Karen Read trial: Lawyer says jury voted to acquit on murder charge | LiveNOW from FOX 

Ridiculous

Yes she bent over backwards for the defense. I hope they get a different judge for a second trial. Most aren't as defensie friendly

Absolutely not!

@@zonker845good one.

Agreed. It was obvious just from the few hours of trial I watched.

Yes everybody!!!

That’s Massachusetts police, da’s and judges for you.

There are more corrupt judges than service oriented judges. They set her up. She was framed.

Yes

Judge is connected with Morrissey... their mothers worked together their whole lives.. JUdge is connected to Alberts.. Judges Brother was a Defense attorney for Chris Albert, when he hit a man with a car. there is probably more.

The guy is a clown and only got his job through nepotism. The main resume requirements to be a Massachusetts state police officer.

Judge is equally compromised. judges mother .. has worked with Da Michael Morrisey Mother her whole life. So its like a family affair . Judges Brother was a Defense Attorney for Chris Albert when he hit a man with a car. So its a Family Circus of Corruption here. Judge= da morrissey -Alberts, and corrupt cops.

Absurd

​@@bethpatriots7290who? Aunt Bev? Gotta watch the trial. It was wild.

Yeah she really let the defense get away with their sliminess…

@@chrisgoz7673she your aunt? Disrespectful Karen cultist.

She gave the defense a lot of leeway she didn't have to

She did nothing wrong. Are you a judge?

Did nothing wrong? 😂😂😂 The judge wants a conviction, the prosecutor wants a conviction. Not guilty verdict on 2 charges including the 2nd degree murder which is the charge they want to stick

@@Macsauce313 the prosecutor wants a conviction, yes. the judge? The judge runs the courtroom..she is for what the jury decides..let’s hold the phone on the jury wanting not guilty on two charges. It’s pure speculation at this point. 2 jurors and 2 friends of friends of jurors have so called said this but is it true? The way you Karen read cultists are 68 people saying she did it isn’t enough so how is 2? Let it play out but if true manslaughter is still on the table and in MA up to 20 years in prison. I think it was 2nd degree but we can retry on just manslaughter..fine with me.

Lately??? They have always been like this

she was not acquitted

Your discernment skills need much improvement. You will be very embarrassed when the actual evidence is discussed

I don't know if I agree that he was beat, but the science showed us he definitely wasn't hit by a car. Unless you're looking to contest physics as a whole, you gotta admit he wasn't hit by a car.

If he was attacked by chloe johns arm would be in much worse shape

@@Gle7799 You clearly do not know dog bites, those dog bites a dog will bite and hold it gripe and those are they type of marks that are made.

The judge was very accommodating to the defense. I think the prosecution should try to get a different judge

Judicial misconduct

It's a standard form used in Massachusetts

It’s looking that way. He’s been relieved of duty and suspended without pay. The guy is cooked the only future he has is being a security guard at a mall

False. The verdict sheet was published

Omg😂😂yall will believe anything smh 🤦🏼‍♀️🙄

She declared a mistrial in 2 seconds!!!! What chance did the defense have?

Not true and the note said charges plural. It was read in front of the jury. Now a couple FKR jurors want to rewrite the deliberations after the fact. Typical for her supporters. They all lie

They could have objected immediately. They asked for a mistrial after the first note. They were afraid it was a single hold out for Karen

@@zonker845 I didn’t t see a second in which they could have objected. She read the final note from the Foreperson that the defense did not get to read then she immediately released them. If you read Mass. Rules of Criminal Procedure Rule 27. Verdicts. There were other ways for the Judge to handle multiple count verdicts. The laws is very clear.

How long does it take to say I object. The defense was pushing for a mistrial. Also the jury note said charges plural if you paid attention

Not unless the CW of MA wants to show how over-the-top inept they are.

Trials all the time come back with some charges acquitted and maybe a charge deadlocked and the acquitted charges are over. Educated yourself. This judge is a disgrace.

Yes. New venue, sequester the jury.

Make Judge Bev a witness and she is gone on the retrial on 2 nd count or the CW just dismisses all together. What if Proctor has charges against him by that time and maybe more Troopers go down?

@mustangecoboosthpp3869 it's up to the prosecutor to decide charges, not the judge. Double jeopardy only applies if you are found innocent, doesn't matter what this previous jury decided on the charges

@@jaynepetersen454 Wow, educate yourself, once a jury acquits you of a charge the prosecutor can't recharge it. If this jury had in fact had all 12 members were in agreement that Karen Read did not commit two oc the charges then the prosecutor can't recharge them. The judge in this case made a reversible error on the jury form that was brought to her attention before the case was turned over to the jury and the Defense brought if up, that was the judge did not include a box for not guilty, this judge wanted a conviction and she rigged the jury form to get a conviction and now that same form is going to bite the judge in the arse.

They have nothing to gain by lying about this or anything.

Can’t be charged with the same crime twice

Judge Aunti Bev barred them from filling out any part... only the whole.

Nothing was filled out lol. It was 9-3 of guilty for manslaughter or so we are being told. It’s like hear say. Lol.

She abruptly declared a mistrial because she did not clarify on what charges the jury had or hadnt reached a verdict on and didnt allow time for the attorneys to speak on the situation

In fairness, she could have sent them back one additional. As it now stands she probably should have.

@lilithstribe it's not about sending them back it's about not seeing what they concluded for each charge. She abruptly declared a mistrial on all charges instead of going over what they jury had found for each charge or allowing the attorneys a say

@@stevenprice6957 I’m pretty sure it was 8/4..I read the affidavit

And a bubble headed bleach blonde

I love seeing people fail to divide men and women on a serious issue. If she were a man, no one would persecute her for not crying the whole time or for speaking with conviction.

She is one of the luckiest murderers I’ve ever seen. Also, she has impressive eye sight. How did she see John? “There he is!” The other two women saw nothing. They watched her run to a lump of snow.

@@Luckylaurie777no one saw anything including people walking to the driveway which in fairness is on the other side of the property. But yeah what about the countless cars driving past all night ? No one seen her. She is very lucky the police were sloppy. One bagged her in private convos with mates and what’s even more in her favour is the conspiracies Americans love them. They eat them for breakfast.

I’d be surprised the accidents that happen to normal people that are angry and drunk. She overdid it. Orrrrr she got framed. Nothing adds up. Either way. I’m so confused.

@@JeezItsJeniiyou cannot frame someone where the evidence was already in before any one arrived. We see it on camera. You can’t change GPS. You cannot change car data. Look at what the defence doesn’t attempt to defend. It’s tells a story in its self. Kerry Roberts. GPS car data. the works. They’ve had to make up things and hope to confuse and raise doubt. As well as getting the public on board before the trial even started with baseless rubbish. It should be aloud to be honest. People like Melanie little and tadpole boy or whatever it’s called. Disgusting humans. Pushing agendas. Now the clicks are big so everyone wants a piece of it. Just make it up as you go. Even when debunked they continued to push agendas. Should be Laws and rules. Taints jury’s too as we’ve already seen.

Relax and please get your facts right, please. One thing the public chaos around this case doesn’t need is more baseless accusations being stated as fact. There are NO TIMES attached to the key cycle/ignition cycle data…so you saying that she “reversed at speed” at a specific time (12:31am) is not exactly correct. Also “impact consistent with a pedestrian hit” seeeeeerrriously assumes facts that should not be assumed based on that data alone. I’m also just totally confused about why you’d be so confident parroting the theories testified to by Trooper Paul. Just because the Commonwealth decided he was their best option to call as an expert to testify, doesn’t necessarily mean he was correct in all his claims. Assuming his testimony is true and/or accurate is a mistake. Last thing I’ll mention…ring video was shown in trial of John O’keefe’s SUV being pulled out of the garage and parked in the driveway, in the exact same spot it was parked when KR backed into it, hours later. The video is from before John left to go to the bar that night, and John parked the SUV there himself. Karen backed into John’s SUV around 5am as she left to go find him. Claiming this was purposeful or calculated or that it otherwise proves that KR is guilty of the charges she’s facing is not true and not helpful to anyone who reads it.

Ya - Don't let the facts get in your way!!!!!!! Welcome to the most woke, most corrupt State there is!!!!! You people who live there pay for this crap each day!!!! And rightfully so, this one may end up costing more than $100,000,000.00

GFY

​@@louisdimaggio1517 Trump 24 for 4 more! GFY

Trump will win for the third straight time.

@@louisdimaggio1517if you are a man and a democrat you gotta be a 🌈 momo