Lightest Digital FPV Solution Yet! HDZero Lite Camera + 1S VTX! (COMING SOON)

Подписаться 18 тыс.

Просмотров 15 тыс.

50% 1

Runcam and Divimath got together to create the lightest digital FPV camera yet. It should be the perfect thing to go with the new 1S VTX. I can show you both of them today and they will be released publicly very soon! HDZero just keeps getting better! Links & info below:
You can also follow on Instagram for more regular updates on my projects:
/ mrshutterbug
If you want to help support this channel, simply use these affiliate links when you shop for FPV gear. Thanks!
- BetaFPV: bit.ly/betafpv-shutterbug
- GetFPV: bit.ly/2Ot4q2K
- Banggood: bit.ly/2OVcf1r
Related Videos:
- Nick Burns Flight Footage with the Cam + VTX: • New HDZero Nano V2 Lit...
- My Previous HDZero 1S Whoop Build Video: • The World's Lightest H...
- My Custom HDZero whoop camera: • Building an Ultra-Ligh...
- My Favorite 2S Whoop with HDZero: • Building an AMAZING Ra...
Related Products:
- HDZero VRX Module (preorder): bit.ly/3Kv6T6N
- HDZero Lite 1-3S VTX (coming soon)
- HDZero Runcam Lite Camera (coming soon)
- Beta65 Pro Whoop Frame (the one I used in my build): bit.ly/3LyfGpU

Опубликовано:

28 апр 2022

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 99

@sixtofive 11 месяцев назад

It's almost hard to believe how far HDZero has come over the past year!

@breakflight Год назад

I'm liking that new VTX design for a Tiny Trainer, which for you is a giant trainer.

@doccock100 2 года назад

Just ordered the HDZERO on preorder just for this application, DJI still for my 2-3 inch micros. If DJI make a small 1s capable whoop board with the V3 goggles at 1080p... then we start all over again!

@PowerThumb 2 года назад

Shout out! You`re doing such a great work!!! THANK YOU!!!

@CalleyyyC 2 года назад

Great video Nate! Very exciting stuff! Glad to hear you got to contribute, and thank you for that - HDZero is so cool in many ways, this being a big one!

@Catalysis1144 Год назад

Thanks for sharing. Looking forward to see them in action

@airdevil21 2 года назад

Big thumbs up for HD Zero 👍 and for your Nate!

@jumpstartfpv 2 года назад

I think its more exciting to know youre making this and wait for next week to see the next video.

@fpvcruzer Год назад

I really appreciate your thoughtful input on the shape of the board. My main goal is to be able to have cleaner, sharper video footage from my tiny whoops as sometimes my analog recordings are just too fuzzy. Oh and I want the performance that comes from a light weight build, so I would love to see your new hd zero build and thoughts on its performance. Thanks for all you give to the FPV community.

@kirbincap8307 2 года назад

Very exciting work!

@TorontoFPV 2 года назад

Oh ordered my first shutterbug85 whoop excited to try!

@TorontoFPV 2 года назад

Very exciting!

@Oldgreycowboy 2 года назад

I like them !!! Gonna need a big magnifying lens to see those things. !!! Good stuff, Thanks !!!

@h2o40fpv Год назад

Great stuff 👏 I want that camera it should be out by now thank u for the video.

@manwithgutz 2 года назад

Dear sir ! You are my fav pilot and gives good and honest review

@RaynerGS 2 года назад

Amazing!!!!!! Way to Go, Salute from Brazil.

@propsoff 2 года назад

Good info and thanks. I didn't jump on the Fatshark receiver and then they became unavailable. Therefore, never was concerned about owning the system. Then I watched Carl's interview and thought this may become something to look at with more convictions. I think the receiver is above a cost that I'm not willing nor able at this time. Looking forward to more videos Nate. Enjoy the Breeze...👍🏻🍻👊🏻

@angelicgundam90 2 года назад

the notch for a zip tie to hold the ufl connector in place is brillant! that is my biggest complaint with ufl connectors.

@baggszilla 2 года назад

Thanks

@anthonyfpvminiquad1728 2 года назад

Nice review! Get us some flight footage with the new camera :)

@MrShutterBug 2 года назад

Soon :-)

@RyanQuellet 2 года назад

First! Very exciting stuff

@markozapalac338 2 года назад

Awesome

@Tokyo_Dom 2 года назад

That lens, awesome for HDZ, but I hope they put it on an analog cam soon too (rc nano 5?). The nano3 used in every happymodel build. Kinda sucks but it's the only cam under 1.5g

@pizzyfpv 2 года назад

This will make me get back into whooping and drones

@wintermute4755 2 года назад

Awesome. I hope they sort out the availability issues. I have a feeling bashing around in a whoop these things might break a lot. It would stink to break one and not be able to replace it for a long time.

@MrShutterBug 2 года назад

I explain the availability timeline at the end of the video. The VRX should ship out to retailers in a week or so, and the other components in late May. Hopefully HDZero can keep up with the high demand for these products after that.

@UnravelledMoney 2 года назад

HDZero VRX in my opinion is still too expensive for what it is IF you're just getting into digital fpv flying. I'd still consider DJI to be ahead in terms of picture quality. However if the prices drop and it becomes more feasible in cost comparison I can definitely see myself purchasing the HDZERO

@MrShutterBug 2 года назад

DJI looks great but I personally really enjoy HDZero and HDZero is the only way to go digital on these light weight 1S builds.

@UnravelledMoney 2 года назад

@@MrShutterBug yes I definitely agree on the 1s builds but have you heard developments over at DJI for a upcoming revamp OR closing off their air units however I belive it would be the former. Considering they are building and designing sub 250g drones.

@faktionfpv3590 2 года назад

@@UnravelledMoney perhaps a slight downside of dji is that we have absolutely no clue xd

@TimeFadesMemoryLasts 2 года назад

DJI has the better picture quality but everything else is better in HDZERO in my opinion. It just works like a normal analog setup with all betaflight features, just that it's digital. I guess better picture quality is only possible if you introduce a lot of delay, which is not good for racing. But I guess in the future when there are even faster chips available this last problem of HDZERO can be tackled. And making HDZERO Open Source is the absolute DJI killer because from then on DJI needs to battle with free digital VTX software that is developed by people from all around the world who just want to make the system better for everyone without monetary gains in mind. Open Source is what made our FPV hobby possible in the first place so I'm sure HDZERO is in a great place for the future. I'm not so sure about that for DJI (in the FPV hobby). If they step up their game, maybe they can turn it around and increase their stagnating FPV market share.

@UnravelledMoney 2 года назад

@@TimeFadesMemoryLasts True to all of above, however if you factor in cost of HDzero VRX unit, a compatible goggles, vtx and camera unit. It is as much as the DJI vista or even the air unit combined with transmitter. In fact the built in DJI goggles receiver is already a positive factor. If you already have goggles and transmitter then I can see HDzero to ve the go to!

@sylaswojciechowski6895 2 года назад

And dont forget, open source hardware! Pretty darn cool

@MrShutterBug 2 года назад

Yeah that will be cool! They already make a reference vtx design available, but having a really good open source project like ELRS has could make it way better I’ll bet!

@yodabuttscrumdiddly400 2 года назад

Great video. I’m very excited about the whoop options and the timeline. I have a HM Moblite7 which I plan to HDZero-ify. Any advice as to whether or not that frame will work with adding HDZero? Or would you suggest a different 75mm frame? I have a TPU canopy which fits the original canopy, and holds the camera by the lens. Probably will need a new one that has mounting screws. I also have a Beta65 Pro I’d like to convert one day, but with the larger props I don’t know what other frames could work. Maybe just stacking the boards would be OK. Thanks for the teaser info!

@MrShutterBug 2 года назад

A 75mm 1S with HDZero should be great, in fact Nick Burns showed one like that on his channel. In general, 75mm will give you more speed, and better efficiency, and more acrobatic ability, compared to 65mm. But, I'm still interested in 65mm for myself because that's the racing spec around here. Now the Moblite7 frame should work, but it does not have room for an FC underneath unless you change the battery tray somehow. So with that frame, I think you would end up stacking the VTX above the FC, but that should work just fine. Regarding the "Beta65 Pro" frame you mentioned, do you mean the "Meteor65 Pro"? With the Meteor65 Pro frame, you would also have to stack the VTX above the FC because there is no room on the bottom and VTX will not fit in the FC's spot due to the larger hoops. Hope that helps. :-)

@yodabuttscrumdiddly400 2 года назад

@@MrShutterBug yes I meant Meteor65 Pro. I’ll preorder a set for my Moblite7 and then maybe this Winter look at upgrading the Meteor65 Pro. I recently added an ELRS receiver to my Moblite7 for proximity flying outside around my house. So I can’t wait to add HDZero for a better picture and video penetration than the AIO VTX. I’m OK with stacking the boards as I just freestyle so the higher profile doesn’t bother me. Thanks!

@mopatop3921 2 года назад

@@MrShutterBug thanks for the insight! can you think of any way the mob7 v4 frame could be modified maybe with a printer to get the FC under the VTX? Thanks!

@imothy 2 года назад

could you do a video on how you made your own camera? Or maybe just how to disassemble these micro cameras and try different lenses? I have a bunch in a pile and I know i scratch lenses and end up buying entirely new cameras when some of the lenses i have might be salvageable or just use one to give me a different FOV perspective in flight. Thanks!

@MrShutterBug 2 года назад

I have a very old video where I showed how to fix the lens on the Beta75X camera. Most cameras work the same way, so that might give you a good idea. If there's no glue, then you can probably just unscrew the lens and screw a new one in. The trick is adjusting it until the image is in focus. As for making custom camera bodies, that requires a 3D printer and some trial and error (see my previous video).

@dextergreenman2162 2 года назад

nice video, as always. I have an 24000KV Mobula6 as a freestyle whoop. du you think it's still fun to fly with that weight attached? The motors could carry it, I'm sure.

@MrShutterBug 2 года назад

Yeah, it's totally fun. However, if you're going to put HD on a 65mm whoop, then it's worth taking a few steps to reduce weight in other places if you can. Every gram counts.

@primoziskra6394 2 года назад

If you are interested in my wersion of whoop canopy. Made for RunCam nano 3. Printed in nylon just 0.6g.

@MrShutterBug 2 года назад

Nice! 0.6 grams is good. I'm going to make one too and it will be about the same weight, but I would be happy to take a look at yours too. Got a link?

@NOXFPV 2 года назад

Liked and subbed.

@NarcolepticLTD 2 года назад

Are you saying soon it'll be possible to run a 1s tooth pick on hdzero? That, is, awesome! I may have missed it in the video, but what is the output power? Swappable from max to 25mw? Supports elrs backpack? Yes? 😁 If it's all that I want to try this in a racing stack

@MrShutterBug 2 года назад

Yes. 1S HDZero toothpick will totally be a thing. Power output is 25mW or 200mW.

@NarcolepticLTD 2 года назад

@@MrShutterBug that's awesome 👍 hopefully the preorders start shipping on the VRX soon and these item start becoming available

@ChrisGripeos 2 года назад

my HDZ Vtx boards get pretty hot on my 3" (carbon fiber) frame. How will that affect the plastic frame of Whoops? Does the 1v board get as hot?

@MrShutterBug 2 года назад

It can get pretty hot if the VTX is on when when the drone is on the ground, but not hot enough to melt a whoop frame. I recommend using "low power" mode so that it only broadcasts at 25mW when the drone is disarmed. That will help.

@10fantic 2 года назад

Well crap, it’s getting harder to stay with DJI everyday, this stuff is amazing…….

@daich 2 года назад

Lens might be similar to the one used on the insta360 go?

@MrShutterBug 2 года назад

The lens in this new camera is tiny. Much smaller than the lens on the Insta360 GO.

@samuelpoelman8703 2 года назад

Hey, I am new to the hobby and want to build an HDZero 1s quad, where can I find a carbon fiber frame that fits this VTX?

@MrShutterBug 2 года назад

The mounting of the VTX is just like any whoop-style AIO (all in one) flight controller. Therefore, if a frame says that it supports AIOs, then it can probably work. Just use longer screws and some spacers to stack the VTX on top of the FC (or visa versa). My favorite 1S carbon frame is probably the Babytooth from FPVCycle.com. You can see videos on my channel about the 1S Babytooth build. There are plenty of other frames too if you search around. 2.5" or 65mm 2-blade props also make for a good 1S build. So that's another option.

@samuelpoelman8703 2 года назад

@@MrShutterBug Thanks man, that helps a lot

@ctrlaltdude 2 года назад

Awesome! I mainly fly 1S whoops so this is a great development. Now I need to find a way to hook this up to my DJI goggles....

@seablake4116 2 года назад

It's really hard but possible

@ctrlaltdude Год назад

@@seablake4116 I bought a HDMI to RCA converter. That works fine with the DJI analog input. I cannot measure input lag though so that could be an issue. But HDzero stuff is still not available so this is something for next year anyways I guess.

@MrDeathFPV 2 года назад

what about the tinyhawk 3 frame? looks like there is space for this to be mounted in the bottom and the fc in the top or vice versa

@RyanQuellet 2 года назад

Yes, fits perfect underneath. Check my channel for a video of this installed

@MrShutterBug 2 года назад

That can probably work, but I haven't tried it myself. I don't have a tinyhawk.

@MrDeathFPV 2 года назад

@@RyanQuellet sweet, ive been loving fitting an hglrc nano whoop mount vtx in the bottom of my th3 frame.. i look forward to entering the digital game

@MrDeathFPV 2 года назад

@@MrShutterBug great .. i cant wait to try . ive done external analog vtx installed in the under part of the th3 frame and works really well

@jermadjesty Год назад

have you built a babytooth with this yet? was looking for a video :)

@MrShutterBug Год назад

Not exactly, but I do have a 2S Babytooth with HDZero and I love it!

@imothy 2 года назад

do you have a link to that canopy?

@MrShutterBug 2 года назад

Do you mean the blue canopy on my HDZero 1S whoop? I made a video about that build. You can find the STL link in the video description text. Cheers! ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-44Bu2HgIWkM.html

@robertfpv7733 2 года назад

Ugh wish DJI would also come out with something similar be probably won’t ever happen. Heavy air units and vistas

@elxero2189 2 года назад

can't we used the cameras in cell phones for our quads? they don't much lighter or smaller and they are damn good

@MrShutterBug 2 года назад

Phones take great pictures these days. The phone lenses might work for FPV, but the electronics probably wouldn't because phones are not optimized for latency like FPV cameras are.

@lmichaelross 2 года назад

Will this be compatible the the sharkbyte vrx?

@MrShutterBug 2 года назад

Yes

@sketchpv3080 2 года назад

These are excellent advancements on the VTX and camera but it’s the RX that’s still lacking. HDZero won’t really have my attention until a binocular goggle with built-in RX is released.

@MrShutterBug 2 года назад

They are working on dedicated goggles. That will be really exciting because it should be able to achieve even lower latency! Hopefully those will be ready this summer sometime.

@pirateradioFPV 2 года назад

Hmmh. They could've designed it so it can also fit 20x20, looks like the board has plenty of room for double holes.

@virajshah2101 2 года назад

so whats new about the vrx

@MrShutterBug 2 года назад

Mostly the same, but there are a few changes. I hope to go over those differences in a future video.

@samcarmel6975 2 года назад

It’s hdzero fatsharks thing?

@MrShutterBug 2 года назад

Yes it is the same system. Divimath is the company that designed the whole HDZero system. FatShark licensed HDZero and rebranded it as “SharkByte”, but they are no longer involved today. Now Divimath has taken charge and they continue to make HDZero product without Fatshark’s help.

@samcarmel6975 2 года назад

@@MrShutterBug awesome 👏 thank you for the answer! I’m gonna swap my fleet over. I love the idea of a digi tinywhoop

@abin3475 2 года назад

Make it works with dji googles🙏

@MrShutterBug 2 года назад

Unfortunately the DJI goggles don't support HDMI input.

@abin3475 2 года назад

@@MrShutterBug just output :(

@seablake4116 2 года назад

In my opinion that is all still too heavy for tiny whoop racing granted I am flying tiny whoops that weigh less than 20 g with really high KV motors and almost killing batteries

@MrShutterBug 2 года назад

A light build with HDZero can now get pretty close to 20 grams. Analog will continue to have a weight advantage for the foreseeable future, but the gap is getting smaller and smaller. I think it's getting to the point where a pilot could choose to fly HD and still have a good shot at winning. They won't be as light as their analog competitors, but they will be able to see more clearly. Depending on the lighting conditions, that could make a big difference too. Anyway, it's a step in the right direction. I love seeing the tech improve at such a fast pace! I would also love to see an HD spec class in the future. That would be a lot of fun, and much better for spectators too (HDMI to the big screen!)

@sleepingbearffg5008 2 года назад

All my dji was stolen.. might not replace??

@andreschapero3615 2 года назад

Where do people with low mechanical skills go to learn how to build tiny drones ? I´m fascinated by drone builds but cannot put an IKEA chair together. HELP !

@MrShutterBug 2 года назад

RU-vid is a great place to learn! There are many videos that cover techniques as well as start-to-finish drone builds. You can also buy drones that are already built, but it is still a good idea to learn how to fix them after a crash. :-)

@Loz348 2 года назад

i thought fatshart made the firmware/software and gave it to hdz so they could make hardware, ok they may have tweeked it a bit with the updates but is it not fatshark that gave it away to hdz so if thats the case then well done fatshark cos without them there would be no hdz and i dont care what you fs haters say

@MrShutterBug 2 года назад

I don't hate Fatshark. My HDO2s are my main goggles. But FatShark did not develop the HDZero/SharkByte system. The circuit design and the firmware were always made by Divimath, from the very beginning. FatShark licensed it to make a product that fit on their goggles. That product helped the system get started in the FPV market, so I'm thankful for that. Make sense?

@Loz348 2 года назад

@@MrShutterBug makes perfect sense, im not hating on hdz altho i fly dji i have alot more invested in hdz with orqa v2, 04x, farshark scout hd, expensive oled hdmi video gogs and more and all bought just to try and make hdz work for me, im keen for the whoop stuff and eger for your 65mm build. I wand hdz for racing and whoops and dji for everything else. But im learning everyday just like the rest of you and look forward to the future in both systems. I do hate analogue tho i been spoiled for too long now

@knoopx 2 года назад

As good as the open source announcement looks, HDZero would never be as successful as ELRS. Individual efforts will be always against their business interests and will drive community away. An example of this is Prusa, even though their hardware and software is open source, community never had a real impact on their products and their maintainers are very uneager to merge contributions unless they are simple bug fixes.