZ Professor of gender studies (whose face is btw extremely annoying).

@grahamzvi3293 2 года назад

This woman wrote an article in the evening standard titled 'The unvaccinated have become a lethal liability we can ill afford' dec 14th. Just thought you might want to know this to reinforce what a intolerable and toxic person she is. Not very compromising and agreeable at all.

@ericborczuk135 2 года назад

@@ZupaTr00pa Yea I agree - it was no more or less aggressive than any debate I've seen, was done relatively respectfully even though they clearly disagree with each other on some stuff. Comparing this to the Cathy Newman thing is actually like night and day, THAT was hard to watch. This was more like...playing a game with debating strategies. It was a conversation that wasn't rife with talking over eachother/ad hominems/putting words into eachothers' mouths over and over

@mistergooseman7047 4 года назад

It's so hilarious how she changes the subject every time she starts feeling cornered by her own ignorance xD

@charlescrockett2141 4 года назад

No joke, talk about moving the goalposts. Every single time he starts to explain himself or his position, she butts in and redirects the conversation where SHE WANTS IT TO GO. What a crap interviewer she is.

@joanclawford8964 4 года назад

Agree. Some of these interviewers just want to challenge him rather than an intelligent discussion..

@bboystance1670 4 года назад

She started off so well. She was asking really good questions and didn't show any bias. But then...

@johnnyyork3796 4 года назад

Why in the world would you say that..... That's what 30 years of psychological data says. Ohh, uhhh let's move on Lol

@i_found_bacon5561 4 года назад

She has good headphones taste tho

@unpluggedwarriors 2 месяца назад

For optimal content engagement, it is advisable to allow interviewees the opportunity to articulate and conclude their thoughts on specific topics during the podcast. This strategic approach not only enhances the depth and substance of the discussions but also has the potential to significantly increase viewership and subscriber numbers. Providing interviewees with a platform to express themselves fully fosters more insightful and meaningful conversations, capturing and retaining audience interest effectively. Additionally, this approach helps mitigate potential viewer frustration or irritation resulting from abrupt topic shifts, contributing to the overall satisfaction of the audience and bolstering the podcast's long-term success 💯

@abcd3fgh1jklmn0pqrstuvwxyz Год назад

Infinite amount of respect that JP actively engages in discourse with those most violently opposed to his views. Beyond depth of character it adds immeasurable weight to his message. Which I struggle to understand how people oppose - be the best person you can be, live a life worth living and tell your truth.

@marinomazzei6242 6 лет назад

Can we officially canonize JBP as the internet’s “Patron Saint of Heavenly Patience”??? He deserves it after this one.

@scottferguson4372 6 лет назад

It's not just this interview, seems to be loads of media outlets were they send him up against a woman who does not want to listen and then fails to make basic assumptions that would be common place in normal conversation, like thinking that serial harassers are vomit inducing. To be fair though that last point mainly connects to that fact that these women are expecting literal Hitler to come to the interview, not the most mild mannered Canadian dad of the internet. JBP: "Clean your room" Internet: *Sigh* "Fine....."

@marinomazzei6242 6 лет назад

Scott Ferguson True. Despite not really caring for Russell Brand, he gave EXACTLY what a proper interview consists of; questions that allow the person to dissect and explain what they mean, ask for elaborations, ACTUALLY LISTENING to the elaborations, approach the interview as if the person has something to teach you, don’t project, offer healthy criticism, play devil’s advocate when needed, etc.. She seems to be disagreeing just for the sake of disagreement without offering anything concrete to combat JP’s citations of well-established studies. As an interview, it sucks. But for the 4,000 “JP Destroys....” videos/week, it’s another goldmine.

@scottferguson4372 6 лет назад

Marino Mazzei Exactly! I was surprise by Russel actually he did a great job, and I think it mainly comes down to the difference between a discussion of ideas versus what we got here, point scoring.

@NonLocalYokel 6 лет назад

Daniel Luna woah, that’s some crazy demolition of his whole schtick right there danny boy.

@BenignViewer 6 лет назад

The discussion with Matt Dilahunty was also a really good one, and I think he actually challenged Peterson's worldview meaningfully and they both offered good justifications for their ideas. They demonstrated different ways to view the universe and truth, while being very entertaining as well.

@mathdon1106 5 лет назад

Drops loaded question. Doesn't hear desired answer. Drops more loaded questions with a hint of character attack. Gets smacked with perfect image destroying answer delivered while doodling.

@hrundibakshi6830 5 лет назад

*INTERRUPTS* to drop more loaded questions with a hint of character attack.

@shaman295 5 лет назад

GIVE ME A ONE WORD ANSWER SO I CAN ATTACK YOU!!!!!! 👾

@wetwerd2003 5 лет назад

Math Don wow

@migueljackson9230 5 лет назад

Math Don LMFAO!

@anmlkvp 5 лет назад

Math Don das big facts...after the third or fourth time I had to check comments 🤦🏿‍♂️

@Yer_Da_ 6 месяцев назад

Wow she got absolutely schooled. Very intelligent interviewer but her loaded questions, disparaging remarks, and scoffs got her a profoundly well balanced and thoughtful response that she seemed to be bemused by. I wish her all the best and hope she can release some of her ideological resentment.

@leteshalove 6 месяцев назад

I absolutely adore Jordan Peterson and I'm a woman. ❤👏👏👏👏 I'd LOVE to have a conversation with him, especially about how amazing it is being a housewife and mother. How it's empowering for me and how much my family depends on me and what a benefit my role has been on my child and husband. I think we have a pretty beautiful and healthy life, tbh. I'm very happy about what I've accomplished even though our society doesn't see it as such. We have treasures money can't buy.

@kantraxoikol6914 4 месяца назад

sigh , here we go again "i'm a woman" as if your vagina gave you personal insight on something....i'm so sick of hearing "and i am a woman!" as if being one is so special its amazing you actually listened at all? huh?!

@alegator7249 5 лет назад

Another interviewer who came to the dinner table without a fork

@permazero 4 года назад

Al E Gator she came with 2 knives.....

@weldsj8847 4 года назад

I was going to write that I was at @15:00 so far and she was doing fine, asking good, non-debaters questions that brought out some real knowledge. By @30:00 ... not so much. She's in a machine gun fight against a guy in an A-10 not knowing her gun is a toy.

@simonw3858 4 года назад

Jordan Peterson is a runaway freight train these interviewers cant even catch up to his mind wizardry. LEGEND

@simonw3858 4 года назад

Ahh really the pay gap again! They are still pushing that wheelbarrow of horseshit!

@simonw3858 4 года назад

Omg I'm almost done, but the pattern of load a question get shot down with actual arguments, try and steer the argument to the feminist argument keep getting shot down. Bout time to quickly change the subject!

@youen1821 4 года назад

I just cant believe how he doesnt lose his cool during these interviews. Its unbelievable

@scringe1 4 года назад

He is a smart man. Kill them with kindness and facts.

@randomiseit 3 года назад

@@scringe1 took the words right out of my mouth

@megusta2620 3 года назад

He is probably redirecting his frustration with her ignorance. Notice how he is doodling on the paper whenever she's squawking nonsense.

@albertocecchetti2378 3 года назад

he does though, he becames bitter, but i understand him

@th8257 3 года назад

Oh don't be so naive. He's there because he wants to sell books. They both know that - she's working for a company that is benefiting from the click revenue. It isn't a debate to search for universal truths. It's a financial transaction.

@miriamcroucher5079 Год назад

The intrgrity, wisdom and BRILLIANCE of Dr Peterson shines through again 😁

@claudiapost-schultzke7216 Год назад

Bingo

@jamessential 7 месяцев назад

Absolutely anhinatlsted. She tried to disms tled his arguments with passive aggressive jibes and switching topics. Solid performance for JP and why we love him. The antidote we all need. The journalist is a mouth piece drone for the mainstream.

@coltonwilliges1140 2 года назад

Every time she can tell she’s outmatched she interrupts and changes the subject. He’s so gracious that he lets her do it Every. Single. Time. Kudos to him I couldn’t manage it.

@markshanahan8147 2 года назад

I think that's the one thing he did wrong in the interview honestly. He needed to stay calm just as he was and drive some points deeper. Staying with his completely relaxed manner, he just needed to say "before we move on from _ _ _ _, I'd like to elucidate it further." That way Jordan could demonstrate the absolute invalidity of her points. I know for most non-lunatics what Peterson said was enough, but I'm talking about the ones that are on the fence of lunacy lolllll.

@coltonwilliges1140 2 года назад

@@markshanahan8147 yeah I feel the same way. By letting her change the subject he doesn’t really get to show how wrong she is, and she definitely won’t change her mind about those points unless he makes her look foolish.

@reidsummers8183 2 года назад

Hes a master class in eloquence and patience

@frameyard2693 2 года назад

I'm far more impressed about that he is never in need to call it out. He's more focused in embarassing her, by raising the quality of the conversation immediately up, when he starts to talk. Contrasting her argumentative inferiority.

@thealltimemasterofairchess9871 2 года назад

it's weird to see someone so openly ignorant, and who is totally convinced of their being some value in her arrogance. She clearly hasn't understood what it is to appreciate someone who can so easily destroy their opponent like peterson does. She should be thanking him for destroying her. Such an ugly woman in so many ways

@adamcampbellart 6 лет назад

I'd like to say something disparaging about this interviewer, but I'm going to clean my room instead. 😑

@mikelarson8786 6 лет назад

hell yes

@dawid_dahl 6 лет назад

Amen!

@benrex7775 6 лет назад

Hai Phan I kind of agree but you missed one point. Whenever she disagreed with one of his points she changed topic. And that happened quite a lot, like every minute or so.

@nabsterishiy6914 6 лет назад

Well done sir!

@Thedragonwithin 4 года назад

Word

@panamajack24 11 месяцев назад

I love civil discourse but I wonder what she thought of the interview after viewing herself. It’s not so much about him winning or losing, but he had an articulate, well-thought response to every topic she raised. Appreciate the calmness he exhibited throughout. It kept the focus on the discussion/topics.

@lunaa764 22 дня назад

I love how Jordan will say the most well thought-out and eloquently spoken point and the interviewer just completely ignores it and asks about something completely unrelated lmao

@RobinTaylorLandry 4 года назад

“Yes, women can be bullies”-hands her a mirror.

@Gaonaism 4 года назад

Lmfaoooo Dr. Peterson had too much maturity for that but it would've been stellar.

@biglukasabc 4 года назад

lol

@sheilacaldon2371 4 года назад

🤣🤣🤣

@BGfootballfan 4 года назад

I can never understand the mindset of thinking there are no differences between men and women and at the same time saying women are innocent and men are evil.

@stevemiller887 4 года назад

My wife is a bully!

@FelixxAlrick 6 лет назад

"Just to be clear, you think that a water molecule is two hydrogen atoms and an oxygen atom bonded together." "Its not that I THINK that!"

@lukebeaulieu3794 6 лет назад

Felix Alrick well done 👍

@thomaswoo7983 6 лет назад

Lol! It is frustrating. As a general rule if you're male, never go into a philosophical discussion with a woman.

@roliver3165 6 лет назад

Felix Alrick 😂😂😂😂😂😊

@Guffb 6 лет назад

So you’re saying you support the unequal molecular gap in hydrogen and oxygen in water?

@robertlandry5974 6 лет назад

Oxygen is in minority, but it's the hydrogen that feels oppressed

@EZ-zv2fk 7 месяцев назад

“I will now ask you a question then speak right on top of you once you start to answer the question - great shall we begin?”

@test5093 Год назад

It truly feels like she is so convinced of her own truth, that whenever she hears something that logically shows her ideas to be untrue, she just goes blank and just doesn't allow it to integrate into her believes and moves on to the next subject still wondering slightly what just happened a few moments ago and why it didn't go as she imagined. Like when she asks "there's literature on gossip and innuendo?" Like she has no idea that is actually (like peterson says) "a well documented field". And you'd expect that after finding that out you'd reconsider what you said before that moment when you still thought he was just making this stuff up. But none of that. She just plows through without the slightest hint of actually having processed any of the answers she gets. It is an hour long of "I am right and I don't quite understand why my quest says different things than I expected but lets go on regardless"

@anmolsingh1623 5 лет назад

she's not even trying to listen.

@DennisNeijmeijer 5 лет назад

You can actually see her reading her next line and formulate it in her head while she should be listening and as soon as he stops speaking she fires it at him. She's just not smart enough to do it all at once. Like Jordan can

@ZedEff420 5 лет назад

hahaha now do you get woman?? its in your words... everytime you make a fair and valid point whether in a heated situation or not, but generally when they have been insulted/criticized ive noted. they are doing what you just posted bruh thats women in a nutshell (well some of them)

@matthewlarkin5525 5 лет назад

watch her @ 9:35 she really isn't even listening. And she does this through the whole "interview". More like an interrogation predetermined by her subjective narrative..

@ZedEff420 5 лет назад

@@matthewlarkin5525 Yeah in my years of dealing with women that want to be right or No.1 or the dominant type, when conversations hit those triggers the ladies instantly stop listening go defense/attack mode and try and pick apart any credibility, mock what was said or just get pissy at what has been said. And therefor completely ignore the words directed at them in the first place and also for any response you make to the dribble they spew out there after... TOTAL INSECURITY, aaaand inability to just generally control emotions or filter there mouth.. which is why you dont run nations ladies..NUFF SAID oh and makes you look ever the fools

@onyourface207 5 лет назад

Anmol Singh oh she's listening alright! but she's refusing to accept truth, instead, feelings are getting the best and worse of her.

@phils.4719 6 лет назад

Jesus Christ can we get ONE interview with a woman who isn't insufferable and condescending?

@llsspp 6 лет назад

Phil Shen there is a good one, search Jordan Peterson on ‘12 rules for life’ The channel is Marjin Poels

@SunsheildAndStuff 6 лет назад

Phil Shen He did one with camele paglia (wrong spelling but is on jbp's channel) it was good.

@Pavewy 6 лет назад

But these are the ones in which he particularly shines in his answers. I don't really want to watch someone agree with him for an hour, I want to watch him methodically dismantle someone's entire rationale from a psychological frame of reference. THAT'S the good stuff.

@phils.4719 6 лет назад

Just to be clear, I don't mind confrontation and hard questions, and I think I saw that with the maajid Nawaz interview. Granted I haven't seen all interviews with Peterson and others, and yes, it is a generalization that all his interviews with women have been with shrews. Also I do think he has brilliant answers. But I wrote my comment more out of frustration that so far all the female hosts that I've seen interview him so far seem to come into the interview not to engage him, but rather it seems like they want to gotcha him or destroy him instead. Plenty of male hosts (cough, vice) have tried to do that too, but from my limited view, I've at least seen more male hosts try to give him a chance, less see from female hosts. It probably doesn't need saying, this is not a reflection on women being "b*tches" -- rather I think it's more of a reflection of the women (and men too, to be fair) who are in media and what kind of ideology they subscribe to.

@domzbu 6 лет назад

Phil Shen To be fair I thought this was a good interview, she gave him space to explain his views. She asked intelligent Qs as very far as the postmodern left can be expected to pose. I’ve seen almost as many Male interviewers being insufferably thick towards JP as female ones. I don’t think this woman qualified herself to be categorised in the same universe as e.g. Cathy Newman.

@bruceberkow 11 дней назад

Wow. I am astounded by Peterson's patience in dealing with the interviewer's Not-So-Intelligent (Squared) questions. She is desperate to prove him extreme and wrong, and she fails miserably in that endeavor. Peterson, his intelligence, and his ability to communicate, is a gem, and a great gift to all of us (and I do mean "all" - even those who hate him).

@spud8137 8 месяцев назад

Quite an amazing interview. Hats off to both. She hectored as is her job, but was then rebutted, educated, and forced to acknowledge a more evolved and developed intellect and person. Peterson was magnanimous, and patient, with an aggressive ideologue feminist.

@WW-on6bo 6 месяцев назад

Damn I was going to make that comment! Awesome comment!

@OnceTheyNamedMeiWasnt 6 месяцев назад

You think that's the job because of the media circus in which you live and your social expectations; you desire for "big brother" interactions as the norm. There are lots of really good books on discourse you can read one day.

@hansiesma16 2 года назад

This woman does a good job at magnifying Jordan's superior intellect. And illustrating how Jordan has the temper of a saint.

@sarahroberts8724 2 года назад

Love this comment. I wrote a whole paragraph ranting and raving by how much this woman frustrated me. I am decided not to post, and will aspire to manage my temper like Jordan.

@hansiesma16 2 года назад

@@sarahroberts8724 He just perplexes these people doesn't he? These intelligent career women who think they've got it all worked out and think that because he appeals to incels etc that must mean Jordan is against women. He doesn't get angry; that's just one of the wiley ways we antagonise those we want to antagonise. He just can't contain his frustration at their relentless obtuseness.

@sarahroberts8724 2 года назад

@@hansiesma16 He absolutely does. I'm amazed they think that they can get the better of him with such pernicious tactics. It's sad they miss the opportunity to learn something!

@sarahroberts8724 2 года назад

@Suicide Booth Spot on!

@darnelldinkins77 2 года назад

He is talking to a woman who is literally determined to avoid the truth

@iFirestarter 4 года назад

Anne: writing notes on how she can try and push bullshit agendas. Jordan: destroys her agendas while drawing doodles.

@alexzanderroberts995 4 года назад

I just noticed that

@paulesposito7055 4 года назад

Well he was wrong on the trans issue. He rallied support for freedom of speech... everyone got on board, but in that same action he treated the trans community like a stubborn beurocrat placing procedural correctness before people needs. So I get the impression he probably have some flawed logic to his ideas on gender too

@alexzanderroberts995 4 года назад

@@paulesposito7055 yah, no. He has said multiple time that he would respect a trans person's pronouns if they are being genuine. And calling a person by a pronoun, it is not a need, it is a generosity. BIG DIFFERENCE.

@CourageToB 4 года назад

@@paulesposito7055 you have not listened to him

@paulesposito7055 4 года назад

@@CourageToB I know him inside out. He’s a dog. As a consequence, his ridiculous concerns were ignored and the law sailed straight through

@brandonboucher7090 9 месяцев назад

My “like” is for the clinical Masterclass Dr. Peterson put on here in facing passive aggressive vitriol. 😮‍💨 What an absolute legend. 👏

@Nina_Olivia 21 день назад

I think we can all agree that Jordan is just brilliant and unmatched in any challenge!

@TheBear9000 6 лет назад

How badass is it to intelligently participate in an engaging debate on live radio while casually doodling?

@aali4929 6 лет назад

LOADS OF TESTOSTERONE

@robbiehoen 6 лет назад

It's disrespectful. Immagine the reverse. Jordan B. Peterson is often flawless, but in this case his temper was very ill conceiled.

@SuperLloyd84 6 лет назад

That's polite Canadian speak for "IDGAF".

@duujo 6 лет назад

Jordan was doodling from the very start of the video, while she gave her intro and then asked her first question. To me it seemed like he was already sick of her/the interview from the get-go. Curious about what their pre-interview conversation was like. Perhaps he was super tired and just over the whole thing, that day.

@duujo 6 лет назад

Agreed that it's disrespectful, The Frisian. I love Jordan, but not making eye contact with her during her questions for the first half of the interview seemed rude. And as I've said elsewhere in this thread - I wonder why he behaved like that. Perhaps he sensed what he was in for from the pre-show chat. And/or was just over the whole media thing that day..

@quigglyz 6 лет назад

"Why do you want to monetize?" Jesus, Anne. Why do you have a job, Anne? Why do YOU need to monetize?

@LCPGAY 6 лет назад

Brandon Springer exactly it was such an idiotic question that I literally face palmed.

@igornowicki29 6 лет назад

"Money is used for goods and services."

@Mild816 6 лет назад

She is senior editor for the Economist for gods sake, do they not monetize? And since they do, obviously, does their money only go to virginally pure neutral ventures?

@LuiPardusPardus 6 лет назад

It seems like she didn't understand the answers...

@thelongstory6395 6 лет назад

And this is why I uncategorically use adblocks. I don't want to give anyone any revenue that I don't feel they deserved. I've benefited from Peterson's work and I've consequently bought 2 copies of his book.

@andrepalmer5065 10 месяцев назад

I learn so much from Jordon Peterson throughout the years.

@danzohattori 9 месяцев назад

In the words of the great Patrice O'Neal, "Men working with women is like grizzly bears working with salmon covered in honey." 😂

@rules4life337 Год назад

If I had Jordan Peterson as my teacher, I'd never miss a class

@natedagr8257 Год назад

Jordan is internet dad to us all. Watch dad be a badass and clean the floor with these woke lunatics.

@Sam-cx6gz Год назад

"My particular attraction for young, white men." Jordan Peterson

@Cyfog10 Год назад

@@Sam-cx6gz No

@WedgeUhMite Год назад

@@Cyfog10 @Sam sams a weirdo

@Cyfog10 Год назад

@@WedgeUhMite I mean, his quote is technically correct he just clipped that piece of it and posted it way out of context. I shouldn't be surprised at the internet at this point though 😂

@gpcarnage4881 6 лет назад

I love how she got outraged when he mentioned females tend to use verbal motions to attack someone's character rather than physical violence. And then as a woman tries to paint him as a provokator, a greedy money grabber, and some type of Male dictator. Oh the irony.

@r.b.4611 6 лет назад

hehehehehehehe

@grantmalone 6 лет назад

Agree that her outrage at his observation was stupid, but there's no irony in her then trying to discredit him in various ways "as a woman". She's just a weak interviewer with a bias trying to catch him out all the time instead of exploring the points more deeply. Peterson's point was that women on average in the wider world tend to attack reputation because physical aggression is not an option to them. In the context of an interview with clear boundaries on physical aggression the playing field is obviously levelled and male interviewers pull the same kind of shit all the time. Surely you've seen it over and over?

@23BEATNGU 6 лет назад

precisely

@YuyiLeal 6 лет назад

hahahaha, exactly!

@MrDapotpie 5 лет назад

greyztone It is ironic that she laughs at the idea that women do something more often while she’s doing it... I don’t see your point in saying this is not ironic...

@kurisensei Год назад

Tom Waits! Damn, now I have to really love Jordan Peterson

@cory8619 3 года назад

This woman sounded almost intelligent when she was reading the script at the beginning. As soon as her opinions began to fall out of her mouth, that illusion was quickly dispelled.

@QixTheDS 2 года назад

Yep. She didn’t sound terribly biased at the immediate beginning but it wasn’t long before she couldn’t even read the script without her bias ooze out into how she delivered it.

@ElenaKomleva 2 года назад

She's dumb. Gives bad name to women. She is just not getting anything AND doesn't let HER GUEST finish most of his arguments, so people who DO get it can listen. Is she a paid host who is hired to as questions or a catty argumentative witch in a bar? And whenever she gets so cornered by her own dumbness she can't come up with arguments she just says okay let's come back to...". Oh yeah and a few times she actually yells over (or at) her guest. What a mess of an interview did this witch create! Fire this disrespectful, dumb and emotionally unstable woman.

@mri6300 2 года назад

jup just this..listened to it while cooking and I thought this isnt a bad interview..then I came back with my food and we have the sudden jump from the first half to "MEE TOO, MEE TOO"..gotta admit this old hag got me fuming several times with her stupid pseudo intelligent smirks at this point. Kudos to him

@wolfgang2911 2 года назад

@@ElenaKomleva 💯

@gregpezan9631 2 года назад

@Elena Komleva i wouldn’t say she’s a representative of women, but she’s a individual, and a rather crass one at that. But I agree with everything else you stated.

@GM-kp3ux 2 года назад

This woman got exposed so effortlessly.

@nathangribbons2360 2 года назад

If she would stfu she might learn something. She had to read her papers to keep up mentally with Jordan lol.

@5am.robert5 2 года назад

@@nathangribbons2360 she was trying so hard and Jordan was doodling. How he keeps his cool is next level.

@YoungSantasGroupie 2 года назад

Every interview he's had where resentful women have tried to ambush him have gone like this one. It's also absurd for interviewers like this one to say "you seem angry" after all these continual attempts to derail his career, smear him. Like all the leftist, feminist takes when Brett Kavanaugh was accused of rape, how his anger showed that he was guilty and evil. No. He was angry because the attacks and narratives slanted against him were absurd and callous.

@KD-oz8ci 2 года назад

She not even qualified to ask questions

@_lowpoke700 2 года назад

She had zero interest in his answers. And didn't really even listen or acknowledge what he was saying

@starofsiam1 22 дня назад

This is JBP captured at peak performance and it’s astonishing…beautiful to behold. And let me say she’s a good catalyst too… I bet she’s an amazing cook;-)😂

@wolfganghaiden5817 6 месяцев назад

i am reading mr. peterson's book right now and it helps me enormously. a lot of our own misfortune and unhappiness is created by ourselves. it is easier to spiral down then exceed in what you are doing. giving up is always easier than trying until you succeed. this resonated with me a lot. we are the smiths of our own lifes

@Mysaltylove 3 года назад

Man the interviewer is pretty condescending. He’s actually right in what he is saying. She’s attacking him. 😣

@carycunningham6588 2 года назад

I agree Simone. She attacks Jordan... and does a very poor job promoting her view. Bad questioner...asking bad questions, then not really hearing the responses.

@AkeLovesGAMES 2 года назад

@@carycunningham6588 I agree. She never actually bothered to listen to his answers and to try and grapple with them. It's so mind boggling that she doesn't even understand that he's actually criticizing the exact ideology she can't shake herself free from. Peterson: I don't believe you should be viewing the world through a lens of "group identity is paramount." Interviewer: So who's your favorite feminist?

@khaileigh 2 года назад

@Patrick J Mims I think you're the one who needs to watch it again. Sheesh, the cognitive dissonance...

@emotionalideas 2 года назад

If I may...would you consider this...that what she was pulling was lower than attacking. I couldn't believe it at first but then it was so obvious..she was trolling him...and that's as cheap as it gets.

@mofa9745 2 года назад

@simone - that's right. It's hilarious really. I'm sure she'd like to see herself as a radical and intellectual, and she doesn't realize that she's just coming across as thick and nasty. A poor man's Cathy Newman, I reckon.

@geoffreyedwards7495 3 года назад

The man has mastered the art of patience. That in itself is admirable.

@89zafiro 3 года назад

Exactly what I was thinking.

@eramz56 3 года назад

He's playing the long game always

@pametnaradionica 3 года назад

Indeed. I got annoyed and frustrated just listening to her. Most of her comments were there just to try to look smart. He, held his ground admirably though.

@bonnierobinson8684 3 года назад

This is not a game! Why do men think this way. ?

@eramz56 3 года назад

@@bonnierobinson8684 gender is just a social construct sweetheart. Now go back to sleep.

@humanentity5890 Год назад

I love that she is frantically taking notes.... while he doodles on a notepad lol

@Sarcastro7338 8 месяцев назад

If we could all think before and after we speak like this gentleman, the left and right would balance out in a hurry

@deanguiri3058 3 года назад

I love how he casually dismantles her arguments, while completing his crossword puzzle. 😂

@divyanshadwani8488 3 года назад

FACTS 😂

@deanguiri3058 3 года назад

@nick m. Many were loaded questions with controversial assumptions. It's almost as bad as the infamous Cathy Newman interview.

@deanguiri3058 3 года назад

@nick m. The largest psychological difference between males and females is their interest. Males tend to be more interested in things, and females are more interested in people. Boys tend to go for toy trucks, and girls prefer dolls. Psychologists have also done these tests with primates, and the results were the same. There have been international studies, with thousands of citations, showing that the more egalitarian a society becomes, the more different the genders become. In Scandinavia, where their societies have gone the furthest in egalitarianism; women outnumber men in jobs where people are the main factor, like nursing, by 20-1. Similarly, men outnumber women in jobs where comlex 'things' are involved, like engineering, by a similar amount.

@revolverjesus98 3 года назад

@nick m. That's provable right from childhood. Boys tend to be more interested in lego. Girls tend to be more interested in dolls. Lego is more creative and thing oriented, and dolls are more social based. Inb4 you say "not all boys/girls do it," that's correct, but for the mass majority that is the case. Edit: I seem to have the same answer as Dean, so I'll further elaborate on mine to make it more diverse. I've had a lot of female friends growing up, and for the most part, all of the girls who also loved playing with legos ended up pursuing more thing based jobs (which are more occupied by you guessed it, men,) they tended to be a lot more tomboy-ish, and tended to focus more on their careers over social status and had a lot more work-ethic.

@davipenha 3 года назад

@nick m. he dont need to prove that if you do you homework

@pathfinder2reality 5 лет назад

Now this is a man of western culture. A truly admirable gentleman.

@elijones7926 5 лет назад

Alex Martinovic god bless him too. He puts up with ALOT of bullshit, and yet comes out shiney armor and everything lol

@laaurenagreen 5 лет назад

Yes 🙌

@sub7se7en 5 лет назад

Which western culture? There are many.

@dekik.979 5 лет назад

'Western culture, that's a great idea.' Mahatma Gandi. Noooo maan. This guy is a citizen of the world, respects and consults spiritual traditions witch 'western culture' does not. Yet

@arunkarthik5763 9 месяцев назад

The talk show is called “intelligence squared” yo. I can’t even-

@deejayxcrypt 9 месяцев назад

22:25 Exactly. It’s like a flat head screwdriver and a cross head screwdriver. Both are screwdrivers but the small difference matters a lot. Yet both might be able to try to do what the other does. That’ll destroy the screw head eventually and/or the screwdriver.

@mikebrisebois 5 лет назад

People have to stop trying to win an argument with Jordan and instead try to have a conversation with him. Interesting person with a lot to teach.

@MrKago1 5 лет назад

The problem is that the mainstream media are activists, not journalists. she wanted this interview, not to defeat Peterson, not to prove the far left justifiable. she wanted it so she could use him to stand atop her ivory tower and gain power from pushing him aside. not that she did, or could. she is here for woke points plain and simple.

@anjansarkar5669 5 лет назад

So true. These journalists can't hope to match wits with people like JP. What makes them think they have a prayer?

@MidnightSt 5 лет назад

if I may, I'll generalize your sentence: SJWs have to stop trying to win an argument with people who actually know what they are talking about, and instead need to try and learn something from those people.

@glengraham7080 4 года назад

Yes!

@Ashigeru47 4 года назад

The problem is that these journalists begin with conclusions about the people they interview and try to get interviewees to confirm the journalists conclusions. The journalists already have their narrative, therefore have no need to really listen, or learn. They already believe that they "know" the facts based on their opinions.

@aswinwarier 2 года назад

She asked " Am I the average woman?" And got upset with an objective answer.

@Ounouh 2 года назад

...like an average woman

@ObsoleteTutorials 2 года назад

If I was Jordan I would've answered "Do you feel like you are better than the average women?"

@czpiaor 2 года назад

@@ObsoleteTutorials A bit too open ended. Leaves them a chance of recovery and doesn't force them to face the reality.

@palmereldritch7777 2 года назад

Guessing the rhetoric question and all the rhetoric answers are all coming from guys who consider themselves to be" average" men. Average misogynists, yeah :-)

@benchmarkcomputing2159 2 года назад

@@Ounouh gold

@richyarcs Месяц назад

For all those who think anne was trying to trap him, she was not. She was very very professional and she asked him all the questions the radical left want to trap him with BUT she gave him ample opportunity to defend himself. This never happens in his debates. You get guys like Michael Erik Dyson having to interrupt and straw man him the entire time. She did very well in interviewing him and she asked the questions that we want to hear him defend. He aced the test and she made it difficult. But she respected his answers. Well done and I would love to see her interview more people rather than say Don Lemon or anyone from the BBC.

@jonatasorto 7 месяцев назад

His thought process is so clear it feels like watching a Laser speak

@beaubellamy2999 2 года назад

The frustrating part about all these interviews is how obvious it is the interviewers have a specific agenda but what’s encouraging is how much grace Dr Peterson shows while constantly being attacked.

@karimjimerson 2 года назад

I share the same sentiment this man is attacked and smeared and he handles it with such grace I don't think I can do it. She raises my heart rate just looking at her face

@SumeragiMinami 2 года назад

@@auturgicflosculator2183 Having a person who is continuously and maliciously trying to shove words into your mouth is a good enough excuse to lose it already. He was super patient.

@beaubellamy2999 2 года назад

@@auturgicflosculator2183 I don’t think you’re wrong at all. I also agree that he got visibly frustrated with her remarks. My point is that I think that was absolutely her intention,to get a rise out of him for views, and my praise of him is that though he was visibly becoming more irritated he never went after her like most of us might have.

@SumeragiMinami 2 года назад

@@auturgicflosculator2183 Honestly, the whole debate itself is malicious enough. Look at the amount of material she brought and how she ground every word he wrote in his book. This woman prepared for war and if Peterson has slipped even just one, it'd be a public execution.

@testodude 2 года назад

The frustrating part is that journalists act like experts or even intellectuals. They cite articles written by other halfwit journalists, and pretend they are learned treatises.

@BuceGar 5 лет назад

I love how she has pages full of "gotcha" notes, and Dr. Peterson is simply drawing on a piece of paper, and yet she fails so spectacularly. She is a perfect example of how ideology destroys the rational mind (if she ever had one).

@smellthecoffee5314 5 лет назад

" ideology destroys the rational mind" - that'a a great phrase and so very and depressingly true- not heard it put quite so succinctly - I'm going to us that one myself. Is it a well known quote or did you make it yourself ?

@Ashigeru47 4 года назад

Average IQ ideologically indoctrinated feminist woman (who believes she is highly intelligent, but confuses education with intelligence) tries to take down non ideological well educated intellectual giant. Epic fail for yet another feminist "intellectual".

@torro8234 4 года назад

ay league of legend gang

@Lawful_Rebel 4 года назад

I saw that - he's apparently doodling. That woman is an insufferable infant.

@donnadizucchero 4 года назад

I think the ideology creeps in when there's a certain void in a personality. This exact type, and so sorry to say it, but predominantly female, are usually having great sense of low self-esteem, insecurities of all kinds and self-hatred. Ideology helps to turn it into condescension, sense of supremacy and extremely narrowed mind.

@andywre1760 Год назад

Excellent example of nowadays journalism. We here not to ask you questions AND HERE THE ANSWERS, we here to push OUR agenda. Incredibly hard to listen to such interviews, where journalist doesn't give a guest to finish the answer.

@computernoise2209 6 месяцев назад

Where can I print a copy of JP's "notes" after this discussion?

@fleur190 6 лет назад

"Genitalia aren't a social construct" 😂😂😂

@TimBitts649 6 лет назад

lmgo

@Nellsbells79 6 лет назад

Maï-ram 0 😂🤣

@lylecosmopolite 6 лет назад

How we think about the genitalia and what we do with them, is very much shaped by a rich and evolving social construction. A case in point: how Victorian-Edwardian America came to see male circumcision as very desirable, and how it began digging itself out of that hole, starting in the 1980s, and how American finds itself today in the throes of a robust discussion on this tender topic.

@igornowicki29 6 лет назад

I IDENTIFY AS AN ATTACK HELICOPTER

@chrstphrdyer 6 лет назад

Either rename the show or find a host who matches it.

@glenncross956 6 лет назад

Zzzingggg

@RogerPodacter 6 лет назад

yeah it's that thing where you have to tell someone that you're smart. because otherwise they'd never guessed it :)

@renegadedalek5528 6 лет назад

AND have a slavish adherence to the preferred ideology? not possible.

@lastnamefirstname7652 6 лет назад

Well said

@ardaona 6 лет назад

Eighter rasp your claws or stop making comments on youtube videoes. that was SAVAGE.

@bolo2393 10 месяцев назад

4:52 how does he sound angry? He is calmly speaking.

@ebyd2756 Год назад

This is what happens when you are interviewing someone with a fleeting understanding/knowledge of what they are opining on. They are like slippery eels - making misinformed statements.

@MikeHarrison3266 6 лет назад

As I often do, I found the interview irritating because the width and depth of Jordan's responses were as always not being allowed to fully form therefore no question was fully answered before the next was presented. I am convinced he is very often frustrated by the interviewer's inability or lack of desire to grasp the logical discourse he presents.

@pathocrat 6 лет назад

Nobody has ever been treated as unfairly in human history as Jordan Peterson. Maybe Trump.

@j_freed 6 лет назад

Peterson suffers foolishness but he expects it and sees it coming. Part of the yoke he has taken on. No dedicated scholar gets to land in a perfectly logically coherent world. Chomsky answers personal emails to ordinary people every day, this is the burden of those who care.

@robbiehoen 6 лет назад

She did very well. It is the job of an interviewer to be the medium between the interviewee and the audience. The interviewer needs to package what is said. To create some order. Jordan is therfor the most difficult man to interview because what he says is complex and there is a lot of it. In this case, it is not inability or unwillingness, or, like in cathy newman's case: maliciousness.

@3hh73ya6 6 лет назад

Very well observed.Time is always limited in these interviews but McElvoy listens....not always the case in the prepared interview.....and is very bright which makes the back and fore good at bringing out in Peterson difficult concepts.

@willowuffgood6421 6 лет назад

Perfectly said 100% agree

@rararaspoontang2007 4 года назад

She's grasping at straws so many times here. When she tries to mock him about how many dimensions there are... Jesus, she's so out of her league.

@Nat0528 4 года назад

Ra Ra Raspoontang completely out of her league! It’s embarrassing! Like you’d think she’d at least have a handle on the must basic facts! But nada! E.g the percentage of feminist in London?!ffs! She didn’t even have an approximate figure! Ludicrous

@RobinTaylorLandry 4 года назад

She’s drowning and thinks she can breathe underwater.

@brianfinnegan664 4 года назад

Everyone except Sam harris is out of their league with him

@burgemccole2243 4 года назад

@@brianfinnegan664 Watch JBP talk with Ben Shapiro. It is quite intellectually delighting. I would say even more than Harris.

@brianfinnegan664 4 года назад

@@burgemccole2243 it's not because they agree on too much. Harris and peterson is more interesting because they are of similar intellectual proficiency and have opposing views on god, religion, western culture, Atheism, morals etc, fascinating conversation, I love them both, and shapiro btw

@LetsbeHonestOfficial 6 месяцев назад

They couldn't position the mic/pop-filter and camera better for him?

@user-vp1em1qy7d 17 дней назад

The interviewer doesn't let Dr Peterson actually answer her questions and seems to be out to trap him with dumb comments about her own questions ("just Hollywood?" She set the context with her question and that is what he was answering).

@dungwilfred358 2 года назад

Jordan Peterson is drawing while debating in this interview. The amount of respect I have for this man is through the roof

@HakaiKaien 2 года назад

He's probably drawing a horrible accurate portrait of this woman. This woman is disturbingly disgusting

@codyporche98 2 года назад

through the roof and off the charts

@freeandcriticalthinker4431 2 года назад

Haha, I just noticed that. JBP is an amazing man beyond any description that I have the capacity to write. Thank you so much for your dedication and honesty that is so evident to anyone watching.

@christoph4977 2 года назад

The more complex one's mind, the more distractions it seeks while not being fully engaged. Fidgeting, drawing, playing with things, tapping fingers and a general restlessness are good signs of that.

@lahli03 2 года назад

Doodling

@wellwellwell881 5 лет назад

This woman is infuriating. She interrupts him so much and changes subjects when she doesn't hear her desired answer to a charged question purposely posed for character defamation. This interview was both intriguing and disgraceful.

@CELTICSAVAGE32 4 года назад

Well said!!

@marks9935 4 года назад

Its one of the wonderful characteristics of a fool. They expose themselves to the light and thus self destruct and free us all from their mindless, unproductive contributions. Don't worry - Jordan easily handles himself in these situations because of one simple fact: Critical thinking.

@davedoodles 4 года назад

I was frustrated early on by Jordan's penchant for interrupting others--saying this as a Peterson fan--but she definitely went from fairly reasonable interlocutor to sleazy social tactician over the course of the interview, until she was absolutely greasy with railroading maneuvers and sidesteps to find a cross upon which he might be crucified.

@CELTICSAVAGE32 4 года назад

@@davedoodles I dont find that he interrupts all that much.. he is a very good listener and I find that it's usually him that's interrupted.

@blackmanops3749 4 года назад

Thank God Peterson is level headed. If that were me I'd want to revive the naval punishment of keelhauling her.

@deesee6009 6 месяцев назад

JBP is like Neo casually brushing off the manic punches of an agent.

@ericklamrowski5001 3 месяца назад

I love that when the interviewer doesn’t know data or statistics she jumps right to “there’s no way we could possibly know that” when she herself just isn’t aware of it

@Thooorin 6 лет назад

The individual conducting this interview seems to think follow-up questions are to be used to interupt your subject and attempt to suggest you have trapped them, as opposed to eludicate or expand upon a point already made. Quite poor form all in all and impolite to the other person.

@FNsMadman 6 лет назад

Yeah, I thought the same thing. She keeps trying to grab his balls from behind... unfortunately for her, Peterson is a master at deflecting that kinda bull

@ssjgoten202 6 лет назад

Koreans are going to win worlds again :(

@lotheravanti4295 6 лет назад

A lot of people who interview JP just want to hamfist their own ideas and interrupt him. It's good that he has a good reply to stun them with every now and then

@romulus3345 6 лет назад

Everything started to change in the 1960s.. Rock n roll changed the world

@zebare726 6 лет назад

Thooorin She is emotional driven.

@simonw156 3 года назад

My man Jordan Peterson literally doodling while he embarrasses this clueless journalist with 4 piles of prepared arguments.

@imbored1979 2 года назад

He's got God Tier intelligence😎🔥🔥😌

@2highbruh 2 года назад

@Patrick J Mims That's just an expression of witnessing unbelievable intelligence, at least to his mind, if not for everyone. Although, I think too, that he's got very good categorizing ability on whatever questions they ask him, and he deals with them, subdivided which I think is a sign of good understanding in that subject and general intelligence to categorize them at all. To what extent, he does this, since better than average people can also do it, he does it almost all the time; which is a very well-practiced, methodical and obtains the end goal, without too much obstacles in the path of infusion of two or more separated ideas, under the same question. Also, his verbal intelligence is higher than you see in many people in our daily lives, which is not something to scoff at, and also indicates at his intelligence under one class.

@RikHep01 4 месяца назад

These days so many journalists say the heck with civility lets skin the interviewee alive to score brownie points. Yet when they get the same type of treatment they tend to cry and ask why everyone is being mean to them. Civility is simple and shows a lot about your character, being an ass is a choice and reflects a lack of character, These journalists are so transparent with their leading questions and slavish adherence to their masters' orders.

@robertwilber1909 Год назад

Real equality allows that some people are less capable and some will fall on their face.

@suetownsend1656 2 года назад

The problem with this man is that he is so blisteringy intelligent he flies over most people's heads.

@Benjumanjo 2 года назад

In the land of the one-eyed, the two-eyed man is crazy.

@MonkeyDIvan 2 года назад

If he is so smart why did he back out of the Richard Wolff debate on Marxism, even going so far as to pretend not to know who Professor Wolff was? "There was this professor... Richard Wolff, I believe? He responded to my comments on Marxism..." LMFAO

@JayandSarah 2 года назад

@@KrisVic91 he's the king of talking incoherently in circles.

@Legio1Italica 2 года назад

@@MonkeyDIvan what a reach

@Legio1Italica 2 года назад

@@JayandSarah if you can't comprehend what he's saying, just say that lol

@MS-up6uj 3 года назад

My love for this man is beyond words. By the way I am a girl.

@gnoelalexmay 3 года назад

Isn't it a shame you feel you have to point out being a girl - hopefully what most will take away from it, is that you're a thoroughly decent one. All the best in 2020 xx

@michellehernandez9476 3 года назад

Ditto!

@bye92 3 года назад

@@gnoelalexmay why is that a shame? That's embarrassing you even think that

@michellehernandez9476 3 года назад

@@bye92 I think you may have missed Graham May's point altogether.

@paulatling8844 3 года назад

An open logical person Or a woman?

@MrHighjumper83 Год назад

One reason Jordan is able to maintain his composure with this style of interview is he knows his intellectual superiority is unquestioned. Just let them keep talking and they always show their own weakness.

@MrDa55555 Год назад

Better to keep you mouth closed than to open and confirm ...

@Eons000 10 месяцев назад

I think it is the extent of his knowledge and his awareness of it.

@Henning102 7 месяцев назад

I have never seen "I absolutely hate everything about this man" expressed purely in body langue before this video. That lady is absolutely seething. And she's clearly not stupid. She's just utterly ideologically captured.