Knit Talk - Ep 44 - Adding a Curved High/Low Hem to the Bottom of a Sweater 

Excellent video, thank you for sharing the percentages! I love a high-low bottom hem and appreciate this information. I am sure to use it.

Thank you so so much 🧶😊

Thanks again Megan for the excellent explanation. I feel like I could accomplish this if I wanted to. You have a great week!

Love your explanations! I like to do math-y things, so I find this fun & then think about other applications. Last week = top down SRs, longer to shorter. This week = top down SRs for hi-low hem. I generally prefer top down construction, but… Question: If making a bottom up (raglan) SR neck shaping would - in essence - be made similar to THIS weeks video, shorter to longer SRs… (ala the hi-low hem shaping). Correct? The percentages/# of sts may/may not change depending on desired results. I guess I’m trying to “reverse engineer” a top down SR neck shaping with a bottom up. Some patterns I like are bottom up, and I was curious. My go-to top down is made ala Barbara Walker, where you work back & forth, increasing at edges of piece, and then cast on xxx sts for front neck, all creating a higher back neck. I think Ann Budd also has a book/patterns using this concept. Wrap & Turns in st st … I kept messing up (=ugly wrap pick ups). Since I learned how easy German Short rows are to make & resolve (no more ugly sts!!!), I don’t “fear” the SRs now!

Thanks for your work on this, it's extremely helpful and clearly communicated. Sorry I'm late to the party (although I've subscribed now), and hope you don't mind me asking a question: I've always wondered, if you are adding significant depth to one side, should you also add increases to accomodate the larger circumference needed to complete the round? Otherwise, wouldn't you create a kind of hump? For example, I'm thinking of adding about 2" to the back of a fingering weight sweater, so will need about 18 short rows.

I was wondering if you had it in your que to do a step by step tutorial on a top down sweater with “ set in sleeves ?”