Very interesting and very well done.. Like the musical accompaniment. When a city changes its affiliation (say London goes from being the largest city in England to the largest in the UK), you might keep its rectangle unchanged but simply change the affiliation label rather than have it disappear under old affiliation and reappear under the new one. Some viewers may find this modification less distracting when viewing the relative changes among the ranking of cities.
Naples between 1713 and 1804 is mislabelled. The city wasn't part of the Spanish Empire in that time period. Vienna is also mislabelled between 1791 and 1803, since the "Austrian Empire" didn't exist yet. "Habsburg Monarchy" could have been a more accurate label, but the most accurate label would have been either "(Archduchy of) Austria" or "Holy Roman Empire".
@martonkoves6292 During the War of the Polish Succesion, the Duke of Montemar, conquered Sicily and Naples by the Spanish Bourbons in the Battle of Bitonto , crowning to the future King of Spain, Charles III of Spain, as a King of Naples and Sicily, confirmed by the Treaty of Vienna in 1738.
@@BarrocoBreda1635 Yet he abdicated his throne in Naples to ascend to the throne of Spain. The two countries had the same dynasty, and Naples perhaps was also Spanish-aligned, but that still doesn't mean it was part of the Spanish Empire in this particular time period.
@@fehervari98 There is no conclussion between historians if was or not part of the Spanish Empire, some them consider it because the spanish army conquered Naples and sicily, others not because there was certain autonomy in the kingdom, in my opinion was a puppet state of the Spanish Empire because this was aligned by the bourbons. Its very complex, Forgive my english, im learning
@@BarrocoBreda1635 It is not a debate. There was no personal union between Naples and Spain after 1713, and Naples wasn't a vassal state of Spain either. Wether Naples was a puppet state of Spain or just closely aligned to it doesn't matter in this context.
⚠️WRONG INTIMATIONS⚠️ The dynasties of Kyoto, Osaka, and Tokyo have always been Japan. It was the name of the eras or these era’s shogun that Ashikaga, Azuchi-Momoyama, and Tokugawa, and there was no dynasty name. The Japanese dynasty has remained unchanged since the 6C. Therefore, they should all be written as "Japan."
@Gozhda Love these videos. Please, can you make one on Gun laws in states? You don't have to go deep into it, just the year they gave or took away the right to: Open Carry, Conceal Carry, and buy (no permit required).
those figures are wrong. New York has 8.8m inhabitants (2020, wikipedia), not 18,937m in 2023 as indicated in this video Moscow has 13.1m inhabitants (2023, wikipedia) Now, if you talk about the New York Metropolitan Area, its population is 20m while Moscow region (incl. Moscow) has 21.7m inhabitants. So as always, the anglo-saxons medias are biased and lying. :))) Who is surprised ?
I'd understand why China and India would have the largest metro areas. 1 billion plus... But the detail is in the quality of life in those mega areas. I vote for Sao Paulo, New York, Mexico DF and Buenos Aires.
The quality of life in both cities is improving. It's different from the west doesn't mean it's not better. It's certainly better than a lot of cities in West like New York where you can easily get mugged in the subway or might get shot by any random stranger.
Constantinople fell off the list before the fall of the Ottoman empire . After which the name was changed to Istanbul (under Atarurk) Poster did not make an error .
Still butthurt everyone knows Constantinople and nobody cares about Istanbul? Literally your entire tourism sector relies on grecorroman ruins. The turks never created anything worthile.
