Lumix 70-300mm S f4.5-5.6 Macro O.I.S - Perfect ZOOM for your Panasonic camera?

Подписаться 34 тыс.

Просмотров 19 тыс.

50% 1

Review of the NEW Lumix 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 Macro O.I.S lens with photo and video samples.
#lumix70300 #lumix #lumixlensreview
Buy me a coffe: www.paypal.com/paypalme/PavSz
-----------
"I shoot people for a living" T-Shirts and apparel:
US Shop: shop.spreadshirt.com/pavsz/
UK Shop: shop.spreadshirt.co.uk/pavsz/
------------
Gear I use to make my RU-vid videos with (affiliate links):
Amazon US:
www.amazon.com/shop/pavsz
Amazon UK:
www.amazon.co.uk/shop/pavsz
I am a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for me to earn fees by linking to Amazon.co.uk/.com and affiliated sites.
-----------
Facebook: / pavonyoutube
Instagram: / pav_sz
Twitter: / pav_sz
----------
Running Order:
00:00 Start
00:16 Introductions
00:59 Performance
04:59 The Build
06:57 Price/Value
07:53 Conclusion

Хобби

Опубликовано:

30 июл 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 70

@clarkejones8090 3 года назад

Lovely Images , Pav . Thank you for this review.

@PavSZ 3 года назад

Many thanks!

@TerapiaNoFogo 2 года назад

Thank You for your review! Amazing work!

@PavSZ 2 года назад

Thank you!!

@iamhassan9943 3 года назад

Another good review Pav.

@PavSZ 3 года назад

thank you!

@LucaBono.Studio 3 года назад

Great review Pav! I see a nervous defocused area from this lens, but it doesn't bother me...I'd like to use it for landscape photography!

@PavSZ 3 года назад

thank you! Great lens for landscape and portrait!

@user-yc4kz1ft3y 3 месяца назад

Thank you for you video. It's really nice to me.

@doogieham 3 года назад

Paz, I love your portrait work. Please consider doing a series of BTS videos showing how you use natural light to style your portraits.

@PavSZ 3 года назад

Thank you very much! I'd love to do some BTS videos but it's a bit difficult when I shoot on my own

@HandmadeByHobbs 3 года назад

I’ve watched a ton of your videos, didn’t realize I wasn’t subscribed until I saw your post on Facebook. Subscribed now 👍🏻 great work!

@PavSZ 3 года назад

Awesome! Thank you!

@HandmadeByHobbs 3 года назад

@@PavSZ your videos are actually what convinced me to get the S5 👍🏻

@PavSZ 3 года назад

@@HandmadeByHobbs I hope there is no regrets 😉

@HandmadeByHobbs 3 года назад

@@PavSZ absolutely none. I am hoping to start producing content soon 🤙🏻

@PavSZ 3 года назад

@@HandmadeByHobbs awesome! hit me with a link when you are uploading

@FigleyCreative 3 года назад

I preordered this lens to take advantage of the $250 discount. Very excited! I do understand those who say this is overpriced, but I think there are factors that justify at least some of the price. I would highlight them here but don't really feel like typing that much! I am personally going to enjoy the reach and small form factor...perfect for my hiking adventures and no tripod!

@PavSZ 3 года назад

I think it is well priced for what it is - especially if you can take advantage of the discount right now

@TheFlyFishingFilmmaker 7 месяцев назад

Curious if you noticed the autofocus issues that Pav mentioned in the video?

@FigleyCreative 7 месяцев назад

@@TheFlyFishingFilmmaker I didn't hold onto the lens! I realized that for my needs the slow aperture at the long end wasn't going to cut it for many of the lower-light situations I often find myself shooting.

@nocturnal1970 5 месяцев назад

@@FigleyCreative How you like the 300mm f2.8 instead?

@jeromeh3605 3 года назад

Thanks for this review. i have already the Sigma 100-400 DG DN. it is a perfect lens so I'm afraid this 70-200 will be duplicated... For the macro, i am considering buying the Sigma 105 DG DN.

@PavSZ 3 года назад

I couldn't agree with you more

@__YASH 3 года назад

Lovely

@PavSZ 3 года назад

thanks!

@stevenverhaegen7552 Год назад

Hi Pav, great review! I was wondering if you think this lens in combination with the S5 would be ok for low light situations as in for instance concert photography? F2.8 would obviously be better but i can't afford the panasonic 70-200 f2.8. 😅

@PavSZ Год назад

I think it would be ok. In my opinion concert photography is not that low light. S5 has also very good high ISO performance to compensate

@aiseurnae5976 3 года назад

I have the 50-200mm Leica for my GH5 but I wonder if I could replace it with this 70-300mm ? Tonality, low light and bokeh seem better !

@PavSZ 3 года назад

I think 70-300 is much more sophisticated lens. Only you can decide

@NikolaosTsarmpopoulos 2 года назад

Would be useful if you compared it with the Lumix S Pro 70-200mm F4.

@PavSZ 2 года назад

I might do that video soon

@michalleechocniebruce 7 месяцев назад

Przez ten obiektyw chce Lumix’a S5 m.2!

@PavSZ 7 месяцев назад

Haha Poproś Mikołaja 😉

@BiggeDink 3 года назад

You might mention whether it's for M4/3 or L-mount.

@PavSZ 3 года назад

it is L-Mount only

@OntheBrightSide-kn8qp 3 месяца назад

I ordered the 70-200 F4 for $892 US and the 70-300 F4.5-5.6 for $814 US. I'll compare them when they arrive, but which do you prefer?

@PavSZ 3 месяца назад

70-200 f4 is my go to lens when I need the zoom these days

@Closer80IT Год назад

if you want to save some money, use a Nisi close up lens... for just $120 you can add a very good macro to this lens... I am testing right now...

@PavSZ Год назад

for sure

@angelvillanueva4518 3 года назад

hello Pav, do you think the sigma 100-400 could be a better option ??? than the LUMIX 70-300???

@PavSZ 3 года назад

it all depends on what you actually shoot and what are your preferences. I do like Sigma 100-400 a lot and I have reviewed it awhile ago but this is also a decent lens. There is also a big price difference between them

@wparo 3 года назад

Hello thank you for the video. Very clear information. I had to return the lumix S5 after just oneday using it. It is just bad. I don't understand why people are so hyped about it. Even my phone has better auto focus. It is a shame really.

@PavSZ 3 года назад

thank you for watching! S5 is a very capable camera - I think photo auto focusing is on par with any other current mirrorless camera and for video is 100% better than auto focusing of any BlackMagic or Red camera 😉

2 года назад

Czy próbowałeś ponownie fotografować tym obiektywem już produkcyjnym i z najnowszym oprogramowaniem? Czy Panasonic usunął wymienione przez Ciebie wady? Pozdrawiam

@PavSZ 2 года назад

sorry ale nie

@angelvillanueva4518 3 года назад

you could compare it with the Sigma 100-400 and talk about its uses

@PavSZ 3 года назад

I will be doing that comparison when I can get a production copy of this lens in May

@angelvillanueva4518 3 года назад

@@PavSZ thanks you have excellent content on your channel greetings from Puerto Rico island 🏝

@PavSZ 3 года назад

@@angelvillanueva4518 thank you!

@viridiantellus5665 3 года назад

@@PavSZ waiting for that comparison video, cheers!

@sansin6250 Год назад

@@PavSZ Did you get a chance to compare this lens to the Sigma 100-400 DG DN OS ?

@garreswe Год назад

How does it perform in poor lighting? The f4.5-5.6 worries me for evening/night shooting.

@PavSZ Год назад

as expected. It's how you use it and with what cameras. All current Lumix cameras have very good high ISO performance

@joelogan4260 2 года назад

I got the Leica 90-280

@PavSZ 2 года назад

good for you! about the same price and very comparable lens to this

@iustitiaepervenit 2 года назад

Considering I had similar lens from Canon used for 300$, I couldn't imagine paying 1200$ for such a lens. but I found a deal for 500$ So I think for this price it is worth it ))) but 1200 - I would never pay so much for this glass

@PavSZ 2 года назад

I'd buy it for $500

@adosq 2 года назад

Panasonic zoom lens or Sigma 100-400 F5-6,3?

@PavSZ 2 года назад

only you can answer that question

@firehorseweddingphotograph3995 3 года назад

Hmmm... I have need of something like this for my landscape work which I don’t earn from and as such, the price is about 500 more than I’d spend, so it’s a no from me sadly. I had been looking forward to this one but hey ho...

@PavSZ 3 года назад

Have a look at Sigma 100-400 instead 😉 I have reviewed it awhile ago

@firehorseweddingphotograph3995 3 года назад

@@PavSZ That is a possibility and used, might be a few deals around...

@thegixlad27 Год назад

Compared to the Tamron 70-300 Sony?

@PavSZ Год назад

but why? You can't use Sony-E mount on Lumix camera

@thegixlad27 Год назад

@@PavSZ I understand that, I'm just comparing the two. If this helps, currently have the Tamron 70-300 for my Sony A7S III however I want another camera system hence my interest in Panasonic.

@PavSZ Год назад

@@thegixlad27 I've only used Nikon Z version of the Tamron lens and it was rock solid in comparison

@Marticulate 3 года назад

That soft image wide open and unresponsive focusing has turned me off considering the price. I can see this selling poorly and having to be heavily discounted like so many of the S series gear has in the past. Guess I just need to wait.

@PavSZ 3 года назад

I didn't experience soft image wide open or unresponsive focusing with this lens at all and I have shot over 1000 photos with it when reviewing it.